Next Article in Journal
Settle Down! Ranging Behaviour Responses of Roe Deer to Different Capture and Release Methods
Next Article in Special Issue
A Preliminary Study on Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. Grown on Mannitol Salt Agar in European Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Hunted in Campania Region—Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Microbial Biogeography along the Gastrointestinal Tract Segments of Sympatric Subterranean Rodents (Eospalax baileyi and Eospalax cansus)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prevalence of Infection with Porcine Circovirus Types 2 and 3 in the Wild Boar Population in the Campania Region (Southern Italy)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aujeszky’s Disease in South-Italian Wild Boars (Sus scrofa): A Serological Survey

1
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Delpino no. 1, 80137 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Largo Madonna delle Grazie 1, 80138 Napoli, Italy
3
Department of Animal Health, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, n. 2 Portici, 80055 Naples, Italy
4
Department of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Fisciano, 84084 Salerno, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(11), 3298; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113298
Submission received: 6 October 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Aujeszky’s disease (AD, pseudorabies) is a viral disease of suids caused by Suid Herpesvirus 1 (SHV-1) also referred as Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV) or Pseudorabies virus (PRV). The aim of our study was to evaluate seroprevalence of AD in wild boar hunted in the Campania Region, during the 2016–2017 hunting season. A total of 503 serum samples from wild boars hunted in the provinces of Campania Region were tested for antibody against ADV using an ELISA assay. A Seroprevalence of 23.85% (120/503, 95% Confidence Interval (CI 95%: 20.15–27.55) was found. Gender was not significantly associated with of ADV seropositivity (p > 0.05), while the presence of ADV antibodies was statistically associated with age (>36-month, p < 0.0001) and location (Avellino, p = 0.0161).

Abstract

Aujeszky’s disease (AD, pseudorabies) is a viral disease of suids caused by Suid Herpesvirus 1 (SHV-1) also referred as Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV) or Pseudorabies virus (ADV). Domestic pig and Wild boar (Sus scrofa) are the natural host, but many species can be infected with ADV. The aim of our study was to evaluate seroprevalence of AD in wild boar hunted in the Campania Region, during the 2016–2017 hunting season. A total of 503 serum samples from wild boars hunted in the provinces of Campania Region (Southern Italy) were collected and were tested for antibody against ADV using an AD, blocking ELISA assay. A Seroprevalence of 23.85% (120/503, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 20.15–27.55) was found. Gender was not significantly associated with of ADV seropositivity (p > 0.05), while the presence of ADV antibodies was statistically associated with age (>36-month, p < 0.0001) and location (Avellino, p = 0.0161). Our prevalence values are like those obtained in 2010 in our laboratory (30.7%), demonstrating a constant circulation of ADV in the area.

1. Introduction

Pseudorabies (PR), also known as Aujeszky’s disease (AD), is a viral disease that affects Suidae and causes significant damage to the pig industry worldwide, with increased mortality in piglet and abortion in sows, while adult pigs usually heal after infection [1,2]. The severity of the disease depends on age of the host and the virulence of the viral strain involved in the outbreak.
The causative agent of AD is Suid Herpevirus 1 (SHV-1) also known as Aujeszky’s disease (ADV), or Pseudorabies virus (PRV), a neurotropic virus, which belongs to the genus Varicellovirus, subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae, family Herpesviridae. Its host range is wide and includes several species that are members of the suidae family, both domestic and wild animals, which are the unique hosts able to develop a productive infection and can act as reservoirs for ADV [3]. In fact, suidae are the only known reservoirs and natural hosts of Aujeszky’s disease, while several mammals are susceptible to infections as blind-end hosts [3]. Concern on ADV infection in humans as arises, due to occasional controversial cases of encephalitis described in the literature, diagnosed on the basis of clinical symptoms, history of contact with animals and/or detection of antibodies [4,5,6]. The virus, similarly to other Herpesvirus, can establish a latent infection in pigs, the reactivation of which can occur after natural stimuli or because of stress factors [3].
As is known, wild animals can be reservoirs and spreaders of infections to livestock [7], in this context the wild boar-domestic pig interface represents an example of this interaction. In fact, wild and domestic suidae are affected by infectious and parasitic diseases that can shift from one species to the other [1]. AD is one of these infectious diseases, and this infection in wild boars is widespread worldwide with different prevalence rates [8]. However, additional information is needed to better understand the actual risk posed by latent infected wild swine as amplifiers of multi-host pathogens that may affect native wildlife as well as domestic animals.
In Italy and in all EU countries, an eradication plan is in place, including large-scale mandatory vaccination with delete-gE vaccines (first vaccination between 60 and 90 days of age), application of additional guarantees for pig movements between Member States [9] with increased efforts to control the disease. Pigs can be dispatched from any Member State to any other if the conditions laid down in Decision 2008/185/EC [9] are respected. These conditions are under the control of the Member State of origin and are more stringent for movements of pigs to a Member State with a higher animal health status [9]. This strategy has led to a decrease in the incidence and prevalence of the pseudorabies in Italy and in several European Union (EU) Member States [10].
In Italy the national AD control program, which provides for mandatory vaccination with delete-gE vaccines was started in 1997 [11] and together with the community provisions in force about AD eradication [9] resulted in a significant reduction in the incidence and prevalence of the disease, but AD has not yet been eradicated [12].
In fact, currently, in the Campania region, the prevalence of AD at herd and animal level is 0.5% and 0.05%, respectively; unfortunately, the ADV seems to be still present in feral pigs [13].
In Italy, there are no national plans for the control and/or eradication of pseudorabies in wild boars. The Italian regions establish programs and draw up regional plans for the surveillance of infectious diseases of wildlife, based on the characteristics of the territory.
The presence of wild suidae can compromise the success of the disease eradication plans [14]. In fact, wild boars may be maintenance or spill-over hosts in the AD epidemiology and can reintroduce infection to domestic pigs. Consequently, the control of infectious diseases in species, such as the Eurasian wild boars (Sus scrofa) is desirable, especially in areas such as Europe where, in recent years, this species has spread [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. In fact, in recent decades, the European wild boar population has been raised steadily [16,17,18]; also in Italy, the number of wild boars has significantly increased with a consequent expansion of the colonized areas. This scenario is due to the modification of the habitat of this species, in fact, wild boars are now present in the plains, on the hills and in the mountainous areas and the presence of wild animals was also observed on the outskirts of urban areas [19].
The growth of the wild boar population has led to an increase in the probability of contact between wild and domestic pigs with a consequent increase in the possible transmission of infectious diseases between the two species.
Italy is extremely rich in biodiversity; it has the highest number and density of animal and plant species within the European Union, as well as a high rate of endemism. The extension of the Italian territory over about 10° of latitude and the simultaneous presence of coastal, hilly, and mountainous environments determined the presence of ecological niches, close in space but very different from each other.
In this scenario, Campania is one of the Italian regions with the highest biodiversity. In fact, about 27% of the region is included among the protect areas, for a total of 367,548 hectares. The fauna is characterized by marten (Martes martes), Eurasian badger (Meles meles), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), few wolves (Canis lupus), and especially wild boars.
For this reason, we have selected the Campania for our serosurvey. In fact, the aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of AD in wild boars in the Campania region of Italy and compare our results with its correlation with age, gender, and location of hunting and with results obtained in our previous study in the same area in 2010 [13].
Risk factors such as age, gender, and location have been chosen to consider the ethology of wild boar. Age, gender, and location are closely linked with geographical density of animals, which represents the major risk factor associated with ADV [20]. In fact, wild boars are naturally social animals, living in female-dominated sounders consisting of barren sows and mothers with young led by an old matriarch. Male boars leave their sounder at about a year of age, while females either remain with their mothers or establish new territories nearby. Subadult males may live in loosely knit groups, while adult and old males tend to be isolated outside the breeding season [21].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

Approval from the ethics committee was not required since no live animals were used for this study. In fact, the serum samples used in our work were provided by hunters with appropriate wild boar hunting licenses.

2.2. Study Area and Sampling

The Campania region is located on the south-western portion of the Italian Peninsula, with an area of 13,590 km2 (41°00′00″ N–14°30′00″ E) and a coastline of 350 km (217 mi) on the Tyrrhenian Sea. The region has a temperate Mediterranean climate along the coast and continental in the inland area.
Pigs are one of the most raised animals in the Campania region, in fact, there are about 22,200 pig farms, with a total of about 175,000 animals. About 96.5% of farms are small family farms, while fattening and breeding farms represent 2% and 1.5%, respectively [22].
The survey was conducted on 503 wild boar serum samples during the hunting season of 2016–2017.
A non-probabilistic sampling method (convenience sampling) was used in this study. Serum samples were taken from animals hunted in the wooded areas of municipalities belonging to the provinces of Avellino, Salerno, Benevento and Caserta, considering the hunting tradition of the individual areas.
The animals were hunted according to standard wild boar hunting procedures and transported to a central processing site for cleaning, slaughtering and sampling procedures. We collected 1–3 cm3 of whole blood via heart puncture or cranial sinus puncture. Blood samples were centrifuged at 1100× g for 15 min and frozen at −80 °C until testing [23]. For each sample, gender, age, hunting site, and date of collection were recorded. The age of the hunted wild boars was established by a tooth eruption pattern and the animals were classified into three age ranges: yearling (0–12 months); sub-adults (13–36 months); adults (>36 months) [24].

2.3. Serological Assay

The presence of antibodies against ADV was investigated using a commercial competitive enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (IDEXX ADV/ADV gB Antibody test kit), performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ELISA ADV/ADV gB Antibody test kit used ADV antigen-coated microwell plates and assessed the competition between antibodies present in the serum samples tested and a monoclonal anti-ADV gB monoclonal antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The absorbance at 650 nm, A (650), was measured using Glomax Multi Detection System multiwell plate reader (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

MedCalc Statistical Software version 16.4.3 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium; www.medcalc.org; accessed on 19 January 2021) was used for statistical analysis. To compare the proportions of positivity relative to the dependent variables and to establish statistical significance within each class (age, gender, and location), the chi-square test was used.
Binary logistic models were applied to the variables (age, gender, location) associated with the seroprevalence for ADV using JMP version 14.1.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). p < 0.05 was considered significant. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to quantify the significant differences between the categories.

3. Results

In our study, 503 wild boar serum samples were tested, collected in 119 hunting areas in the 4 provinces of the Campania Region (Figure 1).
The age group between 13 and 36 months (44.3%) was the more represented, followed by the age classes 0–12 (31.6%) and >36 (24.1%). There were 302 males (60%) and 201 females (40%). The province of Salerno provided the largest number of samples (61.6%, n = 310), followed by Avellino (20.4%, n = 103), Benevento (15.5%, n = 78) and Caserta (2.4%, n = 12).
A total of 120 out of 503 serum samples tested (23.85%; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 20.15–27.55) were positive to competitive ELISA for ADV antibodies (Table 1). The univariate and multivariate analyses results showed a statistical association between age (Chi-square test: DF = 2, n = 503, p-value = 0.000069) and location (Chi-square test: DF = 3, n = 503, p-value = 0.0161 (Table 1). In particular, wild boars over 36 months of age showed a higher probability of ADV seropositivity than younger animals with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.2 (CI 95% 1.8–5.7) and 1.9 (CI 95% 1.2–3.2), respectively, versus 0–12 and 13–36 months old.
A risk of ADV seropositivity was significantly correlated with the Avellino Province (34.0%, CI 95% 25.2–42.9) with OR of 1.7 (CI 95% 1.04–2.8), 2.5 (CI 95% 0.5–12.3), and 3.1 (CI 95% 1.5–6.7), respectively, versus Salerno, Caserta, and Benevento Provinces (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Pseudorabies is an endemic disease affecting wild boars in many parts of the world [25,26]. The increase in the wild animal population, such as wild boars, in many parts of Europe represents a risk factor for diseases shared between wildlife and livestock [27]. Consequently, wildlife health surveillance has become a problem of national and international interest, in particular regarding infectious diseases under eradication and control plans, such as ADV, and involving both wild animals and livestock.
The seroprevalence of pseudorabies in wild boars was 23.85% (120/503, 95% CI: 20.15–27.55), our data should be compared with the value of a similar survey conducted in Campania during the hunting season 2005–2006 (30.7%) showing a slight decrease in the prevalence of pseudorabies in the wild swine population [13]. Previous surveys conducted in Italy show that the ADV prevalence found in our study is slightly lower than the value found in studies performed in Tuscany (28.60%) [28], in the North-West regions of Italy (30.39%) [29] and central Italy (30.9%) [30]. Taken together, these data show that ADV seroprevalence is roughly constant in Italian wild boar population for a long time [13,28,29,30] and that ADV is more common in this species than we thought.
The overall ADV seroprevalence of 23.85% (95% CI: 20.15–27.55) in wild boar in Campania Region, for the time period 2016–2017 is lower than values reported for ADV in feral swine populations, in other European Country, such us Czech Republic (30%), Slovenia (26%), Greece (35.1%), Spain (from 12.7% to 57.7%), and Turkey (69.9%) [31,32,33,34,35]. On the other hand, lower prevalence values were found in France (from 0% to 18.4%), Poland (8.7%), Germany (12.09%), Belgium (18.1%), and Swiss (0.57%) [36,37,38,39,40].
However, caution is needed when comparing seroprevalence values obtained from different diagnostic tests, with various sampling methods and in several geographic areas. In fact, all these variables can influence the results of the serosurvey and overestimate or underestimate the impact of infectious diseases in the wild fauna.
Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated a correlation between age, location, and positivity to ADV.
Our study a higher infection rates have been found in wild boars over 36 months of age (38%) than in animal of 0–12 (15.1%) and 13–36 (22.4%) months old with an OR versus 36 months of 3.2 and 1.9, respectively. Our results agree with other survey conducted in Italy and in other European country, that show that antibody prevalence in wild swine is correlated with age [10,29,30,32,34,41].
Several surveys have observed a higher ADV exposure in females compared to males [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], leading us to theorize that spread inside maternal groups occur more frequently. In our study, there is not statistically association between gender and ADV positivity, though female show the highest prevalence value (26.4%). Maybe a bigger sample would give more precise statistical results, but this was not possible in our study, nevertheless a possible explanation of this trend is the change in the composition of the wild boar population due to the hunting pressure, the expansion of the species, and the ethology of the wild boar [15]. In fact, as previously said, in wild boar, the contact between adult females and young animals is more probable than among male adults. Wild boars are typically gregarious swine, living in clusters consisting of a dominant matriarch, sows, and mothers with piglets. Joung male leave the group at 8–15 months old and tend to be isolated out of the breeding season, while females remain with their mothers or create new groups [21].
Furthermore, a high seroprevalence was found in animals living in the province of Avellino (34.0%), followed by Salerno (23.2%), Caserta (16.7%), and Benevento (14.1%). Avellino location is a risk factor for ADV seropositivity with an OR of 1.7, 2.5, and 3.1, respectively, versus Salerno, Caserta, and Benevento province. This scenario reflects the distribution of the wild boars in Campania region, in fact Avellino is the province with the largest population of wild boars, followed by Salerno, Caserta and Benevento [42].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our data confirms that wild boar populations, in Campania Region, is not free from Aujeszky’s disease. In fact, looks endemic in Campania, in agreement with what has been described in the other region of Italy and in Europe.
Thus, Aujeszky’s disease in wild swine appears to be a source of infection for domestic pigs, as well as domestic and wild carnivores. Therefore, serosurvey to detect specific antibody to ADV, especially for endemic disease, are highly recommended and our data indicates the necessity for the continuance of this type of serosurvey aiming to assess and monitoring the prevalence of ADV infection among wild boars.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M. and U.P.; methodology, G.F., F.D.; software, S.M.; validation, G.F., S.M.; formal analysis, S.M.; investigation, F.D., C.L.; resources, N.D., M.G.A.; data curation, S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.F., S.M.; writing—review and editing, S.M., S.D.; visualization, V.I., G.I.; supervision, R.C.; funding acquisition, U.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge G. Marzatico for technical contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Boadella, M.; Gortázar, C.; Vicente, J.; Ruiz-Fons, F. Wild boar: An increasing concern for Aujeszky’s disease control in pigs? BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 17, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mare, C.J.; Zierke, A.V.; Gustafson, D.P. Pseudorabies in Swine; Colorado State University Extension Service: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pensaert, M.B.; Kluge, P. Pseudorabies virus (Aujeszky’s disease). In Virus Infections of Porcines; Pensaert, M.B., Ed.; Elsevier Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1989; pp. 39–64. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anusz, Z.; Szweda, W.; Popko, J.; Trybała, E. Is Aujeszky’s disease a zoonosis? Przegl. Epidemiol. 1992, 46, 181–186. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Skinner, G.R.; Ahmad, A.; Davies, J.A. The infrequency of transmission of herpesviruses between humans and animals; postulation of an unrecognized protective host mechanism. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2001, 24, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Xie, C.; Ding, S.; Yang, H.; Guo, S.; Li, J.; Qin, L.; Ban, F.; Wang, D.; et al. A novel human acute encephalitis caused by pseudorabies virus variant strain. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 15, ciaa987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gortazar, C.; Ferroglio, E.; Hofle, U.; Frolich, K.; Vicente, J. Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: A European perspective. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2007, 53, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ruiz-Fons, F.; Segalés, J.; Gortázar, C. A review of viral diseases of the European wild boar: Effects of population dynamics and reservoir role. Vet. J. 2008, 176, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Commission Decision of 21 February 2008 on Additional Guarantees in Intra-Community Trade of Pigs Relating to Aujeszky’s Disease and Criteria to Provide Information on this Disease (2008/185/EC). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2008/185/2015-03-11 (accessed on 2 March 2021).
  10. Pannwitz, G.; Freuling, C.; Denzin, N.; Schaarschmidt, U.; Nieper, H.; Hlinak, A.; Burkhardt, S.; Klopries, M.; Dedek, J.; Hoffmann, L.; et al. A long-term serological survey on Aujeszky’s disease virus infections in wild boar in East Germany. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012, 140, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Decreto Ministeriale 1 Aprile 1997: Piano Nazionale di Controllo Della Malattia di Aujeszky nella specie suina. G. U. R. I. 6 Maggio 1997, n. 103. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2011/02/12/11A01746/sg (accessed on 15 November 2021).
  12. Chiari, M.; Ferrari, N.; Bertoletti, M.; Avisani, D.; Cerioli, M.; Zanoni, M.; Alborali, L.G.; Lanfranchi, P.; Lelli, D.; Martin, A.M.; et al. Long-Term Surveillance of Aujeszky’s Disease in the Alpine Wild Boar (Sus scrofa). Ecohealth 2015, 12, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Montagnaro, S.; Sasso, S.; De Martino, L.; Longo, M.; Iovane, V.; Ghiurmino, G.; Pisanelli, G.; Nava, D.; Baldi, L.; Pagnini, U. Prevalence of antibodies to selected viral and bacterial pathogens in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Campania Region, Italy. J. Wildl. Dis. 2010, 46, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zanella, G.; Durand, B.; Hars, J.; Moutou, F.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Duvauchelle, A.; Fermé, M.; Karoui, C.; Boschiroli, M.L. Mycobacterium bovis in wildlife in France. J. Wildl. Dis. 2008, 44, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Montagnaro, S.; D’Ambrosi, F.; Petruccelli, A.; Ferrara, G.; D’Alessio, N.; Iovane, V.; Veneziano, V.; Fioretti, A.; Pagnini, U. A Serological Survey of Brucellosis in Eurasian Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Campania Region, Italy. J. Wildl. Dis. 2020, 56, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Casades-Martí., L.; González-Barrio, D.; Royo-Hernández, L.; Díez-Delgado, I.; Ruiz-Fons, F. Dynamics of Aujeszky’s disease virus infection in wild boar in enzootic scenarios. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 388–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Briedermann, L.; Rethwisch, G. Schwarzwild—Quo Vadis? (Wild Boar—Quo Vadis?) HJC—Förderkreis—Jagdpolitik e.V. Schriftenreihe “Angewandter Naturschutz” des Verbandes Deutscher Naturland Stiftungen eV, 68; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  18. Leuenberger, R.; Boujon, P.; Thür, B.; Miserez, R.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Rüfenacht, J.; Stärk, K.D. Prevalence of classical swine fever, Aujeszky’s disease and brucellosis in a population of wild boar in Switzerland. Vet. Rec. 2007, 17, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Di Brita, A.; Miraglia, N.; Varuzza, P. Estimation of the Wild Boar Population in the Italian Apennines by Pellet Count Group Technic- A Pilot Study. J. Ecol. Nat. Resour. 2018, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  20. Weigel, R.M.; Austin, C.C.; Siegel, A.M.; Biehl, L.G.; Taft, A.C. Risk factors associated with the seroprevalence of pseudorabies virus in Illinois swine herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 1992, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marsan, A.; Mattioli, S. Il Cinghiale. In Il Piviere (Collana Fauna Selvatica. Biologia e Gestione); Il Piviere: San Casciano Val di Pesa, Italy, 2013; ISBN 978-88-96348-178. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  22. Decreto Ministeriale 04 agosto 2011: Piano di Controllo per L’eradicazione Della Malattia di Aujeszky Negli Allevamenti Suini Della Regione Camapania. Available online: http://www.oevcampania.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Allegato_187049.pdf (accessed on 5 March 2021).
  23. Petruccelli, A.; Zottola, T.; Ferrara, G.; Iovane, V.; Di Russo, C.; Pagnini, U.; Montagnaro, S. West Nile Virus and Related Flavivirus in European Wild Boar (Sus scrofa), Latium Region, Italy: A Retrospective Study. Animals 2020, 16, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Iovane, V.; Ferrara, G.; Petruccelli, A.; Veneziano, V.; D’Alessio, N.; Ciarcia, R.; Fioretti, A.; Pagnini, U.; Montagnaro, S. Prevalence of serum antibodies against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in wild boar in Campania region, Italy. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2020, 66, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Müller, T.; Hahn, E.C.; Tottewitz, F.; Kramer, M.; Klupp, B.G.; Mettenleiter, T.C.; Freuling, C. Pseudorabies virus in wild swine: A global perspective. Arch. Virol. 2011, 156, 1691–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pedersen, K.; Bevins, S.N.; Baroch, J.A.; Cumbee, J.C., Jr.; Chandler, S.C.; Woodruff, B.S.; Bigelow, T.T.; DeLiberto, T.J. Pseudorabies in feral swine in the United States, 2009–2012. J. Wildl. Dis. 2013, 49, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Gortázar, C.; Vicente, J.; Fierro, Y.; León, L.; Cubero, M.J.; González, M. Natural Aujeszky’s disease in a Spanish wild boar population. In Domestic Animal/Wildlife Interface: Issue for Disease Control, Conservation, Sustainable Food Production, and Emerging Diseases; Gibbs, E.P.J., Bokma, B.H., Eds.; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Wiley: Blackwell, OK, USA, 2020; pp. 210–212. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bertelloni, F.; Mazzei, M.; Cilia, G.; Forzan, M.; Felicioli, A.; Sagona, S.; Bandecchi, P.; Turchi, B.; Cerri, D.; Fratini, F. Serological Survey on Bacterial and Viral Pathogens in Wild Boars Hunted in Tuscany. Ecohealth 2020, 17, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Caruso, C.; Vitale, N.; Prato, R.; Radaelli, M.C.; Zoppi, S.; Possidente, R.; Dondo, A.; Chiavacci, L.; Moreno Martin, A.M.; Masoero, L. Pseudorabies virus in North-West Italian wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations: Prevalence and risk factors to support a territorial risk-based surveillance. Vet. Ital. 2018, 54, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Verin, R.; Varuzza, P.; Mazzei, M.; Poli, A. Serologic, molecular, and pathologic survey of pseudorabies virus infection in hunted wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Italy. J. Wildl. Dis. 2014, 50, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sedlak, K.; Bartova, E.; Machova, J. Antibodies to selected viral disease agents in wild boars from the Czech Republic. J. Wildl. Dis. 2008, 44, 777–780. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vengust, G.; Valencak, Z.; Bidovec, A. Presence of Antibodies against Aujeszky’s Disease Virus in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Slovenia. J. Wildl. Dis. 2005, 41, 800–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Touloudi, A.; Valiakos, G.; Athanasiou, L.V.; Birtsas, P.; Giannakopoulos, A.; Papaspyropoulos, K.; Kalaitzis, C.; Sokos, C.; Tsokana, C.N.; Spyrou, V.; et al. A serosurvey for selected pathogens in Greek European wild boar. Vet. Rec. Open 2015, 2, e000077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Müller, A.; Melo, N.; González-Barrio, D.; Pinto, M.V.; Ruiz-Fons, F. Aujeszky’s disease in hunted wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Iberian peninsula. J. Wildl. Dis. 2021, 57, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Albayrak, H.; Ozan, E.; Cavunt, A. A serological survey of selected pathogens in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in northern Turkey. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2013, 59, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Payne, A.; Rossi, S.; Lacour, S.A.; Vallée, I.; Garin-Bastuji, B.; Simon, G.; Hervé, S.; Pavio, N.; Richomme, C.; Dunoyer, C.; et al. Bilan sanitaire du sanglier vis-à-vis de la Trichinellose, de la maladie d’Aujeszky, de la brucellose, de l’hépatite E et des virus influenza porcins en France. Bull. Epidémiol. Santé Anim. Alim. 2011, 44, 2–8. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lipowski, A.; Szczotka-Bochniarz, A.; Pejsak, Z. Prevalence of Antibodies to Aujeszky’s Disease Virus in Wild Boar in Poland, Between 2011 and 2014: A Retrospective Study. J. Vet. Res. 2017, 61, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Denzin, N.; Borgwardt, J.; Freuling, C.; Müller, T. Spatio-temporal analysis of the progression of Aujeszky’s disease virus infection in wild boar of Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. Geospat. Health 2013, 8, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Czaplicki, G.; Dufey, J.; Saegerman, C. Is the Walloon European Wild boar a potential reservoir of Pseudorabies virus for porcine live stock? Epidemiol. Sante. Anim. 2006, 49, 89–101. [Google Scholar]
  40. Meier, R.K.; Ruiz-Fons, F.; Ryser-Degiorgis, M.P. A picture of trends in Aujeszky’s disease virus exposure in wild boar in the Swiss and European contexts. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Lari, A.; Lorenzi, D.; Nigrelli, D.; Brocchi, E.; Faccini, S.; Poli, A. Pseudorabies virus in European wild boar from central Italy. J. Wildl. Dis. 2006, 42, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Piano di Gestione e Controllo del Cinghiale in Regione Campania Territorio a Caccia Programmata, ai Sensi Della L.N. 157/92 (Piano TCP). Available online: http://www.agricoltura.regione.campania.it/foreste/cinghiale/PECC_Sintesi_non_tecnica.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2021).
Figure 1. Map of the Campania Region (Italy) showing the distribution of samples of Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) seropositive for Pseudorabies virus.
Figure 1. Map of the Campania Region (Italy) showing the distribution of samples of Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) seropositive for Pseudorabies virus.
Animals 11 03298 g001
Table 1. Seroprevalence of infection with ADV and risk factor analysis by age, gender and location in Wild Boars in the Campania Region as detected by competitive ELISA.
Table 1. Seroprevalence of infection with ADV and risk factor analysis by age, gender and location in Wild Boars in the Campania Region as detected by competitive ELISA.
FactornElisa Positive%ES%95%CIχ2pOR95%CIp
Total50312023.853.720.15–27.55---
Age
0–121592415.15.59.6–20.620.3290.0000693.21.8–5.7<0.0001
13–362235022.45.117.3–27.51.91.2–3.20.0065
>361214638.08.829.2–46.8Ref
Gender
Male3026722.24.617.6–26.80.9430.33140.80.5–1.20.2814
Female2015326.46.0420.36–32.4
Province
Salerno3107223.24.718.5–27.910.3060.01611.71.04–2.80.0319
Caserta12216.720.60−37.32.50.5–12.30.2386
Benevento781114.18.85.3–22.93.11.5–6.70.0031
Avellino1033534.08.925.2–42.9Ref
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferrara, G.; Longobardi, C.; D’Ambrosi, F.; Amoroso, M.G.; D’Alessio, N.; Damiano, S.; Ciarcia, R.; Iovane, V.; Iovane, G.; Pagnini, U.; et al. Aujeszky’s Disease in South-Italian Wild Boars (Sus scrofa): A Serological Survey. Animals 2021, 11, 3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113298

AMA Style

Ferrara G, Longobardi C, D’Ambrosi F, Amoroso MG, D’Alessio N, Damiano S, Ciarcia R, Iovane V, Iovane G, Pagnini U, et al. Aujeszky’s Disease in South-Italian Wild Boars (Sus scrofa): A Serological Survey. Animals. 2021; 11(11):3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferrara, Gianmarco, Consiglia Longobardi, Filomena D’Ambrosi, Maria Grazia Amoroso, Nicola D’Alessio, Sara Damiano, Roberto Ciarcia, Valentina Iovane, Giuseppe Iovane, Ugo Pagnini, and et al. 2021. "Aujeszky’s Disease in South-Italian Wild Boars (Sus scrofa): A Serological Survey" Animals 11, no. 11: 3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113298

APA Style

Ferrara, G., Longobardi, C., D’Ambrosi, F., Amoroso, M. G., D’Alessio, N., Damiano, S., Ciarcia, R., Iovane, V., Iovane, G., Pagnini, U., & Montagnaro, S. (2021). Aujeszky’s Disease in South-Italian Wild Boars (Sus scrofa): A Serological Survey. Animals, 11(11), 3298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113298

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop