Next Article in Journal
Trypanosoma cruzi: Genomic Diversity and Structure
Previous Article in Journal
A Four-Year Study of Antibiotic Resistance, Prevalence and Biofilm-Forming Ability of Uropathogens Isolated from Community- and Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Southern Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Description of a Current Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States

1
Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
2
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2025, 14(1), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14010060
Submission received: 21 December 2024 / Revised: 8 January 2025 / Accepted: 9 January 2025 / Published: 11 January 2025

Abstract

:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant decline in Mycoplasma pneumoniae was observed; however, M. pneumoniae re-emerged globally in 2023. Here, we describe a current outbreak of M. pneumoniae infections in the United States (US). More than 287 million patient records from all 50 states in the US were reviewed to identify patients with a M. pneumoniae diagnosis between 1 January 2017 and 30 September 2024. A c-chart was created by calculating the mean and standard error (SE) of cases during the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period, with the upper control limit (UCL) set at 3 SE above the mean. The presence of an outbreak was defined as counts above the UCL. Cumulative excess cases were used to estimate the magnitude of the outbreak, and the fold increase was calculated. A US outbreak of M. pneumoniae began at the end of 2023, resulting in 9708 excess cases corresponding to a 9.0-fold increase over the baseline UCL. The outbreak is ongoing, affects both children and adults, and includes patients with M. pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. This US outbreak of M. pneumoniae has significant implications for the management of patients with respiratory infections during the current pneumonia season.

1. Introduction

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a well-recognized respiratory pathogen affecting children, adolescents, and adults that can cause community-acquired pneumonia severe enough to require hospitalization [1,2]. The organism has a slow incubation period ranging from one to four weeks and is associated with cyclic epidemics occurring every three to five years [3,4]. This extended incubation period may contribute to prolonged outbreaks, allowing the infection to spread undetected over time. The cyclical nature of these regular M. pneumoniae outbreaks is likely influenced by changes in population immunity. Following an outbreak, a significant proportion of those infected typically develops immunity, temporarily reducing the number of susceptible individuals and decreasing the potential for widespread transmission until immunity in the population wanes.
Several studies have observed a decrease in M. pneumoniae infections during the COVID-19 pandemic, likely due to public health measures such as masking, physical distancing, and reduced social interactions. Globally, a subsequent rebound in the number of infections to the pre-pandemic levels beginning in 2023 has been observed [5,6,7]. Local M. pneumoniae outbreaks have been reported in France and Switzerland [8,9,10]. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported an increase in M. pneumoniae infections among children and adolescents starting in the fall of 2023, although the number of cases remained below the pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels [11]. Additionally, in October 2024, the CDC issued an alert regarding an increase in the percentage of M. pneumoniae testing positivity across all age groups nationwide, with the most significant increase observed among children [12].
In the city of Louisville, Kentucky, we identified an increase in hospitalized adult patients with M. pneumoniae as part of an ongoing local respiratory infection surveillance study. These local findings prompted us to analyze national data with the goal of defining whether the local increase reflects a broader outbreak of M. pneumoniae infections within the United States.

2. Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of the United States Epic Cosmos database [13,14]. Epic Cosmos is a de-identified research database created in collaboration with a community of Epic health systems representing over 287 million patient records from over 1600 hospitals and 36,000 clinics from all 50 states in the United States and Washington D.C. as of the study period. More than 11 billion patient interactions with an Epic-using medical facility (encounters such as a clinic visit, emergency department visit, or hospitalization) from 1 January 2017 to 30 September 2024 were queried for analysis.
A patient was defined as having a M. pneumoniae infection if they met the following criteria: (1) they had a patient encounter at an Epic-using facility in the United States, and (2) they had a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for M. pneumoniae during that encounter. A positive test for M. pneumoniae was identified using specified Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) [14] (see Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials).
Patients with encounters during the timeframe of 1 January 2017 to 30 September 2024 were included in this analysis. Infections documented before the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic were defined as baseline infections from the timeframe of 1 January 2017 to 31 March 2020. Infections documented after the COVID-19 pandemic were defined as current infections from the timeframe of 1 July 2022 to 30 September 2024.
To identify the presence of an outbreak, all patients with M. pneumoniae were aggregated in annual quarters and depicted in count charts (c-charts) [15]. Additionally, c-charts were created for pediatric (age < 18) and adult (age ≥ 18) patients. Expected control limits were derived from the baseline infection period. The mean number of monthly cases (µ) and standard error (SE) were calculated for the baseline infections, with the upper control limit (UCL) set at 3 SE above the mean. The presence of an outbreak was defined as any quarter above the baseline UCL.
The number of excess cases for each annual quarter, if any, was calculated by taking the number of cases in excess of the baseline UCL. Cumulative excess cases for all patients, pediatric patients, and adult patients were calculated and depicted in line graphs. Additionally, excess cases for patients hospitalized with M. pneumoniae pneumonia were calculated. Cumulative excess cases of all patients, pediatric patients, and patients hospitalized with M. pneumoniae pneumonia were also depicted in line graphs. The magnitude of excess cases was defined as the fold increase in excess cases above the baseline UCL for the quarter with the highest excess.

Statistical Analysis

Patient demographics of age, sex, race, and ethnicity were compared between current infections and baseline infections. The severity of disease for baseline and current infections was measured by (1) the number of patients hospitalized with pneumonia, as defined by an admission using the tenth International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes to define pneumonia; (2) the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, defined by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes; and (3) the number of patients who died, defined by the Epic-reported disposition (see Tables S2 and S3 in the Supplementary Materials for ICD-10 and CPT codes).
C-chart epidemic curves and line graphs were produced to visualize the data. Data were aggregated by quarter. Baseline and current patient characteristics and the severity of disease were compared using Chi-Squared tests of independence. Groups with less than or equal to 10 observations were censored as ≤10 to prevent the identification of data. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data analyses were performed using R version 4.4.2.

3. Results

A total of 17,454 patients with M. pneumoniae infection were identified, with 3062 during the baseline period, and 14,007 during the current period. A total of 3946 patients were hospitalized with M. pneumoniae pneumonia, with 1000 patients hospitalized during the baseline period and 2830 hospitalized during the current period. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 385 patients with M. pneumoniae infection were observed, with 116 hospitalized. The study flow diagram is depicted in Figure 1.
The c-chart for patients with M. pneumoniae infection is depicted in Figure 2. Figure 3 depicts the c-charts for pediatric and adult patients with M. pneumoniae infection. During the baseline period, one point was observed above the UCL in the fourth quarter of 2019 for all patients and pediatric patients, and two points were observed above the UCL in the fourth quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020 in adult patients. During the current infection period, an outbreak started in the fourth quarter of 2023 and continued through the last observed quarter.
The cumulative excess case count for the current infection period was 9708 for all patients. The highest increase above the UCL, representing a 9.0-fold increase, was observed in the third quarter of 2024, the last quarter evaluated in the current infection period in this study. For pediatric patients, the cumulative excess was 7450, with a 10.0-fold increase over the baseline UCL observed in the third quarter of 2024. For adults, the cumulative excess was 2264, with a 6.6-fold increase over the baseline UCL also in the third quarter of 2024. Figure 4 depicts the cumulative excess cases for the current infection period.
Excess cases of patients hospitalized with M. pneumoniae pneumonia were also observed for the current infection period. Cumulative excess cases of 1870 for all patients, 1147 for pediatric patients, and 670 for adult patients, with a 7.7-fold, 8.6-fold, and 5.4-fold increase over the baseline UCL, respectively, were observed in the third quarter of 2024. Figure 5 depicts the cumulative excess cases of patients hospitalized with M. pneumoniae pneumonia for the current infection period.
Pediatric and adult patient demographics comparing baseline and current infection periods are depicted in Table 1. Overall, patient characteristics for both populations were similar between baseline and current infection periods.
The severity of disease for all patients is depicted in Table 2. A smaller proportion of patients with M. pneumoniae were hospitalized during the current infection period. The need for mechanical ventilation and the rate of death were similar among baseline and current infection periods in adults, and were infrequently observed in pediatric patients.

4. Discussion

This study provides evidence of an ongoing outbreak of M. pneumoniae infections in the United States that began in late 2023 and is affecting both pediatric and adult populations. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the current outbreak in the United States. Given the absence of a plateau in the number of new cases, it is likely that this outbreak will extend into the 2024–2025 winter pneumonia season. Analysis of the outbreak, including the number and magnitude of excess cases, indicates that the pediatric population is disproportionally more affected compared to the adult population.
Data from our study suggest that a regular cyclic outbreak of M. pneumoniae was developing in the United States by late 2019 but was abruptly interrupted by the occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic. This interruption was likely due to the introduction of non-pharmacological interventions against COVID-19. Similar outbreaks of M. pneumoniae were also reported in Europe and Asia at the end of 2019 [16]. We observed that detection of M. pneumoniae in the United States decreased significantly during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. A decrease in other bacterial respiratory pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae was also reported during the COVID-19 pandemic period [17]. This decline in infections likely resulted in decreased global population immunity, increasing susceptibility to M. pneumoniae as COVID-19-related restrictions were lifted. Although our data document an ongoing M. pneumoniae outbreak in the United States, it is possible that similar outbreaks are occurring in other regions with limited surveillance capabilities, leading to underdiagnosis on a global scale.
Aside from age, similar demographic characteristics were observed in patients with M. pneumoniae infection in the current and baseline periods, suggesting that the current outbreak is affecting a similar patient population. Unexpectedly, we did not document an increase in the severity of disease for M. pneumoniae infections in the current outbreak considering the lack of increase in the number of patients with pneumonia requiring hospitalization, the number of patients with need for mechanical ventilation, and the number of deaths compared to the pre-COVID-19 baseline period. These findings could be due to increased proportions of ambulatory testing using NAAT detection for respiratory pathogens that may have skewed the number of patients hospitalized.
The current outbreak is associated with a significant increase in cases of M. pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia, with patients of all ages requiring hospitalization for care. This resurgence has several implications for clinical practice: (1) Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for M. pneumoniae as a cause of respiratory infections, particularly in patients presenting with community-acquired pneumonia; (2) The diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infections is challenging since the organism is not detectable on Gram stain—due to the lack of a cell wall—and does not grow from respiratory or blood samples using standard culture methods. The primary method of diagnosis is NAAT to detect the genetic material of the organism from respiratory specimens; (3) M. pneumoniae is intrinsically resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics because it lacks a cell wall, the target for beta-lactam bactericidal activity. Consequently, empiric monotherapy with beta-lactams is ineffective against this pathogen; (4) The possibility of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae in hospitalized patients with pneumonia who fail to respond to macrolide therapy should be considered. Macrolide resistance in the US varies regionally, with reported rates between 2% and 22% [12]. Alternatives for treating macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae include tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones as clinical isolates with acquired resistance to these antibiotics have not been reported [18]; (5) clinicians should remain vigilant about the range of possible extrapulmonary manifestations of M. pneumoniae infections such as dermatological, cardiovascular, or neurological complications. These manifestations may be present in patients with minimal or absent respiratory symptoms [19].
This study has several strengths, including the capability to evaluate more than 280 million patients from across the United States, the ability to obtain data on M. pneumoniae infections before the COVID-19 pandemic to define a pre-pandemic baseline level of infections for comparison, the inclusion of patients with diagnosis based solely on positive NAAT of respiratory samples, and the capability to analyze subpopulations such as children and adults, with and without M. pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Since the Epic Cosmos database is standardized, reflects real-world clinical practice, and is representative of a large proportion of the United States population, our findings are likely highly generalizable across the country.
The primary limitations of this study include the lack of data on the total number of diagnostic tests ordered for M. pneumoniae infections, which did not allow us to calculate the percentage of positive tests. Additionally, in this analysis, we considered every positive test as a case of M. pneumoniae infection; therefore, if a patient had a positive test in a clinic and later required hospitalization for the same infection and was tested an additional time, while rare, this case would have been counted as two infections. Lastly, we were unable to assess the incidence of M. pneumoniae co-infections with other viral or bacterial respiratory pathogens.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study documents the presence of an ongoing outbreak of M. pneumoniae infections across the United States affecting both pediatric and adult populations. The current outbreak has significant implications for the management of patients with respiratory infections during the 2024–2025 winter pneumonia season. Continued surveillance at a national and global level is necessary to define the extent and clinical impact of this current M. pneumoniae outbreak.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens14010060/s1, Table S1: Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) queried to identify the presence of M. pneumoniae infection; Table S2: International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes queried to identify encounters pneumonia; Table S3: Study flowchart of patients with M. pneumoniae infections in the Cosmos database; Table S4: Rate of M. pneumoniae infection by US State or Territory.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R., S.F., T.C., S.R., W.M. and J.R.; methodology, A.R. and J.R.; validation, A.R., S.F., T.C. and J.R.; formal analysis, S.F. and T.C.; data curation, S.F., T.C., S.R. and W.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R., S.F., T.C. and J.R.; writing—review and editing, A.R., S.F., T.C., S.R., W.M. and J.R.; visualization, S.F. and T.C.; supervision, A.R. and J.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. It was reviewed by the Western-Copernicus Group (WCG) Institutional Review Board and the Norton Research Institute and considered exempt with waiver of consent.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was not obtained as this study was exempt with waiver of consent and utilized a de-identified dataset.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
COVID-19Coronavirus disease of 2019
SEStandard error
UCLUpper confidence limit
NAATNucleic acid amplification test
LOINCLogical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes
ICD-10Tenth International Classification of Diseases
CPTCurrent Procedural Terminology

References

  1. Jain, S.; Williams, D.J.; Arnold, S.R.; Ampofo, K.; Bramley, A.M.; Reed, C.; Stockmann, C.; Anderson, E.J.; Grijalva, C.G.; Self, W.H.; et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 835–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jain, S.; Self, W.H.; Wunderink, R.G.; Fakhran, S.; Balk, R.; Bramley, A.M.; Chappell, J.D. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization among U.S. Adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lind, K.; Benzon, M.W.; Jensen, J.S.; Clyde, W.A., Jr. A seroepidemiological study of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in Denmark over the 50-year period 1946–1995. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 13, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Atkinson, T.P.; Balish, M.F.; Waites, K.B. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and laboratory detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 32, 956–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. You, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, W.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, D.; Luo, Z.; Fu, Z. Epidemiological characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in hospitalized children before, during, and after COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in Chongqing, China. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1424554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Boyanton, B.L.; Frenner, R.A.; Ingold, A.; Ambroggio, L.; Kennedy, J.L. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic non-pharmacologic interventions temporally associated with reduced pediatric infections due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae and co-infecting respiratory viruses in Arkansas. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0290823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lan, S.; Gu, C.; Lu, S.; Zhou, N.; Qiao, X. Post-Pandemic Epidemiology of Respiratory Infections among Pediatric Inpatients in a Tertiary Hospital in Shanghai, China. Child 2024, 11, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Edouard, S.; Boughammoura, H.; Colson, P.; La Scola, B.; Fournier, P.-E.; Fenollar, F. Large-Scale Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection, Marseille, France, 2023–2024. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2024, 30, 1481–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zayet, S.; Poloni, S.; Plantin, J.; Hamani, A.; Meckert, Y.; Lavoignet, C.-E.; Gendrin, V.; Klopfenstein, T. Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in hospitalized patients: Who is concerned? Nord Franche-Comté Hospital, France, 2023–2024. Epidemiol. Infect. 2024, 152, e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Garzoni, C.; Bernasconi, E.; Zehnder, C.; Malossa, S.F.; Merlani, G.; Bongiovanni, M. Unexpected increase of severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adults in Southern Switzerland. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2024, 30, 953–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Edens, C. Notes from the Field: Reemergence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections in Children and Adolescents After the COVID-19 Pandemic, United States, 2018–2024. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2024, 73, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection Surveillance and Trends. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/mycoplasma/php/surveillance/index.html (accessed on 1 December 2024).
  13. Epic Systems. Epic Cosmos. Available online: https://cosmos.epic.com/ (accessed on 12 December 2024).
  14. Tarabichi, Y.; Frees, A.; Honeywell, S.; Huang, C.; Naidech, A.M.; Moore, J.H.; Kaelber, D.C. The Cosmos Collaborative: A Vendor-Facilitated Electronic Health Record Data Aggregation Platform. ACI Open 2021, 5, e36–e46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods. Available online: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ (accessed on 1 December 2024).
  16. Sauteur, P.M.M.; Beeton, M.L.; A Uldum, S.; Bossuyt, N.; Vermeulen, M.; Loens, K.; Pereyre, S.; Bébéar, C.; Keše, D.; Day, J.; et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae detections before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a global survey, 2017 to 2021. Eurosurveillance 2022, 27, 2100746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Brueggemann, A.B.; Jansen van Rensburg, M.J.; Shaw, D.; McCarthy, N.D.; Jolley, K.A.; Maiden, M.C.J.; van der Linden, M.P.G.; Amin-Chowdhury, Z.; Bennett, D.E.; Borrow, R.; et al. Changes in the incidence of invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis during the COVID-19 pandemic in 26 countries and territories in the Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance Initiative: A prospective analysis of surveillance data. Lancet Digit. Health 2021, 3, e360–e370. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Pereyre, S.; Goret, J.; Bébéar, C. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Current knowledge on macrolide resistance and treatment. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Narita, M. Classification of extrapulmonary manifestations due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection on the basis of possible pathogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study flowchart detailing patients with M. pneumoniae infection.
Figure 1. Study flowchart detailing patients with M. pneumoniae infection.
Pathogens 14 00060 g001
Figure 2. Epidemic curve c-chart for all patients with M. pneumoniae infection. The baseline upper control limit (UCL) is depicted by the dotted horizontal line. Points colored black represent frequencies within the UCL, and points in excess of the UCL are colored red.
Figure 2. Epidemic curve c-chart for all patients with M. pneumoniae infection. The baseline upper control limit (UCL) is depicted by the dotted horizontal line. Points colored black represent frequencies within the UCL, and points in excess of the UCL are colored red.
Pathogens 14 00060 g002
Figure 3. Epidemic curve c-charts for (a) pediatric patients and (b) adult patients with M. pneumoniae infection. The baseline upper control limit (UCL) is depicted by the dotted horizontal line. Points colored black represent frequencies within the UCL, and points in excess of the UCL are colored red.
Figure 3. Epidemic curve c-charts for (a) pediatric patients and (b) adult patients with M. pneumoniae infection. The baseline upper control limit (UCL) is depicted by the dotted horizontal line. Points colored black represent frequencies within the UCL, and points in excess of the UCL are colored red.
Pathogens 14 00060 g003
Figure 4. Cumulative excess cases of M. pneumoniae infections during the current infection period.
Figure 4. Cumulative excess cases of M. pneumoniae infections during the current infection period.
Pathogens 14 00060 g004
Figure 5. Cumulative excess cases of patients hospitalized with M. pneumoniae pneumonia in the current infection period.
Figure 5. Cumulative excess cases of patients hospitalized with M. pneumoniae pneumonia in the current infection period.
Pathogens 14 00060 g005
Table 1. Demographic comparison of baseline and current patients with M. pneumoniae infection.
Table 1. Demographic comparison of baseline and current patients with M. pneumoniae infection.
Patient DemographicsBaseline (n = 3062)Current (n = 14,007)p-Value
Age
  <1 years149 (4.9)426 (3.0)<0.001
  1–4 years563 (18.4)2448 (17.5)0.242
  5–9 years636 (20.8)3604 (25.7)<0.001
  10–17 years629 (20.5)3578 (25.5)<0.001
  18–44 years576 (18.8)2260 (16.1)<0.001
  45–64 years279 (9.1)868 (6.2)<0.001
  65–84 years200 (6.5)719 (5.1)0.002
  ≥85 years30 (1.0)104 (0.7)0.217
Sex at birth
  Male1609 (52.5)7332 (52.3)0.855
  Female1453 (47.5)6675 (47.7)0.855
Race and ethnicity 1
  White race2397 (78.3)10,468 (74.7)<0.001
  Black race346 (11.3)1856 (13.3)0.004
  Asian race107 (3.5)474 (3.4)0.802
  American Indian race41 (1.3)94 (0.7)<0.001
  Native Hawaiian race20 (0.7)74 (0.5)0.477
  Other race405 (13.2)2354 (16.8)<0.001
  Hispanic653 (21.3)2508 (17.9)<0.001
1 Race and ethnicity were not mutually exclusive and may add up to more than 100%.
Table 2. Severity of disease for baseline and current patients with M. pneumoniae infection.
Table 2. Severity of disease for baseline and current patients with M. pneumoniae infection.
Severity of DiseasePediatric (Age < 18 Years)Adult (Age ≥ 18 Years)
Baseline
(n = 1977)
Current
(n = 10,045)
pBaseline
(n = 1085)
Current
(3962)
p
Hospitalization with pneumonia, n (%)505 (25.5)1543 (15.4)<0.001495 (45.6)1287 (32.5)<0.001
Need for mechanical ventilation, n (%)≤10 (*)≤10 (*)- 135 (3.2)87 (2.2)0.067
Death, n (%)≤10 (*)≤10 (*)- 1≤10 (*)23 (0.6)- 1
* Percentage not reported due to suppressed data in order to maintain patient confidentiality. 1 Comparison not performed due to suppressed data in order to maintain patient confidentiality.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raghuram, A.; Furmanek, S.; Chandler, T.; Rashid, S.; Mattingly, W.; Ramirez, J. Description of a Current Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States. Pathogens 2025, 14, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14010060

AMA Style

Raghuram A, Furmanek S, Chandler T, Rashid S, Mattingly W, Ramirez J. Description of a Current Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States. Pathogens. 2025; 14(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14010060

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raghuram, Anupama, Stephen Furmanek, Thomas Chandler, Salwa Rashid, William Mattingly, and Julio Ramirez. 2025. "Description of a Current Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States" Pathogens 14, no. 1: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14010060

APA Style

Raghuram, A., Furmanek, S., Chandler, T., Rashid, S., Mattingly, W., & Ramirez, J. (2025). Description of a Current Outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the United States. Pathogens, 14(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14010060

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop