Next Article in Journal
COVID-19, Livestock Systems and Food Security in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
Canine Circovirus in Foxes from Northern Italy: Where Did It All Begin?
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Methods Used for Diagnosing Tuberculosis in Captive and Free-Ranging Non-Bovid Species (2012–2020)
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Molecular Investigation of Porcine Circovirus Type 3 Infection in Pigs in Namibia

Pathogens 2021, 10(5), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10050585
by Umberto Molini 1,2, Giuseppe Marruchella 3,*, Frieda Matheus 1, Yvonne Maria Hemberger 1, Bernard Chiwome 1, Siegfried Khaiseb 2, Giovanni Cattoli 4 and Giovanni Franzo 5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pathogens 2021, 10(5), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10050585
Submission received: 26 April 2021 / Revised: 6 May 2021 / Accepted: 8 May 2021 / Published: 11 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Circoviruses)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I would like to thank the authors for addressing the concerns raised during the first round of revision. 

I would kindly ask them to include the information about the primers, the conditions and the PCR system used for beta actin detection in the manuscript for clarification. 

 

Author Response

As specified in the manuscript, the samples used from this study were collected from commercial slaughtered pigs and secondary samples delivered to the Central Veterinary Laboratory of Windhoek for diagnostic purposes in the presence of clinical signs. Therefore, no ethical approval was required according to Namibian national legislation.

Reviewer 1

Comment: I would kindly ask them to include the information about the primers, the conditions and the PCR system used for beta actin detection in the manuscript for clarification. "

Answer: We apologize for not mentioning it. More information has now been added to the manuscript.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The responses to reviewers submitted by the authors are well done and complete. In addition, the modifications and clarifications made in the manuscript promote a better understanding of the methodology used in this study. The manuscript can be considered for publication.

Author Response

Many thanks to the Reviewer for his/her kind suggestions.

Back to TopTop