Occurrence and Characterization of Salmonella Isolated from Table Egg Layer Farming Environments in Western Australia and Insights into Biosecurity and Egg Handling Practices
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. The Occurrence of Salmonella in the Layer Farm Environments
2.2. Diversity of Salmonella Serovars and Sequence Types
2.3. Production Management, Biosecurity, and Egg Handling Practices
3. Discussion
3.1. The First Insight on the Status of Salmonella in Egg Businesses in WA
3.2. Salmonella Recovery from Environmental Samples
3.3. Diversity of Salmonella Subtypes Recovered from Environmental Samples
3.4. Biosecurity and Production Practices—Points of Attention
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Recruitment of Egg Businesses
4.2. Environmental Sampling
4.3. Isolation, Identification, and Serotyping of Salmonella
4.4. MLST of S. Typhimurium Isolates
4.5. Biosecurity and Production Practices Questionnaire
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Moffatt, C.R.; Musto, J.; Pingault, N.; Miller, M.; Stafford, R.; Gregory, J.; Polkinghorne, B.G.; Kirk, M.D. Salmonella Typhimurium and Outbreaks of Egg-Associated Disease in Australia, 2001 to 2011. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2016, 13, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Craig, A.T.; Musto, J.A.; Carroll, T.F.; Roberts-Witteveen, A.R.; McCarthy, R.A.; Wang, Q. An investigation of Salmonella Typhimurium linked to contaminated eggs on the Central Coast of NSW, 2008. NSW Public Health Bull. 2013, 24, 99–101. [Google Scholar]
- Moffatt, C.R.; Appuhamy, R.; Kaye, A.; Carswell, A.; Denehy, D. An outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium phage type 135a gastroenteritis linked to eggs served at an Australian Capital Territory café. Commun. Dis. Intell. Q. Rep. 2012, 36, E281–E285. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Chousalkar, K.; Gole, V.; Caraguel, C.; Rault, J.L. Chasing Salmonella Typhimurium in free-range egg production system. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 192, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AECL. Australian Egg Corporation Limited Annual Report; Australian Egg Corporation: North Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2015; Available online: https://www.australianeggs.org.au/who-we-are/annual-reports/ (accessed on 17 February 2019).
- Scott, A.B.; Singh, M.; Toribio, J.A.; Hernandez-Jover, M.; Barnes, B.; Glass, K.; Moloney, B.; Lee, A.; Groves, P. Comparisons of management practices and farm design on Australian commercial layer and meat chicken farms: Cage, barn and free range. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lay, D.C., Jr.; Fulton, R.M.; Hester, P.Y.; Karcher, D.M.; Kjaer, J.B.; Mench, J.A.; Mullens, B.A.; Newberry, R.C.; Nicol, C.J.; O’Sullivan, N.P.; et al. Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 278–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daigle, C.; Siegford, J. Welfare Quality® parameters do not always reflect hen behaviour across the lay cycle in non-cage laying hens. Anim. Welf. 2014, 23, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gole, V.C.; Woodhouse, R.; Caraguel, C.; Moyle, T.; Rault, J.L.; Sexton, M.; Chousalkar, K. Dynamics of Salmonella Shedding and Welfare of Hens in Free-Range Egg Production Systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e03313–e03316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- OzFoodNet Working Group. Foodborne Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Investigations in Western Australia, Fourth Quarter 2017; OzFoodNet, Communicable Disease Control Directorate: Perth, WA, Australia, 2017; Available online: https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/~/media/Files/Corporate/general%20documents/Infectious%20diseases/Word/OzFoodNet/WA-OzFoodnet-annual-report-2017.docx (accessed on 17 February 2019).
- Watman, D.; Gast, R.; Mallison, E. Salmonellosis. In A Laboratory Manual for the Insolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens, 5th ed.; American Association of Avian Pathologist: Jacksonville, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar]
- Cuttell, L.; Groves, M.; Wilson, A. 2014 Microbiological Baseline Survey of the Queensland egg Production Environment; Safe Food Production Queensland: Greenslopes, QLD, Australia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- NSW Food Authority. Baseline Evaluation of the NSW Food Safety Scheme: Microbiological Survey of egg Farms in NSW; NSW Food Authority: Silverwater, NSW, Australia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kingsbury, J.; Soboleva, T. Microbiological Survey of Commercial Egg Layer Farms in New Zealand for the Presence of Salmonella; New Zealand Food Safety Discussion Paper No: 2019/02; New Zealand Food Safety: Auckland, New Zealand, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Im, M.C.; Jeong, S.J.; Kwon, Y.K.; Jeong, O.M.; Kang, M.S.; Lee, Y.J. Prevalence and characteristics of Salmonella spp. isolated from commercial layer farms in Korea. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 1691–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soria, M.C.; Soria, M.A.; Bueno, D.J.; Godano, E.I.; Gomez, S.C.; ViaButron, I.A.; Padin, V.M.; Rogé, A.D. Salmonella spp. contamination in commercial layer hen farms using different types of samples and detection methods. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 2820–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andoh, L.A.; Dalsgaardm, A.; Obiri-Danso, K.; Newman, M.J.; Barco, L.; Olsen, J.E. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars isolated from poultry in Ghana. Epidemiol. Infect. 2016, 144, 3288–3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jardine, A.; Ressler, K.A.; Botham, S.; Irwin, M.J.; Shadbolt, C.; Vally, H.; Ferson, M.J. An outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium 108/ 170 at a privately catered barbeque at a Sydney sports club. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 1215–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moffatt, C.R.; Musto, J. Salmonella and egg-related outbreaks. Microbiol Aust. 2013, 34, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Hoorebeke, S.; Van Immerseel, F.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R.; Dewulf, J. The influence of the housing system on Salmonella infections in laying hens: A review. Zoonoses Public Health 2011, 58, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hulaj, B.; Cabeli, P.; Goga, I.; Taylor, N.; Hess, C.; Hess, M.L. Survey of the prevalence of Salmonella species on laying hen farms in Kosovo. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2030–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van de Giessen, A.W.; Ament, A.J.; Notermans, S.H. Intervention strategies for Salmonella enteritidis in poultry flocks: A basic approach. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1994, 21, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gradel, K.O.; Sayers, A.R.; Davies, R.H. Surface disinfection tests with Salmonella and a putative indicator bacterium, mimicking worst-case scenarios in poultry houses. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 1636–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrique-Mas, J.J.; Marin, C.; Breslin, M.; McLaren, I.; Davies, R. A comparison of the efficacy of cleaning and disinfection methods in eliminating Salmonella spp. from commercial egg laying houses. Avian Pathol. 2009, 38, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barua, H.; Biswas, P.K.; Olsen, K.E.; Christensen, J.P. Prevalence and characterization of motile Salmonella in commercial layer poultry farms in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rivas, L. A microbiological Survey of Processed Animal feeds—A Pilot Study; Institute of Environmental Science and Research: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Barbour, E.K.; Nabbut, N.H.; Hinners, S.W. Distribution of paratyphoids on Saudi Arabian poultry farms and pathogenicity studies of predominant serotypes. Avian Dis. 1983, 27, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulou, C.; Carrique-Mas, J.J.; Davies, R.H.; Sayers, A.R. Retrospective analysis of Salmonella isolates recovered from animal feed in Great Britain. Vet. Rec. 2009, 165, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cox, N.A.; Berrang, M.E.; Cason, J.A. Salmonella penetration of egg shells and proliferation in broiler hatching eggs—A review. Poult. Sci. 2000, 79, 1571–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pande, V.V.; Gole, V.C.; McWhorter, A.R.; Abraham, S.; Chousalkar, K.K. Antimicrobial resistance of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates from egg layer flocks and egg shells. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 203, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chousalkar, K.K.; Roberts, J.R. Recovery of Salmonella from eggshell wash, eggshell crush, and egg internal contents of unwashed commercial shell eggs in Australia. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 1739–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ford, L.; Moffatt, C.; Fearnley, E.; Miller, M.; Gregory, J.; Sloan-Gardner, T.; Polkinghorne, B.G.; Bell, R.; Franklin, N.; Williamson, D.A. The Epidemiology of Salmonella enterica Outbreaks in Australia, 2001–2016. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2018, 2, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eurosurveillance Editorial Team. The 2013 joint ECDC/EFSA report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks published. Euro Surveill. 2015, 20, 21021. [Google Scholar]
- Kingsley, R.A.; Msefula, C.L.; Thomson, N.R.; Kariuki, S.; Holt, K.E.; Gordon, M.A.; Harris, D.; Clarke, L.; Whitehead, S.; Sangal, V.; et al. Epidemic multiple drug resistant Salmonella Typhimurium causing invasive disease in sub-Saharan Africa have a distinct genotype. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 2279–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Okoro, C.K.; Kingsley, R.A.; Connor, T.R.; Harris, S.R.; Parry, C.M.; Al-Mashhadani, M.N.; Kariuki, S.; Msefula, C.L.; Gordon, M.A.; de Pina, E.; et al. Intracontinental spread of human invasive Salmonella Typhimurium pathovariants in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Barrila, J.; Roland, K.L.; Kilbourne, J.; Ott, C.M.; Forsyth, R.J.; Nickerson, C.A. Characterization of the invasive, multidrug resistant non-typhoidal salmonella strain D23580 in a murine model of infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Harb, A.; Habib, I.; Mezal, E.H.; Kareem, H.S.; Laird, T.; O’Dea, M.; Abraham, S. Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and whole-genome sequencing analysis of Salmonella isolates from chicken carcasses imported into Iraq from four different countries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 284, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panzenhagen, P.H.N.; Paul, N.C.; Junior, C.A.C.; Costa, R.G.; Rodrigues, D.P.; Shah, D.H. Genetically distinct lineages of Salmonella Typhimurium ST313 and ST19 are present in Brazil. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 308, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Hoorebeke, S.; Van Immerseel, F.; Schulz, J.; Hartung, J.; Harisberger, M.; Barco, L.; Ricci, A.; Theodoropoulos, G.; Xylouri, E.; De Vylder, J.; et al. Determination of the within and between flock prevalence and identification of risk factors for Salmonella infections in laying hen flocks housed in conventional and alternative systems. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 94, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Featherstone, C.A.; Reichel, R.; Snow, L.C.; Davies, R.H.; Christiansen, K.H.; Carrique-Mas, J.J.; Evans, S.J. Investigation of risk factors for Salmonella on fattening-turkey farms. Epidemiol. Infect. 2010, 138, 1427–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Racicot, M.; Venne, D.; Durivage, A.; Vaillancourt, J.P. Evaluation of strategies to enhance biosecurity compliance on poultry farms in Québec: Effect of audits and cameras. Prev. Vet. Med. 2012, 103, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joint-New South Wales/Victoria Salmonella Enteritidis Monitoring & Accreditation Program Guidelines; New South Wales Department of Primary Industries: Orange, NSW, Australia, 2018. Available online: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/722081/NSEMAPGuidelines.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2019).
- Davies, R.H.; Wray, C. Persistence of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry units and poultry food. Br. Poult. Sci. 1996, 37, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adesiyun, A.; Webb, L.; Musai, L.; Louison, B.; Joseph, G.; Stewart-Johnson, A.; Samlal, S.; Rodrigo, S. Survey of Salmonella contamination in chicken layer farms in three Caribbean countries. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 1471–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lapuz, R.R.; Umali, D.V.; Suzuki, T.; Shirota, K.; Katoh, H. Comparison of the prevalence of Salmonella infection in layer hens from commercial layer farms with high and low rodent densities. Avian Dis. 2012, 56, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wales, A.; Breslin, M.; Carter, B.; Sayers, R.; Davies, R. A longitudinal study of environmental Salmonella contamination in caged and free-range layer flocks. Avian Pathol. 2007, 36, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umali, D.V.; Lapuz, R.R.; Suzuki, T.; Shirota, K.; Katoh, H. Transmission and shedding patterns of Salmonella in naturally infected captive wild roof rats (Rattus rattus) from a Salmonella-contaminated layer farm. Avian Dis. 2012, 56, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trampel, D.W.; Holder, T.G.; Gast, R.K. Integrated farm management to prevent Salmonella Enteritidis contamination of eggs. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2014, 23, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AECL. Code of Practice for Shell Egg, Production, Grading, Packing, and Distribution; AECL: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2010. Available online: https://www.australianeggs.org.au/dmsdocument/815-code-of-practice-for-shell-egg-production-grading-packing-and-distribution-2009-pdf (accessed on 15 April 2019).
- Lublin, A.; Maler, I.; Mechani, S.; Pinto, R.; Sela-Saldinger, S. Survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis on and within stored table eggs. J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dewaele, I.; Van Meirhaeghe, H.; Rasschaert, G.; Vanrobaeys, M.; De Graef, E.; Herman, L.; Ducatelle, R.; Heyndrickx, M.; De Reu, K. Persistent Salmonella Enteritidis environmental contamination on layer farms in the context of an implemented national control program with obligatory vaccination. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rivas, L.; King, N.; Lake, R. Risk Profile (Update): Salmonella (Non Typhoidal) in and on Eggs; Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd.: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Desin, T.S.; Koster, W.; Potter, A.A. Salmonella vaccines in poultry: Past, present and future. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2013, 12, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sasaki, Y.; Murakami, M.; Maruyama, N.; Tsujiyama, Y.; Kusukawa, M.; Asai, T.; Yamada, Y. Risk factors for Salmonella prevalence in laying-hen farms in Japan. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012, 140, 982–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chousalkar, K.; Gast, R.; Martelli, F.; Pande, V. Review of egg-related salmonellosis and reduction strategies in United States, Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 44, 290–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McWhorter, A.R.; Chousalkar, K.K. A Long-Term Efficacy Trial of a Live, Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Vaccine in Layer Hens. Front. Microbiol 2018, 9, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kubasova, T.; Kollarcikova, M.; Crhanova, M.; Karasova, D.; Cejkova, D.; Sebkova, A.; Matiasovicova, J.; Faldynova, M.; Sisak, F.; Babak, V.; et al. Gut Anaerobes Capable of Chicken Caecum Colonisation. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Government of Western Australian. Media Statement: Call for Phase-Out of Battery Cages; Government of Western Australian: Perth, WA, Australia, 2018; Available online: https://www.mediastatements.wa.gov.au/Pages/McGowan/2018/03/Call-for-phase-out-of-battery-cages.aspx. (accessed on 2 April 2018).
- Anonymous. Baseline Study on the Prevalence of Salmonella in Laying Flocks of Gallus Gallus in the EU—Technical Specifications. SANCO/34/2004 Rev 3. 2004. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/salmonella/tech_spec_sanco-34-2004_rev-3_en.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2007).
- Carrique-Mas, J.J.; Breslin, M.; Sayers, A.R.; McLaren, I.; Arnold, M.; Davies, R. Comparison of environmental sampling methods for detecting Salmonella in commercial laying flocks in the UK. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 47, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mooijman, K.A. The new ISO 6579-1: A real horizontal standard for detection of Salmonella, at last! Food Microbial. 2018, 71, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Production System | Egg Business | No. of Birds in Each Farm | No. of +ve Flocks/No. of Sampled Flocks (%) | No. of +ve Samples/No. of Collected Samples (%) | Flock Environment Samples (No. Positive/No. Tested) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pooled Faecal Sample | Boot Swab—Inside | Boot Swab—Outside | Dust | Feed—Inside Shed | Feed—Outside Shed/Silo | Water—Inside Shed | |||||
Barn-laid | A | 27,000 | 4/5 | 8/49 (16.3) | — | 2/10 | 2/4 | 3/10 | 1/10 | 0/5 | 0/10 |
B | 32,000 | 2/2 | 11/24 (45.8) | 3/6 | 3/4 | — | 4/4 | 1/4 | 0/2 | 0/4 | |
C * | 40,000 | 0/2 | 0/18 (0.0) | — | 0/4 | — | 0/4 | 0/4 | 0/2 | 0/4 | |
E | 12,000 | 6/6 | 23/63 (36.5) | 15/27 | — | 2/6 | 6/12 | 0/6 | 0/6 | 0/6 | |
Overall barn-laid | 12/15 (80.0) | 42/154 (27.2) | 18/33 (54.5) | 5/18 (27.7) | 4/10 (40.0) | 13/30 (43.3) | 2/24 (8.3) | 0/15 (—) | 0/24 (—) | ||
Free-range | C * | 40,000 | 2/2 | 4/20 (20.0) | — | 2/4 | 1/2 | 1/4 | 0/4 | 0/2 | 0/4 |
D | 14,200 | 1/1 | 3/11 (27.2) | — | 0/2 | 1/2 | 2/2 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/2 | |
F | 20,000 | 5/5 | 29/50 (58.0) | — | 5/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 8/10 | 5/5 | 0/10 | |
G | 15,000 | 3/3 | 15/30 (50.0) | — | 5/6 | 0/3 | 4/6 | 4/6 | 2/3 | 0/6 | |
Overall free-range | 11/11 (100.0) | 51/111 (45.9) | — | 12/22 (54.5) | 5/12 (41.6) | 15/22 (68.1) | 12/24 (50.0) | 7/11 (63.6) | 0/22 (—) | ||
Totals | 23/26 (88.4) | 93/265 (35.0) | 18/33 (54.5) | 17/40 (42.5) | 9/22 (40.9) | 28/52 (53.8) | 14/46 (30.4) | 7/26 (26.9) | 0/46 (—) |
Production System | Egg Business | No. of +ve Flocks/No. of Sampled Flocks (%) | Serovar Diversity Pattern in Each Visited Egg Business | No. Flocks With the Serovar Pattern |
---|---|---|---|---|
Barn-laid | A | 4/5 | S. Orion | 2 |
S. Tennessee, S. Alsterdorf subs. II | 1 | |||
S. Muenchen | 1 | |||
B | 2/2 | S. Infantis | 1 | |
S. Infantis, S. Kiambu, S. Tennessee | 1 | |||
C | 0/2 | — | — | |
E | 6/6 | S. Typhimurium | 6 | |
Free-range | C | 2/2 | S. Typhimurium | 1 |
S. Typhimurium, S. Choleraesius v. Decatur | 1 | |||
D | 1/1 | S. Typhimurium | 1 | |
F | 5/5 | S. Typhimurium | 1 | |
S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis | 3 | |||
S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis, S. Anatum | 1 | |||
G | 3/3 | S. Typhimurium | 1 | |
S. Typhimurium, S. Infantis | 2 |
Question Categories | Variables | No. (%) of Egg Businesses |
---|---|---|
Locality | Metro | 5 (71.4) |
Out-metro | 2 (28.6) | |
Production system | Barn-laid | 3 (42.9) |
Free-range | 4 (57.1) | |
Quality management system | ||
Does your business have Quality Assurance/Food Safety Management Statement in place? | Yes | 7 (100.0) |
No | — | |
Does your business have a HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) based food safety program in place? | Yes | 7 (100.0) |
No | — | |
Who is responsible on HACCP management in your business? | External agent/service | 1(14.3) |
Onsite dedicated staff | 6 (85.7) | |
Feed and water supply | ||
How do you source stockfeed used for laying hens? | From manufacture or supplier | 7 (100) |
Assemble dry mash or pelleted feed onsite | — | |
What is the name of the feed supplier? | Supplier A | 3 (42.8) |
Supplier B | 2 (28.6) | |
Supplier C | 2 (28.6) | |
Do you test incoming feed for Salmonella? | Yes (sometimes) | 1 (14.3) |
No | 6 (85.7) | |
What is the source of water provided for laying hens? | Non-reticulated water, bore water | 4 (57.1) |
Non-reticulated water, dam water | 1 (14.3) | |
Reticulated water supply (scheme water) | 2 (28.6) | |
Layer management | ||
Are birds single- or multi-aged? | Single-aged | 7 (100) |
Multi-aged | — | |
Do you source replacement birds from single or multiple suppliers? | Single | 7 (100) |
Multiple | — | |
What is the name of the bird supplier? | Supplier X | 2 (28.6) |
Supplier Y | 4 (57.1) | |
Not answered | 1 (14.3) | |
Do you require replacement birds to be vaccinated against Salmonella? | Yes | 1 (14.3) |
No | 4 (57.1) | |
Sometimes | 1 (14.3) | |
Not answered | 1 (14.3) | |
Do you request a declaration from the hen stock supplier that chicks are tested free from Salmonella? | Yes | 4 (57.1) |
No | 2 (28.6) | |
Not answered | 1 (14.3) | |
Do you routinely take microbiological samples for testing for Salmonella in layers farm environment throughout production age? | Yes | 4 (57.1) |
No | 3 (42.9) | |
Do you routinely take microbiological samples for verification testing of cleaning and sanitisation program between flocks? | Yes | 1 (14.3) |
No | 5 (71.4) | |
Not answered | 1 (14.3) | |
Aspects of biosecurity management | ||
Does your business have a policy of restricted person’s access (staff and verified visitors only)? | Yes | 7 (100.0) |
No | — | |
For visitors, do you have a policy of insisting on a 48- to 72-hour delay in between farm visits? | Yes | 4 (57.1) |
No | 3 (42.9) | |
For visitors, do you maintain vehicle wheel wash? | Yes | 1 (14.3) |
No | 6 (85.7) | |
At each shed entry, do you maintain footbaths filled with sanitiser? | Yes | 5 (71.4) |
No | 2 (28.6) | |
At each shed entry, do you maintain handwashing facilities (basin)? | Yes | 5 (71.4) |
No | 2 (28.6) | |
Before shed entry is there an ante-room facility? | Yes | 5 (71.4) |
No | 2 (28.6) | |
Are workers and visitors required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) and/or specific protective clothes before entering the shed? | Yes | 3 (42.9) |
No | 4 (57.1) | |
Are workers and visitors required to change their clothes while walking between sheds? | Yes | 1 (14.3) |
No | 5 (71.4) | |
Not answered | 1 (14.3) | |
Do wild animals and birds have access to laying sheds? | Yes | 3 (42.9) |
No | 4 (57.1) | |
Do rodents have access to laying sheds? | Yes | 6 (85.7) |
No | 1 (14.3) | |
Do domestic pets have access to laying sheds? | Yes | — |
No | 7 (100.0) | |
Do you keep other livestock on the farm? | Yes | 3 (42.9) |
No | 4 (57.1) | |
Egg handling practices and processes | ||
What is the egg collection method used by business? | Fully automated | 1 (14.3) |
Semi-automated | 3 (42.8) | |
By hand | 3 (42.8) | |
What is the egg grading method used by business? | Fully automated | 1 (14.3) |
Semi-automated | 3 (42.9) | |
By hand | 3 (42.8) | |
How frequently are eggs collected on a daily basis? | Once/day | 3 (42.9) |
Twice/day | 1 (14.3) | |
Three times and more/day | 3 (42.8) | |
How long is the storage period for collected eggs before egg grading (time between collections to grading)? | Within 24 hrs | 4 (57.1) |
Up to 48 hrs | 3 (42.9) | |
What is the typical storage temperature of pre-graded eggs? | Ambient | 4 (57.1) |
≤15°C | 3 (42.9) | |
How often do you sanitise egg handling equipment? | Daily | 4 (57.1) |
Weekly | 1 (14.3) | |
Monthly | 1 (14.3) | |
Not answered | 1 (14.3) | |
Which of the following best describes the hairline crack detection system you have in place? | Visual | 3 (42.9) |
Candling | 4 (57.1) |
Sample Type | Collection Methodology from Each Flock |
---|---|
Pooled faecal material | Approximately 200–300 g or 40 fecal pinches were collected from different areas of the shed floor or deep pit. |
Dust | Approximately 50 g of dust was collected from 40 different surfaces with a visible dust presence, including ledges, tops of nest boxes, and ventilators, inside each shed and placed into Whirl-Pak sample bags. |
Boot swab | Boot swabs were worn over sterile plastic boot covers and sprayed with sterile water. Approximately 100 shuffling steps were taken over different parts of bird access areas inside and outside of sheds. |
Feed | Approximately 250 g of feed was collected from feed troughs and feeder silos. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sodagari, H.R.; Habib, I.; Whiddon, S.; Wang, P.; Mohammed, A.B.; Robertson, I.; Goodchild, S. Occurrence and Characterization of Salmonella Isolated from Table Egg Layer Farming Environments in Western Australia and Insights into Biosecurity and Egg Handling Practices. Pathogens 2020, 9, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010056
Sodagari HR, Habib I, Whiddon S, Wang P, Mohammed AB, Robertson I, Goodchild S. Occurrence and Characterization of Salmonella Isolated from Table Egg Layer Farming Environments in Western Australia and Insights into Biosecurity and Egg Handling Practices. Pathogens. 2020; 9(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010056
Chicago/Turabian StyleSodagari, Hamid Reza, Ihab Habib, Scott Whiddon, Penghao Wang, Arkan Baraa Mohammed, Ian Robertson, and Stan Goodchild. 2020. "Occurrence and Characterization of Salmonella Isolated from Table Egg Layer Farming Environments in Western Australia and Insights into Biosecurity and Egg Handling Practices" Pathogens 9, no. 1: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010056
APA StyleSodagari, H. R., Habib, I., Whiddon, S., Wang, P., Mohammed, A. B., Robertson, I., & Goodchild, S. (2020). Occurrence and Characterization of Salmonella Isolated from Table Egg Layer Farming Environments in Western Australia and Insights into Biosecurity and Egg Handling Practices. Pathogens, 9(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010056