Next Article in Journal
Oral Transmucosal Cannabidiol Oil Formulation as Part of a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen: Effects on Pain Relief and Quality of Life Improvement in Dogs Affected by Spontaneous Osteoarthritis
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization and Localization of Calb2 in Both the Testis and Ovary of the Japanese Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/ani10091504
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Probable Use of Genus amaranthus as Feed Material for Monogastric Animals

by
Tlou Grace Manyelo
1,2,
Nthabiseng Amenda Sebola
1,
Elsabe Janse van Rensburg
1 and
Monnye Mabelebele
1,*
1
Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida 1710, South Africa
2
Department of Agricultural Economics and Animal Production, University of Limpopo, Sovenga 0727, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(9), 1504; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091504
Submission received: 13 July 2020 / Revised: 3 August 2020 / Accepted: 5 August 2020 / Published: 26 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Nutrition)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In monogastric production, feeds account for about 50–70% of the total costs. Protein ingredients are one of the most expensive inputs even though they are not included in large quantities as compared to cereals. Monogastric animal industries are faced with a major problem of limited protein sources, moreover, the competition for plant materials is expected to further increase feed prices. Therefore, to tackle this problem, interventions are required to find alternative and cost-effective protein sources. One identified crop that meets these requirements is amaranth. Studies have shown the potential and contribution that amaranth has as an alternative ingredient in diets for monogastric animals. Therefore, the main purpose of this review is to provide a detailed understanding of the potential use of amaranth as feed for monogastric animals, and further indicate processing techniques are suitable to improve the utilization of grain amaranth and leaves. Amaranth has shown to improve performance and health status of monogastric animals because of its high nutritional value and availability of phenolic compounds. The conclusion of this review provides evidence from which stakeholders such as feed manufacturers and farmers can use to make more informed decisions in relation to the use of amaranth as an ingredient in monogastric animals.

Abstract

This review presents, discusses, and provides a comprehensive understanding of the potential use of amaranth as feed for monogastric animals. Amaranth is an ancient nutritious crop that has been cultivated for multiple purposes. In America, Asia, and Africa, the leaves of amaranth species are used as vegetables. The change in climatic conditions globally has resulted in shortages of rainfall, unpredictable weather, and lack of inputs such as fertilizer. This has led to scarcity of protein sources in the market and instability in prices which makes it necessary to consider alternative ingredients in poultry, pigs, fish, and rabbits feed formulation. Amaranth is rich in fiber, proteins, vitamins, minerals, and phenolic compounds which have some health benefits in animals and can be used to improve productivity. It also contains anti-nutritional factors which can be reduced by several processing methods. Moreover, its use in monogastric nutrition is useful because amaranth has shown to improve monogastric productivity without having any adverse effect on animals’ productivity. Thus, from this review, it can be concluded that amaranth leaves and grains can be used successfully in monogastric animals though different processing methods which might need to be employed in order to reduce anti-nutritional factors before use in animals.

1. Introduction

Amaranth originated from Latin America and is regarded as one of the ancient crops of the world. Its cultivation dates back as far as 6700 BC [1] and there around 60 species of genus amaranth of which most are cultivated as grains, leafy vegetables, ornamental plants, and weeds. Amaranth grains have been recorded to be important as feed and food in most countries such as Africa, India, China, Southeast Asia, Mexico, South and North America. Currently, in many tropical and temperate regions, amaranth is extensively grown as a green, leafy vegetable. Several authors have reported that the main species used as grains are: A. cruentus, A. caudatus, and A. hypochondriacus which are also known to be dual purpose varieties [2,3]. However, popular leafy species are A. hypochondriacus, A. tricolor, A. hybridus, and A. blitum as described in Table 1 [2,3,4,5,6]. Amaranth belongs to a group of plants in the same genus that are considered to be an annual to short-lived perennial and can be subdivided into grain and vegetables. Compared to soybean, amaranth is a drought resistant crop and has high tolerance to arid environments, although prolonged dry periods induce flowering and decrease leaf yields [7,8]. One of the most important traits that helps this crop to survive in extremely dry conditions is its ability to wilt temporarily and revive immediately after rainfall occurs. It has low capacity for water utilization, resulting in the crop not being able to withstand waterlogging [1]. In places such as Africa, India, and Nepal, amaranth grains and leaves have been established for food use. Recently, amaranth has gained a lot of interest because it is a highly nutritious food crop with excellent nutritional value in both grains and leaves [9]. In addition, it contains secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds which are well-known as antioxidants found in leaves and other aerial parts. Flavonols, hydroxycinnamic acids, and benzoic acids were identified in amaranth leaves, flowers, and stalks. These compounds play a role in defending against several diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, cataracts, atherosclerosis, retinopathy, arthritis, emphysema, and neurodegenerative diseases in human beings [10,11,12,13]. Several studies have been conducted in monogastric animals [14,15,16,17,18]. According to Longato et al. [15], 10% of amaranth leaves inclusion level in broiler diets has been found to be more suitable in facilitating better performance characteristics. Whilst [16] reported decreased final body weight when broiler chickens were fed diet with 50 and 100 g/kg of amaranth grain. However, no differences were observed in live weights of broiler chickens fed heat-treated and raw amaranth grains. [17]. Moreover, [18] reported that weight gain or live weight, health status of rabbits were not affected by 160 and 320 g/kg amaranth inclusion in rabbit diets. Whereas, [18] reported an increase in protein and fat contents and a decrease in meat moisture with increasing level (0, 16, and 32%) of amaranth in rabbit diets. In pigs, high in vitro dry matter (DM), crude protein, and energy digestibility were observed when Amaranthus hybridus plants and another 19 forage plants were fed to pigs [19]. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to (1) provide a detailed nutritional composition and the benefits to monogastric livestock, (2) summarize the phenolic properties found in amaranth grains and leaves, as well as their contributions to health or as anti-nutritive factors in monogastric animal feeding, and (3) demonstrate the potential use of amaranth grain as source of protein in monogastric diets.

2. Methodology

This review mainly focuses on the possible use of amaranth leaves and grains in diets for poultry, fish, pigs, and rabbits. This is because protein ingredients for monogastric animals under intensive systems are one of most costly inputs. Thus, strategies to mitigate these costs associated with feed ingredients have been the core objective of many researchers over the years. Given that this is a review, it was imperative to study most of the available literature in this area of the possible use of amaranth as a protein source. The articles used for the review were attained from peer-reviewed journals, books, and conference proceedings published between 2003 and 2020 in various databases. The length of years was chosen to be able to capture as wide range of articles as possible. The range of keywords and phrases used to search each database included: ‘amaranth feeding in animals’, ‘phenolic compounds in amaranth’, ‘nutritional composition of amaranth’, ‘processing methods of grain amaranth and leaves’. This was done analytically by focusing attention on a mixture of the words and phrases, therefore, authors searched in databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, AGORA, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. In the first step of elimination, the search process was conducted using the Google Scholar search engine, where 18,400 studies were listed when amaranth feeding was used as a keyword. The overwhelming majority of these references were evaluated as irrelevant from the point of view of our study. The search was narrowed down by adding in “monogastric”, whereby 675 references were obtained. Furthermore, we narrowed our search with time scale 2003–2020 and we obtained 544 and examined solely on basis of the title and keywords. After the elimination of 483 studies were excluded for differing reasons, 61 full-text remaining studies were assessed for eligibility. The remaining additional literature was included from the examination of the reference lists in the list of the literature extracted, academic resources (Master’s and Ph.D. dissertations), PLoS ONE, and the Directory of Open Access Journals.

3. Nutritive Value of Amaranth Leaves and Grains

Amaranth proves to be one of the best-suited crops to address specific health problems globally such as defending against several diseases, like cardiovascular disease, cataracts, atherosclerosis, retinopathy, arthritis, emphysema, and neurodegenerative diseases [14,15,16,17,18]. It contains relatively high nutritional value compared to other exotic vegetables such as asparagus, broccoli, celery, parsley, spinach, etc. Proximate composition of leaves and grains of amaranth vegetables are presented in Table 2. Amaranth grain contains total carbohydrate slightly lower than in common cereals [8,22,23,24,25]. Carbohydrate has the main component known as starch located in perisperm cells and constituting about 48–69% of grain dry matter [25]. Thus, amaranth grains have higher contents of carbohydrates than amaranth leaves. Monogastric carbohydrates serve as an energy provider essential to carrying out normal functions such as growth, movement, and metabolism. Generally, the grains seem to be more superior in nutritive value when compared to the leaves. Several authors reported that amaranth grains have more carbohydrates (51–77%) than amaranth leaves (1.3–10.1%) [26,27,28]. Variation of reported different carbohydrates levels in amaranth grains and leaves might be because reported amaranth was grown at different climatic conditions, whereas amylose content is very low, from 0.1 to 11.1%, in the grain. However, amaranth grains have shown slightly lower dietary fiber than in wheat but have similar dietary fiber like quinoa and common cereals [29,30,31]. According to Arendt and Zannini [23], dietary fiber in amaranth range between 9.8 and 14.5%, depending on the variety. Amaranth is also rich in sugars glucose, galactose, fructose, maltose, raffinose, stachyose, and inositol and is sucrose dominant [22,25].
Several authors reported higher contents of crude fiber in amaranth grains (1.8–6.5%) than in leaves (1.7–3.0) [22,28,32]. Crude fiber in the animal body is responsible for laxation, decrease in blood cholesterol and glucose, as well an increase in digestion [33]. Recently, crude fiber has gained special attention due to its functional value in improving monogastric animal’s gut health [34]. According to [26], improved gut health is important to enhance feed efficiency, promote growth performance, and maintain the overall health of monogastric animals.
Amaranth leaves have a higher moisture content than the grains [22,32,35]. These authors stated that high moisture content in vegetables is an indication of freshness, perishability, and low fats [22,36]. As stated by Venskutonis and Kraujalis [8], Peiretti [37], amaranth grains have shown to have a higher protein content than other cereal grains with more lysine than soybean. Its protein is also relatively abundant in the sulphur-containing amino acids, which are usually limited in the pulse crops [15,16]. In monogastric animals, protein is responsible for growth, reproduction, and repairing of worn out tissues. According to Abolaji et al. [28], Emebu and Anyika [35], vegetables, such as amaranth, have been shown to be rich in protein. Their leaves have lower nutrient composition than grains. Kelly et al. [22], Nicodemas [32] reported that amaranth grains have higher crude protein (13–19.85%) than amaranth leaves (3.37–4.42). This is because seeds play a major role in the growth, reproduction, repairing of plants torn out tissues, and nurturing plant growth, while leaves are responsible for biochemical energy and photosynthesis [26,27]. Unlike with other cereals, amaranth proteins consist of albumins (about 40%), glutenins (25–30%), and globulins (20%) and contain very small amounts of prolamins (2–3%) [23,28,29]. Amaranth prolamins are richer in glutamic acid and essential amino acids than albumins and globulins. This makes amaranth a good protein source closer to the composition of animal proteins [23,29,31].
Crude fats are not really noted to contribute more to the fat supply in animal feeds. However, amaranth grains have a higher fat content (5.7–16.7%) than amaranth leaves (1.79–2.15%). Variation in this variation might be that grains store fats reserve which help in seedling germination. Fats help produce body heat or energy, functioning of the brain, and mobilization and carry fat-soluble vitamins in animal body. Moreover, animal body needs essential fatty acids to perform and enhance immunity [26].
Amaranth grains are richer in ash content than leaves, and according to Abolaji et al. [28], ash content indicates the mineral content present in the feeds, as well high molecular weights. Hence, amaranth grains have a higher ash content than the leaves. However, according to Okpara et al. [38], amaranth leaves contain adequate minerals, such as calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin C in contrast to other vegetable leaves. In addition, Neudeck et al. [39] reported high quantities of both micro and macro nutrients in the seeds and leaves which are associated with preventing health problems such as anemia, lameness, stiff legs, osteoporosis, or rickets, etc. The abundant and availability of nutrients present in both leaves and grains of amaranth as indicated above should put this crop in the front seat of probable alternative sources of protein. Not only is this crop easily accessible but also affordable, which makes it suitable to address high feed costs associated with conventional feed ingredients.
Table
Table 2. Comparative proximate analysis (%) of Amaranthus leaves and grains.
Table 2. Comparative proximate analysis (%) of Amaranthus leaves and grains.
NutrientLeavesGrainsReferences
Moisture 6.49[26]
6–9[28]
72.29 [40]
79.29 [41]
86.5239.643[27]
Crude protein 16.83[8]
19.85[26]
13–18[28]
4.37 [38]
4.42014.753[29]
3.7-[40]
Crude fat 10.6–16.7[40]
5.77[8]
1.79 [26]
6–8[28]
2.15 [40]
1.4708.473[27]
Crude fiber 2.5[8]
1.81[26]
4–14[28]
3.01 [38]
1.7576.557[27]
Ash 2.90[8]
2.25[26]
3–4[28]
1.52 [41]
2.7372.373[27]
Carbohydrates1.33751.640[27]
10.19 [41]
63[28]
77[26]

4. Phenolic Compounds Present in Amaranth Species

Polyphenols are secondary metabolites that occur naturally in cereals, fruits, and vegetables such as amaranth [41]. These compounds vary among Amaranthus species and genotypes and they are normally present in various part of plants; seeds, leaves, stalks, and flowers [42,43]. Li et al. [44] found that seeds have higher total phenolic compounds than leaves in different three Amaranthus species (A. hypochondriacus, A. caudatus, and A. cruentus). Whereas, Karamać et al. [43] found higher total phenol in the early vegetative stage than in the flower and seeds. Studies have shown that the amaranth crop has natural antioxidant phytochemicals that help in defending against cardiovascular diseases [11,45,46]. Antioxidants found in amaranth have been reported to be more powerful than those found in Vitamin C, E, and beta carotene. According to Jimenez-Aguilar and Grusak [46], antioxidant activity includes suppression of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as peroxides and superoxide formation, by inhibiting enzymes and destroying free radicals.
Several studies have reported that amaranth contains phenols compounds such as rutin and quercetin [3,42,43,47]. According to Kalinova and Dadakova [48], A. tricolor flowers contained lower amounts of rutin than leaves. Rutin and quercetin have shown to be important antioxidants which inhibit the oxidation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [48]. High phenolic acids in leaves, flowers, stalks, and seeds of A. caudatus contain high phenolic compounds [44,49]. Moreover, stems of A. spinosus were reported to contained a lot of Coumaroylquinic acids [50]. Whereas, Stintzing et al. [51] reported caffeic acid and vainillic acid as the principal antioxidant compound found in leaves extract of A. caudatus. Moreover, high contents of gallic acids was reported in the seeds and sprouts of A. cruentus by [8]. However, free phenolic acids, such as ferulic, p-coumaric, p-hydroxybenzoic, vanillic, sinapic, gallic, and protocatechuic acids, as well as betacyanins, were not detected by [44] in their study of antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus) during plant growth. Thus, amaranth phenolic compounds content might depend on amaranth species and their various plant parts (seeds, leaves, flowers, stalks, stems, etc.). The antioxidant properties of polyphenolic compounds present in amaranth may be directly used in animal nutrition. They can be applied as preservatives in compound feeding stuffs to protect animals against the negative consequences of oxidation of feed components, feeds with a high content of unsaturated fat.

5. Anti-Nutritional Factors Present in Amaranth

Ref. [52] defined anti-nutritional factors (ANF) as “those substances generated in natural food stuffs by different mechanisms (e.g., inactivation of some nutrients, diminution of digestive process, or metabolic utilization of feed) which exert effect contrary to optimum nutrition”. Amaranth contains secondary metabolites, such as tannins, oxalates, phytates, trypsin inhibitors, saponins, and nitrates (Table 3). These anti-nutritional factors are biologically active chemical compounds which depress the availability of nutrients to the animal body and interfere with metabolic processes [8,14,52]. Tannins are condensed bitter plant polyphenolic compounds that are present in high amounts in the seed coats of most legumes, and certain fruits and vegetables, including the amaranth [53]. These compounds are distributed throughout the plant kingdom and are common in both gymnosperms and angiosperms. Tannins have traditionally been considered anti-nutritional, but it is now known that their beneficial or anti-nutritional characteristics depend on their chemical structure and dosage. The most abundant tannins are condensed tannins [54] and these can inhibit digestion by binding to plant proteins, making them more challenging to digest [55]. They also interfere with protein absorption and digestive enzymes. Oxalates are known to be anti-nutrients present in high amounts in amaranth vegetables. These secondary metabolites form insoluble calcium oxalate with calcium, and this results in preventing the absorption and utilization of calcium by the body of an animal, hence causing diseases such as rickets and osteomalacia [56]. As stated by Fasuyi et al. [14], phytic acid, also known as phytate when in the salt form in many plant tissues, is the storage form of phosphate which binds iron, zinc, calcium, and magnesium. This phytic acid has been shown to result in insoluble complexes that are normally not easy to be absorbed by a chicken’s gastrointestinal tract. During the germination stage of grains, such as amaranth, the phytate decreases due to enzymatic breakdown of phytate which improves iron availability. Fasuyi et al. [14] reported that phytate content of between 1 and 6% in animal diets decreases the bioavailability of mineral elements, especially in monogastric animals, over a long period. Amaranth is known to be one of the crops that accumulate high number of nitrates. Nitrates in amaranth are a concern most of the time because they may be chemically changed in the digestive tract of the animal and become poisonous. This has been shown to occur mostly when photosynthesis is slowed down by factors, such as herbicides, drought, or frost, and with a high accumulation of nitrogen fertilizer in the soil. This shows that as much as amaranth can contain useful nutrients and phenolic compounds which have been proven to improve performance and health status, it cannot be readily used without undergoing several processing methods to reduce these anti nutrients. Thus, several researchers have tested the different methods suitable for both grains and leaves for use in monogastric diets. What should be key when selecting these methods is their cost-effectiveness, or else it can defeat the purpose of using amaranth as a cheap and readily available source of protein in monogastric feed formulations.

6. Processing Methods Used to Reduce Anti-Nutritional Factors (ANF’s)

As already indicated and explained, the presence of the anti-nutritional factors is one of the major problems with alternative feed sources, such as the amaranth crop, which mostly require chemical, biological, or physical treatment before they can be effectively included in monogastric diets. There are several processing methods that are often applied to reduce anti-nutritional factors in vegetables like the amaranth. Some of these processing methods are practised domestically, and others are performed on a larger scale in the industry [61]. To date, many researchers have been working on how anti-nutritional factors can be reduced in animal diets. Cooking, roasting, extrusion, etc., have shown to be one of the mechanical and physical methods that can be used to reduced anti-nutritional factors. The use of alkali treatment, ammonia, urea, polyethylene glycol, and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) have been used as a chemical treatment, and enzyme supplementation has been used as biological methods [62].

6.1. Cooking

Cooking is one of the ancient methods that has been used to reduce anti-nutritional factors in animal diets. Crops, such as amaranth, need to be cooked or heat-treated before they can be given to animals because of its high content of anti-nutritional factors. Studies have shown that about 20% or more of raw amaranth cannot be included in broiler diets. However, 40% of amaranth can be included in broiler and layers diets if cooked and will have no adverse effect on production performance [68]. According to Mamiro et al. [69], cooking is beneficial to the nutritional value of feed stuffs because it does not reduce or affect availability of minerals and proteins. Several authors reported that cooking improves nutritional values of various vegetables, and results in a high reduction of phytates and oxalates in green leafy vegetables, such as amaranth [70]. However, other authors reported that phytic acid content is not affected by cooking [71,72]. In studies where anti-nutritional factors were affected by the cooking method, authors stated that the effects might be due to heat degradation, a change in chemical reactivity, and the formation of insoluble complexes [70,72,73].

6.2. Roasting

Roasting is one of the heat methods from the past that has been used to reduce anti-nutritional factors. This method is done by bringing feedstuffs such as amaranth in contact with direct flame. The process of roasting has shown good results when done at a temperature of 180 °C. After roasting, mechanical cooling is recommended to bring down the temperature of the feedstuff. According to Chemeda and Bussa [74], the roasting method has proven to decrease the trypsin inhibitor activity, tannins, and phytates in amaranth grains. Moreover, roasting has shown to decrease viscosity, the ability to bind and retain water, and the gelling ability of grains. Agume et al. [75] reported that the decrease in all these properties is significantly important when amaranth grains are roasted [75]. The good thing about this method is that it causes little decrease in protein and carbohydrate content of feedstuffs and provides a good number of vitamins and minerals, while reducing the largest part of tannin, phytate, and trypsin inhibitor activity [76].

6.3. Popping

Popping is one of easiest and cheapest methods to reduce anti-nutritional factors, and is normally used for household food. This method is like roasting except that feedstuffs do not come into direct contact with flame but are heated only with hot air. For a successful popping of feedstuff to happen, a temperature between 160–193 °C is recommended, thereafter it is then cooled down gradually using mechanical cooling, as done in roasting. Several authors reported that popping reduces anti-nutritional factors, such as phytic acids in amaranth grains but results in a decrease in protein content which might be because some amino acids are very sensitive to heat [76,77,78]. However, the decrease in phytic acid content during the popping method results in more bioavailability of protein and minerals, and an increased level of carbohydrates [78,79]. According to Muyonga et al. [80], higher coefficients of nutrient digestibility (crude protein, ether extract, Neutral Detergent Fibre (NDF), Acid Detergent Fibre (ADF), and gross energy) were observed when amaranth grains were heat treated using popping method, whereas [81] reported a decrease protein digestibility in broiler chickens fed popped amaranth grains. Juzl et al. [82] reported that better meat sensory indicators (taste, tenderness, texture, and color) in cockrels and pullets fed diets supplemented with 10% of popped amaranth grains.

6.4. Extrusion

Extrusion is a heat processing method that requires a high temperature for a short period of time. Furthermore, it is done by a combination of temperature, moisture, pressure, and mechanical shear. According to Nooshin et al. [83], this method involves putting feedstuffs in plastic with water to cook. Authors reported that extrusion has resulted in a decrease in tannins and polyphenols while improving in vitro protein digestibility [84]. According to Kumar et al. [85], an improvement in in vitro protein digestibility is a result of the degradation in protein complexes within the extruded samples and the denaturation of protein due to heat and shearing. Popiela et al. [86] reported that fatty acids in the egg yolk of layers was not affected by supplementation of extruded amaranth grains. Furthermore, authors reported an increase in final body weight in layers fed extruded amaranth grains [86]. Jakubowska et al. [87] found no effects in breast meat of quail supplemented with extruded grains for 14 weeks. In pigs, Sokňl et al. [88] reported that extruded amaranth grains were found to have no effect on meat quality.

6.5. Alkali Treatment

Alkaline treatment is an ancient chemical treatment of anti-nutritional factors in animal diets. It can be done by simply adding urea, NaOH, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and polyethylene glycol (PEG) to reduce anti-nuttiness in animal feeds [89]. Currently, PVP and PEG are more promising chemical strategies in reducing anti-nutrients in animal feeds [90]. PEG is an inactive and unabsorbed chemical that contains oxygen atoms which form hydrogen bonds with phenolic groups present in tannins and destroy them and for stable complex which prevents tannins to bind proteins [60]. Several studies reported that polyethylene glycol can prevent the formation of tannin–protein complexes and transfer pre-formed tannin–protein complexes [60,91]. This has shown to reduce tannins activity and to increase the availability of nutrients, such as proteins, and to reduce microbial inhibition. [90,92] stated that increased availability of nutrients resulted in improved animal performance and neutralized the negative effects of tannins in crops. Alkali treatment has been shown to have beneficial effects in animals depending on the amount of anti-nutrients present in the diets [93,94]. Thus, no studies have been yet reported on the effects on monogastric animal performance fed chemically treated amaranth.

6.6. Enzyme Supplementation

Enzyme supplementation is an expensive biological treatment and has shown to outshine processing methods, such as cooking or heating [25,94,95], although it is expensive. Several studies have shown that enzyme supplementation has been effective in vegetable-based poultry diets to reduce tannins [14,96,97]. Enzymes, such as cellulose, glucanase, and xylanase, have been used to reduce anti-nutrients in animal diets because most of alternative feed sources are rich in fiber, protein, vitamins, and minerals. Choct [96] reported that amaranth leaf included in broiler diets has no deleterious effect when supplemented with Roxazyme G2 enzyme containing cellulase, glucanase, and xylanase. Furthermore, these authors reported that up to 25% of sun-dried A. cruentus leaf meal supplemented with an enzyme (cellulase, glucanase, and xylanase) can result in better performance of broiler chickens. According to Fasuyi and Akindahunsi [97], Bhardwaj et al. [98], cellulase enzyme is responsible for breaking down β-1,4-glucoside linkages of cellulose chain and converting them into beta-glucose, whereas xylanase enzyme breakdown β-1,4-glycoside linkage of xylan into xylose and glucanase enzyme breakdown a glucan glucose sub-units. Increased nutrient digestibility, a decrease in the incidence of wet litter, and the excretion of nitrogen and phosphorus in broiler chickens have been reported as important benefits of exogenous enzyme supplementation [99,100,101]. Thus, enzyme supplementation can be used in animal diets to improve utilization of available and alternative feed sources with anti-nutritional factors.
Usually several factors are taken into consideration when selecting an appropriate processing method for grain crops. A challenge with most of the non-conventional feed ingredients is the presence of heat labile factors which has led to being classified as growth inhibitory anti-nutritional factors that limit their acceptability and utilization by monogastric animals [86,87,88]. Therefore, since crops like amaranth are termed “cheap” in the quest of reducing feed costs, perhaps more research should be invested in processing techniques which are cost-effective and easy to use.

7. The Use of Amaranth Leaves and Grains in Monogastric Nutrition

Amaranth crops are normally grown for leaf and grain production in most parts of the world [68]. Amaranth leaves and grains are a potential source of protein and methionine for monogastric animals. Monogastric nutrition involves providing balance of nutrients that best meets the animals’ needs for growth, maintenance, and egg production. This crop gained global attention due to its availability, economic feasibility, traits of being hardy in harsh environments, and its excellent nutrient composition [17,102]. The inclusion of amaranth, both leaves and grains, in animal feed has shown to be a promising alternative source.

7.1. Amaranth Leaves

The use of amaranth leaves has shown improvement in monogastric feed formulations as unconventional sources of energy and protein (Table 4). According to Fasuyi et al. [14], Amaranthus cruentus leaf meal could be added to broiler finisher diets as a potential protein source. Authors reported that at least 10% of A. cruentus leaf meal can be included in broiler finisher diets and results in better performance. Moreover, 10% of amaranth in layers has shown to reduce the cholesterol content of eggs and improve egg weight [15], while Fasuyi and Akindahunsi [97] reported that up to 25% of sun-dried A. cruentus leaf meal supplemented with an enzyme (cellulase, glucanase, and xylanase) can result in better performance of broiler chickens. In fish nutrition, Ngugi [103], in their study of characterization of the nutritional quality of amaranth leaf as a protein source to replace fish meal in Nile tilapia, reported a possible replacement of fishmeal with up to 80% amaranth leaves. Authors reported that an 80% replacement of fish meal with amaranth meal had no effect on the performance of tilapia fish. However, Adewolu and Adamson [12], Punita and Chaturvedi [104], Phonekhampheng [105], observed an improved growth rate of fish fed up to 5% amaranth leaves. Adeniji et al. [106] reported a reduced growth rate of fish at all inclusion levels of up to 75%. Authors stated that the reduced growth rate might be due to the highest level of amaranth with high content of anti-nutritional factors and imbalanced amino acids (Adeniji et al. [106]).

7.2. Amaranth Grains

Amaranth grain has the potential to partially replace maize and soybean meal in poultry diets (Table 5) [68]. The grain has an adequate amino acids content which resulted in the grains having about twice the amount of protein as cereal grains. They also have a similar energy content as other cereals, thus, they can be used as a feed ingredient for broilers. Authors recommended that amaranth grains can only be included as a raw material in chicken finisher diets [9]. However, other authors have normalized treating grains before consumption by chickens. In fact, heat treatment, such as autoclaving, extrusion, cooking, or popping of amaranth grains, gave positive results compared to results from feeding maize/soybean rations [110]. Písaříková et al. [81] used popped amaranth grains which resulted in lower in vitro digestibility of protein than with raw amaranth. This was due to the high temperatures that resulted in a decreased biological value of protein. However, Fasuyi and Akindahunsi [97] stated that heat treatment of amaranth grains resulted in lower digestibility than raw amaranth in broilers. According to Ravindran et al. [111], amaranth grains can be incorporated at levels of up to 400 g per kg without adverse effects as a potential useful energy supplement for broiler diets. Popiela et al. [86] indicated that a greater egg production was observed when layers were fed with amaranth grains. Currently, in pig nutrition, there is limited literature on the use of amaranth grains. The use of amaranth in pig nutrition has shown positive results in growth performance. Several authors reported an increase in digestibility when amaranth is added to pig diets [18,108]. However, 2.5 and 10% of Amaranthus cruentus and grass meal can be used to increase the production and survival of weaner pigs [108]. Niewiadomski et al. [112], in their study to demonstrate the usefulness of amaranth as a component of commercial feeds for rainbow trout, observed an improved growth rate of trout fish when 5% of soybean meal was replaced with amaranth meal. Amaranthus dubius is proposed as a possible alternative source of fiber and protein in rabbit feeding for subtropical and tropical regions [17]. Authors reported that there was no adverse effect observed in weight gain and health status of rabbits fed a diet with A. dubius. However, feed intake, feed conversion, and digestibility were improved in diets containing or supplemented with A. dubius [17]. Molina et al. [17] reported an increase in protein and fat contents, with a decrease in moisture content of rabbit meat when A. dubius was included in rabbit diets. Nicodemas [32] reported that treated amaranth grain inclusion in rabbit diets can revert an associated endothelial dysfunction, lower tissue and blood cholesterol oxidation in rabbits.

7.3. Effect of Amaranth Grain and Leaves on Health Parameters of Monogastric Animals

Amaranth has antioxidants which makes a candidate of potentially improving health status of monogastric animal. The health properties of diet supplements are proved by, among other things, the values of hematological and biochemical blood indices. Several authors reported the effect of amaranth inclusion on health parameters of monogastric animals. Sokňl et al. [88] reported that amaranth grains supplemented in pig diets resulted in blood glucose reduction. According to Fasuyi [117], broiler chickens fed finisher diet supplemented with amaranth leaves showed no predisposition to acute general infection, malignant tumor, malformation, or diseased condition even at the highest amaranth inclusion level of 20%. Moreover, Rouckova et al. [16], Orczewska-Dudek et al. [113], reported that blood plasma glucose level of broiler chickens fed amaranth grains up to 8% were not affected. However, Czerwińska et al. [118] observed an increase in plasma lipid profile of rats fed amaranth grains. Blood plasma triglyceride level was shown to decrease by inclusion of amaranth in Japanese quails [119]. The reduction of blood plasma triglyceride was closely dependent on the content of bioactive substances, including antioxidants in amaranth seeds [119]. It can be assumed that the addition of amaranth seeds can have health benefits in monogastric animals, although more research is recommended in this area.

8. Conclusions

This review describes the use of amaranth grain and leaves as an alternative feed source in monogastric animals. Various researchers found that amaranth can partially or completely replace soybean or fishmeal in the formulation of feed for poultry, fish, pigs, and rabbits. Reasons highlighted by most researchers were that amaranth has less competition with soybean for human consumption and can grow in harsh weather conditions where soybean does not do well. Moreover, amaranth contains phenolic compounds which depend on species and various plant parts (seeds, leaves, flowers, stalks, stems, etc.) which are beneficial to human and animal health alike. It is recommended that grains be subjected to different processing methods to reduce anti-nutritional factors before use in monogastric animals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., writing—original draft preparation, T.G.M., review and editing, N.A.S., E.J.v.R. and M.M., visualization, N.A.S., and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the National Research Foundation (grant number 118245) and the University of South Africa for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF). Annual Report; Resource Centre, Directorate Agricultural Information Services: Pretoria, South Africa, 2017.
  2. St Clair, K. The Secret Lives of Colour; John Murray: London, UK, 2016; p. 131. ISBN 9781473630819. OCLC: 936144129. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jimoh, M.O.; Afolayan, A.J.; Lewu, F.B. Therapeutic uses of Amaranthus caudatus L. Trop. Biomed. 2019, 36, 1038–1053. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tatiya, A.U.; Surana, S.J.; Khope, S.D.; Gokhale, S.B.; Sutar, M.P. Phytochemical investigation and immunomodulatory activity of Amaranthus spinosus linn. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. 2007, 44, 337–341. [Google Scholar]
  5. Apolot, M.G.; Acham, H.; Ssozi, J.; Namutebi, A.; Masanza, M.; Kizito, E.; Deborah, R. Changes in sensory and quality characteristics of S. aethiopicum (L) and A. lividus (L) leafy vegetables along the supply chain. Am. J. Food Technol. 2018, 6, 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  6. Van Volkenburg, H.; Frédérique, C.G.; Liette, V. Impacts of Smooth Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) on Cover Crops in Southern Ontario. Agron. Res. 2020, 10, 529–542. [Google Scholar]
  7. Alemayehu, F.; Reta, M.A.; Bendevis, S.E.J. The potential for utilizing the seed crop amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in East Africa as an alternative crop to support food security and climate change mitigation. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2015, 201, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Venskutonis, P.R.; Kraujalis, P. Nutritional components of amaranth seeds and vegetables: A review on composition, properties, and uses. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 381–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Písaříková, B.; Zralý, Z.; Kračmar, S.; Trčková, M.; Herzig, I. The use of amaranth (genus Amaranthus L.) in the diets for broiler chickens. Vet. Med. 2006, 51, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Abolaji, G.T.; Olooto, F.M.; Ogundele, D.T.; Williams, F.E. Nutritional characterization of grain amaranth grown in Nigeria for food security and healthy living. Agrosearch 2016, 17, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sarker, U.; Oba, S. Nutraceuticals, antioxidant pigments, and phytochemicals in the leaves of Amaranthus spinosus and Amaranthus viridis weedy species. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  12. Adewolu, M.A.; Adamson, A.A. Amaranthus spinosus leaf meal as potential dietary protein source in the practical diets for Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Fingerlings. In. J. Zool. Res. 2011, 7, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kraujalis, P.; Venskutonis, P.R. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of squalene and tocopherols from amaranth and assessment of extracts antioxidant activity. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 80, 78085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fasuyi, A.O.; Dairo, F.A.S.; Adeniji, A.O. Protein supplementary quality of tropical vegetable (Amaranthus cruentus) leaf meal in broiler starter diets: Bio-nutritional evaluation. Int. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 2, 976–986. [Google Scholar]
  15. Longato, E.; Meineri, G.; Peiretti, P.G. The effect of Amaranthus caudatus supplementation to diets containing linseed oil on oxidative status, blood serum metabolites, growth performance and meat quality characteristics in broilers. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2017, 35, 71–86. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rouckova, J.; Trackova, M.; Herzig, I. The use of amaranth grain in diets for broiler chickens and its effect on performance and selected biochemical indicators. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 12, 532–541. [Google Scholar]
  17. Molina, E.; González-Redondo, P.; Moreno-Rojas, R.; Montero-Quintero, K.; Sánchez-Urdaneta, A. Effect of the inclusion of Amaranthus dubius in diets on carcass characteristics and meat quality of fattening rabbits. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2018, 46, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kambashi, B.; Picron, P.; Boudry, C.; Thewis, A.; Kiatoko, H.; Bindelle, J. Nutritive value of tropical forage plants fed to pigs in the Western provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 191, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jimoh, M.O.; Afolayan, A.J.; Lewu, F.B. Suitability of Amaranthus species for alleviating human dietary deficiencies. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 115, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neelesh, K.M.; Pratibha, A. Amaranthus grain nutritional benefits: A review. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 2258–2262. [Google Scholar]
  21. Soriano-García, M.; Arias-Olguín, I.I.; Montes, J.P.C. Nutritional functional value and therapeutic utilization of Amaranth. J Anal. Pharm. Res. 2018, 7, 596–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kelly, G.; Brien, O.; Martin, L. Amaranth Grain and Vegetable Types. ECHO Tech. Notes. North Fort Myers, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 1–9. Available online: https://www.el-pan-alegre.org/Amaranth_Grain-and-Vegetable_Types.pdf (accessed on 13 May 2020).
  23. Arendt, E.; Zannini, E. Cereal Grains for the Food and Beverage Industries; Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Caselato-Sousa, V.M.; Amaya-Farfan, J. Concise Reviews in Food Science State of Knowledge on Amaranth Grain: A Comprehensive Review. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Becker, R.; Wheeler, E.L.; Lorenz, K.; Stafford, A.E.; Grosjean, O.K.; Betschart, A.A.; Saunders, R.M. A Compositional Study of Amaranth Grain. J. Food Sci. 1981, 46, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Edelman, M.; Colt, M. Nutrient Value of Leaf vs. Seed. Front. Chem. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Abugre, C. Assessment of Some Traditional Leafy Vegetables of Upper East Region and Influence of Stage of Harvest and Drying Method on Nutrients Content of Spider Flower. Master’s Thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 2011, unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  28. Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N.; Baharlouei, A.; Watson, D.G.; Lightfoot, D.A. Phytochemicals: Extraction, isolation, and identification of bioactive compounds from plant extracts. Plants 2017, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Alvarez-Jubete, L.; Arendt, E.K.; Gallagher, E. Nutritive value of pseudocereals and their increasing use as functional gluten-free ingredients. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2010, 21, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alvarez-Jubete, L.; Arendt, E.K.; Gallagher, E. Nutritive value and chemical composition of pseudocereals as gluten-free ingredients. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 6, 240–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Andini, R.; Yoshida, S.; Ohsawa, R. Variation in Protein Content and Amino Acids in the Leaves of Grain, Vegetable and Weedy Types of Amaranths. Agronomy 2013, 3, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nicodemas, D. Nutrient and Anti-Nutrient Contents of Selected Varieties of Grain and Leafy Amaranths in Tanzania. Master’s Thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  33. Edoardo, C. The behavior of dietary fiber in the gastrointestinal tract determines its physiological effect. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3543–3564. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jha, R.; Berrocoso, J.D. Dietary fiber utilization and its effects on physiological functions and gut health of swine. Animal 2015, 9, 1441–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Emebu, P.K.; Anyika, J.U. Proximate and Mineral Composition of Kale (Brassica oleracea) Grown in Delta State, Nigeria. Pak. J. Nutr. 2011, 10, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Peiretti, P.G.; Meineri, G.; Longato, E.; Tassone, S. Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and fatty acid profile of Amaranthus caudatus herbage during its growth cycle. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol. 2018, 18, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Peiretti, P.G. Amaranth in animal nutrition: A review. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2018, 30, 88. [Google Scholar]
  38. Okpara, S.U.; Onyegbule, C.N.; Nwanguma, E.I.; Ibekwe, H.N.; Ngbede, S.O.; Uwalaka, A. Effect of different fertilizer forms on the growth and yield of amaranths (Amaranthus cruentus) in Okwigwe, Southeastern Nigeria. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Horticultural Society of Nigeria (HORTSON), Abuja, Nigeria, 22–26 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
  39. Neudeck, L.; Avelino, L.; Bareetseng, P.; Ngwenya, B.N.; Demel, T.; Motsholapheko, M.R. The contribution of edible wild plants to food security, dietary, diversity and income of households in Shorobe village, Northern Botswana. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2012, 10, 449–462. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chakrabarty, T.; Sarker, U.; Hasan, M.; Rahman, M.M. Variability in mineral compositions, yield, and yield contributing traits of stem amaranth (Amaranthus lividus). Genetika 2018, 50, 995–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fasuyi, A.O. Nutritional potentials of some tropical vegetable meals. Chemical characterization and functional properties. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  42. Peiretti, P.G.; Meineri, G.; Gai, F.; Longato, E.; Amarowicz, R. Antioxidative activity and phenolic compounds of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) seeds and amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus) grain extracts. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 2178–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Karamać, M.; Gai, F.; Longato, E.; Meineri, G.; Janiak, M.A.; Amarowicz, R.; Peiretti, P.G. Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus) during plant growth. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Li, H.; Deng, Z.; Liu, R.; Zhu, H.; Draves, J.; Marcone, M.; Sun, Y.; Tsao, R. Characterization of phenolics, betacyanins and antioxidant activities of the seed, leaf, sprout, flower and stalk extracts of three Amaranthus species. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 37, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Steffensen, S.K.; Åsmund, R.; Mortensen, A.G.; Laursen, B.; de Troiani, R.M.; Noellemeyer, E.J.; Janovska, D.; Dusek, K.; Délano-Frier, J.; Taberner, A.; et al. Variations in the polyphenol content of seeds of field grown Amaranthus genotypes. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jimenez-Aguilar, D.M.; Grusak, M.A. Minerals, vitamin C, phenolic, flavonoids and antioxidant activity of Amaranthus leafy vegetables. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 58, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sarker, U.; Oba, S. Protein, dietary fiber, minerals, antioxidant pigments and phytochemicals, and antioxidant activity in selected red morph Amaranthus leafy vegetable. PLoS ONE 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kalinova, J.; Dadakova, E. Rutin and total quercetin content in amaranth (Amaranthus spp.). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2009, 64, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Paucar-Menacho, M.; Dueñas, M.; Peñas, E.; Frias, J.; Martínez-Villaluenga, C. Effect of dry heat puffing on nutritional composition, fatty acid, amino acid and phenolic profiles of pseudocereals grains. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2018, 68, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stintzing, F.C.; Kammerer, D.; Schieber, A.; Adama, H.; Nacoulma, O.G.; Carle, R. Betacyanins and phenolic compounds from Amaranthus spinosus L. and Boerhavia erecta L. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 2004, 59, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Conforti, F.; Statti, G.; Loizzo, M.R.; Sacchetti, G.; Poli, F.; Menichini, F. In vitro antioxidant effect and inhibition of α-amylase of two varieties of Amaranthus caudatus seeds. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 28, 1098–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Soetan, K.O.; Oyewole, O.E. The need for adequate processing to reduce the anti-nutritional factors in plants used as human foods an animal feeds: A review. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2009, 3, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  53. Makkar, H.P.S. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Rumin. Res. 2003, 49, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hassanpour, S.; Naser, M.; Behrad, E.; Mehmandar, F.B. Plants and secondary metabolites (Tannins): A Review. Int. J. For. Soil Eros. 2011, 1, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mapiye, C.; Chimonyo, M.; Dzama, K.; Hugo, A.; Strydom, P.E.; Muchenje, V. Fatty acid composition of beef from Nguni steers supplemented with Acacia karroo leaf-meal. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011, 24, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Agbaire, P.O. Levels of anti-nutritional factors in some common leafy edible vegetables of southern Nigeria. Afr. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 3, 99–101. [Google Scholar]
  57. Muramoto, K. Lectins as bioactive proteins in foods and feeds. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2017, 23, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kaushik, G.; Singhal, P.; Chaturvedi, S. Food processing for increasing consumption: The case of legumes. In Food Processing for Increased Quality and Consumption; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; Volume 18, pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  59. Samtiya, M.; Aluko, R.E.; Dhewa, T. Plant food anti-nutritional factors and their reduction strategies: An overview. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2020, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Joye, I. Protein digestibility of cereal products. Foods 2019, 8, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Nørgaard, J.V.; Malla, N.; Dionisio, G.; Madsen, C.K.; Pettersson, D.; Lærke, H.N. Exogenous xylanase or protease for pigs fed barley cultivars with high or low enzyme inhibitors. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2019, 248, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Salas, C.E.; Dittz, D.; Torres, M.J. Plant proteolytic enzymes: Their role as natural pharmacophores. In Biotechnological Applications of Plant Proteolytic Enzymes; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 107–127. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ercan, P.; El, S.N. Inhibitory effects of chickpea and Tribulus terrestris on lipase, α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Food Chem. 2016, 205, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Addisu, S.; Assefa, A. Role of plants containing saponins on livestock production, a review. Adv. Biol. Res. 2016, 10, 309–314. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kregiel, D.; Berlowska, J.; Witonska, I.; Antolak, H.; Proestos, C.; Babic, M. Saponin-based, biological-active surfactants from plants. In Application and Characterization of Surfactants; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; pp. 183–205. [Google Scholar]
  66. Nyonje, A.W. Nutrients, Anti-Nutrients and Phytochemical Evaluation of Ten Vegetable Amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) Varieties at Two Stages of Growth. Master’s Thesis, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Central Kenya, Kenya, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sinha, K.; Khare, V. Review on: Anti-nutritional factors in vegetable crops. J. Pharm. Innov. 2017, 6, 353–358. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jacob, J. Including Amaranth in Organic Poultry Diets. eOrganic the Organic Agriculture Community of eXtension. University of Kentucky. 2013. Available online: https://eorganic.org/node/8100 (accessed on 15 May 2020).
  69. Mamiro, P.S.; Mwanri, A.W.; Mongi, R.J.; Chivaghula, T.J.; Nyagaya, M.; Ntwenya, J. Effect of cooking on tannin and phytate content in different bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties grown in Tanzania. Afr. J. Biotech. 2017, 16, 1186–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ilelaboye, N.O.A.; Amoo, I.A.; Pikuda, O.O. Effect of cooking methods on mineral and anti-nutrient composition of some green leafy vegetables. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2013, 5, 254–260. [Google Scholar]
  71. Alonso, R.; Aguirre, A.; Marzo, F. Effects of extrusion and traditional processing methods on anti-nutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch in faba and kidney beans. Food Chem. 2000, 68, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, G.; Johnson, S.K.; Bornman, J.F.; Bennett, S.J.; Singh, V.; Simic, A.; Fang, Z. Effects of Genotype and Growth Temperature on the Contents of Tannin, Phytate and In Vitro Iron Availability of Sorghum Grains. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Yagoub, A.A.; Mohamed, E.B.; Ahmed, A.H.R.; El Tinay, A.H. Study on fururndu, a Traditional Sudanese fermented roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seed: Effect on in vitro protein digestibility, chemical composition and functional properties of the total proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6143–6150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chemeda, A.S.; Bussa, N.F. Effect of Processing Methods on Nutritional and Anti-nutritional Value of Amaranth Grain; and Potential Future Application of Amaranth Grain in Injera Making. Int. J. Fermented Food. 2018, 7, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Agume, A.S.; Njintang, N.Y.; Mbofung, C.M. Effect of Soaking and Roasting on the Physicochemical and Pasting Properties of Soybean Flour. Foods 2017, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  76. Makinde, F.M.; Oladunni, S.S. Effects of processing treatments on nutritional quality of raw almond (Terminalia catappa Linn.) kernels. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 2016, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  77. Amare, E.; Mouquet-Rivier, C.; Rochette, I.; Adish, A.; Haki, G.D. Effect of popping and fermentation on proximate composition, minerals and absorption inhibitors, and mineral bioavailability of Amaranthus caudatus grain cultivated in Ethiopia. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 2987–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Chauhan, E.; Sarita, S. Effects of Processing (Germination and Popping) on the Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Properties of Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana). Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2018, 6, 566–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Weerasooriya, D.K.; Bean, S.R.; Nugusu, Y.; Ioerger, B.P.; Tesso, T.T. The effect of genotype and traditional food processing methods on in-vitro protein digestibility and micronutrient profile of sorghum cooked products. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Muyonga, J.H.; Andabati, B.; Ssepuuya, G. Effect of heat processing on selected grain amaranth physicochemical properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Písaříková, B.; Kráčmar, S.; Herzig, I. Amino acid contents and biological value of protein in various amaranth species. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 50, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Juzl, M.; Simeonovova, J.; Pisarikova, B. Sensory analysis of meat of cockerels and pullets fed diets containing Amaranth or fishmeal. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2005, 5, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Nooshin, N.; Sze, Y.L.; Mohamed, K.; Zhenzhou, Z.; Francisco, J.B.; Ralf, G.; Indrawati, O.; Shahin, R. Effect of extrusion on the anti-nutritional factors of food products: An overview. Food Control 2017, 7, 62–73. [Google Scholar]
  84. Rathod, R.P.; Annapure, U.S. Effect of extrusion process on anti-nutritional factors and protein and starch digestibility of lentil splits. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 66, 114–123. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kumar, A.; Mani, I.; Aradwad, P.; Samuel, D.V.K.; Jha, S.; Sahoo, P.K.; Sinha, J.P.; Kar, A. Effect of extrusion technique on anti-nutritional factors of sorghum-soya blends. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 88, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
  86. Popiela, E.; Króliczewska, B.; Zawadzki, W.; Opaliński, S.; Skiba, T. Effect of extruded amaranth grains on performance, egg traits, fatty acids composition, and selected blood characteristics of laying hens. Livest. Sci. 2013, 155, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jakubowska, M.; Gardzielewska, J.; Tarasewicz, Z.; Szczerbinska, D.; Karamucki, T.; Rybak, K.; Polawska, E.; Garczewska, J. The effect of amaranth seed added to the standard diet upon selected meat quality traits in the quail. Anim. Sci. Rep. 2013, 31, 355–362. [Google Scholar]
  88. Sokňl, J.L.; Bobel, B.K.; Fabijanska, M.; Bekta, M. Preliminary results on the influence of amaranth seeds on carcass and meat quality of fatteners. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2001, 10, 203–208. [Google Scholar]
  89. Frutos, P.; Hervás, G.; Giráldez, F.J.; Mantecó, A.R. Review. Tannins and ruminant nutrition. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2004, 2, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Gong, X.; Li, Y.; Qu, H. Removing tannins from medicinal plant extracts using an alkaline ethanol precipitation process: A Case Study of Danshen Injection. Molecules 2014, 19, 18705–18720. [Google Scholar]
  91. Tshabalala, T.; Sikosana, J.L.N.; Chivandi, E. Nutrient intake, digestibility and nitrogen retention in indigenous goats fed on Acacia nilotica fruits treated for condensed tannins. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 43, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yisehak, K.; De-Boever, J.; Janssens, G.P.J. The effect of supplementing leaves of four tannin-rich plant species with polyethylene glycol on digestibility and zootechnical performance of zebu bulls (Bos indicus). J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2013, 98, 417–423. [Google Scholar]
  93. Ben Salem, H.; Saghrouni, L.; Nefzaoui, A. Attempts to deactivate tannins in fodder shrubs with physical and chemical treatments. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 122, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kyarissiima, C.C.; Okot, M.W.; Svihus, S. Use of wood ash in the treatment of high tannin sorghum for poultry feeding. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 34, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Embaby, H.E. Effect of heat treatments on certain anti-nutrients and in vitro protein digestibility of peanut and sesame seeds. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2011, 17, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Choct, M. Enzymes for the feed industry: Past, present and future. World Poult. Sci. J. 2006, 62, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fasuyi, A.O.; Akindahunsi, A.O. Nutritional evaluation of Amaranthus cruentus leaf meal-based broiler diets supplemented with cellulase/glucanase/xylanase enzymes. Am. J. Food Technol. 2009, 4, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bhardwaj, N.; Chanda, K.; Kumar, B. Statistical optimization of nutritional and physical parameters for xylanase production from newly isolated Aspergillus oryzae LC1 and its application in the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic agro-residues. Bio-Resources 2017, 12, 8519–8538. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kumar, B.A.; Amit, K.; Alok, K.; Dharm, D. Wheat bran fermentation for the production of cellulase and xylanase by Aspergillus niger NFCCI 4113. Res. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 13, 5. [Google Scholar]
  100. Bi, Y.U.; Chung, T.K. Effects of multiple-enzyme mixtures on growth performance of broilers fed corn-soybean meal diets. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2004, 13, 178–182. [Google Scholar]
  101. Kocher, A.; Choct, M.; Ross, G.; Broz, J.; Chung, T.K. Effects of enzyme combinations on apparent metabolizable energy of corn-soybean meal-based diets in broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2003, 12, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Montero-Quintero, K.; Moreno-Rojas, R.; Molina, E.; Sánchez-Urdaneta, A.B. Chemical composition and digestibility of Amaranthus dubius Mart. ex Thell. A promising source of nutrients. Rev. Fac. Agron. 2015, 32, 361–380. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ngugi, C.C.; Oyoo-Okoth, E.; Manyala, J.O.; Fitzsimmons, K.; Kimotho, A. Characterization of the nutritional quality of amaranth leaf protein concentrates and suitability of fish meal replacement in Nile tilapia feeds. Aquac. Rep. 2017, 5, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Punita, A.; Chaturvedi, A. Effect of feeding crude red palm oil (Elaeis guineensis) and grain amaranth (Amaranthus paniculatus) to hens on total lipids, cholesterol, PUFA levels and acceptability of eggs. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2000, 55, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Phonekhampheng, O. On-Farm Feed Resources for Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Production in Laos: Evaluation of Some Local Feed Resources. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala, Umeå, Sweden, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  106. Adeniji, C.A.; Fakoya, K.A.; Omamohwo, V.R. Partial replacement of soybean cake with Amaranthus spinosus leaf meal in the diet of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2007, 50, 335–338. [Google Scholar]
  107. Bautista, E.; Barrueta, H.D.E. Bledo (Amaranthus spp.) como ingredient en dietas para conejos en crecimiento y engorde. Rev. Cient.-Fac. Cienc. Vet. 2011, 12, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  108. Shilov, V.N.; Zharkovskii, A.P. Effect of using amaranth hydrolysate on efficiency of raising weaner pigs. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2012, 38, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zralý, Z.; Písaříková, B.; Trčková, M.; Herzig, I.; Jůzl, M.; Simeonovova, J. Effect of lupine and amaranth on growth efficiency, health, and carcass characteristics and meat quality of market pigs. Acta. Vet. Brno 2006, 75, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Jacob, J. Feeding Amaranth to poultry. Cooperative extension. University of Kentucky. 2015. Available online: https://impact.extension.org/extension-articles/ (accessed on 3 May 2020).
  111. Ravindran, V.; Hood, L.; Gill, R.; Kneale, R.; Bryden, C. Nutritional evaluation of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) in broiler diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996, 63, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Niewiadomski, P.; Gomułka, P.; Poczyczynski, P.; Wozniak, M.; Szmyt, M. Dietary effect of supplementation with amaranth meal on growth performance and apparent digestibility of rainbow trout oncorhynchus myskiss. Pol. J. Nat. Sci. 2016, 31, 459–469. [Google Scholar]
  113. Orczewska-Dudek, S.; Pietras, M.; Nowak, J. The Effect of Amaranth Seeds, Sea Buckthorn Pomace and Black Chokeberry Pomace in Feed Mixtures for Broiler Chickens on Productive Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Selected Indicators of Meat Quality. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2018, 18, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Caselato-Sousa, V.M.; Ozaki, M.R.; de Almeida, E.A.; Amaya-Farfan, J. Intake of heat-expanded amaranth grain reverses endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 3281–3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Berger, A.; Gremaud, R.; Baumgartner, M.; Rein, D.; Monnard, I.; Kratky, E.; Geiger, W.; Burri, J.; Dionisi, F.; Allan, M.; et al. Cholesterol-lowering properties of amaranth grain and oil in hamsters. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2003, 73, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Chhay, T.; Pok, S.; Borin, K.; Preston, T.R. Amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) as replacement for water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) with or without paddy rice on growth performance of rabbits. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2013, 25, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  117. Fasuyi, A.O. Amaranthus cruentus leaf meal as a protein supplement in broiler finisher diets part 2. haematological responses, carcass characteristics and relative organ weights. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2007, 7, 6. [Google Scholar]
  118. Czerwińska, J.; Bartnikowska, E.; Leontowicz, H.; Lange, E.; Leontowicz, M.; Katrich, E.; Trakhtenberg, S.; Gorinstein, S. Oat (Avena sativa L.) and amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondricus) meals positively affect plasma lipid profile In rats fed cholesterol-containing diets. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2004, 15, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Szczerbińska, D.; Pyka, B.; Szabelska, E.; Ligocki, M.; Majewska, D.; Romaniszyn, K.; Sulik, M. The effect of diet amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) seeds on Japanese quail performance, somatic development hatching results and selected blood biochemical parameters. Vet. Med. Zootech. 2015, 70, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. The origin, type, and uses of amaranth species worldwide.
Table 1. The origin, type, and uses of amaranth species worldwide.
Amaranth SpeciesOriginLeafy or GrainUsesReferences
A. cruentusAmericaGrain and leafy vegetableFood, medicine, ornamental[19]
A. thunberghAfricaLeafy vegetableMedicine, fodder for livestock[2,20]
A. spinosusAmericaLeafyMedicine, food[20]
A. graecizansAfricaLeafyFood[20]
A. hypochondriacusAmericaGrain and leafy vegetableOrnamental, medicine[20,21]
A. dubiusAmericaLeafy vegetableMedicine[2,20]
A. tricolorAmericaGrain and leafy vegetableMedicine, ornamental[2,20]
A. blitumAfricaLeafy vegetableMedicine[2,20]
A. hybridusAmericaLeafy vegetableFood, medicine[6]
A. lividusAmericaLeafy vegetableFood[5]
A. caudatusAmericaGrain and leafy vegetableMedicine, ornamental[3,19]
Table
Table 3. Key anti-nutritional factors found in amaranth.
Table 3. Key anti-nutritional factors found in amaranth.
ANFsAdverse EffectReferences
Phytic acidsAffects bioavailability of calcium and other micronutrients, such as iron, copper, and zinc[57,58,59]
TanninsForm complexes with proteins that in turn cause inactivation of many digestive enzymes and decrease protein digestibility[59,60]
OxalatesLimit food mineral bioavailability[58,59]
Enzyme inhibitorsReduce protein digestibility and retard growth[59,61,62,63]
SaponinsInhibitory activities of digestive enzymes, such as amylase, glucosidase, trypsin, chymotrypsin, and lipase, which can cause indigestion-related health disorders, result in reduced intestinal absorption of many nutrients[63,64,65]
NitratesWeaknesses and rapid pulse[66,67]
Table
Table 4. Effect of amaranth leaf meal in diets of monogastric animals.
Table 4. Effect of amaranth leaf meal in diets of monogastric animals.
Monogastric AnimalInclusion LevelFindingsAuthors
Poultry5–10%Reduces the cholesterol content of the eggs, lowers growth performance, cholesterol, triglyceride, and serum lipid peroxidation levels[15]
10–20%Improved performance characteristics and nitrogen utilization[14]
Improved egg weights
8%No adverse effect on live weight, feed conversion, carcass characteristics, and meat quality[15]
Fish80%No adverse effect on performance[103]
75%Reduced growth rate[106]
5%Improved growth rate[12,105]
Rabbits20–30%Reduced feed intake[107]
32%Low growth rate[15]
Pigs10%Increased digestibility, the degree of assimilation of nitrogen, and the productivity of weaners[108,109]
Table
Table 5. Effect of amaranth grain in diets of monogastric animals.
Table 5. Effect of amaranth grain in diets of monogastric animals.
Monogastric AnimalInclusion LevelFindingsAuthors
Poultry10%Reduced the cholesterol content of the eggs, lower growth performance, cholesterol, triglyceride, and serum lipid peroxidation levels[15,104]
8%Reduced body weight, increased FCR[9,113]
8%No adverse effect observed on body weight and growth performance[16]
5%Greater egg production and lower feed conversion ratio[86]
Fish5%Improved growth rate[112]
Rabbits20%Lower tissue and blood cholesterol oxidation[114,115]
32%Increased protein and fat contents[17]
25%Negative effects on the growth rate and DM feed conversion ratio[116]
Pigs25%No adverse effect on the chemical composition, physical-chemical, or sensory properties of the meat[88]
10%No adverse effect on health or metabolism[109]
2.5–10%Increased digestibility[18,108]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Manyelo, T.G.; Sebola, N.A.; van Rensburg, E.J.; Mabelebele, M. The Probable Use of Genus amaranthus as Feed Material for Monogastric Animals. Animals 2020, 10, 1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091504

AMA Style

Manyelo TG, Sebola NA, van Rensburg EJ, Mabelebele M. The Probable Use of Genus amaranthus as Feed Material for Monogastric Animals. Animals. 2020; 10(9):1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Manyelo, Tlou Grace, Nthabiseng Amenda Sebola, Elsabe Janse van Rensburg, and Monnye Mabelebele. 2020. "The Probable Use of Genus amaranthus as Feed Material for Monogastric Animals" Animals 10, no. 9: 1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091504

APA Style

Manyelo, T. G., Sebola, N. A., van Rensburg, E. J., & Mabelebele, M. (2020). The Probable Use of Genus amaranthus as Feed Material for Monogastric Animals. Animals, 10(9), 1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop