Application of TaqMan Real-Time PCR for Detecting ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus’ Infection in Sugar Beet
Department of Integrative Infection Biology Crops-Livestock, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(11), 1466; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111466
Submission received: 4 October 2021
/
Revised: 5 November 2021
/
Accepted: 9 November 2021
/
Published: 12 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
Abstract
:The γ-proteobacterium ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus’ is assigned as the major pathogen of “Syndrome des basses richesses”, a sugar beet disease characterised by a reduction in the sugar content of taproots and biomass yield. Despite the economic impact of this bacteriosis, diagnostics for this important pathogen currently rely on end-point PCR detection. Herein, we introduce a TaqMan qPCR for diagnostics of the agent targeting genes encoding a heat shock protein of the Hsp20 family and mannose-6-phosphate isomerase. Quantitation with synthetic oligonucleotides as standard showed that the developed TaqMan qPCR assays enable the detection of up to 100 target copies. A comparison between the TaqMan qPCR and end-point PCR for ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ detection was carried out on 78 sugar beet samples from different locations in southern Germany. The newly developed assays enable the fast, reliable and sensitive detection of ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ in sugar beet.
1. Introduction
Germany is one of the world’s largest sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) producers, but in 2008, a new and devastating disease, named “Syndrome des basses richesses” (SBR), was recognised in the country [1]. SBR has been well-known in neighbouring French Burgundy since the 1990s and results in taproots characterised by a lowered sugar content of up to 5% and reduced biomass, resulting in high economic losses [2]. It is now widespread in south-western parts of Germany, where it threatens profitability for sugar beet growers and associated industry sectors. Two vector-transmitted and phloem-limited bacteria are associated with this disease, namely the γ-proteobacterium ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus phytopathogenicus’ [3,4,5] and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ from the Mollicutes class [2,6]. ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ has been identified as the main agent for SBR [7,8], and is transmitted by the planthopper Pentastiridius leporinus (Cixiidae) [4,6]. Phytoplasma infection of sugar beet by ‘Ca. P. solani’ has also been reported for Germany [9], but the epidemiology remains unclear.
Additionally, infected sugar beet plants show yellowing and necrotic old leaves, while small, narrow and chlorotic leaves are produced by new shoots. The taproot is characterised by a brown-coloured phloem [3]. Besides the visual inspection of sugar beets, several molecular assays have been developed for detecting ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’, including the application of the primer pair Fra4/Fra5, targeting the 16S rRNA gene [9], originally designed for the closely-related ‘Candidatus Phlomobacter fragariae’ that causes the marginal chlorosis of strawberries [10]. The usage of the primer pair led to the discovery of ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ [3]. Fra5 can also be applied in combination with the universal bacterial primers fD1/rP1 in PCR, in order to generate longer amplification products [4,7]. Furthermore, the primers Alb1/Oliv1 have been designed to amplify ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ 16S-ITS region, resulting in five DNA fragments with a characteristic pattern of four bands [11]. Additional primer sets for end-point PCR have been designed to characterise the spoT-spoU-recG gene locus [12]. Unfortunately, no qPCR assay has been published to date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two TaqMan qPCR assays for detecting ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ for beet samples in different German SBR regions.
2. Results
Two TaqMan assays were developed to target the mannose-6-phosphat isomerase and heat shock protein 20 genes for detecting and quantifying ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’. The evaluation of 78 taproot samples provided evidence on the reliability of not only the newly developed TaqMan qPCR assays (this study), but also the application of an established Fra4/Fra5 endpoint-PCR assay [3].
2.1. Primers and Probes for qPCR
Primers targeting manA and the hsp20 gene of ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ produced amplification products of 116 bp and 90 bp, respectively, while the designed nad5 sugar beet plant template control assay for Beta vulgaris generated a 96 bp amplification product (Table 1). Partial gene sequences show the highest sequence similarities to the Arsenophonus endosymbionts of Aphis craccivora (CP038155.1, CP038156.1) with 98% for manA and 95% for hsp20 identity.
2.2. Detection Limit for the ‘Ca. A. Phytopathogenicus’-Specific TaqMan Assay
The application of diluted gBlocks resulted in standard curves with an R2 value of 0.994 and 0.987 for hsp20 and manA, respectively. The slopes of the linear fit showed values of −3.495 and −4.055, thereby resulting in an efficiency of 93.26% for hsp20- and 76.45% for manA-TaqMan assay (Figure 1).
For the hsp20 TaqMan assay, mean quantification cycle (Cq) values, previously known as the threshold cycle (Ct), ranged between 22.2 for the lowest dilution (1.0 × 106) and 38.7 for the dilution of 10 copies (1.0 × 101), but only one reaction of the three replicated with 10 copies was identified as positive. Reactions with one copy (1.0 × 100) showed no amplification. The variation in Cq increased at 100 copies to a standard deviation (Cq SD) of 0.37 for hsp20. A concentration between 1.0 × 106 and 1.0 × 103 copies/reaction led to consistent amplification (standard deviation ≤ 0.12 cycles), while serial dilution steps from 1.0 × 106 to 1.0 × 101 copies differed by a mean Cq value of 3.3.
The manA-TaqMan assay resulted in mean Cq values (triplicate) ranging from 19.2 (1.0 × 106) to 35.5 (1.0 × 102). Copy numbers 10 and 1 were not identified. The mean Cq values of serial dilutions differed by an average of 4.07. As for the hsp20 assay, at 100 copies there was no consistent amplification (Cq SD of 0.41). A concentration between 1.0 × 106 and 1.0 × 103 copies/reaction led to consistent amplification (standard deviation ≤ 0.19 cycles). For both assays, samples with Cq values < 40 can be considered positive.
In summary, both assays reliably detected 102 target copies. The hsp20 assay showed better efficiency in the evaluation, but within the standard curve measuring, the manA-assay showed higher Cq values in comparison to the hsp20 assay.
2.3. TaqMan qPCR versus End-Point PCR
Both TaqMan qPCR assays were consistent in identifying ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ in 59 out of 78 taproot samples (19 negative samples). The Cq values of the positive samples were compared to the those obtained from the standard manA and hsp20 TaqMan assay curves. Most of the positive samples (44 out of 59 for hsp20 and 45 out of 59 for manA) had mean Cq values < 30 (Supplementary Material Table S1), indicating copies of min. 1.0 × 103 or higher (Table 2). Despite differences in the efficiency of the two assays for detecting the agent, screened sugar beet samples showed comparable Cq values for both assays.
The plant control, targeting nad5 of B. vulgaris, showed strong amplification, with Cq values ranging from 16.0 to 21.3 for the examined samples. Unfortunately, this assay was not suitable for combination with manA or hsp20 assay primers for multiplexing. Depending on primer concentrations, we either produced non-detectable results for SBR or it resulted in high Cq values close to the maximum number of cycles for both the internal control (nad5) and the SBR targets genes (hsp20 and manA) (data not shown). Therefore, application of the nadA assay is suggested, in order to confirm the presence of a usable template in the assays.
Identification of ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ taproot samples by the TaqMan assays was confirmed by end-point PCR using the primer pair Fra4/Fra5 [10], resulting in the expected 550 bp PCR products (Supplementary Material Figure S1).
2.4. Sampling Sites and Verification of the Amplification Products
Twelve sampling sites in five federal states were selected in Germany (Table 3). Ten sampling sites contained positive taproot samples. For two of the 12 sampling sites, all taproot samples were negative (Bondorf and Wendershausen).
Sequences of 13 samples from ten positive sampling sites were amplified in end-point PCR (Fra4/Fra5) and sequenced thereafter. A multiple sequence alignment of samples sequenced with Fra4/Fra5 showed 100% identical sequences over 486 bp, which matched the expected part of the 16S ribosomal gene in the sequence analysis.
Seven positive samples from six sampling sites were amplified and sequenced with TaqMan assay primers (hsp20 and manA); additionally, 12 samples from all sampling sites were chosen for verifying amplified sequences with the internal primer nad5. Multiple sequence alignment analysis of the fragments showed 100% identity between all sequences (from different sampling sites) for each primer pair. Sequence analyses confirmed the desired amplification targets in all cases.
3. Discussion
For more than a decade, SBR has spread across southern Germany. It completely covers some sugar beet plots, while others are visually asymptomatic and—as exemplified herein—remain uninfected in October 2020 (Bondorf and Wendershausen). The fast, sensitive and reliable detection of ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ is one of the major requirements for gaining a better understanding of the epidemiology. Pressure on sugar beet cultivation in Germany is not limited to ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’, however. Several viruses caused by Beet yellows virus (BYV), beet mild yellowing virus (BMYV), beet chlorosis virus (BChV) and beet mosaic virus (BtMV) cause virus yellows (VY) disease in sugar beet, resulting in high economic losses [13]. Other bacterioses of sugar beet have been recently analysed, including the Rubbery Taproot Disease caused by ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ in the Pannonian Plain or a related strain from Germany [9]. The latter was discovered during a routine screening of sugar beet whilst applying a widely used phytoplasma 16S-rDNA TaqMan assay with a detection limit originally described at 106 [14]. In a recent study, this assay was re-evaluated in comparison to a specific assay for detecting ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi’ in elm species [15]. Results not only strongly supported the reliability of the 16S-rDNA TaqMan assay, but it also shows that the assay reaches a detection limit of ten copies and a Cq value of 37.2. This result was obtained in parallel to a specific assay for detecting ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi’, reaching a minimum of ten template copies with a Cq value of 35.1 and using a plasmid DNA standard supplemented by elm DNA. In these studies, the calculation of the standard curve was also based on a 10-fold dilution of the quantified target. An approach for a more precise estimation for the limit of detection would be to narrow down the target concentration of standards while increasing the number of replicates, as suggested by Forootan et al., 2017 [16]. One may speculate about other factors influencing the detection limit, but in this regard, consideration should be given to the impact of the applied template, probe labelling, enzyme mixes, microtiter plates, the real-time cycler, etc. In any case, the impact of the phytoplasma 16S-rDNA TaqMan assay in phytoplasma diagnostics will not be touched [14]. Here, the assays failed to reach a detection limit of ten copies in the triplicate. It cannot be estimated if this is related to the usage of gBlocks as standards. These synthetic controls are popular due to their defined sequences, the option for quick ordering and the possibility of easy exchange between research teams [17]. Previously, this approach has been used for the quarantine pest pathogen Xylella fastidiosa, enabling a detection of ten copies and achieving a Cq value of 35 [18]. However, in contrast, the authors applied pure X. fastidiosa DNA and a gBlock standard not supplemented with plant DNA. The impact of supplementation by plant templates on qPCR efficiency remains unclear, but similar Cq values of 36.5 (hsp20) and 35.5 (manA) have been achieved in comparison.
As shown above, many studies, including this one, reach detection limits at high Cq values. In accordance with other studies [18], samples are considered to contain the pathogen if they show a Cq value of <40 and an amplification curve with exponential growth.
The TaqMan qPCR assays presented here enable the reliable and early detection of infection as well as quantification. This prerequisite offers the fast screening of sugar beet genotypes exhibiting weak infection or tolerance despite high colonisation; however, it also enables the identification of so-far unknown vectors and reservoir plants that need to be considered in phytosanitary management. These possibilities should not be underestimated with respect to already announced SBR-tolerant sugar beet varieties.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Material
A total of 78 sugar beet plants were obtained from ten fields in the federal states of Baden-Wuerttemberg (BW), Rhineland-Palatinate (RP), Bavaria (BY), Saxony (SN) and Hesse (HE) in Germany (Table 3).
4.2. DNA Templates
Taproot tissue (2 g) was homogenised in plastic extraction bags (Bioreba, Grenzach, Switzerland), and nucleic acid extraction was performed using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide extraction procedure [19,20]. The purified pellet was dissolved in 75 μL of double-distilled water and stored at −20 °C.
The absolute concentration of the DNA samples was measured using a Qubit® fluorometer with a dsDNA assay BR Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All samples were diluted prior to amplification to an average DNA amount of 3.4 ng/µL and transferred in 96-well plates.
4.3. Gene Target Selection and Primer Design for the TaqMan qPCR Assay
Primers and associated TaqMan probes were designed in Primer 3 release 4.1.0 (https://primer3.ut.ee accessed on 10 February 2020) [21], using default parameters but setting the product size range from 90–130 bp. The ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ target gene sequences, mannose 6-phosphate isomerase (manA) and heat shock protein 20 (hsp20), were obtained via a metagenomic shotgun applying DNA from an infected sugar beet sample, since no genome sequence of the pathogen is available in public databases. The target sequences belong to a small subset of the metagenomic data assigned to the pathogen and fulfil the criteria for the selection of suitable oligonucleotide sets. Gene sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers OK335756 and OK335757. Target sequences identical to other entries in GenBank have been searched by BLASTN [22]. The internal oligos (TaqMan probes) were dual-labelled with 6′-carboxyfluorescein (5’ end) and a Black Hole Quencher-1 (3′-end) (6′FAM/BHQ-1). Primers and probes for plant control were designed on a Beta vulgaris NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5 encoding gene (nad5) sequence from GenBank (NC_002511.2, BevupMp052), and the probe was labelled with hexachlorofluorescein at the 5′ end and a Black Hole Quencher-1 at the 3′-end (HEX/BHQ-1). All oligonucleotides (Table 1) were obtained from Metabion (Planegg/Steinkirchen, Germany).
4.4. TaqMan Assay Conditions
Each TaqMan qPCR reaction comprised 2.08 µL double distilled water, 10 µL of Fast Probe qPCR Master Mix (Roboklon, Berlin, Germany), 0.45 µM of each primer and 0.2 µM probe, 0.2 µL Uracil-N-Glycosylase (UNG) and 7.5 µL of diluted DNA template (approximately 26 ng).
The cycling parameters comprised uracil-N-glycosylase digested at 37 °C for 2 min, an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of a two-step protocol of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s. Real-time PCR was conducted on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). Samples including four negative template controls were measured as triplets. Data evaluation was done via StepOne Software v2.3 (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany).
4.5. Quantification and Evaluation of TaqMan qPCRs, Using gBlocks
The detection limit was evaluated by constructing a standard curve, using synthetic oligonucleotides (gBlocks). The double-stranded gBlock fragments (Integrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium) are 125 bp long (Table 4).
The lyophilised gBlock fragments were dissolved in 0.1 × TE-Buffer. The stock solution provided over 1.8 × 1012 copies and was diluted to receive 1.0 × 106 copies/µL, followed by a serial dilution 1:10 to 1.0 × 100 for each gBlock. Seven dilution levels (1.0 × 106 copies to 1 copy in 2 µL) and a non-template control (NTC, double distilled water), each with three replicates, were measured. The results were also verified by repeatedly measuring with DNA (29.3 ng) from a non-infected taproot added to dilution steps 1.0 × 106, 1.0 × 104, 1.0 × 102, 1.0 × 101/PCR reaction to obtain similar conditions to those for unknown samples.
The standard curves were created by plotting the Ct-values of dilution series against the relative concentration on a semi-logarithmic scale via StepOne Software v2.3 (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). The R square and slope values were calculated based on standard curves, while the reaction efficiency of the assay was evaluated with the formula EX = 10(−1/slope). The baseline was always set automatically, and the threshold for the hsp20 TaqMan assay was set manually at 0.381948. The standard curve was used to assess sensitivity and to estimate roughly the bacteria titer in the samples.
4.6. End-Point PCR and Gel Electrophoresis
The results of the TaqMan qPCRs were compared to those of the same samples measured in end-point PCR, targeting part of the 16S rDNA sequence [10]. Sugar beet samples are considered to be SBR-positive in qPCR if the Cq value is <40, while positive detection in end-point PCR is relying on visualisation of amplification products by agarose gel electrophoresis. PCRs were performed in a reaction volume of 25 µL, including 12.5 µL OptiTaq Master Mix (Roboklon, Berlin, Germany), 0.08 µL of each primer Fra4/Fra5 (100 µM), 4.84 µL double-distilled water and 7.5 µL DNA. Cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 90 s, 35 cycles of 92 °C, 52 °C and 72 °C each of 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 1 min. The obtained PCR products (550 bp) were separated in agarose gel (1%), stained with GelRed (Genaxxon bioscience, Ulm, Germany) and visualised with a UV transilluminator.
4.7. Verification of Amplification Products
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens10111466/s1, Figure S1: Gel images of end-point PCR using Fra4/Fra5 primers, Table S1: Cq values of TaqMan qPCR for the gene targets heat shock protein 20 (hsp20), mannose 6-phosphat isomerase (manA) and NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5 (nad5).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, C.Z. and M.K.; methodology, C.Z. and M.K.; software, C.Z.; validation, M.K. and C.Z.; formal analysis, C.Z. and M.K.; investigation, M.K.; resources, C.Z and M.K.; data curation, C.Z. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Z.; writing—review and editing, C.Z. and M.K.; visualization, C.Z.; supervision, M.K.; project administration, M.K.; funding acquisition, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the Südzucker AG, Germany (ID 200245).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Gene sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers OK335756 and OK335757.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Johann Maier and Veit Nübel from Südzucker AG, Germany, for providing samples and financial support. We would also like to thank Larissa Kamp from the Sugarbeet Growers’ Association of Baden-Wuerttemberg (Verband bad.-württ. Zuckerrübenanbauer e.V.) for her kind support. We thank Daniela Rivatelli for excellent technical assistance.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Pfitzer, R.; Schrameyer, K.; Voegele, R.T.; Maier, J.; Lang, C.; Varrelmann, M. Ursachen und Auswirkungen des Auftretens von “Syndrome des basses richesses” in deutschen Zuckerrübenanbaugebieten. Sugar Ind. 2020, 145, 234–244. [Google Scholar]
- Bressan, A.; Sémétey, O.; Nusillard, B.; Clair, D.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Insect vectors (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) and pathogens associated with the disease syndrome “basses richesses” of sugar beet in France. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gatineau, F.; Jacob, N.; Vautrin, S.; Larrue, J.; Lherminier, J.; Richard-Molard, M.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Association with the syndrome “basses richesses” of sugar beet of a phytoplasma and a bacterium-like organism transmitted by a Pentastiridius sp. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sémétey, O.; Gatineau, F.; Bressan, A.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Characterization of a γ-3 proteobacteria responsible for the syndrome “basses richesses” of sugar beet transmitted by Pentastiridius sp. (Hemiptera, Cixiidae). Phytopathology 2007, 97, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bressan, A.; Terlizzi, F.; Credi, R. Independent Origins of Vectored Plant Pathogenic Bacteria from Arthropod-Associated Arsenophonus Endosymbionts. Microb. Ecol. 2012, 63, 628–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gatineau, F.; Larrue, J.; Clair, D.; Lorton, F.; Richard-Molard, M.; Boudon-Padieu, E. A new natural planthopper vector of stolbur phytoplasma in the genus Pentastiridius (Hemiptera: Cixiidae). Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2001, 107, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sémétey, O.; Bressan, A.; Richard-Molard, M.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Monitoring of proteobacteria and phytoplasma in sugar beets naturally or experimentally affected by the disease syndrome “Basses richesses”. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2007, 117, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bressan, A.; Sémétey, O.; Nusillard, B.; Boudon-Padieu, E. The syndrome “basses richesses” of sugar beet in France is associated with different pathogen types and insect vectors. Bull. Insectology 2007, 60, 395–396. [Google Scholar]
- Ćurčić, Ž.; Kosovac, A.; Stepanović, J.; Rekanović, E.; Kube, M.; Duduk, B. Multilocus Genotyping of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ Associated with Rubbery Taproot Disease of Sugar Beet in the Pannonian Plain. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zreik, L.; Bové, J.M.; Garnier, M. Phylogenetic characterization of the bacterium-like organism associated with marginal chlorosis of strawberry and proposition of a Candidatus taxon for the organism, ‘Candidatus Phlomobacter fragariae’. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1998, 48, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sémétey, O.; Bressan, A.; Gatineau, F.; Boudon-Padieu, E. Development of a specific assay using RISA for detection of the bacterial agent of “basses richesses” syndrome of sugar beet and confirmation of a Pentastiridius sp. (Fulgoromopha, Cixiidae) as the economic vector. Plant Pathol. 2007, 56, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salar, P.; Sémétey, O.; Danet, J.-L.; Boudon-Padieu, E.; Foissac, X. ‘Candidatus Phlomobacter fragariae’ and the proteobacterium associated with the low sugar content syndrome of sugar beet are related to bacteria of the arsenophonus clade detected in hemipteran insects. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2010, 126, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, R.; Menzel, W.; Lachmann, C.; Varrelmann, M. New insights into virus yellows distribution in Europe and effects of beet yellows virus, beet mild yellowing virus, and beet chlorosis virus on sugar beet yield following field inoculation. Plant Pathol. 2021, 70, 584–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christensen, N.M.; Nicolaisen, M.; Hansen, M.; Schulz, A. Distribution of phytoplasmas in infected plants as revealed by real-time PCR and bioimaging. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 1175–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schneider, B.; Kätzel, R.; Kube, M. Widespread occurrence of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi’ in elm species in Germany. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Forootan, A.; Sjöback, R.; Björkman, J.; Sjögreen, B.; Linz, L.; Kubista, M. Methods to determine limit of detection and limit of quantification in quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Biomol. Detect. Quantif. 2017, 12, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conte, J.; Potoczniak, M.J.; Tobe, S.S. Using synthetic oligonucleotides as standards in probe-based qPCR. Biotechniques 2018, 64, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bonants, P.; Griekspoor, Y.; Houwers, I.; Krijger, M.; van der Zouwen, P.; van der Lee, T.A.J.; van der Wolf, J. Development and evaluation of a triplex taqman assay and next-generation sequence analysis for improved detection of Xylella in plant material. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
- Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of Plant DNA from Fresh Tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
- Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Amplification plot (A) and standard curve (B) for the hsp20 and manA-TaqMan qPCR assays. A dilution series (106 to 100) of gBlocks was measured in triplicate. (A) Amplification plots for the gBlock dilutions and NTCs. (B) Standard curve obtained by plotting the threshold numbers of PCR cycles (triplicates) against the dilution (log scale).
Figure 1.
Amplification plot (A) and standard curve (B) for the hsp20 and manA-TaqMan qPCR assays. A dilution series (106 to 100) of gBlocks was measured in triplicate. (A) Amplification plots for the gBlock dilutions and NTCs. (B) Standard curve obtained by plotting the threshold numbers of PCR cycles (triplicates) against the dilution (log scale).
Table 1.
TaqMan primers and probes designed for detecting ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ and B. vulgaris as plant controls for the gene targets heat shock protein 20 (hsp20), mannose 6-phosphat isomerase (manA) and NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5 (nad5).
Table 1.
TaqMan primers and probes designed for detecting ‘Ca. A. phytopathogenicus’ and B. vulgaris as plant controls for the gene targets heat shock protein 20 (hsp20), mannose 6-phosphat isomerase (manA) and NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5 (nad5).
| Species | Amplicon Size | Oligonucleotide | Length | Sequence (5′–3′) | Labelling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca. P. phytopathogenicus | 90 | SBR_hsp20_F | 21 | CACTTTTGCCGCTGATAGTCA | |
| SBR_hsp20_R | 20 | TGGAACTCACAGTAGCGGTT | |||
| SBR_hsp20_P | 23 | AACTCCTGTTGTTTATAACCAGG | 6-FAM/BHQ-1 | ||
| Ca. P. phytopathogenicus | 116 | SBR_manA_F | 20 | CAACCAGGTGAAGCGATGTT | |
| SBR_manA_R | 20 | TTGTTAGTTAATCCCGCGCG | |||
| SBR_manA_P | 20 | TCTCTATGCCAGAACTCCGC | 6-FAM/BHQ-1 | ||
| B. vulgaris | 96 | BV_nad5_F | 20 | TGAATGACGAGTCGGACCAA | |
| BV_nad5_R | 20 | TCGGAGAGCACTGAATTCGA | |||
| BV_nad5_P | 20 | TACCCTTGCGTGCAATGATG | HEX/BHQ-1 |
Table 2.
Mean Cq values (±SD) for the gBlock standards after qPCR. Detection limit in triplicate is 100 copies/reaction (outlined in red).
Table 2.
Mean Cq values (±SD) for the gBlock standards after qPCR. Detection limit in triplicate is 100 copies/reaction (outlined in red).
| Copy Number | Cq Values of the hsp20-Target a | Cq Values of the manA-Target a |
|---|---|---|
| 1 × 106 | 22.2 (±0.07) | 19.2 (±0.12) |
| 1 × 105 | 25.7 (±0.05) | 22.2 (±0.10) |
| 1 × 104 | 29.7 (±0.12) | 25.9 (±0.15) |
| 1 × 103 | 33.1 (±0.04) | 30.1 (±0.19) |
| 1 × 102 | 36.5 (±0.37) | 35.5 (±0.41) |
| 1 × 101 | not detected (38.7 b) | not detected |
| 1 × 100 | not detected | not detected |
a Mean of three technical replicates; b Cq value of one technical replicate, the other two technical replicates are not detected.
Table 3.
Sampling sites with coordinates in DD format (decimal degrees) and qPCR results.
| Sampling Site | Variety | No of Samples | manA-qPCR * | hsp20-qPCR * | Coordinates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gundelsheim (BW) | Eucalyptus | 7 | 29 (28–32) | 29 (26–31) | 49.264944, 9.160611 |
| Bondorf (BW) | Alcedo | 3 | not detected | not detected | 48.528556, 8.821111 |
| Wendershausen (HE) | LUNELLA KWS | 16 | not detected | not detected | 51.323417, 9.882556 |
| Massenbach (BW) | BTS 440 | 7 | 32 (29–38) | 30 (28–33) | 49.177556, 9.063472 |
| Gemmingen (BW) | Racoon | 5 | 31 (27–34) | 30 (26–32) | 49.159167, 9.003556 |
| Fürfeld (BW) | Raison | 7 | 28 (27–30) | 28 (27–29) | 49.212389, 9.052028 |
| Bickenbach (HE) | BTS 8750 N | 5 | 30 (29–32) | 30 (28–30) | 49.760708, 8.602995 |
| Ochsenfurt, Gollhofen (BY) | LUNELLA KWS | 6 | 28 (27–29) | 28 (27–29) | 49.577722, 10.184778 |
| Heddesheim (BW) | BTS7300 | 6 | 27 (26–29) | 28 (25–29) | 49.509024, 8.583888 |
| Ochsenfurt, Rodheim (BY) | BTS 440 | 6 | 30 (28–33) | 30 (28–33) | 49.587222, 10.150194 |
| Deutschhof (Südpfalz) (RP) | N/A | 6 | 28 (25–30) | 28 (26–29) | 49.086707, 8.020107 |
| Welsau (SN) | ADVENA KWS | 4 | 30 (28–32) | 29 (28–32) | 51.577121, 12.950829 |
* Mean Cq values (each sample measured in triplicate) and range of all Cq values (min–max).
Table 4.
Sequences of double-stranded gBlock fragments for hsp20 and manA target.
| Target | Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
| hsp20 | 5′-GTTTCACTTTTGCCGCTGATAGTCAGCTTATTATTCAATACTGATATATCTAACTCCTGTTGTTTATAACCAGGAACCGCTACTGTGAGTTCCAGATTTTCTTTATCTTTTTGGTATAAATTGTA-3′ |
| manA | 5′-GAATTACAACCAGGTGAAGCGATGTTTCTCTATGCCAGAACTCCGCATGCTTATATTGAAGGTGTTGGTTTAGAAGTAATGGCCAATTCTGACAATGTACTGCGCGCGGGATTAACTAACAAACA-3′. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Zübert, C.; Kube, M. Application of TaqMan Real-Time PCR for Detecting ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus’ Infection in Sugar Beet. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111466
AMA Style
Zübert C, Kube M. Application of TaqMan Real-Time PCR for Detecting ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus’ Infection in Sugar Beet. Pathogens. 2021; 10(11):1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111466
Chicago/Turabian StyleZübert, Christina, and Michael Kube. 2021. "Application of TaqMan Real-Time PCR for Detecting ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus’ Infection in Sugar Beet" Pathogens 10, no. 11: 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111466
APA StyleZübert, C., & Kube, M. (2021). Application of TaqMan Real-Time PCR for Detecting ‘Candidatus Arsenophonus Phytopathogenicus’ Infection in Sugar Beet. Pathogens, 10(11), 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111466
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
