Next Article in Journal
Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) Measurement Using Biosensors by Community-Based Village Malaria Workers and Hospital Laboratory Staff in Cambodia: A Quantitative Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Vector-Borne Pathogens in Guard Dogs in Ibadan, Nigeria
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential of Iminosugars as Antivirals for Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever Virus, Using the Surrogate Hazara Virus: Liquid-Chromatography-Based Mapping of Viral N-Glycosylation and In Vitro Antiviral Assays
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic and Morphological Identification of Spirometra decipiens in Snakes and Domestic Dog Found in Cuba
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Trapping Behaviour of Duddingtonia flagrans against Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle under Year-Round Grazing Conditions

Pathogens 2023, 12(3), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030401
by Silvina Fernández 1,2,*, Sara Zegbi 1,3, Federica Sagües 1,3, Lucía Iglesias 1,3, Inés Guerrero 1,3 and Carlos Saumell 1,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Pathogens 2023, 12(3), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030401
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 1 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Parasitic Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This document addresses a very interesting and practical topic, the usefulness of a biological control agent to reduce the risk of infection by gastrointestinal nematodes among grazing cattle. The investigation has been well designed and performed, congratulations to the authors. There are several points needing more attention:

1) The area where the experiments were performed is not described conveniently. More information regarding the geograpical localization is needed. There is a lack of data on the climatic conditions during each season. It is suggested that authors provide a climatic classification, i.e., Köppen classification, to allow that data collected can be extrapolated or compared with those from other areas in different countries.

2) In general, data should be provided as an average and a dispersion measure (SD, range...).

3) Is there any explanation for the highest numbers of L3s developed in winter? The differences in the counts of eggs in the fecal pats appears not clear enough. Please, explain.

4) The explanation about the chlamydospores used in winter should be provided in the Materials section, and not in the Discussion. Additionally, more detailed information is essential regarding the culturing and collection of chlamydospores, time elapsed...

5) A brief paragraph is needed in the Discussion regarding the quantity of chlamydospores added to the fecal pats. Besides this, the possibilities of such number of chlamydospores attain the fecal pat should be discussed. Would be the authors able to indicate an approximate amount of chlamydospores that cattle should ingest to ensure that al least a number of 11000 chlamydospores did attain the feces?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors determined the predatory ability of the nematophagous fungus Duddingtonia flagrans against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle during four experiments set up in different seasons. On the whole, I think the paper could merit publication in Pathogens, but after major revision.

1.     How the parasite population in faeces: Ostertagia, Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Cooperia and Oesophagostomum were identified? And is there any differenes between trapping behaviour of D. flagrans on the different nematodes?

2.     The daily maximum and minimum temperatures and rainfall varies in different seasons, is there any relationships between the indexes and predatory effects of the fungus?

3.     The figures use green and red as contrast colours, others are suggested to make red-green colour-blindness easy to read.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The revised version has improved a lot in both the language and presentation of results. And questions from the reviewer have been properly addressed.

Back to TopTop