1. Introduction
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are critical for some sperm functions, such as sperm capacitation [
1]. However, ROS causes 30% to 80% of male subfertility cases when they exceed the body’s antioxidant capacity [
1]. Testicles cells divide at a high rate, consume a high amount of mitochondrial oxygen, and testicles tissues have a high level of unsaturated fatty acids which leave the male reproductive system susceptible to oxidative stress [
2]. As a consequence of oxidative stress, ROS may reduce sperm motility and damage the DNA and plasma membrane [
3,
4]. Antioxidant supplementation is suggested as a tool to break down the oxidative chain reaction and improve the process of spermatogenesis and thereby the sperm quality and general testicles health [
1,
2]. Numerous antioxidants are proposed to achieve that goal, such as vitamin E, vitamin C, selenium, glutathione, and coenzyme Q10 [
5,
6]. Although such antioxidants in most cases are expensive and artificial, cheap natural plant antioxidants sources are abundant. A polyflavonoid derived from chains of flavan-3-ol molecules, condensed tannin, represents an inexpensive and promising antioxidant source [
7]. For instance, the tannin-rich grape pomace concentrate has shown antioxidant activity equal to vitamin E when it was supplemented into the chicken’s diet [
8]. Condensed tannins, extracted from
Ficus altissima leaves, had protected plasmid DNA and cell against oxidative damage [
9]. The addition of commercial tannins extracted from chestnut to the diet of heat-stressed lambs had improved the meat quality and oxidative status of those lambs [
10]. The supplementation of tannin-rich
Ficus infectoria leaf meal had improved the antioxidant status, daily gain and immunity in lambs [
11]. However, the potential of tannins to serve as antioxidants must be balanced against their potential to diminish nutrient digestibility and feed intake of the animal [
12]. Those negative responses relate to the bitterness and the high tendency of tannin to bind with dietary ruminal protein when a high concentration is consumed [
12,
13,
14]. These limitations can be controlled by reducing the amount of tannin in the diet or/and slowing its release rate in the digestive tract by mean of encapsulation [
14]. The encapsulation technique may slow the rate of tannin extract release in the ruminant, prolonging its antioxidant activity. The supplementation of tannin extract should not exceed 0.3 g/kg bodyweight/day (g/kg BW/d) since higher levels may decrease the feed intake and digestibility [
15,
16]. In South Africa, tannin is mainly extracted from the bark of
Acacia mearnsii, which is one of the richest sources of tannin [
17]. We hypothesised that supplementation of tannin extract would enhance the oxidative status and, thereby, the reproductive performance of the rams. The main objective of this study is to investigate the supplementation effects of
Acacia mearnsii tannin extract (TE) and encapsulated tannin extract (ETE) on testicular measurements, semen quality, hormonal status, and oxidative status of South African Mutton Merino rams.
Seasonality of reproduction affects the productivity of small ruminants [
18]. Photoperiod is the key factor that influences the seasonal effects on the reproduction performance of the rams at high latitudes [
19]. However, at lower latitudes, the effect of season on reproduction becomes less and a greater effect for nutrition arises [
19]. In addition, besides the individual differences, there are major differences between the breeds in the length of the breeding season and sexual activity [
20]. Therefore, the effect of season on testicular measurements and semen quality has been investigated in numerous sheep breeds [
21]. As a secondary objective, we aimed to evaluate seasonal variations in the testicular measurements of South African Mutton Merino rams during the transition from autumn to winter. Correlation coefficients between bodyweight, some testicular measurements (testicular volume and scrotal circumference), semen quality parameter (semen volume, sperm concentration, pH, mass motility, progressive motility, viability, acrosome integrity), and hormonal status variables (testosterone and cortisol) are also reported in this study.
3. Results and Discussion
Experimental groups were not significantly different in their initial bodyweight, testicular parameters, semen volume, pH, colour, sperm concentration, mass motility, and progressive motility (
Table A1). Data on the effect of season and treatments on bodyweight and testicular measurements are presented in
Table 1. No significant interactions between treatments and seasons on testicular measurements were found. We observed a significant seasonal effect on the testicular measurements of the rams (
Table 1). Mean values of scrotal circumference, testicular volume, testicular width, and testicular length were significantly higher in autumn than those in winter. Authors in previous studies found a similar significant effect for the season on the testicular measurements [
32,
33,
34]. Level of nutrition, daily body growth, and the response of the pineal gland to the day length are the main factors that affect testicular measurements [
33]. In this study, the level of nutrition and body growth seems not to be the cause of the observed effect of season on testicular measurements, since the means of bodyweight remind almost the same between the two seasons (
Table 1). The longest day in Pretoria was during December and the length of the day starts to decrease during January and February until it gradually becomes the shortest days during June and July [
35]. It is, therefore, concluded that the decreasing day length resulted in the secretion of melatonin from the pineal gland [
36] which led to increased testicular measurements via the control of the LH and FSH secretion from the pituitary gland [
37]. Moreover, we found a significant positive correlation between average ambient temperature and testicular volume (
) together with scrotal circumference (
), which support the assumption of the seasonal effect on the testicular measurements. Bodyweight and testicular measurements were not affected by the treatments, except for the testicular length (
0.04). The group supplemented with 3 g ETE had a higher testicular length as compared to animals supplemented with 3 g TE and 1.5 ETE (
Table 1). Some studies found a positive effect of antioxidant supplementation on the testicular length on rams [
38] and goat bucks [
39], while others reported no effect on rams [
40] and goat bucks [
6]. The positive effect of 3 g ETE supplementation on testicular length might be due to its antioxidants properties since the encapsulation process slows and maintains constant release of the tannin microparticles [
14]. The variations in reports could be attributed to the differences in the level and duration of the supplementation, and the type of antioxidants used.
Results for the effects of supplementation treatments on semen quality are presented in
Table 2. The treatments have a significant effect on semen volume (
) and sperm concentration (
). The groups supplemented with 1.5 g TE and 3 g ETE had a higher semen volume as compared to the group supplemented with 3 g TE and a higher sperm concentration as compared to the group supplemented with 1.5 ETE (
Table 2). Similar improvements in semen volume and sperm concentration have been reported when antioxidants are supplemented in rams [
41,
42], goat bucks [
43], and rabbits [
44]. However, some authors reported no effect of antioxidant supplementation on the semen volume and sperm concentration in rams [
45,
46] and bulls [
47]. Different results following the supplementation with antioxidants on semen volume and sperm concentration could be referred to the variations in the level or the duration of supplementation and the antioxidant type used. Since antioxidants presence increase spermatogenesis [
44], the positive effects of 1.5 g TE and 3 g ETE on semen volume and sperm concentration in the present study can be attributed to the potential antioxidant activity in tannin extract. The supplementation with TE and ETE had no significant effect on semen pH and colour (
Table 2). In both subjective and objective evaluations, the sperm motility parameters were not influenced by the supplementation treatments, except for the percentages of slow motility (
) and non-progressive motility (
). The group supplemented with 3 g ETE had lower percentages of the slow and non-progressive motility spermatozoa as compared to the control, 1.5 ETE and 3 g TE groups. The positive effects of supplementation with antioxidants on sperm motility have been reported in several studies [
42,
48,
49]. The mode of action for the improvement of sperm motility after antioxidant supplementations is still under investigation [
50]. However, according to Zhu et al. [
51] and the recent review of Barbagallo et al. [
50], the antioxidants protect the gene expression system of the spermatozoa from ROS and, thus, maintain ATP generation in the mitochondria, which is important to fuel sperm linear motility [
51]. Therefore, the encapsulation of a higher level of tannin extract (3 g ETE) could maintain the antioxidants release, which may protect the ATP generation system in the spermatozoa and thus results in better sperm motility.
The effects of supplementation treatments on sperm viability, acrosome integrity, and abnormality are presented in
Table 3. The supplementation treatments did not affect sperm viability (
) and acrosome integrity (
). However, the supplementation treatments had a significant influence on the sperm total abnormality percentage (
Table 3). Rams supplemented with 1.5 g ETE, 3 g ETE, and 1.5 g TE had lower abnormal sperm percentages as compared to those supplemented with 3 g TE. The percentages of the sperm head, midpiece, and tail abnormality were not affected by the supplementation treatment (
and
, respectively), but the sperm cytoplasmic droplet percentage did (
). The group supplemented with 3 g TE had the highest sperm cytoplasmic droplet percentage. The sperm cytoplasmic droplet is the remnant formed after the phagocytosis of germ cells cytoplasm by the Sertoli cells during spermatogenesis [
52]. Incidence of sperm cytoplasmic droplets and disrupted sperm morphology are considered prime features of anomalous spermatozoa leading to oxidative stress in the spermatozoa [
53]. In rams, phospholipid-binding protein (PBP) is believed to induce the release of cytoplasmic droplets from epididymal sperm cells during spermatogenesis [
54]. The synthesis of PBP was positively associated with the increased level of testosterone in the blood plasma [
55]. However, the plasma testosterone level in this study was not affected by the supplementation treatments (
Figure 1), it is, therefore, difficult to explain the higher sperm cytoplasmic droplet present in the rams supplemented with 3 g TE.
The effects of supplementation treatments and time (day zero, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks) on the level of male hormone (testosterone), the stress hormone (cortisol) and oxidative status are presented in
Figure 1. The supplementation treatments did not affect the oxidative status, testosterone and cortisol. However, despite the research done so far, the mechanism of action that tannins exert on animal tissues is still unknown [
56]. The potential antioxidant effect might be a process that took place at the cellular level of the testicles and, therefore, was not detectable in the blood. Future works may consider measuring the oxidative status of the semen or/and testicular tissue. It is worth mentioning here that the 3 g ETE treatment appeared to have the highest level of testosterone and the lowest level of cortisol, but, statistically, was not significant (
Figure 1). The plasma testosterone concentration was influenced by time, while the cortisol and the oxidative status were not. At week eight of the study period (
Figure 1), the testosterone concentration showed a significant arising trend (14.48 ± 1.00 ng/ml) as compared to day zero (10.28 ± 0.93 ng/ml) and week sixteen (10.44 ± 0.82 ng/ml). Meaning that the testosterone concentration was higher in the second half of autumn (week eight = May) as compared to the first half of autumn (day zero = April) and the end of winter (week sixteen = August). These findings are comparable to the data reported by Sarlos et al. where the plasma concentration of testosterone continued to increase during the first half of autumn until it reached the maximum in the second half and then dropped in winter [
57]. The seasonal fluctuations in the plasma testosterone concentration can be attributed to the changes in melatonin secretion due to variation in the daylight length [
58,
59]. Due to the regulating effect on the hypothalamus–pituitary–testicular axis, melatonin modulates the GnRH pulse activity, and gonadotropin and testosterone production [
58].
There were significant interactions between tannin type and tannin supplementation level for testicular length, semen volume, sperm concentration, and percentages of slow motility sperm, non-progressive motility sperm, and sperm with cytoplasmic droplet (
Table 4). In most cases, the group of TE at supplementation level of 1.5 g/d and the group of ETE at 3 g/d performed better in comparison with their counterparts (
Table 4).
The results in this study revealed an interesting dose-dependent effect of supplementation with TE and ETE on the reproductive performance of the rams. The increase in TE from 1.5 g to 3 g resulted in negative effects in semen volume and sperm morphology. However, on the opposite, the increase in ETE from 1.5 g to 3 g had positive effects on testicular length, sperm concentration and motility. The most likely reason for this disparity is the encapsulation process. As mentioned above, the encapsulation process slows and maintains the constant release of the tannin during the day [
14]. Thus, sufficient time may be provided for the environment inside the digestive tract to absorb and utilise the available tannin which could explain the beneficial effects of the supplementation with 3 g ETE. Whereas, in the case of the un-encapsulated tannin extract (TE), the tannin dissolves faster and becomes immediately available [
14]. Therefore, the high quantity of the dissolved un-encapsulated tannin (3 g TE) might have worked as an anti-nutritional factor that led to the observed negative effects, since the tannin may combine with the dietary proteins, carbohydrate and minerals and complex with the secreted enzymes and endogenous enzymes, thus diminishing the digestion process [
60,
61]. However, the low quantity of the dissolved un-encapsulated tannin (1.5 g TE) might be utilised as antioxidants and hence added its beneficial effects. It is crucial to note that the improvements due to supplementation with 1.5 g TE and 3 g ETE did not statistically differ from the control in most cases. This study is the first report on the effect of
Acacia mearnsii supplementation on the reproduction performance of rams. The daily supplements levels used in our study from TE or ETE were 1.5 g and 3 g per animal, which approximately represent 0.03 and 0.06 g/kg BW/day. These levels are low compared to the dietary tannin inclusion levels used to reduce enteric methane emissions in sheep [
62], since we used the amount that is far from the threshold level to identify the least amount of the tannin extract, which can enhance the oxidative status of the rams. As a result, levels higher than 0.06 g/kg BW/day and lower or equal to the threshold level (0.30–0.70 g/kg BW) [
15,
16,
63] were not covered in this study. Those high levels should be considered in future studies in an encapsulated form when provided to animals.
Table 5 shows correlation coefficients between bodyweight, testicular measurements (testicular volume and scrotal circumference), semen quality (semen volume, sperm concentration, pH, mass motility, progressive motility, viability, acrosome integrity), and hormonal status variables (testosterone and cortisol) in Merino rams. Only significant correlations (
) are discussed. Correlations above
are acceptable and considered to have moderate relationship and correlations above
are considered to have strong relationship. Bodyweight had a moderate significant correlation with testicular volume (
), scrotal circumference (
), and low but significant relationship with semen volume (
,
). These results of the positive correlation between bodyweight and testicular measurements agree with the reports from previous studies [
64,
65,
66,
67]. The correlation between testicular measurements and bodyweight could be because testicular measurements were relative to bodyweight when age was kept constant [
64,
67]. Testicular volume had a strong and significant correlation with scrotal circumference (0.728,
), moderate significant relationship with semen volume (
,
) and low but significant correlation with sperm concentration (
,
). In addition, the scrotal circumference was found to have a moderate and significant correlation with semen volume (
) besides low and significant association with sperm concentration (
,
) and cortisol concentration (0.295,
). The positive correlation between testicular measurements (testicular volume plus scrotal circumference) and semen parameters agree with previous studies [
65,
66,
68]. The positive correlation between testicular measurements and semen volume plus sperm concentration could be because seminiferous tubules and germinal cells approximately make-up over 90% of the testicles [
69]. The bigger testicles result in more seminiferous tubules and germinal cells which may increase semen production (volume) and sperm concentration [
70]. Semen volume showed a low and significant relationship with sperm concentration (
) and negative, low, and significant correlations with sperm viability (
,
) and sperm acrosome integrity (
,
). A similar positive correlation between semen volume and sperm concentration were reported in previous studies [
66,
71]. As the spermatogenesis increases, the sperm concentration and semen volume increase and vice versa [
72], which may explain the observed positive correlation between semen volume and sperm concentration. Sperm concentration had very low but significant relation with progressive motility (
,
). The positive relationship between sperm concentration and progressive motility agrees with the report of Darbandi et al. [
73]. Semen pH showed a low, negative but significant association with sperm mass motility and acrosome integrity. A significant negative correlation between sperm motility and semen pH had been reported in different species including sheep [
74], buffaloes [
75], and humans [
76]. The negative correlation between sperm mass motility and semen pH could probably be due to the observation that spermatozoa with high mass motility consume more energy (fructose) and produce more by-products, such as lactic acid [
77], which may drop the semen pH faster than those with low mass motility. Sperm mass motility had moderate significant correlations with progressive sperm motility (
) and sperm acrosome integrity (
,
) along with low but significant relationship with sperm viability (
,
). The moderate association between sperm mass motility and progressive motility agrees with the finding of Aller et al. [
78]. Very low but significant association were found between the progressive sperm motility and viability (
,
) plus sperm acrosome integrity (
,
). Sperm viability had a moderate positive correlation with sperm acrosome integrity (
). This could be because spermatozoa gradually lose their acrosome integrity when dies [
79]. The cortisol showed a moderate negative correlation with sperm mass motility (
,
), progressive motility (
,
), viability (
,
), and acrosome integrity (
,
). These negative correlations indicate an adverse effect of cortisol on semen quality parameters. This might be because the elevated level of cortisol reduces testosterone secretion [
80], which may negatively affect spermatogenesis and semen parameters, such as sperm motility and morphology [
81]. In addition, the cortisol leads to an increase in the reactive oxygen species (ROS) [
82] that may reduce sperm motility and damage the DNA and plasma membrane [
3,
4]. However, the negative correlation between cortisol and semen quality parameters seems to differ between the species, as a similar negative correlation was reported in humans [
83], while the stallion’s semen seems to be well protected against high levels of cortisol [
84].