Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Effects Following Fresh/Vitrified Embryo Transfer Are Transmitted by Paternal Germline in a Large Size Rabbit Cohort
Next Article in Special Issue
Cardiac Transcriptomics Reveals That MAPK Pathway Plays an Important Role in Hypoxia Tolerance in Bighead Carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis)
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Factors Influencing Body Weight Variation in Hanwoo Steers Using an Automated Weighing System
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/ani10081271
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of the Pituitary Gland between Cattle Breeds Differing in Growth: Yunling Cattle and Leiqiong Cattle

by
Xubin Lu
1,
Abdelaziz Adam Idriss Arbab
1,
Zhipeng Zhang
1,
Yongliang Fan
1,
Ziyin Han
1,
Qisong Gao
1,
Yujia Sun
2 and
Zhangping Yang
1,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(8), 1271; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081271
Submission received: 6 July 2020 / Revised: 20 July 2020 / Accepted: 23 July 2020 / Published: 25 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animals' Transcriptome Response to Environment Change)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Growth and development are very important in agricultural animals because they remarkably affect the value of the livestock. Although both Yunling cattle and Leiqiong cattle belong to the same subspecies, Bos taurus indicus (also known as the zebu cattle), they show extreme difference in growth rate from birth to adulthood. The pituitary gland is a key endocrine organ that regulates the secretion of growth-related hormones. To identify the core genes controlling growth by regulating the expression of hormones, in this study, the contents of six growth-related hormones were detected in the plasma of the two breeds, and transcriptome sequencing was performed to screen the differentially expressed genes related to the secretion of these hormones. Our study revealed that the overall gene expression levels are quite similar between the two breeds; eight new candidate genes were detected that may regulate the growth of cattle by regulating the secretion of growth-related hormones. Our findings will help researchers further understand the mechanism of the pituitary gland’s influence on growth and development in cattle. The results can contribute to the artificial selection and development of the beef cattle industry.

Abstract

The hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid (HPT) axis hormones regulate the growth and development of ruminants, and the pituitary gland plays a decisive role in this process. In order to identify pivotal genes in the pituitary gland that could affect the growth of cattle by regulating the secretion of hormones, we detected the content of six HPT hormones related to growth in the plasma of two cattle breeds (Yunling and Leiqiong cattle, both also known as the zebu cattle) with great differences in growth and compared the transcriptome data of their pituitary glands. Our study found that the contents of GH, IGF, TSH, thyroxine, triiodothyronine, and insulin were significantly different between the two breeds, which was the main cause of the difference in growth; 175 genes were identified as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Functional association analyses revealed that DEGs were mainly involved in the process of transcription and signal transduction. Combining the enrichment analysis and protein interaction analysis, eight DEGs were predicted to control the growth of cattle by affecting the expression of growth-related hormones in the pituitary gland. In summary, our results suggested that SLC38A1, SLC38A3, DGKH, GNB4, GNAQ, ESR1, NPY, and GAL are candidates in the pituitary gland for regulating the growth of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle by regulating the secretion of growth-related hormones. This study may help researchers further understand the growth mechanisms and improve the artificial selection of zebu cattle.

1. Introduction

Growth and development are extremely important in beef cattle production because they significantly impact farmers’ income, as well as adjust and improve the dietary structure and people’s living standards. A large amount of cattle research has focused on the molecular regulation mechanisms related to growth and development [1,2].
The pituitary is the most critical and complex endocrine gland. Located on the underside of the brain and connected to the hypothalamus, it has been demonstrated to regulate growth and development by secreting a variety of hormones such as growth hormone (GH) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) [3,4,5]. Changes in the level of GH secreted by the pituitary gland can directly affect insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1) secretion and regulate postnatal growth in cattle [4]. Aside from causing IGF-1 release, GH antagonizes insulin action, which could affect the development of lean tissue by nutritional distribution [6]. TSH is mainly responsible for regulating the proliferation of thyroid cells and the synthesis and secretion of thyroid hormones (TH) and affects the growth and metabolism of cattle. The production of cattle therefore involves GH, TSH, IGF-1, and insulin because they act together on individual animals [7]. Many genes that participate in the process have been identified, such as MYC, PPARG, GSK3B, TG, STAT5b, and IYD [8,9]. However, the growth and development of biological organisms is very complicated, and there are still many genes involved that need to be identified [10,11].
As a new fast and efficient transcriptome research method, high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) can help researchers to reveal the genetic mechanisms of animals and improve the production of animal products [12]. Yunling and Leiqiong are beef cattle breeds in the south of China. Yunling cattle have been cross-bred for almost 40 years using three breeds of Brahman (1/2), Murray Grey (1/4), and Chinese native cattle (1/4). Adult Yunling cattle generally weigh more than 500 kg. With the characters of enhanced growth, high meat production rate, and good reproductive capacity under high temperature and high humidity conditions, Yunling cattle have become an important source of beef production in China [13]. Leiqiong cattle are a Chinese native breed with more than 2000 years of breeding history in China’s southernmost regions such as Guangdong province and Hainan province. Research has shown that Leiqiong cattle may originate from Bos indicus [14]. Leiqiong cattle have strong limbs, firm hooves, and thin and elastic skin, and along with the characteristics of heat resistance and strong tick resistance, Leiqiong cattle are often used for labor in rural areas of China. However, the growth and meat production rate are usually low, and adult Leiqiong cattle generally weigh around 200 kg [15]. Yunling and Leiqiong cattle breeds all belong to the same subspecies, Bos taurus indicus (also known as the zebu cattle), but show great differences in growth rate from birth to adulthood. Our research will reveal the effect of the pituitary gland on the growth of zebu cattle at the molecular level.
To further understand the molecular interaction in the pituitary glands of cattle and identify pivotal genes that control growth by affecting the secretion of growth-related hormones, we detected the content of six hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis (HPT) hormones, GH, IGF-1, TSH, triiodothyronine, thyroxine, and insulin, in the plasma of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle breeds and performed RNA-seq technology on the pituitary glands of these two breeds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Statement

This research was conducted in strict accordance with the Regulations of the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (China, 2004) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of School of the Yangzhou University Animal Experiments Ethics Committee (License Number: SYXK (Su) IACUC 2012-0029). All animals were raised and slaughtered according to the Standards for the Administration of Experimental Practices (Jiangsu Province, China, 2008).

2.2. Animals and Sample Collection

Three Yunling bulls and three Leiqiong bulls of 12 months old were selected and raised at the Academy of Grassland and Animal Science (Yunnan Province, China) for six months. All the cattle were born on the same day, and there was no close family relationship (at least three generations back) between them. All cattle were not castrated in this study, and they were all in the stage of sexual maturity throughout the 6-month experiment. Before the experiment, they were provided enough feed and all of them showed normal growth (no disease or nutritional deficiencies). Then the cattle were kept in one cowshed and fed the same diet, which consisted of 56% corn, 6% soybean meal, 8% cottonseed meal, 1.2% vegetable oil, 13% rapeseed dregs, 12.5% wheat bran, 1.3% CaHPO4, 0.5% NaCl, 0.5% NaHCO3, and 1.0% premix. All six bulls were provided enough feed and could access feed throughout the day during the experiment. The average birth weight of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle was 28.37 ± 1.32 kg and 15.02 ± 2.14 kg, respectively. The average weight of Yunling cattle at the age of 12 months was 292.21 ± 8.65 kg, while the average weight of Leiqiong cattle was 132.72 ± 5.11 kg. At the time of slaughter (18 months), the average body weight of the two breeds was 496.8 ± 14.03 kg (Yunling) and 193.60 ± 11.21 kg (Leiqiong), and the average daily gain of the Yunling and Leiqiong cattle breeds was 1.13 ± 0.24 kg and 0.34 ± 0.08 kg during the six-month experiment, respectively. The daily gain and the weight at birth, at 12 months and at slaughter, of the two breeds were analyzed using independent samples t-test performed in SPSS (v. 26.0), and all have significant difference (p < 0.01). At the age of 18 months, about 2 h after they had last been fed, they were chemically anesthetized and humanely slaughtered without any pain at Jinggu Zhaohui Slaughterhouse (Yunnan Province, China). After the cattle were slaughtered, the entire pituitary fossa in the lower thalamus was obtained by cutting the skull. Then, the diaphragm on the surface of the pituitary fossa was carefully removed with tweezers. The pituitary glands were placed in RNase-free cryopreservation tubes and immediately placed in liquid nitrogen for subsequent analysis.
During the week before slaughter, after removing feed from the cattle for 2 h, blood samples from the two cattle breeds were collected from the jugular vein every afternoon. Samples were stored in sterile EDTA blood collection tubes (Becton, Dickinson and Company, New York, NY, USA) and immediately placed on ice packs and brought into the laboratory for refrigeration. Then the blood was centrifuged at 1015.30× g for 30 min to separate out the plasma, and the plasma was stored at −20 °C for further measurements.

2.3. Quantification of Growth-Related Hormones

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, six hormones from plasma samples, GH, IGF-1, TSH, triiodothyronine, thyroxine, and insulin, were quantified using bovine-specific ELISA kits; the catalog (CAT) number for the kits detecting GH, IGF-1, TSH, triiodothyronine, thyroxine, and insulin were EY-ELISA-3428, EY-ELISA-0326, EY-ELISA-6368, EY-ELISA-7746, EY-ELISA-7747, and EY-ELISA-5325, respectively. All six kits were procured from the Y-S Biotechnology Company (Shanghai, China). The optical density (OD) at 450 nm was measured by a Tecan Nano Quant ELISA reader (Infinite M200 PRO, Männedorf, Switzerland). The coefficient of variation (CV) of every hormone’s intra-assay was less than 10%. The average concentrations of the six hormones between the two breeds were analyzed using independent samples t-test performed in SPSS (v. 26.0).

2.4. RNA Extraction and Sequencing

The total RNA of each pituitary gland sample was extracted with Trizol reagent (15596026, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was quantified by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and qualified by measuring the 260/280 nm absorbance on a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, Westlake Village, CA, USA). Then the quality of RNA was evaluated by the RNA integrity number (RIN) in a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Only samples of high quality (RIN > 8) were used to construct the RNA-seq library.
All six samples’ cDNA libraries were obtained by a TruSeq Stranded mRNA LT Sample Prep Kit (RS-122-2101, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the polyadenylated mRNA was purified and concentrated with oligo (dT)-conjugated magnetic beads (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and fragmented with the Elute, Prime, Fragment Mix (Illumina) at 95 °C. Then end repair and 5′ adaptor ligation were conducted [16]. After that, reverse transcription was carried out with RT primers, and end repair and 3′ end adenylation were performed. Then the cDNA was purified and amplified via 10 PCR cycles, and the obtained libraries were refined by Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman, Miami, FL, USA), validated by the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and calibrated by the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Q32854, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Finally, the cDNA libraries were detected on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 using 2 × 150 bp paired-end sequencing, following the manufacturer’s instructions of the TruSeq SBS v3-HS Kit (fc-401-3002, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
Raw reads were discarded if they contained more than two N bases; then the adaptors and the low-quality bases of sequences were removed, and reads less than 16 nt were discarded again by the FASTX-Toolkit (v. 0.0.13) [17]. Finally, the quality of the reads after cleaning was assessed by FastQC (v. 0.11.2): reads with a’ quality value of more than Q30 (correct rate more than 99.9%) were called clean reads and could be used in the next step [18].

2.5. RNA Seq Data Assembly and Functional Assignment

The reference genome (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/002/263/795/GCF_002263795.1_ARS-UCD1.2/GCF_002263795.1_ARS-UCD1.2_genomic.fna.gz) and annotation file of zebu cattle (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all/GCF/002/263/795/GCF_002263795.1_ARS-UCD1.2/GCF_002263795.1_ARS-UCD1.2_genomic.gff.gz) were downloaded from the NCBI database. Then the clean reads were aligned against the reference genome by TopHat2 (v. 2.1.1) (mismatch is set to 2; the other parameters are the defaults) [19]. HTSeq (v. 0.11.2) was used to estimate the relative transcript abundance and the calculation method is fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM) [20].
The Bioconductor package DESeq2 (v. 1.6.2) was used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the pituitary glands of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle [21], and the fold changes (FC) along with the associated p-values of DEGs were obtained (Supplementary Materials Table S3). The threshold of adjusted p-value < 0.05 and log2 |FoldChange| > 3 was used to define the DEGs.

2.6. Verification of Sequencing Data by RT-qPCR

In order to verify the accuracy of sequencing data and whether they could well represent the expression of genes, 10 randomly selected genes (GHRHR, JAG1, FAM92B, SRMS, OPRK1, NELL2, FNIP2, SYTL2, CXCL14, and HTR3E) were used to compare gene expression levels in the samples measured by RT-qPCR and the FPKM values in RNA-seq data.
TRIzol Reagent (15596-026, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract the total RNAs from the same RNA-seq pituitary samples. RNA quality and quantity were assessed using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, Munich, Germany) and evaluated by the RNA integrity number (RIN) in a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Then the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (RR047A, Takara, Dalian, China) was used to reverse transcribe the total RNA of each sample into cDNA in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Beacon designer (v. 8.02) [22] was used to design the primers of the selected genes, and all the primers were synthesized by TsingKe Biotech (Nanjing, China). The real-time PCR reactions were performed with SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II kit (RR820A, Takara, Dalian, China) on a Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in triplicate, and three housekeeping genes, RPL4, GAPDH, and RPL11, were selected as internal control genes. The geometric mean of the internal control genes was used to normalize the expression data. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the expression of each gene. The details of the primer sequences are given in Table S1.
To evaluate the accuracy of the sequencing data and the reproducibility across replicates, the correlation coefficient (R2) between the expression levels of the 10 selected genes measured by FPKM, and the RT-qPCR was analyzed by a Pearson test conducted on R statistical software program (v. 3.6.2) [23].

2.7. Functional Gene Annotation

The Bioconductor package org.Bt.eg.db (v. 3.10.0) was used to change the bovine official gene symbols to bovine Ensembl gene IDs; then, the Bioconductor package cluster profiler (v. 3.14.3) was used to carry out the gene ontology (GO) terms analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways analysis in the R statistical software program (v. 3.6.2) [23]. If the p-value was less than 0.05, the biological processes and pathways enriched by DEGs were considered to be significantly different.

2.8. PPI Network Construction

In order to discover the DEGs controlling the growth of cattle by regulating the secretion of the growth-related hormones studied in this article, the six encoding proteins genes involved in regulating the secretion of these hormones, GH, IGF-I, Thyrotropin subunit beta precursor (TSHB), Thyroid hormone receptor alpha (THRA), Thyroid hormone receptor beta (THRB), and Insulin (INS), were selected, and the differences in them between Yunling and Leiqiong cattle were calculated by the independent samples t-test method in SPSS (v. 26.0).
A protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was created by Cytoscape (v. 3.8.0) software [24]. DEGs encoding proteins that may have a relationship with the above six genes’ encoding proteins were predicted by the String (v. 11.0) database [25], and their interacting partners were subsequently visualized in Cytoscape (v. 3.8.0) [24].

3. Results

3.1. Growth-Related Hormones’ Expression Analysis

To further understand the mechanism of growth and development of zebu cattle, the contents of growth-related hormones including GH, IGF-1, TSH, triiodothyronine, thyroxine, and insulin were detected; the results are shown in Figure 1. From the results, we know that the concentrations of the six hormones are all significantly different in the plasma of Yunling cattle and Leiqiong cattle (p < 0.05). Of these, the concentrations of GH, IGF-1, TSH, triiodothyronine, and thyroxine were significantly higher in Yunling cattle, and the concentration of insulin was higher in Leiqiong cattle (Figure 1).

3.2. Summary of Mapping Statistics

On average, 60,936,319 raw reads for each sample was generated by sequencing the pituitary glands of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle. After cutting the adapter sequences of reads and discarding the low-quality reads, 91.12% to 94.80% of the raw reads were retained, of which 84.65% to 93.51% of the reads had an error rate less than 0.1% (Q30). Among the reads with a quality value greater than Q30, 85.25% and 71.42% of reads from Yunling and Leiqiong cattle, respectively, were mapped to unique bovine genomic locations (Table 1). It is shown in the information of alignment (Figure 2a) that most of the unique reads (on average, 78.63% in Yunling cattle and 78.37% in Leiqiong) were mapped to the exons of genome, while just 11.30% to 9.60% were mapped to the introns and 10.07% to 12.03% were mapped to the intergenic regions.

3.3. Characteristics of Expression Profile Data

In total, 16,009 annotated genes with FPKM higher than 0.1 were identified (Table S2). Of these, 15,682 were co-expressed between Yunling and Leiqiong pituitary gland samples, while only 131 (0.82%) genes were expressed only in Yunling cattle and 196 (1.22%) only in Leiqiong cattle (Figure 2b).
The expression distribution of all detected genes was compared between Yunling and Leiqiong cattle, and it was shown that the vast majority of genes’ FPKM were between 1 and 100 (79.22% in Yunling cattle and 76.39% in Leiqiong cattle); only a few genes’ FPKM were larger than 100 (3.01% in Yunling cattle and 3.31% in Leiqiong cattle). It is also interesting to note that the number of genes of the two breeds, divided according to the order of magnitude of FPKM, was quite similar (Figure 3a). In addition, the FPKM values of the six selected housekeeping genes, including hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (HPRT1), ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4), GAPDH, ribosomal protein L11 (RPL11), ribosomal protein S27a (RPS27A), and ribosomal protein L13A (RPL13A), were analyzed by independent samples t-test performed in SPSS (v. 26.0), and there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two cattle breeds. In summary, the overall expression of the detected genes in the pituitary glands of the Yunling and Leiqiong cattle groups was very similar (Figure 3b).

3.4. Validation of Samples’ Reproduction and RNA-seq Data’s Accuracy

To estimate the reproducibility between samples, a principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on R statistical software program (v. 3.6.2) [23] based on the FPKM value of the co-expressed genes. Principal component 1 (PC1) and principal component 2 (PC2) together explained 73.4% of the total variance (PC1 accounted for 54.8% and PC2 accounted for 18.6%). It is shown that samples from the Yunling and Leiqiong cattle groups can be clearly separated and gather within groups, which indicates that our samples are reproducible in each group (Figure 4a).
To quantitatively determine the reliability of RNA-Seq data, we performed RT-qPCR on 10 randomly selected genes, FNIP2, FAM92B, JAG1, GHRHR, OPRK1, CXCL14, NELL2, SYTL2, HTR3E, and SRMS, to test their expression levels. The average RIN value derived from the six samples was 8.50 ± 1.10, which shows that the quality meets the sequencing requirements. For these 10 selected genes, a linear regression analysis was performed using log2 FC obtained by the RNA-seq and RT-qPCR, which revealed a high correlation (R2 = 0.88219) and confirmed the reliability of the current RNA-seq data in this study (Figure 4b). The inconsistency regarding the ratio may be due to the difference in the algorithms between the two methods.

3.5. Identification of DEGs

A total of 175 DEGs were identified (adjusted p-value < 0.01 and log2 |FoldChange| > 3; Table S3) through statistical analysis of the RNA-seq data of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle pituitary gland samples. Among these DEGs, there were 31 genes that were more highly expressed in the Yunling cattle group and 144 genes in the Leiqiong cattle group. A volcano plot was constructed with the data of adjusted p-value and log2 FC of the DEGs in these two groups (Figure 5). The details of the DEGs, including the name of each gene, the log2 fold change, adjusted p values, and the variation in gene expression differences (UP or DOWN) between the Yunling and Leiqiong cattle groups are presented in Table S3.

3.6. Enrichment Analysis of DEGs

In order to better investigate the function of the 175 DEGs in the pituitary glands of cattle, we performed gene ontology (GO) analysis (Table S4) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis (Table S5) on these genes at the DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) [26]. The top 20 enriched GO biological process terms (p < 0.05) were mainly functionally related to the transcription process, including transcription, DNA-templated, positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter and negative regulation of transcription, DNA-templated, and the genes in these processes accounted for 34.85% of all the genes enriched in the top 20 GO biological process terms. Followed by the signal transduction such as small-GTPase-mediated signal transduction, intracellular signal transduction, neurotrophin TRK receptor signaling pathway, and synaptic transmission and the genes in these processes accounted for 21.20% of all the genes enriched in the top 20 GO biological process terms (Figure 6).
The KEGG analysis results (p < 0.05) listed in Table 2 reveal that the enrichments were mainly related to lipid and protein metabolism, such as Glycerophospholipid metabolism, Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, Mucin type O-glycan biosynthesis, Thyroid hormone signaling pathway, Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorption, and Glutamatergic synapse.

3.7. PPI Network Analysis

All six genes involved in regulating the secretion of the six hormones studied in this article were significantly different (p < 0.05) in the Yunling and Leiqiong cattle pituitary gland samples. More specifically, the expression of GH, IGF-I, TSHB, and THRB was significantly higher in Yunling cattle, while the expression of THRA and INS was significantly higher in the Leiqiong cattle pituitary gland (Figure 7a). Fifteen DEGs’ encoding proteins were predicted to have a relationship with these genes’ encoding proteins, and the PPI network of them is shown in Figure 7b.

4. Discussion

The research on growth and development has important significance for the feeding and management of beef cattle. It is well known that growth is a highly complex and delicate physiological process regulated by nerves and body fluids. Growth axis hormones and their receptors play a significant role in regulating growth, and the pituitary gland is a principal endocrine organ that participates in this process [26,27]. In order to study the growth of cattle, many tissues have already been subjected to high-throughput sequencing, such as the longissimus dorsi muscle, fat, rumen tissues, and so on [28,29,30]. However, research on the effects of gene expression in the pituitary gland on growth is still limited. For the sake of better understanding the molecular mechanisms that control growth in the pituitary glands of cattle, we detected the content of six growth-related hormones in the plasma of two zebu cattle breeds (Yunling and Leiqiong cattle) with significant differences in growth and analyzed the RNA-seq data of their pituitary glands.
The growth and development of ruminants are affected by many factors such as variety, endocrine status, nutrition, and environment. GH is essential to maintaining normal bone growth, including achieving vertical bone growth and bone hardness. In most cases, GH generally affects skeletal cells indirectly through IGF-1 [31]. Thyroxine and triiodothyronine have an accelerating effect on puberty growth in cattle, and the proper addition of thyroxine and triiodothyronine can promote cell growth [32]. It is also found that the injection of thyroxine and triiodothyronine can increase the concentration of IGF in the study of dairy cows [33]. The concentration of GH, IGF, TSH, thyroxine, and triiodothyronine are significantly higher in Yunling cattle than in Leiqiong cattle, which indicates that these hormones may promote the growth and development of beef cattle and might be the direct cause of differences in growth (Figure 1). Insulin participates in the regulation of carbohydrate and fat metabolism and controls the balance of blood sugar, which can prompt the liver and skeletal muscle cells to convert the glucose in the blood into original sugar—that is, converting the blood sugar into hepatic sugar and intracellular glucose and insulin can increase the synthesis of glycogen fatty acids and proteins in cells [34]. During refeeding and compensatory growth in cattle, the secretion of insulin is sharply enhanced and the plasma GH concentrations are high, which leads to increased fat deposition [35]. This is different in our present study because all the experimental cattle had sufficient food every day. In this study, the concentration of GH was higher in Yunling cattle but insulin was higher in Leiqiong cattle; this may be caused by the following three reasons: (1) the differences in breeds—Leiqiong cattle are known to be more irritable and have stronger disease resistance [15]; (2) Yunling cattle were still in a growing period at 18 months, whereas the Leiqiong cattle were at a later stage of growth and not growing as much as Yunling—a study has reported that the insulin inhibitory effect in the growth period of cattle is greater than in the later growth period [36]; (3) the live-weight of Yunling cattle was much higher than Leiqiong cattle; as body weight increases, the body becomes more insulin-resistant [37,38].
Another factor that might affect the secretion of the growth-related hormones in Yunling and Leiqiong cattle in this study might be the function of androgen. It was reported that androgens could increase the expression of IGF-I in satellite cells and promote myogenesis in humans [39]. The high concentration of androgen could promote the secretion of insulin by potentiating the insulinotropic action of glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) in the study of rats [40] but had no significant effect on the secretion of thyroxine and triiodothyronine [41]. Although all of the cattle were in the stage of sexual maturity throughout the 6-month experiment, the androgen concentration might differ between the two breeds and may have affected the secretion of growth-related hormones in this study, but this also needs to be confirmed by further experiments.
Although a vast majority of the unique reads were located in the exon region (on average: 78.50%), a considerable amount of them were still mapped to the intronic (10.45%) and intergenic (11.05%) regions (Figure 2a); in fact, it was revealed that in the intronic and intergenic regions, large amounts of noncoding RNAs could be transcribed from and perform essential molecular functions [42,43], so genome annotation work in cattle still needs to be constantly improved. Even if the breeds of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle are different, a majority of genes are expressed at quite similar levels between them (Figure 3a). This result was the same as in our previous research on Simmental and Wenshan cattle [44], which illustrates a possibility that, in beef cattle, the main variation in gene expression might be caused by differences in tissue rather than variety.
Ensuring the accuracy of data, including sampling and sequencing, is a prerequisite for subsequent analysis. In this study, the expression levels of the six random selected housekeeping genes were not significantly different between the two groups (Figure 3b), which illustrated the uniformity of sequencing data between samples. Two principal components that contributed the most to the overall variance of the six samples, PC1 and PC2, were extracted, and the pituitary gland samples of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle were clearly separated in the PCA figure plotted according to PC1 and PC2 (Figure 4a), which illustrated the repeatability of samples collection. (We speculated that PC1 and PC2 might highly be correlated with the expression of growth-related genes because the distribution of these six samples was roughly in accordance with the daily gain of the two breeds during the six-month experiment; for example, the pituitary gland samples of Yunling group and Leiqiong group were clearly separated might due to the average daily gain of Yunling and Leiqiong was significantly different, and the Yunling group was not as close in the PCA plot as the Leiqiong cattle group, which may be caused by the variance in daily gain in the Yunling cattle group being higher than in the Leiqiong cattle group.) The log2 FC of 10 randomly selected genes calculated by two methods, RT-qPCR and RNA-seq data (Figure 4b), were significantly correlated with each other, which illustrated the accuracy of sequencing data. The above all revealed that the accuracy of data was reliable in this study.
In the present study, a total of 175 DEGs were identified between the pituitary glands of Yunling and Leiqiong cattle (Figure 5). These genes are mainly involved in the process of transcription and signal transduction, such as DNA-templated, positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, negative regulation of transcription, DNA-templated, small GTPase mediated signal transduction, intracellular signal transduction, neurotrophin TRK receptor signaling pathway, and synaptic transmission (Figure 6). The process of transcription is an important way for genes to participate in the regulation of the body, and the efficiency of the process has an important impact on biological growth and development [45,46]. Studies have reported that the GO term small GTPase-mediated signal transduction can act upstream of mTOR to regulate the growth of HEK293 cells [47], and the mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway has recently been examined in ovarian follicles in mice, where it regulates granulosa cell proliferation and differentiation [48]. Via the neurotrophin TRK receptor signaling pathway, the Akt and MAPK pathways can control and transmit signals of cell growth and development [49]. Therefore, we infer that differences in transcription levels in the pituitary gland are one of the reasons for the growth levels in Yunling cattle being higher than in Leiqiong cattle.
DEGs are enriched in the 13 KEGG pathway, and some of them are related to tissue growth by regulating growth-related hormones (Table 2). Glutamatergic synapse can develop the growth neurons and promote the construction of cortical networks by affecting the expression of Growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) [50]. The Thyroid hormone signaling pathway plays a key role in muscle formation and fat metabolism in pigs by regulating thyroid hormones [51]. Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism can regulate pancreas development, muscle formation, and post-embryonic development in cattle [52]. The Glycerophospholipid metabolism pathway can inhibit insulin signaling and affect lipid production and metabolic processes in dairy cattle [53]. In studies of mice and poultry, it was also found that the Neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction pathway can regulate the growth and sexual maturity of individuals by affecting the release of growth hormone, thyroid hormone, and insulin [54,55]. Besides these pathways, many genes have been found to be candidate genes in the pituitary gland that may influence the growth of cattle, such as SLC38A1, SLC38A3, DGKH, GNB4, GNAQ, ESR1, NPY, and GAL.
Solute carrier family 38 member 1 (SLC38A1) and solute carrier family 38 member 3 (SLC38A3) are members of solute carrier family 38; they are amino acid transporter proteins that increase with age during growth. Interestingly, SLC38A1 was abundantly expressed in the Yunling cattle’s pituitary glands, and SLC38A3 was abundantly expressed in the Leiqiong cattle’s pituitary glands. In our previous study, we also found that SLC38A4 was abundantly expressed in the Simmental cattle pituitary gland compared with Wenshan cattle [56]. There are many reports to prove that SLC38A1, SLC38A3, and SLC38A4 are involved in mammalian growth regulation, and SLC38A1 and SLC38A4 are primarily implicated in growth control of the embryo and can positively regulate prenatal growth by regulating the release of insulin [57]. Downregulation of SLC38A3 can reduce amino acid availability and impair growth in mice [58]. These results demonstrate that solute carrier family 38 genes have crucial functions in secretory pathways and could regulate the growth and development of beef cattle in the pituitary gland, but their specific responsibilities are different.
Diacylglycerol kinase eta (DGKH) was proposed as a regulator protein of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling cascade, which controls a vast number of growths regulating processes in cells, including proliferation, transformation, and differentiation [59]. A study in German Holstein cattle also showed that DGKH could affect the signal transduction process of GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) and regulated divergent growth at the onset of puberty [60]. However, there is no relevant research report on beef cattle.
G protein subunit alpha q (GNAQ) gene is one of the candidate genes that relate to the growth of cattle. Among the 13 KEGG pathways that are differentially expressed, GNAQ appears in six pathways (Glutamatergic synapse, Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorption, Circadian entrainment, Dopaminergic synapse, Gap junction, and Spinocerebellar ataxia). By knocking down the GNAQ gene in the mouse pituitary gland, the postnatal proliferation of pituitary somatotroph cells was strongly impaired, and plasma growth hormone (GH) levels were reduced to 15%. The hypothalamic levels of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), an important stimulator of somatotroph proliferation, were strongly decreased, which causes somatotroph hypoplasia, dwarfism, and anorexia in mice [61]. In a study of Kazakh sheep, it was also demonstrated that appropriate folate concentrations could promote GANQ promoter methylation, which in turn affected GnRH secretion and the growth of sheep [62]. It has also been suggested that, in humans, a primary effect of GNAQ variance on cAMP levels in the thyroid would affect the production of T4 and T3 and feedback to alter TSH release by the pituitary gland [63]. It can be inferred that GNAQ participates in the expression process of multiple classic pituitary hormones in the mammalian pituitary, and its expression has an important regulatory effect on growth and development. However, currently there is no relevant research available on the GNAQ gene in cattle, so conducting in-depth research on the effect and mechanism of GNAQ in the pituitary gland is of great significance to the development of beef cattle.
Studies have also shown that the mutation of GNB4 can affect human muscle growth [64]. In breast cancer samples, overexpression of ESR1 can promote cell growth by enhancing the IGF signaling pathway [65]. NPY and GAL genes could regulate the feeling of hunger by influencing the secretion of insulin and GH [66].
The transcription level (measured by FPKM value) of the genes involved in regulating the above six hormones, including GH, IGF-I, TSHB, THRA, THRB, and INS, were also significantly different with Yunling and Leiqiong group (Figure 7a). The transcription levels of these genes were consistent with the hormone concentration in blood of the two breeds (Figure 1), except THRA, which was higher in the Leiqiong than the Yunling group. Although the action of triiodothyronine and thyroxine was predominantly mediated by thyroid hormone receptors THRA and THRB, the effect of THRA was very low, and THRA mutations had little effect on the HPT axis [67,68]. Perhaps the differences in triiodothyronine and thyroid hormones in the blood were mainly caused by the different transcription levels of THRB in this study. The study also showed that mRNA transcript abundances can only explain about 40% of the variance in protein levels [69]. Future experiments are necessary to verify the relationships between these genes and their impacts on protein levels.
Fifteen DEGs’ encoding proteins were predicted to have a regulation relationship with the growth axis hormones studied in this research (GH, IGF-1, TSH, triiodothyronine, thyroxine, and insulin). Combined with the KEGG results, seven genes, GNB4, GNAQ, ESR1, NPY, GAL, KLK1, and CLOCK, were again detected in the PPI network results (Figure 7b) and GNB4, GNAQ, ESR1, NPY, and GAL in the pathways we have stated that affect hormone regulation. Therefore, combining the results of KEGG and PPI, it is possible that in Yunling and Leiqiong cattle, differential expression of SLC38A1, SLC38A3, DGKH, GNB4, GNAQ, ESR1, NPY, and GAL caused the secretion of growth-related hormones in the pituitary gland to be different, and eventually caused a variation in growth.
Determination of functional genes is helpful to the domestication and selective breeding of livestock species [70]. Artificial selection could target a lot of functional genes that could contribute to the improvement of traits that humans need, such as meat production, and increase the frequency of these favorable genes [71]. Yunling cattle were bred by cross-breeding (Brahman (1/2), Murray Grey (1/4), and Chinese native cattle (1/4)) for almost 40 years, and their growth and development were greatly improved, which was also mainly due to the favorable accumulation of gene frequency by artificial selection [72]. The live weight of a Brahman bull can reach 900 kg, which is much higher than Chinese native cattle [73], and Brahman may provide excellent genetic information for the growth of Yunling cattle breed. Studies have shown that the higher expression of NPY in hypothalamic could increase the release of NPY, which significantly increased the weight of Brahman cattle [74]. The expression changes of ESR1 in pituitary gland could regulate the tissue and organ development of the pubertal Brahman cattle [75]. Then, it was supposed that in the process of cultivating and artificial selection of Yunling cattle during generations, the frequency of the eight genes, SLC38A1, SLC38A3, DGKH, GNB4, GNAQ, ESR1, NPY, and GAL, that were identified may be related to the growth of Yunling cattle in this study, which would gradually be changed to meet the needs of meat production and adapting to various environments. Further experiments like polymorphism detection of these genes for each generation of Yunling cattle might more deeply explain the hypothesis.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study provides a basic exploration of the genes expressed in the pituitary glands of zebu cattle and identifies key genes that could regulate the secretion of growth-related hormones. The significant differences in the concentrations of GH, IGF, TSH, thyroxine, triiodothyronine, and insulin in the plasma might be the main cause of the growth differences in cattle. Overall expression distribution of the identified genes was quite similar between the Yunling and Leiqiong cattle, and a total of 175 genes were identified as differentially expressed genes, which are mainly involved in the process of transcription and signal transduction. We also identified eight genes, SLC38A1, SLC38A3, DGKH, GNB4, GNAQ, ESR1, NPY, and GAL, that may have a critical role in regulating the growth and development of zebu cattle. These genes may affect the secretion of growth-related hormones in the pituitary gland, which causes the differences in growth of the two breeds. Our findings will help researchers further understand the mechanism of the pituitary gland’s influence on growth and development in cattle, and the results may contribute to the artificial selection and development of the beef cattle industry.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/8/1271/s1, Table S1: Specific primers used for qRT-PCR. Table S2: Genes expressed in the pituitary gland. Table S3: Differentially expressed genes. Table S4: Enriched GO terms. Table S5 Enriched KEGG pathways.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Y.; data curation, X.L.; formal analysis, A.A.I.A.; funding acquisition, Z.Y. and Y.S.; investigation, X.L., Z.Z., and Y.F.; methodology, Q.G., and Y.S.; resources, Z.H.; software, X.L. and A.A.I.A.; validation, Z.Y.; writing—original draft, X.L.; writing—review and editing, Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Earmarked Fund for Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System (JATS (2019) 446), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872324), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31902147).

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephen Moore of the University of Queensland for providing us guidance on transcriptome knowledge. We thank Yongjiang Mao of the Yangzhou University for all his advice in setting up the study. Lastly, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hocquette, J.; Gondret, F.; Baéza, E.; Médale, F.; Jurie, C.; Pethick, D.W. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: Development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal 2009, 4, 303–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Tian, X.; Wang, F.; He, C.; Zhang, L.; Tan, D.; Reiter, R.J.; Xu, J.; Ji, P.; Liu, G.J. Beneficial effects of melatonin on bovine oocytes maturation: A mechanistic approach. J. Pineal Res. 2014, 57, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Davis, S.W.; Ellsworth, B.S.; Millan, M.I.P.; Gergics, P.; Schade, V.; Foyouzi, N.; Brinkmeier, M.L.; Mortensen, A.H.; Camper, S.A. Pituitary Gland Development and Disease. In Current Topics in Developmental Biology; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 106, pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lucy, M. Functional Differences in the Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factor Axis in Cattle and Pigs: Implications for Post-partum Nutrition and Reproduction. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008, 43, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Spicer, L.J.; Aad, P. Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) 2 Stimulates Steroidogenesis and Mitosis of Bovine Granulosa Cells Through the IGF1 Receptor: Role of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and IGF2 Receptor1. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 77, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gkourogianni, A.; Andrade, A.C.; Jonsson, B.; Segerlund, E.; Werner-Sperker, A.; Horemuzova, E.; Dahlgren, J.; Burstedt, M.; Nilsson, O. Pre- and postnatal growth failure with microcephaly due to two novel heterozygous IGF1R mutations and response to growth hormone treatment. Acta Paediatr. 2020, 00, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Chagas, L.; Bass, J.; Blache, D.; Burke, C.; Kay, J.; Lindsay, D.; Lucy, M.; Martin, G.B.; Meier, S.; Rhodes, F.; et al. Invited Review: New Perspectives on the Roles of Nutrition and Metabolic Priorities in the Subfertility of High-Producing Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 4022–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fonseca, P.A.D.S.; Id-Lahoucine, S.; Reverter, A.; Medrano, J.F.; Fortes, M.R.S.; Casellas, J.; Miglior, F.; Brito, L.; Carvalho, M.R.S.; Schenkel, F.S.; et al. Combining multi-OMICs information to identify key-regulator genes for pleiotropic effect on fertility and production traits in beef cattle. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pal, R.P.; Mani, V.; Tripathi, D.; Kumar, R.; KewalRamani, N.J. Influence of Feeding Inorganic Vanadium on Growth Performance, Endocrine Variables and Biomarkers of Bone Health in Crossbred Calves. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 182, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seabury, C.; Oldeschulte, D.; Saatchi, M.; Beever, J.E.; Decker, J.E.; Halley, Y.A.; Bhattarai, E.K.; Molaei, M.; Freetly, H.C.; Hansen, S.L.; et al. Genome-wide association study for feed efficiency and growth traits in U.S. beef cattle. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Steele, M.; Penner, G.B.; Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Guan, L.L. Development and physiology of the rumen and the lower gut: Targets for improving gut health. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 4955–4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nguyen, L.T.; Reverter, A.; Venus, B.; Islas-Trejo, A.; Porto-Neto, L.R.; Lehnert, S.A.; Medrano, J.F.; Moore, S.S.; Fortes, M.R.S.; Cánovas, A. Global differential gene expression in the pituitary gland and the ovaries of pre- and postpubertal Brahman heifers1. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 599–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Xia, X.; Qu, K.; Li, F.; Jia, P.; Chen, Q.; Chen, N.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, B.; Lei, C. Abundant Genetic Diversity of Yunling Cattle Based on Mitochondrial Genome. Animals 2019, 9, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, L.-P.; Geng, R.-Q.; Chang, H. Mitochondrial DNA Diversity and Origin of Chinese Leiqiong Cattle. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2009, 8, 1312–1315. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, F.; Qu, K.; Chen, N.; Hanif, Q.; Jia, Y.; Huang, Y.-Z.; Dang, R.; Zhang, J.; Lan, X.; Chen, H.; et al. Genome-Wide SNPs and InDels Characteristics of Three Chinese Cattle Breeds. Animals 2019, 9, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. He, R.; Gu, X.; Lai, W.; Peng, X.; Yang, G.-Y. Transcriptome-microRNA analysis of Sarcoptes scabiei and host immune response. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, G.; Zhao, G.; Xia, J.; Wei, Y.; Chen, F.; Chen, J.; Shi, J. FGF2 and FAM201A affect the development of osteonecrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture. Gene 2018, 652, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kroll, K.W.; Mokaram, N.E.; Pelletier, A.R.; Frankhouser, D.E.; Westphal, M.S.; Stump, P.A.; Stump, C.L.; Bundschuh, R.; Blachly, J.S.; Yan, P.S. Quality Control for RNA-Seq (QuaCRS): An Integrated Quality Control Pipeline. Cancer Inform. 2014, 13, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, D.; Pertea, G.; Trapnell, C.; Pimentel, H.; Kelley, R.; Salzberg, S. TopHat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Anders, S.; Pyl, P.T.; Huber, W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2014, 31, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Thornton, B.; Basu, C. Rapid and Simple Method of qPCR Primer Design. Adv. Struct. Saf. Stud. 2015, 1275, 173–179. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yu, G.; Wang, L.-G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.-Y. Clusterprofiler: An R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2012, 16, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, J.; Leung, F.K.C.; Stuart, M.C.A.; Kajitani, T.; Fukushima, T.; Van Der Giessen, E.; Feringa, B.L. Artificial muscle-like function from hierarchical supramolecular assembly of photoresponsive molecular motors. Nat. Chem. 2017, 10, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mullur, R.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Brent, G.A. Thyroid hormone regulation of metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 355–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tsigos, C.; Chrousos, G.P. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. J. Psychosom. Res. 2002, 53, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gholizadeh, M.; Fayazi, J.; Asgari, Y.; Zali, H.; Kaderali, L. Reconstruction and Analysis of Cattle Metabolic Networks in Normal and Acidosis Rumen Tissue. Animals 2020, 10, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jiang, R.; Li, H.; Huang, Y.; Lan, X.; Lei, C.; Chen, H. Transcriptome profiling of lncRNA related to fat tissues of Qinchuan cattle. Gene 2020, 742, 144587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yan, X.-M.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, Y.; Li, H.-B.; Gao, L.; Luo, D.; Jiang, H.; Gao, Y.; Yuan, B.; Zhang, J.-B. Genome-wide identification and analysis of circular RNAs differentially expressed in the longissimus dorsi between Kazakh cattle and Xinjiang brown cattle. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8646. [Google Scholar]
  31. Giustina, A.; Mazziotti, G.; Canalis, E. Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors, and the skeleton. Endocr. Rev. 2008, 29, 535–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Webb, E.C.; Casey, N. Physiological limits to growth and the related effects on meat quality. Livest. Sci. 2010, 130, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Huszenicza, G.; Kulcsar, M.; Kóródi, P.; Bartyik, J.; Rudas, P.; Ribiczei-Szabo, P.; Nikolić-Judith, A.; Šamanc, H.; Ivanov, I.; Gvozdić, D. Adrenocortical and thyroid function, hormone and metabolite profiles and the onset of ovarian cyclicity in dairy cows suffering from various forms of ketosis. Acta Vet. 2006, 56, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saltiel, A.R.; Kahn, C.R. Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 2001, 414, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hornick, J.-L.; Van Eenaeme, C.; Gérard, O.; Dufrasne, I.; Istasse, L. Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2000, 19, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, P.; Drackley, J.; Stamey-Lanier, J.; Keisler, D.; Loor, J. Effects of level of nutrient intake and age on mammalian target of rapamycin, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor-1 gene network expression in skeletal muscle of young Holstein calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Qin, L.; Xiang, Y.; Song, Z.; Jing, R.; Hu, C.; Howard, S.T. Retraction notice to “Erythropoietin as a possible mechanism for the effects of intermittent hypoxia on bodyweight, serum glucose and leptin in mice”. Regul. Pept. 2010, 165, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sauerwein, H.; Bendixen, E.; Restelli, L.; Ceciliani, F. The adipose tissue in farm animals: A proteomic approach. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2014, 15, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grace, F.M.; Scultorpe, N.; Solomon, A.; Bouloux, P.; Lewis, M. Androgens Affect Myogenesis In Vitro in Association with Increased Local Igf-1 Expression. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011, 43, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, W.; Morford, J.; Mauvais-Jarvis, F. Emerging role of testosterone in pancreatic β cell function and insulin secretion. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 240, R97–R105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cristina, R.; Hanganu, F.; Dumitrescu, E.; Muselin, F.; Butnariu, M.; Constantin, A.; Chiurciu, V. The Impact of Exogenic Testosterone and Nortestosterone-Decanoate Toxicological Evaluation Using a Rat Model. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, X.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Cai, H.; Lan, X.; Huang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Qi, X.; Chen, H. The developmental transcriptome sequencing of bovine skeletal muscle reveals a long noncoding RNA, lncMD, promotes muscle differentiation by sponging miR-125b. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863, 2835–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, W.; Li, D.; Wang, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, W.; Li, S. Three intronic lncRNAs with monoallelic expression derived from the MEG8 gene in cattle. Anim. Genet. 2016, 48, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, M.; Lu, X.; Xia, H.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, H.; Qu, K.; Huang, B.; Moore, S.; et al. In-depth characterization of the pituitary transcriptome in Simmental and Chinese native cattle. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2019, 66, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Carninci, P.; Kasukawa, T.; Katayama, S.; Gough, J.; Frith, M.C.; Maeda, N.; Oyama, R.; Ravasi, T.; Lenhard, B.; Wells, C.; et al. The Transcriptional Landscape of the Mammalian Genome. Science 2005, 309, 1559–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Inoki, K.; Li, Y.; Xu, T.; Guan, K.-L. Rheb GTPase is a direct target of TSC2 GAP activity and regulates mTOR signaling. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1829–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yaba, A.; Demir, N. The mechanism of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) in a mouse model of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). J. Ovarian Res. 2012, 5, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Huang, E.J.; Reichardt, L.F. Trk Receptors: Roles in Neuronal Signal Transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003, 72, 609–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Damonte, V.M.; Rodríguez, S.S.; Raingo, J.; Valentina, M.D.; Susana, R.S.; Jesica, R. Growth hormone secretagogue receptor constitutive activity impairs voltage-gated calcium channel-dependent inhibitory neurotransmission in hippocampal neurons. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 5415–5428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Dalrymple, B.P.; Guo, B. Triennial Growth and Development Symposium: Intramuscular fat deposition in ruminants and pigs: A transcriptomics perspective1. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 2272–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sinclair, K.D.; A Lunn, L.; Kwong, W.Y.; Wonnacott, K.; Linforth, R.; Craigon, J. Amino acid and fatty acid composition of follicular fluid as predictors of in-vitro embryo development. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2008, 16, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Divya, B.K.; Mohindra, V.; Singh, R.K.; Yadav, P.; Masih, P.; Jena, J.K. Muscle transcriptome resource for growth, lipid metabolism and immune system in Hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha. Genes Genom. 2018, 41, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, B.; Liang, G.; Zhu, X.; Tan, Y.; Xu, J.; Wu, H.; Mao, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Rao, Y.; et al. Gene Expression Profiling in Ovaries and Association Analyses Reveal HEP21 as a Candidate Gene for Sexual Maturity in Chickens. Animals 2020, 10, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Komenoi, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Asami, M.; Murakami, C.; Hoshino, F.; Chiba, S.; Takahashi, D.; Kado, S.; Sakane, F. Microarray analysis of gene expression in the diacylglycerol kinase η knockout mouse brain. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2019, 19, 100660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, F.; Chen, F.; Li, L.; Yan, L.; Badri, T.; Lv, C.; Yu, D.; Zhang, M.; Jang, X.; Li, J.; et al. Three Novel Players: PTK2B, SYK, and TNFRSF21 Were Identified to Be Involved in the Regulation of Bovine Mastitis Susceptibility via GWAS and Post-transcriptional Analysis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Vaughan, O.R.; Sferruzzi-Perri, A.N.; Fowden, A.L. Maternal corticosterone regulates nutrient allocation to fetal growth in mice. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 5529–5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chan, K.; Busque, S.M.; Sailer, M.; Stoeger, C.; Broer, S.; Daniel, H.; Rubio-Aliaga, I.; Wagner, C.A. Loss of function mutation of the Slc38a3 glutamine transporter reveals its critical role for amino acid metabolism in the liver, brain, and kidney. Pflügers Arch.-Eur. J. Physiol. 2015, 468, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kolch, W. Meaningful relationships: The regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions. Biochem. J. 2000, 351, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Widmann, P.; Reverter, A.; Fortes, M.R.S.; Weikard, R.; Suhre, K.; Hammon, H.M.; Albrecht, E.; Kühn, C. A systems biology approach using metabolomic data reveals genes and pathways interacting to modulate divergent growth in cattle. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wettschureck, N.; Moers, A.; Wallenwein, B.; Parlow, A.F.; Maser-Gluth, C.; Offermanns, S. Loss of Gq/11 Family G Proteins in the Nervous System Causes Pituitary Somatotroph Hypoplasia and Dwarfism in Mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 1942–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zhai, M.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, M.; Liang, Y.; Liang, H.; Xie, Y.; Han, J. The effect of GNAQ methylation on GnRH secretion in sheep hypothalamic neurons. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 19396–19405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Arnaud-Lopez, L.; Usala, G.; Ceresini, G.; Mitchell, B.D.; Pilia, M.G.; Piras, M.G.; Sestu, N.; Maschio, A.; Busonero, F.; Albai, G.; et al. Phosphodiesterase 8B Gene Variants Are Associated with Serum TSH Levels and Thyroid Function. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 82, 1270–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Fukuda, T.; Hiraide, T.; Yamoto, K.; Nakashima, M.; Kawai, T.; Yanagi, K.; Ogata, T.; Saitsu, H. Exome reports A de novo GNB2 variant associated with global developmental delay, intellectual disability, and dysmorphic features. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2020, 63, 103804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gelsomino, L.; Gu, G.; Rechoum, Y.; Beyer, A.R.; Pejerrey, S.M.; Tsimelzon, A.; Wang, T.; Huffman, K.; Ludlow, A.; Andò, S.; et al. ESR1 mutations affect anti-proliferative responses to tamoxifen through enhanced cross-talk with IGF signaling. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016, 157, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Sárközy, M.; Szűcs, G.; Pipicz, M.; Zvara, Á.; Éder, K.; Fekete, V.; Szűcs, C.; Bárkányi, J.; Csonka, C.; Puskás, L.G.; et al. The effect of a preparation of minerals, vitamins and trace elements on the cardiac gene expression pattern in male diabetic rats. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2015, 14, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ortiga-Carvalho, T.M.; Sidhaye, A.R.; Wondisford, F.E. Thyroid hormone receptors and resistance to thyroid hormone disorders. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 582–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Jones, I.; Srinivas, M.; Ng, L.; Forrest, U. The Thyroid Hormone ReceptorβGene: Structure and Functions in the Brain and Sensory Systems. Thyroid 2003, 13, 1057–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Payne, S.H. The utility of protein and mRNA correlation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2014, 40, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Rochus, C.M.; Tortereau, F.; Plisson-Petit, F.; Restoux, G.; Moreno-Romieux, C.; Tosser-Klopp, G.; Servin, B. Revealing the selection history of adaptive loci using genome-wide scans for selection: An example from domestic sheep. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lim, D.; Gondro, C.; Park, H.S.; Cho, Y.M.; Chai, H.H.; Seong, H.H.; Yang, B.S.; Hong, S.K.; Chang, W.K.; Lee, S.H. Identification of Recently Selected Mutations Driven by Artificial Selection in Hanwoo (Korean Cattle). Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Hayes, B.J.; Chamberlain, A.J.; MacEachern, S.; Savin, K.; McPartlan, H.; MacLeod, I.; Sethuraman, L.; Goddard, M. A genome map of divergent artificial selection betweenBos taurusdairy cattle andBos taurusbeef cattle. Anim. Genet. 2009, 40, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bolormaa, S.; Pryce, J.; Kemper, K.E.; Savin, K.; Hayes, B.J.; Barendse, W.; Zhang, Y.; Reich, C.M.; Mason, B.A.; Bunch, R.J.; et al. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle1. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 3088–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Cardoso, R.C.; Alves, B.R.C.; Prezotto, L.D.; Thorson, J.F.; O Tedeschi, L.; Keisler, D.; Amstalden, M.; Williams, G. Reciprocal changes in leptin and NPY during nutritional acceleration of puberty in heifers. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 223, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Weller, M.; Fortes, M.R.S.; Porto-Neto, L.; Kelly, M.; Venus, B.; Kidd, L.; Rego, J.P.A.D.; Edwards, S.; Boe-Hansen, G.; Piper, E.; et al. Candidate Gene Expression in Bos indicus Ovarian Tissues: Prepubertal and Postpubertal Heifers in Diestrus. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Animals 10 01271 g001 550
Figure 1. The concentration of hormones in the plasma of the two breeds (the black columns are Yunling cattle and the red columns are Leiqiong cattle, ** p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The concentration of hormones in the plasma of the two breeds (the black columns are Yunling cattle and the red columns are Leiqiong cattle, ** p < 0.05).
Animals 10 01271 g001
Animals 10 01271 g002 550
Figure 2. Genome alignment profiles. (a) The percentage of reads mapping to indicate genomic regions: exonic (gray), intronic (red), intergenic (yellow). (b) Venn diagram depicting the co-expressed (purple region) and uniquely expressed genes (blue region and red region) discovered in the pituitary glands of the two cattle breeds.
Figure 2. Genome alignment profiles. (a) The percentage of reads mapping to indicate genomic regions: exonic (gray), intronic (red), intergenic (yellow). (b) Venn diagram depicting the co-expressed (purple region) and uniquely expressed genes (blue region and red region) discovered in the pituitary glands of the two cattle breeds.
Animals 10 01271 g002
Animals 10 01271 g003 550
Figure 3. Basic analysis of RNA-Seq data. (a) Distribution of the numbers of detected genes at different expression levels measured by FPKM (mean ± SEM); (b) expression levels of six housekeeping genes in the pituitary glands of the two breeds measured by FPKM (mean ± SEM). FPKM, fragments per kilobase per million.
Figure 3. Basic analysis of RNA-Seq data. (a) Distribution of the numbers of detected genes at different expression levels measured by FPKM (mean ± SEM); (b) expression levels of six housekeeping genes in the pituitary glands of the two breeds measured by FPKM (mean ± SEM). FPKM, fragments per kilobase per million.
Animals 10 01271 g003
Animals 10 01271 g004 550
Figure 4. Validation of the accuracy of data. (a) Principal component analysis (PCA) results of the profiling data (circles represent Yunling cattle and triangles represent Leiqiong cattle); (b) correlation between RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data. The correlation coefficient between RNA seq (y-axis) and RT-qPCR (x-axis) data (log2 fold change) was analyzed by a Pearson test. R2 is 0.88219 with a statistical significance of p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Validation of the accuracy of data. (a) Principal component analysis (PCA) results of the profiling data (circles represent Yunling cattle and triangles represent Leiqiong cattle); (b) correlation between RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data. The correlation coefficient between RNA seq (y-axis) and RT-qPCR (x-axis) data (log2 fold change) was analyzed by a Pearson test. R2 is 0.88219 with a statistical significance of p < 0.05.
Animals 10 01271 g004
Animals 10 01271 g005 550
Figure 5. Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Yunling and Leiqiong cattle pituitary glands. The red dots represent the upregulated transcripts (log2 fold change > 3, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01), and the blue dots represent the downregulated transcripts (log2 fold change < −3, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01).
Figure 5. Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Yunling and Leiqiong cattle pituitary glands. The red dots represent the upregulated transcripts (log2 fold change > 3, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01), and the blue dots represent the downregulated transcripts (log2 fold change < −3, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01).
Animals 10 01271 g005
Animals 10 01271 g006 550
Figure 6. Gene ontology analysis (biological process) of differentially expressed genes between Yunling and Leiqiong cattle pituitary glands. (The top 20 enriched gene ontology (GO) biological process terms (p < 0.05. Each color represents a term.)).
Figure 6. Gene ontology analysis (biological process) of differentially expressed genes between Yunling and Leiqiong cattle pituitary glands. (The top 20 enriched gene ontology (GO) biological process terms (p < 0.05. Each color represents a term.)).
Animals 10 01271 g006
Animals 10 01271 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression levels of hormone-regulating genes and protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs with them. (a) Expression analysis of hormone-regulating genes, measured by FPKM (mean ± SEM, ** p < 0.05); All genes have significant expression differences between the two groups, of which GH, IGF-I, TSHB, and THRB were higher in Yunling group and THRA and INS were higher in Leiqiong group; FPKM, fragments per kilobase per million; (b) PPI network of DEGs with these hormone-regulating genes (the nodes in green are DEGs that did not appear in significantly different KEGG pathways (p < 0.05); the nodes in red are DEGs that also appeared in significantly different KEGG pathways (p < 0.05); the nodes in yellow are six hormones-regulating genes in this research).
Figure 7. Expression levels of hormone-regulating genes and protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs with them. (a) Expression analysis of hormone-regulating genes, measured by FPKM (mean ± SEM, ** p < 0.05); All genes have significant expression differences between the two groups, of which GH, IGF-I, TSHB, and THRB were higher in Yunling group and THRA and INS were higher in Leiqiong group; FPKM, fragments per kilobase per million; (b) PPI network of DEGs with these hormone-regulating genes (the nodes in green are DEGs that did not appear in significantly different KEGG pathways (p < 0.05); the nodes in red are DEGs that also appeared in significantly different KEGG pathways (p < 0.05); the nodes in yellow are six hormones-regulating genes in this research).
Animals 10 01271 g007
Table
Table 1. Summary of reads mapping to the bovine transcriptomes.
Table 1. Summary of reads mapping to the bovine transcriptomes.
SampleRaw ReadsClean ReadsQ30Total MappedMultiple MappedUniquely Mapped
Yunling_P157,697,72653,001,18890.00%89.74%3.86%85.89%
Yunling_P258,487,99453,293,32289.72%89.42%4.81%84.62%
Yunling_P360,623,11055,260,35089.82%89.43%4.20%85.23%
Leiqiong_P165,019,64059,273,08884.65%66.21%2.25%63.96%
Leiqiong_P263,584,75660,275,15493.51%79.65%4.09%75.56%
Leiqiong_P360,204,68656,734,66292.89%78.26%3.53%74.73%
Table
Table 2. Information on differentially expressed genes’ enrichment pathways.
Table 2. Information on differentially expressed genes’ enrichment pathways.
PathwayDescriptionGene Namep-Value
bta04724Glutamatergic synapseSLC38A1 → GNB4 → GRIN2A → SLC38A3 → GNAQ0.0011
bta04961Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorptionESR1 → GNAQ → KLK10.0050
bta04713Circadian entrainmentGNB4 → GRIN2A → GNAQ → GUCY1A20.0051
bta04919Thyroid hormone signaling pathwayESR1 → THRB → ITGAV → MED12L0.0091
bta04080Neuroactive ligand–receptor interactionNPY → GRIN2A → GAL → THRB → TRHR0.0127
bta04614Renin-angiotensin systemKLK1 → LNPEP0.0140
bta04728Dopaminergic synapseGNB4 → GRIN2A → GNAQ → CLOCK0.0140
bta00512Mucin type O-glycan biosynthesisGCNT4 → GALNT50.0196
bta04540Gap junctionMAP3K2 → GNAQ → GUCY1A20.0247
bta04727GABAergic synapseSLC38A1 → GNB4 → SLC38A30.0254
bta00250Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolismAGXT2 → GFPT10.0273
bta05017Spinocerebellar ataxiaGRIN2A → GNAQ → KCND30.0292
bta00564Glycerophospholipid metabolismLPGAT1 → ETNK1 → DGKH0.0358

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, X.; Arbab, A.A.I.; Zhang, Z.; Fan, Y.; Han, Z.; Gao, Q.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Z. Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of the Pituitary Gland between Cattle Breeds Differing in Growth: Yunling Cattle and Leiqiong Cattle. Animals 2020, 10, 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081271

AMA Style

Lu X, Arbab AAI, Zhang Z, Fan Y, Han Z, Gao Q, Sun Y, Yang Z. Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of the Pituitary Gland between Cattle Breeds Differing in Growth: Yunling Cattle and Leiqiong Cattle. Animals. 2020; 10(8):1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Xubin, Abdelaziz Adam Idriss Arbab, Zhipeng Zhang, Yongliang Fan, Ziyin Han, Qisong Gao, Yujia Sun, and Zhangping Yang. 2020. "Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of the Pituitary Gland between Cattle Breeds Differing in Growth: Yunling Cattle and Leiqiong Cattle" Animals 10, no. 8: 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081271

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop