1. Introduction
Novel sensors and actuators have been developed in a wide range of MEMS applications to meet the ongoing trends of miniaturization and increases in functionality. Important fields of application are in silicon (Si) photonics requiring actuators for switching and tuning at small scales. The microactuators should allow for large strokes at small footprints and fabrication should be compatible with silicon technology. So far, the vast majority of actuators for nanophotonic switching and tuning is based on electrostatics, using either comb-drive or gap-closing actuators [
1,
2]. Only in a few cases, other principles such as piezoelectric [
3], thermal [
4] or magnetic actuation [
5] are applied.
Shape memory alloy (SMA) microactuators are an attractive solution owing to their distinct characteristics, such as a large actuation force, large displacement and low actuation voltage. The unique properties of SMA films and corresponding microstructures and nanostructures fabricated thereof provide a basis for the development of ultra-small actuators and systems with enhanced performance [
6,
7,
8]. SMA/Si cantilever beam actuators have been demonstrated to show favorable scaling in the actuation performance with lateral dimensions down to 50 nm [
9,
10]. An ultra-compact nanophotonic SMA switch has been realized by the co-integration of SMA/Si nanoactuators and photonic waveguides on the same chip [
11,
12]. Cantilever beam actuators based on polymer/TiNiHf/Si composites enable bistable actuation that could be scaled from the mm-scale down to the nanoscale [
13]. This performance is enabled by the large transformation hysteresis of TiNiHf films above room temperature.
The direct Joule heating of cantilever-based SMA bimorph actuators is known to generate a large size-dependent temperature gradient along the length of the cantilevers that can well exceed 50 °C/µm [
10]. Because of this thermal scaling effect, the SMA layer undergoes phase transformation only in a local region, which significantly enhances power consumption to complete the phase transformation [
11]. In the following, we present a novel approach to optimize the power consumption of cantilever-based TiNiHf/Si microactuators upon Joule heating through temperature homogenization. The electrical performance of temperature-homogenized microactuators is compared to non-optimized reference TiNiHf/Si microactuators.
2. TiNiHf Films
Recently, Curtis et al. demonstrated that the TiNiHf/Si and TiNiHf/SiO
2/Si film composites annealed at 635 °C showed favorable phase transformation properties including a phase transformation with a large thermal hysteresis above room temperature. This performance was shown to prevail upon downscaling the thickness of TiNiHf films down to 440 nm on Si substrates and 220 nm on SiO
2/Si substrates [
13].
In this work, TiNiHf/Si cantilever beam microactuators are fabricated with the critical thickness of 440 nm using a DC magnetron multilayer sputter deposition approach as described in [
13]. Amorphous TiNiHf films are magnetron sputtered on SOI substrates that have a 2 µm thick Si device layer and annealed at 635 °C for 5 min. The average film composition of sputtered films is measured using energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy and found to be Ti
40.
4Ni
48Hf
11.
6. Further details on the sputtering process and material’s properties of the TiNiHf films can be found in [
13]. Four-point electrical resistance measurements are carried out inside a cryostat to investigate the phase transformation of TiNiHf films constrained by a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate. Quasi-stationary conditions are established by ramping the temperature step-wise and providing for sufficient waiting times in each step to guarantee that the influence of temperature change is negligible during measurement. Phase transformation temperatures are determined using the tangential method.
Figure 1 shows the temperature-dependent electrical resistance of a TiNiHf film of 440 nm thickness upon cyclic heating and cooling.
The cyclic heating and cooling of the material reveal the typical martensitic phase transformation temperatures in line with the transformation temperatures and thermal hysteresis values reported for sputtered freestanding TiNiHf films [
13]. The complete hysteresis loop shows the full phase transformation of the TiNiHf material. The characteristic phase transformation temperatures are determined using the tangential method. The hysteresis width is determined via the difference of average transformation temperatures
is 67 °C (
,
).
3. Modelling and Design Approach
The shape memory effect is described using a 1D Tanaka-type model that has been extended to isotropic SMA materials of a 3D shape [
14,
15]. A variable for martensite phase fraction
is used that approximates the kinetics of the phase transformation by an exponential step function depending on the temperature and stress. In the phase transformation regime between austenitic and martensitic states, the material properties are described using a rule of mixture [
16]. For instance, the thermal expansion coefficient of TiNiHf is approximated as a mixture of thermal expansion coefficients of martensite
and austenite
:
For the simulation of temperature profiles, the stationary heat equation for the TiNiHf/Si cantilever beam is solved numerically by approximating the temperature-dependent heat conductivity of the two layers. The heat conductivity of TiNiHf
is determined using the Wiedemann–Franz law [
17] describing the heat conductivity of metals as a function of electrical conductivity
σ:
with the proportionality constant
[
17]. The thermal conductivity of Si [
18] is approximated using
Finite element simulations of the Joule heating of TiNiHf/Si cantilever actuators are performed by using COMSOL Multiphysics 6.0, which allows us to couple the models for the electrical current profiles and heat transfer. The resistive heating via electro-thermal coupling acts as a thermal stress on the solid–mechanics interface, causing differential thermal expansion as well as strain change due to martensitic phase transformation. The material properties of TiNiHf films are taken from a recent experimental study (See
Table 1) [
13]. The stress and electrical conductivity in the phase transformation regime are approximated using the rule of mixture as described before.
A double-beam cantilever design with two contact pads is chosen for the TiNiHf/Si microactuators, as it facilitates Joule heating. A major concern with direct Joule heating is the scaling effects of heat transfer. Due to rapid heat transfer at the onset of the cantilever beams, Joule heating results in a temperature gradient along the beams, showing the highest values at the beam tip and lowest values close to substrate at the beam onset. As a consequence of this in-homogenous temperature profile, the phase fraction of martensite varies along the beam; thus, all material properties depending on the phase fraction vary along the beam as well. In particular, some sections of the beam may have already transformed to austenite, while other sections may still be in a martensitic state. Consequently, a large electrical power is required to heat the entire beam above the phase transformation temperature of about 164 °C, and actuation stroke is reduced.
Figure 2 shows the simulated temperature profiles along the x-direction of a TiNiHf/Si cantilever beam for various values of electrical power. At 15 mW of electrical power, the reference design exhibits a maximum tip temperature of 247 °C, while the beam onset is near room temperature (
Figure 2a,c). Consequently, only about 50% of SMA material has reached the austenitic finish temperature (
°C) and the remaining 50% remains in the martensitic state. Further increasing the electric power accumulates a large amount of heat at the cantilever tip and, thereby, increases the temperature gradient considerably. At 21.4 mW, the reference TiNiHf/Si design already reaches a temperature gradient of 8 °C/µm.
This disadvantage can be mitigated by the design of additional folded beams with a direction perpendicular to the active cantilever beams, giving rise to much more homogeneous temperature profiles, as shown in
Figure 2b,d. Already at the electrical power of 11.8 mW, the maximum tip temperature reaches 210 °C, while only 22% of SMA material remains in a martensitic state. The maximum power required to complete the phase transformation is about 12.25 mW. Thus, the presented approach of temperature homogenization largely eliminates the issue of different phase states at local regions of the cantilever beam.
4. Fabrication of TiNiHf/Si Bimorph Microactuators
Figure 3 shows a schematic of the process flow for fabrication of the TiNiHf/Si microactuators. This process follows our previous approach of micromachining and nanomachining a SOI wafer prior to SMA film deposition. It has the advantage that the SMA’s functionality is not impaired by silicon technology and film delamination is prevented [
22]. The starting substrate is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) chip with a 2 μm device layer and 2 μm buried oxide layer. In the first steps, the pattern of cantilever beams is transferred to a chromium layer by using e-beam lithography (EBL) (
Figure 3a,b) and a lift-off technique (
Figure 3c). A chromium layer of 30 nm is used as a hard mask to etch the Si device layer via cryogenic reactive ion etching (RIE) (
Figure 3d). In the next step, the chromium layer is removed, and the buried oxide layer is selectively removed via wet etching using hydrofluoric HF acid to obtain freestanding Si beam structures (
Figure 3e). In the final step, the TiNiHf film is deposited via DC magnetron sputtering near room temperature to obtain freestanding TiNiHf/Si bimorph microstructures. Amorphous SMA films are then crystallized at 635 °C via rapid thermal annealing. Scanning electron micrographs of the fabricated TiNiHf /Si microactuators are shown in
Figure 4. The TiNiHf layer of 440 µm and Si layers of 2 μm thickness can be distinguished clearly.
5. Evaluation of Critical Electrical Power
Electrical resistance measurements are performed as a function of electrical power in situ in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) using the four-point method under stationary equilibrium conditions as described in
Section 2. Nanomanipulators are used to establish electrical interconnections to individual microactuators as illustrated in
Figure A1 in
Appendix A.
Figure 5 shows typical electrical resistance characteristics for different TiNiHf/Si microactuators without folded beam structures (reference design) and with folded beam structures for temperature homogenization. The electrical resistance characteristics show a complete hysteresis loop upon Joule heating and cooling, revealing the required electrical power for completing the phase transformation. Upon Joule heating, the average electrical resistance shows a characteristic drop for increasing electrical power, reflecting the course of the phase transformation. In the reference design, the resistance drop occurs gradually, as the phase transformation progresses gradually along the cantilever beam from the tip to the onset. In contrast, the temperature-homogenized design exhibits a much sharper drop in electrical resistance due to a larger volume fraction of SMA material transforming at a given heating power. In the present case (
Figure 5a), the critical heating power required for a complete hysteresis loop reduces from 15 mW to about 11.8 mW corresponding to a reduction in power consumption by 21.8%.
Figure 5b shows a comparison of TiNiHf /Si microactuators with different lengths of folded beam structures
to illustrate their effect on temperature-homogenization. When increasing
from 30 to 40 µm, the heating power required for complete phase transformation reduces from 7.9 to 5.5 mW, while the corresponding reference design requires about 10 mW. Thus, the reduction in power consumption reaches 45% in the latter case.
Table 2 summarizes the results concerning the critical electrical power required for a complete hysteresis loop for each sample. By narrowing the width of the cantilever beams from 5 to 3 µm (compare samples Ref100, #1 and #2), an additional power saving from 21.8% to 48% is achieved. The reduced cross-section hinders heat transfer at the cantilever beam onset and, thus, favors temperature homogenization and power optimization. However, reducing the beam width for power optimization is limited largely by requirements on the mechanical performance of the microactuators. Increasing the length of the folded beams from 30 µm to 40 µm (compare samples Ref75, #3 and #4) increases the temperature-homogenization effect and enhances the power saving from 21% to 45%. A further increase in the folded beam length may further improve power saving, but might lead to mechanical instability. In addition, design limitations due to fabrication constraints have to be considered in this case.
The temperature profile along the beam cannot be measured accurately due to size limitations. Therefore, we estimate the maximum temperatures at the cantilever tip by our simulations of Joule heating-induced temperature profiles.
Figure 6 shows simulated maximum tip temperatures for TiNiHf/Si microactuators with two different beam lengths and widths. For instance, temperature-homogenized TiNiHf/Si microactuators with dimensions
= 75 µm,
= 3 µm and lwing = 30 µm show a maximum tip temperature of 212 °C at a power of 8 mW, while the reference microactuators show a maximum tip temperature of 230 °C at 10 mW. These results indicate that a lower heating power is required to reach a certain maximum tip temperature for the temperature homogenized design.