Next Article in Journal
A GP-Based Hierarchical Objectives Decision-Making Method for Building Energy Efficiency Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study on the Life Cycle Assessment of New Zealand Residential Buildings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of the Embodied Carbon Emissions and Direct Construction Costs for Modular and Conventional Residential Buildings in South Korea

1
Department of Smart City Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
2
Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
3
School of Architecture, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2022, 12(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010051
Submission received: 22 November 2021 / Revised: 23 December 2021 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 6 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Building Energy, Physics, Environment, and Systems)

Abstract

Modular construction is an innovative new construction method that minimizes waste and improves efficiency within the construction industry. However, practitioners are hampered by the lack of environmental and economic sustainability analysis methods in this area. This study analyzes the embodied carbon emissions and direct construction costs incurred during the production phase of a modular residential building and provides comparison to an equivalent conventional residential building. Major drawings and design details for a modular residential building in South Korea were obtained, and the quantity take-off data for the major construction materials were analyzed for a modular construction method and a conventional construction method using a reinforced concrete structure under the same conditions. Focusing on major construction materials during the production phase, the embodied carbon emissions assessment revealed that adopting a modular construction approach reduced the environmental impact by approximately 36%, as compared to the conventional reinforced concrete method. However, in terms of the direct construction cost, the modular construction was approximately 8% more expensive than the conventional reinforced concrete construction method.
Keywords: modular construction; modular residential building; embodied carbon emission; major construction material; direct construction cost modular construction; modular residential building; embodied carbon emission; major construction material; direct construction cost

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, H.; Ahn, Y.; Roh, S. Comparison of the Embodied Carbon Emissions and Direct Construction Costs for Modular and Conventional Residential Buildings in South Korea. Buildings 2022, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010051

AMA Style

Jang H, Ahn Y, Roh S. Comparison of the Embodied Carbon Emissions and Direct Construction Costs for Modular and Conventional Residential Buildings in South Korea. Buildings. 2022; 12(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Hanbyeol, Yonghan Ahn, and Seungjun Roh. 2022. "Comparison of the Embodied Carbon Emissions and Direct Construction Costs for Modular and Conventional Residential Buildings in South Korea" Buildings 12, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010051

APA Style

Jang, H., Ahn, Y., & Roh, S. (2022). Comparison of the Embodied Carbon Emissions and Direct Construction Costs for Modular and Conventional Residential Buildings in South Korea. Buildings, 12(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop