Figure 1.
Views of a Hanok village and a Hanok: (A) Jeonju Hanok Village, the city’s center; (B) Jeonju Dongheon, located within Jeonju Hanok Village, a restored building that served as the local government office during the Joseon Dynasty.
Figure 1.
Views of a Hanok village and a Hanok: (A) Jeonju Hanok Village, the city’s center; (B) Jeonju Dongheon, located within Jeonju Hanok Village, a restored building that served as the local government office during the Joseon Dynasty.
Figure 2.
Comparison of the proportions of Hanoks: (A) Hanok-style concrete building; (B) Traditional Hanok made mainly of wood. Although (A,B) are made of different materials, the column section in (A) is disproportionately larger than (B)’s. In this case, the structural forms are similar, but the proportional parts are not reflected at all. In proportion to the height of the frame and the roof in (A), the roof is designed to be relatively low compared to the height of the frame.
Figure 2.
Comparison of the proportions of Hanoks: (A) Hanok-style concrete building; (B) Traditional Hanok made mainly of wood. Although (A,B) are made of different materials, the column section in (A) is disproportionately larger than (B)’s. In this case, the structural forms are similar, but the proportional parts are not reflected at all. In proportion to the height of the frame and the roof in (A), the roof is designed to be relatively low compared to the height of the frame.
Figure 3.
Structural area of a Hanok (National Treasure Geungnakjeon Hall of Hwaamsa Temple, Wanju) [
8]. A Hanok can be classified into a roof, Gongpo, and structural framework. This study used terms based on this classification.
Figure 3.
Structural area of a Hanok (National Treasure Geungnakjeon Hall of Hwaamsa Temple, Wanju) [
8]. A Hanok can be classified into a roof, Gongpo, and structural framework. This study used terms based on this classification.
Figure 4.
Attributes of a Hanok floor plan [
10]. A Kan is a unit that is used to indicate the dimensions of a floor plan, with its area delineated by columns. It is commonly expressed as 3 Kans in the front and 3 Kans on the side or simply as 3 × 3 when specifying dimensions. In this configuration, the total number of Kans is 9.
Figure 4.
Attributes of a Hanok floor plan [
10]. A Kan is a unit that is used to indicate the dimensions of a floor plan, with its area delineated by columns. It is commonly expressed as 3 Kans in the front and 3 Kans on the side or simply as 3 × 3 when specifying dimensions. In this configuration, the total number of Kans is 9.
Figure 5.
Space changes in a Hanok [
11]. A floor plan and façade of a Hanok. The yellow area represents the originally planned space, whereas the green area indicates the expanded space.
Figure 5.
Space changes in a Hanok [
11]. A floor plan and façade of a Hanok. The yellow area represents the originally planned space, whereas the green area indicates the expanded space.
Figure 6.
Hanoks’ façade proportions [
12]. These façades compare the proportion of Hanoks. (
B) depicts the current façade, whereas (
A) shows a form lowered from the original, and (
C) illustrates a form heightened from the original.
Figure 6.
Hanoks’ façade proportions [
12]. These façades compare the proportion of Hanoks. (
B) depicts the current façade, whereas (
A) shows a form lowered from the original, and (
C) illustrates a form heightened from the original.
Figure 7.
The ratio of a Hanok’s cross-section [
13,
14]. The figure compares cross-sectional drawings of Hanoks of varying scales. Structure A and Structure B are constructed in different periods and regions. Despite differences in size, they exhibit a similar ratio in their overall forms. Structure A is the Daegwangjeon Hall of Sinheungsa Temple in Yangsan (Joseon Dynasty; Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do), whereas Structure B is the Jeokgwangjeon Hall of Bogyeongsa Temple in Pohang (Silla Dynasty; Pohang, Gyeongsangbuk-do).
Figure 7.
The ratio of a Hanok’s cross-section [
13,
14]. The figure compares cross-sectional drawings of Hanoks of varying scales. Structure A and Structure B are constructed in different periods and regions. Despite differences in size, they exhibit a similar ratio in their overall forms. Structure A is the Daegwangjeon Hall of Sinheungsa Temple in Yangsan (Joseon Dynasty; Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do), whereas Structure B is the Jeokgwangjeon Hall of Bogyeongsa Temple in Pohang (Silla Dynasty; Pohang, Gyeongsangbuk-do).
Figure 8.
Current Hanok design process [
17]. The figure depicts the Hanok design process, which is similar to the modern architecture process.
Figure 8.
Current Hanok design process [
17]. The figure depicts the Hanok design process, which is similar to the modern architecture process.
Figure 9.
Research flowchart comprising five stages, detailing the analysis process and specifying the data extracted at individual stages.
Figure 9.
Research flowchart comprising five stages, detailing the analysis process and specifying the data extracted at individual stages.
Figure 10.
Experiment method. Each experimental stage is comprehensively demonstrated.
Figure 10.
Experiment method. Each experimental stage is comprehensively demonstrated.
Figure 11.
Extracting floor plan data [
19]. A floor plan of one studied Hanok. The circular shapes along the perimeter represent column sections, while the red lines indicate the central axes of the floor plan.
Figure 11.
Extracting floor plan data [
19]. A floor plan of one studied Hanok. The circular shapes along the perimeter represent column sections, while the red lines indicate the central axes of the floor plan.
Figure 12.
Hanok module composition based on column arrangements. The grid depicts a module of a Hanok floor plan, with each black dot indicating the position of a column along an exterior wall. The numbers between each column indicate the number of Hanok Kans.
Figure 12.
Hanok module composition based on column arrangements. The grid depicts a module of a Hanok floor plan, with each black dot indicating the position of a column along an exterior wall. The numbers between each column indicate the number of Hanok Kans.
Figure 13.
Comparing the areas (m2) of the investigated Hanok. The floor plan modules are indicated by 3 × 2, 3 × 3, 3 × 4, 4 × 3, 5 × 3, and 7 × 3, and the graphs compare the minimum, maximum, and average area of the Hanoks that belong to each module.
Figure 13.
Comparing the areas (m2) of the investigated Hanok. The floor plan modules are indicated by 3 × 2, 3 × 3, 3 × 4, 4 × 3, 5 × 3, and 7 × 3, and the graphs compare the minimum, maximum, and average area of the Hanoks that belong to each module.
Figure 14.
Hanok cross-section measurement locations [
20]. The figure depicts the longitudinal cross-section and façade of a Hanok, with measurement locations indicated. The numbers within the circles in the cross-section represent the numbers of Dori, while the green area on the façade represents the visible area based on the measurement locations in the cross-section.
Figure 14.
Hanok cross-section measurement locations [
20]. The figure depicts the longitudinal cross-section and façade of a Hanok, with measurement locations indicated. The numbers within the circles in the cross-section represent the numbers of Dori, while the green area on the façade represents the visible area based on the measurement locations in the cross-section.
Figure 15.
Cross-sectional frame structures. The figures are cross-sectional drawings. The black dots represent the cross-sections of the Dori, and the numbers above them indicate the numbers of Dori. Based on these numbers, the structures are categorized as 5-, 6-, 7-, or 9-Ryang structures.
Figure 15.
Cross-sectional frame structures. The figures are cross-sectional drawings. The black dots represent the cross-sections of the Dori, and the numbers above them indicate the numbers of Dori. Based on these numbers, the structures are categorized as 5-, 6-, 7-, or 9-Ryang structures.
Figure 16.
Side widths of frame structures. These are the measured side widths of the Hanoks, categorized into 5-Ryang, 6-Ryang, 7-Ryang, and 9-Ryang. The minimum, maximum, and average lengths were calculated.
Figure 16.
Side widths of frame structures. These are the measured side widths of the Hanoks, categorized into 5-Ryang, 6-Ryang, 7-Ryang, and 9-Ryang. The minimum, maximum, and average lengths were calculated.
Figure 17.
Locations where Hanok frame structure widths and heights were measured: (a) Measuring the overall proportions in the Hanok; (b) computing the proportions of the body part; (c) identifying the relationship between the side width and the roof height; and (d) computing the proportion between the body part and the roof height.
Figure 17.
Locations where Hanok frame structure widths and heights were measured: (a) Measuring the overall proportions in the Hanok; (b) computing the proportions of the body part; (c) identifying the relationship between the side width and the roof height; and (d) computing the proportion between the body part and the roof height.
Figure 18.
Dividing the façade into three elements and measuring their surface areas. Individual areas in the front elevation views were assigned specific colors, and their respective surface areas were calculated and graphically represented. This elevation of the data extraction process is Daeungjeon Hall of Daegoksa Temple, Uiseong [
12].
Figure 18.
Dividing the façade into three elements and measuring their surface areas. Individual areas in the front elevation views were assigned specific colors, and their respective surface areas were calculated and graphically represented. This elevation of the data extraction process is Daeungjeon Hall of Daegoksa Temple, Uiseong [
12].
Figure 19.
Surface area proportions of the investigated Hanoks. The figure illustrates the proportional surface areas of frames, Gongpos, and roofs among the 61 studied Hanoks. In the figure, red represents frames, yellow indicates Gongpos, and green denotes roof areas.
Figure 19.
Surface area proportions of the investigated Hanoks. The figure illustrates the proportional surface areas of frames, Gongpos, and roofs among the 61 studied Hanoks. In the figure, red represents frames, yellow indicates Gongpos, and green denotes roof areas.
Figure 20.
Surface area proportions of frames, Gongpos, and roofs by frame structures. Average surface area proportions for the 5-Ryang, 6-Ryang, 7-Ryang, and 9-Ryang structures are depicted, with the overall average representing the combined area proportions of all these structures.
Figure 20.
Surface area proportions of frames, Gongpos, and roofs by frame structures. Average surface area proportions for the 5-Ryang, 6-Ryang, 7-Ryang, and 9-Ryang structures are depicted, with the overall average representing the combined area proportions of all these structures.
Figure 21.
Floor plan ratios based on the x and y-axes. The y-axis width standard represents the average ratio of the front length based on the side length. In contrast, the x-axis width standard represents the average side length ratio based on the front width.
Figure 21.
Floor plan ratios based on the x and y-axes. The y-axis width standard represents the average ratio of the front length based on the side length. In contrast, the x-axis width standard represents the average side length ratio based on the front width.
Figure 22.
Categorization of Hanok floor plans. Each black dot indicates a column along a Hanok’s exterior wall, while each green dot represents an internal column. The blue backgrounds in the indicated floor plan demonstrate the form where the number of Kans has increased. A0 and A1 in blue font indicate floor plan categorization, whereas x1 and x2 following them represent the number of Kans added in the x-axis direction. The numbers on the right side of the figure correspond to the investigated Hanoks’ identifiable numbers.
Figure 22.
Categorization of Hanok floor plans. Each black dot indicates a column along a Hanok’s exterior wall, while each green dot represents an internal column. The blue backgrounds in the indicated floor plan demonstrate the form where the number of Kans has increased. A0 and A1 in blue font indicate floor plan categorization, whereas x1 and x2 following them represent the number of Kans added in the x-axis direction. The numbers on the right side of the figure correspond to the investigated Hanoks’ identifiable numbers.
Figure 23.
Categorizing cross-sectional structures (frame types). Hanoks’ cross-sectional structures (frame types) were synthesized and categorized. Blue lines represent the Daedlebos, while yellow lines denote Toetbo, where two beams are connected rather than one beam spanning. Red lines indicate internal columns.
Figure 23.
Categorizing cross-sectional structures (frame types). Hanoks’ cross-sectional structures (frame types) were synthesized and categorized. Blue lines represent the Daedlebos, while yellow lines denote Toetbo, where two beams are connected rather than one beam spanning. Red lines indicate internal columns.
Figure 24.
Cross-sectional view of a Hanok roof component [
23]. The figure depicts a cross-sectional view of a Hanok; blue is the Daedlebo, and yellow is the Toetbo.
Figure 24.
Cross-sectional view of a Hanok roof component [
23]. The figure depicts a cross-sectional view of a Hanok; blue is the Daedlebo, and yellow is the Toetbo.
Figure 25.
Joint of a Daedlebo and Toetbo [
24]. The figure illustrates a separated joint between a Daedlebo and Toetbo; areas where potential future issues may arise should be identified and incorporated into Hanok planning.
Figure 25.
Joint of a Daedlebo and Toetbo [
24]. The figure illustrates a separated joint between a Daedlebo and Toetbo; areas where potential future issues may arise should be identified and incorporated into Hanok planning.
Figure 26.
Proportions of exposed roofs and Gongpos in the studied 61 Hanoks. The figure illustrates the proportional surface areas of Gongpos and roofs across the 61 investigated Hanoks. Yellow represents Gongpo areas, whereas green indicates roof areas.
Figure 26.
Proportions of exposed roofs and Gongpos in the studied 61 Hanoks. The figure illustrates the proportional surface areas of Gongpos and roofs across the 61 investigated Hanoks. Yellow represents Gongpo areas, whereas green indicates roof areas.
Figure 27.
Comprehensive Hanok floor plan, cross-section, and façade planning. The figure depicts the results of investigating types in floor plans, cross-sections, and façades (Gongpos and roofs).
Figure 27.
Comprehensive Hanok floor plan, cross-section, and façade planning. The figure depicts the results of investigating types in floor plans, cross-sections, and façades (Gongpos and roofs).
Table 1.
List of the studied Hanoks.
Table 1.
List of the studied Hanoks.
No. | Cultural Heritage Name | No. | Cultural Heritage Name |
---|
01 | Gangjin muwisa geungnakbojeon | 32 | Cheongju ansimsa daeungjeon |
02 | Yeongcheon eunhaesa geojoam yeongsanjeon | 33 | Uljin buryeongsa eungjinjeon |
03 | Andong bongjeongsa geungnakjeon | 34 | Yeongcheon eunhaesa baekeungam geungnakjeon |
04 | Yeongju buseoksa muryangsujeon | 35 | Gongju magoksa daegwangbojeon |
05 | Yesan sudeoksa daeungjeon | 36 | Gochang seonunsa chamdangam daeungjeon |
06 | Suncheon songgwangsa guksajeon | 37 | Suncheon jeonghyesa daeungjeon |
07 | Andong bongjeongsa daeungjeon | 38 | Anseong cheongnyongsa daeungjeon |
08 | Wanju hwaamsa geungnakjeon | 39 | Iksan sungnimsa bogwangjeon |
09 | Seosan gaesimsa daeungjeon | 40 | Gimje geumsansa daejangjeon |
10 | Yecheon yongmunsa daejangjeon | 41 | Yeonggwang bulgapsa daeungjeon |
11 | Ganghwa jeongsusa beopdang | 42 | Cheongdo daebisa daeungjeon |
12 | Cheongyang janggoksa sangdaeungjeon | 43 | Cheongdo unmunsa daeungbojeon |
13 | Ganghwa jeondeungsa daeungjeon | 44 | Cheongdo daejeoksa geungnakjeon |
14 | Ganghwa jeondeungsa yaksajeon | 45 | Boeun beopjusa wontongbojeon |
15 | Cheongyang janggoksa hadaeungjeon | 46 | Haenam mihwangsa daeungjeon |
16 | Changnyeong gwallyongsa daeungjeon | 47 | Yangsan sinheungsa daegwangjeon |
17 | Suncheon songgwangsa hasadang | 48 | Haenam mihwangsa eungjindang |
18 | Gochang seonunsa daeungjeon | 49 | Uljin buryeongsa daeungbojeon |
19 | Buan naesosa daeungbojeon | 50 | Wanju songgwangsa daeungjeon |
20 | Buan gaeamsa daeungjeon | 51 | Goheung neunggasa daeungjeon |
21 | Gurye hwaeomsa daeungjeon | 52 | Naju bulhoesa daeungjeon |
22 | Suncheon songgwangsa yeongsanjeon | 53 | Suncheon seonamsa daeungjeon |
23 | Sancheong yulgoksa daeungjeon | 54 | Cheongsong daejeonsa bogwangjeon |
24 | Yeosu heungguksa daeungjeon | 55 | Gimcheon jikjisa daeungjeon |
25 | Hongseong gosansa daeungjeon | 56 | Gijang jangansa daeungjeon |
26 | Nonsan ssanggyesa daeungjeon | 57 | Haenam daeheungsa cheonbuljeon |
27 | Busan beomeosa daeungjeon | 58 | Yangsan tongdosa yeongsanjeon |
28 | Andong bongjeongsa hwaeomgangdang | 59 | Yangsan tongdosa daegwangmyeongjeon |
29 | Andong bongjeongsa gogeumdang | 60 | Uiseong daegoksa daeungjeon |
30 | Hadong ssanggyesa daeungjeon | 61 | Pohang bogyeongsa jeokgwangjeon |
31 | Wanju wibongsa bogwangmyeongjeon | |
Table 2.
Floor plan modules of the investigated Hanoks (width × length).
Table 2.
Floor plan modules of the investigated Hanoks (width × length).
Module | 3 × 2 | 3 × 3 | 3 × 4 | 4 × 3 | 5 × 3 | 7 × 3 | Total |
---|
Number of Hanoks | 15 | 29 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 61 |
Proportions | 24.6% | 47.5% | 6.6% | 3.3% | 16.4% | 1.6% | 100% |
Table 3.
Average length of the investigated Hanoks (x-axis × y-axis).
Table 3.
Average length of the investigated Hanoks (x-axis × y-axis).
Module | 3 × 2 | 3 × 3 | 3 × 4 | 4 × 3 | 5 × 3 | 7 × 3 |
---|
x-axis | Minimum length (mm) | 5667 | 6382 | 8754 | 7912 | 13,634 | 31,160 |
Maximum length (mm) | 12,481 | 15,708 | 14,232 | 10,894 | 21,363 | 31,160 |
Average length (mm) | 8980 | 11,148 | 11,658 | 9403 | 17,794 | 31,160 |
y-axis | Minimum length (mm) | 3793 | 5029 | 6996 | 4216 | 8550 | 10,385 |
Maximum length (mm) | 7710 | 11,945 | 10,781 | 4713 | 11,511 | 10,385 |
Average length (mm) | 5639 | 8060 | 8866 | 4465 | 10,069 | 10,385 |
Table 4.
Numbers of Hanoks by frame structure types.
Table 4.
Numbers of Hanoks by frame structure types.
Frame Structure | 5-Ryang | 6-Ryang | 7-Ryang | 9-Ryang | Total |
---|
Number of Hanoks | 44 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 61 |
Proportion | 72.1% | 1.6% | 23.0% | 3.3% | 100% |
Table 5.
Widths (A) and heights (B) of the overall Hanok cross-sections.
Table 5.
Widths (A) and heights (B) of the overall Hanok cross-sections.
Figure | Frame Structure | 5-Ryang | 6-Ryang | 7-Ryang | 9-Ryang |
---|
![Buildings 14 02397 i001]() | A | Minimum width (mm) | 3793 | 8303 | 6996 | 10,781 |
Maximum width (mm) | 10,385 | 8303 | 11,945 | 11,511 |
Average width (mm) | 6940 | 8303 | 9754 | 11,146 |
B | Minimum width (mm) | 5335 | 7350 | 7045 | 9555 |
Maximum width (mm) | 10,974 | 7350 | 12,217 | 9880 |
Average width (mm) | 8341 | 7350 | 10,567 | 9718 |
Average slenderness ratio (W:H) | 1:1.20 | 1:0.89 | 1:1.08 | 1:0.87 |
Table 6.
Ratios of overall widths and heights of cross-sections based on frame structure classification.
Table 6.
Ratios of overall widths and heights of cross-sections based on frame structure classification.
Slenderness Ratio (A:B) | 1:0.9 | 1:1.0 | 1:1.1 | 1:1.2 | 1:1.3 | 1:1.4 | 1:1.5 | 1:1.6 | 1:1.7 |
---|
5-Ryang | 2 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
6-Ryang | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
7-Ryang | 1 | 5 | 2 | 5 | - | 1 | - | - | - |
9-Ryang | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 6 | 9 | 9 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Table 7.
Hanok cross-sectional widths (A) and heights of frame structures and Gongpos combined (C) of Hanoks.
Table 7.
Hanok cross-sectional widths (A) and heights of frame structures and Gongpos combined (C) of Hanoks.
Figure | Frame Structure | 5-Ryang | 6-Ryang | 7-Ryang | 9-Ryang |
---|
![Buildings 14 02397 i002]() | A | Minimum width (mm) | 3793 | 8303 | 6996 | 10,781 |
Maximum height (mm) | 10,385 | 8303 | 11,945 | 11,511 |
Average height (mm) | 6940 | 8303 | 9754 | 11,146 |
C | Minimum height (mm) | 2507 | 3799 | 3763 | 4831 |
Maximum height (mm) | 5698 | 3799 | 6502 | 4850 |
Average height (mm) | 4399 | 3799 | 5432 | 4841 |
Average slenderness ratio (A:C) | 1:0.63 | 1:0.46 | 1:0.56 | 1:0.43 |
Table 8.
Ratios of cross-sectional widths and the combined heights of frames and Gongpos by frame structures.
Table 8.
Ratios of cross-sectional widths and the combined heights of frames and Gongpos by frame structures.
Slenderness Ratio (A:C) | 1:0.4 | 1:0.5 | 1:0.6 | 1:0.7 | 1:0.8 | 1:0.9 | 1:1.0 |
---|
5-Ryang | 1 | 7 | 15 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
6-Ryang | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
7-Ryang | 1 | 4 | 7 | 2 | - | - | - |
9-Ryang | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 4 | 12 | 22 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
Table 9.
Cross-section widths (A) and roof heights (D) of the Hanoks.
Table 9.
Cross-section widths (A) and roof heights (D) of the Hanoks.
Figure | Frame Structure | 5-Ryang | 6-Ryang | 7-Ryang | 9-Ryang |
---|
![Buildings 14 02397 i003]() | A | Minimum height (mm) | 3793 | 8303 | 6996 | 10,781 |
Maximum height (mm) | 10,385 | 8303 | 11,945 | 11,511 |
Average height (mm) | 6940 | 8303 | 9754 | 11,146 |
D | Minimum height (mm) | 1826 | 3551 | 3282 | 4705 |
Maximum height (mm) | 5674 | 3551 | 6010 | 5049 |
Average height (mm) | 3928 | 3551 | 5152 | 4877 |
Average slenderness ratio (A:D) | 1:0.56 | 1:0.43 | 1:0.53 | 1:0.43 |
Table 10.
Ratios of frame parts and roof heights by frame structures.
Table 10.
Ratios of frame parts and roof heights by frame structures.
Slenderness Ratio (C:D) | 1:0.4 | 1:0.5 | 1:0.6 | 1:0.7 | 1:0.8 |
---|
5-Ryang | 2 | 11 | 26 | 4 | 1 |
6-Ryang | 1 | - | - | - | - |
7-Ryang | - | 9 | 4 | 1 | - |
9-Ryang | 2 | - | - | - | - |
Total | 5 | 20 | 30 | 5 | 1 |
Table 11.
Heights of the frame and Gongpo combined(C) and heights of the roof(D) of Hanoks.
Table 11.
Heights of the frame and Gongpo combined(C) and heights of the roof(D) of Hanoks.
Figure | Frame Structure | 5-Ryang | 6-Ryang | 7-Ryang | 9-Ryang |
---|
![Buildings 14 02397 i004]() | D | Minimum height (mm) | 1826 | 3551 | 3282 | 4705 |
Maximum height (mm) | 5674 | 3551 | 6010 | 5049 |
Average height (mm) | 3928 | 3551 | 5152 | 4877 |
C | Minimum height (mm) | 2507 | 3799 | 3763 | 4831 |
Maximum height (mm) | 5698 | 3799 | 6502 | 4850 |
Average height (mm) | 4399 | 3799 | 5432 | 4841 |
Average slenderness ratio (C:D) | 1:0.89 | 1:0.93 | 1:0.95 | 1:1 |
Table 12.
Height ratios of frame components and roof components by frame structures.
Table 12.
Height ratios of frame components and roof components by frame structures.
Slenderness Ratio (C:D) | 1:0.4 | 1:0.7 | 1:0.8 | 1:0.9 | 1:1.0 | 1:1.1 | 1:1.2 | 1:1.3 |
---|
5-Ryang | 1 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
6-Ryang | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
7-Ryang | - | - | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | - |
9-Ryang | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - |
Total | 1 | 2 | 16 | 16 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 |