Next Article in Journal
Wild and Domestic Canids and Their Interactions in the Transmission Cycles of Trypanosoma Cruzi and Leishmania spp. in an Area of the Brazilian Cerrado
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of a Putative Novel Papillomavirus Type within a Large Exophytic Papilloma on the Fetlock of a Horse
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/pathogens9100817
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Tissue Proteases and Immune Responses: Influencing Factors of COVID-19 Severity and Mortality

by
Natália Mulinari Turin de Oliveira
1,2,†,
Isabella Fernandes da Silva Figueiredo
1,2,†,
Liziane Cristine Malaquias da Silva
1,2,
Karien Sauruk da Silva
1,2,
Laryssa Regis Bueno
1,2,
Bruna Barbosa da Luz
3,
Cláudia Rita Corso
1,2,
Maria Fernanda Paula Werner
3,
Elizabeth Soares Fernandes
1,2 and
Daniele Maria-Ferreira
1,2,*
1
Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Av. Iguaçu No 333, Curitiba, PR 80250-200, Brazil
2
Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Av. Silva Jardim No 1532, Curitiba, PR 80250-200, Brazil
3
Departamento de Farmacologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR 81531-980, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2020, 9(10), 817; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100817
Submission received: 9 September 2020 / Revised: 2 October 2020 / Accepted: 4 October 2020 / Published: 6 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Immunological Responses and Immune Defense Mechanisms)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is caused by the highly transmissible severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which has affected the global population despite socioeconomic status and amazed surveillance agencies for its incidence, mortality, and recovery rates. COVID-19 affects all age groups; however, it is suggested to progress into severe disease and cause mortality in over 10% of the confirmed cases, depending on the individual characteristics of the affected population. One of the biggest unanswered questions it is why only some individuals develop into the severe stages of the disease. Current data indicate that most of the critically ill are the elderly or those with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and asthma. However, it has been noted that, in some populations, severe disease is mostly observed in much younger individuals (<60-years old) with no reported underlying medical conditions. Certainly, many factors may contribute to disease severity including intrinsic host factors such as genetic variants, the expression levels of tissue proteins, among others. Considering all these aspects, this review aims to discuss how the expression levels of tissue proteases and the different profiles of immune responses influence the susceptibility to COVID-19 as well as disease severity and outcome.

1. Introduction

The emerging ongoing outbreak of pneumonia known as coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has posed as a massive global public health crisis that rapidly disseminated worldwide. As of 9 September 2020, more than 27 million cases of the disease have been globally recorded, with nearly 900,000 deaths, exceeding the combined number of the individuals infected by the Middle East respiratory coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV, as well as their associated deaths [1].
Coronaviruses (CoVs) belong to the family Coronaviridae, order Nidovirales, and are the largest known RNA viruses classified into the following four types: α, β, γ, and δ [2]. They have long been recognized as important pathogens that can be transmitted from human to human causing mild to severe respiratory tract and intestinal infections with high morbidity and mortality [3]. SARS-CoV-2 belongs to subgenus Sarbecovirus and comprises a large β-enveloped, non-segmented positive-sense RNA virus, with approximately 30,000 bases in length [4] encoding 9860 amino acids [5]. Full-length genome sequences indicate that SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to SARS-CoV sharing 79.6% sequence identity [6]. Like other CoVs, SARS-CoV-2 is composed of four structural proteins, known as S (spike), E (envelope), and M (membrane) proteins, which compose the viral envelope, and N (nucleocapsid) protein, which holds the RNA genome [5]. The S protein recognizes and binds to its receptor, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), is a vital pathway for virus entry and replication into the human lung alveolar epithelial cells [4].
Although most of the infected individuals are asymptomatic or display mild symptoms, COVID-19-associated severe cases are characterized by progressive respiratory failure and lethal pneumonia. Current reports suggest that severe cases of COVID-19 are most frequent in the elderly population or those with comorbidities, including asthma, heart disease, and diabetes [6]. In contrast, in some specific populations, severe cases have been also often observed in much younger individuals (<60 years old) with no disabling conditions [7]. The broad range of individuals affected by severe disease has raised a highly important debate on the importance of host–pathogen interactions as major influencing factors of disease outcome.
By comprehending these variables, it will be easier to identify which populations are to suffer the hardest with COVID-19, and tailor better management rules and treatment options to avoiding disease contagion and progression. Herein, we discuss some of the intrinsic factors associated with COVID-19 severity and mortality, with a special focus on the tissue proteins and immune responses involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

2. Pathogenesis of COVID-19

An elevated case fatality rate in males was previously observed for respiratory tract infections such as the ones caused by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [8,9]. A similar gender-related influence on COVID-19 has also been suggested, with men more prone to severe disease and mortality. Indeed, SARS-CoV-2 mostly infected males in Wuhan (68%) [10]. Additionally, in Italy, 58% of the diagnosed COVID-19 patients are males, with the highest mortality rates observed for this gender (70%) [11]. Several factors are suggested to underlie the gender influence in COVID-19 including the sex hormones, immunity, ACE2 activity, as well as behavioral and cultural habits, such as smoking [12]. In fact, male smokers in China represent 288 million individuals in contrast to the 12.6 million of declared female smokers [13]. A similar scenario is observed in Italy. Smoking prevalence is much higher among men than women at any age group [14].
Another important aspect to be considered is the aging of the population, as it has been pointed out as a risk factor for severe disease and mortality, as well as for increased contamination. Notably, recent reports have shown that the elderly are the most susceptible to lethality in countries such as Italy and China, which present high numbers of individuals over 60 years old [15]. Indeed, people ranging from 40 to 49 years of age had an estimated case fatality rate of 0.4%, whereas individuals ≥ 80 years old presented 20.2% mortality [16]. A worse prognosis was also strongly associated with underlying comorbidities [17], with case fatality rates higher in individuals with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes, and tumors [18]. However, rare severe cases and mortality have also been observed in children, with reports associating them with the development of a hyperinflammatory shock [19]. In some countries, a significant proportion of previously healthy individuals ≤ 50 years of age have also developed severe COVID-19, with fatalities being registered in this group [20]. Although surprising, statistics on the subject are yet scarce as data continue to be collected from all around the world with this ongoing disease.
These findings suggest that not only age and gender, but also other intrinsic host factors are essential to predisposing an individual to experiencing severe disease and lethality. In this context, and in the hope of defining better options for the clinical management of COVID-19, ongoing research studies have been dedicated to dissecting the genetic characteristics as well as the gene and protein expression patterns of human cells that may influence disease outcome.
Primarily defined as a disease of the respiratory tract, SARS-CoV-2 infection is now known to cause a systemic pathogenesis, targeting multiple organs and ultimately leading to their failure and to patient death (Figure 1). Disease transmission is still uncertain, but it is thought to happen through direct contact, respiratory droplets, or aerosols, and even by ingestion of viral particles [21]. Once transmitted to an individual, the virus enters the human cells via a direct interaction of its spike protein with the host ACE2. ACE2 is highly expressed not only in human alveolar epithelial cells, but also in various others including the tongue and oral mucosa epithelial cells, leukocytes, blood vessels, heart, kidney, endothelium, and intestine [22,23,24]. Other broadly expressed host proteins contribute to an effective infection of SARS-CoV-2 into human cells including the proteases furin and furin-like proteins [25], transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), and the cathepsin B and L (CatB/L) [26]. At this early phase of infection, the expression profiles of these proteins as well as interferon (IFN) production are determinant pathways for disease outcome. As disease progresses, cellular immune responses become essential players in the host fight to SARS-CoV-2. Imbalances in these pathways such as defective IFN production or ineffective cell migration/activation may, therefore, result in a worsened disease prognosis.
Different studies have investigated the immune responses involved in COVID-19; however, few of them have been able to correlate disease severity and the different players of immunity. So far, differences in inflammatory mediator release and immune cells have been observed. Following lung infection, there is an intense inflammatory response with the lungs exhibiting edema and mononuclear infiltrates, especially of lymphocytes [27]. At the systemic level, lymphopenia has been observed and linked to an increased severity of COVID-19, in addition to mortality [28]. Individuals with severe disease also present higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios, low numbers of CD4+, and deficiency of memory and regulatory T cells [29]. In another report, a patient with mild to moderate disease exhibited normal lymphocyte and neutrophil counts; however, T lymphocytes (CD8+ and CD4+ cells) were elevated at one-week post-symptom initiation [30]. More recently, neutrophil-derived extracellular traps (NETs) were associated with severe COVID-19 [31]. Of note, NETs are involved in both inflammation and thrombosis, this later considered as another hallmark of SARS-CoV-2 infection [32]. Systemic inflammatory levels were also associated with disease severity. Indeed, while high levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 were detected in severe disease, low levels of cytokine and chemokines were found in patients with milder infection [29,30]. Increased circulating levels of IL-6 were also correlated with cardiac injury and mortality in COVID-19 patients [33]. Interestingly, IFN-mediated responses were suggested to be delayed by SARS-CoV-2 [34]; however, the bronchoalveolar release of IFN as well as the expression of IFN-associated genes seem to correlate with severe disease in some critically ill individuals [35].
Cardiovascular complications such as coronary heart disease, heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease have been observed in COVID-19 patients as a result of infection-related myocarditis and/or ischemia. Increased sympathetic stimulation, hypercoagulability, and inflammation are thought to contribute to these cardiovascular events [36,37,38]. Another remarkable complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection is renal failure, which has been frequently observed in patients with the severe form of COVID-19 [39,40,41]; this may be either a direct effect of the virus, or a result from the hypoxia observed following infection. Additionally, pre-existing cardiovascular and kidney diseases have been considered as risk factors for COVID-19; therefore, it is possible that infection can contribute to exacerbate such conditions.
Although less common than the cardiovascular and kidney alterations, gastrointestinal tract manifestations have also been implicated in COVID-19. Abdominal pain, anorexia, impaired liver function, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting have been noted in SARS-CoV-2 infection and were more frequent in individuals in critical condition [40,42,43]. Post-mortem analysis indicated that patients who died of severe disease presented small intestine alterations such as dilatation and stenosis; gastrointestinal mucosal degeneration, necrosis, and shedding; in addition to edema and lymphocyte influx into the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and rectum lamina propria [44,45]. It is estimated that over 30% of COVID-19-positive patients present viral load in their stool samples, even when their nasopharyngeal samples are negative for SARS-CoV-2 [46,47,48]. Furthermore, viral proteins were found in gastric, duodenal, and rectal epithelial cells [45]. This later finding suggests that the gastrointestinal symptoms of COVID-19 may result from the direct interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with the gastrointestinal cells.
Testicular tissue damage and defects in spermatogenesis were previously observed during the SARS-CoV outbreak [27]. Despite the scarce literature, recent reports also indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 infection may affect the testicular tissue. Adult human scRNA-seq datasets suggest that the testis is potentially vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection [49]. It is important to highlight that these are early findings, and it is currently uncertain how COVID-19 affects the reproductive functions over the short and long terms. Therefore, monitoring of male patients following recovery from acute infection is strongly advised.
Collectively, these evidences indicate that both the inflammatory scenario and the ubiquitous expression of ACE2 and the aforementioned tissue proteases contribute to the variety of symptoms of COVID-19 infection, which range from dyspnea and bilateral pneumonia, to tachycardia and diarrhea.

3. Illness Degree and Association with Host Tissue Proteins and Immune Responses

An important question on the current pandemic scenario is why not all infected individuals develop life-threatening disease. Although most of the critical cases are related to the elderly or those with underlying problems, some individuals are asymptomatic or display mild flu-like symptoms. Certainly, the susceptibility to infection cannot be attributed only to demographic or socioeconomic factors, as genetic differences may also strongly account for COVID-19 outcome. Genetic variability of genes involved in the expression of host–pathogen interaction proteins and inflammatory mediators are among the suggested host predisposing factors that may influence disease severity and mortality. This is discussed below.

3.1. Tissue Protein Expression

Among the proteins suggested to contribute to cell infection by SARS-CoV-2, ACE2 is perhaps the most well investigated. As previously discussed, SARS-CoV-2 invasion and trafficking into human cells are primarily driven by the interaction of its spike protein with human ACE2 [26]. Some reports have suggested that variations in ACE2 gene sequences may influence cell infection and viral load and, consequently, disease severity or resistance to SARS-CoV-2 (Table 1). In 2020, by using molecular modeling tools, Hussein et al. [50] identified ACE2 encoding variants that corresponded to the binding sites for the SARS-COV-2 spike protein. They found that most of the ACE2 variants present similar binding affinities to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. However, two ACE2 alleles, namely rs143936283 (E329G) and rs73635825 (S19P), displayed low binding affinity to the virus and lacked key residues important to the complex formation with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Additional studies on ACE2 tissue expression and distribution were also performed. ScRNA-seq analysis revealed that Asian males present higher lung expression of ACE2 in comparison to Caucasian and African American individuals [23]. Moreover, the frequency of allele variants associated with increased ACE2 tissue expression was found to be higher in East Asian populations in comparison to other populations, such as the European, African, South Asian, and American ones [51]. In contrast, no substantial evidences have associated ACE2 expression with COVID-19 severity [13,53]. However, more robust studies on large cohorts need to be performed in order to establish whether there are any direct links between ACE2 expression and disease outcome. Interestingly, tobacco smoking was found to increase the pulmonary expression of ACE2, including in the small airway epithelia [61,62]. These findings suggest that smokers may be more susceptible to COVID-19.
An important aspect to consider is the percentage of individuals with diseases such as hypertension and diabetes who developed severe COVID-19. ACE2 is essential not only to virus entry, but also to the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, exerting a protective role in cardiovascular diseases [63] and diabetes [64]. So far, the association between ACE2 expression and the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection is conflicting. In fact, while some data suggest that an increased expression of ACE2 favors the progression of the disease [52], others indicate that COVID-19 leads to a reduction of ACE2 activity in elderly individuals with chronic diseases, resulting in angiotensin II/ACE2 regulation imbalance and loss of ACE2 protective effects [54]. Furthermore, the low incidence of severe cases in children may be related to lower ACE2 expression [65,66]. Of importance, it has also been speculated on whether treatment with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers affect the course of COVID-19 as they may enhance the disruption of the angiotensin II–ACE2 axis [67].
Alterations in the expression patterns of host tissue proteases necessary to virus replication may also favor resistance or susceptibility to COVID-19. In this context, genetic variants of TMPRSS2 have been investigated (Table 1). Analysis of the Italian exome and GnomAD data detected genetic variants that may impact TMPRSS2 expression and its catalytic activity. The Italian population presented a decreased burden of deleterious variants compared with other European populations [53]. It is thus possible that Italians have enhanced TMPRSS2 activity, and that this results in a higher risk of a more severe form of COVID-19 [53]. Notably, genetic variants for TMPRSS2 were already shown to enhance the risk to severe A(H1N1) pdm09 and A(H7N9) influenza [54]. Interestingly, as suggested for ACE2, the low expression of TMPRSS2 in the airway epithelial and alveolar type 2 cells of infants and young children may protect them from SARS-CoV-2 infection [66]. Despite the early findings relating ACE2 and TMPRSS2 to COVID-19, a link between SARS-CoV-2 infection outcome and other proteases such as furin and cathepsin B/L is yet to be established. A genetic variation in the proximal CTSL1 promoter, especially at position C-171A, was associated with higher blood pressure [58]. It was also demonstrated that the furin gene contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension and is crucial to the renin–angiotensin system [55]. For instance, the coronary artery disease genetic variant rs17514846 increases furin expression and this may be related to reduced monocyte migration and proliferation in humans [56]. Accordingly, the variant rs17514846 at the 15q26.1 locus was recently linked to higher circulating monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels and greater carotid intima-media thickness in comparison with non-carrier individuals [57]. The same study also demonstrated that furin knockdown in vascular endothelial cells reduces endothelial cell-mediated inflammation as well as monocyte adhesion to and transmigration through these cells [57]. A similar profile was observed in mice with atherosclerotic lesions treated with furin inhibitors (α-1-PDX, RP-070) [68]. Possible outcomes of COVID-19 and their associations with these genetic variations of furin and cathepsin B/L are depicted in Table 1.

3.2. Immune Response

Hyperinflammation is a hallmark of COVID-19. As previously mentioned, an association between the degree of inflammation resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity and outcome has been observed. In fact, studies have attempted to investigate the inflammatory responses of patients with different severities of COVID-19 (Table 2). Both moderate and severe patients exhibit hyperinflammation characterized by increased circulating levels of cytokines and chemokines [12,29,41,69,70,71], whereas those with mild disease display normal levels of these inflammatory mediators [12,70,71]. Patients with moderate and severe disease also present with increased levels of chemokines in their bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples, while elevated cytokines are only observed in the BALF of individuals with severe disease [72].
Differences in COVID-19 severity have been linked to not only inflammatory mediator release, but also to changes in the numbers of inflammatory cells (Table 2). In fact, those with mild disease present normal peripheral blood lymphocyte counts and diminished numbers of neutrophils [12,70,71]. Evidence also indicates that individuals with moderate disease display an increased accumulation of mononuclear cells in their BALF samples, whereas those with severe COVID-19 present with a higher percentage of BALF neutrophils [72]. At the systemic level, low numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ cells have been observed [12,29,41,69,70,71,72]. In a detailed analysis of leukocyte subsets, Silvin et al. [73] demonstrated that patients with severe disease exhibit an accumulation of immature neutrophils (CD10LowCD101− and CD10LowCD16Low cells) and a reduction of the CD14LowCD16High monocyte population in their peripheral blood in comparison with those of individuals who were negative for SARS-CoV-2 or presented mild disease. Lower frequencies of circulating T and B lymphocytes were also noted in these patients, as well as an increase of ROS- and NO-producing monocytes. Enhanced numbers of ROS/NO-releasing cells and immature neutrophils were observed in the BALF levels of severe patients [73]. Another study identified distinct immune signatures based on peripheral blood lymphocyte counts and activation of individuals with COVID-19 and associated them with disease severity [75]. These studies indicate the importance of monitoring the profiles of leukocytes to aid in the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Less common in children, a multiple organ disorder associated with hyperinflammatory shock has been observed in this age group. A report from the United Kingdom indicated that, despite being negative for COVID-19, eight children developed a severe syndrome characterized not only by respiratory distress and pneumonia, but also by hypotension, rashes, conjunctivitis, peripheral edema, generalized pain, and diarrhea [19]. Similar symptoms were observed in SARS-CoV-2-positive critically ill American children [76].
These different patterns of inflammation in COVID-19 patients may be related to differences in the expression of genes involved in the cellular and humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 (Table 1). The expression patterns of human leukocyte antigen – DR isotype (HLA-DR) and inflammatory mediator genes are known to highly influence the immune response to infectious diseases. Nonetheless, it is not surprising that they have been investigated in COVID-19. Peripheral blood HLA-DR+CD8+ and HLA-DR+CD4+ T-cell populations were elevated in patients with mild to moderate infection in comparison with healthy subjects [27,30]. These cells were found to co-express CD38 and were larger producers of granzymes and perforin, preceding the resolution of symptoms [30]. In contrast, patients with the severe form of the disease displayed lower expression of HLA-DR on their circulating monocytes than healthy individuals, a response that was associated with increased circulating levels of IL-6 produced by both blood monocytes and CD4+ cells [59]. In another study, HLA binding affinity for SARS-CoV-2 proteome was assessed by in silico analysis [77]. The study showed that the HLA-B*46:01 is the allele with the smallest number of binding peptides for SARS-CoV-2 and that other alleles such as HLA-A*02:02, HLA-B*15:03, and HLA-C*12:03 were potentially the greatest SARS-CoV-2 antigen-presenting molecules. As IL-6 production downregulates HLA-DR expression on monocytes of severe patients, alterations in the individual expression of this cytokine would be also worth investigating. Interestingly, patients with severe COVID-19 exhibited higher levels of plasma IL-6 and expressed lower levels of HLA-DRA and HLA-DRB1 in their peripheral blood and BALF monocytes/macrophages than individuals who were negative to SARS-CoV-2 or those with mild disease [73].
IFN plays an essential role in the host responses to viral infections; therefore, reduced levels of this cytokine may result in a defective viral clearance and higher severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality. In an early study, Blanco-Melo et al. [74] demonstrated that severe COVID-19 patients display a hindered pulmonary and systemic production of IFNs. Furthermore, IFN-mediated responses were suggested to be delayed by SARS-CoV-2 infection [78]. Neglected systemic levels of IFN-γ were detected in a patient with mild to moderate COVID-19 [30]. The authors also investigated and detected in this patient the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs12252-C/C in the gene IFITM3, involved in the encoding of the interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3 and previously linked to increased risk to severe influenza infections [79]. The IFITM3-rs12252-C/C variant was detected in ~26% of the Chinese population, which presented a mortality rate of 6% for COVID-19. Although no other studies have analyzed IFN-γ profiles in other populations affected by SARS-CoV-2, IFITM3-rs12252-C/C was linked to a high risk of influenza in both the White and East Asian populations [60], suggesting that this variant may also be largely detected around the globe. Of note, some individuals with critical disease presented IFN in their bronchoalveolar lavage and expressed genes associated with IFN release [80]. Whether these patients are able to deal better with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains to be investigated. More recently, genetic variants of TLR3 and IRF7, which result in deficiency of such pathways, were detected in whole blood samples and linked to impaired production of IFN-α and severe COVID-19 [81]. Additionally, a significant number of individuals with life-threatening SARS-CoV-2 infection was found to present IgG auto-antibodies against IFN-α and/or IFN-ω [82]. The same study demonstrated that these molecules neutralize the ability of IFN-α to block viral infection in vitro. Of note, these auto-antibodies were not present in patients who were asymptomatic or had mild disease. Overall, these studies indicate an essential role for IFN in the host response to SARS-CoV-2. However, further studies are necessary to determine IFN definite roles in the susceptibility and resistance to COVID-19.

4. Conclusions

Much is yet to be understood about COVID-19. As discussed, the SARS-CoV-2 infection is a systemic and multi-factorial disease to which mortality and morbidity depend on several aspects of the host response to infection, especially on the intrinsic differences between the individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2. So far, the findings point towards an important role for the intrinsic expressions and activities of ACE2, the discussed tissue proteases, and the immune pathways involved in individuals and COVID-19 outcomes. However, research on this matter is a novel field with many questions that remain to be answered. Therefore, further studies on the mechanisms underlying an individual’s susceptibility to develop severe or fatal COVID-19 are of great need, so better management tools can be developed for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Author Contributions

The overall information on disease pathogenesis was compiled by N.M.T.d.O., I.F.d.S.F., and L.C.M.d.S.; the selection of manuscripts and the compilation of information on tissue proteases were performed by K.S.d.S., L.R.B., and B.B.d.L.; N.M.T.d.O. and C.R.C. selected the manuscripts and compiled the information on the immune response to SARS-CoV-2; these authors contributed to drafting of the manuscript. The study was conceived and designed by D.M.-F., E.S.F., and M.F.P.W., who critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; Brazil; grant numbers: 305676/2019-9 and 408053/2018-6), the Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe (Brazil), and INCT-INOVAMEDm(Brazil). C.R.C. is a post-doc student, N.M.T.d.O. and B.B.d.L. are PhD students, receiving a grant from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES; finance code 001;Brazil), and L.R.B. is an MSc student receiving a grant from the Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rockx, B.; Kuiken, T.; Herfst, S.; Bestebroer, T.; Lamers, M.; de Meulder, D.; van Amerongen, G.; van den Brand, J.; Okba, H.; Schipper, D.; et al. Comparative Pathogenesis Of COVID-19, MERS And SARS In A Non-Human Primate Model. bioRxiv 2020. Available online: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.17.995639v1 (accessed on 20 March 2020). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Peck, K.M.; Burch, C.L.; Heise, M.T.; Baric, R.S. Coronavirus Host Range Expansion and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Emergence: Biochemical Mechanisms and Evolutionary Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2015, 2, 95–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wevers, B.A.; van der Hoek, L. Recently Discovered Human Coronaviruses. Clin. Lab. Med. 2009, 29, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Letko, M.; Marzi, A.; Munster, V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Chan, J.F.-W.; Kok, K.-H.; Zhu, Z.; Chu, H.; To, K.K.-W.; Yuan, S.; Yuen, K.-Y. Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.-L.; Wang, X.-G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.-R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.-L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. CDC. COVID-19 Rapid Response Team Guidance. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/rtt-management-introduction.html (accessed on 5 October 2020).
  8. Matsuyama, R.; Nishiura, H.; Kutsuna, S.; Hayakawa, K.; Ohmagari, N. Clinical determinants of the severity of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Channappanavar, R.; Fett, C.; Mack, M.; Eyck., P.P.T.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Perlman, S. Sex-based differences in susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. J. Immunol 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, L.; Li, X.; Chen, M.; Feng, Y.; Xiong, C. The ACE2 expression in human heart indicates new potential mechanism of heart injury among patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Remuzzi, A.; Remuzzi, G. COVID-19 and Italy: What next? Lancet 2020, 395, 1225–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, J.; Ji, H.; Zheng, W.; Wu, X.; Zhu, J.J.; Arnold, A.P.; Sandberg, K. Sex differences in renal angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activity are 17β-oestradiol-dependent and sex chromosome-independent. Biol. Sex. Differ. 2010, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Cai, G. Bulk and single-cell transcriptomics identify tobacco-use disparity in lung gene expression of ACE2, the receptor of 2019-nCov. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Department, S.R. “Number of Smokers by Age and Gender in Italy 2018.” Statista. Available online: www.statista.com/statistics/501615/italy-smokers-by-age-and-gender/ (accessed on 5 October 2020).
  15. Porcheddu, R.; Serra, C.; Kelvin, D.; Kelvin, N.; Rubino, S. Similarity in Case Fatality Rates (CFR) of COVID-19/SARS-COV-2 in Italy and China. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2020, 14, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Onder, G.; Rezza, G.; Brusaferro, S. Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in Relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020, 323, 1775–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Verity, R.; Okell, L.C.; Dorigatti, I.; Winskill, P.; Whittaker, C.; Imai, N.; Cuomo-Dannenburg, G.; Thompson, H.; Walker, P.G.T.; Fu, H.; et al. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: A model-based analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gabutti, G.; D’Anchera, E.; Sandri, F.; Savio, M.; Stefanati, A. Coronavirus: Update Related to the Current Outbreak of COVID-19. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2020, 9, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Riphagen, S.; Gomez, X.; Gonzalez-Martinez, C.; Wilkinson, N.; Theocharis, P. Hyperinflammatory shock in children during COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2020, 395, 1607–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, S.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Casanova, J.L.; Su, H.C.; Abel, L.; Bastard, P.; Cobat, A.; Jouanguy, E.; Notarangelo, L. Severe COVID-19 in the young and healthy: Monogenic inborn errors of immunity? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 455–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fung, S.-Y.; Yuen, K.-S.; Ye, Z.-W.; Chan, C.-P.; Jin, D.-Y. A tug-of-war between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and host antiviral defence: Lessons from other pathogenic viruses. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, H.; Kang, Z.; Gong, H.; Xu, D.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Cui, X.; Xiao, J.; Zhan, J.; et al. Digestive system is a potential route of COVID-19: An analysis of single-cell coexpression pattern of key proteins in viral entry process. Gut 2020, 69, 1010–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zuo, W. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCov. BioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, H.; Zhong, L.; Deng, J.; Peng, J.; Dan, H.; Zeng, X.; Li, T.; Chen, Q. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Coutard, B.; Valle, C.; de Lamballerie, X.; Canard, B.; Seidah, N.G.; Decroly, E. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, Z.; Shi, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Zhao, P.; Liu, H.; Zhu, L.; et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z.G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.W.; Tian, J.H.; Pei, Y.Y.; et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Qin, C.; Zhou, L.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, S.; Tao, Y.; Xie, C.; Ma, K.; Shang, K.; Wang, W.; et al. Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients With Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 762–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thevarajan, I.; Nguyen, T.H.O.; Koutsakos, M.; Druce, J.; Caly, L.; van de Sandt, C.E.; Jia, X.; Nicholson, S.; Catton, M.; Cowie, B.; et al. Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: A case report of non-severe COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 453–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zuo, Y.; Yalavarthi, S.; Shi, H.; Gockman, K.; Zuo, M.; Madison, J.A.; Blair, C.N.; Weber, A.; Barnes, B.J.; Egeblad, M.; et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. JCI Insight 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. McFadyen, J.D.; Stevens, H.; Peter, K. The Emerging Threat of (Micro)Thrombosis in COVID-19 and Its Therapeutic Implications. Circ. Res. 2020, 127, 571–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ruan, Q.; Yang, K.; Wang, W.; Jiang, L.; Song, J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020, 46, 846–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Acharya, D.; Liu, G.; Gack, M.U. Dysregulation of type I interferon responses in COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhou, F.; Yu, T.; Du, R.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, Y.-R.; Cao, Q.-D.; Hong, Z.-S.; Tan, Y.-Y.; Chen, S.-D.; Jin, H.-J.; Tan, K.-S.; Wang, D.-Y.; Yan, Y. The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak- A n update on the status. Mil. Med. Res. 2020, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Inciardi, R.M.; Lupi, L.; Zaccone, G.; Italia, L.; Raffo, M.; Tomasoni, D.; Cani, D.S.; Cerini, M.; Farina, D.; Gavazzi, E.; et al. Cardiac Involvement in a Patient With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Shi, S.; Qin, M.; Shen, B.; Cai, Y.; Liu, T.; Yang, F.; Gong, W.; Liu, X.; Liang, J.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lescure, F.-X.; Bouadma, L.; Nguyen, D.; Parisey, M.; Wicky, P.-H.; Behillil, S.; Gaymard, A.; Bouscambert-Duchamp, M.; Donati, F.; Le Hingrat, Q.; et al. Clinical and virological data of the first cases of COVID-19 in Europe: A case series. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, D.; Hu, B.; Hu, C.; Zhu, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Xiang, H.; Cheng, Z.; Xiong, Y.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020, 323, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, X.; Yu, Y.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.; Xia, J.; Liu, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Z.; Fang, M.; et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jin, X.; Lian, J.-S.; Hu, J.-H.; Gao, J.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Hao, S.-R.; Jia, H.-Y.; Cai, H.; Zhang, X.-L.; et al. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of coronavirus-infected disease 2019 (COVID-19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lin, L.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, Z.; Gu, Z.; Gao, L.; Shi, H.; Mai, L.; et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms of 95 cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Gut 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tian, Y.; Rong, L.; Nian, W.; He, Y. Review article: Gastrointestinal features in COVID-19 and the possibility of faecal transmission. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xiao, F.; Tang, M.; Zheng, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Shan, H. Evidence for Gastrointestinal Infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ling, Y.; Xu, S.-B.; Lin, Y.-X.; Tian, D.; Zhu, Z.-Q.; Dai, F.-H.; Wu, F.; Song, Z.-G.; Huang, W.; Chen, J.; et al. Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients. Chin. Med. J. (Engl). 2020, 133, 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xing, Y.-H.; Ni, W.; Wu, Q.; Li, W.-J.; Li, G.-J.; Wang, W.-D.; Tong, J.-N.; Song, X.-F.; Wing-Kin Wong, G.; Xing, Q.-S. Prolonged viral shedding in feces of pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 53, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Xue, Y. Fecal specimen diagnosis 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 680–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Wang, X.; Xu, W.; Hu, G.; Xia, S.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Z.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, R.; Jiang, S.; Lu, L. RETRACTED ARTICLE: SARS-CoV-2 infects T lymphocytes through its spike protein-mediated membrane fusion. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hussain, M.; Jabeen, N.; Raza, F.; Shabbir, S.; Baig, A.A.; Amanullah, A.; Aziz, B. Structural variations in human ACE2 may influence its binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. J. Med. Virol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Cao, Y.; Li, L.; Feng, Z.; Wan, S.; Huang, P.; Sun, X.; Wen, F.; Huang, X.; Ning, G.; Wang, W. Comparative genetic analysis of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) receptor ACE2 in different populations. Cell Discov. 2020, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. South, A.M.; Diz, D.I.; Chappell, M.C. COVID-19, ACE2, and the cardiovascular consequences. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2020, 318, H1084–H1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Asselta, R.; Paraboschi, E.M.; Mantovani, A.; Duga, S. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 Variants and Expression as Candidates to Sex and Country Differences in COVID-19 Severity in Italy. 2020. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3559608 (accessed on 5 October 2020). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Cheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G. Organ-protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and its effect on the prognosis of COVID-19. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, N.; Luo, W.; Juhong, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, H.; Zhou, L.; Chang, J. Associations between genetic variations in the FURIN gene and hypertension. BMC Med. Genet. 2010, 11, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Zhao, G.; Yang, W.; Wu, J.; Chen, B.; Yang, X.; Chen, J.; McVey, D.G.; Andreadi, C.; Gong, P.; Webb, T.R.; et al. Influence of a Coronary Artery Disease–Associated Genetic Variant on FURIN Expression and Effect of Furin on Macrophage Behavior. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 1837–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Yang, X.; Yang, W.; McVey, D.G.; Zhao, G.; Hu, J.; Poston, R.N.; Ren, M.; Willeit, K.; Coassin, S.; Willeit, J.; et al. FURIN Expression in Vascular Endothelial Cells Is Modulated by a Coronary Artery Disease–Associated Genetic Variant and Influences Monocyte Transendothelial Migration. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mbewe-Campbell, N.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, K.; Friese, R.S.; Mahata, M.; Schork, A.J.; Rao, F.; Chiron, S.; Biswas, N.; Kim, H.-S.; et al. Genes and environment. J. Hypertens. 2012, 30, 1961–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Netea, M.G.; Rovina, N.; Akinosoglou, K.; Antoniadou, A.; Antonakos, N.; Damoraki, G.; Gkavogianni, T.; Adami, M.-E.; Katsaounou, P.; et al. Complex Immune Dysregulation in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Respiratory Failure. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 992–1000.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Prabhu, S.S.; Chakraborty, T.T.; Kumar, N.; Banerjee, I. Association between IFITM3 rs12252 polymorphism and influenza susceptibility and severity: A meta-analysis. Gene 2018, 674, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cai, G.; Bossé, Y.; Xiao, F.; Kheradmand, F.; Amos, C.I. Tobacco smoking increases the lung gene expression of ACE2, the Receptor of SARS-CoV-2. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, 1557–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Leung, J.M.; Yang, C.X.; Tam, A.; Shaipanich, T.; Hackett, T.L.; Singhera, G.K.; Dorscheid, D.R.; Sin, D.D. ACE-2 expression in the small airway epithelia of smokers and COPD patients: Implications for COVID-19. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Patel, V.B.; Zhong, J.-C.; Grant, M.B.; Oudit, G.Y. Role of the ACE2/Angiotensin 1–7 Axis of the Renin–Angiotensin System in Heart Failure. Circ. Res. 2016, 118, 1313–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Rahimi, Z.; Moradi, M.; Nasri, H. A systematic review of the role of renin angiotensin aldosterone system genes in diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic neuropathy. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19. [Google Scholar]
  65. Bunyavanich, S.; Do, A.; Vicencio, A. Nasal Gene Expression of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Children and Adults. JAMA 2020, 323, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lingappan, K.; Karmouty-Quintana, H.; Davies, J.; Akkanti, B.; Harting, M.T. Understanding the age divide in COVID-19: Why are children overwhelmingly spared? Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2020, 319, L39–L44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zheng, Y.-Y.; Ma, Y.-T.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Xie, X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 259–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Yakala, G.K.; Cabrera-Fuentes, H.A.; Crespo-Avilan, G.E.; Rattanasopa, C.; Burlacu, A.; George, B.L.; Anand, K.; Mayan, D.C.; Corlianò, M.; Hernández-Reséndiz, S.; et al. FURIN Inhibition Reduces Vascular Remodeling and Atherosclerotic Lesion Progression in Mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ouyang, Y.; Yin, J.; Wang, W.; Shi, H.; Shi, Y.; Xu, B.; Qiao, L.; Feng, Y.; Pang, L.; Wei, F.; et al. Downregulated Gene Expression Spectrum and Immune Responses Changed During the Disease Progression in Patients With COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wan, S.; Yi, Q.; Fan, S.; Lv, J.; Zhang, X.; Guo, L.; Lang, C.; Xiao, Q.; Xiao, K.; Yi, Z.; et al. Relationships among lymphocyte subsets, cytokines, and the pulmonary inflammation index in coronavirus (COVID-19) infected patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 189, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liao, M.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, J.; Wen, Y.; Xu, G.; Zhao, J.; Cheng, L.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, F.; et al. Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 842–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Silvin, A.; Chapuis, N.; Dunsmore, G.; Goubet, A.G.; Dubuisson, A.; Derosa, L.; Almire, C.; Hénon, C.; Kosmider, O.; Droin, N.; et al. Elevated Calprotectin and Abnormal Myeloid Cell Subsets Discriminate Severe from Mild COVID-19. Cell 2020, 182, 1401–1418.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Blanco-Melo, D.; Nilsson-Payant, B.E.; Liu, W.C.; Uhl, S.; Hoagland, D.; Møller, R.; Jordan, T.X.; Oishi, K.; Panis, M.; Sachs, D.; et al. Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19. Cell 2020, 181, 1036–1045.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Mathew, D.; Giles, J.R.; Baxter, A.E.; Oldridge, D.A.; Greenplate, A.R.; Wu, J.E.; Alanio, C.; Kuri-Cervantes, L.; Pampena, M.B.; D’Andrea, K.; et al. Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications. Science (80-. ) 2020, 369, eabc8511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. DeBiasi, R.L.; Song, X.; Delaney, M.; Bell, M.; Smith, K.; Pershad, J.; Ansusinha, E.; Hahn, A.; Hamdy, R.; Harik, N.; et al. Severe Coronavirus Disease-2019 in Children and Young Adults in the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Region. J. Pediatr. 2020, 223, 199–203.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Nguyen, A.; David, J.K.; Maden, S.K.; Wood, M.A.; Weeder, B.R.; Nellore, A.; Thompson, R.F. Human Leukocyte Antigen Susceptibility Map for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Lei, X.; Dong, X.; Ma, R.; Wang, W.; Xiao, X.; Tian, Z.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Ren, L.; et al. Activation and evasion of type I interferon responses by SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Everitt, A.R.; Clare, S.; Pertel, T.; John, S.P.; Wash, R.S.; Smith, S.E.; Chin, C.R.; Feeley, E.M.; Sims, J.S.; Adams, D.J.; et al. IFITM3 restricts the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza. Nature 2012, 484, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zhou, Z.; Ren, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhong, J.; Xiao, Y.; Jia, Z.; Guo, L.; Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Jiang, S.; et al. Heightened Innate Immune Responses in the Respiratory Tract of COVID-19 Patients. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 27, 883–890.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, Q.; Bastard, P.; Liu, Z.; le Pen, J.; Moncada-Velez, M.; Chen, J.; Ogishi, M.; Sabli, I.K.D.; Hodeib, S.; Korol, C.; et al. Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science 2020, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bastard, P.; Rosen, L.B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Dorgham, K.; Béziat, V.; Puel, A.; Lorenzo, L.; Bizien, L.; Assant, S.; et al. Auto-antibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science 2020, 4585, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 09 00817 g001 550
Figure 1. Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pathogenesis. COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which primarily affects the respiratory tract causing bilateral pneumonia. Its transmission may occur through direct contact and respiratory droplets or aerosols, and through the ingestion of viral particles. COVID-19 also affects multiple organs, often leading to organ failure and death of the individual affected by the infection. Organic complications observed during the infectious process include those seen in the lungs, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal systems, among others. All of these contribute to the enormous morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Figure 1. Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pathogenesis. COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which primarily affects the respiratory tract causing bilateral pneumonia. Its transmission may occur through direct contact and respiratory droplets or aerosols, and through the ingestion of viral particles. COVID-19 also affects multiple organs, often leading to organ failure and death of the individual affected by the infection. Organic complications observed during the infectious process include those seen in the lungs, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal systems, among others. All of these contribute to the enormous morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Pathogens 09 00817 g001
Table
Table 1. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), tissue protease, and immune marker expression patterns involved in the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Table 1. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), tissue protease, and immune marker expression patterns involved in the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
ProteinSpeciesProtein Expression/ActivityVariant/PolymorphismPossible EffectReferences
ACE2Human-rs143936283 (E329G) and rs73635825 (S19P) allele variantmild to moderate COVID-19[50]
Human-high allele frequency in the QTL expression quantitative trait loci variants – associated with higher ACE2 expressionmild to moderate COVID-19[51]
Humanincreased lung expression-severe COVID-19[23,52]
Humanno expression alteration-mild to moderate COVID-19[13,53]
Humandecreased activity-severe COVID-19[54]
TMPRSS2Humanincreased activity-severe COVID-19[53]
FurinHuman-G allele of 1970C > Gsevere COVID-19[55]
Humanincreased expressionrs17514846 variantsevere COVID-19[56,57]
CatLHuman-proximal CTSL1 promoter at position C-171Asevere COVID-19[58]
HLA-DRHumanlow expression-severe COVID-19[59]
IFN-γHuman-rs12252-C/C in the gene IFITM3mild to severe COVID-19[30,60]
ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; CatL: cathepsin L; CTSL1: cathepsin L1; HLA-DR: human leukocyte antigen – DR isotype; IFITM3: interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3; IFN-γ: interferon gamma; TMPRSS2: transmembrane protease serine 2.
Table
Table 2. Immune profiles and disease outcomes in adults infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Table 2. Immune profiles and disease outcomes in adults infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Disease SeverityComplicationsImmune Response IntensityCellular Immune ResponseCytokine/Chemokine ResponsesDisease OutcomeReferences
Mild--peripheral blood: normal levels of CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, and NK cellsnormal plasma cytokine levels-[71]
--peripheral blood: low neutrophil counts (2.34 (1.2–2.81) × 109/L) and normal lymphocyte countsnormal plasma cytokine levels-[70]
--peripheral blood: low neutrophil and normal lymphocyte counts--[12]
fever, cough, diarrhea, myalgia, anosmia/ageusia-peripheral blood: increase of CD10LowCD101+ neutrophils, CD14HighCD16High monocytes, IFN-producing monocytes
BALF: increase of monocyte/macrophage counts		low CXCL8 and increased IFN-α plasma levels-[73]
Moderatepneumonia, hepatic failurehyperinflammationperipheral blood: normal lymphocyte counts, normal CD4+ and CD8+ cell countsincrease of plasma IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-18, CTACK, MIG, M-CSF, IL-10, IP-10, IFN-γrecovery[41]
-hyperinflammationBALF: CD14+ cells, high % of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, T and B lymphocytes and NK cellsincrease of BALF CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CXCL16recovery[72]
dyspnea and pneumonia-peripheral blood: low CD14LowCD16High monocyte countsincrease of plasma calprotectin-[73]
Severepneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, RNAemia, acute cardiac and kidney injury, secondary infection, shock, median systolic pressure of 145, respiratory rate > 24 breaths/min, increased pro-thrombin time and D-dimer levelhyperinflammationperipheral blood: high numbers of neutrophils: 10.6 (5.0–11.8) × 109/L, low lymphocyte counts: 0.4 (0.2–0.8) × 109/Lincrease of plasma levels of IL-2, IL-7, IL-10, GSCF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and TNFαincreased mortality[69]
pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, hepatic and kidney failure, cardiac failure, shockhyperinflammationperipheral blood: low % of neutrophils and lymphocytes, low counts of CD4+ (0.3 (0.2–0.4) × 109/L) and CD8+ cells (0.1 (0.1–0.2) × 109/L)increase of plasma IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-18, CTACK, MIG, MCP-3, M-CSF, MIP-1α, HGF, IL-10, IP-10, IFN-γincreased mortality[41]
acute respiratory distress syndromehyperinflammationperipheral blood: normal neutrophil counts, low % of lymphocytes and eosinophils, low counts of T cells (0.5 × 109/L), CD8+ cells (0.15 × 109/L) and regulatory T cellsincrease of serum IL-6, decrease of IL-8-[29]
acute respiratory distress syndromehyperinflammationBALF: increased % of neutrophils, reduced % of dendritic cells, presence of M1 and M2 macrophagesincrease of BALF IL-8, IL-6, IL-1β, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11increased mortality[72]
--peripheral blood: low numbers of CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, and NK cellsincrease of plasma IL-6-[71]
acute respiratory distress syndrome-peripheral blood: normal neutrophils, low CD4+ and CD8+ cell countsincrease of plasma IL-6-[70]
acute respiratory distress syndrome-peripheral blood: low lymphocyte CD8+ cell countsincrease of IL-6, IL-10, IL-2, and IFN-γ-[12]
-hyperinflammation-neglected production of IFNs, increase of lung (CCL2, CCL8,
and CCL11) and systemic (CCL2, CCL8 CXCL2, CXCL8, CXCL9, and CXCL16) chemokines, and systemic IL-6 and IL-1ra		-[74]
acute respiratory distress syndrome-peripheral blood: increase of total neutrophils, and CD10LowCD101− and CD10LowCD16Low neutrophil counts, low numbers of CD14LowCD16High monocytes, low frequencies of CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ cells, increase of ROS- and NO-producing monocytes
BALF: increase of ROS- and NO-producing monocytes/macrophages, accumulation of immature neutrophils		increase of plasma calprotectin, CXCL-8, CXCL-12, and IL-6 levels-[73]
BALF: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; CTACK: cutaneous T-cell-attracting chemokine; GSCF: granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; HGF: hepatocyte growth factor; IFN-γ: interferon gamma; IL-10: interleukin 10; IL-18: interleukin 18; IL-1ra: interleukin-1 receptor antagonist; IL-2: interleukin 2; IL-6: interleukin 6; IL-7: interleukin 7; IP-10: interferon gamma-induced protein 10; MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MCP-3: monocyte chemotactic protein-3; M-CSF: macrophage colony-stimulating factor; MIG: monokine induced by interferon gamma; MIP-1α: macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha; NK: natural killer; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor alpha.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mulinari Turin de Oliveira, N.; Fernandes da Silva Figueiredo, I.; Cristine Malaquias da Silva, L.; Sauruk da Silva, K.; Regis Bueno, L.; Barbosa da Luz, B.; Rita Corso, C.; Paula Werner, M.F.; Soares Fernandes, E.; Maria-Ferreira, D. Tissue Proteases and Immune Responses: Influencing Factors of COVID-19 Severity and Mortality. Pathogens 2020, 9, 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100817

AMA Style

Mulinari Turin de Oliveira N, Fernandes da Silva Figueiredo I, Cristine Malaquias da Silva L, Sauruk da Silva K, Regis Bueno L, Barbosa da Luz B, Rita Corso C, Paula Werner MF, Soares Fernandes E, Maria-Ferreira D. Tissue Proteases and Immune Responses: Influencing Factors of COVID-19 Severity and Mortality. Pathogens. 2020; 9(10):817. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mulinari Turin de Oliveira, Natália, Isabella Fernandes da Silva Figueiredo, Liziane Cristine Malaquias da Silva, Karien Sauruk da Silva, Laryssa Regis Bueno, Bruna Barbosa da Luz, Cláudia Rita Corso, Maria Fernanda Paula Werner, Elizabeth Soares Fernandes, and Daniele Maria-Ferreira. 2020. "Tissue Proteases and Immune Responses: Influencing Factors of COVID-19 Severity and Mortality" Pathogens 9, no. 10: 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9100817

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop