1. Introduction
Wooden frame ancient buildings constitute the primary components of traditional Chinese architecture [
1]. In the Tibetan areas of Yunnan, the internal wooden frames of Tusi Manor buildings play a crucial load-bearing role, while the external walls consist of rammed earth, as depicted in
Figure 1. The Tibetan areas in Yunnan encompass a typical junction area where various ethnic groups coexist. The local Tusi people preserve Tibetan architectural style while incorporating architectural techniques from other ethnic groups. The Tusi Manor, located at the boundary between high-level halls and ordinary residential areas, represents the culmination of local construction techniques, boasting a rich architectural history and cultural value [
2]. The Tibetan areas of Yunnan experience alternating wet and dry climates. Consequently, the original wooden components within the existing Tusi Manor are prone to cracking, insect infestation, and fungal decay. These factors pose a threat to the longevity of the wooden frames [
3,
4,
5].
The vertical connection between the wooden beams and columns of the Tusi Manor in Tibetan areas of Yunnan primarily relies on the overlay of beams and columns method. Additionally, wooden nails are used to reinforce and connect the beams and columns [
6]. For horizontal connections, Dovetail tenon, Straight Mortise-and-Tenon Joints, and Hoop Head Tenon-mortise Joints (HHTMJ) are primarily used. The HHTMJ connection is specifically employed for connecting the center beam and side column structures. In this type of connection, the tenon shoulder and the mortise and tenon, located outside the wood column, exert mutual pressure, thereby enhancing resistance against compression and pull-out forces. It is considered a special type of mortise and tenon joint [
7]. However, due to the frequent exposure of the HHTMJ to the external environment, it is prone to fungal decay. In recent years, scholars have conducted numerous experimental studies to investigate the effects of salvage and disease on the mechanical properties of wood structural joints. For instance, Zhang et al. simulated the degradation of mortise and tenon joints by altering their size and controlling the width of the compression zone and gap [
8,
9,
10,
11]. King et al. simulated fungal decay, cracking, and degradation of wooden member joints by drilling holes and grooves. They found that degraded joints were susceptible to fungal decay, cracking, and reduced mechanical properties [
12,
13]. Chen et al. examined the effects of different beam section heights, column diameters, and column top pressures on the mechanical properties of HHTMJ. They also analyzed the moment-rotation relationship of the joints [
14,
15]. While the above research methods simulated the appearance and mechanical properties of decayed joints, it is important to note that the timber properties of the wood used in these studies did not change and may differ from the actual situation.
To study the effect of decay on the degradation of mechanical properties of wood, scholars have conducted a series of studies in the past [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20], and it was found that the degradation of the mechanical properties of decayed wood was directly proportional to the decay cycle, and many of the mechanical properties of the wood degraded significantly after treatment with a shorter decay cycle, but the majority of these studies were carried out through the decay test of small test specimens. Wang and García, among others, investigated the degradation patterns of the mechanical properties of wood under different artificial decay treatment methods [
21,
22]. Mi, Yang, and colleagues directly tested the mechanical properties of degraded wood obtained from ancient buildings. They found that, compared to non-degraded specimens, samples removed from ancient buildings exhibited varying degrees of uniform degradation, with aged specimens being more prone to decay [
5,
23].
Although the mechanical performance derived from small-scale wood specimens can, to some extent, reflect the mechanical properties of full-scale wood components, there may be significant differences in the degradation patterns between small-scale specimens and full-scale specimens when mechanical performance deteriorates [
24]. Kim believed that the strength degradation law obtained from the decay test of small specimens did not apply to full-size specimens and conducted decay tests on full-size southern pine specimens and found that the mechanical properties of full-size specimens had been significantly degraded at a lower decay level [
25]. To investigate the impact of wood degradation in the materials used for wooden components on the mechanical performance degradation of these components. Lydia, Zhang, and others conducted damage treatments on wooden components by designing extreme climatic conditions and improving laboratory decay methods. This simulated the mechanical performance degradation of wooden components in real decay environments [
26,
27,
28]. Ma and Chen et al. conducted experimental research on the removal of damaged mortise and tenon joints from ancient wooden structures and found that as the degree of damage increased, the mechanical properties of the joints decreased significantly [
29,
30]. The research conducted by these scholars further revealed the mechanical performance of wooden components in timber structures after experiencing degradation. Despite scholars employing various methods over the past decade to simulate decay in HHTMJ, there are still notable differences between these simulation approaches and the actual decay experienced by HHTMJ in practice.
Some researchers have also investigated the degradation of small-sized wood specimens to infer the degradation of full-sized specimens’ mechanical properties due to decay. However, owing to the presence of size effects, there are considerable distinctions between the degradation patterns of small-sized specimens and those of full-sized specimens.
To delve into the impact of decay on the mechanical properties and degradation of HHTMJ, we referred to established wood decay standards and methodologies employed by contemporary scholars. Utilizing Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis sourced from the Tusi Manor in Tibetan areas of Yunnan as our experimental material, we fashioned a typical HHTMJ specimen representative of the Tusi Manor’s structures. By introducing wood-rotting fungi through inoculation, we obtained HHTMJ specimens exhibiting varying degrees of decay specific to the Tusi Manor’s buildings in Tibetan areas of Yunnan. Low-cycle repeated loading was employed to subject HHTMJ to loading, investigating the seismic performance of HHTMJ under various degrees of decay. The mechanical properties of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis were also assessed both pre- and post-decay, allowing us to elucidate the degradation of mechanical properties in HHTMJ. We aim to furnish a reference framework for reinforcing and repairing the buildings of the Tusi Manor in the Tibetan areas of Yunnan.
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Failure Mode
For the non-decayed specimen ST-1, during the initial loading stage, small clearances between the joints result in a relatively slow increase in load on the actuator. As loading continues, the tenon and mortise rub against each other, producing slight sounds. After unloading, no significant deformation of the projecting tenon or mortise is observed. When loaded to a displacement of 55 mm, mutual compression between the tenon and mortise leads to increased deformation of the tenon, accompanied by slight cracking sounds at the mortise with wood fibers. Upon further loading to a displacement of 75 mm, distinct wood fracture sounds are heard at the tenon, cracks form at the tenon shoulder, and the tenon exhibits noticeable plastic deformation and pullout, as shown in
Figure 8a. Loading is then stopped.
For specimen ST-2, initially, during loading, there was minor plastic deformation in the contact area between the tenon shoulder and the mortise. As loading progressed, the friction and extrusion sounds between the tenon and mortise increased gradually, accompanied by a rise in tenon slip and deformation. When the loading displacement reached 70 mm, a noticeable wood fracture sound was heard at the joint, accompanied by a higher tenon pulling force. Further loading to 75 mm resulted in increased tenon cracks and evident deformation damage at the joint between the tenon shoulder and mortise, as depicted in
Figure 8b. Loading was then halted. Like specimen ST-2, specimen ST-3 also showed plastic deformation in the contact area between the tenon shoulder and the mortise at the start of loading. At a displacement of approximately 65 mm, the tenon emitted a small wood-breaking sound, and wood chips dislodged from the shoulder and mortise extrusion area. This was accompanied by a notable tenon pull-out phenomenon, as illustrated in
Figure 8c. With continued loading, the plastic deformation became more pronounced. When the loading displacement reached 75 mm, wood chips were shed at the tenon shoulder, and there was evident plastic deformation and damage at the joint. Loading was then stopped.
For specimens ST-4 and ST-5, similar to specimen ST-3, slight plastic deformation and wood chips were shedding at the tenon shoulder during the initial loading. At a loading displacement of 50 mm, specimen ST-4 experienced a notable release of wood chips from the tenon shoulder. When the loading displacement reached 65 mm, the tenon emitted a small sound of wood breaking, and at a continued displacement of 70 mm, a substantial fracture occurred in the tenon. Upon loading to a displacement of 75 mm, the tenon displayed severe plastic deformation and damage, leading to the cessation of loading. The characteristics of node damage are illustrated in
Figure 8d. For specimen ST-5, when loaded to 45 mm, a smaller wood fracture sound occurred at the tenon, and the crack gradually expanded with the increasing loading displacement. At a loading displacement of 60 mm, the wood pieces at the tenon shoulder of specimen ST-5 detached in one piece along the grain direction, accompanied by a slight wood fracture sound at the tenon during forward loading. By the time the load reached 70 mm, the tenon emitted a loud sound indicating wood fracture, and visible cracks appeared at the tenon. The actuator showed a significant decrease in load value. Continuing to a load of 75 mm, the actuator load remained nearly unchanged, while the tenon was destroyed. Loading was promptly halted, and the failure characteristics of the node are depicted in
Figure 8e. A comprehensive analysis of the information reveals that with the increase in the decay period, the primary failure mode of HHTMJ under the same load level has not undergone significant changes, mainly displaying fracture failure at the tenon shoulder. However, the extent of damage is increasing, and the failure mode is becoming more complex.
As shown in
Figure 9, during positive loading, there is an upward sliding component force on the wood pad at the tenon shoulder, resulting in a tendency for both the stigma and the wood pad to slide upward, whereas during negative loading, there is a downward sliding component force on the wood pad at the tenon shoulder and a tendency for the mortise to slide downward. This makes the nodal bending moment in negative loading greater than that in positive loading. According to the research by Chang [
13] et al. on HHTMJ with different degrees of damage, it was found that the phenomenon of relative slippage between the tenon eye and the wood pad would form a “pseudo-dovetail” mechanism in timber frame structures. This mechanism can provide lateral support for the timber frame, and an increase in the degree of damage weakens this mechanism. The damage pattern of the mortise is shown in
Figure 10. The degree of damage at the end in contact with the wooden pad is greater than that at the end away from the wooden pad. By comparing the damage characteristics of the mortise and tenon at nodes with different decay cycles, the deformation and splitting phenomena of the head timber are more obvious with the increase in decay cycles.
Figure 11 illustrates the forces acting on the HHTMJ during forward loading, providing insight into the compressive plastic deformation of the transverse wood grain in the primary compression area of the tenon and mortise. To facilitate the description, designate the primary contact region between the tenon and mortise as point ABCD. When force F is applied, the cross-grain direction of the tenon at points A and D undergoes compression by the cross-grain direction of the mortise, resulting in plastic deformation. Similarly, the wood at the tenon’s shoulder is extruded in the cross-grain direction by the wood of the extrusion post, with the extrusion depth increasing along the midpoint of the dotted line on both sides.
Figure 12 presents the stress analysis of the HHTMJ cross-section, shedding light on the occurrence of wood chip-off at the tenon shoulder and extrusion deformation of the wood at the mortise edge during larger loading displacements. During negative loading, the post head applies force
Fb to the tenon shoulder. Referring to
Figure 11 makes it evident that stresses become more concentrated the farther they are from the tenon center. This concentration leads to increased susceptibility of the wood at the edge of the tenon shoulder to plastic deformation. In the case of forward loading, the wood size at the CD end of the HHTMJ tenon is smaller. The tenon shoulder’s edge is prone to plastic deformation when subjected to the concentrated force
Fc. The tenon shoulder generates significant paragrain shear stress, and the wood paragrain shear strength decreases with a large decay cycle and a small length lc of the upper end of the tenon. This reduced paragrain shear resistance contributes to the woodshedding at the edge of the tenon shoulder in the paragrain direction.
3.2. Hysteresis Curve and Skeleton Curve
The
M-θ hysteresis curve under horizontal low-cycle cyclic load can describe the seismic performance of mortise-tenon joints. The larger the area enclosed by the hysteresis loop, the stronger the energy dissipation capacity of the joints and the better the seismic performance. The bending moment (
M) and its corresponding turning angle (
θ) are determined as follows:
where
P is the load applied by the actuator,
H is the distance between the upper surface of the column and the loading. point, and Δ is the horizontal displacement of the loading point.
Figure 13 demonstrates the hysteresis curve and skeleton curve of the HHTMJ in this experiment.
By analyzing
Figure 13a–e, the following considerations can be drawn:
By comparing the hysteresis curves of each specimen, it is observed that the curves shift from an anti-‘S’-type to an anti-‘Z’-type. This shift signifies noticeable pinching and slipping phenomena at the nodes, and these effects become more pronounced with an increasing decay cycle. Beyond a loading angle of 0.03 rad, the hysteresis curve envelope area and bending moment values for the second and third loadings are smaller than those for the first loading at the same angle. Moreover, with a growing decay cycle, the difference between the hysteresis curve area of the second and third loadings and that of the first loading at the same angle becomes more significant. This suggests plastic deformation in the nodes during the loading process, with the degree of deformation becoming increasingly evident as the decay period lengthens. As the decay period increases, the hysteresis curve envelope area becomes less full, the stiffness of HHTMJ gradually degrades, the bending moment decreases rapidly during unloading, and deformation recovery is smaller. The value of the corner at which the node begins to decrease in bearing capacity during positive loading gradually decreases with an increasing decay cycle. Cracking initiates at the tenon joint during the intermediate stage of loading. As the load advances, the bending moment at the joint progressively diminishes in the forward direction, and the rate of decline in the bending moment decelerates when subjected to negative loading. During this phase, the rotational bending moment of the tenon joint predominantly originates from the transverse compression applied by the compressive side of the tenon diameter and the compression of the tenon shoulder against the column. Nevertheless, as the loading displacement increases, cracks multiply, causing a gradual decrease in the bending moment at the joint, ultimately culminating in failure.
Figure 14 illustrates the skeleton curve of HHTMJ. Initially, in the pre-loading phase, the positive and negative loading moment values of the skeleton curve exhibit symmetry. As the loading displacement increases, noticeable asymmetry appears in the skeleton curve, with the negative loading bending moment significantly surpassing the positive loading. This asymmetry arises because, during substantial negative loading, the tenon shoulder slightly elevates the head of the column. This positioning subjects the column’s head to the influence of the wood pad at the top and axial pressure constraints, resulting in increased stiffness of the HHTMJ during negative rotation.
The skeleton curve of HHTMJ can be categorized into elastic, plastic strengthening, and destruction phases. Initially, during the early loading stage, the primary force mode between nodes involves extrusion between mortise side edges and tenons, causing a faster growth of bending moments in the elastic stage. It is observed that, with an increase in the decay cycle, the elastic stage constitutes a smaller proportion of the overall loading stage. As loading continues, the rate of bending moment growth at the joint decreases, and the tenon undergoes significant deformation, entering the plastic strengthening stage. When comparing the plastic strengthening stages of different decayed joint specimens, it is noted that post-decay, the slope of the skeleton curve in this stage decreases significantly, accompanied by an increase in joint plastic deformation. Towards the end of the plastic strengthening stage, tenon cracking results in a gradual decrease in bearing capacity, marking the entry into the damage stage. As the decay cycle increases, the loading angle at the beginning of the damage stage gradually decreases, and the curve’s decline in this stage becomes more pronounced. A higher degree of decay increases the likelihood and severity of node damage at the same loading level. Taking the ultimate bearing load of the ST-1 node during negative loading as a reference, specimens ST-2, ST-3, ST-4, and ST-5 degraded by 8.83%, 16.97%, 19.69%, and 30.22%, respectively.
3.3. Strength and Stiffness Degradation
At the same loading level, the peak load and hysteresis loop area are larger in cycle 1, indicating that the HHTMJ undergoes plastic deformation in cycle 1, resulting in voids between the tenons in cycles 2 and 3. In the proposed horizontal static loading test, three cycles of loading were carried out for each loading stage, and the horizontal load acting on the joints gradually decreased with an increase in loading times. The strength degradation factor can be calculated using the following equation:
where λ
i is the strength degradation factor of the i-th loading level;
Pi,1 is the peak load value of the first cycle in the i-th loading level, and P
i,3 is the peak load value of the third cycle in the i-th loading level. The variation rule of the strength degradation factor of each node calculated by Equation (3) is shown in
Figure 15 below.
The phenomenon of a gradual reduction in stiffness with an increase in the number of loading cycles and displacements is called stiffness degradation. Stiffness can be expressed by the cut-line stiffness of the hysteresis curve under all levels of loading displacements in the presence of horizontal repeated loading, using the following calculation formula:
where
Ki is the cut line stiffness under the action of the loading displacement of the i-th level;
Mi is the peak point bending moment under the action of the loading displacement of the i-th level;
θi is the node turning angle corresponding to
Mi. The rotational stiffness of each node is calculated by Equation (4), as shown in
Figure 16.
As depicted in
Figure 15, the strength degradation curves for each specimen follow a similar pattern. Generally, a more pronounced strength degradation is observed with an increasing number of decay cycles. Before a loading angle of 0.10 rad, the strength degradation factor for all specimens remains above 0.9, signifying that even under smaller loads, the specimens retain a certain level of strength. The strength degradation factor gradually decreases in each specimen as loading displacement increases, with a more significant decline corresponding to higher decay cycles. Under larger loads, specimens with greater decay cycles exhibit a smaller strength degradation factor compared to those with smaller decay cycles. From the loading corner to the initiation of node damage, specimens with a longer decay period experience a more pronounced decrease in the strength degradation factor than specimens with a shorter decay period. This suggests that as the degree of decay in the HHTMJ increases, the specimen’s ability to recover from deformation significantly diminishes at the same loading level. Moreover, the specimen’s strength experiences a more rapid decline in the damage stage, leading to a substantial decrease in its ability to withstand larger loads.
Presented in
Figure 16, the overall trend indicates a gradual reduction in the stiffness degradation of all specimens as the loading level increases. Notably, the stiffness during the positive loading stage proved to be smaller than that in the negative loading stage. Specimen ST-2 features lower specimen stiffness in the preloading stage due to an initial gap. For the remaining specimens, specimen stiffness exhibited an inverse relationship with the decay cycle. Specifically, in comparison to specimen ST-1, specimen ST-5 displayed an initial stiffness degradation of approximately 54.4% in the positive loading stage and 55.7% in the negative loading stage. The specimens experienced a swift decrease in stiffness during the pre-loading stage, with the rate slowing down post-loading to the plastic strengthening stage. Throughout the damage stage, the rate of stiffness degradation escalated, marked by a sudden drop when the specimen suffered more extensive damage. At equivalent loading levels, specimen stiffness decreased with larger decay cycles, and the decrease was more rapid for higher loading levels.
3.4. Energy Dissipation Capacity Degradation
3.4.1. Energy Dissipation Capacity Degradation
The energy dissipation capacity of the HHTMJ is indicated by the envelope area of the hysteresis curve, and the cumulative energy dissipation (
Ec) for the experiment’s mortise-tenon joint is obtained by summing the hysteresis curve’s area [
43]. The results for the cumulative energy dissipation coefficient of the HHTMJ are depicted in
Figure 17 through the calculation of the envelope area of the hysteresis curve. Examination of the figure reveals that, during the pre-loading period, the cumulative energy dissipation of each specimen increases gradually, with the cumulative energy dissipation values for positive and negative loading being essentially symmetrical. With an increase in loading displacement, joint energy dissipation accelerates, reaching its maximum value when loading leads to specimen destruction. In comparison to specimen ST-1, specimens ST-2, ST-3, ST-4, and ST-5 exhibit a decrease in cumulative energy dissipation by 21.6%, 27.4%, 33.2%, and 41.3%, respectively. The occurrence of decay has a more significant impact on the cumulative energy performance degradation of the HHTMJ, while the increase in the degree of decay has a comparatively smaller effect on the cumulative energy performance degradation of the HHTMJ.
3.4.2. Energy Dissipation Degradation
The energy dissipation performance of a joint is expressed using the dimensionless equivalent viscous damping factor
Edc [
44], the larger the value of
Edc, the stronger the energy dissipation performance of the joint. The schematic diagram of the calculation method is shown in
Figure 18, and the calculation formula is as follows:
In the formula,
E is the energy dissipation coefficient;
SABC and
SADG are the envelope area of the hysteresis curve, which is the shaded area in
Figure 18;
SΔDEO is the area of Δ
DEO, and
SΔDEO is the area of Δ
BFO, which is the ideal elastic energy dissipation performance of HHMTJ.
Figure 19 illustrates the energy dissipation coefficients for the first cycle at various loading displacement levels of the specimen, with a similar trend observed in the viscous damping coefficients of all specimens. During the pre-loading phase, there is minimal tenon slip and pullout, resulting in superior energy dissipation performance. With increasing loading displacement, the slip between the tenon and mortise grows, and the rise in extrusion deformation between them during the slip process is less pronounced, leading to a decrease in energy dissipation performance. In the destructive stage, there is a sharp increase in extrusion deformation between the tenon and mortise, enhancing the specimen’s capacity for dissipation. Beyond a loading turn angle of 0.02 rad, the changes in the curve for negative loading become more consistent, attributed to the complexity of tenon slip, extrusion deformation, and damage in positive loading.
In comparison to specimen ST-1, the energy dissipation coefficient is higher during the pre-loading period for the specimen with decay, but it decreases more rapidly as loading displacement increases, especially for specimens with larger decay cycles. This phenomenon is attributed to increased friction between the tenon and mortise after HHTMJ decay, allowing the mortise and tenon to undergo some extrusion deformation during the pre-loading phase, thereby enhancing energy dissipation. As loading displacement rises, tenon slip occurs, leading to a decrease in joint extrusion deformation and a rapid decline in HHTMJ energy dissipation performance. In the destructive stage, the capacity dissipation coefficient experiences a slight increase, with a more noticeable rise for specimens with larger decay cycles. This increase is due to the initiation of plastic deformation and destruction in the HHTMJ as the decay cycle grows. In general, decay and small external loads make the tenon more susceptible to slip, plastic deformation, and damage, thereby diminishing the energy dissipation capacity of the specimens. Nevertheless, after decay, the HHTMJ can still retain a certain energy dissipation capacity under low weekly repeated loads, signifying a positive impact on resistance to seismic impact loads. This is the reason why many Tusi Manor structures in Tibetan areas of Yunnan can withstand various earthquakes over an extended period of time.
3.5. Degradation of HHTMJ Rotation Capacity
According to the provisions in the Technical Standard for Maintenance and Reinforcement of Wooden Structures of Ancient Buildings (GB/50165-2020) [
45], the limit value of the interstorey displacement angle of the wooden structure building is 1/30. In the Tusi Manor in Tibetan areas in Yunnan, the deformation of the internal wooden frame is mainly caused by the deformation of the mortise and tenon nodes, and it can be regarded as the limit value of the rotational performance of the hoop-and-tenon nodes of 1/30. As can be seen from
Figure 13, the node bending moment of specimen ST-5 still rises when the loading angle is 0.12 rad (about 1/8), which indicates that the HHTMJ with decay still has a good rotational performance.
4. The Impact of Mechanical Performance Degradation on the Seismic Degradation of HHTMJ
The degradation data for wood mechanical properties in
Figure 20 and
Figure 21 are extracted from the results in
Table 1.
Ec represents the maximum cumulative energy dissipation degradation rate, while ML represents the rate of ultimate bearing capacity performance degradation.
Figure 20 illustrates a comparison of seismic performance degradation data between small-size transverse compressive specimens subjected to decay treatment, HHTMJ specimens, and transverse compressive specimens sawn from the tenon with HHTMJ specimens. As shown in
Figure 20, the degradation level of small-size transverse grain specimens falls between the cumulative energy dissipation of HHTMJ and the degradation level of ultimate bearing performance, with the degradation levels of these three aspects being relatively close. However, the degradation level of transverse grain specimens obtained from the tenon exterior is less than the preceding three, approaching half of their degradation levels. When comparing the degradation levels of transverse compression strength specimens from the inside and outside of the tenon, it becomes evident that there is almost no decay occurring inside the tenon. It is evident that when the tenon undergoes slight decay, the seismic performance of HHTMJ shows significant degradation, with the degree of degradation being approximately twice that of the transverse compressive strength specimens outside the tenon.
By comparing the degradation level of seismic performance in HHTMJ with the degradation of tensile strength, bending strength, and compressive modulus of elasticity in longitudinal wood, as shown in
Figure 21, the performance of HHTMJ under low-cycle repeated loading can be explained. Within the same decay period, the longitudinal tensile strength of the HHTMJ experiences the most significant decrease. Moreover, as the specimens reach the same rotation angle, the longer the decay period, the more pronounced the increase in cracking at the tension end of the tenon shoulder upon specimen failure. The degradation of bending strength along the grain of wood closely corresponds to the degradation curve of the ultimate load-carrying performance of HHTMJ. This is because the nodal bending moment is primarily supplied by the bending force acting on the wood along the grain direction at the tenon shoulder. Compared to the degradation of other mechanical properties, the degradation of the elastic modulus is relatively small. This is also the reason why the deformation of the tenon and mortise of HHTMJ is minimal after being subjected to force. In the context of Tusi Manor in Tibetan areas in Yunnan, obtaining a comprehensive assessment of HHTMJ is relatively challenging. However, acquiring smaller-sized specimens for testing the mechanical performance of wood is feasible. Based on the previous analysis, the degree of mechanical performance degradation in wooden components outside the tenon is closely correlated with the deterioration of HHTMJ seismic performance. This holds a certain reference value.