Next Article in Journal
Phylogenetic Analyses of Rotavirus A from Cattle in Uruguay Reveal the Circulation of Common and Uncommon Genotypes and Suggest Interspecies Transmission
Next Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Mixed Biofilms of Candida albicans and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Positively Charged Silver Nanoparticles and Functionalized Silicone Elastomers
Previous Article in Journal
Seroprevalence of Hepatitis E Virus in Forestry Workers from Trentino-Alto Adige Region (Northern Italy)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Examination of Viral Characteristics of HIV-1 CRF07_BC and Its Potential Interaction with Extracellular Galectin-3
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbial Etiology and Prevention of Dental Caries: Exploiting Natural Products to Inhibit Cariogenic Biofilms

1
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
2
Hanmi Natural Nutrition Co., LTD 44-20, Tongil-ro 1888 beon-gil, Munsan, Paju, Gyeonggi 10808, Korea
3
H-FOOD, 108-66, 390 gil, Jingun Oh Nam-Ro, Nam Yang, Ju-Shi, Gyung Gi-Do 12041, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(7), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070569
Submission received: 20 May 2020 / Revised: 8 July 2020 / Accepted: 10 July 2020 / Published: 14 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Interactions during Infection)

Abstract

:
Dental caries is one of the most common microbe-mediated oral diseases in human beings. At present, the accepted etiology of caries is based on a four-factor theory that includes oral microorganisms, oral environment, host, and time. Excessive exposure to dietary carbohydrates leads to the accumulation of acid-producing and acid-resistant microorganisms in the mouth. Dental caries is driven by dysbiosis of the dental biofilm adherent to the enamel surface. Effective preventive methods include inhibiting the cariogenic microorganisms, treatment with an anti-biofilm agent, and sugar intake control. The goal is to reduce the total amount of biofilm or the levels of specific pathogens. Natural products could be recommended for preventing dental caries, since they may possess fewer side effects in comparison with synthetic antimicrobials. Herein, the mechanisms of oral microbial community development and functional specialization are discussed. We highlight the application of widely explored natural products in the last five years for their ability to inhibit cariogenic microorganisms.

1. Introduction

The human body is home to trillions of microbes, and the oral cavity is one of the largest sources of microbes. There are around 700 to 1000 microbial species that colonize the human mouth. The occurrence and development of oral diseases such as dental caries, periodontal disease, and oral cancer are closely related to oral microorganisms [1,2,3,4]. Meanwhile, oral microorganisms can enter the blood circulatory system through a damaged oral mucosa and cause a rise of systemic antibody levels thereby increasing the risk of a variety of cardiovascular diseases [2]. Peres et al. evaluated the societal relevance of preventing and addressing oral diseases worldwide; the direct costs of dental diseases were estimated at $356.80 billion and the indirect costs at $187.61 billion in 2015 alone [3]. The three diseases with the highest direct and indirect costs of prevention and treatment worldwide in 2015 could be ranked as follows: diabetes (€119 billion) > cardiovascular diseases (€111 billion) > dental diseases (€90) billion.
Dental disease is undoubtedly a public health problem and is among the most prevalent diseases globally, in particular, dental caries which is a biofilm-associated disease [5]. The World Health Organization reported that 60 to 90%of school children and nearly 100% of adults worldwide are suffering from cavities [6]. Therefore, the prevention of caries plays an important role in public health management. Federation Dentaire Internationale (FDI) presented the minimal intervention dentistry definition on managing dental caries in 2002, emphasizing that the existing preventive measure is to maintain a healthy tooth structure as much as possible [7]. With the recent recommendation for early detection and monitoring of caries, rather than waiting until a cavity is formed, the prevention of caries was shifted from the surgical model to a medical model, and the proportion of individuals receiving preventive oral health care has been increasing in recent years [8]. Preventing caries preserves a sound tooth structure, prevents the demineralization of enamel, and promotes natural healing processes [9]. Caries risk assessment contributes to determining the specific protective factors against dental caries and the need for therapeutic intervention. John Featherstone et al. pointed out that disease indicators such as ‘bad bacteria’, absence of saliva, and poor dietary habits are determinants of caries. They demonstrated that saliva, sealants, antibacterials, fluoride, and a controlled diet can contribute to keeping the teeth healthy, and each of the above strategies alone can be used to prevent dental caries [10]. The Alliance for a Cavity-Free Future has proposed steps to prevent dental caries, which include balancing the levels of oral bacteria, controlling the consumption of sugary and starchy foods, strengthening the demineralized enamel though fluoridated products [11]. Improvement of the oral flora is one of the effective strategies to prevent dental caries. In this study, we discuss the prevention of caries through the inhibition of dental biofilms. The oral biofilm formed by cariogenic (that is, pathogenic) microorganisms is a complex microbial community in the mouth. Numerous studies have reported that the difference between pathogenic biofilms and non-pathogenic biofilms corresponds to the proportion of cariogenic microorganisms [12]. The accumulation of pathogenic biofilm is one of the main causes of dental caries. Therefore, agents with anti-biofilm properties have been proven to be effective in preventing dental caries [13]. We here describe strategies used for controlling cariogenic microorganisms.

1.1. Chemical Agents

In recent years, many chemical agents have been reported to have effects on the metabolism of bacteria and the adherence of bacterial cells. Some, such as chlorhexidine [14,15,16,17], delmopinol [17,18], and triclosan [19], have shown potent inhibitory activities against the development and maturation of biofilm. It is generally believed that the mechanism of chlorhexidine bactericidal activity is the destruction of the serosa permeability barrier against bacterial cells. Low concentrations of this agent can lead to partial cytoplasmic leakage, while high concentrations cause cytoplasm condensation and denaturation and, thus, sterilization. Fluorides such as amine fluoride [20,21], sodium fluoride [21], and stannous fluoride [22] act as powerful agents in the prevention of dental caries. Free fluoride ions in sodium fluoride may interfere with bacterial metabolism through bacterial cell membranes [23]. Amine fluoride is a cationic antimicrobial compound with unclear mode of action [22]. It is suggested that amine fluorides bind to the surfaces of bacterial cells and disturb the stability of the bacterial membrane [20].
However, chemical agents may cause considerable side effects [24,25]. The limited penetration of antimicrobial agents may restrict their inhibitory effects on cariogenic microorganisms. Also, the concentration of agents and the duration of exposure affect their anti-caries efficiency [26]. A high concentration of chemical agents can unbalance the oral flora and have adverse side effects such as vomiting, diarrhea, mucosal desquamation [27], and tooth staining [28]. Therefore, exploiting alternative natural products as preventive measures for dental caries could be promising for dental caring.

1.2. Natural Products, Plant Extracts, and Probiotics

Clinical trials have proved the effectiveness of several natural compounds in the treatment of dental caries, among which catechol, emetine, quinine, and flavone are the most reported [29,30]. Phytochemicals isolated from plants that can be used as effective and economical treatments are needed [31]. However, many plant products such as herbs and spices show toxicity to cells, and hence, cytotoxicity tests and dose controls are needed for their safe use [32]. According to the randomized controlled clinical trial of Usha et al. (2017), a 0.5% extract of Stevia rebaudiana leaves reduced cariogenic organisms significantly and promoted the buffering capacity of the saliva in patients at high for caries [33]. In recent years, researches on probiotics beneficial for the buccal cavity have been increasing. It is reported that certain probiotics can inhibit cariogenic microorganisms by the production of microcin [34], hydrogen peroxide [35], and bacteriocins [36]. Rodríguez et al. (2016) compared milk supplemented with probiotic lactobacilli with standard milk for their effects of high patients at risk for caries. The results showed that group receiving the probiotic had less new lesions than the standard milk group, demonstrating the possible use of probiotic lactobacilli for caries control [37]. This review aims to present the characteristics of the cariogenic biofilm, as well as to summarize systematically the application of probiotics and plants including herbs and spices for the prevention of caries in the past five years and explain their mechanism of action, as a reference for further research in the area of dental caries prevention.

2. Supragingival Microbial Biofilms and Dental Caries

2.1. Oral Microbiota

In 1890, Miller first proposed the “chemical bacteria theory” for the occurrence of dental caries in the book titled “Microbes in the human mouth” [38], suggesting that the dental biofilm is composed of microorganisms. Oral microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, viruses, mycoplasmas, protozoa, and archaea form a heterogeneous ecological system in the mouth, which is known as oral microbiota [39,40]. The oral cavity presents a warm and nutritious environment for the oral microbiota and, at the same time, it controls bacterial colonization to avoid invading pathogenic microbes. The oral microbiota plays a critical role in maintaining oral health [41]. However, under certain conditions, invading microorganisms cause an imbalance of the host’s commensal microbial community, which results in dental disease.

2.2. Dental Biofilms

The oral microbiota on teeth surface tends to form polymicrobial communities, known as dental biofilm [42]. It is now clear that the matrix of extracellular polymers (EPS) provides a pathological habitat for cariogenic microorganisms. A large body of evidence indicates that dental caries is essentially a biofilm-induced disease, rather than an infectious disease [43], and the disease process begins in the biofilm that covers the surface of the tooth [5]. Caries biofilm (biofilm that may cause caries) is an extremely active and complicated ecosystem, rich in EPS (Figure 1). The formation of the biofilm begins when a salivary glycoprotein film (called dental pellicle) coats a tooth surface [20]. Gram-positive bacteria including streptococci of the mitis [44] and mutans species [45] (which are considered as initial colonizers of the biofilm) then form EPS, which enhance the adherence of other organisms. Emerging evidence shows that acid-producing bacterial species of the genera Veillonella [46], Scardovia [47], Lactobacillus [48], and Propionibacterium [49] could be present in the dental biofilm as colonizers and may induce in cariogenic conditions in the mouth.
The EPS provide new binding sites for other acid-producing microorganisms and enhance their virulence [44]. Early studies focused on the microbial composition of cariogenic biofilms, but it is now being increasingly recognized that the structural and biochemical properties of EPS play important roles in the etiology of caries [50]. The matrix of EPS provides protection and mechanical stability, making the biofilm recalcitrant to antimicrobials and difficult to remove. The microbes are embedded in a substrate of EPS and constantly produce acids that are physically protected from the rapid buffering of saliva [51]. The studies on caries have focused on microbial behavior in biofilm communities using experimental biofilm models that can simulate the metabolic processes during carbohydrate exposure in the mouth and assessing the dose–response sensitivity of anti-caries agents [43]. In other words, this strategy can help to investigate the cariogenicity of dietary sugars and to evaluate the anti-caries effects of substances in vitro [52].
Streptococcus mutans biofilm has been largely accepted to have cariogenic potential [53,54] which depends on three core attributes: (i) acid production, (ii) acid resistance—which makes it able not only to metabolize a wide range of carbohydrates into organic acids but also to thrive under low pH conditions [55]—and (iii) the ability to synthesize EPS, which can be seen as a growth-promoting process, providing protection for cells and thus allowing them to survive in harsh environments [56]. Three glucosyltransferases (GtfBCD) are matrix-producing enzymes of S. mutans that are involved in the establishment of a cariogenic biofilm [57]. However, as the science of prevention and treatment of dental caries has evolved, it has become clear that simply targeting S. mutans and limiting sugar intake is not sufficient to prevent caries. The major EPS components in cariogenic biofilms are polysaccharides, particularly S. mutans-derived glucans as well as soluble glucans and fructans produced by other species (e.g., Actinomyces, Streptococcus salivarius, and Streptococcus gordonii) [47,50]. Recent molecular analyses have revealed the presence of a pathogenic flora that includes bacteria different from streptococci (e.g., Scardovia and Actinomyces) and fungi (e.g., Candida albicans) [58,59]. In addition to S. mutans, Lactobacillus [48], Bifidobacterium [60], and Scardovia species [47] are also considered as caries-associated colonizers. Data from previous studies have suggested that the susceptibility of biofilms to antibiotics, preservatives, or anti-adhesion compounds is closely related to microbial diversity [61,62,63]. Due to the strong competitiveness of cariogenic microorganisms, microbial abundance decreases during the maturation of cariogenic biofilms [50]. The etiology of caries is attributed to the dominance of cariogenic microorganisms over health-associated commensal species. Thus, challenges for the prevention of dental caries are posed by the complexity of the biofilm matrix as well as the abundance of microorganisms.

2.3. Microbial Etiology of Dental Caries

At present, it is accepted that dental caries result from a complex interaction between acid-producing microorganisms and fermentable carbohydrates over time [40]. Although the oral microbiome influences the formation of dental caries, many host factors including teeth and saliva also affect caries development, leading to a disease that tends to be chronic and slowly progressive (Figure 2.). The dental biofilm is an important component in the etiology of dental caries. The complexity of the matrix, the transfer of resistance genes, as well as the physical protection provided by EPS are risk factors for caries. Numerous studies have reported that controlling the dental biofilm is the key to preventing tooth decay [64]; additional challenges are posed by the lack of a single obvious target for therapeutic intervention and by the poor retention of locally administered treatments [44].

3. Recent Advances in Natural Antimicrobial Compounds for the Prevention of Dental Caries

3.1. Plant-Derived Cariogenic Biofilm Inhibitors

There has been a growing interest in plants that are rich in natural antimicrobial compounds [65]. Folk dental practitioners have realized the importance of medicinal plants as effective providers of drugs. Some plants lacking unwanted side effects have even shown higher efficiency than synthetic drugs in the inhibition of dental caries [66]. The World Health Organization has reported that about 80% of the world’s population rely on herbal products to treat some diseases [67], and most of the herbal medicines contain at least one botanical molecule [68]. It is worth mentioning that the bioactivity, and bioavailability of phytochemicals have been explored widely [53,66]. According to the research of Malvania et al. (2019), a licorice extract produced a significantly higher inhibitory effect on oral pathogens when compared to sodium fluoride [66]. Fluid or dry plant extracts are added to oral caring products, such as toothpaste, mouthwash, and oral care functional food, to enhance their anti-caries properties [69]. Meanwhile, plant ingredients are also used while filling cavities to treat caries pain [70]. Most of the antibacterial substances in plants are secondary metabolites that are not necessary for plant growth but have special physiological functions. They usually include alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, and organic acids [71]. Research on the mechanisms of the anti-caries action of plant-derived compounds, as well as on their biological effects on the host, is still required. Over the years, plants have been used as natural therapies beneficial to oral health, some of them having antibacterial properties and reducing infections [72]. Another action of anti-caries compounds is the inhibition of glucosyltransferase (which plays a key role in the synthesis of water-insoluble glucan) to prevent the formation of cariogenic biofilms [73,74]. It is necessary to investigate plant extracts, which contain many different bioactive compounds. Researches have indicated that cinnamon, clove, and coriander are effective in preventing dental caries [75]. The antimicrobial activity of phenolic acids is related to the number and position of substituents on the benzene ring. The saturation and length of the side chains may influence the antimicrobial potential against oral pathogens [76]. One of the probable antibacterial mechanisms of xanthorrhizol was found to be the formation of hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups in xanthorrhizol and proteins in the cell membrane. The hydroxyl groups bind to the cell membrane of C. albicans, affecting its membrane permeability and eventually leading to cell lysis [77]. It is, however, known that one of the mechanisms of the antimicrobial action of alkaloids is the suppression of the pathogen cytokinesis. Polyphenols are known to play a role in the inactivation of cellular enzymes in pathogens [78,79]. More studies are, however, required to unveil more details about the mechanism of action of anti-caries bioactive compounds. In addition to their antibacterial activity, plants often possess natural antioxidants due to the presence of polyphenols and flavonoids [32]. Natural plants can be an adjunct therapy to mechanical dental biofilm control. Whole or specific parts of various plants have been used in the prevention of dental biofilm formation and could reduce the high global incidence of dental caries. Some trials regarding plants, listed in Table 1, have achieved favorable outcomes for dental caries prevention.

3.1.1. Effect on Bacterial Growth

Bioactive compounds from plants have been examined for their ability to inhibit the growth of cariogenic microorganisms [78,87,88,89,90]. An essential oil has been demonstrated to have pharmacological properties such as antibacterial potential [91]. Many plant extracts with complex chemical composition, including alkaloids, avonoids, isoavonoids, tannins, cumarins, glycosides, terpens, phenolic, phenylpropanol, monoterpenaldehyde, and monoterpene alcohol, can be used for caries prevention purposes [92]. Bodiba et al. (2018) demonstrated the possible future use of the extract of Pongamia pinnata, Azadirachta indica, Psidium guajava, and Mangifera indica for the prevention of dental caries. These researchers tested the antibacterial activity of the herbs mentioned above against S. mutans using a microdilution method. Using the checkerboard method to measure the synergistic ability of the herbs, they proved the important role of herbs in dentistry [32]. Phytochemicals isolated from certain herbs used in traditional medicine have been proposed as potential alternatives against cariogenic microbes that cause dental caries [90]. Antimicrobial agents including lipophilic alkylamides present in various herbs have been studied in clinical trials [93]. Also, other antimicrobial compounds in herbal medicines have been shown to display antimicrobial activity against oral pathogens, as well as prevent the release of histamine and the accumulation of cariogenic microorganisms on teeth surface.

3.1.2. Alteration of Initial Adhesion, Aggregation, and Integrity

The first step against biofilm formation is the use of biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers to change the physical and chemical properties of the cell surface, thereby weakening the adhesion of microorganisms. Glycyrrhizin inhibits the adherence of S. mutans by affecting the activity of glucosyltransferase. The mechanisms of the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm actions of glycosides can involve the inhibition of Sortase A and Sortase A-mediated aggregation of S. mutans [84,85]. Padma hepaten is a traditional Tibetan medicine that contains an efficient polyphenolic formula derived from several herbs. Padma hepaten bioactive compounds act by reducing the cariogenic biofilm via the downregulation of the genes (gtfB, gtfC, and ftf) that code for EPS [74]. Janakiram et al. (2020) compared herbal toothpastes with non-herbal toothpastes by searching databases of randomized controlled trials and found that herbal toothpastes were superior to the non-herbal toothpastes in dental biofilm reduction [94].

3.1.3. Modulation of Bacterial Quorum Sensing

Quorum sensing (QS) is a key regulator of virulence in cariogenic biofilms. Biofilm formation is based on the signal-mediated QS system. Plant extracts can inhibit QS genes and QS-controlled factors and interfere with biofilm accumulation. They can also target several pathways of bacterial metabolism. Choi, H. et al. (2017) found that Camellia japonica and Thuja orientalis methanolic extracts have potential anti-quorum-sensing abilities against oral pathogens [78]. When Philip, Nebu, et al. (2019) investigated the effects of cranberry extracts on the virulence of S. mutansC. albicans biofilms, the results showed that polyphenol-rich cranberry extracts significantly reduced the acidogenicity and metabolic activity of these biofilms [59].

3.2. Microbial Cariogenic Biofilm Inhibitors—Probiotics

Since the solubilization of tooth minerals by microbial metabolic acids is irreversible, and treatment without prevention is not sustainable [95], there has been increasing interest in the possible effects of probiotics on the prevention of dental caries in the past few years [96]. The development and evaluation of probiotics and probiotics containing oral symbiosis products will be an important topic for the management of dental caries in the future [97,98].
Probiotics are live microorganisms that are beneficial to the host by colonizing the human body when administered in adequate amount [99]. Probiotics can change the composition of the microbial communities in a certain organ or tissue of the host [100]. Homeostasis and dysbiosis of oral microbial communities ultimately lead to health or disease, respectively [62]. However, it is difficult for exogenous probiotic bacteria to colonize in the established oral microbiota [101]. Therefore, overcoming the limitations to probiotic colonization in the oral cavity is a challenge. Bacteria naturally present in the mouth can show dual probiotic effects, inhibit the growth of cariogenic species, as well as modify the pH of the oral environment [102,103,104]. The most widely researched probiotics, i.e., Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis, Bifidobacterium lactis, have been investigated, and their capacity to reduce cariogenic pathogen count and control plaque pH has been assessed [98]. In recent years, L. rhamnosus, L. reuteri, and B. lactis have been examined in clinical trials after incorporation in dental caring products, such as tablets, lozenges, and chewing gums. Their mechanism of anti-caries action is competition for essential nutrients [97]. Meanwhile, the production of antibacterial factors including bacteriocin, organic acids, and hydrogen peroxide can protect the host from the overgrowth of pathogens [105]. Bacteriocins such as nisin, pediocin, and reuterine are known bioactive compounds produced by various probiotic strains, which are effective against oral pathogens [106]. Recent findings related to probiotic achieving favorable outcomes in dental caries prevention are listed in Table 2

3.3. Incorporation of Natural Antimicrobials in Caries

The incorporation of natural products in treatments for the prevention of caries might reduce the therapeutic costs, while causing minimal side effects. However, in vivo toxicity studies and clinical trials are still necessary. The studies carried out in recent decades have confirmed the anti-caries role of probiotics and natural compounds extracted from herbs and spices [75]. Their main action is based in three effects: reduce bacterial growth rate, reduce the adhesion ability of pathogens, and inhibit the enzymatic activity of glucosyltransferase and amylase [72,73,88]. The treatment with a single natural product dose—dependently inhibited the cariogenic biofilm, while plant extracts in combination with probiotics demonstrated synergistic effects. Ping et al. (2008) reported that the combination of green tea extract and probiotics produced a more significant pathogen reduction than probiotics or plant extracts used separately [111]. Wang et al. (2019) demonstrated that the cooperative fermentation of probiotics and a Chinese herbal medicine had a synergistic antifungal effect [83]. A synergistic antibacterial effect was observed by combining Azadirachta indica, Pongamia pinnata, Psidium guajava, and Mangifera indica against S. mutans [32]. In another study, a combination of gingerol and allicin produced a great antimicrobial action [83]. To control both effectiveness and safety, the relationship between the oral environment and the anti-microbial activity of bioactive compounds, as well as the synergistic/antagonistic effects of natural antimicrobials, still need to be explored in details.

4. Conclusion and Future Perspective

The present article reveals that natural antimicrobial agents such as probiotics, herbs, and spices appear to be effective in controlling dental caries. Dental caring products containing extracts of natural plants have been on the market for many years. Also, probiotics not only serve as potential antimicrobial agents but also maintain the stability of the oral ecosystem. This review suggests that individual treatments using single herbal products or probiotics act on distinct targets; therefore, it may be more effective to combine several plants or to combine plants with probiotics. The development of functional products combining probiotics and polyphenol extracts could be an interesting research direction in the food industry [112]. Herein, we summarized the application of plant-derived natural products and microbial products for caries prevention in the recent five years and discussed the antimicrobial properties of natural products. In the future, the synergy between natural plants and microbial products must be targeted to help define novel, effective, and safe anti-caries strategies. However, efficient clinical studies are necessary for the discovery of their biofilm-interfering or -inhibiting activities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: X.C., E.B.-M.D., and D.-H.O.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation: X.C.; Writing—Review & Editing, X.C. and E.B.-M.D.; Formal analysis: N.K., J.-R.K.; D.-H.O., and D.Y.; Supervision, D.-H.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Brain Korea (BK) 21 Plus Project Korean Government, South Korea: 22A20153713433.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Brain Korea (BK) 21 Plus Project (Grant No. 22A20153713433) funded by the Korean Government, South Korea. The authors would like to thank the Central laboratory of Kangwon National University for training and technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stsepetova, J.; Truu, J.; Runnel, R.; Nommela, R.; Saag, M.; Olak, J.; Nolvak, H.; Preem, J.K.; Oopkaup, K.; Krjutskov, K.; et al. Impact of polyols on oral microbiome of Estonian schoolchildren. BMC Oral Health 2019, 19, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Karoly, M.; Gabor, N.; Adam, N.; Andrea, B. Characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of the most common bacterial diseases of the oral cavity. Orvosi Hetilap 2019, 160, 739–746. [Google Scholar]
  3. Peres, M.A.; Macpherson, L.M.D.; Weyant, R.J.; Daly, B.; Venturelli, R.; Mathur, M.R.; Listl, S.; Celeste, R.K.; Guarnizo-Herreno, C.C.; Kearns, C.; et al. Oral diseases: A global public health challenge. Lancet 2019, 394, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mosaddad, S.A.; Tahmasebi, E.; Yazdanian, A.; Rezvani, M.B.; Seifalian, A.; Yazdanian, M.; Tebyanian, H. Oral microbial biofilms: An update. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 2005–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yadav, K.; Prakash, S. Dental Caries: A microbiological approach. J. Clin. Infect. Dis. Pract. 2017, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oral Health Database. Available online: https://www.mah.se/CAPP/ (accessed on 14 April 2020).
  7. Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) for Managing Dental Caries. Available online: https://www.fdiworlddental.org/resources/policy-statements-and-resolutions/minimal-intervention-dentistry-mid-for-managing-dental (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  8. Yon, M.J.Y.; Gao, S.S.; Chen, K.J. Medical model in caries management. J. Dent. 2019, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Al-Maliky, M.A.; Frentzen, M.; Meister, J. Laser-assisted prevention of enamel caries: A 10-year review of the literature. Laser Med. Sci. 2019, 35, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Featherstone, J.D.; Domejean-Orliaguet, S.; Jenson, L.; Wolff, M.; Young, D.A. Caries risk assessment in practice for age 6 through adult. CDA 2007, 35, 703. [Google Scholar]
  11. What is Caries? Available online: https://www.acffglobal.org/for-patients/what-is-caries/ (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  12. Do Nascimento, C.; Pita, M.S.; de Souza Santos, E.; Monesi, N.; Pedrazzi, V.; de Albuquerque Junior, R.F.; Ribeiro, R.F. Microbiome of titanium and zirconia dental implants abutments. Dent. Mater. 2016, 32, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Takenaka, S.; Ohsumi, T.; Noiri, Y. Evidence-based strategy for dental biofilms: Current evidence of mouthwashes on dental biofilm and gingivitis. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2019, 55, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Camargo, L.; Silva, S.N.; Chambrone, L. Efficacy of toothbrushing procedures performed in intensive care units in reducing the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review. J. Periodont. Res. 2019, 54, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Daubert, D.M.; Weinstein, B.F. Biofilm as a risk factor in implant treatment. Periodontol. 2000 2019, 81, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ferreira, J.C.C.; Marre, A.T.D.; Almeida, J.S.D.; Lobo, L.A.; Farah, A.; Valenca, A.M.G. Treatment of dental biofilm with a tincture of Bauhinia forficata leaves: An ex-vivo study. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 3432–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Collaerf, B.; Attstrom, R.; De Bruyn, H.; Moverl, R. The effect of delmopinol rinsing on dental plaque formation and gingivitis healing. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1992, 19, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Neilands, J.; Troedsson, U.; Sjodin, T.; Davies, J.R. The effect of delmopinol and fluoride on acid adaptation and acid production in dental plaque biofilms. Arch. Oral Biol. 2014, 59, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stewart, B.; Shibli, T.A.; Araujo, M.; Figuciredo, L.C.; Panagakos, F.; Matarazzo, F.; Mairink, R.; Onuma, T.; Faveri, M.; Retamal-Valdes, B.; et al. Effects of a toothpaste containing 0.3% triclosan on periodontal parameters of subjects enrolled in a regular maintenance program: A secondary analysis of a 2-year randomized clinical trial. J. Periodont. 2020, 91, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mei, H.C.; Engels, E.; Vries, J.; Busscher, H.J. Effects of amine fluoride on biofilm growth and salivary pellicles. Caries Res. 2008, 42, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  21. Naumova, E.A.; Weber, L.; Pankratz, V.; Czenskowski, V.; Arnold, W.H. Bacterial viability in oral biofilm after tooth brushing with amine fluoride or sodium fluoride. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 97, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Madléna, M.; Dombi, C.; Gintner, Z.; Bánóczy, J. Effect of amine fluoride/stannous fluoride toothpaste and mouthrinse on dental plaque accumulation and gingival health. Oral Dis. 2004, 10, 294–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaufmann, M.; Bartholmes, P. Purification, characterization and inhibition by fluoride of enolase from Streptococcus mutans DSM320523. Caries Res. 1992, 26, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sakaue, Y.; Takenaka, S.; Ohsumi, T.; Domon, H.; Terao, Y.; Noiri, Y. The effect of chlorhexidine on dental calculus formation: An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2018, 18, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Prabakar, J.; John, J.; Arumugham, M.; Kumar, P. Go natural, say no to chemicals—A systematic review on effectiveness of green tea extract containing formulations on dental caries. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2019, 12, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Watson, P.S.; Pontefract, H.A.; Devine, D.A.; Shore, R.C.; Nattress, B.R.; Kirkham, J.; Robinson, C. Penetration of fluoride into natural plaque biofilms. J. Dent. Res. 2005, 84, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cao, X.; Ye, Q.; Fan, M.; Liu, C. Antimicrobial effects of the ginsenoside Rh2 on monospecies and multispecies cariogenic biofilms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 740–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sharma, D.; Jain, A.; Ahuja, S.; Sachdeva, P. Role of plant extract in the inhibition of dental caries. Int. J. Life Sci. Pharma Res. 2018, 8, L9–L23. [Google Scholar]
  29. Salehi, B.; López, M.D.; Martínez-López, S.; Victoriano, M.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Martorell, M.F.; Rodrigues, C.; Martins, N. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni bioactive effects: From in vivo to clinical trials towards future therapeutic approaches. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 2904–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chauhan, D.N.; Singh, P.R.; Shah, K.; Chauhan, N.S. Natural oral care in dental therapy: Current and future prospects. Nat. Oral Care Dent. Ther. 2020, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Farid, A.B.; Omar, A.Z. Natural products for dental caries prevention. J. Med. Food 2004, 7, 381–384. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bodiba, D.C.; Prasad, P.; Srivastava, A.; Crampton, B.; Lall, N.S. Antibacterial activity of Azadirachta indica, Pongamia pinnata, Psidium guajava, and Mangifera indica and their mechanism of action against Streptococcus mutans. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2018, 14, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Usha, C.; Ramarao, S.; John, B.; Babu, M. Anticariogenicity of Stevia rebaudiana extract when used as a mouthwash in high caries risk patients: Randomized controlled clinical trial. World 2017, 8, 364–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zschüttig, A.; Zimmermann, K.; Blom, J.; Goesmann, A.; Pöhlmann, C.; Gunzer, F. Identification and characterization of microcin S, a new antibacterial peptide produced by probiotic Escherichia coli G3/10. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Waghmode, M.; Gunjal, A.; Patil, N. Probiotic sugar confectionery fortified with flax seeds (Linum usitatissimum L.). J. Food Sci. Tech. 2020, 57, 1964–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Goel, A.; Halami, P.M.; Tamang, J.P. Genome Analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from some indian fermented foods for bacteriocin production and probiotic marker genes. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rodríguez, G.; Ruiz, B.; Faleiros, S.; Vistoso, A.; Marró, M.; Sánchez, J.; Urzúa, I.; Cabello, R. Probiotic compared with standard milk for high-caries children: A cluster randomized trial. J. Dent. Res. 2016, 95, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Miller, W.D. The Micro-Organisms of the Human Mouth: The Local and General Diseases Which are Caused by Them; The S.S. White Dental Mfg.Co.: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1890; pp. 274–341. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lu, M.; Xuan, S.; Wang, Z. Oral microbiota: A new view of body health. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2019, 8, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pitts, N.B.; Zero, D.T.; Marsh, P.D.; Ekstrand, K.; Weintraub, J.A.; Ramos-Gomez, F.; Tagami, J.; Twetman, S.; Tsakos, G.; Ismail, A. Dental caries. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Razi, M.A.; Qamar, S.; Singhal, A.; Mahajan, A.; Siddiqui, S.; Minz, R.S.M. Role of natural salivary defenses in the maintenance of healthy oral microbiota in children and adolescents. J. Family Med. Prim. Care 2020, 9, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Marsh, P.; Zaura, E. Dental biofilm: Ecological interactions in health and disease. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, S12–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sim, C.P.C.; Dashper, S.G.; Reynolds, E.C. Oral microbial biofilm models and their application to the testing of anticariogenic agents. J. Dent. 2016, 50, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lamont, R.J.; Koo, H.; Hajishengallis, G. The oral microbiota: Dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 745–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seminario, A.; Broukal, Z.; Ivancakova, R. Mutans streptococci and the development of dental plaque. Prague Med. Rep. 2005, 106, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Widyarman, A.S.; Theodorea, C.F. Effect of reuterin on dual-species biofilm in vitro of Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella parvula. J. Int. Dent. 2019, 12, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  47. Fakhruddin, K.S.; Ngo, H.C.; Samaranayake, L.P. Cariogenic microbiome and microbiota of the early primary dentition: A contemporary overview. Oral Dis. 2019, 25, 982–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, J.-f.; Hsu, C.-L.; Chen, L.-R. Correlation between salivary mutans streptococci, lactobacilli and the severity of early childhood caries. J. Dent. Sci. 2019, 14, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Obata, J.; Fujishima, K.; Nagata, E.; Oho, T. Pathogenic mechanisms of cariogenic Propionibacterium acidifaciens. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 105, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bowen, W.H.; Burne, R.A.; Wu, H.; Koo, H. Oral biofilms: Pathogens, matrix, and polymicrobial interactions in microenvironments. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Amaechi, B.T.; Tenuta, L.M.A.; Ricomini Filho, A.P.; Cury, J.A. Protocols to study dental caries in vitro: Microbial caries models. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1922, 357–368. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ccahuana-Vasquez, R.A.; Cury, J.A. S. mutans biofilm model to evaluate antimicrobial substances and enamel demineralization. Braz. Oral Res. 2010, 24, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Alshahrani, A.M.; Gregory, R.L. In vitro Cariostatic effects of cinnamon water extract on nicotine-induced Streptococcus mutans biofilm. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhang, Q.X.; Qin, S.J.; Huang, Y.; Xu, X.Y.; Zhao, J.X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Inhibitory and preventive effects of Lactobacillus plantarum FB-T9 on dental caries in rats. J. Oral Microbiol. 2020, 12, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Abranches, J.; Zeng, L.; Kajfasz, J.K.; Palmer, S.; Chakraborty, B.; Wen, Z.Z.; Richards, V.P.; Brady, L.J.; Lemos, J.A. Biology of oral streptococci. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Palmer, S.R.; Ren, Z.; Hwang, G.; Liu, Y.; Combs, A.; Söderström, B.; Lara Vasquez, P.; Khosravi, Y.; Brady, L.J.; Koo, H.; et al. Streptococcus mutans yidC1 and yidC2 impact cell envelope biogenesis, the biofilm matrix, and biofilm biophysical properties. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Zhang, Q.; Nijampatnam, B.; Hua, Z.; Nguyen, T.; Zou, J.; Cai, X.; Michalek, S.M.; Velu, S.E.; Wu, H. Structure-based discovery of small molecule inhibitors of cariogenic virulence. Sci. Rep-Uk. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Elgamily, H.; Safy, R.; Makharita, R. Influence of medicinal plant extracts on the growth of oral pathogens streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus acidophilus: An in-vitro study. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 7, 2328–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Philip, N.; Leishman, S.J.; Bandara, H.; Walsh, L.J. Polyphenol-rich cranberry extracts modulate virulence of streptococcus mutans-candida albicans biofilms implicated in the pathogenesis of early childhood caries. Pediatr. Dent. 2019, 41, 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  60. Manome, A.; Abiko, Y.; Kawashima, J.; Washio, J.; Fukumoto, S.; Takahashi, N. Acidogenic potential of oral bifidobacterium and its high fluoride tolerance. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rosário Palma, A.L.; Domingues, N.; Barros, P.P.; Brito, G.N.B.; Jorge, A.O.C. Influence of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus sanguinis on virulence of Candida albicans: In vitro and in vivo studies. Folia. Microbiol. 2019, 64, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mira, A.; Buetas, E.; Rosier, B.; Mazurel, D.; Villanueva-Castellote, A.; Llena, C.; Ferrer, M.D. Development of an in vitro system to study oral biofilms in real time through impedance technology: Validation and potential applications. J. Oral Microbiol. 2019, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shu, M.; Wong, L.; Miller, J.H.; Sissons, C.H. Development of multi-species consortia biofilms of oral bacteria as an enamel and root caries model system. Arch. Oral Biol. 2000, 45, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Balhaddad, A.A.; Kansara, A.A.; Hidan, D.; Weir, M.D.; Xu, H.H.K.; Melo, M.A.S. Toward dental caries: Exploring nanoparticle-based platforms and calcium phosphate compounds for dental restorative materials. Bioact. Mater. 2019, 4, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Abdalla, M.A.; McGaw, L.J. The pharmacological and nutritional significance of plant-derived natural products: An alternative for animal health. In Ethnoveterinary Medicine; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  66. Malvania, E.A.; Sharma, A.S.; Sheth, S.A.; Rathod, S.; Chovatia, N.R.; Kachwala, M.S. In vitro analysis of licorice (glycyrrhiza glabra) root extract activity on streptococcus mutans in comparison to chlorhexidine and fluoride mouthwash. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2019, 20, 1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ekor, M. The growing use of herbal medicines: Issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front. Pharmacol. 2014, 4, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Palhares, R.M.; Drummond, M.G.; Brasil, B.D.; Cosenza, G.P.; Brandão, M.D.; Oliveira, G. Medicinal plants recommended by the world health organization: DNA barcode identification associated with chemical analyses guarantees their quality. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Chen, F.; Wang, D. Novel technologies for the prevention and treatment of dental caries: A patent survey. Expert. Opin.Ther. Pat. 2010, 20, 681–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Rosas-Piñón, Y.; Mejía, A.; Díaz-Ruiz, G.; Aguilar, M.I.; Sánchez-Nieto, S.; Rivero-Cruz, J.F. Ethnobotanical survey and antibacterial activity of plants used in the Altiplane region of Mexico for the treatment of oral cavity infections. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shad, A.A.; Ahmad, S.; Ullah, R.; AbdEl-Salam, N.M.; Fouad, H.; Rehman, N.U.; Hussain, H.; Saeed, W. Phytochemical and biological activities of four wild medicinal plants. Sci. World J. 2014, 857363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Binimeliz, M.F.; Martins, M.L.; Filho, J.C.C.F.; Cabral, L.M.; da Cruz, A.G.; Maia, L.C.; Fonseca-Gonçalves, A. Antimicrobial effect of a cardamom ethanolic extract on oral biofilm: An ex vivo study. Nat. Oral Care. Dent. Ther. 2020, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yabuta, Y.; Mukoyama, H.; Kaneda, Y.; Kimura, N.; Bito, T.; Ichiyanagi, T.; Ishihara, A.; Watanabe, F. A lemon myrtle extract inhibits glucosyltransferases activity of Streptococcus mutans. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 2018, 82, 1584–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Farkash, Y.; Feldman, M.; Ginsburg, I.; Shalish, M.; Steinberg, D. The effect of Padma-hepaten herbal combination on the caries-inducing properties of Streptococcus mutans on orthodontic surfaces. J. Herb. Med. 2019, 20, 100321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sachdeva, A.; Sharma, A.; Bhateja, S. Emerging trends of herbs and spices in dentistry. Biomed J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2018, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ferreira-Filho, J.C.C.; Marre, A.T.d.O.; de Sá Almeida, J.S.; Lobo, L.d.A.; Farah, A.; Romanos, M.T.V.; Maia, L.C.; Valença, A.M.G.; Fonseca-Gonçalves, A. Therapeutic potential of bauhinia forficata link in dental biofilm treatment. J. Med. Food 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ardiansyah, S.; Hashiinah, F.; Farida, R.; Puspitawati, R. Javanese turmeric (Curcuma xanthorrhixza roxb.) ethanol extract has inhibitory effect on the development of intermediate phase of candida albicans biofilm. J. Int. Dent. Med Res. 2019, 12, 460–464. [Google Scholar]
  78. Choi, H.-A.; Cheong, D.-E.; Lim, H.-D.; Kim, W.-H.; Ham, M.-H.; Oh, M.-H.; Wu, Y.; Shin, H.-J.; Kim, G.-J. Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities of the methanol extracts of medicinal plants against dental pathogens Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 1242–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Alloha, I.B.; Aziz, N.A.L.B.; Faisal, G.G.; Abllah, Z.; Arzmi, M.H. Effects of Eurycoma Longifolia Jack (Tongkat Ali) alcoholic root extract against oral pathogens. Pharmacogn. Res. 2019, 11, 1299–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Khalid, M.; Hassani, D.; Bilal, M.; Butt, Z.A.; Hamayun, M.; Ahmad, A.; Huang, D.; Hussain, A. Identification of oral cavity biofilm forming bacteria and determination of their growth inhibition by Acacia arabica, Tamarix aphylla L. and Melia azedarach L. medicinal plants. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 81, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ambade, S.V.; Deshpande, N.M. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of essential oil of cymbopogon citratus against oral microflora associated with dental plaque. Eur. J. Med. Plants Res. 2019, 28, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Chatterjee, T.; Das, S. Antimicrobial efficacy of some medicinal plant extract against Streptococcus mutans causing dental caries. J. Med. Plants 2017, 5, 315–317. [Google Scholar]
  83. Kanth, M.R.; Prakash, A.R.; Sreenath, G.; Reddy, V.S.; Huldah, S. Efficacy of specific plant products on microorganisms causing dental caries. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, ZM01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Patel, D.M.; Chauhan, J.B.; Ishnava, K.B. Studies on the anticariogenic potential of medicinal plant seed and fruit extracts. Nat. Oral Care Dent. Ther. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yang, Y.; Park, B.-I.; Hwang, E.-H.; You, Y.-O. Composition analysis and inhibitory effect of Sterculia lychnophora against biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Latti, P.; Subramaniam Ramanarayanan, G. Antifungal efficacy of spice extracts against Candida albicans: An in vitro study. Indian. J. Community Med. 2019, 44, S77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jeong, S.I.; Kim, B.S.; Keum, K.S.; Lee, K.H.; Kang, S.Y.; Park, B.I.; Lee, Y.R.; You, Y.O. Kaurenoic acid from aralia continentalis inhibits biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 160592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Limsong, J.; Benjavongkulchai, E.; Kuvatanasuchati, J. Inhibitory effect of some herbal extracts on adherence of Streptococcus mutans. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 92, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Lee, Y.C.; Cho, S.G.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, J.N. Anticariogenic potential of korean native plant extracts against Streptococcus mutans. Planta. Med. 2019, 85, 1242–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Adyanthaya, A.; Ismail, S.; Sreelakshmi, N. Indian traditional medicinal herbs against dental caries–an unsung past to a bright future. Saudi J. Oral Dent. Res. 2016, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  91. Geetha, R.; Thangavelu, L. Anti-bacterial activity of three essential oils-An in vitro study. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 10, 1049–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Philip, N.; Leishman, S.; Walsh, L. Potential role for natural products in dental caries control. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2019, 17, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Ancuceanu, R.; Anghel, A.I.; Ionescu, C.; Hovaneț, M.V.; Cojocaru-Toma, M.; Dinu, M. Clinical trials with herbal products for the prevention of dental caries and their quality: A scoping study. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Janakiram, C.; Venkitachalam, R.; Fontelo, P.; Iafolla, T.J.; Dye, B.A. Effectiveness of herbal oral care products in reducing dental plaque & gingivitis—A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 20, 43. [Google Scholar]
  95. Guo, L.; Edlund, A. Targeted antimicrobial peptides: A novel technology to eradicate harmful streptococcus mutans. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2017, 45, 557. [Google Scholar]
  96. Wasfi, R.; Abd El-Rahman, O.A.; Zafer, M.M.; Ashour, H.M. Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. inhibit growth, biofilm formation and gene expression of caries-inducing Streptococcus mutans. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 1972–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Piwat, S.; Pahumunto, N.; Srisommai, P.; Mapaisansin, C.; Teanpaisan, R. Effect of probiotic delivery vehicles for probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus SD11 in caries prevention: A clinical study. J. Food Process. Pres. 2019, 43, e14147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zaura, E.; Twetman, S. Critical appraisal of oral pre- and probiotics for caries prevention and care. Caries Res. 2019, 53, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Shah, N. Probiotics and prebiotics. Agro Food Ind. Hi-Tech. 2004, 1, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  100. Pradhan, D.; Mallappa, R.H.; Grover, S. Comprehensive approaches for assessing the safety of probiotic bacteria. Food Control 2020, 108, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ohshima, T.; Kawai, T.; Maeda, N. Bacterial cell-free probiotics using effective substances produced by probiotic bacteria, for application in the oral cavity. In Prebiotics and Probiotics-Potential Benefits in Human Nutrition and Health; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Jalasvuori, H.; Haukioja, A.; Tenovuo, J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri strains ATCC PTA 5289 and ATCC 55730 differ in their cariogenic properties in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 2012, 57, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hasslöf, P.; Stecksén-Blicks, C. Chapter 10: Probiotic bacteria and dental caries. In The Impact of Nutrition and Diet on Oral Health; Zohoori, F.V., Duckworth, R.M., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2020; Volume 28, pp. 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  104. Giacaman, R. Sugars and beyond. The role of sugars and the other nutrients and their potential impact on caries. Oral Dis. 2018, 24, 1185–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ramanujam, P.; Poorni, S.; Srinivasan, M.R.; Sureshbabu, N.M. Probiotics in dental caries prevention. Indian J. Nutr. Diet. 2019, 56, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Villalobos-Delgado, L.H.; Nevárez-Moorillon, G.V.; Caro, I.; Quinto, E.J.; Mateo, J. Natural antimicrobial agents to improve foods shelf life. In Food Quality and Shelf Life; Galanakis, C.M., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 125–157. [Google Scholar]
  107. Krzyściak, W.; Kościelniak, D.; Papież, M.; Vyhouskaya, P.; Zagórska-Świeży, K.; Kołodziej, I.; Bystrowska, B.; Jurczak, A. Effect of a Lactobacillus salivarius probiotic on a double-species Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans caries biofilm. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Burton, J.P.; Drummond, B.K.; Chilcott, C.N.; Tagg, J.R.; Thomson, W.M.; Hale, J.D.F.; Wescombe, P.A. Influence of the probiotic Streptococcus salivarius strain M18 on indices of dental health in children: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lin, X.; Chen, X.; Tu, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, H. Effect of probiotic lactobacilli on the growth of streptococcus mutans and multispecies biofilms isolated from children with active caries. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017, 23, 4175–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Nadelman, P.; Monteiro, A.; Balthazar, C.F.; Silva, H.L.A.; Cruz, A.G.; de Almeida Neves, A.; Fonseca-Gonçalves, A.; Maia, L.C. Probiotic fermented sheep’s milk containing Lactobacillus casei 01: Effects on enamel mineral loss and Streptococcus counts in a dental biofilm model. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 54, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Su, P.; Henriksson, A.; Nilsson, C.; Mitchell, H. Synergistic effect of green tea extract and probiotics on the pathogenic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 1837–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dimitrova, M.; Ivanov, G.; Mihalev, K.; Slavchev, A.; Ivanova, I.; Vlaseva, R. Investigation of antimicrobial activity of polyphenol-enriched extracts against probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Food Sci. Appl. Biotechnol. 2019, 2, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram of the dental biofilm formation. EPS, extracellular polymers. S. mutans, streptococcus mutans.
Figure 1. Diagram of the dental biofilm formation. EPS, extracellular polymers. S. mutans, streptococcus mutans.
Pathogens 09 00569 g001
Figure 2. Diagram of the caries process in relation to diet.
Figure 2. Diagram of the caries process in relation to diet.
Pathogens 09 00569 g002
Table 1. Plant compounds/extracts and their bioactivity against cariogenic microorganisms.
Table 1. Plant compounds/extracts and their bioactivity against cariogenic microorganisms.
No. Plants Extracts & Bioactive CompoundTarget OrganismsBiological ActivityReference
1Acacia arabicaEthanol, acetone, and water extractStrong biofilm-forming strains isolated from patientsAnti-biofilm,
antimicrobial
[80] 2017
2Tamarix aphylla L.
3Melia azedarach L.
4Bauhinia forficataTincture Streptococcus spp.
Salivary samples from healthy volunteers
Anti-biofilm,
antimicrobial
[16] 2019
5Bauhinia forficataPhenolic acids, chlorogenic acidsS. mutans (ATCC 25175)
Streptococcus sanguinis (ATCC 10556)
Candida albicans (ATCC 22972)
Fusubacterium nucleatum (ATCC 25586)
Lactobacillus casei (ATCC 393)
Prevotella nigrescens (ATCC 33563), Bifidobacterium dentium (ATCC 27534)
Antimicrobial,
anti-demineralizing
[76] 2020
6Curcuma xanthrorrhizaEthanol extract, xanthorrhizolC. albicansAnti-biofilm,
antimicrobial
[77] 2019
7.Cymbopogon citratusLemon Grass Essential OilStreptococcus agalactiae,
Staphylococcus epidermidisand,
Lactobacillus fermentum
Antimicrobial,
Anti-biofilm
[81] 2019
8Pongamia pinnataMethanolic extractS. mutans MTCC 497,
S. mutans MTCC 890
Antimicrobial [82] 2017
9Acacia catechuMethanolic extract
10CloveEugenol, oleic acid, lipidsMicroorganisms collected from extracted teethAntimicrobial [83] 2016
11Ginger-garlic pasteGingerol, allicin
12Tea treeCatechins
13Camellia japonicaPhenolic compound, flavonoidS. mutans ATCC 25175
Candida albicans NUM961
Antimicrobial, anti-biofilm, anti-GTase[78] 2017
14Thuja orientalis
15Quercus infecteriaTannins, cardiac glycosides, sterioids, terpenoids, alkaloidsLactobacillus caseiAntimicrobial[84] 2020
16Sterculia lychnophora HanceOrganic acids, glycosides,S. mutans ATCC 25175Antimicrobial, cariogenic properties
inhibition
[85] 2016
17Cinnamon barkMethanol extract,
cinnamaldehyde
Candidaalbicans ATCC 2091Antimicrobial‘[86] 2019
18Cinnamomum burmanniiWater extractS. mutans UA159Antimicrobial,
anti-biofilm
[53] 2020
19Licorice RootGlycyrrhizin S. mutans ATCC 25175Antimicrobial [66] 2019
20Eurycoma longifolia jackEthanol extract, canthin-6-one alkaloids, β-carboline alkaloids, quassinoidsCandida albicans,
S. mutans,
Lactobacillus casei
Antifungal,
Antimicrobial,
[79] 2019
Table 2. Probiotics and their bioactivity against cariogenic microorganisms, examined using the biofilm model.
Table 2. Probiotics and their bioactivity against cariogenic microorganisms, examined using the biofilm model.
ProbioticsTarget Bacteria Type of Biofilm Model Bioactive Compound/Action Mechanism References
(Year)
L. rhamnosus SD11S. mutans
lactobacilli
Human oral cavityIntegrate into the bacterial communities of the dental biofilm[97] 2019
L. salivariusS. mutans
C. albicans
Double species, staticStrong competitor of oral pathogens[107] 2017
Streptococcus salivarius strain M18S. mutansplaque-disclosing solutionBacterins[108] 2013
L. casei ATCC 393,
L. reuteri ATCC 23272,
L. plantarum ATCC 14917,
L. salivarius ATCC 11741
S. mutans
ATCC 25175
Single specie biofilm,
dual-S. mutansLactobacillus spp. biofilm,
static
Organic acid, peroxide[96]
2018
L. casei Shirota,
L. casei LC01,
L. plantarum ST-III
L. paracasei LPC37
S. mutans
Streptococcus spp.,
S. sanguinis
Multi-species biofilm, static
Alteration of the oral microbiota[109] 2017
L. casei 01S. mutans,
S. parasanguinis,
S. salivarius
Multi-species biofilm, staticAdhere to dental surfaces and integrate into the bacterial communities of the dental biofilm[110] 2019
Lactobacillus
plantarum FB-T9
S. mutansRat oral cavityFB-T9 is a strong competitor of S. mutans for temporal and spatial niches[54] 2020

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Daliri, E.B.-M.; Kim, N.; Kim, J.-R.; Yoo, D.; Oh, D.-H. Microbial Etiology and Prevention of Dental Caries: Exploiting Natural Products to Inhibit Cariogenic Biofilms. Pathogens 2020, 9, 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070569

AMA Style

Chen X, Daliri EB-M, Kim N, Kim J-R, Yoo D, Oh D-H. Microbial Etiology and Prevention of Dental Caries: Exploiting Natural Products to Inhibit Cariogenic Biofilms. Pathogens. 2020; 9(7):569. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070569

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xiuqin, Eric Banan-Mwine Daliri, Namhyeon Kim, Jong-Rae Kim, Daesang Yoo, and Deog-Hwan Oh. 2020. "Microbial Etiology and Prevention of Dental Caries: Exploiting Natural Products to Inhibit Cariogenic Biofilms" Pathogens 9, no. 7: 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070569

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop