Next Article in Journal
The Emergence of the Genus Comamonas as Important Opportunistic Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of a Near Full-Length Hepatitis E Virus Genome of Subtype 3c Generated from Naturally Infected South African Backyard Pigs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/pathogens11091031
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection and Multigene Typing of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’-Related Strains Infecting Tomato and Potato Plants in Different Regions of Turkey

by
Behçet Kemal Çağlar
1,* and
Eray Şimşek
2
1
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Çukurova University, Adana 01330, Turkey
2
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, Şanlıurfa 63290, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2022, 11(9), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091031
Submission received: 5 August 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 11 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ (‘Ca. P. solani’) is a crop pathogen that is a member of the 16SrXII-A ribosomal subgroup. It is also known as stolbur phytoplasma and causes yield losses in several important crops, especially in Solanaceous crops. Different strains of the pathogen are regularly reported all over the world, particularly in the Mediterranean region. In this study, the determination of genetic diversity for the pathogen infecting tomatoes and potatoes was carried out by using multilocus sequence typing analysis for the Tuf, SecY, and Vmp1 genes to gain insight into the epidemiology of ‘Ca. P. solani’ in Turkey. Genetic diversity of the phytoplasmas was investigated by sequence-based phylogenetic analyses and in silico RFLP analysis of related genes. It was determined that all ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains infecting tomatoes and potatoes were tuf-b, which is linked to field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.). Tomato or potato-infecting ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains showed similarities with each other; however, the isolates collected from different plants showed genetic differences in terms of the SecY gene. This study indicates that the highest genetic variability of collected samples was found in the Vmp1 gene. RsaI-RFLP analysis of TYPH10F/R amplicons showed that potato-infecting ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains were found to be similar to some existing V types. However, the V-type of tomato-infecting isolates is not similar to any previously reported V-type. The results indicate that there could be an important genetic diversity of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related phytoplasmas in Turkey. This could indicate various ways in which the pathogen has adapted to the two host plants as a consequence of the various Vmp1 gene rearrangements seen in these two plant hosts. Obtained results also indicate that the epidemiology of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related phytoplasmas in the tomato and potato agroecosystem may be better understood with the use of molecular data on the complex of vmp-types.

1. Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) are two significant crops of the Solanaceae family, with an annual production of 13.095.258 and 5.100.674 tons, respectively, in Turkey [1]. As with many other wild and cultivated plants, tomato and potato plants are seriously affected by phytoplasma agents, which are phytopathogenic Mollicutes invading phloem tissues (the sieve elements) of the host plant. The diseases caused by phytoplasmas have been causing significant economic losses. The most common phytoplasma agent detected in tomato and potato production areas in Turkey is ‘Ca. phytoplasma solani’ [2,3,4,5]. ‘Ca. phytoplasma solani’ was also detected and characterized in different plant species, e.g., sesame [2,3,4,5], grapes [6], maize [7], pomegranate [8], and cucumber [9] in Turkey. ‘Ca. P. solani’ causes “bois noir” in vineyards and leaf redness diseases in maize plants [10]. Bois noir is one of the serious phytoplasma diseases that affect grapevines and is linked to stolbur phytoplasma [11]. ‘Ca. P. solani’ also results in stolbur (yellow type disease) in potato, tomato, pepper, tobacco, carrot, celery, garden bean, parsley, etc. [11]. Stolbur disease is characterized by a significant yield loss. The polyphagous insect vector Hyalesthes obsoletus (Cixiidae), which can complete its life cycle on just a few plant species, typically transmit the pathogenic agent ‘Ca. P. solani’ from plant to plant [12,13]. Because of its intricate ecological and epidemiological complex life cycle, it can adapt to different agroecosystems. Therefore, spreading the disease agent via insects or other crop plants into various geographical regions is inevitable [14,15]. A symptomless period in crop plants for a certain amount of time may also mask the disease is being detected unless delicate molecular methods have been employed. Therefore, rapid and simple phytoplasma detection/typing methods have been in great demand [16]. The use of the 16SrDNA sequence often does not provide enough information to carry out most of the epidemiological investigations based on strain discrimination [17]. Multigene genotyping techniques have been developed to distinguish different phytoplasma strains. ‘Ca. Phytoplasma solani’ has many different strains that have been molecularly characterized based on the Tuf, SecY, Vmp1, and Stamp sequencing. Many researchers have developed molecular typing methods, including several genes [11,18,19]. Molecular detailed characterization or typing of ‘Ca. P. solani’ has so far identified 33, 59, and 80 genetic variants based on the sequences of SecY, Stamp, and Vmp1, respectively [14,20]. Additionally, the Tuf gene sequence studies indicated the existence of three ‘Ca. P. solani’ Tuf-types (a, b1, and b2) are linked to various ecological systems [14,21,22,23]. The housekeeping gene Tuf encoding the elongation factor Tu was examined to ascertain the molecular epidemiology of ‘Ca. P. solani’ [24]. RFLP characterization of Tuf revealed two main types: Tuf a, which infects stinging nettle (Urtica dioica), and Tuf-b (later called Tuf-b1), which is linked to field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) [25]. In a limited area of Germany, a third minor genotype known as Tuf-c was also discovered in hedge bindweed (Calystegia sepium) as an alternate host plant [24]. By the sequence analysis, novel tuf-type variants were associated with stinging nettle, designated as Tuf-b2 [26,27] and Tuf-ab [28,29] in vineyards in Austria, Macedonia, Croatia, and Montenegro.
SecY is an integral membrane protein that forms a heterotrimeric channel-like structure with SecE and SecG in the SecY secretion pathway of preproteins via the bacterial cell membrane, which is mediated by ATPase [30,31]. Because of its capacity to interact with numerous targeting factors, chaperones, and accessory proteins, the SecYEG translocon is globally conserved and plays a vital role in bacterial protein transport regulating protein translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane [32] because protein translocation is a ubiquitous and necessary mechanism that permits secretory proteins to leave cells and membrane proteins to integrate into lipid bilayers [33].
Vmp1 and Stamp are the other housekeeping genes encoding membrane proteins. Phylogenetic analyses of Vmp1 and Stamp-based molecular markers allow us to better understand how phytoplasma population structures and dynamics are formed [34,35]. The Vmp1 gene encodes a 557-amino-acid protein with a suspected signal peptide and a possible C-terminal transmembrane domain [36]. The mature 57.8 kDa Vmp1 protein is presumably embedded in the phytoplasma membrane, with a significant hydrophilic portion exposed to the cell surface [36].
Understanding the genetic diversity of phytoplasma is a powerful tool for analyzing their epidemiology and putting proper disease monitoring and management in place. The primary focus of this study was to investigate the genetic diversity of ‘Ca. P. solani’ infecting tomato and potato plants to highlight the potential of genetic variants in the country and what they are. The presence of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’-related strains have been previously reported in Turkey. However, no studies have been conducted yet in terms of studies on genes that provide epidemiological information. Based on the nested-PCR assay, we first identified the causal agents of the symptomatic tomato and potato sampled from the Kahramanmaraş and Adana regions. Afterward, some informative genes were used for detailed characterization of the pathogen to evaluate the epidemiologically informative Tuf, Vmp1, and SecY genes of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains in naturally infected tomato and potato to elucidate genetic relationships that could have importance in disease transmission in the region. Our data also prove that different ‘Ca. P. solani’ lineages infect tomato and potato plants in close regions.

2. Results

2.1. Phytoplasma Detection and Symptom Observation

Potato plants with leaf yellowing or reddish discoloration with rolling leaf symptoms and tomato plants with floral abnormalities with sepal hypertrophy symptoms were observed and sampled from the surveyed fields (Figure 1). The presence of plants with these symptoms at the edge of the field raised suspicion of vector-borne disease infection. Guided sampling was performed to collect diseased plants, so all samples were taken from symptomatic plants. P1/Tint and F2n/R2 primer pairs were used to amplify DNA bands (about 1.2 kb) from 16 symptomatic leaf tissues and the positive control (data not shown). However, no bands were observed from the asymptomatic plants and negative control.
The representative sequences were chosen and submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers ON856337, ON856338, and ON856338, respectively. The 16SrDNA partial sequences of positive samples showed 100% identity with each other and 99.70% with that of ‘Ca. P. solani’ (GenBank accession number AF248959). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16SrDNA was also performed to classify the subgroup of phytoplasmas. According to the phylogenetic analysis results, all 16 positive samples were found to be infected with 16SrXII-A group phytoplasmas (Figure 2). While constructing the phylogenetic tree, one representative isolate was selected from each type based on other genes.

2.2. Sequence Typing by RFLP Analyses and Phytogenetic Relationships

The first identification based on the 16S rDNA was accomplished using iPhyClassifier based on in silico RFLP patterns (similarity coefficient 1.00), which showed that the discovered phytoplasma belonged to the 16SrXII-A subgroup. Distinctive enzyme digestion patterns such as AluI, MseI, TaqI, and 14 others are shown in Figure 3. Based on the 16SrDNA gene, all isolates were found to exhibit the same RFLP profile. Since additional genes were recommended as criteria for thorough differentiation of ‘Ca. Phytoplasma’ species [37], classification was performed using sequence typing for three epidemiologically informative genes, Tuf, Vmp1, and SecY.
HpaII and RsaI restriction enzymes performed RFLP studies on the Tuf and Vmp1 gene amplicons, respectively. All 16 positive plant samples yielded successful amplification of the Tuf gene with Tuf1f/r, and TufAYf/r primers gave the expected ~0.96 kbp PCR product (Figure 4a). The HpaII restriction profiles showed the presence of the bindweed-associated Tuf-b type as defined by [38] in all infected tomato and potato samples (Figure 4b). The Tuf gene partial sequences of positive samples showed 100% identity with each other and 99.89% with that of ‘Ca. P. solani’ (GenBank accession number JQ797670.1) and representative sequences were selected and submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers ON864440, ON864441, and ON864442, respectively.
SecY gene sequences were determined for 16 samples from Adana and Kahramanmaraş. All samples gave the expected ~0.9 kbp bp PCR amplicons with PosecF1/R1 and PosecF3/R3 primer pairs (data not shown). Regardless of the region from which it is isolated, all ‘Ca. P. solani’ isolates infecting tomatoes were found identical to each other in terms of partial SecY gene fragments. Potato-infecting ‘Ca. P. solani’ isolates were found to be identical too; however, when the SecY gene fragments infecting tomato and potato plants were compared, it was detected that 99.88% similarity according to the blast analysis. Representative sequences were selected and submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers ON885880, ON885881, and ON885882, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains infecting tomato and potato based on the SecY gene showed clustering of all strains in a close cluster to SecY-4-type phytoplasmas (Figure 5).
All 16 ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains yielded Vmp1 gene amplicons of around ~1.4 kbp length. All TYPH10F/R nested-PCR products showed identical lengths (Figure 6). However, the RsaI digestion profiles of tomato and potato samples were found to be different, as seen in Figure 7. Regardless of the region from which it is isolated, all ‘Ca. P. solani’ isolates infecting tomatoes were found identical to each other in terms of partial Vmp1 gene fragments. Potato-infecting ‘Ca. P. solani’ isolates were found to be identical too; however, when the Vmp1 gene fragments infecting tomato and potato plants were compared, it was detected that 93.54% similarity according to the blast analysis. Representative sequences were selected and submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers ON885883, ON885884, and ON885885, respectively.
A phylogenetic tree was built using Vmp1 gene sequences from the NCBI GenBank database to represent the various RFLP patterns. These sequences were differentiated from each other according to RsaI-RFLP digestion profiles. RsaI enzymatic digestion profiles with Vmp1 gene amplicons enabled the identification of two distinct RFLP types (Figure 7), according to different V types reported in the previous studies [21,29,39].
Different profiles have been obtained for Vmp1, similar to the SecY gene-based typing. While the RsaI digestion profiles of the ‘Ca. P. solani’ Vmp1 gene fragments isolated from potatoes were found close to the V1 type, the digestion profile of RsaI isolated from tomatoes was uniquely determined. The Vmp1 gene sequence variations varied in tomato and potato isolates.
In this study, the phytoplasmas infecting the tomato and potato were also distinguished by their distinct Vmp1 profiles thanks to restriction digestion using RsaI enzymes (Figure 7).

3. Discussion

The first report of stolbur disease was recorded in 1988 in Turkey [40]. Epidemic occurrences of tomato or potato stolbur disease were previously reported in different regions of Turkey [2,3,41,42]. As seen by previous studies, the association between ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains and other phytoplasma species have already been noted in Turkey. However, very few studies report detailed characterization, such as MLST or multigene characterization of phytoplasma diseases in Turkey. By employing DNA sequences of the 16S rRNA, Tuf, SecY, and Vmp1 genes of ‘Ca. P. solani’, this study emphasized that there could be different genetic variations infecting tomatoes and potatoes in Turkey. This study used a multiple gene sequence analysis to discriminate between closely similar ‘Ca. P. solani’ variations infecting crops belonging to the same family. The two provinces are about 200 km apart, and the altitude difference is 545 m. The genetic differences between the samples did not differ according to the region, and the most important difference was detected with the SecY and Vmp1 genes. It has been determined that this genetic difference between the pathogen originates from the cultivated plant from which it is isolated. The 16SrDNA and Tuf partial gene sequences of positive samples from tomato and potato showed 100% identity with each other and >99% with reference strains. The conserved 16SrDNA gene has been the main basis for the classification of phytoplasmas into ribosomal groups based on 16S and subgroups, as well as the naming of “Candidatus Phytoplasma” species. However, due to the high level of rRNA nucleotide sequence conservation across numerous phytoplasma lineages, identifications based only on the 16SrDNA gene have some limitations. Therefore, different genes other than 16SrDNA are generally used for further typing of phytoplasmas. The Tuf gene is more informative than 16SrDNA for the epidemiological search of the ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains. The epidemiological informative and housekeeping gene-based data of ‘Ca. P. solani’ are combined in their genetic structure. Based on the nucleotide polymorphisms of the gene constitutive elongation factor Tu encoding (Tuf), ‘Ca. P. solani’ often belongs to one of two molecular types (tuf a, b) [38]. Tuf-b, one of the epidemiological types of ‘Ca. P. solani’ is mainly reported as Convolvulus arvensis-related (field bindweed). According to our findings, all ‘Ca. P. solani’-related isolates were found as Tuf-b type. The abundance of the Tuf-b-type-infecting tomato and potato plants indicates that the Convolvulus arvensis-related alternative host system is the primary component of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strain ecology in the Adana and Kahramanmaraş provinces in Turkey agro-ecosystem. Tuf-b type and other strains of ‘Ca. P. solani’ was also reported in Iran and Azerbaijan, border neighbors with Turkey. If we look at vectorial transmission, Hyalesthes obsoletus Signoret (Homoptera: Cixiidae), a polyphagous insect vector that lives predominantly on bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.), and other hosts of ‘Ca. P. solani’ inside and/or outside agrosystems is responsible for the transmission of ‘Ca. P. solani’ to crop plants [38,43]. No vector or weed sampling was performed in our study; however, the presence of the Hyalestes obsoletus and Convolculus arvensis have been previously reported in Turkey [44,45]. According to data from this study, phytoplasmal diseases that may be transmitted by Hyalestes obsoletus may cause significant yield losses in these crops in the future.
Recently, a study characterizing SecY and Vmp1 partial genes of the ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains was carried out in the Eastern Region of Turkey [46]. They found that the phytoplasma associated with tomato showed a highly phylogenetic affinity with the same sequences of the same agent from Serbia and France, respectively, based on Vmp1 and SecY gene sequences. The Vmp1 gene sequence was included in the phylogenetic analysis in this study (Figure 8). While all of the phytoplasma isolates infecting the tomato in our study formed a single clade, it was determined that they differed from the Vmp1 type detected in the previous study. We think this situation is probably due to the geographical region difference between Turkey. In our study, as seen in Figure 5, we identified two different SecY genotypes that were found to be genetically close to the SecY-4 type in central regions of Turkey that are closely related to those found in other countries infecting different insects or hosts.
According to the Vmp1 gene typing, by using RsaI digestion of TYPH10F/R products, we distinguished two new different profiles not reported in previous studies that have become prevalent in Turkish tomato and potato fields (Figure 7). ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains isolated from potatoes were found to be similar to the V1 type. However, the strains isolated from tomatoes were not similar to any previously reported V variants of ‘Ca. P. solani’. Like all Mollicutes, phytoplasmas do not have a cell wall, and the role of membrane proteins in phytoplasma-host interactions has been emphasized by previous studies [36,47]. Furthermore, the newly discovered Vmp1 genotypes could raise the potential for another insect(s) or different host(s) to be involved in the disease dissemination of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains in Turkey. The Vmp1 gene provides information about the phytoplasma vector-pathogen-weed host relationships and the molecular epidemiology of the pathogen [36]. This gene is highly variable and interacts with hosts or vectors in complex ways. According to previous studies, it could be instructive and helpful for understanding the molecular epidemiology of ‘Ca. P. solani’ [21,25].
Further investigations that characterize ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains infecting weed hosts (or other solanaceous plants) and planthoppers found in Turkish tomato and potato fields must confirm and better understand ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains epidemiology.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Sources of Nucleic Acids and Field Sampling

In August 2020 and 2021, 10 tomato and six potato fields occupying 10 ha intensive production areas in the central Anatolia region were surveyed to examine possible ‘Ca. P. solani’-associated symptoms. Leaf samples were collected from 30 tomato and 18 potato plants exhibiting typical phytoplasma symptoms in Kahramanmaraş and Adana provinces. At least one sample of an asymptomatic plant as a negative control was taken from each field. The samples were wrapped in paper, labeled, and put into plastic bags, then delivered to the laboratory in cold chain conditions on the same day. The samples were then cleaned of papers, sliced, and stored at −20 °C until use.

4.2. Isolation of Nucleic Acids and PCR Detection of Phytoplasmas

Total nucleic acid extractions were performed using fresh leaves (from midrib) of the samples to isolate and identify possible phytoplasmas. With a few minor adjustments, the extraction procedure was carried out utilizing the CTAB-based approach [48]. In short, midrib tissues (~1 g) were homogenized inside CTAB-buffer (2% w/v cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, 1.4 mol/L NaCl, 20 mmol/L EDTA, 100 mmol/L Tris HCl, 0.2% 2-β-mercaptoethanol and 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone-40, at pH 8.0) then it was left incubating at 65 °C for 25 min. The lysate was extracted by using a 24:1 (v/v) mixture of chloroform/isoamyl alcohol, then precipitated with isopropanol at 20 °C overnight. Centrifugation at 15,000× g was used to separate the precipitated nucleic acids, after which the pellet was cleaned with 70% ethanol, allowed to dry at room temperature, and then dissolved in 50 μL of sterile double-distilled water (SDDW). Before polymerase chain reaction (PCR) experiments, nucleic acids were measured and diluted with SDDW to a final concentration of 20 ng/μL. Stem parts of a cactus plant known to be infected with phytoplasma were used as a positive control in the DNA isolation.
Initial phytoplasma identification was made by nested-PCR analysis with phytoplasma universal primer pairs P1 [49]/Tint [50] amplifying a fragment of ~1.6 kbp from the 16SrRNA gene and a part of the 16S–23S spacer region followed by R16F2n/R2 primer pairs [51] amplifying ~1.2 kbp products from the 16S rRNA. Pure DNA from maize plants known to be infected with the ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strain was used as a positive control in PCR-related analyses.

4.3. Molecular Characterization of the Strains Based on Tuf, VMP1, and SecY Genes

Characterizations of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains associated with tomato and potato were carried out based on the Vmp1 gene, which encodes a putative membrane protein, the Tuf gene, which encodes the translation elongation factor Tu, and the SecY gene, which encodes the translocase protein. All the phytoplasma-positive total nucleic acids amplified by the R16F2n/R2 primers were used as the template for amplification of Vmp1, Tuf, and SecY genes using StolH10F1/R1, fTuf1/rTuf1 and PosecF1/R1 primer pairs followed by nested-PCR with TYPH10F/R, fTufAY/rTufAY, and PosecF3/R3 primer pairs, respectively [36,52,53].

4.4. Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analyses

ExoSAP-IT® for PCR product clean-up (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, USA) was used to purify the obtained amplicons in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified products were quantified utilizing a nanodrop spectrophotometer. Direct sequencing of all positive amplicons with high-quality bands in the agarose gel from several genes (16SrDNA, Tuf, SecY, and Vmp1) was performed by Letgen, Turkey, on both strands with the related primer pairs used for the amplification. Chromatograms were edited using the Chromas version 2.33 software (http://technelysium.com.au/wp/chromas/, accessed on 26 June 2022) and assembled using the MEGA 7 software [54] to obtain a consensus sequence, and it was used to cut off ~30–40 bp of the terminal end sequence. To find the nucleotide identities for the ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains, the NCBI GeneBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 26 June 2022) was searched using all of the consensus sequences for each gene as the query sequences (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 26 June 2022).
The nucleotide identities for the ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains are available in GeneBank NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 26 June 2022), and all of the consensus sequences for each gene were used as the query sequences in the BLAST searches (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 26 June 2022). Multiple alignments were carried out using ClustalW, and nucleotide sequences were collected in FASTA format [55].
Phylogenetic trees based on distance analysis were produced by Mega 7 [54]. As indicated next to the tree branches, the proportion of replicate trees in which the related strains grouped in the bootstrap test (1000 repetitions) was calculated. The scaled phylogenetic trees had branch lengths that corresponded to the evolutionary distances that were utilized to build the trees. As an outgroup for the 16S rRNA tree root, the sequence from Acholeplasma laidlawii (GenBank accession number M23932) was employed. In order to rebuild the evolutionary connections according to the 16SrDNA, Tuf, Vmp1, and SecY genes, various nucleotide sequences were retrieved from the GenBank database and used together with the nucleotide sequences generated in this work.
Different nucleotide sequences were downloaded from the GenBank database and used together with the nucleotide sequences generated in this study to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships according to 16SrDNA, Tuf, Vmp1, and SecY genes.

4.5. In Silico RFLP Analyses

Since all amplicons with positive results were sequenced, a wet restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) study was not preferred; instead, in silico RFLP analysis was performed with these sequences via iPhyClassifier [56] based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences with 17 different restriction endonuclease enzymes to determine the structural diversity [57]. The pDRAW32 software v. 1.1.146 (AcaClone software, http://www.acaclone.com (accessed on 26 June 2022)) was employed for virtual digestion of the tuf and vmp1 sequences with the HpaII and RsaI endonucleases, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11091031/s1, Table S1: Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ genome project and genetic diversity in the Euro-Mediterranean basin.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.K.Ç. and E.Ş.; methodology, B.K.Ç.; software, E.Ş.; validation, B.K.Ç. and E.Ş.; formal analysis, B.K.Ç.; investigation, B.K.Ç.; resources, B.K.Ç.; data curation, E.Ş. and B.K.Ç.; writing—original draft preparation, E.Ş. and B.K.Ç.; writing—review and editing, B.K.Ç. and E.Ş.; visualization, E.Ş.; supervision, B.K.Ç.; project administration, B.K.Ç.; funding acquisition, B.K.Ç. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data reported in this study can be found at NCBI.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Murat Dikilitaş for an expert English edit of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. TUIK Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK). Crop Production Statistics. 2021. Available online: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/ (accessed on 7 September 2022).
  2. Sertkaya, G.; Martini, M.; Musetti, R.; Osler, R. Detection and molecular characterization of phytoplasmas infecting sesame and solanaceous crops in Turkey. Bull. Insectology 2007, 60, 141. [Google Scholar]
  3. Özdemir, N.; Saygili, H.; Sahin, F.; Karsavuran, Y.; Bayrak, O.F.; Oral, B. Host range and genetic characterization of a phytoplasma causing tomato stolbur disease in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 2009, 808, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eroglu, S.; Ozbek, H.; Sahin, F. First Report of Group 16SrXII Phytoplasma causing stolbur disease in potato plants in the eastern and southern anatolia regions of Turkey. Plant. Dis. 2010, 94, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Çağlar, B.K.; Elbeaino, T.; Pehlivan, D.; Fidan, H.; Baloğlu, S. Genetically comparing of stolbur phytoplasma on potato plants from kayseri and sivas provinces in Turkey. In Proceedings of the 15th Triennial Meeting of the Virology Section of the European Association of Potato Research (EAPR), Antalya, Turkey, 23–31 May 2013; p. 34. [Google Scholar]
  6. Şimşek, E.; Güldür, M. Detection and molecular characterization of phytoplasmas based on 16s rdna gene region by phylogenetic and in silico rflp analysis of local grapevine cultivars in Şanlıurfa and Adıyaman. Harran Tarım Ve Gıda Bilim. Derg. 2021, 25, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Çağlar, B.K.; Şimşek, E.; Dikilitas, M.; Bertaccini, A. Characterization of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ associated with a maize leaf reddening disease in Turkey. J. Phytopathol. 2021, 169, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gazel, M.; Çağlayan, K.; Başpınar, H.; Mejia, J.F.; Paltrinieri, S.; Bertaccini, A.; Contaldo, N. Detection and identification of phytoplasmas in pomegranate trees with yellows symptoms. J. Phytopathol. 2016, 164, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Usta, M.; Güller, A.; Sipahioğlu, H.M. Detection and characterization of two phytoplasma lineages on cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) with same symptomatology based on virtual rflp and nucleotide sequence analysis of 16S RDNA. Yuz. Yil Univ. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 27, 299–308. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jović, J.; Cvrković, T.; Mitrović, M.; Krnjajić, S.; Redinbaugh, M.G.; Pratt, R.C.; Gingery, R.E.; Hogenhout, S.A.; Toševski, I. Roles of stolbur phytoplasma and Reptalus panzeri (Cixiinae, Auchenorrhyncha) in the epidemiology of maize redness in Serbia. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2007, 118, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Quaglino, F.; Zhao, Y.; Casati, P.; Bulgari, D.; Bianco, P.A.; Wei, W.; Davis, R.E. “Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani”, a novel taxon associated with stolbur- and bois noir-related diseases of plants. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 2879–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sforza, R.; Clair, D.; Daire, X.; Larrue, J.; Boudon-Padieu, E. The role of Hyalesthes obsoletus (Hemiptera: Cixiidae) in the occurrence of bois noir of grapevines in France. J. Phytopathol. 1998, 146, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maixner, M. Transmission of German grapevine yellows (Vergilbungskrankheit) by the planthopper Hyalesthes obsoletus (Auchenorrhyncha: Cixiidae). Vitis 1994, 33, 103–104. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pierro, R.; Passera, A.; Panattoni, A.; Rizzo, D.; Stefani, L.; Bartolini, L.; Casati, P.; Luvisi, A.; Quaglino, F.; Materazzi, A. Prevalence of a ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ Strain, so far associated only with other hosts, in bois noir-affected grapevines within tuscan vineyards. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2018, 173, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mitrović, M.; Jakovljević, M.; Jović, J.; Krstić, O.; Kosovac, A.; Trivellone, V.; Jermini, M.; Toševski, I.; Cvrković, T. ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ genotypes associated with potato stolbur in serbia and the role of Hyalesthes obsoletus and Reptalus panzeri (hemiptera, cixiidae) as natural vectors. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2016, 144, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nair, S.; Manimekalai, R. Phytoplasma diseases of plants: Molecular diagnostics and way forward. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ray, M.R.; Sinha, D. Phytoplasma. In Methods in Molecular Biology; Dickinson, M., Hodgetts, J., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2013; Volume 938. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fabre, A.; Danet, J.L.; Foissac, X. The stolbur phytoplasma antigenic membrane protein gene stamp is submitted to diversifying positive selection. Gene 2011, 472, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Passera, A.; Zhao, Y.; Murolo, S.; Pierro, R.; Arsov, E.; Mori, N.; Moussa, A.; Silletti, M.R.; Casati, P.; Panattoni, A.; et al. Multilocus genotyping reveals new molecular markers for differentiating distinct genetic lineages among “Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani” strains associated with grapevine bois noir. Pathogens 2020, 9, 970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pierro, R.; Panattoni, A.; Passera, A.; Materazzi, A.; Luvisi, A.; Loni, A.; Ginanni, M.; Lucchi, A.; Bianco, P.A.; Quaglino, F. Proposal of a new bois noir epidemiological pattern related to ‘Candidatus phytoplasma solani’ strains characterized by a possible moderate virulence in Tuscany. Pathogens 2020, 9, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cvrković, T.; Jović, J.; Mitrović, M.; Krstić, O.; Toševski, I. Experimental and molecular evidence of Reptalus Panzeri as a natural vector of bois noir. Plant. Pathol. 2014, 63, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Quaglino, F.; Sanna, F.; Moussa, A.; Faccincani, M.; Passera, A.; Casati, P.; Bianco, P.A.; Mori, N. identification and ecology of alternative insect vectors of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ to grapevine. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pierro, R.; De Pascali, M.; Panattoni, A.; Passera, A.; Materazzi, A.; De Bellis, L.; Luvisi, A.; Bianco, P.A.; Quaglino, F. In silico three-dimensional (3d) modeling of the secy protein of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ strains associated with grapevine “bois noir” and its possible relationship with strain virulence. Int. J. Plant Biol. 2022, 13, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aryan, A.; Brader, G.; Mörtel, J.; Pastar, M.; Riedle-Bauer, M. An abundant “Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani” Tuf b strain is associated with grapevine, stinging nettle and Hyalesthes obsoletus. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2014, 140, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Johannesen, J.; Foissac, X.; Kehrli, P.; Maixner, M. Impact of vector dispersal and host-plant fidelity on the dissemination of an emerging plant pathogen. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jamshidi, E.; Murolo, S.; Ravari, S.B.; Salehi, M.; Romanazzi, G. Molecular typing of ‘ Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ in Iranian vineyards. Plant. Dis. 2019, 103, 2412–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Plavec, J.; Križanac, I.; Budinšćak, Ž.; Škorić, D.; Musić, M.Š. A case study of fd and bn phytoplasma variability in croatia: Multigene sequence analysis approach. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2015, 142, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kosovac, A.; Radonjić, S.; Hrnčić, S.; Krstić, O.; Toševski, I.; Jović, J. Molecular tracing of the transmission routes of bois noir in Mediterranean vineyards of Montenegro and experimental evidence for the epidemiological role of Vitex agnus-castus (Lamiaceae) and associated Hyalesthes obsoletus (Cixiidae). Plant. Pathol. 2016, 65, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Atanasova, B.; Jakovljević, M.; Spasov, D.; Jović, J.; Mitrović, M.; Toševski, I.; Cvrković, T. The molecular epidemiology of bois noir grapevine yellows caused by ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ in the Republic of Macedonia. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2015, 142, 759–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mori, H.; Ito, K. The sec protein-translocation pathway. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, I.M.; Zhao, Y.; Bottner, K.D. SecY gene sequence analysis for finer differentiation of diverse strains in the aster yellows phytoplasma group. Mol. Cell. Probes 2006, 20, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, C.; Wu, X.; Sun, D.; Park, E.; Catipovic, M.A.; Rapoport, T.A.; Gao, N.; Li, L. Structure of the substrate-engaged SecA-SecY protein translocation machine. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tsirigotaki, A.; De Geyter, J.; Šoštarić, N.; Economou, A.; Karamanou, S. Protein export through the bacterial sec pathway. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Quaglino, F.; Maghradze, D.; Casati, P.; Chkhaidze, N.; Lobjanidze, M.; Ravasio, A.; Passera, A.; Venturini, G.; Failla, O.; Bianco, P.A. Identification and characterization of new ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ strains associated with bois noir disease in Vitis Vinifera, L. Cultivars Showing a Range of Symptom Severity in Georgia, the Caucasus Region. Plant. Dis. 2016, 100, 904–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Murolo, S.; Romanazzi, G. In-vineyard population structure of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ using multilocus sequence typing analysis. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 31, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cimerman, A.; Pacifico, D.; Salar, P.; Marzachi, C.; Foissac, X. Striking diversity of vmp1, a variable gene encoding a putative membrane protein of the stolbur phytoplasma. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 2951–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Davis, R.E.; Zhao, Y.; Dally, E.L.; Lee, I.M.; Jomantiene, R.; Douglas, S.M. “Candidatus Phytoplasma Pruni”, a novel taxon associated with x-disease of stone fruits, Prunus spp.: Multilocus characterization based on 16S RRNA, SecY, and ribosomal protein genes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 766–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Langer, M.; Maixner, M. Molecular characterisation of grapevine yellows associated phytoplasmas of the stolbur-group based on rflp-analysis of non-ribosomal DNA. Vitis 2004, 43, 191–199. [Google Scholar]
  39. Foissac, X.; Carle, P.; Fabre, A.; Salar, P.; Danet, J.-L.; Stolbur Euromed Consortium. ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Solani’ Genome Project and Genetic Diversity in the Euro-Mediterranean Basin Invited Cconference. In Proceedings of the Third European Bois Noir Workshop, Barcelona, Spain, 20–21 March 2013. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nogay, A.; Ternar, Ş.; Ünal, E. Marmara bölgesi’nde domateslerde görülen stolbur hastaliği üzerinde araştirmalar. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 1988, 28, 79–98. [Google Scholar]
  41. Güller, A.; Usta, M. Stolbur and clover proliferation phytoplasma infections in tomato from Bingöl Province, Turkey. Türk Tarım Ve Doğa Bilim. Derg. 2020, 7, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Çağlar, B.K.; Elbeaino, T.; Küsek, M.; Pehlivan, D.; Fidan, H.; Portakaldalı, M. Stolbur phytoplasma infections in potato and tomato plants from different locations in Turkey. J. Turk. Phytopathol. 2010, 39, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sharon, R.; Soroker, V.; Wesley, S.D.; Zahavi, T.; Harari, A.; Weintraub, P.G. Vitex agnus-castus is a preferred host plant for Hyalesthes obsoletus. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 31, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bayram, S.; Zeybekoglu, U.; Soylemezoglu, G.; Canik, D.; Karavin, M.; Cakir, A.; Ertunc, F. Presence of putative insect vectors of grapevine yellows phytoplasmas in Turkey. Phytopathog. Mollicutes 2014, 4, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pala, F. Observation of weed species, frequency and density in common barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) fields of diyarbakir, Turkey: A case study. Tarım Bilim. Derg. 2020, 26, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Usta, M.; Güller, A.; Demirel, S. Molecular identification of ‘candidatus phytoplasma solani’ using secy and vmp1 genes in tomato plants from van province. Yuz. Yil Univ. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 31, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Arricau-Bouvery, N.; Duret, S.; Dubrana, M.P.; Batailler, B.; Desqué, D.; Béven, L.; Danet, J.L.; Monticone, M.; Bosco, D.; Malembic-Maher, S.; et al. Variable membrane protein a of flavescence dorée phytoplasma binds the midgut perimicrovillar membrane of Euscelidius variegatus and promotes adhesion to its epithelial cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02487-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ahrens, U.; Seemüller, E. Detection of DNA of plant pathogenic mycoplasmalike organisms by a polymerase chain reaction that amplifies a sequence of the 16S RRNA gene. Phytopathology 1992, 82, 828–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Deng, S.; Hiruki, C. Amplification of 16S RRNA genes from culturable and nonculturable mollicutes. J. Microbiol. Methods 1991, 14, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Smart, C.D.; Schneider, B.; Blomquist, C.L.; Guerra, L.J.; Harrison, N.A.; Ahrens, U.; Lorenz, K.H.; Seemüller, E.; Kirkpatrick, B.C. Phytoplasma-specific PCR primers based on sequences of the 16S-23S RRNA spacer region. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 2988–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gundersen, D.; Lee, I. Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-pcr assays using two universal primer pairs. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 1996, 35, 144–151. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fialová, R.; Válová, P.; Balakishiyeva, G.; Danet, J.L.; Šafárová, D.; Foissac, X.; Navrátil, M. Genetic variability of “stolbur” phytoplasma in annual crop and wild plant species in South Moravia. J. Plant. Pathol. 2009, 91, 411–416. [Google Scholar]
  53. Schneider, B.; Gibb, K.S.; Seemüller, E. Sequence and RFLP Analysis of the elongation factor tu gene used in differentiation and classification of phytoplasmas. Microbiology 1997, 143, 3381–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhao, Y.; Wei, W.; Lee, I.-M.; Shao, J.; Suo, X.; Davis, R.E. construction of an interactive online phytoplasma classification tool, iphyclassifier, and its application in analysis of the peach x-disease phytoplasma group (16SrIII). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 2582–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lee, I.M.; Gundersen-Rindal, D.E.; Davis, R.E.; Bartoszyk, I.M. Revised classification scheme of phytoplasmas based on rflp analyses of 16S RRNA and ribosomal protein gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1998, 48, 1153–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Pathogens 11 01031 g001 550
Figure 1. Disease symptoms related to the presence of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains in tomato and potato. (a) symptoms of potato stolbur phytoplasma of aerial tubers, (b) stolbur-infected potato plants in the field have yellowing and upward rolling top leaves, (c,d); Stolbur phytoplasma-infected tomato plants exhibited signs of sepal hypertrophy.
Figure 1. Disease symptoms related to the presence of ‘Ca. P. solani’-related strains in tomato and potato. (a) symptoms of potato stolbur phytoplasma of aerial tubers, (b) stolbur-infected potato plants in the field have yellowing and upward rolling top leaves, (c,d); Stolbur phytoplasma-infected tomato plants exhibited signs of sepal hypertrophy.
Pathogens 11 01031 g001
Pathogens 11 01031 g002 550
Figure 2. The Phylogenetic tree was constructed using ~1.2 kbp 16SrDNA gene fragments from the study’s phytoplasmas (bold) and the other phytoplasma species obtained from GenBank. The ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains detected in Turkey’s border neighbors are also included in the tree. MEGA7-created a neighbor-joining analysis was performed. At the nodes of the phylogenetic tree, bootstrap values greater than 70% were provided after 1000 bootstrap repeats. A distance of 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide site is represented by the scale bar. GenBank accession numbers and ribosomal subgroups are reported on the right of the strain names. A. laidlawii was employed as the outgroup to root the tree.
Figure 2. The Phylogenetic tree was constructed using ~1.2 kbp 16SrDNA gene fragments from the study’s phytoplasmas (bold) and the other phytoplasma species obtained from GenBank. The ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains detected in Turkey’s border neighbors are also included in the tree. MEGA7-created a neighbor-joining analysis was performed. At the nodes of the phylogenetic tree, bootstrap values greater than 70% were provided after 1000 bootstrap repeats. A distance of 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide site is represented by the scale bar. GenBank accession numbers and ribosomal subgroups are reported on the right of the strain names. A. laidlawii was employed as the outgroup to root the tree.
Pathogens 11 01031 g002
Pathogens 11 01031 g003 550
Figure 3. In silico RFLP patterns discriminating ‘Ca. P. solani’-related genotypes obtained from tomatoes and potatoes using iPhyclassifier. (A–C) are AluI, MseI, and TaqI digestions, respectively, indicating that the isolates are in subgroup 16SrXII-A. (D): the digestion profile of all samples with RFLP enzymes commonly used in phytoplasma 16Sr grouping. M: ϕX174 DNA-HaeIII Digest ladder (size range: 72, 118, 194, 234, 271, 281, 310, 603, 872, 1078, 1353 bp).
Figure 3. In silico RFLP patterns discriminating ‘Ca. P. solani’-related genotypes obtained from tomatoes and potatoes using iPhyclassifier. (A–C) are AluI, MseI, and TaqI digestions, respectively, indicating that the isolates are in subgroup 16SrXII-A. (D): the digestion profile of all samples with RFLP enzymes commonly used in phytoplasma 16Sr grouping. M: ϕX174 DNA-HaeIII Digest ladder (size range: 72, 118, 194, 234, 271, 281, 310, 603, 872, 1078, 1353 bp).
Pathogens 11 01031 g003
Pathogens 11 01031 g004 550
Figure 4. Wet and in silico gel images related to Tuf amplicons. (a) 1% agarose gel image of TufAYf/r amplicons. (b) RFLP analysis of the fTufAY/rTufAY amplicons of the elongation factor Tu (Tuf) gene with HpaII. Only ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ Tuf-type b was detected. M1: 1 kb DNA ladder and M2: ϕX174 DNA-HaeIII Digest ladder.
Figure 4. Wet and in silico gel images related to Tuf amplicons. (a) 1% agarose gel image of TufAYf/r amplicons. (b) RFLP analysis of the fTufAY/rTufAY amplicons of the elongation factor Tu (Tuf) gene with HpaII. Only ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ Tuf-type b was detected. M1: 1 kb DNA ladder and M2: ϕX174 DNA-HaeIII Digest ladder.
Pathogens 11 01031 g004
Pathogens 11 01031 g005 550
Figure 5. Unrooted phylogenetic tree constructed using ~0.9 kbp SecY gene fragments from ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains representing SecY sequence variants. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. The neighbor-joining approach was used to do the minimum evolution analysis, and the bootstrap was reproduced 1000 times. The names of the strains and their GenBank accession numbers are shown in the figure, and the nucleotide sequences acquired in this study are highlighted with red diamonds. SecY types are shown in parentheses.
Figure 5. Unrooted phylogenetic tree constructed using ~0.9 kbp SecY gene fragments from ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains representing SecY sequence variants. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. The neighbor-joining approach was used to do the minimum evolution analysis, and the bootstrap was reproduced 1000 times. The names of the strains and their GenBank accession numbers are shown in the figure, and the nucleotide sequences acquired in this study are highlighted with red diamonds. SecY types are shown in parentheses.
Pathogens 11 01031 g005
Pathogens 11 01031 g006 550
Figure 6. TYPH10F/R PCR products based on Vmp1 gene on 1% agarose gel., a–p: tomato and potato samples from Turkey. r and s: positive and negative control, respectively. M: 1 kb DNA ladder.
Figure 6. TYPH10F/R PCR products based on Vmp1 gene on 1% agarose gel., a–p: tomato and potato samples from Turkey. r and s: positive and negative control, respectively. M: 1 kb DNA ladder.
Pathogens 11 01031 g006
Pathogens 11 01031 g007 550
Figure 7. pDRAW32 1.1.147 generated RsaI digestion RFLP patterns of TYPH10F/TYPH10R PCR fragments of the Vmp1 gene after virtual digestion with the reference strains. The RsaI-RFLP profiles are labeled on top with the V nomenclature as suggested by the SEE-ERA.NET nomenclature [39]. The blue line has been added to make it easier to compare digested bands. M: marker HaeIII digested φX174 is shown on the right and left. Marker fragments length from top to bottom are 1353, 1078, 872, 603, 310, 281, 271, 234, 194, 118, and 72 bp.
Figure 7. pDRAW32 1.1.147 generated RsaI digestion RFLP patterns of TYPH10F/TYPH10R PCR fragments of the Vmp1 gene after virtual digestion with the reference strains. The RsaI-RFLP profiles are labeled on top with the V nomenclature as suggested by the SEE-ERA.NET nomenclature [39]. The blue line has been added to make it easier to compare digested bands. M: marker HaeIII digested φX174 is shown on the right and left. Marker fragments length from top to bottom are 1353, 1078, 872, 603, 310, 281, 271, 234, 194, 118, and 72 bp.
Pathogens 11 01031 g007
Pathogens 11 01031 g008 550
Figure 8. Unrooted phylogenetic tree constructed using ~1.4 kbp Vmp1 gene fragments of the ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains obtained in GenBank (Detailed information (host plant and origin country) about ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ strains used in the tree were provided in Supplementary Table S1). The phylogenetic analysis was performed with the neighbor-joining technique, and 1000 bootstrap replicates. The phytoplasma strain names, GenBank accession numbers, and related V types are given in the tree. The gene sequences obtained in this study are highlighted with red dots.
Figure 8. Unrooted phylogenetic tree constructed using ~1.4 kbp Vmp1 gene fragments of the ‘Ca. P. solani’ strains obtained in GenBank (Detailed information (host plant and origin country) about ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’ strains used in the tree were provided in Supplementary Table S1). The phylogenetic analysis was performed with the neighbor-joining technique, and 1000 bootstrap replicates. The phytoplasma strain names, GenBank accession numbers, and related V types are given in the tree. The gene sequences obtained in this study are highlighted with red dots.
Pathogens 11 01031 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Çağlar, B.K.; Şimşek, E. Detection and Multigene Typing of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’-Related Strains Infecting Tomato and Potato Plants in Different Regions of Turkey. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091031

AMA Style

Çağlar BK, Şimşek E. Detection and Multigene Typing of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’-Related Strains Infecting Tomato and Potato Plants in Different Regions of Turkey. Pathogens. 2022; 11(9):1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Çağlar, Behçet Kemal, and Eray Şimşek. 2022. "Detection and Multigene Typing of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’-Related Strains Infecting Tomato and Potato Plants in Different Regions of Turkey" Pathogens 11, no. 9: 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091031

APA Style

Çağlar, B. K., & Şimşek, E. (2022). Detection and Multigene Typing of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’-Related Strains Infecting Tomato and Potato Plants in Different Regions of Turkey. Pathogens, 11(9), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop