Evaluation of Carbon Neutrality Capacity of Regional Construction Industry Based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model
Abstract
:1. Research Purpose
1.1. Research Exploration and Analysis
1.2. The Problem and Significance of the Study
2. Research Status
2.1. The Development and Research Status of Domestic Index System
2.2. The Development of Foreign Index System
3. Carbon Neutrality Capacity Evaluation Mechanism—The Entropy Weight TOPSIS Method
3.1. The Selection of Indicators Should Meet the Overall Requirements
3.2. Collection and Sorting of Indicator Data
3.3. Entropy Weight TOPSIS Evaluation Model
3.3.1. Standardised Processing of Indicator Data
3.3.2. Entropy Value of Carbon Neutrality Capacity Evaluation System Index
3.3.3. Scores of Carbon Neutrality Capacity Evaluation of the Construction Industry in Each Region
4. Analysis and Suggestion of Carbon Neutrality Capacity Evaluation System
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Huang, L.; Deng, S.; Zhou, Z.; Zou, C.; Li, X. Construction of evaluation index system of regional red cultural tourism resources based on G1-entropy weight method. J. Ningde Norm. Univ. 2021, 139, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Chardonnet, J.-R.; Merienne, F. Enhanced cognitive workload evaluation in 3D immersive environments with TOPSIS model. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2021, 147, 102572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Chi, G.; Cheng, Y. Evaluation model of human all-round Development based on entropy weight TOPSIS. J. Syst. Eng. 2011, 26, 400–407. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Fai, L.K.; Lam, W.S.; Lam, W.H. Financial Network Analysis on the Performance of Companies Using Integrated Entropy–DEMATEL–TOPSIS Model. Entropy 2022, 24, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, A.; Fitri, Z.; Zulkifli, Z.; Ula, M.; Suhendra, B. Analysis of the Teacher’s Role in Evaluation of Student Learning Performance Using the TOPSIS Model (Case Study of Smk Negeri 1 Lhokseumawe). J. Inform. Telecommun. Eng. 2022, 5, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aikhuele, D.; Turan, F. An Integrated Fuzzy Dephi and Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy M-Topsis Model for Design Concept Selection. Pak. J. Stat. Oper. Res. 2017, 13, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raihan, A. The contribution of economic development, renewable energy, technical advancements, and forestry to Uruguay’s objective of becoming carbon neutral by 2030. Carbon Res. 2023, 2, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, W.H.; Lam, W.S.; Liew, K.F.; Lee, P.F. Decision Analysis on the Financial Performance of Companies Using Integrated Entropy-Fuzzy TOPSIS Model. Mathematics 2023, 11, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forouzandeh, S.; Rostami, M.; Berahmand, K. A Hybrid Method for Recommendation Systems based on Tourism with an Evolutionary Algorithm and Topsis Model. Fuzzy Inf. Eng. 2022, 14, 26–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y. Forest management based on the TOPSIS model. Highlights Sci. Eng. Technol. 2023, 44, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, J.; Bashir, Z.; Rashid, T. On distance measure and TOPSIS model for probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets: Application to healthcare facilities in public hospitals. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 2021, 12, 197–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, T.; Saha, S.; Das, J.; Sarkar, A. Groundwater depletion susceptibility zonation using TOPSIS model in Bhagirathi river basin, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2021, 8, 1711–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banihashemi, S.A.; Khalilzadeh, M. Evaluating Efficiency in Construction Projects with the TOPSIS Model and NDEA Method Considering Environmental Effects and Undesirable Data. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 2021, 46, 1589–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortíz-Barrios, M.; Petrillo, A.; De Felice, F.; Jaramillo-Rueda, N.; Jiménez-Delgado, G.; Borrero-López, L. A Dispatching-Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Model for Scheduling Flexible Job-Shop Systems in Industry 4.0 Context. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forouzandeh, S.; Berahmand, K.; Nasiri, E.; Rostami, M. A Hotel Recommender System for Tourists Using the Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm and Fuzzy TOPSIS Model: A Case Study of TripAdvisor. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 2020, 20, 399–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pazhuhan, M.; Shiri, N. Regional tourism axes identification using GIS and TOPSIS model (Case study: Hormozgan Province, Iran). J. Tour. Anal. Revista de Análisis Turístico 2020, 27, 119–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oz, N.E.; Mete, S.; Serin, F.; Gul, M. Risk assessment for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: An extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2018, 25, 1615–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yurdakul, M.; İç, Y.T. Comparison of Fuzzy and Crisp Versions of an AHP and TOPSIS Model for Nontraditional Manufacturing Process Ranking Decision. J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 2019, 18, 167–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najafabadi, R.M.; Ramesht, M.H.; Ghazi, I.; Khajedin, S.J.; Seif, A.; Nohegar, A.; Mahdavi, A. Identification of natural hazards and classification of urban areas by TOPSIS model (case study: Bandar Abbas city, Iran). Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2016, 7, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofuoğlu, M.A. A Fuzzy Behavioral TOPSIS Model in Manufacturing Environment. Adv. Eng. Forum 2019, 31, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, A.B.; Krishna, A.P.; Patel, N. Application of Remote Sensing Technology, GIS and AHP-TOPSIS Model to Quantify Urban Landscape Vulnerability to Land Use Transformation; Springer: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Huovila, A.; Siikavirta, H.; Rozado, C.A.; Rökman, J.; Tuominen, P.; Paiho, S.; Hedman, Å; Ylén, P. Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 341, 130912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, L.; Zhang, J.; Song, Q. A scenario analysis of Chinese carbon neutral based on STIRPAT and system dynamics model. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 55105–55130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Dayananda, B.; Fu, B.; Li, Z.; Jia, Z.; Hu, Y.; Cao, J.; Liu, Y.; Xie, L.; Chen, Y.; et al. Research on the Potential of Forestry’s Carbon-Neutral Contribution in China from 2021 to 2060. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallapaty, S. How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century. Nature 2020, 586, 482–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rosa, L.; Sanchez, D.L.; Mazzotti, M. Assessment of carbon dioxide removal potential via BECCS in a carbon-neutral Europe. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 3086–3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maurya, P.K.; Mondal, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, S.P. Roadmap to sustainable carbon-neutral energy and environment: Can we cross the barrier of biomass productivity? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 49327–49342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Algarvio, H. The Role of Local Citizen Energy Communities in the Road to Carbon-Neutral Power Systems: Outcomes from a Case Study in Portugal. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 840–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Causone, F.; Tatti, A.; Alongi, A. From Nearly Zero Energy to Carbon-Neutral: Case Study of a Hospitality Building. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; A review of the current evidence. Environ. Int. 2020, 140, 105661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaka, M.; Walvekar, R.; Rasheed, A.K.; Khalid, M. A review on Malaysia’s solar energy pathway towards carbon-neutral Malaysia beyond COVID-19 pandemic. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ravetz, J.; Neuvonen, A.; Mäntysalo, R. The new normative: Synergistic scenario planning for carbon-neutral cities and regions. Reg. Stud. 2020, 55, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedulli, C.; Lavery, P.S.; Harvey, M.; Duarte, C.M.; Serrano, O. Contribution of Seagrass Blue Carbon Toward Carbon Neutral Policies in a Touristic and Environmentally-Friendly Island. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandova, H.; Patrizio, P.; Leduc, S.; Kjärstad, J.; Wang, C.; Wetterlund, E.; Kraxner, F.; Gale, W. Achieving carbon-neutral iron and steelmaking in Europe through the deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 218, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balany, F.; Muttil, N.; Muthukumaran, S.; Wong, M.S.; Ng, A.W.M. Studying the Effect of Blue-Green Infrastructure on Microclimate and Human Thermal Comfort in Melbourne’s Central Business District. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksulu, I.; Wang, R. Contribution of Integrated Green District Heating to the Sustainable Cities: A Case Study of Ferrara, Italy. In Proceedings of the 2012 Second International Conference on Electric Technology and Civil Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, 18–20 May 2012; pp. 716–719. [Google Scholar]
Criterion Layer | Serial Number | Index Level |
---|---|---|
Thriving businesses | 1 | High-standard occupancy ratio |
2 | Construction of scientific and technological progress contribution rate | |
3 | Level of construction mechanisation | |
4 | Ratio of the processing output value of building materials’ products to total construction output value | |
5 | Leisure construction business income | |
6 | Labour productivity of the construction industry | |
7 | Construction industry land construction rate | |
8 | Modern characteristic construction site demonstration area | |
Liveable life | 9 | Green coverage rate of the residential area |
10 | Proportion of counties and districts that treat construction waste | |
11 | Proportion of counties and districts that reuse construction waste | |
12 | Comprehensive utilisation rate of human and animal manure | |
13 | Penetration rate of harmless toilets in the community | |
Architectural style features | 14 | Coverage rate of comprehensive cultural service centres in counties and districts |
15 | Proportion of county-level and above characteristic buildings | |
16 | Proportion of construction management personnel with bachelor’s degree or above | |
17 | County and district expenditure on energy conservation and emission reduction automation facilities | |
18 | Proportion of households that have been assessed for energy conservation after the residential area has been placed into use | |
Effective governance | 19 | Proportion of collective economic strong areas/counties |
20 | County carbon neutrality planning and management coverage | |
21 | Proportion of counties with carbon neutrality management service projects | |
22 | County grid social governance coverage | |
Energy conservation and emission reduction | 23 | County indoor air monitoring results up to standard rate |
24 | Discharge rate of cooling and heating systems in county and district reaches the standard | |
25 | Engel coefficient of county residents | |
26 | Degree of standardisation of basic carbon neutrality services at the county level | |
Intelligent construction | 27 | Proportion of intelligent construction sites in counties and districts |
28 | Proportion of precast assembly rate in county construction | |
29 | Proportion of construction site adopting intelligent management during construction | |
30 | Proportion of construction sites adopting intelligent technology in property management |
Pioneer County | Proportion of Collective Economic Strong Areas/Counties | Leisure Construction Business Income | County Carbon Neutrality Planning and Management Coverage | County and District Expenditure on Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Automation Facilities | Proportion of Households That Have Been Assessed for Energy Conservation after the Residential Area Has Been Put into Use | Penetration Rate of Harmless Toilets in the Community | Proportion of Counties and Districts That Reuse Construction Waste | Construction of Scientific and Technological Progress Contribution Rate | Proportion of Precast Assembly Rate in County Construction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jiaojiang District, Taizhou | 0.64 | 0.35 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 1.01 | 0.68 | 0.73 |
Huangyan District, Taizhou | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 0.68 | 0.85 | 0.15 | 0.21 |
Road Bridge District Taizhou | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.30 | 0.92 |
Tiantai County, Taizhou | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.98 | 0.38 | 0.12 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.22 |
Wenling City, Taizhou | 0.58 | 0.19 | 0.61 | 0.51 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.26 |
Lucheng District, Wenzhou | 0.52 | 0.35 | 0.88 | 0.46 | 0.27 | 1.01 | 0.43 | 0.71 | 0.23 |
Longwan District, Wenzhou | 0.62 | 0.05 | 0.81 | 0.17 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
Cangnan County, Wenzhou | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.88 | 0.42 | 0.15 | 0.82 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.61 |
Taishun County, Wenzhou | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.81 | 0.21 | 1.01 | 0.92 |
Longgang City, Wenzhou | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0 | 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.74 | 0.05 | 0.62 | 0.68 |
Nanhu District, Jiaxing | 0.99 | 0.51 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 0.94 |
Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.27 | 0.87 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.23 |
Jiashan County, Jiaxing | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.70 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
Pinghu City, Jiaxing | 0.51 | 0.52 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.16 | 0.87 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
Haining City, Jiaxing | 0.02 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
Index Level | Diversity Factor | Weight Coefficient |
---|---|---|
Proportion of collective economic strong areas/counties | 0.0204 | 0.3022 |
Leisure construction business income | 0.0046 | 0.0696 |
County carbon neutrality planning and management coverage | 0.0010 | 0.0171 |
County and district expenditure on energy conservation and emission reduction automation facilities | 0.0090 | 0.1182 |
Proportion of households that have been assessed for energy conservation after the residential area has been put into use | 0.0116 | 0.1755 |
Penetration rate of harmless toilets in the community | 0.0032 | 0.0458 |
County–area comparison of the recycling of construction waste | 0.0032 | 0.0437 |
Construction of scientific and technological progress contribution rate | 0.0043 | 0.0650 |
Proportion of precast assembly rate in county construction | 0.0108 | 0.1610 |
Pioneer County | Proportion of Collective Economic Strong Areas/Counties | Leisure Construction Business Income | County Carbon Neutrality Planning and Management Coverage | County and District Expenditure on Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Automation Facilities | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jiaojiang District, Taizhou | 0.1050 | 0.0170 | 0.0522 | 0.0309 | |||||
Huangyan District, Taizhou | 0.0831 | 0.0247 | 0.0593 | 0.0278 | |||||
Road Bridge District, Taizhou | 0.0732 | 0.0228 | 0.0596 | 0.0345 | |||||
Tiantai County, Taizhou | 0.1448 | 0.0352 | 0.0644 | 0.0165 | |||||
Wenling City, Taizhou | 0.0910 | 0.0091 | 0.0392 | 0.0222 | |||||
Lucheng District, Wenzhou | 0.0846 | 0.0163 | 0.0568 | 0.0196 | |||||
Longwan District, Wenzhou | 0.1023 | 0.0018 | 0.0527 | 0.0067 | |||||
Cangnan County, Wenzhou | 0.1134 | 0.0271 | 0.0579 | 0.0175 | |||||
Taishun County, Wenzhou | 0.0702 | 0.0002 | 0.0331 | 0.0202 | |||||
Longgang City, Wenzhou | 0.1528 | 0.0124 | 0.0004 | 0.0276 | |||||
Nanhu District, Jiaxing | 0.1605 | 0.0233 | 0.0548 | 0.0003 | |||||
Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing | 0.0858 | 0.0285 | 0.0579 | 0.0398 | |||||
Jiashan County, Jiaxing | 0.0899 | 0.0464 | 0.0312 | 0.0433 | |||||
Pinghu City, Jiaxing | 0.0802 | 0.0244 | 0.0652 | 0.0348 | |||||
Haining City, Jiaxing | 0.0000 | 0.0207 | 0.0392 | 0.0248 | |||||
Pioneer County | Proportion of Households That Have Been Assessed for Energy Conservation after the Residential Area Has Been Put into Use | Penetration Rate of Harmless Toilets in the Community | County–Area Comparison of the Recycling of Construction Waste | Construction of Scientific and Technological Progress Contribution Rate | Proportion of Precast Assembly Rate in County Construction | ||||
Jiaojiang District, Taizhou | 0.0525 | 0.0883 | 0.0175 | 0.4755 | 0.2235 | ||||
Huangyan District, Taizhou | 0.0492 | 0.0782 | 0.0144 | 0.1120 | 0.0602 | ||||
Road Bridge District, Taizhou | 0.0348 | 0.0977 | 0.0124 | 0.2204 | 0.2742 | ||||
Tiantai County, Taizhou | 0.0227 | 0.9438 | 0.0124 | 0.5489 | 0.0636 | ||||
Wenling City, Taizhou | 0.0452 | 0.0185 | 0.0133 | 0.4422 | 0.0751 | ||||
Lucheng District, Wenzhou | 0.0487 | 0.1183 | 0.0072 | 0.4827 | 0.0662 | ||||
Longwan District, Wenzhou | 0.1752 | 0.1167 | 0.0103 | 0.5522 | 0.0301 | ||||
Cangnan County, Wenzhou | 0.0281 | 0.0976 | 0.0087 | 0.4789 | 0.1873 | ||||
Taishun County, Wenzhou | 0.0473 | 0.0978 | 0.0036 | 0.6903 | 0.2855 | ||||
Longgang City, Wenzhou | 0.0438 | 0.0882 | 0.0005 | 0.4412 | 0.2024 | ||||
Nanhu District, Jiaxing | 0.0437 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.4001 | 0.2814 | ||||
Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing | 0.0492 | 0.1051 | 0.0085 | 0.2825 | 0.0721 | ||||
Jiashan County, Jiaxing | 0.0000 | 0.0835 | 0.0022 | 0.0438 | 0.0000 | ||||
Pinghu City, Jiaxing | 0.0287 | 0.1037 | 0.0094 | 0.0000 | 0.1049 | ||||
Haining City, Jiaxing | 0.0692 | 0.1002 | 0.0123 | 0.5521 | 0.2448 |
Pioneer County | Distance to the Positive Ideal Solution | Distance to the Negative Ideal Solution |
---|---|---|
Jiaojiang District, Taizhou | 0.251 | 0.402 |
Huangyan District, Taizhou | 0.402 | 0.275 |
Road Bridge District, Taizhou | 0.288 | 0.432 |
Tiantai County, Taizhou | 0.392 | 0.367 |
Wenling City, Taizhou | 0.410 | 0.248 |
Lucheng District, Wenzhou | 0.382 | 0.322 |
Longwan District, Wenzhou | 0.122 | 0.559 |
Cangnan County, Wenzhou | 0.289 | 0.392 |
Taishun County, Wenzhou | 0.277 | 0.447 |
Longgang City, Wenzhou | 0.281 | 0.421 |
Nanhu District, Jiaxing | 0.312 | 0.488 |
Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing | 0.381 | 0.317 |
Jiashan County, Jiaxing | 0.512 | 0.240 |
Pinghu City, Jiaxing | 0.381 | 0.317 |
Haining City, Jiaxing | 0.342 | 0.391 |
Pioneer County | Score |
---|---|
Jiaojiang District, Taizhou | 0.798 |
Huangyan District, Taizhou | 0.620 |
Cangnan County, Wenzhou | 0.615 |
Lucheng District, Wenzhou | 0.602 |
Nanhu District, Jiaxing | 0.600 |
Longwan District, Wenzhou | 0.595 |
Jiashan County, Jiaxing | 0.564 |
Road Bridge District Taizhou | 0.522 |
Taishun County, Wenzhou | 0.472 |
Tiantai County, Taizhou | 0.462 |
Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing | 0.449 |
Wenling City, Taizhou | 0.443 |
Longgang City, Wenzhou | 0.396 |
Haining City, Jiaxing | 0.371 |
Pinghu City, Jiaxing | 0.321 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shen, Z.; Min, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Evaluation of Carbon Neutrality Capacity of Regional Construction Industry Based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model. Buildings 2024, 14, 2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082363
Shen Z, Min H, Wang L, Zhang Y. Evaluation of Carbon Neutrality Capacity of Regional Construction Industry Based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model. Buildings. 2024; 14(8):2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082363
Chicago/Turabian StyleShen, Zizhen, Hong Min, Lianbo Wang, and Yongcheng Zhang. 2024. "Evaluation of Carbon Neutrality Capacity of Regional Construction Industry Based on the Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model" Buildings 14, no. 8: 2363. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082363