Digital News Blindspot: Radon Awareness in Portuguese Digital Media

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please find the attached file.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

N/A

Author Response

I would like to thank you for your detailed and meticulous review of my work, which I believe has significantly improved the text. That's why I'm sending you the text in this section with the changes I've made based on your notes. Thank you again

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Introduction part about the risks should be more coherent. Although the tendencie was to explain the nature of risks and how people "digest" risks I reccomend this action in order to improve the overall quality of the text and connection of Introduction to the part that follows. In the process of deleting some parts some additional literature should be added about risks communiction examples regarding health and enviromental issues that could be connected to this study. I suggest adding one more hypotheses about Agenda setting theory and why Portugal's media ignored presented issue-due to lack of interes or due to some kind of media agenda. 

Also, I suggest deleting lines 325-329.

Author Response

I would like to thank you for your detailed and meticulous review of my work, which I believe has significantly improved the text. That's why I'm sending you the text in this section with the changes I've made based on your notes. Thank you again

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The author(s) have really improved this manuscript. The author(s)’ revision was thorough and have indeed developed the manuscript to an appreciative level. The manuscript reflects the knowledge in the field, an attempt at showcasing the rigour put into the study. The literature is fresher and reflects current knowledge in the area, and the introduction is clearer. The methods section has also imporved.

As a result of the efforts put into the revision, I recommend that the editors accept this paper.

I would like to thank to the author(s) for working on this study and thank the editors for given me the chance to review this manuscript.

Good luck!  

Comments on the Quality of English Language

N/A