The Usefulness of Sexual Behaviour Assessment at the Beginning of Service to Predict the Suitability of Boars for Artificial Insemination
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- At the start of the period during which there were semen collections (at the age of 7–8 months);
- Three months after the start of semen collections (at the age of 10–11 months);
- Six months after the start of semen collections (at the age of 13–14 months);
- Nine months after the start of semen collections (at the age of 16–17 months).
- Time from entering the arena until mounting the phantom;
- Time from mounting the phantom until achieving an erection;
- Time from achieving full erection until the start of ejaculation;
- Duration of ejaculation;
- Number of times the boar needed to mount the phantom in order to ejaculate.
- Time from entering the arena until achieving an erection;
- Time from entering the arena until the start of ejaculation;
- Duration of copulation, i.e., the total time from successfully mounting the phantom until dismounting the phantom after ejaculation was completed.
- Ejaculate volume (mL);
- Sperm concentration in the ejaculate (×103/mm3);
- Sperm motility, as the percentage of sperm with progressive movement (%);
- Number of motile sperm in the ejaculate (×109).
3. Results
3.1. Stage I
3.2. Stage II
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tsakmakidis, I.A.; Lymberopoulos, A.G.; Khalifa, T.A.A. Relationship between sperm quality traits and field-fertility of porcine semen. J. Vet. Sci. 2010, 11, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Frydrychová, S.; Opletal, L.; Macáková, K.; Lustyková, A.; Rozkot, M.; Lipenský, J. Effects of herbal preparation on libido and semen quality in boars. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2011, 46, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kowalewski, D.; Kondracki, S.; Górski, K.; Bajena, M.; Wysokińska, A. Effect of piggery microclimate on ejaculate performance of artificial insemination boars. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2016, 22, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemsworth, P.H.; Tilbrook, A.J. Sexual behavior of male pigs. Horm. Behav. 2007, 52, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levis, D.G.; Reicks, D.L. Assessment of sexual behavior and effect of semen collection pen design and sexual stimulation of boars on behavior and sperm output-a review. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kauffold, J.; Kessler, M.; Richter, A.; Beynon, N.; Wehrend, A. B-mode ultrasound and grey-scale analysis of the epididymis in boars, and the relationship to semen parameters. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2011, 46, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szostak, B.; Sarzyńska, J. The influence of the breed and age on the libido of insemination boars. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootechnica 2011, 10, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
- Kondracki, S.; Iwanina, M.; Wysokińska, A.; Górski, K. The use of sexual activity measurements to assess ejaculatory performance of boars. Arch. Tierz. 2013, 56, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pound, N.; Javed, M.H.; Ruberto, C.; Shaikh, M.A.; del Valle, A.P. Duration of sexual arousal predicts semen parameters for masturbatory ejaculates. Physiol. Behav. 2002, 76, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knox, R.; Levis, D.; Safranski, T.; Singleton, W. An update on North American boar stud practices. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 1202–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, G.J.; Macpherson, J.W. A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection. J. Anim. Sci. 1973, 36, 563–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, E.R.; Stefanick, M.L.; Clark, J.T.; Davidson, J.M. Hormones and sexual behavior in relationship to aging in male rats. Horm. Behav. 1992, 26, 110–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, Y.F.; Tsai, H.W.; Tai, M.Y. Variations in the sexual performance in old male rats. Zool. Stud. 1994, 33, 232–234. [Google Scholar]
- Lucio, R.A.; Tlachi-Lòpez, J.L.; Eguibar, J.R.; Ågmo, A. Sperm count and sperm motility decrease in old rats. Physiol. Behav. 2013, 110–111, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szostak, B.; Przykaza, Ł. The influence of breed, age of boars and exploitation season on their libido in conditions of the insemination station. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2011, 12, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, S.H.; See, M.T.; Long, T.E.; Galvin, J.M. Estimates of genetic correlations between production and semen traits in boar. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 19, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wysokińska, A.; Kondracki, S. Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two-breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2014, 14, 559–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Savić, R.; Petrović, M. Variability in ejaculation rate and libido of boars during reproductive exploitation. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 45, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Savić, R.; Marcos, R.; Petrović, M.; Radojković, D.; Radović, Č.; Gogić, M. Fertility of boars—What is important to know. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2017, 33, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pacheco, E.B.F.; Adegbeye, M.J.; Lagunas, B.C.; Salas, J.M.; Aguilar, A.S.; Heverastico, C.C. Effect of artificial insemination and natural mating on reproductive parameters in pigs of warm-humid climate region. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 90, 372–374. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P.; Kumar, N.; Thakur, D.S.; Patidar, A. Male hypogonadism: Symptoms and treatment. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2010, 1, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bilskis, R.; Sutkeviciene, N.; Riskeviciene, V.; Januskauskas, A.; Zilinskas, H. Effect of active immunization against GnRH on testosterone concentration, libido and sperm quality in mature AI boars. Acta Vet. Scand. 2012, 54, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Savić, R.; Petrović, M. Effect of photoperiod on sexual activity of boar. R. Bras. Zootec. 2015, 44, 276–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Savić, R.; Petrović, M.; Radojković, D.; Radović, Č.; Parunović, N. Libido and ejaculate traits of performance tested boars. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2014, 24, 1649–1654. [Google Scholar]
- Rehman, H.; Alhidary, I.A.; Khan, R.U.; Qureshi, M.S.; Sadique, U.; Khan, H.; Yaqoob, S.H. Relationship of age, breed and libido with semen traits of cattle bulls. Pak. J. Zool. 2016, 48, 1793–1798. [Google Scholar]
- López-Arjona, M.; Padilla, L.; Roca, J.; Cerón, J.J.; Martínez-Subiela, S. Ejaculate collection influences the salivary oxytocin concentrations in breeding male pigs. Animals 2020, 10, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okere, C.; Joseph, A.; Ezekwe, M. Seasonal and genotype variations in libido, semen production and quality in artificial insemination boars. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2005, 4, 885–888. [Google Scholar]
- Allrich, R.D.; Christenson, R.K.; Ford, J.J.; Zimmerman, D.R. Pubertal development of the boar: Age-related changes in testicular morphology and in vitro production of testosterone and estradiol-17β. Biol. Reprod. 1983, 28, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weiler, U.; Claus, R. Endocrine aspects of testicular function, especially hormones in the seminal plasma and their fate in the female reproductive tract: Testicular steroids and their relevance for male and reproductive functions. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 1991, 1, 41–61. [Google Scholar]
- Park, C.S.; Yi, Y.J. Comparison of semen characteristics, sperm freezability and testosterone concentration between Duroc and Yorkshire boars during seasons. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2002, 73, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smital, J. Effects influencing boar semen. Animal Reprod. Sci. 2009, 110, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolf, J.; Smital, J. Quantification of factors affecting semen traits in artificial insemination boars from animal model analyses. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 1620–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oberlender, G.; Murgas, L.D.S.; Zangeronimo, M.G.; Silva, A.C.; Pereira, L.J. Influence of ejaculation time on sperm quality parameters in high performance boars. J. Anim. Sci. Adv. 2012, 2, 499–509. [Google Scholar]
- Zapryanova, I.; Malinova, R. Age dynamics of some parameters of semen production of Landrace boars with Danish and English origin. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 25 Suppl. 1, 54–57. [Google Scholar]
- Jaishankar, S.; Tensingh Gnanaraj, P.; Sivakumar, T.; Ronald, B.S.M.; Subramanian, A. Influence of age on semen quality of large white yorkshire boars. Pharma Innov. 2021, 10, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
- Banaszewska, D.; Kondracki, S. An assessment of the breeding maturity of insemination boars based on ejaculate quality changes. Folia Biol. 2012, 60, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kawęcka, M.; Pietruszka, A.; Jacyno, E.; Czarnecki, R.; Kamyczek, M. Quality of semen of young boars of the breeds Pietrain and Duroc and their reciprocal crosses. Arch. Tierz. 2008, 51, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Clark, S.G.; Schaeffer, D.J.; Althouse, G.C. B-Mode ultrasonographic evaluation of paired testicular diameter of mature boars in relation to average total sperm numbers. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 1011–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomiyama, M.; Oikawa, T.; Arakane, T.; Kanetani, T.; Mori, H. Analysis of environmental effects in production and reproduction traits on purebred Berkshire in Japan. Res. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 2, 157–163. [Google Scholar]
- Knecht, D.; Środoń, S.; Szulc, K.; Duziński, K. The effect of photoperiod on selected parameters of boar semen. Liv. Sci. 2013, 157, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharpe, R.M.; McKinnell, C.; Kivlin, C.; Fisher, J.S. Proliferation and functional maturation of Sertoli cells, and their relevance to disorders of testis function in adulthood. Reproduction 2003, 125, 769–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berndtson, W.E.; Igboeli, G.; Parker, W.G. The numbers of Sertoli cells in mature Holstein bulls and their relationship to quantitative aspects of spermatogenesis. Biol. Reprod. 1987, 37, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Leal, M.C.; França, L.R. Slow increase of Sertoli cell efficiency and daily sperm production causes delayed establishment of full sexual maturity in the rodent Chinchilla lanigera. Theriogenology 2009, 71, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Louis, G.F.; Lewis, A.J.; Weldon, W.C.; Miller, P.S.; Kittok, R.J.; Stroup, W.W. The effect of protein intake on boar libido, semen characteristics, and plasma hormone concentrations. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 72, 2038–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Masoumi, R.; Towhidi, A.; Javaremi, A.N.; Nabizadeh, H.; Zhandi, M. Influence of PGF2α on semen quality and libido in Holstein bulls. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2011, 35, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, Y.; Ren, J.; Ren, D.; Guo, Y.; Wu, Y.; Yang, G.; Mao, H.; Brenig, B.; Huang, L. A whole genome scanning for quantitative trait loci on traits related to sperm quality and ejaculation in pigs. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 114, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, D.; Xing, Y.; Lin, M.; Wu, Y.; Li, W.; Yang, S.; Guo, T.; Ren, J.; Ma, J.; Lan, L.; et al. Evaluations of boar gonad development, spermatogenesis with regard to semen characteristics, libido and serum testosterone levels based on Large White Duroc × Chinese Erhualian crossbred boars. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2009, 44, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | Period of Service | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Start of Service (at the Age of 7–8 Months) | After 3 Months of Service (at the Age of 10–11 Months) | After 6 Months of Service (at the Age of 13–14 Months) | After 9 Months of Service (at the Age of 16–17 Months) | |
Number of boars | 49 | 49 | 49 | 49 |
Time from entering the arena until mounting the phantom (s) | 166.66 ± 161.27 | 146.55 ± 135.27 | 154.75 ± 149.76 | 177.98 ± 163.17 |
Time from mounting the phantom until achieving erection (s) | 43.77 ± 34.97 | 40.31 ± 25.11 | 57.47 ± 46.28 | 61.12 ± 58.60 |
Time from entering the arena until achieving erection (s) | 210.43 ± 166.47 | 186.86 ± 142.78 | 212.22 ± 185.54 | 239.10 ± 182.65 |
Time from achieving erection until beginning ejaculation (s) | 48.04 ± 46.42 | 58.04 ± 57.46 | 58.90 ± 46.68 | 50.06 ± 30.35 |
Time from entering the arena until beginning ejaculation (s) | 258.47 ± 180.85 | 244.90 ± 171.12 | 271.12 ± 187.89 | 289.16 ± 185.99 |
Duration of ejaculation (s) | 397.30 ± 151.72 | 399.71 ± 199.62 | 440.24 ± 173.90 | 430.24 ± 201.00 |
Total duration of copulation (s) | 489.11 ± 194.26 | 498.06 ± 224.16 | 556.61 ± 193.17 | 541.42 ± 205.27 |
Number of times mounting the phantom | 2.20 ± 1.65 | 1.63 ± 0.92 | 1.81 ± 1.43 | 1.55 ± 1.41 |
Parameter | Period of Service | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Start of Service (at the Age of 7–8 Months) | After 3 Months of Service (at the Age of 10–11 Months) | After 6 Months of Service (at the Age of 13–14 Months) | After 9 Months of Service (at the Age of 16–17 Months) | |
Number of boars | 49 | 49 | 49 | 49 |
Ejaculate volume (mL) | 212.98 ± 91.49 a | 245.92 ± 97.02 | 255.22 ± 87.98 b | 235.88 ± 75.80 |
Sperm concentration (×103/mm3) | 399.35 ± 134.35 | 394.92 ± 166.99 | 389.10 ± 144.71 | 384.45 ± 142.95 |
Percentage of motile sperm (%) | 73.77 ± 4.84 | 73.06 ± 5.08 | 72.65 ± 4.46 | 72.45 ± 4.34 |
Sperm count (×109) | 58.18 ± 21.59 | 62.35 ± 20.55 | 64.42 ± 19.84 | 58.43 ± 22.56 |
Number of insemination doses | 19.10 ± 7.05 A | 21.92 ± 7.12 | 23.04 ± 7.21 B | 21.73 ± 6.24 |
Period of Semen Collection | Group I ≤140 s | Group II 141–290 s | Group III ≥291 s |
---|---|---|---|
Number of Boars | 16 | 16 | 17 |
Time from entering the arena until beginning ejaculation (s) | |||
Start of service | 96.19 ± 30.13 A | 206.25 ± 40.31 B | 460.41 ± 152.79 C |
After 3 months of service | 210.06 ± 199.04 | 219.62 ± 127.57 | 301.47 ± 173.78 |
After 6 months of service | 205.56 ± 166.43 | 300.25 ± 213.38 | 303.59 ± 177.22 |
After 9 months of service | 278.81 ± 215.16 | 241.81 ± 105.92 | 328.70 ± 196.14 |
Duration of ejaculation (s) | |||
Start of service | 365.94 ± 156.39 A | 328.94 ± 131.18 A | 491.18 ± 122.39 B |
After 3 months of service | 420.19 ± 154.79 | 356.50 ± 125.88 | 421.12 ± 281.88 |
After 6 months of service | 463.19 ± 164.39 | 403.44 ± 170.56 | 443.18 ± 185.10 |
After 9 months of service | 462.87 ± 202.24 | 416.69 ± 185.93 | 405.59 ± 222.04 |
Total duration of copulation (s) | |||
Start of service | 424.31 ± 168.80 A | 400.50 ± 126.43 A | 633.53 ± 193.15 C |
After 3 months of service | 497.56 ± 170.03 | 455.81 ± 127.84 | 538.29 ± 323.75 |
After 6 months of service | 558.44 ± 183.00 | 542.37 ± 206.83 | 553.70 ± 193.51 |
After 9 months of service | 563.87 ± 211.19 | 530.25 ± 204.08 | 514.06 ± 206.18 |
Number of times mounting the phantom | |||
Start of service | 1.37 ± 0.62 A | 2.00 ± 0.97 a | 3.18 ± 2.29 Bb |
After 3 months of service | 1.50 ± 0.89 | 1.62 ± 0.88 | 1.76 ± 1.03 |
After 6 months of service | 1.50 ± 0.81 | 2.12 ± 2.10 | 1.82 ± 0.88 |
After 9 months of service | 1.75 ± 1.23 | 1.31 ± 0.79 | 1.47 ± 0.71 |
Period of Semen Collection | Group 1 ≤140 s | Group 2 141–290 s | Group 3 ≥291 s |
---|---|---|---|
Number of Boars | 16 | 16 | 17 |
Ejaculate volume (mL) | |||
Start of service | 199.25 ± 83.17 | 199.56 ± 60.08 | 238.53 ± 119.08 |
After 3 months of service | 248.62 ± 82.42 | 261.25 ± 102.70 | 227.76 ± 106.56 |
After 6 months of service | 254.81 ± 76.51 | 261.37 ± 83.56 | 249.82 ± 105.45 |
After 9 months of service | 237.06 ± 65.45 | 241.69 ± 79.54 | 243.41 ± 106.28 |
Sperm concentration (×103/mm3) | |||
Start of service | 390.93 ± 162.62 | 406.69 ± 88.74 | 400.35 ± 147.84 |
After 3 months of service | 397.81 ± 171.87 | 364.50 ± 135.41 | 420.82 ± 192.69 |
After 6 months of service | 397.44 ± 146.89 | 316.56± 110.81 A | 449.53± 147.90 B |
After 9 months of service | 367.69 ± 126.11 | 366.56 ± 123.99 | 407.65 ± 173.50 |
Sperm count (×109) | |||
Start of service | 53.38 ± 24.32 | 58.24 ± 18.53 | 62.65 ± 21.88 |
After 3 months of service | 58.21 ± 18.31 | 64.36 ± 21.19 | 64.36 ± 22.52 |
After 6 months of service | 60.87± 17.63 a | 55.82± 9.16 A | 75.86± 24.20 Bb |
After 9 months of service | 47.92± 11.66 A | 55.74 ± 16.08 | 70.11± 29.78 B |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kondracki, S.; Iwanina, M.; Wysokińska, A.; Banaszewska, D.; Kordan, W.; Fraser, L.; Rymuza, K.; Górski, K. The Usefulness of Sexual Behaviour Assessment at the Beginning of Service to Predict the Suitability of Boars for Artificial Insemination. Animals 2021, 11, 3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123341
Kondracki S, Iwanina M, Wysokińska A, Banaszewska D, Kordan W, Fraser L, Rymuza K, Górski K. The Usefulness of Sexual Behaviour Assessment at the Beginning of Service to Predict the Suitability of Boars for Artificial Insemination. Animals. 2021; 11(12):3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123341
Chicago/Turabian StyleKondracki, Stanisław, Maria Iwanina, Anna Wysokińska, Dorota Banaszewska, Władysław Kordan, Leyland Fraser, Katarzyna Rymuza, and Krzysztof Górski. 2021. "The Usefulness of Sexual Behaviour Assessment at the Beginning of Service to Predict the Suitability of Boars for Artificial Insemination" Animals 11, no. 12: 3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123341
APA StyleKondracki, S., Iwanina, M., Wysokińska, A., Banaszewska, D., Kordan, W., Fraser, L., Rymuza, K., & Górski, K. (2021). The Usefulness of Sexual Behaviour Assessment at the Beginning of Service to Predict the Suitability of Boars for Artificial Insemination. Animals, 11(12), 3341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123341