Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Stocking Density and Carbon Sources on the Oxidative Status, and Nonspecific Immunity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Reared under Biofloc Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Dietary Fiber on Nutrients Utilization and Gut Health of Poultry: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/ani11010182
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphometric and Molecular Analyses of Ostertagia leptospicularis Assadov, 1953 from Ruminants: Species Diversity or Host Influence?

by
Anna Wyrobisz-Papiewska
1,*,
Jerzy Kowal
1,
Elżbieta Łopieńska-Biernat
2,
Paweł Nosal
1,
Iwona Polak
2,
Łukasz Paukszto
3 and
Steffen Rehbein
4
1
Department of Zoology and Animal Welfare, Faculty of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza av. 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 1A, 10-917 Olsztyn, Poland
3
Department of Plant Physiology, Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 1A, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
4
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH, Kathrinenhof Research Center, Walchenseestr. 8-12, 83101 Rohrdorf, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(1), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010182
Submission received: 2 December 2020 / Accepted: 11 January 2021 / Published: 14 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Cattle)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Pathogenic nematode Ostertagia leptospicularis, as the sole member of the subfamily Ostertagiinae, occurs in both cervid and bovid host species. The broad host specificity of this parasite draws special attention and requires a more in-depth investigation. This study was carried out to find out whether the differences in the nematode morphology were only due to the host influence, or whether genetic differences should be taken into account. To resolve this issue, the classification of O. leptospicularis was raised and discussed based on its host specificity, as well as morphological and genetic characteristics. A combined morphological–molecular approach was used to compare specimens resembling O. leptospicularis collected from naturally infected hosts of various ruminant species (roe deer, red deer, fallow deer, and cattle). Both morphological and molecular analyses highlighted the distinctiveness of O. leptospicularis collected from cattle in Germany, and therefore should now be considered to be a different strain that those collected form cervids in central Europe.

Abstract

Ostertagia leptospicularis Assadov, 1953 was formally described in roe deer Capreolus capreolus and has been reported in a wide range of ruminants, including other Cervidae, as well as Bovidae. Nematode specimens derived from various host species exhibit morphological similarity; however, some differences can be observed. It is unclear if this is due to the differential reaction of one nematode species in different host species (i.e., host-induced changes) or because of distinct nematode species in these hosts (i.e., species complex). This paper focuses on specimens resembling O. leptospicularis f. leptospicularis and its closely related species (Ostertagia ostertagi f. ostertagi) collected from various hosts. Morphometric and molecular techniques were applied to assess host-induced changes in nematode morphology and to clarify its systematic classification. There was an overall effect of host species on measurements of nematodes resembling O. leptospicularis (both males and females), but the distinctiveness of the specimens from cattle Bos taurus were highlighted. The results obtained may suggest that the specimens of O. leptospicularis from cattle in Germany and cervids in central Europe belong to different strains. Furthermore, nematodes from the cervid strain appear to circulate within particular host species, which can be seen in the stated morphological variations.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ostertagia leptospicularis is a member of a group of ruminant stomach worms and, as the sole species of the subfamily Ostertagiinae, seems to be a generalist, capable of infecting a wide variety of hosts [1]. This nematode species was described for the first time by Assadov [2] in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), and therefore, it is considered to be primarily a parasite of Cervidae (red deer (Cervus elaphus), sika deer (C. nippon), fallow deer (Dama dama) and moose (Alces alces)); however, it is also able to establish in various representatives of Bovidae (cattle (Bos taurus), European bison (Bison bonasus), domestic sheep (Ovis aries), mouflon (O. musimon), domestic goat (Capra hircus), Alpine ibex (C. ibex), and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra)) [1,3].
Some findings indicate that O. leptospicularis is highly pathogenic, especially in cattle. It has been proved that its infectivity and pathogenicity in young cattle is higher when compared with blood sucking Ostertagia ostertagi (Stiles, 1892) [4]. Moreover, the overall intensity of infection increases if O. leptospicularis co-occurs [5,6]. This nematode species may pose a potential threat not only to cattle, but also to other grazed livestock where pastures are shared with feral ruminants treated as principal hosts [7]. Thus, several aspects of the biology of O. leptospicularis require further clarification.
An accurate description of O. leptospicularis concerning naturally infected roe deer [2] has been used to identify specimens from other hosts [8,9,10,11,12]. More detailed characterizations, as well as mentions of specimens collected not only from cervids, have emerged thus far; however, they are mainly based on experimental infections [7,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], which interfere with those occurring in natural conditions. As pointed out by Suarez et al. [18], specimens of O. ostertagi and O. leptospicularis maintained in sheep are of smaller size when compared with those collected from their principal host (cattle and roe deer, respectively).
Careful study on another species belonging to the subfamily Ostertagiinae, Teladorsagia circumcincta (Stadleman, 1894), has revealed morphological analysis to be relevant. Until recently, T. circumcincta was treated as a species capable of infecting both domestic and wild ruminant hosts. The most significant research [20,21] demonstrated the presence of two distinct strains within domestic hosts (sheep and goat) that are characterized by morphological and molecular differences. The stated variability in morphology could be attributed to phenotypic plasticity and could correspond to environmental changes (i.e., host species and its resistance to infection) [21]. Such influences have to be considered in this study, especially since accurate identification of ostertagiine nematodes is essential to diagnosis and control of the diseases they cause (i.e., the efficacy of different anthelmintics or its compounds show considerable variations among species) [22].
Morphology provides the necessary data to identify a species; however, in the absence of distinguishing features, morphometric methods seem to be more utile. Nevertheless, the remarkable similarity in morphology and morphometrics sometimes makes the identification of individual species doubtful or almost impossible. Although morphology still plays an important role in the species description, taken alone, it often does not provide an adequate taxonomic resolution [23]. Molecular techniques have been proven to be useful for examining the taxonomy of ostertagiine species, where morphological characteristics were unreliable to distinguish between species [20,21,24,25,26]. Many studies have shown that sequences of various regions of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are useful for differentiating morphologically distinct species and detecting the presence of cryptic species that are morphologically similar but genetically distinct [24,25,27,28,29,30,31].
Different regions of rDNA (i.e., the intergenic non-transcribed spacer IGS, the external transcribed spacer ETS, transcribed rRNA genes and internal transcribed spacers ITS) evolve at different rates, and hence differ in usefulness for examining encountered problems related to systematics. Sequences of rRNA genes (18S, 5.8S, and 28S) are highly conserved and therefore are of value for examining evolutionary questions [32]. The 18S rRNA gene, due to its stable persistence through generations, is used in phylogenetic analysis among taxa. Sequence variation in this gene within a single species is expected to be very low or absent [33]. Regions of the first and second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1 and ITS-2, respectively) are less conserved than the genes; however, they are one of the most variable nuclear loci commonly used to discriminate nematode species. ITS-1 and/or ITS-2 have been successfully used in many studies concerning taxonomy of ostertagiine nematodes, because they are highly species-specific [22,25,32,34,35]. ITS-2 in particular has been shown to be a valuable tool for species differentiation. For instance, the lack of difference between ITS-2 of T. circumcincta, T. trifurcata (Ransom, 1907), and T. davtiani Andreev & Satubaldin, 1954 indicated that they represent a single species [36], similar to Marshallagia marshalli Ransom, 1907 and M. occidentalis Ransom, 1907 [37].
Molecular techniques give the opportunity to describe and define biological diversity but are not a panacea for species delimitation. Hence, molecular data are the most useful and valuable when combined with other types of data, especially since morphological characteristics alone are often not adequate for species recognition [38,39]. Thus, synergy between these approaches is needed to collect valid data on biodiversity. An integration of morphological and molecular criteria will have a bearing on understanding the issue [23,24,39].
The specific objective of the presented study was to compare specimens resembling O. leptospicularis f. leptospicularis collected from naturally infected hosts of various ruminant species (roe deer, red deer, fallow deer, and cattle). A combined morphological-molecular approach was used to assess any host-induced changes in nematode morphology and to clarify its systematic classification. Morphological analysis was also undertaken in relation to its closely related species O. ostertagi f. ostertagi (collected from cattle) to determine, not only intraspecific variations but also interspecific differences.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection

Adult nematodes were derived from abomasum (contents and washings of the mucosa) of naturally infected hosts (O. leptospicularis—roe deer, red deer, fallow deer, cattle; O. ostertagi—cattle). The origin of hosts (Poland, Slovakia, or Germany) and number of nematode specimens collected and morphometrically analyzed are shown in Table 1. The minor morphs of the species were not included in analysis.

2.2. Morphological Analysis and Measurements

The examined nematodes (n = 167) were subjected to detailed morphological and morphometric analyses. Entire specimens and/or hand-cut sections were mounted on glass slides in glycerol-jelly or lactophenol [40], photographed, and identified based on morphological features under a zoom-stereomicroscope, and then using a microscope, both equipped with a digital camera. The taxonomy of polymorphic males among the genera and species of abomasal nematodes within the Ostertagiinae follows Dróżdż [41].
Morphological characteristics included as measurements were as follows: total body length and esophageal features (both sexes), bursa copulatorix (males), and ovijector and tail (females). Measurements were made for 103 adult specimens of O. leptospicularis (59 males, 44 females), as well as 64 adult specimens of O. ostertagi (32 each for both males and females) (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). Furthermore, the synlophe (i.e., pattern of longitudinal cuticular ridges) was studied in transverse sections for an additional 71 specimens (37 O. leptospicularis and 34 O. ostertagi; gender participation and host species can be seen in Table 4).
The anterior and posterior end of the esophageal-intestinal (EI) valves were determined for both sexes based on Lichtenfels et al. [14] and Lichtenfels and Hoberg [42]. The bursa ray pattern and numbering of the bursal papillae were consistent with Dróżdż [8,41] and Jančev [43], as well as Lichtenfels and Hoberg [42]. Hand-cut sections for synlophe identification were made at the EI junction (EIJ) and the midbody for both sexes, as well as anterior to the capitulum of the spicules for males [14,24].

2.3. Statistical Analyses

The morphometric data were compared for various host species. Data on worm characteristics (Table 2 and Table 3) were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), with p < 0.05 being considered statistically significant (Statistica 13 software).
Further analyses included O. leptospicularis specimens only and were performed to estimate which variables best separate the host species. All metrical features (variables) included in Table 2 were submitted to discriminant analysis using the host species as a grouping variable (Statgraphics Centurion 18 software). Specimens with a missing value were not included in the canonical analysis. The forward stepwise variable selection procedure was applied using the minimization of Wilks’ lambda as a selection criterion.

2.4. Molecular and Phylogenetic Analyses

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the midbody of specimens used in morphological analyses (O. leptospicularis from roe deer, red deer, and fallow deer) or pooled third-stage larvae (O. leptospicularis from cattle) using Sherlock AX (A&A Biotechnology, Poland), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The midbody of the specimens was cut after species identification and measuring the total length. Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis.
The second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-2) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) was used as the target to define specific marker. ITS-2 was amplified using forward and reverse primers (5′-CAGACGCTTAGAGTGGTGAA-3′ and 5′-TGCATGTGTTTTCTTGAACTGA-3′, respectively) designed from the aligned sequences available in GenBank (Geneious software 13.0). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mix was comprised of 0.5-unit Platinum Taq polymerase (LifeTechnologies), 1xTaq buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each dNTP, 20 pmol of each primer, and 4 µL genomic DNA.
The PCR conditions were as follows: a single step of pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 8 min (min), followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s (sec), 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and the final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. PCR products were confirmed by gel electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels and visualized with Midori Green Advance (Polgen) staining. The purified PCR products were sequenced (Genomed, Poland) and compared with sequences available in the GenBank database using Geneious Prime v. 11.0.610 [44].
New nucleic acid sequences (ten shared by O. leptospicularis derived from various host species) were deposited in GenBank.
The newly obtained sequences of ITS-2 rDNA were aligned in MAFFT v7.310 with a selected set of other nematode sequences (including Ostertagiinae sp.) downloaded from the NCBI database, with Haemonchus contortus used as an outgroup. Bayesian Inference (BI) was used for genome-wide phylogenetic analyses in MrBayes v.3.2.6 [45]. Before BI analysis, the best fitting substitution model was searched in Mega 7 [46], and the model JC69 + G was selected. BI partitioning analysis was carried out to develop a majority rule consensus tree with 1 × 106 generation using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. The tree sampling frequency was 200 generations.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological and Morphometric Analyses

The analyzed nematodes, both males and females, exhibited some morphological similarity. The characteristic that easily distinguished the studied species was the esophagus, which was clearly visible, but differed with respect to the length of EI valves. Prominent long EI valves characterized nematodes from O. leptospicularis, while explicitly short valves were those from O. ostertagi (Figure 1). Cuticular ridges were stated in all specimens but differed in number in relation to the nematode and host species. Nevertheless, the number of ridges in each case attained the highest value at the EIJ and decreased towards the posterior end of the body. The bursa ray formula 2-1-2 was present in both species studied herein. Furthermore, the spicules of O. leptospicularis from its principal host (roe deer) clearly showed differences when compared with those obtained from cattle (Figure 2). Characteristics and measurements of O. leptospicularis and O. ostertagi (both males and females) are noted in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively, and the observed differences are listed below. The number of longitudinal ridges for additionally analyzed specimens are shown in Table 4 and Figure 3.

3.1.1. Male Specimens

There was an overall diversity of nematodes resembling O. leptospicularis collected from different host species (Table 2). There were significant differences between measurements concerning the length of the (i) body, (ii) EI valves, and (iii) both spicules, as well as (iv) EI valve width. Most differences were noted between specimens collected from Bovidae and Cervidae; however, differences among representatives of Cervidae also emerged. No significant differences were observed between measurements of total esophagus length or trifurcation of the spicules.
Using a forward stepwise selection algorithm, it was determined that four variables were significant predictors of host species (total body length, intestinal valve length and width, left spicule length). Both canonical discriminant functions had small values of Wilks’ lambda (0.126165 and 0.4477, respectively) and were significant (Chi-squared approximation, p < 0.0001). As illustrated in Figure 4, the first function separated specimens from cattle and cervid host species, and the second function differentiated specimens from principal host (i.e., roe deer) and other host species.
All specimens studied had a similar number of longitudinal ridges over many of the analyzed levels (Table 4). Most of the studied specimens had 36 longitudinal ridges at the EIJ, excluding those collected from roe deer (in some cases it was 35 ridges). The number of longitudinal ridges at the midbody ranged from 29 to 36 and specimens derived from cattle varied the most. Slightly reduced variability (i.e., 29–34 ridges) was noted just above the anterior end of the spicules. No differences were observed between specimens collected from red deer and cattle, while those form roe deer at this level varied the most.
No significant differences were found between O. ostertagi derived from cattle differing in the country of origin (Table 3).
Transverse sections were possible to be made for O. ostertagi from Germany only, hence the comparison of longitudinal ridges between specimens differing in the country of origin could not be made. The lowest/highest number of ridges at all studied levels were lower/higher, respectively, when compared with those obtained for the specimens of O. leptospicularis (excluding the highest value reached just above the spicules) (Table 4).

3.1.2. Female Specimens

There were significant differences between all measurements made for O. leptospicularis from different hosts (Table 2). Most of the differences, similar to males, were between Bovidae and Cervidae; however, the differences among representatives of Cervidae have also been stated.
Using a forward stepwise selection algorithm, it was determined that four variables were significant predictors of host species (intestinal valve length and width, ovijector length and tail length). Both canonical discriminant functions had small values of Wilks’ lambda (0.0528644 and 0.732462, respectively) and were significant (Chi-squared approximation, p < 0.0001). As illustrated in Figure 5, the first function clearly separated specimens from cattle and cervid host species.
Slightly smaller differences in the number of longitudinal ridges were observed between O. leptospicularis specimens derived from different ruminant hosts; however, those from roe deer proved to be slightly more diverse than those from cattle (Table 4).
Significant differences were found between measurements made for O. ostertagi from cattle of Polish and German origins, concerning the length of the (i) body, (ii) esophagus, and (iii) ovijector, as well as (iv) EI valve width (Table 3)
Transverse sections were not made for O. ostertagi from Poland, hence the comparison with those conducted for specimens from Germany could not be made. The largest differences were observed at the midbody, where the lowest value reached for O. ostertagi was quite like the highest for O. leptospicularis (Table 4).

3.2. Molecular and Phylogenetic Analyses

The phylogenetic tree (Figure 6) represents the similarity level among ITS-2 rDNA sequences of the analyzed samples (numbers from 1 to 10 before the nematode species name; see Figure 6 legend for GenBank accession numbers of newly obtained sequences) and other nematode species. The location of the studied sequences in the presented tree at a considerable distance from each other, when isolated from the same or close phylogenetically host species, could be the basis for inferring the randomness of the formation of separate populations. Our previous study [1] showed that nematodes of the subfamily Ostertagiinae appear to be rather specific to a species or family of hosts. Thus, the presented phylogenetic tree was extended to other Ostertagiinae species and their hosts, and it showed that O. leptospicularis form separate populations specialized in colonizing one type of host.
Within the studied specimens, it was possible to clearly mark two clusters in the phylogenetic tree with O. leptospicularis derived from cattle (marked in yellow) and cervid host species (marked in green). Nematode specimens from both clusters were characterized by high levels of intraspecific variability in the ITS-2 rDNA sequences. This may indicate that nematodes circulate within particular host species (i.e., roe deer, red deer, and fallow deer).

4. Discussion

Ostertagia leptospicularis was originally described in roe deer from Azerbaijan [2]; however, its widespread occurrence suggests an extensive historical and geographical range. This species has been treated, so far, as a typical parasite of cervids and domestic bovids in the Palearctic region [8,13,47], although it has been successfully introduced to other Holarctic regions and identified in many host species [1,17].
The results obtained herein appear to be partially consistent with the first description of O. leptospicularis. The data concerning morphometric criteria are not so numerous, but it is difficult to disagree with Kutzer and Hinaidy [47], who analyzed O. leptospicularis from wild ruminants (roe deer, red deer, chamois) in Austria and suggested that Assadov [2] measured atypical specimens. The range of the body and esophagus length presented in the first description was higher than the mean values attained in this study. The results presented by Assadov [2] are most like those obtained for specimens derived from red deer. However, the measurements of EI valve width and spicule length, made for specimens collected from roe deer, are consistent with the first ones. A comparison of these values depicts the nematodes analyzed the first time as having wider EI valves and longer spicules. The latter ones attract special attention due to the high minimum value, which pleads in favor of atypicality of specimens described by Assadov [2]. As pointed out in some studies, spicule length is a morphological feature that distinguishes individuals from roe deer and red deer. This research not only confirmed that those from red deer are slightly smaller [43,47,48], but also proved that O. leptospicularis from fallow deer and cattle have even shorter spicules. Nevertheless, the outcomes obtained herein suggest that based on the length of spicules, the specimens from different cervid host species seem to remain undistinguished, while those from cattle are outstanding. The same conclusion arises from outcomes concerning body length.
As demonstrated by Lichtenfels et al. [14] and Lichtenfels and Hoberg [42], differences not only in spicules and genital cones, but also in the length of EI valves, are useful for identifying males of Ostertagiinae to the species level. This morphological feature of O. leptospicularis was included in only a few analyses (i) made in North America, (ii) based on artificial infections, (iii) presented outcomes for O. leptospicularis along with those for O. kolchida, and/or (iv) with combined results obtained for specimens collected from bovids (cattle, sheep and goat) [9,14,17]; hence, comparable data cannot be gathered. Most available papers concerning the morphology of O. leptospicularis are limited to those that give the values of length and/or width of the body, esophagus, spicules, and/or gubernaculum [13,18,43,47,48,49]. The length of EI valves is nonetheless a perfect criterion to distinguish O. leptospicularis (both males and females) from Ostertagia ostertagi, as well as other closely related representatives of the subfamily Ostertagiinae. The identification of females of most ostertagiine species has so far been treated as impossible to conduct in mixed infections [7]; however, the length of the mentioned structure is easy to observe and has distinctly simplified the issue. Such a conclusion has been already suggested by Lichtenfels and Pilitt [50]. As demonstrated in this research, regardless of host species, O. leptospicularis had EI valves that were almost twice as long as O. ostertagi (both sexes) (Figure 1). Moreover, O. leptospicularis derived from cattle were noted once more as having become an outstanding species, due to its prominently long EI valves.
Lichtenfels et al. [7,14] revealed that differences in the length of EI valves were corelated with differences observed in the lateral synlophe. Species with a Type 2 lateral synlophe (i.e., three continuous and parallel ridges) had a long valve, while those with a Type 1 (i.e., only one continuous ridge in each lateral field) had a shorter valve. Other studies of the Ostertagiinae of domestic and sylvatic hosts have demonstrated the utility of the synlophe as a key in separating species [50,51,52]. Nonetheless, papers concerning the number of cuticular ridges of O. leptospicularis are limited, and are focused mainly on those at the midbody [13,18,19], which has been revealed herein as the most variable. This result is not consistent with further findings that suggest the number of ridges at the midbody to be constant. In the present research, there was enough variability to disqualify the synlophe as a diagnostic characteristic. The number of cuticular ridges may be useful, although only as a supplementary feature to the length of the EI valves.
In this study, variability in some measurements of adult O. leptospicularis from different host species was detected. A comparison of male measurements depicted those from (i) roe deer as having the longest esophagus, (ii) cattle as having the longest and widest EI valves, and (iii) roe deer as having a slightly longer left and right spicule when compared with other hosts. Nevertheless, spicules of specimens derived from cattle appeared to be strikingly smaller than those from cervid hosts (Figure 2). A comparison of females revealed that those from cattle had the highest values of the majority of analyzed characteristics, except for the total ovijector length. The majority of the aforementioned differences may be treated as host-induced ones; however, the distinctiveness of O. leptospicularis from cattle should be highlighted.
Such a conclusion is consistent with the results of genetic analyses, in which O. leptospicularis collected from cattle in Germany were clearly separated from those derived from cervid host species in central Europe (Figure 6). Therefore, it can be suggested that the specimens from Bos taurus in Germany and cervid host species in central Europe belong to different strains. Furthermore, nematodes from the latter strain circulate within particular host species that can be seen in the morphological variations of specimens derived from roe deer, red deer, and fallow deer. It is also consistent with the results of our prior study where roe deer were identified to be a principal host of O. leptospicularis [1]. The aforementioned circulation may also exist among bovid host species, which requires further analyses, enriched with a wider molecular approach.

5. Conclusions

The morphological features that would allow us to consider the analyzed nematodes as different species have not yet been stated. Whether O. leptospicularis from cattle in Germany and Cervidae in central Europe should be treated as different strains or lines (strongly connected with the host species) able to circulate among hosts from a particular family requires further investigation. This is important due to the possibility of parasite exchange in the pastures shared by domestic and wild ruminants, as well as a higher probability of this nematode species being introduced by imported bovids. To date, O. leptospicularis has been identified in cattle from only a few European countries, including Germany, Austria, Belgium, and the Netherlands [53,54,55,56,57], and therefore even more attention should be dedicated to this species.
Although the Ostertagiinae subfamily is the subject of consistent study, many issues are still uncertain. New information on O. leptospicularis presented herein shows that some other findings are required to develop an identification key to both males and females of this species (e.g., details of the esophagus, genital cone and synlophe). It is apparent that more characteristics and nematode specimens resembling O. leptospicularis from all possible hosts have to be studied before any revision of the systematics can be made. More valid conclusions must await the results of other studies that are currently in progress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W.-P.; data curation, J.K.; formal analysis, A.W.-P., J.K., E.Ł.-B., Ł.P. and I.P.; funding acquisition, P.N.; methodology, A.W.-P., J.K. and E.Ł.-B.; project administration, A.W.-P. and P.N.; resources, J.K. and S.R.; software, E.Ł.-B.; supervision, J.K. and P.N.; visualization, A.W.-P. and J.K.; writing—original draft, A.W.-P.; writing—review and editing, A.W.-P., J.K. and P.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. The raw data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wyrobisz-Papiewska, A.; Kowal, J.; Nosal, P.; Chovancova, G.; Rehbein, S. Host specificity and species diversity of the Ostertagiinae Lopez-Neyra 1947 in ruminants—A European perspective. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Assadov, S.M. On the study of the fauna of the Trichostrongylidae of the roe in Azerbaidjan. Izv. Akad. Nauk Azerbaidjan SSR 1953, 1, 59–66. (In Rusian) [Google Scholar]
  3. Borgsteede, F.H.M. Experimental cross-infections with gastrointestinal nematode of sheep and cattle. Z Parasitenkd. 1981, 65, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saqur, I.; Armour, J.; Bairden, K.; Dunn, A.M.; Jennings, F.W.; Murray, M. Observations on the infectivity and pathogenicity of three isolates of Ostertagia spp sensu lato in calves. Res. Vet. Sci. 1982, 31, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saqur, I.; Armour, J.; Bairden, A.M.; Dunn, A.M.; Jennings, F.W. Ostertagia leptospicularis Asadov 1953 as a pathogen in British cattle. Vet. Rec. 1980, 107, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Saqur, I.; Armour, J.; Bairden, A.M.; Dunn, A.M.; Murray, M. Experimental studies on the interaction between infections of Ostertagia leptospicularis and other bovine Ostertagia species. Z. Parasitenk. 1984, 70, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lichtenfels, J.R.; Pilitt, P.A.; Lancaster, M.B. Systematics of the Nematodes that cause Ostertagiosis in cattle, sheep and goats in North America. Vet. Parasitol. 1988, 27, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dróżdż, J. Studies on helminths and helminthiases in Cervidae, I. Revision of the subfamily Ostertagiinae Sarwar, 1956 and an attempt to explain the phylogenesis of its representatives. Acta Parasitol. 1965, 13, 445–481. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mulrooney, D.M.; Bishop, J.K.; Zimmerman, G.L. First report of Ostertagia leptospicularis (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) in Calves (Bos taurus) from North Amercia. J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 1991, 58, 260–262. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ortiz, J.M.; Goyena, M.; Alonso, F. First report of two polymorphic species of Ostertagia (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) in Cervus elaphus in Spain: O. leptospicularis and O. kolchida. Res. Rev. Parasitol. 1996, 56, 221–223. [Google Scholar]
  11. Beraldo, P.; Pascotto, E. Cryopreservation of roe deer abomasal nematodes for morphological identification. Folia Parasitol. 2014, 61, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Davidson, R.K.; Kutz, S.J.; Madslein, K.; Hoberg, E.; Handeland, K. Gastrointestinal parasites in an isolated Norwegian population of wild red deer (Cervus elaphus). Acta Vet. Scand. 2014, 56, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bisset, S.A.; Kleinjan, E.D.; Vlassoff, A. Development of Ostertagia leptospicularis in cattle, and the differentiation of infective larvae and female adults from those of O. ostertagi. Vet. Parasitol. 1984, 16, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lichtenfels, J.R.; Pilitt, P.A.; Lancaster, M.B. Cuticular ridge patterns of seven species of Ostertagiinae (Nematoda) parasitic in domestic ruminants. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 1988, 55, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lancaster, M.B.; Hong, C. The identification of females within the subfamily Ostertagiinae Lopez-Neyra 1947. Vet. Parasitol. 1990, 35, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Suarez, V.H.; Cabaret, J. Interbreeding in the subfamily Ostertagiinae (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) of ruminants. J. Parasitol. 1992, 78, 402–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hoberg, E.P.; Lichtenfels, J.R.; Pilitt, P.A. Comparative of Ostertagia mossi and Ostertagia dikmansi (Trichostrongylidae) from Odocoileus virginianus and comments on other Ostertagia spp. from the Cervidae. Syst. Parasitol. 1993, 24, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Suarez, V.H.; Durette, D.M.C.; Cabaret, J. Description of Ostertagia ostertagi and Ostertagia leptospicularis hybrids in experimentally infected sheep. J. Parasitol. 1993, 79, 874–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Durette, D.M.C.; Cabaret, J. The distances between cuticular ridges follow a Gaussian function in ortertagiine nematodes: The potential use of this phenomenon as a taxonomic criterion. Syst. Parasitol. 1994, 29, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gasnier, N.; Cabaret, J. Evidence for the existence of a sheep and a goat line of Teladorsagia circumcincta (Nematoda). Parasitol. Res. 1996, 82, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gasnier, N.; Cabaret, J.; Durette, D. Sheep and goat lines of Teladorsagia circumcincta (Nematoda): From allozyme to morphological identification. J. Parasitol. 1997, 83, 527–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Heise, M.; Epe, C.; Schnieder, T. Differences in the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-2) of eight species of gastrointestinal nematodes of ruminants. J. Parasitol. 1999, 85, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wyrobisz, A.; Kowal, J.; Nosal, P. Insight into Species diversity of the Trichostrongylidae Leiper, 1912 (Nematoda:Strongylida) in ruminants. J. Helminthol. 2016, 90, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hoberg, E.P.; Monsen, K.J.; Kutz, S.; Blouin, M.S. Structure, biodiversity, and historical biogeography of nematode fauna in holarctic ruminants: Morphological and molecular diagnoses of Teladorsagia boreoarcticus n. sp. (Nematoda: Ostertaginae), a dimorphic cryptic species in muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). J. Parasitol. 1999, 85, 910–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Leignel, V.; Cabaret, J.; Humbert, J.F. New molecular evidence that Teladorsagia circumcincta (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidea) is a species complex. J. Parasitol. 2002, 88, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grillo, V.; Jackson, F.; Cabaret, J.; Gilleard, J.S. Population genetic analysis of the ovine parasitic nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta and evidence for a cryptic species. Int. J. Parasitol. 2007, 37, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gassser, R.B. PCR-based technology in veterinary parasitology. Vet. Parasitol. 1999, 84, 229–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gasser, R.B.; Chilton, N.B. Applications of single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) to taxonomy, diagnosis, population genetics and molecular evolution of parasitic nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2000, 101, 201–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gasser, R.B.; Newton, S.E. Genomic and genetic research on bursate nematodes: Significance, implications and prospects. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 509–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bloiun, M.S. Molecular prospecting for cryptic species of nematodes: Mitochondrial DNA versus internal transcribed spacer. Int. J. Parasitol. 2002, 32, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tan, N.; Chilton, N.B.; Huby, C.F.; Jex, A.R.; Gasser, R.B.; Beveridge, I. Molecular evidence for a cryptic species within the parasitic nematode Marcoponema comani (Strongyloidea: Cloacininae). Mol. Cell. Probes 2012, 26, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chilton, N.B. The use of nuclear rDNA markers for ithe identification of bursate nematodes (order Strongylida) and for diagnosis of infections. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2004, 5, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Foucher, A.; Wilson, M. Development of a polymerase chain reaction-based denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis technique to study nematode species biodiversity using the 18S rDNA gene. Mol. Ecol. Note 2002, 2, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zarlenga, D.S.; Hoberg, E.P.; Stringfellow, F.; Lichtenfels, J.R. Comparison of two polymorphic species of Ostertagia and phylogenetic relationships within the Ostertagiinae (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) inferred from ribosomal DNA repeat and mitochrondrial DNA sequences. J. Parasitol. 1998, 84, 806–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lienard, E.; Depaquit, J.; Ferte, H. Spiculopteragia mathevossiani is the minor morph of S. spiculoptera: Molecular evidence. Vet. Res. 2006, 37, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Stevenson, L.A.; Gasser, R.B.; Chilton, N.B. The ITS-2 rDNA of Teladorsagia circumcincta. T. trifurcata and T. davtiani (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) indicates that these taxa are one species. Int. J. Parasitol. 1996, 26, 1123–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dallas, J.F.; Irvine, J.R.; Halvorsen, O. DNA evidence that Marshallagia marshalli Ransom, 1907 and M. occidentalis Ransom, 1907 (Nematoda: Ostertagiinae) from Svalbard reindeer are conspecific. Syst. Parasitol. 2001, 50, 101–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bickford, D.; Lohman, D.J.; Sodhi, N.S.; Ng, P.K.; Meier, R.; Winker, K.; Ingram, K.K.; Das, I. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 22, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schlick, S.B.C.; Seifert, B.; Stauffer, C.; Christian, E.; Crozier, R.H.; Steiner, F.M. Without morphology, cryptic species stay in taxonomic crypsis following discovery. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22, 391–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Falinowski, A. Techniki Zbioru Utrwalania i Konserwacji Zwierząt; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego: Warszawa, Poland, 2007; pp. 272–273. [Google Scholar]
  41. Dróżdż, J. Polymorphism in the Ostertagiinae (Lopez-Neyra, 1947) and comments on the systematics of these nematodes. Syst. Parasitolol. 1995, 32, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lichtenfels, J.R.; Hoberg, E.P. The systematics of nematodes that cause ostertagiosis in domestic and wild ruminants in North America: Ad update and a key to species. Vet. Parasitol. 1993, 46, 33–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jančev, J. Helminths in the fallow deer (Dama dama L.) in the Voden and Krichim Hunting Preserves. Khelmintologiya 1979, 8, 64–82. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones, H.S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kutzer, E.; Hinaidy, H.K. Die Parasiten der wildebenden Wiederkäuer Österreichs. Z. Parasitenk. 1969, 32, 354–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jansen, J. Lebmaagtrichostrongyliden bei Nerelandse Kerten; Proefschrift, Universiteit Utrecht: Utrechts, The Netherlands, 1958. [Google Scholar]
  49. Erhardová, B.; Kotrlý, A. Helminthen aus dem Verdauungstrakt der freilebeden Wiederkäuer. Čs. Parasit. 1955, 2, 41–68. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lichtenfels, J.R.; Pilitt, P.A. A redesription of Ostertagia bisonis (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) and a key to species of Ostertagiinae with a tapering lateral synlophe from domestic ruminants in North America. J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 1991, 58, 213–244. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lichtenfels, J.R.; Pilitt, P.A.; Fruetel, M. Cuticular ridge pattern in Ostertagia gruehneri and Ostertagia arctica (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) from Caribou, Rangifer tarandus. J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 1990, 57, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lichtenfels, J.R.; Pilitt, P.A.; Belem, A.M.G. Cuticular ridge patterns in Mazamastrongylus odocoilei and Mazamastrongylus pursglovei (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) from whitetailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus. Syst. Parasitol. 1993, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hinaidvy, H.K.; Gutierres, V.C.; Supperer, R. Die Gastrointestinal-Helminthen des Rindes in Österreich. Zbl. Vet. Med. B 1972, 19, 679–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Borgsteede, F.H.M.; Burg, W.P.J. Worm burdens in cows II. An analysis of the population of nematodes in the abomasa of adult diary cows. Vet. Parasitol. 1982, 10, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vercruysse, J.; Dorny, P.; Berghen, P.; Geeraerts, J. Abomasal parasitism in dairy cows in Belgium. Vet. Parasitol. 1986, 22, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Marnu, W.; Wintersteller, E.; Prosl, H. Monthly and seasonal fluctuations in abomasal nematode worm burden of naturally infected cattle in Austria. Vet. Parasitol. 1987, 23, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rehbein, S.; Baggott, D.G.; Johnson, E.G.; Kunkle, B.N.; Yazwinski, T.A.; Yoon, S.; Cramer, L.G.; Soll, M.D. Nematode burdens of pastured cattle treated once at turnout with eprinomectin extended-release injection. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 192, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Animals 11 00182 g001 550
Figure 1. Esophageal-intestinal (EI) valve of (a) Ostertagia leptospicularis from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), (b) Ostertagia ostertagi from cattle (Bos taurus; arrows at anterior and posterior end; magnification 600×).
Figure 1. Esophageal-intestinal (EI) valve of (a) Ostertagia leptospicularis from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), (b) Ostertagia ostertagi from cattle (Bos taurus; arrows at anterior and posterior end; magnification 600×).
Animals 11 00182 g001
Animals 11 00182 g002 550
Figure 2. Spicules of Ostertagia leptospicularis from (a) roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), (b) cattle (Bos taurus) ventral view (magnification 400×).
Figure 2. Spicules of Ostertagia leptospicularis from (a) roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), (b) cattle (Bos taurus) ventral view (magnification 400×).
Animals 11 00182 g002
Animals 11 00182 g003 550
Figure 3. Longitudinal cuticular ridges of Ostertagia leptospicularis males shown in transverse sections (a) at the esophageal-intestinal (EI) valves, n = 36, host roe deer (Capreolus capreolus); (b1–4) at the midbody: (b1) n = 31, cattle (Bos taurus); (b2) n = 32, cattle; (b3) n = 35, red deer (Cervus elaphus); (b4) n = 36, roe deer; (c1–4) above the anterior end of the spicules: (c1) n = 30, red deer; (c2) n = 31, cattle; (c3) n = 32, roe deer; (c4) n = 34, roe deer (magnification 600×).
Figure 3. Longitudinal cuticular ridges of Ostertagia leptospicularis males shown in transverse sections (a) at the esophageal-intestinal (EI) valves, n = 36, host roe deer (Capreolus capreolus); (b1–4) at the midbody: (b1) n = 31, cattle (Bos taurus); (b2) n = 32, cattle; (b3) n = 35, red deer (Cervus elaphus); (b4) n = 36, roe deer; (c1–4) above the anterior end of the spicules: (c1) n = 30, red deer; (c2) n = 31, cattle; (c3) n = 32, roe deer; (c4) n = 34, roe deer (magnification 600×).
Animals 11 00182 g003
Animals 11 00182 g004 550
Figure 4. Scatter plot of discriminant function analysis comparing selected morphological characteristics of Ostertagia leptospicularis males derived from different host species (brown crosses indicates particular centroides).
Figure 4. Scatter plot of discriminant function analysis comparing selected morphological characteristics of Ostertagia leptospicularis males derived from different host species (brown crosses indicates particular centroides).
Animals 11 00182 g004
Animals 11 00182 g005 550
Figure 5. Scatter plot of discriminant function analysis comparing selected morphological characteristics of Ostertagia leptospicularis females derived from different host species (brown crosses indicates particular centroides).
Figure 5. Scatter plot of discriminant function analysis comparing selected morphological characteristics of Ostertagia leptospicularis females derived from different host species (brown crosses indicates particular centroides).
Animals 11 00182 g005
Animals 11 00182 g006 550
Figure 6. Consensus tree depicting the ITS-2 similarity of newly obtained sequences of Ostertagia leptospicularis (1–MT954614 221bp, 2–MT954616 219bp, 3–MT954631 219bp, 4–MT956640 225bp, 5–MT954907 222bp, 6–MT956639 145 bp, 7–MT954410 150bp, 8–MT954415 149bp, 9–MT954592 152bp, 10–MT956639 145bp) and those available in the NCBI database. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) are given at each node.
Figure 6. Consensus tree depicting the ITS-2 similarity of newly obtained sequences of Ostertagia leptospicularis (1–MT954614 221bp, 2–MT954616 219bp, 3–MT954631 219bp, 4–MT956640 225bp, 5–MT954907 222bp, 6–MT956639 145 bp, 7–MT954410 150bp, 8–MT954415 149bp, 9–MT954592 152bp, 10–MT956639 145bp) and those available in the NCBI database. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) are given at each node.
Animals 11 00182 g006
Table
Table 1. Origin of hosts and number of nematode specimens morphometrically analyzed.
Table 1. Origin of hosts and number of nematode specimens morphometrically analyzed.
HostOstertagia leptospicularisOstertagia ostertagi
MalesFemalesMalesFemales
roe deer
Capreolus capreolus		Poland/
Slovakia		2014-
-		-
-
red deer
Cervus elaphus		Poland1516--
fallow deer
Dama dama		Poland4---
Cattle
Bos taurus		Poland
Germany		-
20		-
14		12
20		16
16
Table
Table 2. Measurements of Ostertagia leptospicularis derived from different host species (presented in micrometers unless indicated otherwise and given as a range followed by the mean ± SD in parentheses; values in rows with the same letters differ significantly).
Table 2. Measurements of Ostertagia leptospicularis derived from different host species (presented in micrometers unless indicated otherwise and given as a range followed by the mean ± SD in parentheses; values in rows with the same letters differ significantly).
Characteristics
of Nematode Specimens		Male Specimens Derived fromFemale Specimens Derived from
Roe Deer
Capreolus capreolus		Red Deer
Cervus elaphus		Fallow Deer
Dama ama		Cattle
Bos taurus		Roe Deer
Capreolus capreolus		Red Deer
Cervus elaphus		Cattle
Bos taurus
n = 20n = 15n = 4n = 20n = 14n = 16n = 14
BodyTotal length5984.4–7485.2
(6684.4 ± 447.3)		6245.3–7888.7
(7063.3 A ± 523.1)		6905–7425.5
(7144.1 ± 216.8)		5905.9–6976.1
(6519.8 A ± 326.1)		7752–11,736.6
(9478.8 A ± 1051.1)		7374.2–9038.1
(8187.1 AB ± 563.1)		9259.4–12,108.4
(10,436.6 B ± 793.8)
EsophagusTotal length707.5–803.6
(772.1 ± 29.3)		705.2–898.9,
(766.7 ± 51.3)		711.8–812.3
(762.9 ± 44.5)		645.1–818.4
(764.9 ± 43.5)		699.7–848.8
(788.8 A ± 40.2)		705.5–819.6
(766.2 B ± 36)		765.9–908.9
(847.9 AB ± 43.5)
Intestinal valve length117.5–168.4
(133 A ± 12.7)		101.9–131.4
(111.8 AB ± 7.8)		119.8–127.5
(123.8 ± 3.3)		111.4–176.4
(134.8 B ± 19.6)		103.9–133.5
(115.6 A ± 9.4)		101.6–124.5
(115.4 B ± 7.1)		131.7–176
(157 AB ± 13.4)
Intestinal valve width22.4–53
(34.4 A ± 9)		15.8–32.5
(25.2 AB ± 4)		29.4–35.9
(33.2 ± 2.8)		28.1–46.9
(39 B ± 6.1)		23.1–37
(29.9 A ± 4.2)		23.1–34
(28.5 B ± 3)		34.9–52.4
(43.1 AB ± 5)
Bursa copulatorixSpicule left (length)163.9–209.1
(183.3 A ± 11.3)		166.4–169.5
(178.7 B ± 9.1)		177.2–182.3
(179.4 ± 2.3)		148.6–177.5
(165.1 AB ± 8.2)		---
Trifurcation (length)32.3–48.5
(40.4 ± 4.5)		35.7–45.5
(40.4 ± 2.6)		40.1–42.4
(41.3 ± 1.1)		35.1–45.2
(40.5 ± 2.6)		---
Spicule left
(% trifurcation)		75.3–82.1
(78 ± 1.6)		75.4–79.6
(77.4 ± 1.2)		76.2–78
(77 ± 0.8)		73.2–78.4
(75.5 ± 1.4)		---
Spicule right (length)163.2–205.4
(178.6 A ± 12.1)		161.9–193.8
(174.3 B ± 9.5)		170.4–177.8
(174 ± 3.6)		143–172.3
(159.6 AB ± 8.8)		---
Trifurcation (length)29.6–49.7
(35.5 ± 4.9)		25.6–39.7
(33.8 ± 3.8)		33.4–38.4
(36.5 ± 2.1)		29.3–37.8
(33.9 ± 2.7)		---
Spicule right
(% trifurcation)		75.8–88.8
(80.2 ± 1.7)		78.7–84.7
(80.6 ± 1.6)		78.4–80.4
(79.1 ± 0.9)		76.3–81.6
(78.9 ± 2.7)		---
Sjöberg’s organabsentabsentabsentabsent---
Bursal ray pattern2-1-22-1-22-1-22-1-2---
OvijectorTotal length----172.8–282.1
(207.8 AB ± 27.7)		158.4–228.7
(181.7 B ± 18)		113.7–193.2
(164.3 A ± 19)
TailTotal length----145.1–183.2
(160.8 Ab ± 13.4)		132.7–162.8
(149.8 bC ± 10.8)		179.7–207.3
(190.8 AC ± 9.5)
A, B, C values in rows with the same letters differ significantly at p < 0.01. b values in rows with the same letters differ significantly at p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Measurements of Ostertagia ostertagi derived from cattle (Bos taurus)—its principal host (presented in micrometers unless indicated otherwise and given as a range followed by the mean ± SD in parentheses; values in rows with the same letters differ significantly at p < 0.01).
Table 3. Measurements of Ostertagia ostertagi derived from cattle (Bos taurus)—its principal host (presented in micrometers unless indicated otherwise and given as a range followed by the mean ± SD in parentheses; values in rows with the same letters differ significantly at p < 0.01).
Characteristics
of Nematode Specimens		Male SpecimensFemale Specimens
n = 12 *n = 20 **n = 16 *n = 16 **
BodyTotal length5010.3–7701.3
(6567.9 ± 795.6)		5827.9–7890.6
(6867.3 ± 573.5)		9834.8–11,083.5
(10,349 A ± 389.5)		8676.9–11,236.1
(9753.4 A ± 615.1)
EsophagusTotal length575.6–710.1
(645.3 ± 40)		580.4–727.4
(649.3 ± 34.1)		654–766.3
(726.3 A ± 27.7)		642.2–745.5
(675.8 A ± 30.6)
Intestinal valve length50.9–67.8
(61.9 ± 5.1)		51.1–67.7
(58.3 ± 5.4)		54.6–82.3
(68.6 ± 10)		56.7–85.8
(66.1 ± 7.5)
Intestinal valve width33.5–58
(45 ± 8.8)		35.5–69.9
(47.1 ± 9)		40.1–64.3
(52.1 A ± 6)		47.7–71.4
(60.2 A ± 5.9)
Bursa copulatorixSpicule left (length)222.9–243
(233.6 ± 7)		215.8–249.6
(229 ± 7.7)		--
Trifurcation (length)50.8–63.1
(57.5 ± 3.1)		51.9–62.5
(57.8 ± 3.2)		--
Spicule left
(% trifurcation)		73.5–77.2
(75.4 ± 1)		73.3–77
(74.8 ± 1.2)		--
Spicule right (length)216.9–242.2
(232 ± 8.1)		215.3–249.4
(227.6 ± 7.5)		--
Trifurcation (length)51.1–65.1
(58.9 ± 3.5)		54.2–65.3
(59.3 ± 3.3)		--
Spicule right
(% trifurcation)		72.2–76.9
(74.6 ± 1.2)		72–76.1
(74 ± 1.3)		--
Sjöberg’s organabsentabsent--
Bursal ray pattern2-1-22-1-2--
OvijectorTotal length--224.9–318
(273.1 A ± 23.4)		219.1–274.5
(247.6 A ± 17.2)
TailTotal length--119.6–159.7
(138.5 ± 13.1)		121.9–154.4
(141.5 ± 9.8)
* origin: Poland; ** origin: Germany.
Table
Table 4. Number of longitudinal cuticular ridges of nematodes in relation to host species.
Table 4. Number of longitudinal cuticular ridges of nematodes in relation to host species.
Characteristics
of Nematode Specimens		Ostertagia leptospicularisOstertagia ostertagi *
Male Specimens (n = 27)
Derived from		Female Specimens (n = 10) Derived fromMale SpecimensDerived from Female Specimens
Derived from
Roe Deer
Capreolus capreolus		Red Deer
Cervus elaphus		Cattle
Bos taurus		Roe Deer
Capreolus capreolus		Cattle
Bos taurus		Cattle
Bos taurus
n = 10n = 8n = 9n = 5n = 5n = 21n = 13
Cuticular ridgesesophageal-intestinal junction (EIJ)35–36363635–363633–4034–39
midbody32–3532–3629–3429–3229–3033–3930–36
spicules30–3429–3229–32--26–31-
* origin: Germany.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wyrobisz-Papiewska, A.; Kowal, J.; Łopieńska-Biernat, E.; Nosal, P.; Polak, I.; Paukszto, Ł.; Rehbein, S. Morphometric and Molecular Analyses of Ostertagia leptospicularis Assadov, 1953 from Ruminants: Species Diversity or Host Influence? Animals 2021, 11, 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010182

AMA Style

Wyrobisz-Papiewska A, Kowal J, Łopieńska-Biernat E, Nosal P, Polak I, Paukszto Ł, Rehbein S. Morphometric and Molecular Analyses of Ostertagia leptospicularis Assadov, 1953 from Ruminants: Species Diversity or Host Influence? Animals. 2021; 11(1):182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wyrobisz-Papiewska, Anna, Jerzy Kowal, Elżbieta Łopieńska-Biernat, Paweł Nosal, Iwona Polak, Łukasz Paukszto, and Steffen Rehbein. 2021. "Morphometric and Molecular Analyses of Ostertagia leptospicularis Assadov, 1953 from Ruminants: Species Diversity or Host Influence?" Animals 11, no. 1: 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010182

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop