Next Article in Journal
Assessment of the Impact of Early Diagnosis and Early Treatment in the Integrated Control of East Coast Fever (ECF) Involving Acquired Immunity Induced by Natural Infection in Ankole Cattle
Next Article in Special Issue
Wild Mesocarnivores as Reservoirs of Endoparasites Causing Important Zoonoses and Emerging Bridging Infections across Europe
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery of a Novel Species Infecting Goats: Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Babesia aktasi n. sp.
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Presence of Dirofilaria immitis in Domestic Dogs on San Cristobal Island, Galapagos
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/pathogens12010114
Review Report
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Toxoplasma gondii and Alternaria sp.: An Original Association in an Immunosuppressed Dog with Persistent Skin Lesions

Pathogens 2023, 12(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010114
by Radu Blaga 1,*, Virginie Fabres 2, Vincent Leynaud 2, Jean-Jacques Fontaine 3, Edouard Reyes-Gomez 3, Amaury Briand 4, Odile Crosaz 4, Isabelle Lagrange 5, Amandine Blaizot 1, Delphine Le Roux 1, Veronica Risco Castillo 1, Pavlo Maksimov 6, Jacques Guillot 7, Jens Peter Teifke 8 and Gereon Schares 6
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pathogens 2023, 12(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12010114
Submission received: 9 December 2022 / Revised: 6 January 2023 / Accepted: 7 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pets, Wildlife and Parasites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this case report, the coinfection of Toxoplasma and Alternaria is demonstrated in a dog under immunosuppression treatments. While the study itself is pretty straightforward, the research is sound and the case explained clearly. In addition, there is an appropriate background and discussion to integrate the results. Hence, I have no further comments or suggestions and I endorse its publication in Pathogens. Nevertheless, I have one point that I would like to raise and know authors opinion about it. Despite finding Toxoplasma DNA in both the tissue and culture samples, have authors considered performing a Neospora-specific PCR to unequivocally rule out a mixed infection with minor amounts of Neospora that could not have been detected by IHC or in vitro culture? Even better, it would have been great to perform a PCR of a conserved region (e.g. 28S) that can amplify DNA from several apicomplexan parasites and later on sequence the amplified PCR product to see what parasite/s were present. I encourage authors to briefly discuss this issue in their manuscript. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is written in a clear and logical manner. The images are of good quality. Attention was given to details as the images were clearly labeled and annotated. 

I only have one critique. The method of PCR-RFLP genotyping was not clearly stated. How many markers did you use? What is your result? You cited the Andreopoulou et al., 2022 publication, however, the original methodology of PCR-RFLP was described in Su et al., 2016 paper. Please correct and clearly state your methodology even if it's from a publication. Please also use the 10 genetic markers to genotype your strain and report the ToxoDB number of the genotype. You should also discuss where this genotype was found and draw upon any previous data/publications/research findings to understand its distribution, virulence, etc.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop