Laws

The COVID pandemic highlighted the importance of vaccine development and availability worldwide. Operation Warp-Speed in the United States accelerated vaccine production by several major pharmaceutical manufacturers, averting some of the normal administrative processes. The result has been a financial windfall for those companies. Some recent data has shown that the COVID vaccine can cause negative side effects in some patients. There are provisions in U.S. law that allow victims of vaccine injuries to recover compensation through the court system. However, even then tort remedies are limited by federal law. Since the review process was rushed during the pandemic, should tort immunity still be available to those pharmaceutical companies? This paper will discuss the legal and ethical issues involved in vaccine tort immunity.

International law has evolved to oblige states to treat children with disabilities with dignity and respect. Yet, where children with disabilities present as migrants, they face compounding challenges that are both physical and legal. This article explores key issues in general migration, including the discriminatory application of migration health rules, access to citizenship and birth registration, family reunification and access to education. There follows an account of particular challenges that face children with disabilities in forced migration and enforcement settings. The article touches briefly on the identification of disability, the vulnerabilities of these children to human trafficking and harms inherent in immigration enforcement mechanisms. The potential and limitations of protective mechanisms available in international law are explored using selective case studies most relevant to the author’s research work. Drawing on compilations of jurisprudence by university scholars and key not-for-profit organizations, the article includes some reflections on treaty body oversight of state party responses to migration, disability and human rights protection. The overarching aim is to interrogate and critique the operation of international legal mechanisms and the extent to which state practice is compliant with norms of international law. In this respect, the piece aligns with a broader project to improve international law and practice around disability, human rights and displacement.

This paper examines democratic backsliding through the lens of gender justice, focusing on recent political developments in Israel. Since early 2023, the ruling coalition has advanced a judicial overhaul designed to reduce judicial independence and consolidate executive control. These changes should be understood in tandem with a wave of suggested legislation targeting gender equality, women’s rights, and protections against discrimination in public life, education, and civil services. A qualitative analysis of governmental legislative initiatives reveals a troubling pattern: efforts to erode judicial independence are closely followed by laws that institutionalize gender segregation and undermine gender justice. This sequence reflects a deliberate strategy—first dismantling the legal safeguards, then attacking the rights they once protected. In response, women have played a leading role in Israel’s pro-democracy protest movement, using highly visible, gendered forms of resistance to signal that gender justice is a core democratic concern. The paper concludes that democratic backsliding in Israel is gendered in both its structure and its consequences, and any assessment of its impact must account for its disproportionate harm to women and marginalized communities.