Flexural Performance of Splice Connections in Cross-Laminated Timber
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Details of the Experimental Program
2.1. Configuration of the Connection Systems
2.2. Material Properties of the Elements
2.2.1. CLT Panel
2.2.2. Plywood
2.2.3. Steel Plate, Bolts, and STS
2.2.4. Testing Details
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Ultimate Moment and Angle of Support Rotation
3.2. Rotational Rigidity and Ductility
3.3. Effect of Lap Lengths on the Half-Lapped Connections
3.4. Effect of Steel Plates on the Behaviour of Bolted Spline Connections
3.5. Effect of Axis Orientation on Spline Connections
3.6. Influence of Spline Plate Types on Connections
4. Summary and Conclusions
- Compared to 75 mm lap length, a 100 mm lap length demonstrates 39% and 33% higher moment capacities for the bolted and screwed lap connections, respectively. Rotational rigidity and ductility of the lap connections also increase with the increase in the lap length. However, further investigation is recommended to determine an optimum lap length for the connections.
- Plastic deformations were observed in bolted lap connections, whereas screwed lap connections exhibited relatively linear behaviour until they reached the ultimate moment capacity. Irrespective of lap lengths, the bolted lap connections showed better performance in terms of moment capacity, support rotation and ductility when compared to their counterpart (screwed lap) connections. In contrast, the rotational rigidity of screwed connections was observed to be higher than that of bolted lap connections.
- The spline plate types showed a significant influence on the capacity of spline connections. The steel spline connection attained approximately 24%, 5% and 73% higher moment capacity, rotational rigidity and ductility, respectively, when compared to those for the plywood spline connection. However, the support rotation for the steel spline connection was found to be 6% less compared to that of the plywood spline connections.
- An increase in bolt diameter increases moment capacity but decreases rotational rigidity when plate thickness is constant. The effect of an increase in the thickness of the steel spline on the capacities of the bolted steel spline connections subjected to bending moment is found to be insignificant.
- The effect of glue on the bending moment, support rotation and rigidity of plywood spline connections was found to be negligible, as plywood spline connections without glue performed better. However, the application of glue along with bolts enhanced the ductility of the plywood spline connections by 26%.
- The axis of loading (major axis vs. minor axis) is vital; connections tested along the minor axis showed less resistance to bending loads than the connections tested along the major axis. Nevertheless, the performance of the bolted spline connection system about the minor axis is not insignificant.
- Overall, spline connections showed better performance in terms of moment capacity, support rotation, rotational rigidity and ductility compared to lap connections. The Ø8 mm bolt and 3 mm-thick steel spline were recognised as an optimum combination for the spline connections, as they showed the highest resistance to the bending moment.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jeleč, M.; Varevac, D.; Rajčić, V. Cross-laminated timber (CLT)—A state of the art report. Gradevinar 2018, 70, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Y.-J.; Hong, S.-I. Compressive Strength Properties Perpendicular to the Grain of Larch Cross-laminated Timber. BioResources 2019, 14, 4304–4315. [Google Scholar]
- Bhat, J.A. Buckling behavior of cross laminated poplar timber columns using various performance improvement techniques. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 44, 2792–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roensmaens, B.; Avez, C.; Van Parys, L.; Descamps, T. Refurbishment of Timber Floors with Screwed CLT Panels: Tests on Floor Elements and Connections. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2021, 15, 334–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, M.; Sun, X.; Li, Z. Bending and compressive properties of cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels made from Canadian hemlock. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 185, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roensmaens, B.; Van Parys, L.; Carpentier, O.; Descamps, T. Refurbishment of existing timber floors with screwed CLT panels. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2018, 12, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humar, M.; Kržišnik, D.; Lesar, B.; Dujič, B. Monitoring a building made of CLT in Ljubljana. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 15, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, S.; Rammer, D.; Popovski, M.; Williamson, T.; Line, P.; van de Lindt, J.W. An overview of CLT research and implementation in North America. In Proceedings of the WCTE 2016, Vienna, Austria, 22–25 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Brandner, R.; Flatscher, G.; Ringhofer, A.; Schickhofer, G.; Thiel, A. Cross laminated timber (CLT): Overview and development. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2016, 74, 331–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Ceallaigh, C.; Harte, A.M. The elastic and ductile behaviour of CLT wall-floor connections and the influence of fastener length. Eng. Struct. 2019, 189, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, B.; Barbosa, A.R.; Sinha, A. Cyclic performance of in-plane shear cross-laminated timber panel-to-panel surface spline connections. Eng. Struct. 2020, 218, 110726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Izzi, M.; Casagrande, D.; Bezzi, S.; Pasca, D.; Follesa, M.; Tomasi, R. Seismic behaviour of Cross-Laminated Timber structures: A state-of-the-art review. Eng. Struct. 2018, 170, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferk, H. Some building science aspects for building with CLT. In Focus Solid Timber Solutions-European Conference on Cross Laminated Timber (CLT); University of Bath: Bath, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Ashraf, M.; Subhani, M.; Kremer, P.; Li, H.; Anwar-Us-Saadat, M. Rolling shear properties of cross-laminated timber (CLT) made from Australian Radiata Pine–An experimental study. Structures 2021, 33, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.; Ashraf, M.; Ghabraie, K.; Subhani, M. Evaluating timoshenko method for analyzing CLT under out-of-plane loading. Buildings 2020, 10, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Ashraf, M.; Subhani, M.; Kremer, P.; Kafle, B.; Ghabraie, K. Experimental and numerical study on bending properties of heterogeneous lamella layups in cross laminated timber using Australian Radiata Pine. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ettelaei, A.; Taoum, A.; Nolan, G. Rolling shear properties of cross-laminated timber made of fibre-managed plantation eucalyptus under short-span bending. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeghi, M.; Ballerini, M.; Smith, I.; Pedrotti, E. Bending properties of connections in cross laminated timber. In IABSE Symposium Report; International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering: Zurich, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Gagnon, S.; Pirvu, C. CLT Handbook: Cross-Laminated Timber; FPInnovations: Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Lam, F.; Qiu, H. Comparison of glulam beam-to-beam connections with round dovetail and half-lap joints reinforced with self-tapping screws. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 227, 116437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muster, M.; Frangi, A. Experimental analysis and structural modelling of the punching behaviour of continuous two-way CLT flat slabs. Eng. Struct. 2020, 205, 110046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarnani, P.; Quenneville, P. New design approach for controlling brittle failure modes of small-dowel-type connections in Cross-laminated Timber (CLT). Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 100, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uibel, T.; Blaß, H.J. Load carrying capacity of joints with dowel type fasteners in solid wood panels. In Proceedings of the CIB-W18 Meeting, Florence, Italy, 28–31 August 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Uibel, T.; Blaß, H.J. Edge joints with dowel type fasteners in cross laminated timber. In Proceedings of the CIB-W18 Meeting, Bled, Slovenia, 28–31 August 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Tomasi, R.; Parisi, M.A.; Piazza, M. Ductile design of glued-laminated timber beams. Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 2009, 14, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseinzadeh, S.; Mohebby, B.; Elyasi, M. Bending performances and rolling shear strength of nail-cross-laminated timber. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 17, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Chui, Y.H. Characterizing flexural behaviour of panel-to-panel connections in cross-laminated timber floor systems. Structures 2020, 28, 2047–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AS 1720.1; Timber Structures Part 1, in Design Methods. Standards Australia: Sydney, Australia, 2010.
- EN 338: 2016; Structural Timber—Strength Classes. BSI Standards Publication: London, UK, 2016.
- AS 4100-1998 (R2016); Steelwork in Structures. SAI Global: Sydney, Australia, 1998.
- AS/NZS 4063.1; Characterization of Structural Timber. Standards Australia: Sydney, Australia, 2010.
- EN 14358: 2016; Timber Structures–Calculation and Verification of Characteristic Values. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2016.
- Subhani, M.; Globa, A.; Moloney, J. Timber-FRP composite beam subjected to negative bending. Struct. Eng. Mech. 2020, 73, 353–365. [Google Scholar]
Connection Type | Variation in Lap/Spline | Number of Samples | Fastener Type | Sample Dimensions (L-W-D) | Axis Orientation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lap | 100 mm | 3 | 14-10 STS | 1150-200-60 | Major |
75 mm | 3 | ||||
100 mm | 3 | Bolt Ø8 mm | |||
75 mm | 3 | ||||
Spline | 3 mm steel spline | 3 | Bolt Ø8 mm | 1000-200-60 | Major |
3 mm steel spline | 3 | Bolt Ø6 mm | |||
8 mm steel spline | 3 | Bolt Ø8 mm | |||
8 mm steel spline | 3 | Bolt Ø6 mm | |||
17 mm plywood spline glued | 3 | Bolt Ø8 mm | 1000-200-60 | Minor | |
17 mm plywood spline | 3 | ||||
8 mm steel spline | 3 |
Properties of the Individual Lamella | Values (MPa) |
---|---|
Modulus of elasticity parallel to the grain | 11,000 |
Modulus of elasticity perpendicular to the grain | 370 |
Rolling shear modulus | 72 |
Bending strength | 24 |
Tensile strength parallel to the grain | 14 |
Tensile strength perpendicular to the grain | 0.4 |
Compressive strength parallel to the grain | 21 |
Compressive strength perpendicular to the grain | 5.3 |
Rolling shear strength | 2.5 |
Properties of the Plywood | Values (MPa) |
---|---|
Modulus of elasticity parallel to the grain | 14,000 |
Modulus of rigidity | 930 |
Bending strength | 2.42 |
Tensile strength parallel to the grain | 25 |
Tensile strength perpendicular to the grain | 0.6 |
Compressive strength parallel to the grain | 34 |
Shear strength in the beam | 3.6 |
Connection Type | Variations | Fastener Type | Ultimate Bending Moment Mu (kN-m) | The Angle of Rotation at the Support θu (Degree) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | COV (%) | Character-istic Values | Mean | COV (%) | Character-istic Values | ||||
Lap | 100 mm lap length | 14-10 STS | 0.66 | 5.8 | 0.54 | 1.26 | 14.8 | 1.17 | |
75 mm lap length | 14-10 STS | 0.59 | 14.1 | 0.33 | 1.30 | 15.3 | 1.21 | ||
100 mm lap length | Bolt Ø8 mm | 1.43 | 5.5 | 1.18 | 7.34 | 32.6 | 6.21 | ||
75 mm lap length | Bolt Ø8 mm | 1.07 | 8.4 | 0.79 | 7.99 | 46.1 | 6.26 | ||
Spline | Major axis | 3 mm steel spline | Bolt Ø8 mm | 2.45 | 5.2 | 2.05 | 15.45 | 3.2 | 15.22 |
3 mm steel spline | Bolt Ø6 mm | 2.00 | 24.8 | 0.44 | 13.15 | 19.4 | 11.95 | ||
8 mm steel spline | Bolt Ø8 mm | 2.38 | 5.0 | 2.01 | 14.51 | 12.3 | 13.67 | ||
8 mm steel spline | Bolt Ø6 mm | 2.16 | 7.2 | 1.67 | 15.68 | 3.5 | 15.42 | ||
Minor axis | 17 mm plywood spline glued | Bolt Ø8 mm | 1.30 | 9.0 | 0.93 | 10.48 | 25.4 | 9.23 | |
17 mm plywood spline | 1.53 | 2.10 | 1.43 | 14.09 | 1.5 | 13.99 | |||
8 mm steel spline | 2.01 | 8.4 | 1.48 | 13.25 | 12.1 | 12.49 |
Connection Type | Variations | Fastener Type | Rotational Rigidity Rj (kN-m/deg) | Ductility (deg/deg) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | COV (%) | Characteristic Values | Mean | COV (%) | Characteristic Values | ||||
Lap | 100 mm lap length | 14-10 STS | 0.68 | 18.7 | 0.62 | 2.16 | 14.2 | 2.02 | |
75 mm lap length | 14-10 STS | 0.49 | 31.0 | 0.42 | 2.07 | 37.1 | 1.71 | ||
100 mm lap length | Bolt Ø8 mm | 0.34 | 20.7 | 0.31 | 5.27 | 18.1 | 4.82 | ||
75 mm lap length | Bolt Ø8 mm | 0.26 | 41.1 | 0.21 | 4.51 | 14.9 | 4.19 | ||
Spline | Major axis | 3 mm steel spline | Bolt Ø8 mm | 0.35 | 4.8 | 0.34 | 7.81 | 7.4 | 7.54 |
3 mm steel spline | Bolt Ø6 mm | 0.45 | 35.9 | 0.37 | 8.42 | 44.2 | 6.67 | ||
8 mm steel spline | Bolt Ø8 mm | 0.37 | 16.9 | 0.34 | 5.32 | 14.2 | 4.96 | ||
8 mm steel spline | Bolt Ø6 mm | 0.37 | 12.3 | 0.35 | 8.95 | 23.2 | 7.97 | ||
Minor axis | 17 mm plywood spline glued | Bolt Ø8 mm | 0.18 | 4.2 | 0.18 | 5.42 | 32.8 | 4.58 | |
17 mm plywood spline | 0.22 | 8.9 | 0.21 | 3.95 | 1.4 | 3.92 | |||
8 mm steel spline | 0.23 | 17.8 | 0.21 | 6.83 | 47.7 | 5.30 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Subhani, M.; Shill, S.K.; Al-Deen, S.; Anwar-Us-Saadat, M.; Ashraf, M. Flexural Performance of Splice Connections in Cross-Laminated Timber. Buildings 2022, 12, 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081124
Subhani M, Shill SK, Al-Deen S, Anwar-Us-Saadat M, Ashraf M. Flexural Performance of Splice Connections in Cross-Laminated Timber. Buildings. 2022; 12(8):1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081124
Chicago/Turabian StyleSubhani, Mahbube, Sukanta Kumer Shill, Safat Al-Deen, Mohammad Anwar-Us-Saadat, and Mahmud Ashraf. 2022. "Flexural Performance of Splice Connections in Cross-Laminated Timber" Buildings 12, no. 8: 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081124
APA StyleSubhani, M., Shill, S. K., Al-Deen, S., Anwar-Us-Saadat, M., & Ashraf, M. (2022). Flexural Performance of Splice Connections in Cross-Laminated Timber. Buildings, 12(8), 1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081124