Next Article in Journal
GIS Multisource Data for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings at the Urban Scale
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of External Wall Insulation on Mold and Moisture on the Buildings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Demystifying the Barriers and Motivators for the Adoption of Base Isolation Systems in New Zealand

by
Temitope Egbelakin
1,
Olabode Emmanuel Ogunmakinde
2,*,
Temitope Omotayo
3 and
Adebayo Sojobi
4
1
School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
2
Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4229, Australia
3
School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds LS2 8AG, UK
4
Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong 999077, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2022, 12(5), 522; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050522
Submission received: 24 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 19 April 2022 / Published: 21 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)

Abstract

A base isolator is a proven system that can significantly reduce any damage to a building in the event of an earthquake. Despite their efficacy, seismic isolators are not widely used in New Zealand, with only about forty systems in use during the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury Earthquakes. This study seeks to investigate why base isolation systems are not frequently used in seismic strengthening projects and buildings in New Zealand. It also focuses on determining ways in which seismic isolators could become more widely used in New Zealand due to increased seismic activity. This study used an exploratory sequential mixed method design, in which qualitative data were collected first through in-depth face-to-face interviews, analysed, and used to construct the quantitative instrument, which was an online questionnaire. Data were obtained from construction professionals such as architects, engineers, site-based construction personnel, and quantity surveyors. The findings of this study indicated the need for an increased awareness of base isolation systems and improved universal guidelines for the design of seismic isolators. The motivators identified include provision of monetary incentives, such as reduced insurance premiums and financial subsidies, to encourage the adoption of seismic isolators. The factors preventing the adoption of base isolation systems in New Zealand were classified as human-related, safety and design-related, and cost-related. The study’s implication is that providing a universal guideline for seismic isolators can enhance designers’ confidence. Likewise, incentives may be provided to property owners to lower the cost of implementing a base isolation system.
Keywords: base isolation system; barriers; motivators; seismic strengthening; New Zealand base isolation system; barriers; motivators; seismic strengthening; New Zealand

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Egbelakin, T.; Ogunmakinde, O.E.; Omotayo, T.; Sojobi, A. Demystifying the Barriers and Motivators for the Adoption of Base Isolation Systems in New Zealand. Buildings 2022, 12, 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050522

AMA Style

Egbelakin T, Ogunmakinde OE, Omotayo T, Sojobi A. Demystifying the Barriers and Motivators for the Adoption of Base Isolation Systems in New Zealand. Buildings. 2022; 12(5):522. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Egbelakin, Temitope, Olabode Emmanuel Ogunmakinde, Temitope Omotayo, and Adebayo Sojobi. 2022. "Demystifying the Barriers and Motivators for the Adoption of Base Isolation Systems in New Zealand" Buildings 12, no. 5: 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050522

APA Style

Egbelakin, T., Ogunmakinde, O. E., Omotayo, T., & Sojobi, A. (2022). Demystifying the Barriers and Motivators for the Adoption of Base Isolation Systems in New Zealand. Buildings, 12(5), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop