Next Article in Journal
Differential Dynamics of the Ruminal Microbiome of Jersey Cows in a Heat Stress Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Glucocorticoid Receptor Agonists to Improve the Productivity and Health of Early-Weaned Pigs: What Is the Best Method of Delivery?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/ani10071125
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Social Rank upon Estrus Induction and Some Reproductive Outcomes in Anestrus Goats Treated With Progesterone + eCG

by
Santiago Zuñiga-Garcia
1,
Cesar A. Meza-Herrera
2,
Adela Mendoza-Cortina
2,
Julio Otal-Salaverri
3,
Carlos Perez-Marin
4,
Noé M. Lopez-Flores
2,4,
Evaristo Carrillo
5,
Guadalupe Calderon-Leyva
1,
Ulises N. Gutierrez-Guzman
6 and
Francisco G. Veliz-Deras
1,*
1
Unidad Laguna, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Periférico Raúl López Sánchez y Carretera a Santa Fe, 27054 Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico
2
Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, 35230 Bermejillo, Durango, Mexico
3
Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
4
Instituto de Estudios de Posgrado, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain
5
Instituto Tecnológico de Torreón, 27170 Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico
6
Facultad de Agricultura y Zootecnia, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, 35111 Venecia, Durango, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(7), 1125; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071125
Submission received: 2 June 2020 / Revised: 27 June 2020 / Accepted: 29 June 2020 / Published: 2 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal System and Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The potential effect of social rank [R] (high—HSR; medium—MSR; low—LSR) in anestrus goats subjected to an estrus induction protocol (EIP) primed with progesterone (P4) and receiving a differential equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) dose [D] (D100 vs D350) upon some reproductive outcomes in crossbred dairy goats under intensive stall-fed conditions was evaluated. Response variables included estrus induction (EI, %), latency to estrus (LAT, h), duration of estrus (DUR, h), ovulation (OVU, %), ovulation rate (OR, n), corpus luteum size (CLS, cm), pregnancy (PREG, %), kidding (KIDD, %), and litter size (LS, n). Most of the response variables were positively affected by social rank, favoring to the HSR goats (i.e., EI %, DUR h, OVU %, OR n, and CLS cm). In addition, increased OR and PREG occurred in the HSR + D350 group, while D350 increased LS, irrespective of R. Interestingly, since no differences regarding LAT, DUR, OVU, CLS, PREG, and KIDD occurred between D350 and D100, the obtained values support the use of a reduced level of exogenous hormones to induce and generate out-of-season reproductive efficiency.

Abstract

We evaluated the possible role of the social rank [R] (i.e., low—LSR, middle—MSR, or high—HSR) in anestrus goats exposed to a P4 + eCG [D] (i.e., 100 or 350 IU) estrus induction protocol (EIP). Adult, multiparous (two to three lactations), multiracial, dairy-type goats (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian x Criollo goats (n = 70; 25°51′ North) managed under stall-fed conditions were all ultrasound evaluated to confirm anestrus status while the R was determined 30 d prior to the EIP. The variables of estrus induction (EI, %), estrus latency (LAT, h), estrus duration (DUR, h), ovulation (OVU, %), ovulation rate (OR, n), corpus luteum size (CLS, cm), pregnancy (PREG, %), kidding (KIDD, %), and litter size (LS, n) as affected by R, D, and the R × D interaction, were evaluated. While OVU and CLS favored (p < 0.05) HSR (96% and + 1.04 ± 0.07 cm), an increased (p < 0.05) LS occurred in D350 vs. D100 (2.06 ± 0.2 vs. 1.36 ± 0.2); neither R nor D affected (p > 0.05; 38.5%) KIDD. However, EI, LAT, DUR, OR, and PREG were affected by the R × D interaction. The HSR group had the largest (p < 0.05) EI % and DUR h, irrespective of D. The shortest (p < 0.05) LAT occurred in D350, irrespective of R. While the largest (p < 0.05) OR occurred in HSR and MSR within D350, the HSR + D350 group had the largest PREG (p < 0.05). These research outcomes are central to defining out-of-season reproductive strategies designed to attenuate seasonal reproduction in goats.

1. Introduction

The goat is a gregarious species [1,2,3] with a well-defined hierarchical structure and different social ranks coexist [2,4]. These social behavioral differences give individuals different opportunities not only to survive [2,3,5], but to express reproductive fitness and success in small ruminants, in either males or females [2,4,6,7]. Indeed, in mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus), the dominant females displayed a greater reproductive success regarding the number of kids born as compared to the subordinate goats [8]. Furthermore, in females of the Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica) in captivity, the dominant goats exhibited a greater number of estrus cycles and higher pregnancy rates, as compared to the subordinate goats [9]. Certainly, when exposed to the male effect, the hierarchically dominant Kashmir female goats responded in the first 4 h with not only higher luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses but also greater success when expressing estrus [7]. Furthermore, high socially ranked female goats exposed to the male effect had a significantly earlier ovulation and greater pregnancy rates compared to low socially ranked goats. Indeed, hierarchically dominant goats had longer contact periods with males, which were thus able to promote an enhanced sexual bio-stimulation and, therefore, induced increased reproductive outcomes [1]. Certainly, a longer male-to-female interaction during the male effect process promotes an increased secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH), mainly in dominant goats [7,10]. Moreover, when exposed to an estrus synchronization protocol, high-ranking goats had higher progesterone secretion during the maternal recognition stage of the pregnancy process relative to low or medium social ranks [11]. Similarly, in a superovulation protocol, the dominant goats presented a greater number of corpus lutea [12].
On the other hand, the goat is considered a seasonal short-day polyestrus breeder, which allows it to mate and give birth in a defined season of the year [13,14]. This reproductive seasonality causes milk, cheese, and meat to concentrate in some specific months of the year, causing economic losses to both producers [15] and industrializers [16,17]. To resolve this problem and to induce out-of-season sexual activity, diverse estrus-inducing hormone protocols have been used, obtaining interesting results regarding both estrus induction and ovulation [18]. Among the hormonal protocols to control reproductive activity in goats, are those progestogen-based protocols involving natural progesterone [19], fluorogestone acetate [20], or medroxyprogesterone acetate [21]. Those estrus induction protocols using progestogens are normally accompanied by the use of gonadotropins, such as human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) [22] or equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) [18].
Currently, animal production is aimed at sustainability, with a strict regulation regarding the use of exogenous hormones [18]. Therefore, any attempt to decrease the use of exogenous hormones for reproductive control is not only an interesting option but also a claimed area of research. The use of 100 IU of hCG has been shown to effectively induce reproductive activity in anestrus goats, obtaining similar results with conventional higher doses [12,23]. Nonetheless, in goats, there is little evidence regarding the relationship between social rank and the induction of sexual activity in goats subjected to a hormonal estrus-inducing protocol. Building on such findings, we hypothesized a differential response according to social rank in anestrus goats subjected to an intramuscular progesterone + eCG estrus induction protocol; while a better reproductive response is expected to occur in the HSR goats, we also propose that a similar reproductive performance will be observed in goats receiving either a high or a low eCG dose (i.e., 100 or 350 IU); this study aimed to answer such an inquiry.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. General

All the experimental procedures, methods, and the management of the trial experimental units used in this study were compliant with the guidelines for the ethical use, care, and welfare of animals in research at international [24] and national [25] levels, with institutional approval reference number UAAAN-UL-18-3059.

2.2. Location, Environmental Conditions, Animals, and their Management

The study was carried out in the Comarca Lagunera, Coahuila, northern Mexico (25°51’ North, 103°16’ West, 1190 m), during February and March of the natural anestrus season at this latitude [19,22]. Adult, multiparous (two to three lactations), multiracial, dairy-type goats (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) managed under intensive, stall-fed conditions were distributed into two homogeneous groups regarding live weight (LW, 41.9 ± 9.08 kg) and body condition (BC, 1.87 ± 0.04; scale from 1 to 4 [26]). The groups were housed in two pens with an area of 80 m2 each; fodder was provided three times a day (08:00, 13:00, and 17:00), including alfalfa hay and 200 g per goat/day of commercial concentrate (14% CP). Water and mineral salts were provided ad libitum. During the pre-trial stage, the anestrus status of goats was confirmed through two trans-rectal ultrasound scans, using a 7.5 MHz human prostate transducer (Aloka 500, MHz linear array; Corometrics Medical Systems, Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA). Prior to the ultrasound scan, the transducer was lubricated and then inserted into the goat’s rectum to determine the type of ovarian structures present in both ovaries. Goats with the presence of corpus lutea were discarded from the study. The central activities performed during the experimental period are depicted in Figure 1.

2.3. Behavioral Study, Social Rank, Treatment Groups, Measurements, and Response Variables

To determine the goat’s social rank, one month prior to the treatment group formation (i.e., the application of the eCG), a behavioral study was carried out in February as previously outlined [1]. The behavioral test was performed at feeding time (08:00, 13:00, and 17:00) during a 60 min period during the 7 days pre-trial period. Therefore, the main interactions exerted among breeding female goats were monitored for 180 min d-1, for a total of 1260 min (i.e., 21 h) during the whole pre-trial behavioral study. The following behavioral goat-to-goat interactions were documented: bumps, threats, shoves, chases, escapes, and evasions. All the agonistic interactions during each 60 min observation period (180 min per day) were recorded; the abovementioned agonistic interactions between two individuals that involved an instigator or a victim, whether or not physical contact occurred, and that resulted in the physical displacement of an animal, were therefore considered. With the information obtained from the agonistic interactions, that is, the result of either winning or being defeated, a success rate (IE) was calculated considering the following formula: IE = number of individuals able to displace/(number of individuals able to displace + number of individuals displaced). According to the obtained IE, goats were classified into three social ranks: low (LSR; IE 0 to 0.33), medium (MSR; IE 0.34 to 0.66) and high (HSR; IE 0.67 to 1) [1,10]. The ethogram considering the observed social hierarchy according to the average agonistic interactions of the response variables during the behavioral test within each social rank are presented in Table 1.
Once the anestrus status confirmation and the social rank was established (i.e., LSR, MSR, HSR), the confirmed social rank groups were returned to the pens; fodder was provided three times a day as described. Then, in mid-March, all goats received one intramuscular dose of 25 mg of progesterone (Progesvit®, Brovel, Mexico). One day later, the D100 group (n = 35) received 100 IU of eCG per female (Folligon®, Intervet, Mexico) while, simultaneously, the D350 group received 350 IU of eCG per female. Both progesterone and eCG doses were applied intramuscularly; the LSR, MSR, and HSR were randomly distributed within each eCG dose group.
Thereafter, the estrus activity was monitored daily from the day of eCG application until day 7 of the experimental period (Figure 1); the evaluation of estrus behavior was carried out twice a day (09:00 and 17:00 h) and lasted 15 min for each evaluation. To identify the estrus activity, a total of seven sexually active males were used; in order to prevent sexual intercourse, each buck was aproned. Previously, bucks were subjected to a hormonal treatment of testosterone to activate their sexual behavior and ensure libido [27]. Once the goat remained immobile and allowed the teaser-buck to mount, the onset of estrus was ruled. Subsequently, the apron was removed from the bucks and the female goats from both experimental groups were exposed to natural mounts for the first 12 h after the onset of the estrus.
The percentage of females in estrus was considered as the number of estrus females/total treated females × 100. Latency to estrus was defined as the time elapsed between the application of eCG and the first mount allowed by the goat. The duration of the estrus was considered as the interval between the first and the last mount allowed by the female. Ovulatory activity was measured 10 d after the application of the eCG, by means of a transrectal ultrasound (Figure 1). The percentage of goats that ovulated was considered as the total of females that ovulated/total treated females × 100. The ovulatory rate was defined as the total number of corpus lutea per group compared to the total number of ovulating goats. The pregnancy rate was evaluated by means of a transrectal ultrasound at 45 d after the application of the eCG. Therefore, the response variables included: estrus induction (EI, %), latency to estrus (LAT, h), duration of estrus (DUR, h), ovulation (OVU, %), ovulation rate (OR, n), corpus luteum size (CLS, cm), pregnancy (PREG, %), kidding (KIDD, %), and litter size (LS, n). Due to the fact that the definition of the social rank status in each goat was individually classified, each goat within the eCG dose treatment group was defined as an experimental unit.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

The statistical design was a completely randomized 3 × 2 factorial arrangement with three social ranks (i.e., LSR, MSR, HSR) and two eCG doses (i.e., 100 or 350 IU). The response variables were ANOVA analyzed; the model included the independent variables dose, social rank, and the interaction, with each animal considered as a single experimental unit [28]. In the event of a significant effect, least square mean separation considered the PDIFF option; the analyses were solved by means of the GLM procedures of SAS. Because of their non-normal distribution, categorical variables were analyzed through the CATMOD procedure of SAS. All the analyses were computed through the procedures of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc. Version 9.4, 2016, Cary, NC, USA); the significance level was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Social Rank and the eCG Dose upon the Response Variables

The dependent variables estrus induction live weight (LW, kg), body condition (BC, units), (EI, %), latency to estrus (LAT, h), duration of estrus (DUR, h), ovulation (OVU, %), ovulation rate (OR, n), corpus luteum size (CLS, cm), pregnancy (PREG, %), kidding (KIDD, %), and litter size (LS, n) as affected by the social rank [R] (i.e., HSR, MSR and LSR) and eCG dose [D] (i.e., 100 or 350 IU), as well as the R × D interaction, are shown in Table 2.
While LW was affected (p < 0.05) by social rank, observing the best LW values in both the HSR and MSR, the lowest LW occurred in the LSR and no LW differences (p > 0.05) occurred between eCG doses. Moreover, neither R, nor D or even the R × D interaction affected the phenotypic expression of BC. The response variables OVU and CLS favored (p < 0.05) the HSR (96% and 1.04 ± 0.07 cm) and MSR (93% and 1.05 ± 0.07 cm) goats, with the LSR goats showing the lowest values (78% and 0.08 ± 0.09 cm). In turn, an increased (p < 0.05) LS occurred in the D350 group (2.06 ± 0.2 vs. 1.36 ± 0.2 cm; no differences (p > 0.05; 38.5%) in KIDD occurred among social ranks nor between eCG doses.

3.2. Effect of Social Rank × eCG Dose Interaction upon the Response Variables

A rank x dose interaction (p < 0.05) affected the response variables LW, EI %, LAT, DUR, OR, and PREG. Therefore, information on such response variables in the HSR, MSR, and LSR as affected by the eCG doses is shown in Table 3. While LW was affected (p < 0.05) by the R × D interaction, the best LW values occurred in HSR and MSR and LSR had the lowest LW, the last irrespective of the eCG dose. In addition, the largest (p < 0.05) EI % was observed in the HSR goats, irrespective of eCG (i.e., 100 or 350 IU).
In general, the greater the eCG dose, the shorter the time it took for estrus to occur; D350 generated the shortest time (p < 0.05) for estrus appearance, irrespective of social rank. Regarding the estrus duration (DUR, h), the shortest estrus was shown by the LSR + D100 combination, with no differences among HSR and MSR either with D100 or D350. With respect to ovulation rate, the largest values (p < 0.05) were shown by the HSR and MSR within D350, with intermediate values in the HSR, MSR within D100, and LSR + D350; the lowest (p < 0.05) OR was shown by the LSR + D100 goats. Regarding the pregnancy rate, the best values (p < 0.05) were observed in the HSR + D350, the MSR + D100, and the LSR + D350. Finally, while in the HSR goats the estrus peak occurred 84 h after eCG administration, in the MSR and LSR groups, it occurred at 60 h. With respect to the eCG dose, while the estrus peak in the D350 group occurred 60 h after eCG administration, in the D100 group, it occurred within an interval of 72 to 96 h (Figure 2A,B).

4. Discussion

The obtained results support our working hypothesis, in that most of the response variables were positively affected by social rank, favoring to the HSR goats (i.e., EI %, DUR h, OVU %, OR n, and CLS cm). In addition, an increased OR and PREG occurred in the HSR + D350 group, and D350 increased LS, irrespective of social rank. Dominance hierarchies encompass animal societies; social rank is affected by either internal (i.e., body size, body weight, body condition) or external (i.e., parental dominance, previous experiences) factors [29]. Certainly, in many ruminant species, reproductive success and access to food are not shared equally among the members of a herd. While social dominance ensures access to the best available food, it also exerts a positive and significant effect upon live weight. In turn, such an increased live weight enhances the metabolic status while boosting reproductive fitness [30]. Moreover, even when free access to food is available, dominant cues would promote the selection of the most nutritive ration because of a preferential access to food, favoring live weight [31]. Energy balance is a key internal cue for an animal to use in order to decide whether or not to trigger the onset or resumption of reproductive function [32]. In turn, the energy balance will affect both live weight and body condition, as well as influencing reproductive and productive performance either at pre-breeding [33] or pre-partum stages [34], both in males or females [35]. Other studies have found that, besides to live weight, the presence of horns and chronological age also influence social rank [2,4,36].
As commented, increases in both live weight and body condition are known factors inducing reproductive function in anestrus females or enhancing sexual and reproductive outcomes in cycling females [37,38]. So, based in the positive relationship among HSR, increased LW, and augmented BC, these three components will be closely aligned to an increased LH pulse frequency pattern. Such a behavioral neuro-endocrine scenario is prone to encouraging an augmented ovarian function. Our findings agree with previous studies where high hierarchy females had a faster and higher response than low hierarchy females regarding LH pulse frequency and estrus activity [7]. Some biological triggers of such increased ovarian function include reproductive hormones such as follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) or LH [32,39,40], metabolic endocrine cues such as leptin [41], insulin-like growth factor-1 [42], insulin–triiodothyronine [43], the somatotropic GH-IGF-1 axis [44], some defined neuroendocrine hints such as the kiss-1, kisspeptin, gpr-54 complex, kisspeptinergic neurons, and GnRH release [32,45], some other genomic signals such as the OCT2, TTF1, and EAP1 hypothalamic genes [32,46], and even specific nutritional molecules such as glutamate [47,48] and β-carotene [40,49].
Another interesting physio-neuro-endocrine scenario is that the HSR goats, who showed the heaviest LW, may have exerted an increased ovarian function using a non-GnRH-dependent pathway, while involving the potential action not only of diverse intra-ovarian but intra-follicular systems (i.e., the insulin–glucose, IGF-1, and leptin metabolic systems) [50]. Besides, both depressed metabolic status and reduced LW, as that observed in the LSR goats, have been shown to decrease the number of primordial, primary, and Graffian follicle populations, leading to a reduced aromatase mRNA expression and diminished FSH and LH receptors, as well as reductions in leptin levels and Ob-R transcripts [51]. Based on such findings, is tempting to suggest that the HSR and high LW goats may have exerted an enhanced steroidogenesis in those follicles with the lowest threshold to the action of FSH. Such a scenario would increase follicle recruitment, augmenting the aromatization from androgens to estrogens, enlarging the formation and size of the antrum, while increasing oocyte quality, ovulation rate, and fertilization rate. All of them are followed by enhancements in luteogenesis, progesterone synthesis, embryonic implantation, and gestation [32]. Interestingly, an HSR has been related to high androgen levels in males [52], while females treated with estradiol or testosterone displayed less submissive behavior compared to those receiving progesterone or placebo [53].
With respect to the eCG dose (i.e., 100 or 350 IU) the goat response was similar LW (41.1 kg), BC (1.9 units), EI (75.5%), DUR (21.9 h), OVU (90%), CLS (0.98 cm), PREG (53%), and KIDD (38.5%). Our results agree with other studies, where hormonal protocols involving intramuscular progesterone + eCG or hCG were used in anestrus goats [19,22]. Indeed, the eCG + P4 treatment induced reproductive activity in non-cycling goats. The latter was certainly due to the particular function of this gonadotropin, which has a primary activity of FSH and secondarily of LH [18,54]. Therefore, it can be assumed that both doses were sufficient to stimulate the preovulatory LH surge in both eCG groups, promoting not only ovulation but an optimum estradiol level required for estrus induction, ovulation, and pregnancy. However, a reduced LAT with increases in both OR and LS were observed in the D350 group. This was probably due to the fact that a higher number of FSH and LH receptors were expressed in the D359 group, promoting an increased steroidogenesis, an augmented aromatization in theca cells, a larger antrum formation, and a faster peak in estradiol levels, as well as an earlier LH surge, all of which merged to an increased follicular recruitment augmenting both OR and LS in the D350 goats [18].

5. Conclusions

This study reveals the key effect of social rank—clearly linked to live weight—upon reproductive outcomes in anestrus goats subjected to an estrus induction protocol primed with progesterone and receiving a differential eCG dose, either 100 or 350 IU, in crossbred dairy goats. Most of the response variables were affected by social rank, favoring to the high social rank goats (i.e., EI %, DUR h, OVU %, OR n, and CLS cm). In addition, a reduced LAT, with increases in OR and LS, occurred in the HSR + D350 group, while D350 increased LS irrespective of social rank. The lowest ranked goats were lighter compared to the MSR and HSR goats, indicating a strong food competition. Interestingly, since no differences regarding EI, DUR, OVU, CLS, PREG, or KIDD occurred between eCG doses (i.e., 100 or 350 IU), the obtained values support the use of a reduced level of exogenous hormones for the induction of estrus during the natural anestrus season. Any attempt to reduce the use of exogenous hormones for the reproductive control of domestic animals will always be welcomed by a highly informed society committed to animal welfare and food safety. These findings are relevant not only from a behavioral, physiological, and wellbeing standpoint, but also acquire productive significance in order to speed up the out-of-season reproductive efficiency of the dairy goat industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z.-G., F.G.V.-D., C.A.M.-H., J.O.-S.; data curation, S.Z.-G., F.G.V.-D., C.A.M.-H., A.M.-C., J.O.-S., C.P.-M., N.M.L.-F.; formal analyses, C.A.M.-H., S.Z.-G., F.G.V.-D.; funding acquisition, F.G.V.-D., E.C.; investigation, S.Z.-G., A.M.-C., E.C., G.C.-L., U.N.G.-G.; project administration, S.Z.-G., F.G.V.-D., E.C., G.C.-L.; resources, F.G.V.-D., E.C., U.N.G.-G.; supervision, C.A.M.-H., F.G.V.-D., S.Z.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was founded by the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT, Mexico) through the Research Sectorial Fund SAGARPA-CONACYT: 2017-4-291691, which greatly contributed to the generation of most of the information presented in this study.

Acknowledgments

To the Research Sectorial Fund SAGARPA-CONACYT, and to the graduate students from the Agro Livestock Production Graduate Program, UAAAN-UL, Mexico. N.M.L.-F. is a double-degree doctoral student at Chapingo Autonomous UniversityURUZA (UACH-URUZA, Mexico) and at the University of Cordoba (UCO, Spain), supported by a CONACYT Scholarship Grant, CVU-633614.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported in this manuscript.

References

  1. Alvarez, L.; Martin, G.B.; Galindo, F.; Zarco, L.A. Social dominance of female goats affects their response to the male effect. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 84, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Côté, S.D. Dominance hierarchies in female mountain goats: Stability, aggressiveness and determinants of rank. Behaviour 2000, 137, 1541–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fournier, F.; Festa-Bianchet, M. Social dominance in adult female mountain goats. Anim. Behav. 1995, 49, 1449–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pelletier, F.; Festa-Bianchet, M. Sexual selection and social rank in bighorn rams. Anim. Behav. 2006, 71, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ungerfeld, R.; Correa, O. Social dominance of female dairy goats influences the dynamics of gastrointestinal parasite eggs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 105, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aguirre, V.; Orihuela, A.; Vázquez, R. Seasonal variations in sexual behavior, testosterone, testicular size and semen characteristics, as affected by social dominance, of tropical hair rams (Ovis aries). Anim. Sci. J. 2007, 78, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alvarez, L.; Zarco, L.; Galindo, F.; Blache, D.; Martin, G.B. Social rank and response to the “male effect” in the Australian Cashmere goat. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2007, 102, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Côte, S.D.; Festa-Bianchet, M. Reproductive success in female mountain goats: The influence of age and social rank. Anim. Behav. 2001, 62, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Santiago-Moreno, J.; Gómez-Brunet, A.; Toledano-Díaz, A.; Pulido-Pastor, A.; López-Sebastián, A. Social dominance and breeding activity in Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica) maintained in captivity. Reprod. Fert. Dev. 2006, 19, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alvarez, L.; Ramos, A.L.; Zarco, L. The ovulatory and LH responses to the male effect in dominant and subordinate goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2009, 83, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alvarez, L.; Arvizu, R.R.; Luna, J.A.; Zarco, L.A. Social ranking and plasma progesterone levels in goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 90, 161–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ungerfeld, R.; González-Pensado, S.P.; Dago, A.L.; Vilariño, M.; Menchaca, A. Social dominance of female dairy goats and response to oestrus synchronisation and superovulatory treatments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 105, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chemineau, P.; Malpaux, B.; Brillard, J.P.; Fostier, A. Seasonality of reproduction and production in farm fishes, birds and mammals. Animal 2007, 1, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fatet, A.; Pellicer-Rubio, M.T.; Leboeuf, B. Reproductive cycle of goats. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 124, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Delgadillo, J.A. Environmental and social cues can be used in combination to develop sustainable breeding techniques for goat reproduction in the subtropics. Animal 2011, 5, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pérez-Razo, M.A.; Sánchez, F.; Torres-Hernández, G.; Becerril-Pérez, C.; Gallegos-Sánchez, J.; González-Cosío, F.; Meza-Herrera, C.A. Risk factors associated with dairy goats stayability. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 89, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  17. Navarrete-Molina, C.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Herrera-Machuca, M.A.; Macias-Cruz, U.; Véliz-Deras, F.G. Not all ruminants were created equal: Environmental and socio-economic sustainability of goats under a marginal-extensive production system. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Simões, J. Recent advances on synchronization of ovulation in goats, out of season, for a more sustainable production. Asian Pac. J. Reprod. 2015, 4, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Contreras-Villarreal, V.; Meza-Herrara, C.A.; Rivas-Muños, R.; Angel-García, O.; Luna-Orozco, J.R.; Carrillo, E.; Mellado, M.; Veliz-Deras, F.G. Reproductive performance of seasonally anovular mixed-bred dairy goats induced to ovulate with a combination of progesterone and eCG or estradiol. Anim. Sci. J. 2016, 87, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martemucci, G.; D’Alessandro, A.G. Induction/synchronization of oestrus and ovulation in dairy goats with different short term treatments and fixed time intrauterine or exocervical insemination system. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 126, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abecia, J.A.; Forcada, F.; González-Bulnes, A. Hormonal control of reproduction in small ruminants. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2012, 130, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alvarado-Espino, A.S.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Carrillo, E.; González-Álvarez, V.H.; Guillen-Muñoz, J.M.; Ángel-García, O.; Mellado, M.; Véliz-Deras, F.G. Reproductive outcomes of Alpine goats primed with progesterone and treated with human chorionic gonadotropin during the anestrus-to-estrus transition season. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 167, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rodríguez-Martinez, R.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Tapia-Robles, K.I.; Alvarado-Espino, A.S.; Luna-Orozco, J.R.; Leyva, C.; Mellado, M.; Veliz-Deras, F.G. Effect of two routes of administration of human chorionic gonadotropin upon estrus induction and reproductive outcomes in adult acyclic mixbreed goats. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2018, 46, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. FASS. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, 3rd ed.; Federation Animal Science Society: Champaing, IL, USA, 2010; p. 177. [Google Scholar]
  25. NAM-National Academy of Medicine. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Co-Produced by the National Academy of Medicine–Mexico and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International, 1st ed.; Harlan: Mexico City, Mexico, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. Walkden-Brown, S.W.; Restall, B.J.; Scaramuzzy, R.J.; Martin, G.B.; Blackberry, M.A. Seasonality in male Australian cashmere goats: Long term effects of castration and testosterone or oestradiol treatment on changes in LH, FSH and prolactin concentrations, and body growth. Small Rumin. Res. 1997, 26, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luna-Orozco, J.R.; Guillen-Muñoz, J.M.; De Santiago-Miramontes, M.d.l.A.; García, J.E.; Rodríguez-Martínez, R.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Mellado, M.; Véliz, F.G. Influence of sexually inactive bucks subjected to long photoperiod or testosterone on the induction of estrus in anovulatory goats. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012, 44, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Festing, F.W.; Nevalainen, T. The design and statistical analysis of animal experiments: Introduction to this issue. ILAR J. 2014, 55, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Higham, J.P.; Heistermann, M.; Saggau, C.; Agil, M.; Perwitasari-Farajallah, D.; Engelhardt, A. Sexual signaling in female crested macaques and the evolution of primate fertility signals. BMC Evol. Biol. 2012, 12, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ceacero, F.; García, A.J.; Landete-Castillejos, T.; Bartošová, J.; Bartoš, L.; Gallego, L. Benefits for dominant red deer hinds under a competitive feeding system: Food access behavior, diet and nutrient selection. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Esposito, L.; de Nicola, D.; Balestrieri, A.; Petrovas, G.; Licitra, F.; Salzano, A.; Neglia, G. Effect of live body weight and method of synchronization on ovulation, pregnancy rate and embryo and fetal loss in buffalo heifers. Anim. Reprod. 2019, 16, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Tena-Sempere, M. Interface between Nutrition and Reproduction. In Animal Reproduction in Livestock—Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems; Astiz, S., Gonzalez, A., Eds.; Eolss Publishers: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  33. Urrutia-Morales, J.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Tello-Varela, L.; Diaz-Gomez, M.O.; Beltran-Lopez, S. Effect of nutritional supplementation upon pregnancy rates of goats reared under semiarid rangelands and exposed to the male effect. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012, 44, 1473–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Vicente-Pérez, A.; Osorio-Marin, Y.; Giron-Gomez, B.S.; Beltran-Calderon, E.; Avendaño-Reyes, L.; Correa-Calderon, A.; Macias-Cruz, U. Heat stress, divergent nutrition level and late pregancy in hair sheep: Effects upon cotyledon development and litter weight at birth. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2015, 47, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Flores-Najera, M.J.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Echavarria, F.G.; Villagomez, E.; Iñiguez, L.; Salinas, H.; Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. Influence of nutritional and socio-sexual cues upon reproductive efficiency of goats exposed to the male effect under extensive conditions. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2010, 50, 897–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barroso, F.G.; Alados, C.L.; Boza, J. Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: Effect on food habits and production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 69, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Scaramuzzi, R.J.; Martin, G.B. The importance of interactions among nutrition, seasonality and socio-sexual factors in the development of hormone-free methods for controlling fertility. Repr. Dom. Anim. 2008, 43, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rivas-Muñoz, R.; Carrillo, E.; Rodriguez-Martinez, R.; Leyva, C.; Mellado, M.; Véliz, F.G. Effect of body condition score of does and use of bucks. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2010, 42, 1285–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Ross, T.; Hallford, D.; Hawkins, D.; Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. Effects of body condition and protein supplementation on LH secretion and luteal function in sheep. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2007, 42, 461–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lopez-Flores, N.M.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Perez-Marin, C.; Blache, D.; Arellano-Rodríguez, G.; Zuñiga-Garcia, S.; Navarrete-Molina, C.; Garcia De la Peña, C.; Rosales-Nieto, C.A.; Veliz-Deras, F.G. Precision betacarotene supplementation enhanced ovarian function and the LH release pattern in yearling crossbred anestrus goats. Animals 2020, 10, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gamez-Vazquez, H.G.; Rosales-Nieto, C.A.; Bañuelos-Valenzuela, R.; Urrutia-Morales, J.; Diaz-Gomez, M.O.; Silva-Ramos, J.M.; Meza-Herrera, C.A. Body condition score positively influence plasma leptin concentrations in criollo goats. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2008, 7, 1237–1240. [Google Scholar]
  42. Guerra-Garcia, M.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Sanchez-Torres-Esqueda, M.T.; Gallegos-Sanchez, J.; Torres-Hernandez, G.; Pro-Martinez, A. IGF-1 and ovarian activity of goats in divergent body condition and supplemented with non-degradable ruminal protein. Agrociencia 2009, 43, 241–247. [Google Scholar]
  43. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Torres-Moreno, M.; Lopez-Medrano, J.I.; Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.; Veliz, F.G.; Mellado, M.; Wurzinger, M.; Soto-Sanchez, M.J.; Calderon-Leyva, M.G. Glutamate supply positively affects serum release of triiodothyronine and insulin across time without increases of glucose during the onset of puberty in the female goat. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 125, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lopez-Flores, N.M.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Galán-Soldevilla, C.; Bautista-Rodriguez, D.A.; Veliz-Deras, F.G.; Arellano-Rodriguez, G.; Garcia-De la Peña, C.; Rosales-Nieto, C.A.; Macias-Cruz, U. The key role of targeted betacarotene supplementation upon endocrine and reproductive outcomes in goats: Follicular development, ovulation rate & the GH-IGF-1 axis. Small Rumin. Res. 2018, 163, 29–33. [Google Scholar]
  45. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Veliz-Deras, F.G.; Wurzinger, M.; Lopez-Ariza, B.; Arellano-Rodriguez, G.; Rodriguez-Martinez, R. The kiss-1, kisspeptin, gpr-54 complex: A critical modulator of GnRH neurons during pubertal activation. J. Appl. Biomed. 2010, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.; Kridli, R.; Mellado, M.; Arechiga-Flores, C.F.; Salinas, H.; Luginbhul, J.M. Neuroendocrine, metabolic and genomic cues signaling the onset of puberty in females. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2010, 45, e495–e502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Gonzalez-Velazquez, A.; Veliz-Deras, F.G.; Rodriguez-Martinez, R.; Arellano-Rodriguez, G.; Serradilla, J.M.; Garcia-Martinez, A.; Avendaño-Reyes, L.; Macias-Cruz, U. Short-term glutamate administration positively affects the number of antral follicles and the ovulation rate in cycling adult goats. Reprod. Biol. 2014, 13, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Vergara-Hernandez, H.P.; Paleta-Ochoa, A.; Alvarez-Ruiz, A.R.; Veliz-Deras, F.G.; Arellano-Rodriguez, G.; Rosales-Nieto, C.A.; Macias-Cruz, U.; Rodriguez-Martinez, R.; Carrillo, E. Glutamate supply reactivates ovarian function while increases serum insulin and triiodothyronine concentrations in Criollo x Saanen-Alpine yearlings’ goats during the anestrus season. Animals 2020, 10, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Pacheco-Alvarez, P.; Castro, O.E.; Macias-Cruz, U.; Avendaño-Reyes, L.; Mellado, M.; Veliz-Deras, F.G.; Contreras-Villarreal, V.; Abad-Zavaleta, J.; Rodriguez-Martinez, R.; et al. Betacarotene supplementation positively affects selected blood metabolites across time around the onset of puberty in goats. Czech. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 62, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Scaramuzzi, R.J.; Campbell, B.K.; Downing, J.A.; Kendall, N.R.; Khalid, M.; Muñoz-Gutiérrez, M.; Somchit, A. A review of the effects of supplementary nutrition in the ewe on the concentrations of reproductive and metabolic hormones and the mechanisms that regulate folliculogenesis and ovulation rate. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2006, 46, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Da Silva Faria, T.; de Bittencourt Brasil, F.; Sampaio, F.J.; da Fonte Ramos, C. Maternal malnutrition during lactation affects folliculogenesis, gonadotropins, and leptin receptors in adult rats. Nutrition 2010, 26, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Girard-Buttoz, C.; Heistermann, M.; Rahmi, E.; Agil, M.; Ahmad Fauzan, P.; Engelhardt, A. Androgen correlates of male reproductive effort in wild male long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis): A multi-level test of the challenge hypothesis. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 141, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Fritzsche, P.; Riek, M.; Gattermann, R. Effects of social stress on behavior and corpus luteum in female golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Physiol. Behav. 2000, 68, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Murphy, B.D. Equine chorionic gonadotropin: An enigmatic but essential tool. Anim. Reprod. 2012, 9, 223–230. [Google Scholar]
Animals 10 01125 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental protocol. In February, a behavioral study was carried out to define the social ranks: high (HSR), middle (MSR), or low (LSR) social rank. Then, all goats were exposed to an estrus induction protocol, in order to induce reproductive activity during the natural anestrus season in Northern Mexico (March; 25°51’ North). All goats were primed with progesterone (P4) and received different doses of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) (100 or 350 IU). Estrus activity was evaluated daily after the application of eCG doses up to day 7. Transrectal ultrasound (US) scanning was performed on days −8 and −2 to confirm anovulation (AN) as well as on days 10 and 45 post eCG treatment, to assess both ovulatory rate (OR) and pregnancy rate (PG), respectively.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental protocol. In February, a behavioral study was carried out to define the social ranks: high (HSR), middle (MSR), or low (LSR) social rank. Then, all goats were exposed to an estrus induction protocol, in order to induce reproductive activity during the natural anestrus season in Northern Mexico (March; 25°51’ North). All goats were primed with progesterone (P4) and received different doses of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) (100 or 350 IU). Estrus activity was evaluated daily after the application of eCG doses up to day 7. Transrectal ultrasound (US) scanning was performed on days −8 and −2 to confirm anovulation (AN) as well as on days 10 and 45 post eCG treatment, to assess both ovulatory rate (OR) and pregnancy rate (PG), respectively.
Animals 10 01125 g001
Animals 10 01125 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage of estrus induction with respect to the application of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG), until the appearance of estrus behavior in goats according to (A) social rank (high, medium, and low) and (B) eCG dose (100 or 350 IU) in multiracial (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) dairy goats managed under intensive stall-fed conditions in Northern Mexico (March, 25°51’ North). All goats were primed with progesterone and received different doses of eCG (100 or 350 IU) according to the defined social rank: low, middle, or high.
Figure 2. Percentage of estrus induction with respect to the application of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG), until the appearance of estrus behavior in goats according to (A) social rank (high, medium, and low) and (B) eCG dose (100 or 350 IU) in multiracial (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) dairy goats managed under intensive stall-fed conditions in Northern Mexico (March, 25°51’ North). All goats were primed with progesterone and received different doses of eCG (100 or 350 IU) according to the defined social rank: low, middle, or high.
Animals 10 01125 g002
Table
Table 1. Least square means ± standard error for winning events [threats, bumps, shoves, and chases] or lost events [evasions and escapes] in the behavioral study carried out to define the social hierarchy based on a success index according to the average agonistic interactions defining the low (LSR), medium (MSR), or high (HSR) social rank in multiracial (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) dairy goats managed under intensive stall-fed conditions in Northern Mexico (February, 25°51’ North).
Table 1. Least square means ± standard error for winning events [threats, bumps, shoves, and chases] or lost events [evasions and escapes] in the behavioral study carried out to define the social hierarchy based on a success index according to the average agonistic interactions defining the low (LSR), medium (MSR), or high (HSR) social rank in multiracial (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) dairy goats managed under intensive stall-fed conditions in Northern Mexico (February, 25°51’ North).
Behaviors Social Rank
LSRMSRHSR
Threats25 ± 5.6106 ± 8.7231 ± 19.5
Bumps6 ± 1.427 ± 3.646 ± 7.7
Shoves2 ± 0.55 ± 1.013 ± 3.2
Chases0 ± 00 ± 01 ± 0.5
Evasions345 ± 48.1125 ± 11.167 ± 8.9
Escapes1 ± 0.40 ± 00 ± 0
Success Index 10–0.330.34–0.630.63–1.0
1 Number of individuals able to displace/(number of individuals able to displace + number of individuals displaced).
Table
Table 2. Least square means ± standard error for live weight (LW, kg), body condition (BC, units), estrus induction (EI, %), latency to estrus (LAT, h), duration of estrus (DUR, h), ovulation (OVU, %), ovulation rate (OR, n), corpus luteum size (CLS, cm), pregnancy (PREG, %), kidding (KIDD, %), and litter size (LS, n) according to social rank (i.e., LSR, MSR, and HSR) and eCG dose (i.e., 100 or 350 mg) in multiracial (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) dairy goats managed under intensive stall-fed conditions in Northern Mexico (March, 25°51’ North) 1.
Table 2. Least square means ± standard error for live weight (LW, kg), body condition (BC, units), estrus induction (EI, %), latency to estrus (LAT, h), duration of estrus (DUR, h), ovulation (OVU, %), ovulation rate (OR, n), corpus luteum size (CLS, cm), pregnancy (PREG, %), kidding (KIDD, %), and litter size (LS, n) according to social rank (i.e., LSR, MSR, and HSR) and eCG dose (i.e., 100 or 350 mg) in multiracial (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) dairy goats managed under intensive stall-fed conditions in Northern Mexico (March, 25°51’ North) 1.
VariablesSocial Rank (R)eCG Dose (D)p Value
LSRMSRHSR100350RDR × D
LW (kg)31.6 ± 1.6 b44.0 ± 1.3 a49.0 ± 1.4 a41.9 ± 1.5 a41.8 ± 1.4 a0.0010.6150.001
BC (units)1.8 ± 0.07 a1.9 ± 0.06 a1.9 ± 0.06 a1.9 ± 0.05 a1.9 ± 0.05 a0.7680.7330.978
EI (%)10/18 (56) b20/28 (71) b23/24 (96) a26/35 (74) a27/35 (77) a0.0070.5990.019
LAT (h)57.6 ± 4.6 a69.6 ± 3.2 a68.3 ± 3.0 a76.1 ± 3.0 b57.7 ± 2.8 a0.3730.0010.001
DUR (h)17.3 ± 4.0 b18.9 ± 3.2 b29.0 ± 3.5 a20.2 ± 2.9 a23.6 ± 2.9 a0.0040.3130.051
OVU (%)14/18 b (78)26/28 ab (93)23/24 a (96)30/35 a (86)33/35 a (94)0.050.1770.294
OR (n)1.27 ± 0.17 a1.77 ± 0.13 a1.58 ± 0.14 a1.09 ± 0.10 b2.06 ± 0.10 a0.0790.0010.001
CLS (cm)0.8 ± 0.09 b1.05 ± 0.07 a1.04 ± 0.07 a 0.91 ± 0.06 a1.05 ± 0.06 a0.0460.080.13
PREG (%)9/18 a (50)14/28 a (50)14/24 a (58)16/35 a (46)21/35 a (60)0.6510.1470.037
KIDD (%)5/18 a (28)10/28 a (36)12/24 a (50)11/35 a (31)16/35 a (46)0.2790.1840.119
LS (n)1.60 ± 0.4 a1.80 ± 0.3 a1.83± 0.2 a1.36 ± 0.2 b2.06 ± 0.2 a0.2280.0230.139
1 In February, a behavioral study was carried out to define the social ranks; low (LSR), middle (MSR), or high (HSR) social rank. Then, all goats were exposed to an estrus induction protocol to induce reproductive activity (March). All goats were primed with progesterone (P4) and received different doses of eCG (100 or 350 IU). a,b Least square means without a common superscript within a response variable are different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Least square means ± s.e. for live weight (LW, kg), estrus induction (EI, %), latency to estrus (LAT, h), duration of estrus (DUR, h), ovulation (OVU, %), ovulation rate (OR, n), corpus luteum size (CLS, cm), pregnancy (PREG, %), kidding (KIDD, %), and litter size (LS, n) as affected by the social rank (i.e., HSR, MSR, and LSR) × eCG dose (i.e., 100 or 350 mg) interaction in multiracial (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) dairy goats managed under intensive stall-fed conditions in Northern Mexico (March, 25°51’ North) 1.
Table 3. Least square means ± s.e. for live weight (LW, kg), estrus induction (EI, %), latency to estrus (LAT, h), duration of estrus (DUR, h), ovulation (OVU, %), ovulation rate (OR, n), corpus luteum size (CLS, cm), pregnancy (PREG, %), kidding (KIDD, %), and litter size (LS, n) as affected by the social rank (i.e., HSR, MSR, and LSR) × eCG dose (i.e., 100 or 350 mg) interaction in multiracial (Alpine–Saanen–Nubian × Criollo; n = 70) dairy goats managed under intensive stall-fed conditions in Northern Mexico (March, 25°51’ North) 1.
VariableseCG-100eCG-350
LSRMSRHSRLSRMSRHSR
LW (kg)30.0 ± 2.4 b43.4 ± 1.8 a47.6 ± 1.9 a33.0 ± 2.1 b44.7 ± 1.8 a47.4 ± 2.1 a
EI (%)3/8 c (38)11/14 ab (79)12/13 ab (92)7/10 ab (70)9/14 bc (64)11/11 a (100)
LAT (h)72.0 ± 8.4 abc79.6 ± 4.4 a74.0 ± 4.2 ab51.4 ± 5.5 d57.3 ± 4.8 cd62.2 ± 4.4 bcd
DUR (h)7.5 ± 5.9 b18.9 ± 4.5 ab29.5 ± 4.6 a25.2 ± 5.3 a18.9 ± 4.5 ab28.4 ± 5.0 a
OR (n)0.86 ± 0.3 d1.2 ± 0.2 cd1.2 ± 0.2 cd1.6 ± 0.2 bc2.3 ± 0.2 a2.1 ± 0.2 ab
PREG (%)3/8 b (38)9/14 ab (64)4/13 b (31)6/10 ab (60)5/14 b (36)10/11 a (91)
1 In February, a behavioral study was carried out to define the social ranks; low (LSR), middle (MSR), or high (HSR) social rank. Then, all goats were exposed to an estrus induction protocol to induce reproductive activity (March). All goats were primed with progesterone (P4) and received different doses of eCG (100 or 350 IU). a–d Least square means without a common superscript within a response variable are different (p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zuñiga-Garcia, S.; Meza-Herrera, C.A.; Mendoza-Cortina, A.; Otal-Salaverri, J.; Perez-Marin, C.; Lopez-Flores, N.M.; Carrillo, E.; Calderon-Leyva, G.; Gutierrez-Guzman, U.N.; Veliz-Deras, F.G. Effect of Social Rank upon Estrus Induction and Some Reproductive Outcomes in Anestrus Goats Treated With Progesterone + eCG. Animals 2020, 10, 1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071125

AMA Style

Zuñiga-Garcia S, Meza-Herrera CA, Mendoza-Cortina A, Otal-Salaverri J, Perez-Marin C, Lopez-Flores NM, Carrillo E, Calderon-Leyva G, Gutierrez-Guzman UN, Veliz-Deras FG. Effect of Social Rank upon Estrus Induction and Some Reproductive Outcomes in Anestrus Goats Treated With Progesterone + eCG. Animals. 2020; 10(7):1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071125

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zuñiga-Garcia, Santiago, Cesar A. Meza-Herrera, Adela Mendoza-Cortina, Julio Otal-Salaverri, Carlos Perez-Marin, Noé M. Lopez-Flores, Evaristo Carrillo, Guadalupe Calderon-Leyva, Ulises N. Gutierrez-Guzman, and Francisco G. Veliz-Deras. 2020. "Effect of Social Rank upon Estrus Induction and Some Reproductive Outcomes in Anestrus Goats Treated With Progesterone + eCG" Animals 10, no. 7: 1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071125

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop