Next Article in Journal
Urban Seismic Risk Assessment and Damage Estimation: Case of Rif Buildings (North of Morocco)
Next Article in Special Issue
Nonlinear Response of RC Columns Subjected to Equal Energy-Double Impact Loads
Previous Article in Journal
Interplay of Message Frame and Reference Point on Recycled Water Acceptance in Green Community: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Experiment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Shear Strength Prediction of Slender Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams Using a Gradient Boosting Regression Tree Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Development of an Ultra-High-Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) Manufacturable at Ambient Temperature

Buildings 2022, 12(6), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060740
by Koji Tamataki 1, Tomoaki Ito 1, Yutaka Fujino 1 and Isamu Yoshitake 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Buildings 2022, 12(6), 740; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060740
Submission received: 24 April 2022 / Revised: 23 May 2022 / Accepted: 26 May 2022 / Published: 30 May 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Great study and the results look promising. However, more technical findings can be drawn from the result.

Page 2 Line 81-84 : The information can be seen on the table. No need to explain it as you can see it in the table. Explanation of the different types (A to E) and why choosing those mixes can be more reasonable.

Do you propose this method for application?

How about the repeatability of the tests?

Author Response

Thank you for the positive evaluation. The manuscript was revised to address the concerns and comments raised by the reviewer. 
Please see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for the useful comments. The manuscript was revised to address the concerns and comments raised by the reviewer. 
Please see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

All remarks were considered by authors. The current version of this paper is acceptable for reviewer.

Back to TopTop