Next Article in Journal
Biocontrol of Cereal Crop Diseases Using Streptomycetes
Previous Article in Journal
Variable and Variant Protein Multigene Families in Babesia bovis Persistence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/pathogens8020077
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Mosquito Immune System and the Life of Dengue Virus: What We Know and Do Not Know

by
Debica Mukherjee
,
Sandeepan Das
,
Feroza Begum
,
Sweety Mal
and
Upasana Ray
*
CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032, West Bengal, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2019, 8(2), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8020077
Submission received: 4 April 2019 / Revised: 29 May 2019 / Accepted: 30 May 2019 / Published: 13 June 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Flaviviruses are largely transmitted to humans by their arthropod vectors such as mosquitoes or ticks. The dengue virus (DENV) is one of the members of the family Flaviviridae and is the causative agent of dengue fever. In the mosquito vector, DENV enters through viremic blood meal and replicates in the mid-gut. Newly formed virion particles circulate to various mosquito organs and get transmitted to the next host in subsequent bites. Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus have intricate immune control to allow DENV production at a sub-pathogenic level. In the mosquito, antimicrobial peptides (AMP) and RNA inference (RNAi) are the two main antiviral strategies used against DENV. Apart from innate immunity, mosquito resident microbes play a significant role in modulating DENV replication. In this review, we discuss different immune mechanisms and preventive strategies that act against DENV in two of its vectors: Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.

1. Introduction

Vector-borne diseases such as yellow fever, dengue fever, etc. are known for their chronic effects on human health. These diseases are spread by vectors such as mosquitoes and other arthropods. Mosquitoes are known to be an important vector of virus transmission. Geographically, tropical and subtropical areas are the most suitable regions for optimal growth of mosquitoes and thus mosquito borne diseases pose great risk the world over.
The dengue virus (DENV) is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae and is transmitted to humans and other primates by Aedes mosquitoes, importantly Aedes aegypti (Ae. aegypti) and Aedes albopictus (Ae. albopictus). In humans, DENV infection causes dengue fever (DF) and in severe cases, dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) or dengue shock syndrome (DSS). In the transmission cycle, upon injection into the human body, the virus gains entry into the host’s cells, hijacks the host’s cell machinery to replicate, and escapes the host’s immune strategies to elicit pathology symptoms [1]. Conversely, in the mosquitoes, the virus replicates, but it is under strong immune control so that the vector’s life span is not compromised. DENV can inhibit mosquito immunity to an extent that allows it to multiply to a non-pathogenic level [2]. Thus, a fine immunological balance exists in the mosquito so that the virus can persist and multiply.
A female mosquito needs to feed on vertebrate blood before egg laying for egg maturation. The virus enters the mosquito’s system via viremic blood and infects the midgut epithelial cells. It replicates in the midgut cells and then gets released into the hemocoel and disseminates to other tissues via hemolymph, ultimately reaching the salivary glands to infect fresh hosts in subsequent bites.
In the mosquitoes, innate immunity and a resident microbiome work together against DENV. This review summarizes the molecular mechanism of immune function in the mosquito system against DENV pathogenesis (Figure 1).

2. Innate Immunity

The mosquito’s innate immunity includes three main strategies:
  • Antiviral signaling pathways: Toll-like pathway, immune deficiency (IMD), and Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway.
  • Complement-like proteins: These include Thioester-containing proteins (TEP); A. aegypti macroglobulin complement related factor (AaMCR) and A. aegypti homolog of scavenger receptor-C (AaSR-C).
  • Small RNAs: These include small interfering RNA (siRNA), micro RNA (miRNA) (derived from the virus), and PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA).

3. Antiviral Signaling Pathways

Toll-like pathway: In Ae. Aegypti, dorsal ortholog Rel1 and Relish ortholog Rel2 act as Toll and IMD pathway components, respectively, and induce expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [3]. It was observed that ten days post infection with DENV, the oxidative damage preventative enzymes are suppressed, but Toll and JAK-STAT pathway effectors along with pathogen recognition receptor (PRR) expression are up-regulated [3]. The Toll pathway is a powerful anti-dengue defense system for Ae. aegypti, as well as against multiple DENV serotypes [4].
Toll receptor activation requires virus-derived ligand binding to unknown extracellular PRRs and proteolytic cleavage of pro-spaetzle to activate the cytokine spaetzle, which is the ligand for the transmembrane receptor of the Toll pathway [5]. Spaetzle activates the Toll receptor by cross-linking of receptor ectodomains followed by the relay of the signal through adaptor proteins (Figure 2).
Immune deficiency (IMD) pathway: The immune deficiency pathway operates by virus-receptor binding followed by recruitment of adaptor proteins. In Drosopila, the IMD signaling pathway activates an NF-kβ transcription factor, Relish, whereas in mosquitoes, Relish ortholog Rel2 acts as a transcription factor. The IMD pathway in mosquitos gets activated when a virus binds to an unknown receptor [6], which recruits various adaptor proteins. Henceforth, the pathway has two segments as described in Figure 2, one of which activates the Janus kinase (JNK) signaling that phosphorylates Rel2 [7,8], the other part recruits IMD, FADD (fas-associated death domain), and DREDD (death related ced-3/Nedd2-like protein) proteins to cleave the phosphorylated Rel2 [8]. Cleaved Rel2 eventually transcribe IMD related AMP genes (Diptericin and Cecropin) and a signaling molecule called Vago, which is known to have an antiviral role against West Nile virus and Drosophila C virus [9,10]. Vago is secreted from the infected cell and acts as a ligand for the JAK-STAT pathway in the neighboring cells (Figure 2).
DENV infection significantly up-regulates the expression of cecropin-like AMPs [11]. Another study revealed that activation of the IMD pathway by inhibiting the negative regulator (Casper) have no effect on DENV in the midgut of a susceptible Ae. Aegypti strain [3,12] whereas in a refractory Ae. Aegypti strain, blocking IMD pathway results in an increase in viral replication [12].
In Drosophila, IMD is linked to a protein complex (TAK1/TAB2) via a polyubiquitin chain. The TAK1/TAB2 complex leads to the activation of one segment of the IMD pathway [13]. However, in mosquitoes, the Ubiquitine variant (Ub3881) lacks one of the essential lysine residues. Hence, Ub3881 possibly has other residues that target the DENV envelope protein for degradation and down-regulate the production of infectious virus particle [14,15].
The JAK-STAT pathway is an essential defense pathway for anti-dengue immunity in invertebrates [11,16]. In Ae. aegypti, the JAK-STAT pathway is activated by different ligands. Unpaired (Upd) is the common ligand that binds to its receptor Dome. Receptor dimerization leads to activation of receptor-associated JAK and downstream signaling (Figure 2).
According to Souza-Neto et al., mosquitoes become more susceptible to DENV infection if the receptor Dome or JAK homolog HOP is suppressed by RNA inference (RNAi). On the other hand, DENV resistance increases if the negative regulator of the JAK-STAT pathway, protein inhibitor of activated STAT (PIAS) blocks the signaling [16]. The effector genes of DENV are named dengue virus restriction factors (DVRFs). DVRF 1 is the transmembrane receptor of the pathway and DVRF 2 recognizes the virus by the antifreeze and allergen domains. The allergen domain has been reported in Anopheles gambiae pattern recognition receptor (PRR) MDL1 immune gene. MDL1 immune gene is known to have anti-plasmodium activity. Hence, DVRF2 could be a PRR and be involved in DENV recognition [16].
Although these main signaling pathways restrict viral propagation to non-pathogenic levels, DENV multiplies and accumulates in salivary glands, making the vector a competent virus transmitter.

4. Organ-Specific Antiviral Strategies

Mid-gut: The mid-gut (Figure 3A) is the initial tissue that comes into contact with the virus-containing blood meal. The first line of defense in the mid-gut are physical barriers such as the mid-gut infection barrier (MIB) and mid-gut escape barriers [17,18,19,20]. The mid-gut infection barrier may form due to the lack of entry receptors on the epithelial cells [17] or pathogen compartmentalization by the peritrophic matrix [18]. After successful entry of the virus inside midgut cells, uncoating, replication, and new virus particle assembly occurs. If the newly formed virions are not able to cross the basal lamina of the epithelial cells to spread in the hemolymph or are unable to infect secondary organs, the prevention of these events are referred to as midgut escape barriers (MEB) [19]. In Ae. aegypti, the innate immune signaling pathways become active during DENV infection. Exogenous siRNA pathways work against viral infection in the midgut (Figure 3B) [21]. Additionally, the gut microbiome plays an important role (discussed later).
Hemolymph: From the mid-gut, DENV is released into the hemocoel, then disseminated to other organs. In hemolymph, hemocytes allow virus replication, but innate immunity limits the distribution. Host nitric oxide (NO) inhibits DENV replication in hemocytes. NO production increases during infection and exogenous NO reduces the DENV replication level (Figure 3C) [22].
Complement related proteins: Another defense mechanism in the hemolymph, which controls flaviviral infection, comprises the complement-related proteins. The mosquito genome encodes a thioester-containing protein (TEP) that recognizes flaviviruses and leads to the expression of an antimicrobial peptide [23]. Ae. aegypti macroglobulin complement related factor (AaMCR) belongs to the insect TEP family, which recognizes viral particles. The Ae. aegypti homolog of the Scavenger receptor C (AaSR-C) mediates the binding of AaMCR to the DENV particles [24]. Thus, when expression of AMPs in the hemocytes is up-regulated, AMP diffuses to the hemolymph and plays an anti-dengue role (Figure 3C).
Salivary glands (SGs): Salivary glands contain the major pool of the virus before transmission. Active replication of the DENV occurs leading to a high virus titer. In the SGs, the virus again has to pass through salivary gland infection and escape barriers (SGIB and SGEB), which are the ultimate restriction points before virus transmission. The SGIB may form due to the lower amount of virus titer in the hemolymph [25] or the presence of the basal lamina of the SG cells, which hide cellular entry receptors [26]. The SGEB may result because of incomplete apoptosis of the SG acinar cells, which is required for the virus to release via saliva [27]. The DENV induces multiple immune effectors in the salivary glands. In Ae. Aegypti, Toll and IMD pathways are activated and this gives rise to a putative antibacterial peptide, cecropin-like peptide (CEC-like peptide) (Figure 3E), which shows anti-DENV activity [11]. Other immune regulatory genes that are upregulated in a DENV infection include the Toll pathway receptor and adaptor proteins (Toll5A and MYD88). However, a peptide from the Defensin family is markedly downregulated [11].
In the SGs, complement-like factors AaMCR and AaSR-C have a role as antivirals that mediate virus recognition and AMP production [24]. Putative cystatin (CS) gene expression and ankyrin repeat containing protein (ARP) gene expression also increase in the DENV infection along with 12 other immune modulator genes (Figure 3E) [28]. Silencing of these genes results in an increased viral load, which indicates their role in antiviral immunity.
Neuronal system: The neuron-specific resistance mechanism of mosquitoes against viral infection is largely underexplored. In mosquito brains, an immune factor named Ae. aegypti homolog of Hikaru Genki (AaHig) is expressed ubiquitously [29]. The Aahig protein contains the conserved immunoglobulin domain and complement control protein domain (CCP) (Sushi domain) [29]. The AaHig protein specifically localizes at membranes of the neural cells and its CCP domain interacts with the surface envelope proteins of the flaviviruses. The binding of AaHig to the virus envelope directly blocks viral entry (endocytosis) (Figure 3D).
Antimicrobial peptides/proteins: Antimicrobial peptides/proteins (AMPs) are the main components of the humoral immune response and are synthesized in fat bodies, hemocytes, and epithelial cells in response to DENV infection [24]. AMPs are secreted into hemolymph, distributed to different organs, and display antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of microorganisms. In response to microbial invasion, multiple signaling pathways get activated such as the IMD, Toll, and JAK-STAT pathways, with the JAK-STAT pathway being the most important in the case of viral infection [16]. These signaling events lead to production of AMPs that are the important immune effectors. AMPs have also been shown to be important for maintaining mosquito gut immunity [3]. Seventeen AMPs have been discovered in A. aegypti and are classified into five independent groups: cysteine-rich defensins, alpha helical peptides cercopins, cysteine-rich peptides gambicins, glycine-rich peptides attacins, and diptericins. Defensins are the predominant AMPs of the Aedes mosquitoes, the production of which is induced in response to infection by bacteria, filarial worms, and viruses [30]. Defensins are cysteine-rich in nature [31] and have been shown to function by attaching to cell membranes, leading to pore formation, which causes efflux of various essential nutrients [32]. DENV-2 infection-induced defensin expression in C6/36 cells was enhanced with increased viral multiplicity of infection (MOI). Defensins A, C, and D were found to increase due to DENV infection [24]. Cecropins are small proteins which inhibit proline uptake, causing leaky membranes. Cecropins have several isoforms and many of them were found to increase during DENV infection. They can lyse cellular membranes in the case of bacteria and are also capable of inhibiting proline uptake and inducing membrane leakage [33,34]. A 59 amino-acid peptide (AAEL000598) ceropin isolated from the salivary glands of Ae. aegypti showed antiviral activity against both the DENV and Chikungunya viruse [7]. Cercopin P1 has been shown to inhibit release of viral particles [35]. Gambicin is another AMP found in mosquitoes and other insects, the mature form of which is a 61 residue peptide having eight cysteins connected with four disulfide bridges. Gambicin expression increases by more than two-fold during a DENV2 infection of Ae. aegypti [24]. Attacin is a 20 kD protein that acts by inhibiting biosynthesis of the outer membrane proteins in gram-negative bacteria [24]. Attacin mRNA levels increase due to DENV infection in mosquitoes. The same study reported a slight increase of yet another AMP called ‘diptericin’ during DENV2 infection in Ae. Aegypti.
Although the expressions of defensin, cecropin, and gambicin increase during viral infection in mosquitoes and other insects, their mechanism of action is still unclear and needs further research. In contrast, the other two AMPs, namely attacin and diptericin, have been shown to exert an antiviral response in Drosophila by controlling viral RNA synthesis during Sindbis virus (SINV) infection, and knocking down these genes increases the viral load in Drosophila [36]. Although the importance of AMPs in mosquito immunity is now an established fact, technical difficulties in the isolation of hemocytes (AMP production site) and the unavailability of suitable cell lines have made the characterization of the molecular mechanisms of AMP function challenging. The importance of AMPs as immune effectors and antiviral agents warrants detailed investigation of their molecular mechanisms of action.

5. Small RNA Mediated Immunity

siRNA: Small interfering RNA (siRNA) is one of the important components of the RNAi mechanism (Figure 4). Gaines et al. showed that infection of C6/36 cells with a double subgenomic Sindbis (dsSIN) virus-carrying precursor of the membrane (prM) coding region of the DENV2, provides resistance against DENV2 but not DENV3 and DENV4 [37]. Northern blot and immunofluorescence confirmed the presence of sense and antisense prM RNA and prM proteins, respectively, in the infected cells. RNAi as an innate antiviral immunity mechanism against the DENV was confirmed when expression of untranslatable prM in C6/36 cells showed resistance against DENV2. Expressing dsRNA derived from the genome of the DENV in C6/36 cells restricts DENV2 replication [38]. Intrathoracic injection of a dsSIN virus containing the prM of DENV2 in Ae. aegypti restricted DENV2 RNA accumulation in the head tissue, salivary glands, and midgut [39]. DENV2 serotype-specific vsiRNAs are generated upon infection in Ae. Aegypti, and knockdown of the siRNA pathway components dcr2, Ago2, and r2d2 leads to an increase in viral replication and shortening of the extrinsic incubation period [21].
It was found that DCR2 and AGO2 transcript levels were significantly increased in the midgut with DENV infected blood meal in the early days of infection, but the levels were equalized in later stages [40]. Direct transfection of synthetic siRNA against the membrane glycoprotein precursor gene of DENV1 in C6/36 cells reduced the viral load and increased cell survival rate [41,42].
Previously, it was thought that the siRNA mediated RNAi against the virus by a local and cell-autonomous phenomenon, but recent studies have shown that the RNAi signal can pass from one cell to another. In insects, the virus-derived siRNA can pass from an infected cell to a non-infected cell via gap junctions or cytoplasmic bridges, thereby transferring the RNAi response to neighboring cells.
miRNA: In the mosquito, miRNAs can interact with RNA viruses either directly or indirectly (Figure 5), where the direct interaction involves binding of the miRNA to the viral RNA genome, and the indirect interaction introduces a virus-mediated change in the host transcriptome [43]. In a time-dependent miRNA expression profile study in Ae. aegypti, it was shown that at 2–4 days post-exposure (dpe), five miRNAs were modulated, but this increased to twenty-three at 9 dpe. In silico analyses revealed 464 gene targets when miRNA bound to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR). These genes include those expressing proteins involved in transport, transcriptional regulation, mitochondrial function, chromatin modification, and signal transduction processes that help in viral replication and dissemination. A number of endogenous miRNAs are induced after blood feeding in Ae. aegypti (e.g., aae-miR-375). The targets of aae-miR-375 include two immune-related genes, cactus and REL1. Cactus is upregulated by aae-miR-375, whereas REL1 is downregulated. The aae-miR-375 also enhances DENV2 replication during infection [44]. In Ae. albopictus, sixty-six differentially expressed miRNAs were identified during DENV infection. Among these, miR-34-5p, which was upregulated, targets the Toll pathway signaling protein (REL-1), and the peptidoglycan recognition protein LE and AMP defensin D. miR87, which were down-regulated, target the Toll pathway [45].
During persistent viral infection, the miRNA expression profile changes [46]. Some of miRNAs that are upregulated are miR-927, miR-87, miR-210, miR-2a3p, miR-190, and miR-970 whereas the miRNAs that are downregulated include miR-252, miR-263a-3p, miR-92b, miR-10-5p, miR-9a-5p, miR-9a-1, miR-124, miR-286a, and miR-286b [46]. Studies of the targets for these miRNAs revealed target proteins to be those involved in ubiquitination, innate immune response, oxidative stress response, cytoskeletal maintenance, fatty acid biosynthesis, intracellular protein transport, exocytosis, autophagy, and pH regulation [46]. Modulation of protein expression by miRNAs helps in maintaining an equilibrium between viral replication and host antiviral response during persistent infection.
MicroRNAs like viral small (vs) RNAs are produced from the viral genome. Twenty-three microRNA-like vsRNAs were identified and were found to originate from the 5′UTR and 3′UTR of the DENV2 in the argonaute 2 (AGO2) dependent pathway [47]. Among those, DENV-vsRNA-5 was found to inhibit DENV2 replication by targeting the non-structural protein-1 (NS1). Recently, researchers have been trying to develop transgenic mosquitoes that are resistant to DENV infection and transmission. A genetically engineered Ae. aegypti was developed, in which artificial antiviral miRNA genes were introduced under the polyubiquitin promoter targeting the DENV3 non-structural proteins NS2B, NS3, and NS5. This reduced the DENV3 transmission rate effectively [48].
piRNA: piRNAs are 24–30 nucleotides long, small RNA formed from the intergenic region termed a piRNA cluster and are processed from the single-stranded piRNA precursor (pre-piRNA) via a dicer-independent mechanism [49] (Figure 6).
In Drosophila melanogaster, pre-piRNAs are trimmed at both the 5′ and 3′ ends by mitochondria-associated nuclease Zucchini (Zuc) [50] and by an unknown 3′-5′ exonuclease [51]. The piRNAs are loaded onto PIWI proteins before 3′ trimming and are 2′-O-methylated at the 3′ end by a methyltransferase, DmHen1/Pimet, forming mature PIWI-piRNA complexes [52]. Aub- and PIWI-bound primary piRNAs are antisense and uridine (1U) biased at the 5′ end. AGO3 binds to these piRNAs to form the piRNA-induced silencing complexes (piRISCs) which are transported to the nucleus to cleave complementary target transcripts. This process generates a new secondary sense piRNA that pairs with the antisense piRNA precisely by 10 nts at the 5′end. This secondary piRNA specifically contains adenosine at position 10 (10A°) and again undergoes the same process of 2′-O-methylation at the 3′ end followed by AGO3 binding to generate Aub-bound piRNAs. This piRNA amplification loop is referred to as the “ping-pong” cycle [53,54].
The piRNAs play a role in the innate antiviral response in insects. Virus infection induced piRNAs were first observed in Drosophila ovarian somatic sheet (OSS) cells [42]. In a small RNA profile in C6/36 cells after DENV infection, a high read peak was found in 27 nts-long RNAs and these viral small RNAs were positive sense [55]. Dicer2 activity was found to be significantly very low in C6/36 cells, indicating the possibility of an alternate mechanism for production of these 24–30 nts-long vsRNAs. A time-dependent small RNA profiling of DENV infected Ae. aegypti showed that 24–30 nts-long RNA reads were high at two days post infection (dpi) but these read percentages decreased after 9 dpi. These 24–30 nts-long RNAs were considered as viral piRNA (vpiRNA) and were slightly 10A biased, but had no preference for uridine at the 5′extreme as seen in other piRNAs [41]. In a comprehensive analysis of both viral and host-derived small RNAs in DENV2 infected Ae. aegypti Aag2 cells, all three types of small RNAs were identified, which include vsiRNAs, host miRNAs, and viral piRNAs. Knockdown of PIWI5 and Ago3 resulted in the reduction of these vpiRNA levels, confirming that Aedes PIWI proteins are associated with the production of DENV-derived vpiRNAs [56]. Both vpiRNAs and virus-induced host endogenous piRNAs (vepiRNAs) produced in DENV2 infected Ae. albopictus were found to be confined to specific hot spot regions in the DENV-2 genome, especially in the NS5 gene region [57].
Endogenous viral elements derived from non-retroviral RNA viruses have been identified in different mosquito species. In Ae. aegypti and Ae. Albopictus, a large number of non-retroviral integrated RNA viruses (NIRVS) were identified including flaviviruses [58]. NIRVS were associated with the piRNA cluster. Three endogenous flaviviral elements (EFVE) identified from Ae. albopictus cell lines and one from Ae. aegypti cell lines produce 27 to 29 bases-long small RNAs, which were 1U biased and antisense to the viral open reading frame (ORF). DENV infection did not affect the EFVE-derived transcript level, which also suggests constitutive expression. PIWI proteins were found to be associated with the production of this EFVE-derived small RNA. This indicates a complex NIRVS-derived small RNA-mediated antiviral defense in mosquitoes.

6. Microbial Community

Role of gut microbiomes: The gut microbiome forms a complex ecological environment and can influence vector competence in various ways. In a gut microbiome study, 40 different types of bacteria were isolated from the gut of Ae. aegypti [59]. These bacteria upregulated antimicrobial peptide gene transcription. Chromobacterium sp. (Csp_P) were isolated from the midgut of field-collected Ae. aegypti. Csp_P showed entomopathogenic activity, as its exposure to larval breeding water and ingestion by adult mosquitoes reduced survival of both the larvae and adult. During Csp_P colonization, cecropin E and G and defensin C displayed at least a two-fold increase in transcript abundance in the midgut. Colonization of Csp_P in the midgut also inhibited DENV infection in Ae. aegypti [60]. Very little is known about the gut mycobiome, and only a few members of fungi have been characterized. Talaromyces (Tsp) was isolated from the gut of field-caught Ae. aegypti and found to render mosquitoes more permissive to DENV infection.
The Talaromyces (Tsp) secretome was found to have a profound modulating effect on the midgut transcriptome. It downregulates trypsin encoding genes involved in blood digestion and also reduces trypsin enzymatic activity, which may play a role in the promotion of DENV infection in the midgut [61].
Wolbachiamediated defence: Dengue infection in Aedes mosquitoes has been reported to be suppressed in the presence of Wolbachia species, gram negative endosymbiotic bacteria [62]. DENV-2 dissemination to secondary organs is inhibited by Wolbachia in Ae. albopictus [63]. In spite of being a natural host of Wolbachia, Ae. albopictus becomes a competent vector for the DENV because of the restricted tissue tropism of the wFLu Wolbachia strain in Ae. albopictus. In the case of Aedes aegypti, it is transinfected with Wolbacia strains wMel and wMelPop, which makes the mosquitoes resistant to DENV infection [64]. These two strains show organ-specific restriction with wMelPop giving strong resistance towards DENV in the mid-gut tissue and salivary glands while wMel acts on salivary glands only. Another study also reported the absence of DENV-2 particles post infection in female Ae. aegypti with wMel [65].
Although the mechanism of virus resistance by the Wolbachia species is not fully understood, possible mechanisms include competition for host resources, indirect connection to immune signaling pathways, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. A recent study revealed that DENV-derived subgenomic flaviviral RNA (sfRNA) inactivates cellular exoribonuclease (XRN1) in the absence of Wolbachia, thereby giving stability to viral RNA. In the presence of Wolbachia, XRN1 remains inactivated and RNA degradation increases among all four DENV serotypes [66].

7. Lipid Droplet (LD) and Immunity

Lipid droplets (LDs) are structures composed of a fatty acid monolayer and a few exclusive structural proteins (Perilipin 1, 2, and 3) and are present in wide range of organisms. In mosquitoes, they are associated with lipid-storing cells like fat bodies that are crucial in mediating antiviral response. A balanced lipid environment is essential for the DENV to replicate inside mosquito cells. Thus, imbalance of lipids is a possible antiviral strategy. In a study, it was found that DENV infection induced transcription of LD biogenesis and lipid storage genes, which resulted in an increased LD level in the Aag2 cell line [67]. The classical innate immune pathways (Toll and IMD) that are activated during DENV infection were found to have a direct or indirect involvement in LD accumulation in the Aag2 cell line [68]. This indicates that LD might have an important role in mosquito immunity. On the other hand, in Wolbachia infected mosquito cells, cellular lipid components are used due to the lack of fatty acid synthesis genes [68]. Two Wolbachia strains, wMel and wMelPop, lower the level of lipidome components that are essential for DENV replication in an Ae. albopictus cell line (Aa23-T) [69]. Hence, both Wolbachia and the DENV compete for the cellular resources in co-infected cells, which significantly reduces DENV replication [63]. As LD plays dual roles (as an immune component and also as a cellular resource for the DENV), it may have a contradictory role in DENV infection in mosquitoes.
Immune gene activation: Wolbachia induces a reduction–oxidation (Redox) reaction in the mosquito to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). The oxidative stress activates the Toll pathway through which the antimicrobial peptides cecropin and defensin are produced [70]. Wolbachia also increases the expression of vago1 in Ae. aegypti, which acts as a ligand in the JAK-STAT pathway [71].
Role of Wolbachia in RNA interference: Wolbachia infection induces differential expression of host miRNAs, for example, miRNA aae-miR-2940. The aae-miR-2940 activates the metalloprotease gene, which is crucial for Wolbachia colonization [72]. Wolbachia infection downregulates AaDnmt2. AaDnmt2 is found to be overexpressed during DENV infection. So, downregulation of the AaDnmt2 during Wolbachia infection in Ae. aegypti might be a strategy by which Wolbachia counteracts the DENV [73].

8. Adaptive Immunity

Unlike vertebrates, the adaptive immunity of insects is poorly understood. In Anopheles gambiae, The Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam) is found to have characteristics similar to those of antibodies found in vertebrates [74]. Insects’ adaptive immunity against RNA viruses is provided by the RNAi mechanism. During viral infection, the viral dsRNA replicative intermediate is processed by dicer2 to generate siRNA which may pass to the neighboring cell providing adaptive immunity against the virus. The viral dsRNA replicative intermediate released from apoptotic cells is taken up by the neighboring cell, which also provides adaptive immunity [75]. Recently, many endogenous non-retroviral elements (ENE) were identified in the mosquito genome. These viral sequences are acquired from previous viral infection. Transposable elements (TE) are one of the master players of genomic variation and new sequence acquisition. Among different TEs, long terminal repeat (LTR) are found predominantly upstream and downstream of the ENE. These ENEs integrate into higher density LTR loci, such as piRNA clusters, and the ENE containing piRNA clusters produce more piRNAs [76]. The piRNA generated from the ENE piRNA clusters may interact with the specific viral RNA sequences to inhibit viral replication and accumulation in the host cell. Since the piRNA clusters are stably integrated into the mosquito germ line, this type of adaptive immunity is also passed to the next generation.

9. What is Next?

The DENV resides as a commensal in its vector, and the physiological effects due to viral propagation in mosquitoes are different from those in the human system.
Many signaling pathways that are active during the developmental stages of an insects are also involved in protecting insects against microbial attack. Activation of these signaling pathways results in expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that are up-regulated in virus-infected cells [24]. Generally, these AMPs target the bacterial outer membrane and cell wall biosynthesis. Viruses have significantly different structural components than bacteria, and thus the molecular mechanism of action of AMPs against the DENV needs further exploration. Similarly, small RNAs have been extensively studied, but it is still an open question as to exactly how these pathways are related to the evolutionarily conserved signaling pathways that are known to play a significant role against the DENV.
Recently, a group of researchers developed DENV-resistant mosquitoes by artificial activation of the JAK/STAT pathway [77]. These DENV resistant Ae. aegypti mosquitoes showed decreased capacity for egg production due to immune activation. Similar strategies of genetic engineering involving other immunity-related genes can be potentially useful methods to control the DENV [78].
Taken together, we are yet to understand the intricate details and complexity of the molecular basis of immune function of mosquitoes against the viruses that they carry. A better knowledge in this area might help open new possibilities with respect to the therapeutic intervention against mosquito-borne viral infections and vector control.

Author Contributions

D.M., S.D., F.B., and S.M. wrote the manuscript. U.R. wrote and edited the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frolova, E.I.; Fayzulin, R.Z.; Cook, S.H.; Griffin, D.E.; Rice, C.M.; Frolov, I. Roles of nonstructural protein nsP2 and alpha/beta interferons in determining the outcome of Sindbis Virus Infection. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 11254–11264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sim, S.; Dimopoulos, G. Dengue virus inhibits immune responses in Aedes aegypti Cells. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xi, Z.; Ramirez, J.L.; Dimopoulos, G. The Aedes aegypti Toll pathway controls dengue virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramirez, J.L.; Dimopoulos, G. The Toll immune signaling pathway control conserved anti-dengue defenses across diverse Ae. aegypti strains and against multiple dengue virus serotypes. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2010, 34, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Weber, A.N.; Tauszig-Delamasure, S.; Hoffmann, J.A.; Lelièvre, E.; Gascan, H.; Ray, K.P.; Morse, M.A.; Imler, J.; Gay, N.J. Binding of the Drosophila cytokine Spätzle to Toll is direct and establishes signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramirez, J.L.; Muturi, E.J.; Barletta, A.B.; Rooney, A.P. The Aedes aegypti IMD pathway is a critical component of the mosquito antifungal immune response. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2019, 95, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shin, S.W.; Kokoza, V.; Ahmed, A.; Raikhel, A.S. Characterization of three alternatively spliced isoforms of the Rel/NF- B transcription factor Relish from the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9978–9983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Georgel, P.; Naitza, S.; Kappler, C.; Ferrandon, D.; Zachary, D.; Swimmer, C.; Kopczynski, C.; Duyk, G.; Reichhart, J.M.; Hoffmann, J.A. Drosophila immune deficiency (IMD) is a death domain protein that activates antibacterial defense and can promote apoptosis. Dev. Cell 2001, 1, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paradkar, P.N.; Trinidad, L.; Voysey, R.; Duchemin, J.B.; Walker, P.J. Secreted Vago restricts West Nile virus infection in Culex mosquito cells by activating the Jak-STAT pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 18915–18920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Deddouche, S.; Matt, N.; Budd, A.; Mueller, S.; Kemp, C.; Galiana-Arnoux, D.; Dostert, C.; Antoniewski, C.; Hoffmann, J.A.; Imler, J.L. The DExD/H-boxhelicase Dicer-2 mediates the induction of antiviral activity in drosophila. Nat. Immunol 2008, 9, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luplertlop, N.; Surasombatpattana, P.; Patramool, S.; Dumas, E.; Wasinpiyamongkol, L.; Saune, L.; Hamel, R.; Bernard, E.; Sereno, D.; Thomas, F.; et al. Induction of a peptide with activity against a broad spectrum of pathogens in the Aedes aegypti salivary gland, following infection with dengue virus. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1001252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sim, S.; Jupatanakul, N.; Ramirez, J.L.; Kang, S.; Romero-Vivas, C.M.; Mohammed, H.; Dimopoulos, G. Transcriptomic profiling of diverse Aedes aegypti strains reveals increased basal-level immune activation in dengue virus-refractory populations and identifies novel virus-vector molecular interactions. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Silverman, N.; Zhou, R.; Erlich, R.L.; Hunter, M.; Bernstein, E.; Schneider, D.; Maniatis, T. Immune activation of NF-κB and JNK requires Drosophila TAK1. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 48928–48934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Choy, M.M.; Sessions, O.M.; Gubler, D.J.; Ooi, E.E. Production of infectious dengue virus in Aedes aegypti is dependent on the ubiquitin proteasome pathway. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Troupin, A.; Londono-Renteria, B.; Conway, M.J.; Cloherty, E.; Jameson, S.; Higgs, S.; Vanlandingham, D.L.; Fikrig, E.; Colpitts, T.M. A novel mosquito ubiquitin targets viral envelope protein for degradation and reduces virion production during dengue virus infection. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1860, 1898–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Souza-Neto, J.A.; Sim, S.; Dimopoulos, G. An evolutionary conserved function of the JAK-STAT pathway in anti-dengue defense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 17841–17846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kato, N.; Mueller, C.R.; Fuchs, J.F.; McElroy, K.; Wessely, V.; Higgs, S.; Christensen, B.M. Evaluation of the function of a type I peritrophic matrix as a physical barrier for midgut epithelium invasion by mosquito-borne pathogens in Aedes aegypti. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008, 8, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Houk, E.; Obie, F.; Hardy, J. Peritrophic membrane formation and the midgut barrier to arboviral infection in the mosquito, Culex tarsalis Coquillett (Insecta, Diptera). Acta Trop. 1979, 36, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  19. Beaty, B.J.; Bishop, D.H. Bunyavirus-vector interactions. Virus Res. 1988, 10, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Black, I.V.W.C.; Bennett, K.E.; Gorrochótegui-Escalante, N.; Barillas-Mury, C.V.; Fernández-Salas, I.; de Lourdes Muñoz, M.; Farfán-Alé, J.A.; Olson, K.E.; Beaty, B.J. Flavivirus Susceptibility in Aedes aegypti. Arch. Med. Res. 2002, 33, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sánchez-Vargas, I.; Scott, J.C.; Poole-Smith, B.K.; Franz, A.W.E.; Barbosa-Solomieu, V.; Wilusz, J.; Olson, K.E.; Blair, C.D. Dengue virus type 2 infections of Aedes aegypti are modulated by the mosquito’s RNA interference pathway. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ramos-Castañeda, J.; González, C.; Jiménez, M.A.; Duran, J.; Hernández-Martínez, S.; Rodríguez, M.H.; Lanz-Mendoza, H. Effect of nitric oxide on dengue virus replication in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles albimanus. Intervirology 2008, 51, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cheng, G.; Liu, L.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.O.; Colpitts, T.M.; Feitosa, F.; Anderson, J.F.; Fikrig, E. An in vivo transfection approach elucidates a role for Aedes aegypti thioester-containing proteins in flaviviral infection. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xiao, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Pang, X.; Wang, P.; Cheng, G. Complement-related proteins control the flavivirus infection of Aedes aegypti by inducing antimicrobial peptides. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kramer, L.D.; Hardy, J.L.; Presser, S.B.; Houk, E.J. Dissemination barriers for western equine encephalomyelitis virus in Culex tarsalis infected after ingestion of low viral doses. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1981, 30, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Romoser, W.S.; Turell, M.J.; Lerdthusnee, K.; Neira, M.; Dohm, D.; Luldwig, G.; Wasieloski, L. Pathogenesis of Rift Valley fever virus in mosquitoes-tracheal conduits and the basal lamina as an extra-cellular barrier. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 2005, 19, 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  27. Grimstad, P.R.; Paulson, S.L.; Craig, G.B., Jr. Vector competence of Aedes hendersoni (Diptera: Culicidae) for La Crosse virus and evidence of a salivary-gland escape barrier. J. Med. Entomol. 1985, 22, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sim, S.; Ramirez, J.L.; Dimopoulos, G. Dengue virus infection of the Aedes aegypti salivary gland and chemosensory apparatus induces genes that modulate infection and blood-feeding behavior. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hoshino, M.; Matsuzaki, F.; Nabeshima, Y.-I.; Hama, C. hikaru genki, a CNS-specific gene identified by abnormal locomotion in Drosophila, encodes a novel type of protein. Neuron 1993, 10, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Christophides, G.K.; Zdobnov, E.; Barillas-Mury, C.; Birney, E.; Blandin, S.; Blass, C.; Brey, P.T.; Collins, F.H.; Danielli, A.; Dimopoulos, G.; et al. Immunity-related genes and gene families in Anopheles gambiae. Science 2002, 298, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Matsuyama, K.; Natori, S. Purification of three antibacterial proteins from the culture medium of NIH-Sape-4, an embryonic cell line of Sarcophaga peregrina. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 17112–17116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Wimley, W.C.; Selsted, M.E.; White, S.H. Interactions between human defensins and lipid bilayers: Evidence for formation of multimeric pores. Protein Sci. 1994, 3, 1362–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Moore, A.J.; Beazley, W.D.; Bibby, M.C.; Devine, D.A. Antimicrobial activity of cecropins. J. Antimicrobiol. Chemother. 1996, 37, 1077–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Liu, X.; Guo, C.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y. Inhibition of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by Cecropin D in vitro. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 34, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guo, C.; Huang, Y.; Cong, P.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; He, Z. Cecropin P1 inhibits porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by blocking attachment. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, Z.; Kingsolver, M.B.; Avadhanula, V.; Hardy, R.W. An antiviral role for antimicrobial peptides during the arthropod response to Alphavirus replication. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 4272–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gaines, P.J.; Olson, K.E.; Higgs, S.; Powers, A.M.; Beaty, B.J.; Blair, C.D. Pathogen-derived resistance to dengue type 2 virus in mosquito cells by expression of the premembrane coding region of the viral genome. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 2132–2137. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Caplen, N.J.; Zheng, Z.; Falgout, B.; Morgan, R.A. Inhibition of viral gene expression and replication in mosquito cells by dsRNA-triggered RNA interference. Mol. Ther. 2002, 6, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Adelman, Z.N.; Blair, C.D.; Carlson, J.O.; Beaty, B.J.; Olson, K.E. Sindbis virus-induced silencing of dengue viruses in mosquitoes. Insect Mol. Biol. 2001, 10, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hess, A.M.; Prasad, A.N.; Ptitsyn, A.; Ebel, G.D.; Olson, K.E.; Barbacioru, C.; Monighetti, C.; Campbell, C.L. Small RNA profiling of Dengue virus-mosquito interactions implicates the PIWI RNA pathway in anti-viral defense. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wu, X.; Hong, H.; Yue, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, X.; Jiang, L.; Li, L.; Li, Q.; Gao, G.; Yang, X. Inhibitory effect of small interfering RNA on dengue virus replication in mosquito cells. Virol. J. 2010, 7, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wu, Q.; Luo, Y.; Lu, R.; Lau, N.; Lai, E.C.; Li, W.-X.; Ding, S.W. Virus discovery by deep sequencing and assembly of virus-derived small silencing RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1606–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Trobaugh, D.W.; Klimstra, W.B. MicroRNA Regulation of RNA virus replication and pathogenesis. Trends Mol. Med. 2017, 23, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hussain, M.; Walker, T.; Oneill, S.L.; Asgari, S. Blood meal induced microRNA regulates development and immune associated genes in the Dengue mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 43, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, J.; Zheng, P.; Li, Y.; Zheng, X.; Puthiyakunnon, S.; Tu, Z.; Chen, X.G. The expression profile of Aedes albopictus miRNAs is altered by dengue virus serotype-2 infection. Cell Biosci. 2015, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Avila-Bonilla, R.G.; Yocupicio-Monroy, M.; Marchat, L.A.; Nova-Ocampo, M.A.D.; Ángel, R.M.D.; Salas-Benito, J.S. Analysis of the miRNA profile in C6/36 cells persistently infected with dengue virus type 2. Virus Res. 2017, 232, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hussain, M.; Asgari, S. MicroRNA-like viral small RNA from Dengue virus 2 autoregulates its replication in mosquito cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 2746–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yen, P.-S.; James, A.; Li, J.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Failloux, A.-B. Synthetic miRNAs induce dual arboviral-resistance phenotypes in the vector mosquito Aedes aegypti. Commun. Biol. 2018, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vagin, V.V.; Sigova, A.; Li, C.; Seitz, H.; Gvozdev, V.; Zamore, P.D. A distinct small RNA pathway silences selfish genetic elements in the germline. Science 2006, 313, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ipsaro, J.J.; Haase, A.D.; Knott, S.R.; Joshua-Tor, L.; Hannon, G.J. The structural biochemistry of Zucchini implicates it as a nuclease in piRNA biogenesis. Nature 2012, 491, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kawaoka, S.; Izumi, N.; Katsuma, S.; Tomari, Y. 3′ end formation of PIWI-interacting RNAs in vitro. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 1015–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Saito, K.; Sakaguchi, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, T.; Siomi, H.; Siomi, M.C. Pimet, the Drosophila homolog of HEN1, mediates 2′-O-methylation of PIWI- interacting RNAs at their 3′ ends. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1603–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, C.; Vagin, V.V.; Lee, S.; Xu, J.; Ma, S.; Xi, H.; Seitz, H.; Horwich, M.D.; Syrzycka, M.; Honda, B.M.; et al. Collapse of germline piRNAs in the absence of Argonaute3 reveals somatic piRNAs in flies. Cell 2009, 137, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Homolka, D.; Pandey, R.R.; Goriaux, C.; Brasset, E.; Vaury, C.; Sachidanandam, R.; Fauvarque, M.O.; Pillai, R.S. PIWI slicing and RNA elements in precursors instruct directional primary piRNA biogenesis. Cell Rep. 2015, 12, 418–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Scott, J.C.; Brackney, D.E.; Campbell, C.L.; Bondu-Hawkins, V.; Hjelle, B.; Ebel, G.D.; Oslon, K.E.; Blair, C.D. Comparison of dengue virus type 2-specific small RNAs from RNA interference-competent and incompetent mosquito cells. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miesen, P.; Ivens, A.; Buck, A.H.; Rij, R.P.V. Small RNA profiling in dengue virus 2-infected Aedes mosquito cells reveals viral piRNAs and novel host miRNAs. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, Y.; Jin, B.; Liu, P.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Gu, J. piRNA profiling of dengue virus type 2-infected Asian tiger mosquito and midgut tissues. Viruses 2018, 10, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Palatini, U.; Miesen, P.; Carballar-Lejarazu, R.; Ometto, L.; Rizzo, E.; Tu, Z.; van Rij, R.P.; Bonizzoni, M. Comparative genomics shows that viral integrations are abundant and express piRNAs in the arboviral vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ramirez, J.L.; Souza-Neto, J.; Torres Cosme, R.; Rovira, J.; Ortiz, A.; Pascale, J.M.; Dimopoulos, G. Reciprocal tripartite interactions between the Aedes aegypti midgut microbiota, innate immune system and dengue virus influences vector competence. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ramirez, J.L.; Short, S.M.; Bahia, A.C.; Saraiva, R.G.; Dong, Y.; Kang, S.; Tripathi, A.; Mlambo, G.; Dimopoulos, G. Chromobacterium Csp_P reduces malaria and dengue infection in vector mosquitoes and has entomopathogenic and in vitro anti-pathogen activities. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Angleró-Rodríguez, Y.I.; Talyuli, O.A.; Blumberg, B.J.; Kang, S.; Demby, C.; Shields, A.; Carlson, J.; Jupatanakul, N.; Dimopoulos, G. An Aedes aegypti-associated fungus increases susceptibility to dengue virus by modulating gut trypsin activity. Elife 2017, 6, e28844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bian, G.; Xu, Y.; Lu, P.; Xie, Y.; Xi, Z. The endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia induces resistance to dengue virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mousson, L.; Zouache, K.; Arias-Goeta, C.; Raquin, V.; Mavingui, P.; Failloux, A.-B. The native Wolbachia symbionts limit transmission of dengue virus in Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ferguson, N.M.; Kien, D.T.H.; Clapham, H.; Aguas, R.; Trung, V.T.; Chau, T.N.; Popovici, J.; Ryan, P.A.; O’Neill, S.L.; McGraw, E.A.; et al. Modeling the impact on virus transmission of Wolbachia-mediated blocking of dengue virus infection of Aedes aegypti. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Walker, T.; Johnson, P.H.; Moreira, L.A.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Frentiu, F.D.; McMeniman, C.J.; Leong, Y.S.; Dong, Y.; Axford, J.; Kriesner, P.; et al. The wMel Wolbachia strain blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations. Nat. Lett. 2011, 476, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thomas, S.; Verma, J.; Woolfit, M.; O’Neill, S.L. Wolbachia-mediated virus blocking in mosquito cells is dependent on XRN1-mediated viral RNA degradation and influenced by viral replication rate. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Barletta, A.B.; Alves, L.R.; Silva, M.C.; Sim, S.; Dimopoulos, G.; Liechocki, S.; Maya-Monteiro, C.M.; Sorgine, M.H. Emerging role of lipid droplets in Aedes aegypti immune response against bacteria and Dengue virus. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wu, M.; Sun, L.V.; Vamathevan, J.; Riegler, M.; Deboy, R.; Brownlie, J.C.; McGraw, E.A.; Martin, W.; Esser, C.; Ahmadinejad, N.; et al. Phylogenomics of the reproductive parasite Wolbachia pipientis wMel: A streamlined genome overrun by mobile genetic elements. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, E69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Molloy, J.C.; Sommer, U.; Viant, M.R.; Sinkins, S.P. Wolbachia modulates lipid metabolism in Aedes albopictus mosquito cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 3109–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pan, X.; Zhou, G.; Wu, J.; Bian, G.; Lu, P.; Raikhel, A.S.; Xi, Z. Wolbachia induces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent activation of the Toll pathway to control dengue virus in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 109, E23–E31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Asad, S.; Parry, R.; Asgari, S. Upregulation of Aedes aegypti Vago1 by Wolbachia and its effect on dengue virus replication. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 92, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hussaina, M.; Frentiua, F.D.; Moreiraa, L.A.; O’Neilla, S.L.; Asgari, S. Wolbachia uses host microRNAs to manipulate host gene expression and facilitate colonization of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 9250–9255. [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhang, R.; Zhu, Y.; Pang, X.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, R.; Cheng, G. Regulation of antimicrobial peptides in Aedes aegypti Aag2 cells. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dong, Y.; Taylor, H.E.; Dimopoulos, G. AgDscam, a hypervariable immunoglobulin domain-containing receptor of the Anopheles gambiae innate immune system. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, e229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Saleh, M.-C.; Tassetto, M.; Rij, R.P.V.; Goic, B.; Gausson, V.; Berry, B.; Jacquier, C.; Antoniewski, C.; Andino, R. Antiviral immunity in Drosophila requires systemic RNA interference spread. Nature 2009, 458, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Whitfield, Z.J.; Dolan, P.T.; Kunitomi, M.; Tassetto, M.; Seetin, M.G.; Oh, S.; Heiner, C.; Paxinos, E.; Andino, R. The diversity, structure, and function of heritable adaptive immunity sequences in the Aedes aegypti genome. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 3511–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jupatanakul, N.; Sim, S.; Angleró-Rodríguez, Y.I.; Souza-Neto, J.; Das, S.; Poti, K.E.; Rossi, S.L.; Bergren, N.; Vasilakis, N.; Dimopuolos, G. Engineered Aedes aegypti JAK/STAT pathway-mediated immunity to dengue virus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Fang, J. Ecology: A world without mosquitoes. Nature 2010, 466, 432–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Pathogens 08 00077 g001 550
Figure 1. Mosquito immune strategies against the dengue virus (DENV). JAK-STAT = Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription; AaSR-C = Ae. aegypti homolog of scavenger receptor-C; AsMCR = Ae. aegypti macroglobulin complement related factor.
Figure 1. Mosquito immune strategies against the dengue virus (DENV). JAK-STAT = Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription; AaSR-C = Ae. aegypti homolog of scavenger receptor-C; AsMCR = Ae. aegypti macroglobulin complement related factor.
Pathogens 08 00077 g001
Pathogens 08 00077 g002 550
Figure 2. Evolutionarily conserved signaling pathways. Toll pathway: The virus is recognized by an unknown cytoplasmic receptor. Cytokine pro-spleatzle is cleaved to active cytokine spleatzle and binds to the Toll receptor. Adaptor proteins are recruited to the Toll receptor. A negative regulator of cactus degrades and a free Rel1 dimer translocates to the nucleus. The Rel1 dimer acts as a transcription factor for Toll regulated genes and produces antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (cecropin and defensin). IMD pathway: The virus binds to a transmembrane receptor of the cell and splits the pathway into two segments. One segment activates the JNK pathway and phosphorylates Rel2. Another segment recruits IMD and other adaptor proteins {Immune deficiency (IMD), fas-associated death domain (FADD) and death related ced-3/Nedd2-like protein (DREDD)} to cleave the C-terminal phosphorylated domain of Rel2.11. Cleaved Rel2 translocates to the nucleus and transcribes AMPs and a secretory protein, Vago. JAK/STAT pathway: This pathway is activated either by cytokine-like secretory protein from an infected cell or by the conserved JAK-STAT ligand Upd. Vago is secreted from nearby infected cells, binds to an unknown receptor, and recruits hopscotch (HOP) kinase. Similarly, Dome receptors bind Upd and receptor phosphorylation occurs through HOP kinase. The phosphorylated receptor is a docking site for STAT. STAT phosphorylation leads to dimerization. STAT dimer translocates to the nucleus and transcribes JAK/STAT-regulated genes and dengue virus restriction factor (DVRF).
Figure 2. Evolutionarily conserved signaling pathways. Toll pathway: The virus is recognized by an unknown cytoplasmic receptor. Cytokine pro-spleatzle is cleaved to active cytokine spleatzle and binds to the Toll receptor. Adaptor proteins are recruited to the Toll receptor. A negative regulator of cactus degrades and a free Rel1 dimer translocates to the nucleus. The Rel1 dimer acts as a transcription factor for Toll regulated genes and produces antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (cecropin and defensin). IMD pathway: The virus binds to a transmembrane receptor of the cell and splits the pathway into two segments. One segment activates the JNK pathway and phosphorylates Rel2. Another segment recruits IMD and other adaptor proteins {Immune deficiency (IMD), fas-associated death domain (FADD) and death related ced-3/Nedd2-like protein (DREDD)} to cleave the C-terminal phosphorylated domain of Rel2.11. Cleaved Rel2 translocates to the nucleus and transcribes AMPs and a secretory protein, Vago. JAK/STAT pathway: This pathway is activated either by cytokine-like secretory protein from an infected cell or by the conserved JAK-STAT ligand Upd. Vago is secreted from nearby infected cells, binds to an unknown receptor, and recruits hopscotch (HOP) kinase. Similarly, Dome receptors bind Upd and receptor phosphorylation occurs through HOP kinase. The phosphorylated receptor is a docking site for STAT. STAT phosphorylation leads to dimerization. STAT dimer translocates to the nucleus and transcribes JAK/STAT-regulated genes and dengue virus restriction factor (DVRF).
Pathogens 08 00077 g002
Pathogens 08 00077 g003 550
Figure 3. Organ-specific mosquito antiviral strategies. (A): In the Ae. aegypti system, DENV enters through blood meal and replicates inside the mid-gut. From the mid-gut, DENV is released to the hemolymph, salivary glands, and brain. (B): Inside the mid-gut epithelial cells, (1) RNA interference limits viral replication and (2) immune signaling pathways generate AMPs that block the virus inside the cells and also diffuse out to the hemolymph. (C): In the hemocytes, (3) complement-like factor AaMCR and its scavenger receptor AaSR-C interact with the signaling AMP production. (4) Phenoloxidase (PO) encapsulates DENV in the hemolymph. (D): In the neurons, AaHig binds to the envelop protein of the DENV as well as the cell membrane to block endocytosis. (E): In the salivary glands (5) extracellular cecropin-like peptides inhibit the virus and (6) intracellular cystatin and ankyrin repeat-containing protein (ARP) limit virus production.
Figure 3. Organ-specific mosquito antiviral strategies. (A): In the Ae. aegypti system, DENV enters through blood meal and replicates inside the mid-gut. From the mid-gut, DENV is released to the hemolymph, salivary glands, and brain. (B): Inside the mid-gut epithelial cells, (1) RNA interference limits viral replication and (2) immune signaling pathways generate AMPs that block the virus inside the cells and also diffuse out to the hemolymph. (C): In the hemocytes, (3) complement-like factor AaMCR and its scavenger receptor AaSR-C interact with the signaling AMP production. (4) Phenoloxidase (PO) encapsulates DENV in the hemolymph. (D): In the neurons, AaHig binds to the envelop protein of the DENV as well as the cell membrane to block endocytosis. (E): In the salivary glands (5) extracellular cecropin-like peptides inhibit the virus and (6) intracellular cystatin and ankyrin repeat-containing protein (ARP) limit virus production.
Pathogens 08 00077 g003
Pathogens 08 00077 g004 550
Figure 4. siRNA mediated pathway. (1) The exogenous siRNA pathway is activated when the virus-derived dsRNA is recognized and cleaved by the Dcr2 and r2d2 complex into about 19-21 bp long siRNA. siRNAs duplexes are loaded onto the RISC (RNA induced silencing complex), which degrades the passenger strand (2). The RNAi signal or the siRNA from the virus-infected cell enters the neighboring uninfected cell through a gap junction or cytoplasmic bridge (3). Viral dsRNA released from the infected ruptured cell is taken up by the cells, which provides adaptive immunity by the siRNA pathway.
Figure 4. siRNA mediated pathway. (1) The exogenous siRNA pathway is activated when the virus-derived dsRNA is recognized and cleaved by the Dcr2 and r2d2 complex into about 19-21 bp long siRNA. siRNAs duplexes are loaded onto the RISC (RNA induced silencing complex), which degrades the passenger strand (2). The RNAi signal or the siRNA from the virus-infected cell enters the neighboring uninfected cell through a gap junction or cytoplasmic bridge (3). Viral dsRNA released from the infected ruptured cell is taken up by the cells, which provides adaptive immunity by the siRNA pathway.
Pathogens 08 00077 g004
Pathogens 08 00077 g005 550
Figure 5. The miRNA pathway mediated inhibition of viral replication. Primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) are transcribed (1) from the host genome, which is cleaved (2) by the nuclear resident Drosha into approximately 70 bp-long precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs), which then are transported (3) to the cytoplasm, where they get further cleaved (4) by Dicer into mature 21-23 bp-long miRNA. On the other hand, the viral RNA, which forms hairpin secondary structures, is also cleaved (5) by the Dicer to generate microRNA-like viral small RNA, which are further loaded (6) into RISC. RISC complex blocks (7) the viral replication directly by interacting with the single stranded viral RNAs. Viral infection also influences production of host immune transcripts and other cellular transcripts (8). Translation of these transcripts is also modulated (9) by the host miRNAs or microRNA-like viral small RNAs. This results in up-regulation or down-regulation of the immune molecules (10) and other host cellular proteins (11), which may positively or negatively regulate viral replication in the host cell.
Figure 5. The miRNA pathway mediated inhibition of viral replication. Primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) are transcribed (1) from the host genome, which is cleaved (2) by the nuclear resident Drosha into approximately 70 bp-long precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs), which then are transported (3) to the cytoplasm, where they get further cleaved (4) by Dicer into mature 21-23 bp-long miRNA. On the other hand, the viral RNA, which forms hairpin secondary structures, is also cleaved (5) by the Dicer to generate microRNA-like viral small RNA, which are further loaded (6) into RISC. RISC complex blocks (7) the viral replication directly by interacting with the single stranded viral RNAs. Viral infection also influences production of host immune transcripts and other cellular transcripts (8). Translation of these transcripts is also modulated (9) by the host miRNAs or microRNA-like viral small RNAs. This results in up-regulation or down-regulation of the immune molecules (10) and other host cellular proteins (11), which may positively or negatively regulate viral replication in the host cell.
Pathogens 08 00077 g005
Pathogens 08 00077 g006 550
Figure 6. The piRNA mechanism. During viral infection, the ss viral RNA is processed by PIWI proteins [56] (1), PIWI5 and PIWI6, to form the primary piRNA. This primary piRNA may undergo a ping-pong amplification loop (2) to produce Ago3-dependent secondary piRNA. Additionally, viral RNA is also reverse transcribed to form viral DNA (vDNA) (3). These vDNA derived transcripts serve as additional precursors for the viral piRNA production (4,5). Genomic integration of vDNA might occur. (6) Integration in the germline leads to formation of endogenous nonretroviral element.
Figure 6. The piRNA mechanism. During viral infection, the ss viral RNA is processed by PIWI proteins [56] (1), PIWI5 and PIWI6, to form the primary piRNA. This primary piRNA may undergo a ping-pong amplification loop (2) to produce Ago3-dependent secondary piRNA. Additionally, viral RNA is also reverse transcribed to form viral DNA (vDNA) (3). These vDNA derived transcripts serve as additional precursors for the viral piRNA production (4,5). Genomic integration of vDNA might occur. (6) Integration in the germline leads to formation of endogenous nonretroviral element.
Pathogens 08 00077 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mukherjee, D.; Das, S.; Begum, F.; Mal, S.; Ray, U. The Mosquito Immune System and the Life of Dengue Virus: What We Know and Do Not Know. Pathogens 2019, 8, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8020077

AMA Style

Mukherjee D, Das S, Begum F, Mal S, Ray U. The Mosquito Immune System and the Life of Dengue Virus: What We Know and Do Not Know. Pathogens. 2019; 8(2):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8020077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mukherjee, Debica, Sandeepan Das, Feroza Begum, Sweety Mal, and Upasana Ray. 2019. "The Mosquito Immune System and the Life of Dengue Virus: What We Know and Do Not Know" Pathogens 8, no. 2: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8020077

APA Style

Mukherjee, D., Das, S., Begum, F., Mal, S., & Ray, U. (2019). The Mosquito Immune System and the Life of Dengue Virus: What We Know and Do Not Know. Pathogens, 8(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8020077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop