Next Article in Journal
Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) Infection among Humans and Animals: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Prevention
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Characterization of Fecal Escherichia coli Isolates with Reduced Susceptibility to Beta-Lactam Antimicrobials from Wild Hogs and Coyotes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Postindustrial Landscapes Are Neglected Localities That May Play an Important Role in the Urban Ecology of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases—A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Seroepidemiological Analysis of Canine Leptospira Species Infections in Changchun, China

1
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Research of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China
2
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China
3
Nanchang Police Dog Base of the Ministry of Public Security, Nanchang 330100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2023, 12(7), 930; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070930
Submission received: 23 May 2023 / Revised: 9 June 2023 / Accepted: 15 June 2023 / Published: 12 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers on the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Leptospirosis is a significant worldwide zoonotic infectious disease that infects a wide range of animals and humans. Leptospira will colonize the animal’s urinary and reproductive systems and be excreted with urine, potentially causing a wide range of infections. Dogs are an essential host for Leptospira, and epidemiological investigation studies of leptospirosis must be conducted to clarify the prevalence of leptospirosis and to reduce the risk of transmission to humans. This study aimed to investigate the seroepidemiology of leptospiral infection in dogs from Changchun, China, using Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT). A total of 1053 canine blood samples were collected and tested by MAT. The positive rate of MAT was approximately 19.1%. The main prevalent Leptospira serogroups were L. Icterohaemorrhagiae (8.1%), L. Canicola (7.6%), L. Australis (5.3%), L. Ballum (4.7%) and L. Pyrogenes (4.2%). No statistically significant difference among different varieties, sexes and sampling seasons (p > 0.05), except the age (p < 0.05). The seropositive rate was much higher in adult and aged dogs than in juvenile dogs. Our results showed the seroprevalence and the prevalent serogroup of Canine leptospirosis in Changchun, China.

1. Introduction

Leptospirosis is a widely spread zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic leptospiral infection, and more than 200 animals, as well as humans, can be infected [1]. Mild conditions often present with fever and, like influenza, severe infections can present with multisystem impairments and, in extreme cases, are life-threatening [2,3]. Leptospira will reproduce continuously within the urinary and reproductive systems of animals, following the discharge of urine into the environment, where it can survive for months in a humid climate and is highly infectious [4,5]. Leptospirosis is transmitted to humans by direct or indirect contact with the urine of infected animals [6,7]. Leptospirosis is endemic in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, Oceania and South America [7,8]. Still, it has also been frequently reported in recent years in Europe, North America and Africa, among others [9,10,11]. At present, the prevalence of leptospirosis is expanding, and the endemic locations are not limited to tropical regions, so epidemiological investigation of leptospirosis and precise regional distribution of Leptospira serogroup are of great importance for the prevention of leptospirosis.
Dogs are the primary hosts for Canicola and Icterohaemorrhagiae serovars [12,13]. Infection in dogs may cause variable symptoms; moreover, some dogs may have mild or no signs of infection, and sometimes they may die [7,14]. Asymptomatic and chronic carriers may also become infectious agents [15]. People are in close contact with dogs, and infected dogs have the potential risk of transmitting Leptospira to humans [16,17]. So, Canine leptospirosis monitoring is beneficial to human leptospirosis prevention and control.
Laboratory diagnosis of leptospirosis can be made by several methods, including direct microscopic examination and culture, as well as serological and molecular methods, such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) [18]. The Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) is the gold standard serological test for leptospirosis and estimates the presence or absence of antibodies in the canine serum [2,19]. The MAT can recognize infected bacterial sera, facilitating the discovery of a possible source of infection in animals [20,21]. The MAT tests target leptospiral antibodies in serum, not Leptospira strains.
There are only a few epidemiological reports of canine leptospirosis in China, most based on surveys of cities in the south [22,23], which is consistent with the fact that leptospirosis occurs mainly in warm and humid parts of the south [24,25]. Changchun is located in the subtropical region of China. Although the number of canines is large, the epidemiological investigation of canine leptospirosis is lacking. In this study, the seroepidemiological analysis of Canine leptospirosis was conducted by MAT in Changchun, China.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Study Population

The study was conducted in Changchun, China. Changchun is the capital city of Jilin Province; the city has a latitude and longitude of 43°88′ N, 125°32′ E, and an elevation of 250–350 m. Changchun has a temperate monsoon climate with high temperatures and rain in summer. We collaborated with eight animal hospitals from June 2020 to May 2021 to collect canine blood (Figure 1). Information provided with canine blood included breed, sex, age, the time of blood collection, and the vaccine injection information for some dogs. No information could be determined about the dog owner. Therefore confidentiality was protected. Samples were excluded from the study with incomplete records for quality control checks or duplicate samples from a single dog.

2.2. Sample Preparation

The dog’s blood was obtained by sterile venipuncture, collected in a vacuum blood collection tube (anticoagulant EDTA), and placed in a 4 °C freezer. Then, the sample was transferred to the laboratory. Samples were centrifuged at 3000 r for 10 min; serum was separated and stored at −20 °C.

2.3. Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT)

Fifteen Leptospira representing fifteen different serogroups were included in this study (see Supplementary Table S1). All Leptospira were used for the microscopic agglutination test (MAT). Leptospira was grown in liquid Ellinghausen–McCullough–Johnson–Harris (EMJH) medium at 29 °C. The sera were diluted to 1:100 with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The serum samples were added to the live Leptospira cell suspensions in 96-well round-bottomed microtiter plates at room temperature in the dark for 2 h [26]. Negative and positive sera by adding live antigens were used as the control. Subsequently, an aliquot from wells was added on a slide and observed under 20× magnification using dark field microscopy (Olympus CX43RF, Tokyo, Japan). Every serum that gives an agglutination of at least 50% of the Leptospira or agglutination may occur, compared to the negative control, is considered positive [27].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Data were organized, summarized, and then analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9. Results with p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Chi-square test (χ2) was used to determine whether there is a substantial association in occurrences of leptospiral species antibodies in dogs according to varieties, age, sex, and season.

2.5. Ethical Issue

The purpose of the study was clarified to the dog’s owners and the family members, and then verbal informed consent was obtained from dog owners before blood sample collection. The design and process of the experiment strictly abide by the relevant national ethical principles of experimental animals, with the permission of the company’s Experimental Animal Management Committee and Ethics Committee, and carried out following the regulations of the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals in China. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jilin University (20170318).

3. Result

3.1. Sample Collection Results and Overall Seroprevalence

A total of 1053 canine blood samples were collected from June 2020 to June 2021 in Changchun pet hospital. There were 527 male and 526 female dogs in the sample population. Two hundred three dogs under one year old, 393 dogs 1–7 years old, and 457 dogs over seven years old (Table 1). The breeds of dogs were Poodle, Golden Retriever, Chinese rural dog, etc. Sampling times were counted by season (Table 2). There were 201 serums of 1053 tested positive by MAT, reflecting a seroprevalence of 19.1%. The main positive serogroups were L. Icterohaemorrhagiae (8.1%), L. Canicola (7.6%), L. Ballum (4.7%), L. Pyrogenes (4.2%) and L. Australis (5.3%), as presented in Table 3. Among the positive samples, there are 98 of 201 (48.76%) tested positive with at least two serogroups.

3.2. Association between Seropositive Rate and Risk Factors

There was a significant association between canine age and the seropositive rate (p < 0.05). Dogs less than one-year-old had the lowest positive rate. Dogs over the age of 1 year are more susceptible to leptospiral infection. The number of positive samples was the lowest in younger dogs (within one year). There was no significant association between seroprevalence and breed, sex, or sampling time (Table 4). Although female dogs had more positive samples than male dogs, it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

3.3. Effect of Leptospirosis Vaccine on Positive Samples

Of the total sample, 105 had been vaccinated against Leptospira within a year. Leptospira vaccine designations were replaced by LV-I, LV-II, LV-III and LV-IV; the number of samples was 36, 21, 45, and 3, respectively (Table 5). All of the vaccines contained the leptospiral serotypes Canicola and Icterohaemorrhagiae. Anti-leptospira antibodies were detected in 58 samples of 105. The vaccine immunization success rate is approximately 55.2%. The immunization success rate is higher in LV-I and LV-IV groups than in LV-II and LV-III groups (Table 5).

3.4. Excluding the Vaccine Factor, the Favorable Serogroups Distribution

Among the 58 immune samples, there are 29 samples tested positive, with only L. Icterohaemorrhagiae and L. Canicola serogroups. These 29 samples were discarded, leaving 172 of 1024 positive sera. The main positive serogroups were L. Icterohaemorrhagiae, L. Canicola, L. Ballum, L. Pyrogenes and L. Australis (Table 6). These five serogroups were combined in permutations, with four serogroups as one group. Corresponding to the combined serogroups group, the number of samples containing one or more serogroups will be counted and compared with the total samples. The results showed that serogroups group E had the highest proportion (Figure 2). If the serogroups of the Leptospira vaccine were made up of L. Icterohaemorrhagiae, L. Canicola, L. Pyrogenes and L. Australis, the protection rate might reach 91.86% theoretically (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Leptospirosis is considered to be an essential worldwide zoonotic disease [28]. Little studies have been carried out on Canine leptospirosis in Changchun, China. MAT conducted the seroepidemiological analysis of Canine leptospirosis in this study. According to MAT test results, 201 of 1053 dogs tested positive. Dogs also MAT test positive when infected with non-pathogenic Leptospira or subclinical infection. In this experiment, only antibodies in dog serum were detected. The MAT seroprevalence of dogs with Leptospira in Changchun was 19.1%. Our results are slightly lower than those of other countries [29,30]. In a study conducted in the city of Mashhad in 2003, the Leptospira seroprevalence in dogs was estimated at 41.6% [31], much higher than the rate in our study (19.1%). The possible reason is that Changchun is temperate, and others are tropical or subtropical. Leptospira spp. are more likely to survive in warmer environments.
There were 103 positive cases in female dogs and more than 98 positive cases in male dogs, but there was no statistical difference (Table 4). Studies have shown that the risk of leptospirosis in female dogs is significantly higher than in male dogs in other areas. Surveys have also shown significantly higher seropositive rates in male dogs because male dogs are thought to be more likely to roam and, thus, be exposed to infected environments [15]. There was a statistical difference between the age of dogs and the positive rate (p < 0.05). Seropositivity in dogs 1–7 years and over seven years is much higher than in dogs less than one-year-old (Table 4). This may be due to juvenile animals being bundle bound and less likely to roam or engage in activities that could lead to natural infections, thus reducing exposure. In New Zealand, the positive rate of leptospirosis is significantly lower in dogs over 12 years of age, which is associated with decreased physical function, vitality, and reduced exposure to infectious agents in older dogs [15]. In general, the greater the dog’s range, the higher the likelihood of exposure to the source of infection, the more susceptible to infection. Surveys in several countries of the European region have shown that the season of high incidence is summer and autumn [32,33]. In this study, the positive rate was higher in spring and autumn, but there was no significant difference.
It is generally accepted that L. Icterohaemorrhagiae and L. Canicola are the predominant serogroups of canine infection [12]. In our study, the other three serogroups, L. Australis, L. Ballum and L. Pyrogenes, accounted for more than half of the positive samples and should be concerned. Although pathogenic L. Pomona and L. Pyrogenes have not been reported in China, our team successfully isolated the L. Australis strain of Leptospirosis from an infected dog in 2020 [24]. These three types of Leptospira are likely to become potential pathogens and threaten dogs’ health. Humans are closely related to dogs, and dogs, as the storage host of Leptospira, may transmit it to humans and affect human health. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the prevalence of Leptospira. Recently, new vaccines containing an expanded spectrum of three or four serogroups (Icterohaemorrhagiae, Canicola, Grippotyphosa and/or Bratislava) have been introduced to the market [34]. Our data indicated that the vaccine serogroups used were not matched with the epidemic serogroups in Changchun. This study sheds light on Leptospira vaccine serogroup selection using L. Icterohaemorrhagiae, L. Canicola, L. Pyrogenes and L. Australis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens12070930/s1, Table S1: Leptospira strain used in MAT.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Z. and Y.C.; methodology, W.Z., N.S. and Y.D.; software, Y.D.; validation, S.Z., X.X. and W.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.D.; writing—review and editing, W.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.C. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32172872, 32202889) for Y.C. and W.Z., the Scientific research project of the Education Department of Jilin Province (No. 46005) for W.Z. and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (BX20220131) for X.X.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jilin University (20170318).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adler, B. Leptospira and Leptospirosis, in Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rajapakse, S. Leptospirosis: Clinical aspects. Clin. Med. 2022, 22, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Picardeau, M. Leptospira and Leptospirosis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2134, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. McCallum, K.E.; Constantino-Casas, F.; Cullen, J.M.; Warland, J.H.; Swales, H.; Linghley, N.; Kortum, A.J.; Sterritt, A.J.; Cogan, T.; Watson, P.J. Hepatic leptospiral infections in dogs without obvious renal involvement. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Alton, G.D.; Berke, O.; Reid-Smith, R.; Ojkic, D.; Prescott, J.F. Increase in seroprevalence of canine leptospirosis and its risk factors, Ontario 1998–2006. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2009, 73, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  6. Akhvlediani, T.; Bautista, C.T.; Garuchava, N.; Sanodze, L.; Kokaia, N.; Malania, L.; Chitadze, N.; Sidamonidze, K.; Rivard, R.G.; Hepburn, M.J.; et al. Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Brucellosis in the Country of Georgia. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Marami, L.M.; Gebremedhin, E.Z.; Sarba, E.J.; Tola, G.K.; Endalew, S.S.; Tesfaye, A.M.; Presti, V.D.M.L.; Vitale, M. Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Canine Leptospira and Brucella Species Infection in West Shewa Zone, Central Ethiopia. Vet. Med. 2021, 12, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kurilung, A.; Chanchaithong, P.; Lugsomya, K.; Niyomtham, W.; Wuthiekanun, V.; Prapasarakul, N. Molecular detection and isolation of pathogenic Leptospira from asymptomatic humans, domestic animals and water sources in Nan province, a rural area of Thailand. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 115, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Smith, J.K.G.; Young, M.M.; Wilson, K.L.; Craig, S.B. Leptospirosis following a major flood in Central Queensland, Australia. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 141, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Miraglia, F.; Matsuo, M.; Morais, Z.M.; Dellagostin, O.A.; Seixas, F.K.; Freitas, J.C.; Hartskeerl, R.; Moreno, L.; Costa, B.L.; Souza, G.O.; et al. Molecular characterization, serotyping, and antibiotic susceptibility profile of Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni isolates from Brazil. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 77, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Traxler, R.M.; Callinan, L.S.; Holman, R.C.; Steiner, C.; Guerra, M.A. Leptospirosis-Associated Hospitalizations, United States, 1998–2009. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1273–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Stull, J.W.; Evason, M.; Weese, J.S.; Yu, J.; Szlosek, D.; Smith, A.M. Canine leptospirosis in Canada, test-positive proportion and risk factors (2009 to 2018): A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0270313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Browne, E.S.; Callefe, J.L.R.; DE Jesus, E.R.; Zeppelini, C.G.; Cremonese, C.; Costa, F. A Systematic Review of the geographic distribution of pathogenic Leptospira serovars in the Americas, 1930–2017. An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2022, 94, e20201026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miotto, B.A.; Guilloux, A.G.A.; Tozzi, B.F.; Moreno, L.Z.; Da Hora, A.S.; Dias, R.A.; Heinemann, M.B.; Moreno, A.M.; Filho, A.F.D.S.; Lilenbaum, W.; et al. Prospective study of canine leptospirosis in shelter and stray dog populations: Identification of chronic carriers and different Leptospira species infecting dogs. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Harland, A.; Cave, N.; Jones, B.; Benschop, J.; Donald, J.; Midwinter, A.; Squires, R.A.; Collins-Emerson, J. A serological survey of leptospiral antibodies in dogs in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2013, 61, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nomura, A.; Imaoka, K.; Imanishi, H.; Shimizu, H.; Nagura, F.; Maeda, K.; Tomino, T.; Fujita, Y.; Kimura, M.; Stein, G.H. Human Brucella canis Infections Diagnosed by Blood Culture. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 1183–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lucero, N.E.; Corazza, R.; Almuzara, M.N.; Reynes, E.; Escobar, G.I.; Boeri, E.; Ayala, S.M. Human Brucella canis outbreak linked to infection in dogs. Epidemiol. Infect. 2010, 138, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Samrot, A.V.; Sean, T.C.; Bhavya, K.S.; Sahithya, C.S.; Chan-Drasekaran, S.; Palanisamy, R.; Robinson, E.R.; Subbiah, S.K.; Mok, P.L. Leptospiral Infection, Pathogenesis and Its Diagnosis—A Review. Pathogens 2021, 10, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goldstein, R.E. Canine Leptospirosis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2010, 40, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Harkin, K.R.; Roshto, Y.M.; Sullivan, J.T.; Purvis, T.J.; Chengappa, M.M. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction assay, bacteriologic culture, and serologic testing in assessment of prevalence of urinary shedding of leptospires in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2003, 222, 1230–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lizer, J.; Grahlmann, M.; Hapke, H.; Velineni, S.; Lin, D.; Kohn, B. Evaluation of a rapid IgM detection test for diagnosis of acute leptospirosis in dogs. Vet. Rec. 2017, 180, 517–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, W.; Lin, X.; Yan, J. Leptospira and leptospirosis in China. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 27, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yalin, W.; Lingbing, Z.; Hongliang, Y.; Jianmin, X.; Xiangyan, Z.; Xiaokui, G.; Utpal, P.; Jinhong, Q. High prevalence of pathogenic Leptospira in wild and domesticated animals in an endemic area of China. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2011, 4, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Song, N.; Zhang, W.; Ding, Y.; Wu, D.; Dai, Z.; Xu, L.; Cao, Y. Preliminary Characterization of Dog Derived Pathogenic Strains of Leptospira interrogans Serovar Australis in Nanchang of Jiangxi Province, China. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 607115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, C.; Xu, J.; Zhang, T.; Qiu, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, E.; Li, S.; Chang, Y.-F.; Guo, X.; Jiang, X.; et al. Genetic characteristics of pathogenic Leptospira in wild small animals and livestock in Jiangxi Province, China, 2002–2015. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Niloofa, R.; Fernando, N.; de Silva, N.L.; Karunanayake, L.; Wickramasinghe, H.; Dikmadugoda, N.; Premawansa, G.; Wickramasinghe, R.; de Silva, H.J.; Premawansa, S.; et al. Diagnosis of Leptospirosis: Comparison between Microscopic Agglutination Test, IgM-ELISA and IgM Rapid Immunochromatography Test. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Terpstra, W.J.; World Health Organization; International Leptospirosis Society. Human Leptospirosis: Guidance for Diagnosis, Surveillance and Control; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; p. 109. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hartskeerl, R.A.; Collares-Pereira, M.; Ellis, W.A. Emergence, control and re-emerging leptospirosis: Dynamics of infection in the changing world. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Venkataraman, K.; Nedunchelliyan, S. Epidemiology of an outbreak of leptospirosis in man and dog. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1992, 15, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lelu, M.; Muñoz-Zanzi, C.; Higgins, B.; Galloway, R. Seroepidemiology of leptospirosis in dogs from rural and slum communities of Los Rios Region, Chile. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fahimipour, A.; Khaki, P.; Moradi Bidhendi, S. Seroepidemiological Analysis of Leptospiral infection using MAT in Stray Dogs in Alborz, Iran. Arch. Razi Inst. 2021, 76, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Baranton, G.; Postic, D. Trends in leptospirosis epidemiology in France. Sixty-six years of passive serological surveillance from 1920 to 2003. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 10, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jansen, A.; Schöneberg, I.; Frank, C.; Alpers, K.; Schneider, T.; Stark, K. Leptospirosis in Germany, 1962–2003. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005, 11, 1048–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Eric Klaasen, H.L.; Adler, B. Recent advances in canine leptospirosis: Focus on vaccine development. Vet. Med. 2015, 6, 245–260. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The geographical location of Changchun City, Jilin Province and the location distribution of animal hospitals for sample collecting (gray dots). From June 2020 to May 2021, 1053 canine blood samples were collected from eight animal hospitals.
Figure 1. The geographical location of Changchun City, Jilin Province and the location distribution of animal hospitals for sample collecting (gray dots). From June 2020 to May 2021, 1053 canine blood samples were collected from eight animal hospitals.
Pathogens 12 00930 g001
Figure 2. Different serogroup combinations. The main positive serogroups, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Canicola, Ballum, Pyrogenes and Australis, were combined in permutations, with four serogroups as one group. The sum of the positive rate in each group was calculated.
Figure 2. Different serogroup combinations. The main positive serogroups, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Canicola, Ballum, Pyrogenes and Australis, were combined in permutations, with four serogroups as one group. The sum of the positive rate in each group was calculated.
Pathogens 12 00930 g002
Table 1. Dog age and sex statistics.
Table 1. Dog age and sex statistics.
AgeNumberTotal
MaleFemale
<1 years10697203
1–7 years201192393
>7 years220237457
Total5275261053
Table 2. Dog breeds, seasonal distribution statistics.
Table 2. Dog breeds, seasonal distribution statistics.
BreedNumberTotal
SpringSummerAutumnWinter
Poodle451025754258
Chinese rural dog22613723143
Golden Retriever1438271089
Bichon Frise643261085
Pomeranian1030101161
Labrador Retriever7249545
Bulldog71910642
Samoyed91213640
All other breeds381287747290
Total1584572661721053
Table 3. Statistics of positive samples of each serogroup.
Table 3. Statistics of positive samples of each serogroup.
SerogroupsNo. PositivePositivity Rate
(% of Positive Samples) a
Positivity Rate
(% of All Samples) b
Icterohaemorrhagiae8542.38.1
Javanica126.01.1
Canicola8039.87.6
Ballum4924.44.7
Pyrogenes 4421.94.2
Autumnalis63.00.6
Australis5627.95.3
Hebdomadis115.51.0
Paidjan21.00.2
a The number of positive samples for each serogroup represented the percentage of the total positive samples (201). b The number of positive samples for each serogroup represented the percentage of the total samples (1053).
Table 4. Relationship between possible risk factors and sample positivity.
Table 4. Relationship between possible risk factors and sample positivity.
VariableLevelNumber
(n = 1053)
No. PositivePositivity Rate
(%)
χ2p-Value
Sex 0.1660.684
Female52610319.6
Male5279818.6
Age 33.33<0.0001
<1 year203104.9
1–7 year3939323.7
>7 year4579821.4
Breed 8.8110.358
Poodle2586023.3
Chinese rural dog1432215.4
Golden Retriever891516.9
Bichon Frise851922.4
Pomeranian61914.8
Labrador Retriever45715.6
Bulldog421126.2
Samoyed40922.5
All other breeds2904916.7
Season 3.8410.279
Spring1583522.2
Summer4577716.9
Autumn2665821.8
Winter1723118.0
Table 5. The number of samples and rate of production of corresponding leptospiral antibodies after commercial vaccination of dogs against Leptospira spp.
Table 5. The number of samples and rate of production of corresponding leptospiral antibodies after commercial vaccination of dogs against Leptospira spp.
VaccineNumberNo. Positive (% of Level)
LV-I3623 (63.9)
LV-II2111 (52.4)
LV-III4522 (49.0)
LV-IV32 (66.7)
Table 6. Number and proportion of samples with MAT positive after excluding vaccine effects.
Table 6. Number and proportion of samples with MAT positive after excluding vaccine effects.
SerogroupsNo. PositivePositivity Rate (%) aOverall Positive Rate (%) b
Icterohaemorrhagiae5632.75.5
Javanica127.01.2
Canicola5230.25.1
Ballum4928.54.8
Pyrogenes 4425.64.3
Autumnalis63.50.6
Australis5632.65.5
Hebdomadis116.41.2
Paidjan21.20.2
a After excluding the 29 samples that produced only L. Icterohaemorrhagiae and L. Canicola antibodies, the total number of positive samples was 172. The positive samples of each serogroup accounted for the percentage of the total positive samples. b After excluding the 29 samples that produced only L. Icterohaemorrhagiae and L. Canicola antibodies, the total number of samples was 11,024. The positive samples of each serogroup accounted for the percentage of total samples.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xie, X.; Zhang, S.; Song, N.; Liu, Z.; Cao, Y. Seroepidemiological Analysis of Canine Leptospira Species Infections in Changchun, China. Pathogens 2023, 12, 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070930

AMA Style

Ding Y, Zhang W, Xie X, Zhang S, Song N, Liu Z, Cao Y. Seroepidemiological Analysis of Canine Leptospira Species Infections in Changchun, China. Pathogens. 2023; 12(7):930. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070930

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Yue, Wenlong Zhang, Xufeng Xie, Shilei Zhang, Ning Song, Zhanbin Liu, and Yongguo Cao. 2023. "Seroepidemiological Analysis of Canine Leptospira Species Infections in Changchun, China" Pathogens 12, no. 7: 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070930

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop