Next Article in Journal
Safety Risk Management of Prefabricated Building Construction Based on Ontology Technology in the BIM Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Prestressed Concrete Box Girder with High-Capacity Strands-Monitoring and Analysis during Fabrication
Previous Article in Journal
Importance of Autonomous Motivation in Construction Labor Productivity Improvement in Vietnam: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Buckling Deformation for the Side Plate of Rectangular CSFT Column Based on Plate Theory with Bi-Axial Loads
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural Performance and Reasonable Cross-Ratio of Cross-Cable Multi-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridges

1
Institute of Land Engineering and Technology, Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710075, China
2
Key Laboratory of Degraded and Unused Land Consolidation Engineering, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xi’an 710075, China
3
Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Bridges and Tunnels, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
4
School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2022, 12(6), 764; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060764
Submission received: 10 May 2022 / Revised: 1 June 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 4 June 2022

Abstract

The Queensferry Crossing in the UK is the first multi-tower cable-stayed bridge in the world to use mid-span cross-stayed cables to improve structural rigidity. To study the structural performance and economy of cross-cable multi-tower cable-stayed bridges, a total of 11 finite element models were established using two cross-cable setting methods. By changing the number of crossed cables in the mid-span, the variation laws of structural deformation and internal force are obtained. The cross-cable efficiency based on structural stiffness and the cross-cable economy based on the consumption of cables used in the entire bridge are quantitatively analyzed, and it is considered that there is a reasonable cross-ratio of cross-cables. Combined with the current design specification and the empirical data of the actual bridge, the limits of the double indicators were determined, and a scheme comparison chart was formed. The results show that under the action of unbalanced load, the cross cable can greatly reduce deformation and balance the internal force of the structure. The optimal solution is to form a mid-span cable crossing by adjusting the cable spacing, and the reasonable range of cross-ratio is 15%~35%. If the structural stiffness is improved by adding additional cross cables, the cross-ratio should be controlled within 16% to ensure structural economy. This provides a reference for the design and research of cross-cable multi-tower cable-stayed bridges in the future.
Keywords: multi-tower cable-stayed bridges; cross cable; double indicators; reasonable cross-ratio multi-tower cable-stayed bridges; cross cable; double indicators; reasonable cross-ratio

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, S.; Peng, B.; Wang, L.; Chen, H. Structural Performance and Reasonable Cross-Ratio of Cross-Cable Multi-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridges. Buildings 2022, 12, 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060764

AMA Style

Yao S, Peng B, Wang L, Chen H. Structural Performance and Reasonable Cross-Ratio of Cross-Cable Multi-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridges. Buildings. 2022; 12(6):764. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Sisi, Biao Peng, Luyao Wang, and Hengda Chen. 2022. "Structural Performance and Reasonable Cross-Ratio of Cross-Cable Multi-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridges" Buildings 12, no. 6: 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060764

APA Style

Yao, S., Peng, B., Wang, L., & Chen, H. (2022). Structural Performance and Reasonable Cross-Ratio of Cross-Cable Multi-Tower Cable-Stayed Bridges. Buildings, 12(6), 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop