Next Article in Journal
Structural Response of a Prefabricated Utility Tunnel Subject to a Reverse Fault
Previous Article in Journal
Formwork System Selection in Building Construction Projects Using an Integrated Rough AHP-EDAS Approach: A Case Study
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

FRP Poles: A State-of-the-Art-Review of Manufacturing, Testing, and Modeling

Buildings 2022, 12(8), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081085
by Ahmed M. EL-Fiky 1, Youssef Ahmed Awad 1,2, Hosam Mostafa Elhegazy 2,*, Mahmoud Galal Hasan 1, Ibrahim Abdel-Latif 1, Ahmed M. Ebid 2 and Mohamed A. Khalaf 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Buildings 2022, 12(8), 1085; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081085
Submission received: 9 June 2022 / Revised: 1 July 2022 / Accepted: 21 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Building Materials, and Repair & Renovation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewers,
Thank you for your helpful comments and suggestions on the language and structure of our manuscript. We have carefully considered all the reviewers' comments and have made appropriate changes to the manuscript in response. The authors sincerely appreciate the comments by the reviewers. Therefore, our paper has been revised, considering all the comments and reviewers' suggestions.

We hope that the revisions in the manuscript and our accompanying responses will satisfy the reviewers and make our work suitable for publication in your journal.

This is for your kind consideration. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewers,
Thank you for your helpful comments and suggestions on the language and structure of our manuscript. We have carefully considered all the reviewers' comments and have made appropriate changes to the manuscript in response. The authors sincerely appreciate the comments by the reviewers. Therefore, our paper has been revised, considering all the comments and reviewers' suggestions.

We hope that the revisions in the manuscript and our accompanying responses will satisfy the reviewers and make our work suitable for publication in your journal.

This is for your kind consideration. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I am accepting the manuscript, but the language should be further improved.

Back to TopTop