Next Article in Journal
A Descriptive Study of Keel Bone Fractures in Hens and Roosters from Four Non-Commercial Laying Breeds Housed in Furnished Cages
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Genetic Selection for Growth and Broodstock Diet n-3 LC-PUFA Levels on Reproductive Performance of Gilthead Seabream, Sparus aurata
Previous Article in Journal
Alleviation of the Adverse Effect of Dietary Carbohydrate by Supplementation of Myo-Inositol to the Diet of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/ani10112191
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Parental Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 (fads2) Expression and Diet on Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis

by
Hanlin Xu
1,*,
Shajahan Ferosekhan
1,2,
Serhat Turkmen
1,3,
Juan Manuel Afonso
1,
María Jesús Zamorano
1 and
Marisol Izquierdo
1
1
Aquaculture Research Group (GIA), Institute of Sustainable Aquaculture and Marine Ecosystems (ECOAQUA), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Crta. Taliarte s/n, 35214 Telde, Spain
2
ICAR-Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar 751002, India
3
Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(11), 2191; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112191
Submission received: 17 October 2020 / Revised: 14 November 2020 / Accepted: 19 November 2020 / Published: 23 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition, Nutrigenomics and Epigenetics in Fish)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The present study was on the gene expression of a rate-limiting enzyme in long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs), fatty acyl desaturase 2 (fads2), throughout the embryonic development of a gilthead sea bream. The results showed a maternal transfer of fads2 mRNA to the developing oocyte. The embryonic fads2 expression might start after the neurula stage. No effect was found in fads2 expression in developing eggs from broodstock fed with a diet rich in rapeseed oil or fish oil. The present study provides information on the change of LC-PUFA biosynthesis during embryogenesis.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that it is possible to increase the ability of marine fish to produce long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid from their 18C precursors by nutritional programming or using broodstock with a higher fatty acyl desaturase 2 (fads2) expression. However, those studies failed to show the effect of these interventions on the expression of the fads2 gene in the developing egg. Moreover, there were no studies on the temporal expression of the fads2 during ontogeny in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). In order to determine the changes in expression of fads2 during ontogeny, gilthead sea bream broodstock with a high (HRO) or low (LRO) fads2 expression fed a diet previously used for nutritional programming, or a fish oil-based diet (LFO) were allowed to spawn. The samples were taken at the stages of spawning, morula, high blastula, gastrula, neurula, heart beating, hatch and 3 day-old first exogenous feeding larvae to determine fads2 expression throughout embryonic development. The results showed the presence of fads2 mRNA in the just spawned egg, denoting the maternal mRNA transfer to the developing oocyte. Later, fads2 expression increased after the neurula, from heart beating until 3-day-old larvae, denoting the transition from maternal to embryonic gene expression. In addition, the eggs obtained from broodstock with high fads2 expression showed a high docosahexaenoic acid content, which correlated with the downregulation of the fads2 expression found in the developing embryo and larvae. Finally, feeding with the nutritional programming diet with the partial replacement of fish oil by rapeseed oil did not affect the long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA) contents nor fads2 expression in the gilthead sea bream developing eggs.

1. Introduction

Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs), particularly docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3, DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3, EPA) and arachidonic acid (20:4n-6, ARA), play relevant structural and functional roles in animal cells [1,2]. They are critical components of cell and organelle membranes [3] and their derived molecules, such as eicosanoids or docosanoids, participate in cell signaling processes [4]. In fish, LC-PUFAs are required for growth [5] or brain and immune system development and maintenance [6,7,8], among many other functions. In human nutrition, fish is the most important source of LC-PUFAs, especially DHA and EPA, whereas in farmed fish, fish oil (FO) is the traditional source of LC-PUFAs. However, FO is mostly derived from capture fisheries, which is a limited resource that would restrain the sustainable development of aquaculture. Thus, certain vegetable oils may partly replace FO in marine fish diets, since they are more environmentally and economically sustainable [9]. Despite vegetable oils lacking LC-PUFAs, they are abundant in their 18-carbon precursors [10].
The biosynthesis of LC-PUFAs is catalyzed by desturases and elongases. Like mammals, fish are unable to synthesize de novo LC-PUFAs, since they lack n-12 and n-15 desaturases, which only exist in some plants or invertebrates [11]. Therefore, either LC-PUFAs or their 18-carbon precursors must be included in diets for farmed fish. ARA and EPA are synthesized from 18:2n-6 and 18:3n-3, respectively, through the ∆6 desaturation–elongation and ∆5 desaturation pathway, or the elongation–∆8 desaturation and ∆5 desaturation pathway [12,13]. DHA may be synthesized in vivo from EPA through elongation–∆4 desaturation or elongation–elongation–∆6 desaturation and ß-oxidation [13]. Comparing with freshwater fish or euryhaline fish, marine fish have a lower ability to synthesize LC-PUFAs from their 18-carbon precursors [14]. One of the mechanisms leading to a limited ability from LC-PUFA synthesis in marine fish is the weak activity of these enzymes [15,16]. For instance, the activity of fatty acyl desaturase 2 (Fads2) in cod (Gadus morhua L.) is lower than in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) [17]. This could be related to the abundance of LC-PUFAs in the marine food web, originating from phytoplankton, which would reduce the need to synthesize these important fatty acids [18,19]. In addition, the LC-PUFA synthesis capacity of different fish species is also related to genome specificities. For instance, the fatty acyl desaturase 1 (fads1) gene, which codes for ∆5 desaturation, is absent in many telostei, although duplicated fads2 or ∆5/∆6 bifunctional Fads2 may be found in those species [12,20]. Considering the absence of fads1 in gilthead sea bream [12], fads2 is a major rate-limiting enzyme in the LC-PUFA biosynthesis in this species. Indeed, in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata), Fads2 has both ∆6 and ∆8 desaturase activities [21]. On the contrary, ∆5 desaturate activity seems weak in gilthead sea bream, since the addition of 14C-labeled 18:3n-3 to the hepatocytes culture medium leads to a 41% of the radioactivity recovered in the ∆6 product 18:4n-3, whereas when 14C-labeled 18:4n-3 is added, only 0.7% of the radioactive is recovered from the Δ5 product, EPA [15].
Large variations in Fads2 activity are found among individuals of the same species in different environmental or nutritional conditions [6,22]. For instance, in gilthead sea bream, fads2 expression in liver or red blood cells can be up to six or five times different among individuals from the same gender, when they are kept under the same environmental and nutritional conditions [23]. In addition, feeding a low LC-PUFA diet increases fads2 expression or Fads2 products [18,22,24,25,26]. Therefore, either the individual selection of high fads2 fish or feeding a low LC-PUFA diet could be used as a tool to produce fish with a higher Fads2 activity and thus, a better ability to synthesize LC-PUFAs when fed vegetable oil. On one hand, the offspring from broodstock with high fads2 expression showed improved growth performance and feed utilization when challenged with a diet low in fishmeal (FM) and FO [27]. In addition, broodstock with high fads2 expression showed a better reproductive performance, in terms of fecundity and sperm and egg quality [22]. On the other hand, feeding gilthead sea bream broodstock during the spawning season with a diet low in LC-PUFA diet improves the use of low FM/FO diets in their offspring [10,27] even up to 16 months [28]. In rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), the nutritional condition by the complete replacement of dietary FM and FO by vegetable ingredients affects the expression of genes related to growth, amino acid and cholesterol metabolism [29], without negative effects for the second generation [30]. However, none of these studies were able to show any effect on the fads2 expression in eggs due to the large variations obtained [22], which could be related to the different egg developmental stages in the eggs or the interference with a potential maternal transfer of fads2 mRNA [31]. Despite that the fads2 expression may occur at an early developmental stage in teleost [31,32,33], the temporal expression of fads2 during the ontogenesis of gilthead sea bream has not yet been studied. Moreover, the effect of broodstock fads2 expression and nutritional status on fads2 expression during ontogeny has also not been addressed.
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine, on the one hand, the temporal changes in fads2 expression during ontogeny, and on the other hand, the influence of broodstock diet and the parental ability to express fads2. For that purpose, gilthead sea bream broodstock with a different ability to synthesize LC-PUFAs were fed either an FO-based diet or a diet previously used for the nutritional programming of progeny [22] and their eggs were sampled during ontogenesis to determine the temporal changes in fads2 expression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Statement

All the animal experiments were performed according to the European Union Directive (2010/63/EU) on the protection of animals for scientific purposes, at Fundación Canaria Parque Científico Tecnológico, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain). REF: 007/2012 CEBA ULPGC.

2.2. Broodstock fads2 Expression

To obtain broodstock with a different ability to synthesize LC-PUFAs from the precursors linoleic acid (18:2n-6) and α-linolenic acid (18:3n-3), 3 months prior the spawning season, 185 gilthead sea bream brood fish of 1–2 kg were fed for one month at a diet high in linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid and low in LC-PUFAs promoting the upregulation of fads2 [22]. Then, peripheral blood samples were collected and the fads2 expression of blood cells was determined. Based on their fads2 mRNA copy numbers per µL in blood cells, brood fish with the highest fads2 expression values (H broodstock) or with the lowest ones (L broodstock) were chosen (Table 1). To determine the effect of the broodstock fads2 expression on the fads2 expression in developing eggs and larvae, 6 brood fish with high fads2 expression (HRO) and 6 with low expression (LRO) were allocated into 4 × 1000 L tanks, (2 males and 1 female/tank) and fed a diet containing 1.76% FO and 7.54% rapeseed oil [22] (Supplement Table S1).

2.3. Effect of the Broodstock Diet

In order to determine the effect of the broodstock diet on the offspring fads2 expression, another 3 low fads2 expression broodstock (2 males and 1 female/tank) were fed with a diet containing FO as the only lipid source (LFO) and compared with the previous LRO broodstock. Both experimental diets were isoproteic and isolipidic and manufactured by Skretting ARC (Stavanger, Norway) [22] (Supplement Table S1). Compared with the FO diet, the replacement level of FO by vegetable oil in RO diet was 80%, a level that affects the offspring growth performance and lipid biosynthesis in response to a diet containing a low FM/FO diet [10,34]. In the present study, the content of LC-PUFAs (DHA + EPA + ARA) was 24.11% and 15.42% of total fatty acid in the FO diet and in RO diet, respectively (Supplement Table S2). All broodstock groups were manually fed twice per day (9:00 and 14:00 h) until apparent satiation. Seawater temperature was in the range of 18–22 °C (January–April 2018) and the fish were kept under a natural photoperiod (approximately 12 h light).

2.4. Sampling during Offspring Ontogenesis

At the end of the spawning season, eggs from the same spawning were collected and separately incubated in 500 L tanks. Eggs or larvae samples from each spawn were taken at consecutive stages of development: just after spawning (0 h post spawning (hps)), morula (4 hps), high blastula (6 hps), gastrula (10 hps), neurula (16 hps), heart beating (30 hps), hatch (53 hps) and 3-day-old larvae (125 hps) [35] (Figure 1). Samples were washed by diethyl pyrocarbonate water, kept overnight in RNAlater (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, Burlington, MA, USA) at 4 °C and then stored at −80 °C until analysis.

2.5. RNA Extraction and Digital PCR

RNA from a 200 mg sample was extracted using TRI Reagent (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, Burlington, MA, USA) and RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNAlater was removed from the samples before extraction. Then, each sample was weighed and 1 mL TRI Reagent with 1 steel bead was added. Then, the sample was homogenized in TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) at 30 Hz for 30 s and centrifuged at 13,000× g for 1 min. All of the liquid phase was transferred to a new 1.5 mL tube and 300 µL of chloroform (MilliporeSigma, St. Louis, Burlington, MA, USA) was added and mixed. The mixture was centrifuged at 13,000× g for 15 min. The transparent phase was isolated and mixed with the same volume of 70% ethanol. The mixture was loaded to a RNeasy mini spin column and washed by the RW1 and RPE offered in the kit according to the instruction of manufacturer. Concentrated RNA was eluted in 30 µL of RNase-free water. RNA quality was checked by 1.4% agarose electrophoresis and quantity was measured by Nanodrop 1000 (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Moreover, 1000 ng of RNA was used per sample for cDNA synthesis through iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in iCycler (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Digital PCR was conducted in QX200™ Droplet Digital™ PCR System (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The reaction system, containing 100 ng of cDNA, fads2 primer (forward: 5′-GCAGAGCCACAGCAGCAGGGA-3′, reverse: 5′-CGGCCTGCGCCTGAGCAGTT-3′, Gene bank No. GQ162822.1) and Evagreen SuperMix (Bio-rad) was loaded to the droplet generator to generate the oil droplet and then proceeded in C1000 Touch thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The cycling condition of PCR was: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 63 °C for 1 min, and then stabilized the signal at 4 °C for 5 min, 90 °C for 5 min, finally the reaction was hold at 4 °C. The PCR amplification of the nucleic acid target in the droplets was read in a QX200 droplet reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.6. Lipid and Fatty Acid Analysis

Lipids from diets and 24 hps eggs were extracted with chloroform/methanol (2:1 v/v) [36] and transmethylated to obtain fatty acid methyl esters [37]. Then, fatty acid methyl esters were extracted with hexane:diethyl ether (1:1, v/v) and purified by the adsorption chromatography on NH2 Sep-pack cartridges (Waters, Milford, CT, USA). Afterwards, fatty acid methyl esters were separated by gas–liquid chromatography (GLC) (Agilent 7820A, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a Supercolvax-10-fused silica capillary column (length: 30 mm, internal diameter: 0.32 mm, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) using helium as a carrier gas. The column temperature was 180 °C for the first 10 min, increasing to 215 °C at a rate of 2.5 °C min−1 and then held at 215 °C for 10 min [38]. Peaks were identified by comparison with external standards and well characterized FO (EPA 28, Nippai, Ltd. Tokyo, Japan).

2.7. Data Analysis

Target cDNA concentration was analyzed by QuantaSoft Analysis Pro tool (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The results were presented as the means ± standard deviation (S.D.). and analyzed by SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) for Mac. The comparison of the data between the different stages within the group were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Fads2 expression data between groups were analyzed by independent-samples t-test. Linear, exponential and logarithmic regression were performed through SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Temporal Expression of fads2 during Offspring Ontogenesis

Analysis of the average fads2 expression values in eggs and larvae for all experimental groups showed an increase during embryogenesis, following a significant lineal regression (R2 = 0.95, p < 0.001) with time after spawning (Figure 2). Thus, fads2 expression was registered at spawning (0 hps), remained low during the morula (4 hps), blastula (6 hps) and gastrula stages (10 hps) and even decreased until the neurula stage (16 hps), which showed the lowest fads2 expression values (Figure 2). From the heart beating stage (30 hps) onwards, the fads2 expression increased, being at this stage significantly (p < 0.05) higher than at the previous morula (4 hps) and neurula stages (16 hps), and at hatching (53 hps), it was also significantly (p < 0.05) higher than at the spawning to neurula stages (Figure 2). The highest values were observed in the 3-day-old larvae, although the large deviations did not allow obtaining significant differences with the fads2 at other developmental stages (Figure 2).

3.2. Influence of Parental fads2 Expression in Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis

The fads2 expression in eggs from broodstock with high (HRO) or low fads2 expression (LRO) also followed significant (p < 0.001) lineal regressions (R2 = 0.98 and R2 = 0.92, respectively) (Figure 3). These regression lines crossed at 10 hps and thus, whereas in the earlier stages of development fads2 expression tended to be higher for HRO, the later ones tend to be higher for LRO. Nevertheless, due to the large deviations among sampling batches, the t-test comparison between HRO and LRO values at each developmental stage did not showed significant (p > 0.05) differences (Figure 3).
The fads2 expression values in female and male broodstock were in the range of 0.49–14.92 and 1.26–7.06 copies/µL, respectively (Table 1). The comparison of broodstock and offspring fads2 expression by regression analysis showed that the fads2 expression at the neurula stage (16 hps) followed an inverse lineal relation with fads2 expression in broodstock females (R2 = 0.81, p = 0.099) or males (R2 = 0.46, p = 0.067) (Figure 4). These regressions were higher and more significant at the heart beating stage (30 hps), when fads2 expression in embryos followed an inverse logarithmic relation with fads2 expression in females (R2 = 0.85, p = 0.076) or males (R2 = 0.62, p = 0.021) (Figure 4).

3.3. Influence of Parental fads2 Expression in Egg Fatty Acid Profiles

At 24 hps, the DHA content in eggs obtained from the HRO group was 6.46% higher than that from LRO group (p = 0.028). In addition, the ratio between DHA and ARA in the eggs of the HRO group was 8.97 higher than in eggs of the HFO group (p = 0.004). The content of two very long chain n-6 PUFAs, 22:4n-6 and 22:5n-6, were significantly lower in the HRO group than in the LRO group (p < 0.05). Similar differences were also found in the comparison in 18:0, 18:2n-4 and 20:2n-9 content between two groups (p < 0.05) (Table 2). The integrated fatty acid composition of egg was shown in Supplement Table S3.
The Fads2 expression in both female and male broodstock was significantly (p < 0.05) and positively related to the DHA contents in the eggs (R2 = 0.99, p = 0.004 and R2 = 0.68, p = 0.012, for females and males, respectively) (Figure 5). In comparison, the DHA content in eggs was inversely related (R2 = 0.86, p = 0.074) to the fads2 expression in the eggs at neurula stage (16 hps) (R2 = 0.86, p = 0.07, Figure 6a). Similarly, the ratio 20:4n-3/20:3n-3, an indicator of desaturase activity, also followed a significant (R2 = 0.93, p = 0.036) negative relation with fads2 expression (Figure 6b). On the contrary, 18:2n-9, the product of Fads2 from 18:1n-9, contents in eggs were positively related to the fads2 expression in egg at the neurula stage (16 hps) (R2 = 0.63, p = 0.205) (Figure 6c). In addition, 18:3n-6, a product of Fads2 on 18:2n-6 was directly related to the fads2 expression in the egg at neurula stage (16 hps) (p < 0.10) (Figure 6d). When the eggs reached the heart appearance stage (30 hps), the DHA contents in eggs were inversely related to the fads2 expression in eggs (R2 = 0.73, p = 0.146), which was similar to the correlation at the neurula stage (Figure 7a). However, in contrast to the relation at the neurula stage, 18:2n-9 contents in eggs were directly related to the fads2 expression in the egg at the heart beating stage (30 hps) (R2 = 0.95, p = 0.027) (Figure 7b). The ratios between precursors and products of ∆6 desaturation, 18:3n-6/18:2n-6 and 18:4n-3/18:3n-3, directly related to the fads2 expression in the eggs (Figure 7c,d).

3.4. Influence of Broodstock Diet in Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis

No significant (p > 0.05) difference was observed on fads2 expression during embryogenesis between eggs from broodstock fed with a diet rich in FO (LFO broodstock) or RO (LRO broodstock), which followed a similar positive linear regression (p < 0.001) (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

The present study aimed to determine the temporal changes of fads2 expression during the ontogeny of gilthead seabream and the potential influence of broodstock diet and the parental ability to express fads2. Overall, the results showed the presence of fads2 mRNA even in just spawned egg, denoting the maternal mRNA transfer to the developing oocyte. Then, from the neurula stage onwards, fads2 expression increased, denoting the transition from maternal to embryonic gene expression. Regarding the broodstock, eggs obtained from parents with high fads2 expression showed a high DHA content, together with the downregulation of fads2 expression. Finally, the partial replacement of FO by RO did not affect LC-PUFA contents nor fads2 expression in gilthead sea bream eggs.

4.1. Changes of fads2 mRNA in Gilthead Seabream Eggs during Ontogeny

The use of gilthead seabream broodstock with a high ability to express fads2 when fed low FO diets improves reproductive success [22]. However, their consequences on the fads2 expression in the offspring, particularly during the development of embryo and larvae, have not been yet studied. This is partly due to the lack of knowledge on the ontogeny of fads2 expression. The present study has demonstrated that in gilthead seabream, fads2 expression can be detected even in the just spawned egg (0 hps) immediately after fertilization. These results are in agreement with the presence of fatty acid desaturase gene (fad) expression in zebrafish zygote [31] and denote a maternal mRNA transfer to the developing oocyte. Despite that maternal mRNA transfer would be proven by the presence of transcripts in unfertilized eggs, no differences were found in mRNA expressions between unfertilized and 1.5 h post-fertilized zebrafish eggs, denoting that just fertilized or just spawn eggs are useful to study maternal transfer mRNAs [39]. In fish, maternal mRNAs produced by the mother based on her genome are incorporated into the developing oocytes at very early stages of oogenesis [40]. Despite maternal transcripts may originally be distributed throughout the oocyte cytoplasm, after fertilization most of them are pulled into the blastodisc through cytoplasmic streaming or ooplasmic segregation [41,42]. There, from mid-blastula on-wards, maternal mRNAs become important components of the protein translation machinery contributing to the proper embryogenesis, and their expression is being regulated by their stability and degradation [40]. In seabream, fads2 mRNA copies were constant during morula (4 hps), blastula (6 hps) and gastrula stages (10 hps) and decreased at the neurula stage (16 hps) suggesting the degradation of the maternal fads2 mRNA at this stage.
From the neurula stage onwards, a significant increase was observed in the seabream fads2 expression, denoting the transition from maternal to embryonic gene expression. At the neurula stage the embryo has already established the bases for the development of the principal organs and systems, including neural and circulatory systems, and the increased fads2 expression may contribute to fulfill the LC-PUFA requirements for organ development [6]. LC-PUFAs, and specially DHA, are necessary for brain development and functioning in seabream as in other vertebrates [43]. In agreement with this, fad is particularly expressed in the head area of zebrafish [31]. Indeed, fads2 expression in gilthead seabream was significantly upregulated at heart beating, when brain development becomes very notorious, and remained increasing during the hatching and 3-day-old larvae stages. These results were relatively different from those obtained in zebrafish, where fad expression is claimed to increase earlier during embryo development, from 12 h post fertilization onwards [31]. Nevertheless, these conclusions in zebrafish are based on comparisons of transcript levels from RT-PCR analyses and have to be made cautiously, as stated by the authors [31], whereas the present study was based on digital PCR determining absolute quantification mRNA copies with nine replicates for each developmental stage. Indeed, rather than at 12 h, a more evident increase in fad expression was observed at 19 h post fertilization [31], coinciding with the late segmentation stage in zebrafish when organogenesis occurs [44], in agreement with our findings in gilthead seabream. Therefore, a marked upregulation of the embryo fads2 expression was found after the neurula stages, particularly from heart beating, suggesting that the determination of fads2 expression in the offspring embryo should be conducted from this stage onwards to prevent the potential influence of the maternal mRNA.

4.2. Influence of Parental fads2 Expression in Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis

The regression lines for the temporal expression of fads2 during the ontogenesis of seabream offspring from high or low fads2 expressing broodstock crossed at 10 hps, denoting a higher number of mRNA copies in offspring from high fads2 expressing broodstock. This observation would be in agreement with the maternal transfer of fads2 mRNA previously discussed. Interestingly, in later developmental stages, the fads2 expression tended to be lower in offspring from broodstock with high fads2 expression, as it was supported by the significant negative relation between fads2 expression in broodstock and offspring at neurula or, particularly, heart beating stages. This downregulation of fads2 expression in offspring from broodstock with higher fads2 expression, seemed to be due to their increased DHA content in the eggs in comparison to those from lower fads2 expression broodstock. The maternal transfer of DHA into fish eggs may occur during endogenous vitellogenesis by the synthesis in the ovaries of lipid vesicles that will lead to the oil globule, or exogenous vitellogenesis by the synthesis of vitellogenin in the liver forming the lipoprotein yolk lipids [45,46]. In gilthead seabream broodstock, fads2 is expressed in both tissues, but specially in the liver, where it increases the production of LC-PUFAs, particularly, DHA [22]. Whereas in seabream male broodstock, DHA in liver increases proportionally to the hepatic expression of fads2, in the females DHA does not accumulate in the liver [22], but it is incorporated into vitellogenin and transferred into the developing oocytes. In agreement, in the present study, DHA contents in the eggs were positively correlated to the fads2 expression in the broodstock, particularly females, denoting the maternal transfer of DHA. DHA is highly demanded during embryogenesis and larval development to sustain growth, being the most abundant fatty acid in the eggs of many fish species [19,47]. DHA can resist membrane packing, regulate membrane fluidity and has a structural function on the cell membrane, directly promoting growth [6]. In addition, it is a precursor of docosanoids, which function as local hormones (autacoids) with autocrine and paracrine functions targeting cells in the area where they are formed, and are involved in the regulation of a wide array of cellular pathways and cascades, including cell proliferation and differentiation [6].
In turn, increased DHA contents in the seabream eggs were inversely related to fads2 expression in embryos at neurula and heart appearance stages, denoting the downregulation of fads2 expression by DHA as observed during the whole fish life cycle [25,48,49]. Indeed, feeding a FO diet with high levels of LC-PUFAs, particularly DHA, inhibits fads2 expression in comparison to a vegetable oil diet low in these fatty acids [26,48,49,50]. In mammals, the presence of LC-PUFAs restricts the level FADS2 through the E-box like sterol regulatory element [51]. Studies on the compartmental location of fatty acids during fish ontogeny have shown that despite DHA is initially found in the yolk, this fatty acid is preferentially incorporated into structural lipids in the embryo tissues [52], where it would downregulate fads2 expression. Thus, the higher the fads2 expression in the broodstock, the higher the incorporation of DHA into the eggs, and as such the increased incorporation of DHA inhibited the fads2 expression in the eggs.
In agreement, the eggs obtained from low fads2 parents showed low DHA contents and a high fads2 expression, associated with the increased ∆6-activity on n-3 and n-6 precursors as denoted by the increase in the ratio of synthesis from 18:3n-6 to 18:2n-6, or from 18:4n-3 to 18:3n-3. In addition, high fads2 expression in the egg was also associated to a reduction in ∆8-desaturase activity as denoted by the reduction in the ratio of synthesis of 20:4n-3 from 20:3n-3. The ∆8-desaturase activity is an alternative but a minor pathway for LC-PUFA biosynthesis, more active when there is a high demand of eicosanoid synthesis [21,53]. The study of this alternate pathway in baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) with a mammals FADS2 gene showed that the activity of ∆6-desaturase is higher than that of ∆8-desaturase by 7.2-fold on n-6 fatty acids and by 23-fold on n-3 fatty acids [53]. In agreement, the negative correlation of the ∆8 activity and fads2 expression in gilthead seabream embryos could be related with the activation of ∆6 activity of Fads2 in the embryos with lower DHA content.

4.3. Influence of Broodstock Diet in Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis

FO has been partly replaced by RO in broodstock diets, in order to induce nutritional programing in the offspring for a better utilization of low FM and low FO diets [27]. Since dietary LC-PUFAs, high in FO, are required for good spawning quality in fish [47], FO content in broodstock diets can be replaced by RO for nutritional programing purposes, but not as much as to reduce spawning quality [10]. However, their effect in the temporal expression of fads2 during gilthead seabream ontogenesis has not been studied. In the present study, feeding the same broodstock diets as in previous studies [22] did not affect fads2 expression during embryogenesis. Even though the dietary LC-PUFA levels were slightly different, the LC-PUFA contents in the eggs were similar. Despite the egg contents in LC-PUFAs being usually correlated to the LC-PUFA levels in broodstock diets, there is a preferential retention of these fatty acids in the eggs, particularly in species with oligolecythic eggs, such as gilthead seabream and therefore, small dietary differences may not be reflected in the fatty acid profiles of the eggs [47,54]. Moreover, the optimum LC-PUFA content of gilthead sea bream broodstock during spawning season is 11.27% of the total fatty acid in the diet [54] and both broodstock diets in the present study fulfill these requirements. Thus, the similarity of the LC-PUFA content in eggs can explain why there was no difference on the fads2 expression in eggs from the broodstock fed different lipid sources. These results agree well with the lack of effect of these diets on fads2 expression in gilthead seabream eggs [22]. However, more extreme diets may affect the expression of LC-PUFA biosynthesis-related genes. For instance, in Solea senegalensis, feeding broodstock with a diet markedly higher in LC-PUFAs suppresses elovl5 expression in eggs [55]. Further studies with diets containing extreme levels of LC-PUFAs should be conducted to understand the effect of broodstock diets on the expression of genes related to LC-PUFA biosynthesis.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the results of the present study showed the presence of fads2 mRNA in the just spawned gilthead seabream egg, denoting the maternal mRNA transfer to the developing oocyte, whereas from the neurula stage onwards, the fads2 expression increased, denoting the transition from maternal to embryonic gene expression. In addition, the eggs obtained from broodstock with high fads2 expression showed a high DHA content, which could be responsible for the downregulation of fads2 expression in the developing embryo and larvae. Finally, the partial replacement of FO by rapeseed oil did not affect LC-PUFA contents nor fads2 expression in gilthead seabream eggs.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/11/2191/s1, Table S1: Ingredients of the experimental diets used to feed broodstock during the spawning season, Table S2: Fatty acid composition of the experimental diets used to feed broodstock during the spawning season, Table S3: Fatty acid composition of eggs at 24hps from broodstock fed a RO diet during spawning and showing either high (HRO) or low (LRO) expression of fads2.

Author Contributions

Design of the experiment, M.I., S.F., S.T. and H.X.; feeding experiments, biological, biochemical and molecular analyses, S.F. and H.X.; molecular analysis supervision, M.J.Z. and J.M.A.; manuscript writing, M.I. and H.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the EU-funded project PerformFISH, grant number H2020-SFS-2016-2017; 727610) and China scholarship council.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Skretting ARC (Stavanger, Norway) for providing the experimental diets.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

LC-PUFAslong chain polyunsaturated fatty acids
DHAdocosahexaenoic acid
EPAeicosapentaenoic acid
ARAarachidonic acid
FOfish oil
fadsfatty acyl desaturase
FMfishmeal
hpshour post spawning
SFAsaturated fatty acid
MUFAmonounsaturated fatty acid
S.D.standard deviation

References

  1. Calder, P.C. Mechanisms of Action of (n-3) Fatty Acids. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 592S–599S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Watanabe, T. Importance of Docosahexaenoic Acid in Marine Larval Fish. J. World Aquac. Soc. 1993, 24, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wassall, S.R.; Stillwell, W. Docosahexaenoic acid domains: The ultimate non-raft membrane domain. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2008, 153, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gill, I.; Valivety, R. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, part 1: Occurrence, biological activities and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 1997, 15, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peng, S.; Yue, Y.; Gao, Q.; Shi, Z.; Yin, F.; Wang, J. Influence of dietary n-3 LC-PUFA on growth, nutritional composition and immune function in marine fish Sebastiscus marmoratus. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2014, 32, 1000–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Izquierdo, M.; Koven, W. Digestive development and nutrient requirements. In Larval Fish Nutrition; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Chichester, UK, 2011; pp. 47–81. [Google Scholar]
  7. Menoyo, D.; Izquierdo, M.S.; Robaina, L.; Ginés, R.; Lopez-Bote, C.J.; Bautista, J.M. Adaptation of lipid metabolism, tissue composition and flesh quality in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) to the replacement of dietary fish oil by linseed and soyabean oils. Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 92, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Torrecillas, S.; Robaina, L.; Caballero, M.; Montero, D.; Calandra, G.; Mompel, D.; Karalazos, V.; Kaushik, S.; Izquierdo, M. Combined replacement of fishmeal and fish oil in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax): Production performance, tissue composition and liver morphology. Aquaculture 2017, 474, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carvalho, M.; Montero, D.; Rosenlund, G.; Fontanillas, R.; Ginés, R.; Izquierdo, M. Effective complete replacement of fish oil by combining poultry and microalgae oils in practical diets for gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) fingerlings. Aquaculture 2020, 529, 735696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Izquierdo, M.; Turkmen, S.; Montero, D.; Zamorano, M.; Afonso, J.; Karalazos, V.; Fernández-Palacios, H. Nutritional programming through broodstock diets to improve utilization of very low fishmeal and fish oil diets in gilthead sea bream. Aquaculture 2015, 449, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pereira, S.L.; Leonard, A.E.; Mukerji, P. Recent advances in the study of fatty acid desaturases from animals and lower eukaryotes. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2003, 68, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lopes-Marques, M.; Kabeya, N.; Qian, Y.; Ruivo, R.; Santos, M.M.; Venkatesh, B.; Tocher, D.R.; Castro, L.F.C.; Monroig, Ó. Retention of fatty acyl desaturase 1 (fads1) in Elopomorpha and Cyclostomata provides novel insights into the evolution of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in vertebrates. BMC Evol. Biol. 2018, 18, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sprecher, H. Metabolism of highly unsaturated n-3 and n-6 fatty acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2000, 1486, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dong, X.; Tan, P.; Cai, Z.; Xu, H.; Li, J.; Ren, W.; Xu, H.; Zuo, R.; Zhou, J.; Mai, K.; et al. Regulation of FADS2 transcription by SREBP-1 and PPAR-α influences LC-PUFA biosynthesis in fish. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tocher, D.R.; Ghioni, C. Fatty acid metabolism in marine fish: Low activity of fatty acyl Δ5 desaturation in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) cells. Lipids 1999, 34, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vagner, M.; Santigosa, E. Characterization and modulation of gene expression and enzymatic activity of delta-6 desaturase in teleosts: A review. Aquaculture 2011, 315, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tocher, D.R.; Zheng, X.; Schlechtriem, C.; Hastings, N.; Dick, J.R.; Teale, A.J. Highly unsaturated fatty acid synthesis in marine fish: Cloning, functional characterization, and nutritional regulation of fatty acyl Δ6 desaturase of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Lipids 2006, 41, 1003–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sargent, J.R.; Tocher, D.R.; Bell, J.G. The lipids. In Fish Nutrition, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2003; pp. 181–257. [Google Scholar]
  19. Izquierdo, M.S. Essential fatty acid requirements of cultured marine fish larvae. Aquac. Nutr. 1996, 2, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kabeya, N.; Yoshizaki, G.; Tocher, D.R.; Monroig, Ó. Diversification of Fads2 in finfish species: Implications for aquaculture. In Investigación y Desarrollo en Nutrición Acuícola; Cruz-Suarez, L.E., Ricque-Marie, D., Tapia-Salazar, M., Nieto-López, M.G., Villarreal-Cavazos, D.A., Gamboa-Delgado, J., López Acuña, L.M., Galaviz-Espinoza, M., Eds.; Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León San Nicolás de los Garza: Nuevo León, México, 2017; pp. 338–362. ISBN 978-607-27-0822-8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Monroig, Ó.; Li, Y.; Tocher, D.R. Delta-8 desaturation activity varies among fatty acyl desaturases of teleost fish: High activity in delta-6 desaturases of marine species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 159, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ferosekhan, S.; Xu, H.; Turkmen, S.; Gómez, A.; Afonso, J.M.; Fontanillas, R.; Rosenlund, G.; Kaushik, S.; Izquierdo, M. Reproductive performance of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) broodstock showing different expression of fatty acyl desaturase 2 and fed two dietary fatty acid profiles. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ferosekhan, S.; Turkmen, S.; Xu, H.; Afonso, J.M.; Zamorano, M.J.; Kaushik, S.J.; Izquierdo, M. The Relationship between the Expression of Fatty Acyl Desaturase 2 (fads2) Gene in Peripheral Blood Cells (PBCs) and Liver in Gilthead Seabream, Sparus aurata Broodstock Fed a Low n-3 LC-PUFA Diet. Life 2020, 10, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bell, J.G.; Henderson, R.J.; Tocher, D.R.; McGhee, F.; Dick, J.R.; Porter, A.; Smullen, R.P.; Sargent, J.R. Substituting Fish Oil with Crude Palm Oil in the Diet of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Affects Muscle Fatty Acid Composition and Hepatic Fatty Acid Metabolism. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Gregory, M.K.; Collins, R.O.; Tocher, D.R.; James, M.J.; Turchini, G.M. Nutritional regulation of long-chain PUFA biosynthetic genes in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 1721–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Xu, H.; Dong, X.; Ai, Q.; Mai, K.; Xu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zuo, R. Regulation of Tissue LC-PUFA Contents, Δ6 Fatty Acyl Desaturase (FADS2) Gene Expression and the Methylation of the Putative FADS2 Gene Promoter by Different Dietary Fatty Acid Profiles in Japanese Seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Turkmen, S.; Perera, E.; Zamorano, M.J.; Simó-Mirabet, P.; Xu, H.; Pérez-Sánchez, J.; Izquierdo, M. Effects of Dietary Lipid Composition and Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 Expression in Broodstock Gilthead Sea Bream on Lipid Metabolism-Related Genes and Methylation of the fads2 Gene Promoter in Their Offspring. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Turkmen, S.; Zamorano, M.J.; Fernández-Palacios, H.; Hernández-Cruz, C.M.; Montero, D.; Robaina, L.; Izquierdo, M. Parental nutritional programming and a reminder during juvenile stage affect growth, lipid metabolism and utilisation in later developmental stages of a marine teleost, the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Br. J. Nutr. 2017, 118, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lazzarotto, V.; Corraze, G.; Larroquet, L.; Mazurais, D.; Médale, F. Does broodstock nutritional history affect the response of progeny to different first-feeding diets? A whole-body transcriptomic study of rainbow trout alevins. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 2079–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lazzarotto, V.; Corraze, G.; Leprévost, A.; Quillet, E.; Dupont-Nivet, M.; Médale, F. Three-Year Breeding Cycle of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Fed a Plant-Based Diet, Totally Free of Marine Resources: Consequences for Reproduction, Fatty Acid Composition and Progeny Survival. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Monroig, Ó.; Rotllant, J.; Sánchez, E.; Cerdá-Reverter, J.M.; Tocher, D.R. Expression of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA) biosynthesis genes during zebrafish Danio rerio early embryogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2009, 1791, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Tanomman, S.; Ketudat-Cairns, M.; Jangprai, A.; Boonanuntanasarn, S. Characterization of fatty acid delta-6 desaturase gene in Nile tilapia and heterogenous expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 166, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Torres, M.; Navarro, J.; Varó, I.; Agulleiro, M.; Morais, S.; Monroig, Ó.; Hontoria, F. Expression of genes related to long-chain (C18–22) and very long-chain (>C24) fatty acid biosynthesis in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) and Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) larvae: Investigating early ontogeny and nutritional regulation. Aquaculture 2020, 520, 734949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Turkmen, S.; Hernández-Cruz, C.M.; Zamorano, M.J.; Fernández-Palacios, H.; Montero, D.; Afonso, J.M.; Izquierdo, M. Long-chain PUFA profiles in parental diets induce long-term effects on growth, fatty acid profiles, expression of fatty acid desaturase 2 and selected immune system-related genes in the offspring of gilthead seabream. Br. J. Nutr. 2019, 122, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kamacı, H.O.; Saka, Ş.; Fırat, K. The Cleavage and Embryonic Phase of Gilthead Sea Bream (Sparus aurata Linnaeus, 1758) Eggs. EgeJFAS 2005, 22, 205–209. [Google Scholar]
  36. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Stanley, G.S. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Christie, W. Equivalent chain-lengths of methyl ester derivatives of fatty acids on gas chromatography A reappraisal. J. Chromatogr. A 1988, 447, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Takeuchi, T.; Toyota, M.; Satoh, S.; Watanabe, T. Requirement of juvenile red seabream Pagrus major for eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1990, 56, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vergauwen, L.; Cavallin, J.E.; Ankley, G.T.; Bars, C.; Gabriëls, I.J.; Michiels, E.D.; Fitzpatrick, K.R.; Periz-Stanacev, J.; Randolph, E.C.; Robinson, S.L.; et al. Gene transcription ontogeny of hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis development in early-life stage fathead minnow and zebrafish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2018, 266, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cheung, C.T.; Pasquier, J.; Bouleau, A.; Nguyen, T.; Chesnel, F.; Guiguen, Y.; Bobe, J. Double maternal-effect: Duplicated nucleoplasmin 2 genes, npm2a and npm2b, with essential but distinct functions are shared by fish and tetrapods. BMC Evol. Biol. 2018, 18, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Howley, C.; Ho, R.K. mRNA localization patterns in zebrafish oocytes. Mech. Dev. 2000, 92, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fuentes, R.; Fernández, J. Ooplasmic segregation in the zebrafish zygote and early embryo: Pattern of ooplasmic movements and transport pathways. Dev. Dyn. 2010, 239, 2172–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Benítez-Santana, T.; Atalah, E.; Betancor, M.B.; Caballero, M.; Hernandez-Cruz, C.M.; Izquierdo, M. DHA but not EPA, enhances sound induced escape behavior and Mauthner cells activity in Sparus aurata. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 124, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Karlstrom, R.O.; Kane, D.A. A flipbook of zebrafish embryogenesis. Development 1996, 123, 461. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Poupard, G.; André, M.; Durliat, M.; Ballagny, C.; Boeuf, G.; Babin, P.J. Apolipoprotein E gene expression correlates with endogenous lipid nutrition and yolk syncytial layer lipoprotein synthesis during fish development. Cell Tissue Res. 2000, 300, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wiegand, M.D. Utilization of yolk fatty acids by goldfish embryos and larvae. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 1996, 15, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Izquierdo, M.; Fernández-Palacios, H.; Tacon, A. Effect of broodstock nutrition on reproductive performance of fish. Aquaculture 2001, 197, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Izquierdo, M.S.; Robaina, L.; Juárez-Carrillo, E.; Oliva, V.; Hernández-Cruz, C.M.; Afonso, J.M. Regulation of growth, fatty acid composition and delta 6 desaturase expression by dietary lipids in gilthead seabream larvae (Sparus aurata). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 34, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, S.; Mai, K.; Xu, W.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ai, Q. Characterization, mRNA expression and regulation of Δ6 fatty acyl desaturase (FADS2) by dietary n−3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA) levels in grouper larvae (Epinephelus coioides). Aquaculture 2014, 434, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vagner, M.; Infante, J.Z.; Robin, J.; Ruyet, J.P.-L. Is it possible to influence European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juvenile metabolism by a nutritional conditioning during larval stage? Aquaculture 2007, 267, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Nara, T.Y.; He, W.S.; Tang, C.; Clarke, S.D.; Nakamura, M.T. The E-box like sterol regulatory element mediates the suppression of human Δ-6 desaturase gene by highly unsaturated fatty acids. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 296, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jaroszewska, M.; Dabrowski, K. Utilization of yolk: Transition from endogenous to exogenous nutrition in fish. In Larval Fish Nutrition; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Chichester, UK, 2011; pp. 183–218. [Google Scholar]
  53. Park, W.J.; Kothapalli, K.S.D.; Lawrence, P.; Tyburczy, C.; Brenna, J.T. An alternate pathway to long-chain polyunsaturates: The FADS2 gene product Δ8-desaturates 20:2n-6 and 20:3n-3. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 1195–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Fernández-Palacios, H.; Izquierdo, M.S.; Robaina, L.; Valencia, A.; Salhi, M.; Vergara, J. Effect of n-3 HUFA level in broodstock diets on egg quality of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Aquaculture 1995, 132, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Morais, S.; Mendes, A.C.; Castanheira, M.F.; Coutinho, J.; Bandarra, N.M.; Dias, J.; Conceicao, L.E.; Ferreira, P.P. New formulated diets for Solea senegalensis broodstock: Effects of parental nutrition on biosynthesis of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and performance of early larval stages and juvenile fish. Aquaculture 2014, 432, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 10 02191 g001 550
Figure 1. Timeline of the selected point during embryogenesis. The timeline is based on the description of stage during the embryogenesis of gilthead sea bream by Kamacı et al. 2005 [35] under experimental conditions.
Figure 1. Timeline of the selected point during embryogenesis. The timeline is based on the description of stage during the embryogenesis of gilthead sea bream by Kamacı et al. 2005 [35] under experimental conditions.
Animals 10 02191 g001
Animals 10 02191 g002 550
Figure 2. Temporal changes in fatty acid desaturase 2 (fads2) mRNA copies during gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) ontogenesis, from 0 to 125 h after spawning. Different letters denote significant differences among developmental stages (p < 0.05, n = 15). Bars bearing with different letter showed significant difference by one-way ANOVA analysis (p < 0.05). y, fads2 expression of egg; x, time after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 2. Temporal changes in fatty acid desaturase 2 (fads2) mRNA copies during gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) ontogenesis, from 0 to 125 h after spawning. Different letters denote significant differences among developmental stages (p < 0.05, n = 15). Bars bearing with different letter showed significant difference by one-way ANOVA analysis (p < 0.05). y, fads2 expression of egg; x, time after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Animals 10 02191 g002
Animals 10 02191 g003 550
Figure 3. Influence of parental fatty acid desaturase 2 (fads2) expression (high: HRO or low: LRO) on temporal changes in fads2 mRNA copies during gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) ontogenesis, from 0 to 125 h after spawning (n = 3). No significant difference was observed in the comparison using t-test (p > 0.05). y, fads2 expression of egg; x, time after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 3. Influence of parental fatty acid desaturase 2 (fads2) expression (high: HRO or low: LRO) on temporal changes in fads2 mRNA copies during gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) ontogenesis, from 0 to 125 h after spawning (n = 3). No significant difference was observed in the comparison using t-test (p > 0.05). y, fads2 expression of egg; x, time after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Animals 10 02191 g003
Animals 10 02191 g004 550
Figure 4. Relations of fads2 mRNA copies between the egg at neurula stage (16 hps) and female (a) or male (b) broodstock (including both HRO and LRO broodstock), or between egg at the heart appearance stage (30 hps) and female (c) or male (d) broodstock. y, fads2 expression of egg; x, fads2 expression of broodstock; R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 4. Relations of fads2 mRNA copies between the egg at neurula stage (16 hps) and female (a) or male (b) broodstock (including both HRO and LRO broodstock), or between egg at the heart appearance stage (30 hps) and female (c) or male (d) broodstock. y, fads2 expression of egg; x, fads2 expression of broodstock; R2, coefficient of determination.
Animals 10 02191 g004
Animals 10 02191 g005 550
Figure 5. Relations between the DHA contents in the egg at 24 h after spawning and fads2 mRNA copies of female (a) or male (b) broodstock (including both HRO and LRO broodstock). y, DHA content is eggs; x, fads2 expression of broodstock; R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 5. Relations between the DHA contents in the egg at 24 h after spawning and fads2 mRNA copies of female (a) or male (b) broodstock (including both HRO and LRO broodstock). y, DHA content is eggs; x, fads2 expression of broodstock; R2, coefficient of determination.
Animals 10 02191 g005
Animals 10 02191 g006 550
Figure 6. Relations between the fads2 mRNA copies of egg at 16 h after spawning and the content of DHA (a), ratio 20:4n-3/20:3n-3 (b), 18:2n-9 (c) and 18:3n-6 (d) in eggs at 24 h after spawning (including eggs from both HRO and LRO broodstock). y, respective fatty acids in eggs at 24 h after spawning; x, fads2 expression of egg at 16 h after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 6. Relations between the fads2 mRNA copies of egg at 16 h after spawning and the content of DHA (a), ratio 20:4n-3/20:3n-3 (b), 18:2n-9 (c) and 18:3n-6 (d) in eggs at 24 h after spawning (including eggs from both HRO and LRO broodstock). y, respective fatty acids in eggs at 24 h after spawning; x, fads2 expression of egg at 16 h after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Animals 10 02191 g006
Animals 10 02191 g007a 550Animals 10 02191 g007b 550
Figure 7. Relations between fads2 mRNA copies of egg at 30 h after spawning with the content of DHA (a), 18:2n-9 (b), ratio 18:3n-6/18:2n-6 (c) and 18:4n-3/18:3n-3 (d) in eggs at 24 h after spawning (including eggs from both HRO and LRO broodstock). y, respective fatty acids in eggs at 24 h after spawning; x, fads2 expression of eggs at 30 h after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 7. Relations between fads2 mRNA copies of egg at 30 h after spawning with the content of DHA (a), 18:2n-9 (b), ratio 18:3n-6/18:2n-6 (c) and 18:4n-3/18:3n-3 (d) in eggs at 24 h after spawning (including eggs from both HRO and LRO broodstock). y, respective fatty acids in eggs at 24 h after spawning; x, fads2 expression of eggs at 30 h after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Animals 10 02191 g007aAnimals 10 02191 g007b
Animals 10 02191 g008 550
Figure 8. Changes in fads2 expression during gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) ontogenesis, from 0 to 125 h after spawning (n = 3) from broodstock with a low expression of fads2 and fed either a FO (LFO) or a RO (LRO) diet during spawning. y, fads2 expression of egg; x, time after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Figure 8. Changes in fads2 expression during gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) ontogenesis, from 0 to 125 h after spawning (n = 3) from broodstock with a low expression of fads2 and fed either a FO (LFO) or a RO (LRO) diet during spawning. y, fads2 expression of egg; x, time after spawning; R2, coefficient of determination.
Animals 10 02191 g008
Table
Table 1. Average fads2 expression in the peripheral blood cells of the broodstock individuals used in the present study.
Table 1. Average fads2 expression in the peripheral blood cells of the broodstock individuals used in the present study.
GroupGenderfads2 Expression (Copies/μL)
HRO (High fas2 + RO diet)Female 114.92
Male 1-17.06
Male 1-23.37
Female 212.72
Male 2-14.09
Male 2-23.33
LRO (Low fas2 + RO diet)Female 31.41
Male 3-11.53
Male 3-21.46
Female 40.49
Male 4-11.74
Male 4-21.66
LFO (low fas2 + FO diet)Female 51.11
Male 5-11.26
Male 5-21.27
FO, fish oil; RO, rapeseed meal.
Table
Table 2. Main fatty acids of eggs at 24 hps from broodstock fed an RO diet during spawning and showing either a high (HRO) or low (LRO) expression of fads2.
Table 2. Main fatty acids of eggs at 24 hps from broodstock fed an RO diet during spawning and showing either a high (HRO) or low (LRO) expression of fads2.
Fatty AcidsHROLRO
MeanS.D.MeanS.D.
18:1n-927.061.0319.697.04
18:2n-90.100.020.330.13
18.2n-610.810.248.631.76
18:3n-60.200.040.560.15
18:3n-32.920.122.200.53
18:4n-30.530.011.020.58
20:4n-60.760.030.780.01
20:5n-35.950.106.983.49
22:4n-60.080.020.63 *0.07
22:5n-60.250.040.60 *0.04
22:6n-320.45 *0.6413.990.21
SFA16.760.3625.38 *0.31
MUFA35.740.8231.765.30
PUFA47.491.2042.874.97
n-3 FA33.840.8328.015.15
n-6 FA12.670.3812.061.42
DHA/ARA26.91 *0.1617.940.05
DHA/EPA3.440.052.281.11
* denotes the significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). ARA, arachidonic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; FA, fatty acid; SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; S.D. standard deviation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, H.; Ferosekhan, S.; Turkmen, S.; Afonso, J.M.; Zamorano, M.J.; Izquierdo, M. Influence of Parental Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 (fads2) Expression and Diet on Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis. Animals 2020, 10, 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112191

AMA Style

Xu H, Ferosekhan S, Turkmen S, Afonso JM, Zamorano MJ, Izquierdo M. Influence of Parental Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 (fads2) Expression and Diet on Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis. Animals. 2020; 10(11):2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Hanlin, Shajahan Ferosekhan, Serhat Turkmen, Juan Manuel Afonso, María Jesús Zamorano, and Marisol Izquierdo. 2020. "Influence of Parental Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 (fads2) Expression and Diet on Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis" Animals 10, no. 11: 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112191

APA Style

Xu, H., Ferosekhan, S., Turkmen, S., Afonso, J. M., Zamorano, M. J., & Izquierdo, M. (2020). Influence of Parental Fatty Acid Desaturase 2 (fads2) Expression and Diet on Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata) Offspring fads2 Expression during Ontogenesis. Animals, 10(11), 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112191

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop