Evaluation of the Usability of SCMs Produced by Adding Aluminum and Iron Oxide to Mortar Waste Powder Under Different Conditions
Abstract
1. Introduction
- Evaluating combined Al2O3 and Fe2O3 reinforcement in MWP-based self-compacting systems;
- Assessing their durability under saltwater exposure;
- Linking microstructural evolution to mechanical and durability properties.
- Fresh-state properties (mini-slump flow diameter, V-funnel time);
- Mechanical performance (compressive and flexural strength);
- Durability indicators (abrasion resistance and porosity);
- Different environmental regimes.
2. Experimental Program
2.1. Materials
2.2. Mixture Proportioning and Sample Preparation
3. Sample Preparation
3.1. Flexural Strength Test
3.2. Compressive Strength Test
3.3. Mechanical Test After High Temperature
3.4. Mechanical Test After Freeze–Thaw Cycles
3.5. Porosity and Specific Gravity Tests
- Msat = saturated surface-dry mass (g)
- Mdry = oven-dried mass (g)
- Msub = submerged mass in water (g)
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Fresh State Test Results
4.2. Compressive Strength Test
- Reduced clinker content, limiting long-term C-S-H formation;
- Inert crystalline phases in MWP that dilute reactivity;
- Elevated porosity and microcracking.
4.3. Flexural Strength Test
4.4. Compressive Strength Test After High Temperature
4.5. Flexural Strength Test After High Temperature
4.6. Compressive Strength Test After Freeze–Thaw Cycles
4.7. Flexural Strength Test After Freeze–Thaw Cycles
4.8. Porosity and Specific Gravity Tests
4.9. XRD Results of Samples
5. Conclusions
- In fresh-state assessments, slump flow decreased modestly from 259 mm (control) to 240 mm (50% MWP), while V-funnel times improved from 10.51 s to 7.01 s, suggesting enhanced flowability due to reduced paste viscosity at higher substitution rates. However, the best rheological performance was maintained in oxide-reinforced mixes up to 10% MWP.
- Compressive strength at 28 days reached 75.62 MPa in SCM2 (5% MWP + oxides), exceeding the control (76.58 MPa) and confirming the beneficial role of Al2O3 in accelerating hydration and Fe2O3 in stabilizing microstructure. Beyond 25% substitution, strength values declined sharply—SCM11 (50% MWP) dropped to 34.83 MPa. A similar trend was seen in flexural strength, with SCM2 reaching 13.74 MPa compared to 12.91 MPa in the control, while SCM11 reduced to 7.11 MPa.
- Durability under thermal and freeze–thaw conditions reinforced these findings. SCM2 retained over 87 MPa compressive strength at 300 °C and maintained performance after 100 freeze–thaw cycles with only ~2% degradation. In contrast, high-MWP mixes like SCM11 exhibited over 50% strength loss under the same conditions.
- Porosity remained nearly constant in SCM2 (16.1%) relative to the control (16.0%), whereas SCM11 showed a marked increase to 20.0%, indicating greater permeability and lower durability. Specific gravity trends supported these observations, peaking in SCM2 at 2.219 g/cm3 and decreasing with higher substitution levels.
- Overall, the combination of recycled MWP with low-dosage Al2O3 and Fe2O3 presents a viable strategy for developing sustainable, high-performance SCMs. The oxide additives offset the limitations of MWP by refining pore structure, accelerating hydration, and improving strength retention under harsh conditions. Optimal performance was consistently observed at 5–10% MWP replacement.
- The optimum MWP ratio (with added Al2O3 and Fe2O3 additives) is 10–15%. When MWP and Al2O3 and Fe2O3 additive content are limited to 10–15%, the most efficient results are obtained in terms of both mechanical performance (compressive and flexural strength) and fresh consistency properties.
- Al2O3 and Fe2O3 additives promote the formation of hydration products in mixtures with low to medium MWP levels, thereby increasing strength and potentially improving microstructure density. As a result, these additives also have the potential to improve early-age strength.
- Using MWP at levels of 20–25% is a critical threshold value for environmental impact resistance in high-temperature environments such as fire and freeze–thaw cycles.
- In terms of cement consumption, the reduction in carbon emissions achieved by a 10–20% reduction could be an important factor in the creation of green building certification systems using such mixtures.
- In order to establish a framework for the evaluation of post-disaster demolition waste, for example, in the case of major disasters such as the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes, efforts are being made to continue the work of developing the necessary infrastructure for the use of materials obtained from post-disaster construction debris as secondary raw materials.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Andrew, R.M. Global CO2 Emissions from Cement Production. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2018, 10, 195–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scrivener, K.L.; John, V.M.; Gartner, E.M. Eco-Efficient Cements: Potential Economically Viable Solutions for a Low-CO2 Cement-Based Materials Industry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, P.K.; Monteiro, P.J.M. Concrete Microstructure, Properties, and Materials; McGraw-Hill: Columbus, OH, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Yehia, S.; Farrag, S.; Helal, K.; El-Kalie, S. Effects of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, and Ground-Granulated Blast Slag on Properties of Self-Compacting High Strength Lightweight Concrete. GSTF J. Eng. Technol. 2015, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moolchandani, K. Industrial Byproducts in Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Review. Next Mater. 2025, 8, 100593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, M.D.A. Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash in Concrete; Portland Cement Association: Skokie, IL, USA, 2007; Volume 5420. [Google Scholar]
- Imbabi, M.S.; Carrigan, C.; McKenna, S. Trends and Developments in Green Cement and Concrete Technology. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2012, 1, 194–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Li, X.; Fu, W.; Xu, T.; Liu, Y.; Qin, J.; Liang, K. Formation of Calcium-Aluminum-Silicate-Hydrate (C-A-S-H) in Iron Ore Tailings Ceramsite and Its Influence on Cement Hydration Degree. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2024, 153, 105711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Sun, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, K.; Wang, A. Study on the Mechanical Properties and Sulfate Resistance of Desert Sand-Supersulfated Cement Mortar with Different Curing Methods. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 103, 112162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallé, C. Effect of Drying on Cement-Based Materials Pore Structure as Identified by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 1467–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sua-iam, G.; Sokrai, P.; Makul, N. Novel Ternary Blends of Type 1 Portland Cement, Residual Rice Husk Ash, and Limestone Powder to Improve the Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EFNARC. The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete: Specification, Production and Use. The European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems; EFNARC, Association House: Farnham, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Etli, S.; Cemalgil, S.; Onat, O. Effect of Pumice Powder and Artificial Lightweight Fine Aggregate on Self-Compacting Mortar. Comput. Concr. 2021, 27, 241–252. [Google Scholar]
- Gesoglu, M.; Güneyisi, E.; Hansu, O.; Etli, S.; Alhassan, M. Mechanical and Fracture Characteristics of Self-Compacting Concretes Containing Different Percentage of Plastic Waste Powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 140, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.-A.; Chang, T.-P.; Shih, J.-Y.; Suryadi Djayaprabha, H. Enhancement of Low-Cement Self-Compacting Concrete with Dolomite Powder. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 161, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehdizadeh, B.; Jahandari, S.; Vessalas, K.; Miraki, H.; Rasekh, H.; Samali, B. Fresh, Mechanical, and Durability Properties of Self-Compacting Mortar Incorporating Alumina Nanoparticles and Rice Husk Ash. Materials 2021, 14, 6778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghaddam, H.H.; Lotfollahi-Yaghin, M.A.; Maleki, A. Comprehensive Analysis of Mechanical Characteristics in Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) with Aluminum Oxide (Al2O3) Nanoparticles and Glass Fibers: An Experimental and Analytical Investigation. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 22, e04095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etli, S. Effect of Recycled Brick Powder on the Properties of Self-Compacting Fiber Reinforced Mortars Produced with Different Cement Types. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 2024, 18, 743–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EN 197-1; Cement: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. European Committee for standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
- BS EN 12620; Aggregates for Concrete. British Standards Institution: London, UK, 2002.
- Ji, Y.; Ji, W.; Li, W. Performance of Building Solid Waste Powder in Cement Cementitious Material: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aquino Rocha, J.H.; Toledo Filho, R.D. The Utilization of Recycled Concrete Powder as Supplementary Cementitious Material in Cement-Based Materials: A Systematic Literature Review. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 76, 107319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhan, B.; Gao, P.; Hu, L.; Qiao, M.; Sha, H.; Yu, Q. Effects of Recycled Concrete Powders on the Rheology, Setting and Early Age Strength of Cement Paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 401, 132899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neville, A.M. Properties of Concrete; Longman: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, H.F.W. Cement Chemistry; Thomas Telford Publishing: London, UK, 1997; ISBN 0-7277-3945-X. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM C494; Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2001.
- Oltulu, M.; Şahin, R. Effect of Nano-SiO2, Nano-Al2O3 and Nano-Fe2O3 Powders on Compressive Strengths and Capillary Water Absorption of Cement Mortar Containing Fly Ash: A Comparative Study. Energy Build. 2013, 58, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oltulu, M.; Şahin, R. Single and Combined Effects of Nano-SiO2, Nano-Al2O3 and Nano-Fe2O3 Powders on Compressive Strength and Capillary Permeability of Cement Mortar Containing Silica Fume. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 7012–7019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jose, P.A.; Alex, A.G.; Gebrehiwet, T.; Murugan, S. Influence of Fe2O3 Nanoparticles on the Characteristics of Waste Marble Powder Mixed Cement Mortars. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2023, 17, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BS EN 196-1; Methods of testing cement—Part 1: Determination of strength. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
- ASTM C666; Standard Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2008.
- ASTM C642; Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2005; pp. 1–3.
- Ikotun, J.O.; Adedeji, P.O.; Babafemi, A.J. A Comprehensive Review on the Performance of Low-Carbon Ceramic Waste Powder as Cement Replacement Material in Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etli, S.; Yılmaz, T. Comprehensive Study on the Role of Mycrisparite in Enhancing Strength, Stability, and Microstructural Traits of Self-Compacting Mortars. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2025, 29, 1701–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, C.; Day, R.L. Pozzolanic reaction in the presence of chemical activators: Part I. Reaction kinetics. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, C.; Day, R.L. Pozzolanic reaction in the presence of chemical activators: Part II—Reaction products and mechanism. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kou, S.C.; Poon, C.S. Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete Prepared with Recycled Glass Aggregate. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2009, 31, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaliq, W.; Kodur, V. Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Fiber Reinforced High Performance Self-Consolidating Concrete at Elevated Temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1112–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alarcon-Ruiz, L.; Platret, G.; Massieu, E.; Ehrlacher, A. The Use of Thermal Analysis in Assessing the Effect of Temperature on a Cement Paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 609–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chidiac, S.E.; Panesar, D.K. Evolution of Mechanical Properties of Concrete Containing Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Effects on the Scaling Resistance Test at 28days. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2008, 30, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, T. A New Concrete Freeze–Thaw Damage Model Based on Hydraulic Pressure Mechanism and Its Application. Materials 2025, 18, 3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, W.; Liu, W.; Ashour, A.; Zhang, Z.; Li, W.; Jiang, H.; Sun, C.; Qiu, L.; Yao, S.; Lu, W.; et al. Sustainable Ultra-High Performance Concrete with Incorporating Mineral Admixtures: Workability, Mechanical Property and Durability under Freeze-Thaw Cycles. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 19, e02345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahaman, M.N. Ceramic Processing and Sintering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kingery, W.D.; Bowen, H.K.; Uhlmann, D.R. Introduction to Ceramics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, X.Y.; Cao, R.; Li, H.Q. Fabrication and Mechanical Properties of Ultra-Fine Grained γ-Ni–20Fe/Al2O3 Composites. Ceram. Int. 2006, 32, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silveira, P.H.P.M.; Eltom, A.E.; Le Sénéchal, N.V.; dos Santos, J.L.; Gomes, A.V.; da Silva, M.H.P. Evaluation of the Effect of Fe2O3 as a Sintering Additive on Densification, Microstructure, and Thermal Stability of Al2O3. Adv. Mater. Sustain. Manuf. 2025, 2, 10005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callister, W.D., Jr.; Rethwisch, D.G. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
Study | Material System | Type of Additive | Replacement/Dose | Key Observations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Etli et al. [13] | SCM | MWP | 0–35% by vol. | The use of MWP as a mineral additive in volume ratios of 0–35% was investigated. According to the findings, the use of MWP in ratios of 10% and below increases mechanical strength. However, when the additive ratio exceeded 20%, a significant increase in porosity was observed, which led to a decrease in durability. |
Gesoglu et al. [14] | SCC | Plastic/MWP blend | 10–30% | Plastic waste and MWP mixtures were used as admixtures in self-compacting concrete (SCC) at concentrations ranging from 10% to 30%. The results indicate an improvement in microstructure. However, it has been reported that some difficulties were encountered in mixture stability due to the effect of the admixtures on the flowability of fresh concrete. |
Nguyen et al. [15] | SCC | Dolomite powder | 5–15% | The use of dolomite powder in the SCC system at rates of 5–15%. The findings reveal that dolomite powder increases the fluidity of concrete. However, when the additive ratio exceeds 15%, a decrease in compressive strength is observed. |
Wang et al. [8] | Paste | Iron ore tailings + Al2O3 | Al2O3 @ 3% | Iron ore waste and 3% Al2O3 additive were used in cement paste. The findings show that the formation of C-A-S-H gels is promoted, and the early hydration process is accelerated. This has a positive effect, especially in terms of early age strength. |
Liu et al. [9] | Mortar | Supersulfated cement + Fe2O3 | Fe2O3 @ 3% | 3% Fe2O3 additive was used in mortar systems together with sulfate cement. The results show an increase in resistance, particularly against chloride and sulfate ions. However, no significant change was observed in mechanical strength; strength remained constant. |
Sua-iam et al. [11] | SCC | Limestone + rice husk ash + Al2O3 | 15–30% blend | A mixture of limestone, rice husk ash, and Al2O3 was used in SCC at ratios of 15–30%. The data obtained showed that this additive combination provided a 20–25% increase in strength. In addition, it was determined that there was an approximately 30% decrease in water absorption. |
Chemical Composition | (%) |
---|---|
CaO | 63.37 |
SiO2 | 19.34 |
Al2O3 | 3.75 |
Fe2O3 | 4.15 |
MgO | 3.1 |
SO3 | 3.15 |
K2O | 0.81 |
Na2O | 0.41 |
Loss of ignition | 1.92 |
Blaine (m2/kg) | 366 |
Specific gravity (g/cm3) | 3.15 |
MIX ID. | Cement | Reinforced Mortar Waste (0.063 mm) | HRWR | Water | Sand | % Substitution Rate by Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCM1 | 600 | 0 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 0 |
SCM2 | 570 | 30 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 5 |
SCM3 | 540 | 60 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 10 |
SCM4 | 510 | 90 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 15 |
SCM5 | 480 | 120 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 20 |
SCM6 | 450 | 150 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 25 |
SCM7 | 420 | 180 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 30 |
SCM8 | 390 | 210 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 35 |
SCM9 | 360 | 240 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 40 |
SCM10 | 330 | 270 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 45 |
SCM11 | 300 | 300 | 12 | 230 | 1524 | 50 |
Mix-ID | Flowing Diameter (mm) | V-Funnel (s) |
---|---|---|
SCM1 | 259 | 10.51 |
SCM2 | 257 | 10.16 |
SCM3 | 256 | 9.82 |
SCM4 | 254 | 9.47 |
SCM5 | 251 | 9.13 |
SCM6 | 250 | 8.79 |
SCM7 | 249 | 8.3 |
SCM8 | 246 | 8.16 |
SCM9 | 246 | 8 |
SCM10 | 242 | 7.3 |
SCM11 | 240 | 7.01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hansu, O.; Etli, S. Evaluation of the Usability of SCMs Produced by Adding Aluminum and Iron Oxide to Mortar Waste Powder Under Different Conditions. Buildings 2025, 15, 3067. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173067
Hansu O, Etli S. Evaluation of the Usability of SCMs Produced by Adding Aluminum and Iron Oxide to Mortar Waste Powder Under Different Conditions. Buildings. 2025; 15(17):3067. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173067
Chicago/Turabian StyleHansu, Osman, and Serkan Etli. 2025. "Evaluation of the Usability of SCMs Produced by Adding Aluminum and Iron Oxide to Mortar Waste Powder Under Different Conditions" Buildings 15, no. 17: 3067. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173067
APA StyleHansu, O., & Etli, S. (2025). Evaluation of the Usability of SCMs Produced by Adding Aluminum and Iron Oxide to Mortar Waste Powder Under Different Conditions. Buildings, 15(17), 3067. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173067