Next Article in Journal
Effect of Inulin Source and a Probiotic Supplement in Pig Diets on Carcass Traits, Meat Quality and Fatty Acid Composition in Finishing Pigs
Next Article in Special Issue
Stage 1-Biomarkers of Kidney Injury in Dogs Undergoing Constant Rate Infusion of Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4
Previous Article in Journal
Exploratory Analysis of Color Forms’ Variability in the Invasive Asian Lady Beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pallas 1773)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical and Histopathological Features of Renal Maldevelopment in Boxer Dogs: A Retrospective Case Series (1999–2018)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cystinuria in Dogs and Cats: What Do We Know after Almost 200 Years?

by
Simona Kovaříková
1,*,
Petr Maršálek
1 and
Kateřina Vrbová
2
1
Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(8), 2437; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082437
Submission received: 8 July 2021 / Revised: 8 August 2021 / Accepted: 13 August 2021 / Published: 19 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Canine and Feline Nephropathies)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cystinuria, as an inborn error of metabolism, is a problem with worldwide distribution and has been reported in various canine and feline breeds. Transepithelial transport of cystine is mediated by COLA transporter and the mutation in genes coding this transporter may cause cystinuria. Urolithiasis associated with typical clinical signs may be the clinical consequence of cystinuria. The mutation causing cystinuria and the mode of inheritance have been determined only in several canine breeds. This makes cystinuria difficult to control and gradually decreases its prevalence. In cats, cystinuria occurs only rarely.

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge on canine and feline cystinuria from available scientific reports. Cystinuria is an inherited metabolic defect characterized by abnormal intestinal and renal amino acid transport in which cystine and the dibasic amino acids ornithine, lysine, and arginine are involved (COLA). At a normal urine pH, ornithine, lysine, and arginine are soluble, but cysteine forms a dimer, cystine, which is relatively insoluble, resulting in crystal precipitation. Mutations in genes coding COLA transporter and the mode of inheritance were identified only in some canine breeds. Cystinuric dogs may form uroliths (mostly in lower urinary tract) which are associated with typical clinical symptoms. The prevalence of cystine urolithiasis is much higher in European countries (up to 14% according to the recent reports) when compared to North America (United States and Canada) where it is approximately 1–3%. Cystinuria may be diagnosed by the detection of cystine urolithiasis, cystine crystalluria, assessment of amino aciduria, or using genetic tests. The management of cystinuria is aimed at urolith removal or dissolution which may be reached by dietary changes or medical treatment. In dogs with androgen-dependent cystinuria, castration will help. In cats, cystinuria occurs less frequently in comparison with dogs.

1. Introduction

Cystinuria is an inherited disorder characterized by the impaired reabsorption of cystine in the proximal tubule of the nephron and the gastrointestinal epithelium. The defective transport also involves the other dibasic amino acids ornithine, lysine, and arginine. The term COLA (cystine, ornithine, lysine, arginine) is used for all these amino acids. Nevertheless, only cystinuria results in urolithiasis because these dibasic amino acids are relatively soluble in urine, despite the fact they may reach high concentrations in the urine of affected animals [1].
In human, cystinuria was first described by Wollaston in 1810 when he extracted a large cystolith from one of his patients. He named it cystic oxide, because he believed that it had such chemical properties and that the stone had originated from the bladder wall [2]. Although it was later shown not be an oxide nor secreted from the urinary bladder, when isolated, the amino acid was named cystine in recognition of this historical discovery [1]. In 1908, Sir Archibald Garrod suggested cystinuria as a condition that may be an inborn error of metabolism [3] and Dent and Rose hypothesized that cystinuria is an inborn error of cystine transport [4].
In dogs, the presence of cystine uroliths was reported in 1823 and thus cystinuria was the first reported canine inborn error of metabolism [5]. Now, cystinuria is a disease with worldwide distribution and it is known to affect more than 170 canine breeds according to the reports of veterinary urolith analysis laboratories [6]. Cystinuria is not a problem of dogs and cats only. Indeed, it has also been reported in other canids and felids or ferrets [7,8,9,10,11,12]. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on cystinuria in dogs and cats.

2. Etiopathogenesis of Cystinuria

Cystine is a non-essential sulfur-containing amino acid composed of two molecules of the amino acid cysteine. Cystine is absorbed through the wall of the small intestine and is normally present in low concentrations in plasma. Plasma amino acids are freely filtered at the glomerulus. Under normal conditions, more than 99% of these amino acids are reabsorbed in the proximal renal tubules. The reabsorption of cystine, ornithine, lysine, and arginine is mediated by COLA transporter [13].

2.1. COLA Transporter

The COLA transporter (b0,+) was originally thought to be a heterodimer, but is likely a heterotetramer formed from two heterodimers consisting of the rBAT (extracellular heavy chain, encoded by SLC3A1, solute carrier family 3 member 1) and b0,+AT (the light chain, encoded by SLC7A9, solute carrier family 7 member 9) subunits joined by a disulfide bridge [14,15,16]. This system is the main effector of cystine reabsorption in the kidney. The apical transport system b0,+ mediates influx dibasic amino acids and cystine in exchange for neutral amino acids. The subunit b0,+AT has 12 transmembrane domains typical cell membrane transporters and heterodimers with rBAT exclusively to form the COLA amino acid transporter [17]. Mutations in either rBAT or b0,+AT can cause cystinuria. In people, 133 mutations in SLC3A1 and 95 mutations in SLC7A9 have been identified. Reported mutations include nonsense, missense, splicing, frameshifts, and large sequence rearrangements [13].
The same defect is present in the epithelial cells of the small intestine and altered transport of COLA amino acids from gastrointestinal tract occurs [18,19,20], but this is of little consequence as amino acids are primarily absorbed as small peptides. With the exception of lysine, these amino acids are classified as non-essential, and all four of these dibasic amino acids may be absorbed in their dipeptide forms from the gastrointestinal tract [16]. Thus, cystinuria is not associated with protein malnutrition or COLA amino acid deficiency [21]. Nevertheless, it can be associated with disorders of other amino acids. Four English Bulldogs and one Miniature Dachshund with cystinuria were diagnosed with carnitine and taurine deficiency while participating in a clinical trial evaluating dietary management of cystine urolithiasis [22]. In three of these dogs, excessive quantities of carnitine were lost in their urine, but urine excretion of taurine was within the reference range in spite of plasma taurine deficiency. It can be explained by the fact, that cystine is a precursor amino acid and increased renal excretion of cystine may adversely affect taurine synthesis.

2.2. Genetic Aspects

In humans, cystinuria has been classified phenotypically into two types: Type A is caused by defects in SLC3A1 and is inherited in a true autosomal recessive manner, with heterozygotes having a normal urinary excretion of cystine. Type B is caused by SLC7A9 variants and is autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance, with heterozygotes having a variable degree of cystine hyperexcretion, some within the physiologic range [23].
In dogs, the first genetic description of cystinuria was conducted with Newfoundlands and autosomal recessive inheritance was suggested [24]. Later, the C-to-T nonsense mutation in exon 2 of the SLC3A1 gene was described. This mutation acts as an early stop codon, precluding the production of rBAT protein and leading to the loss of b0,+. In that report, cystinuric dogs of other breeds were examined (Swedish Lapphund, Dachshund, German short-haired pointer, Irish Setter, Jack Russel Terrier, Corgi) and either heterozygosity at the SLC3A1 locus or a lack of mutations coding region of the SLC3A1 gene were observed. This finding indicates that cystinuria is genetically heterogenous in dogs [25].
Brons et al. (2013) performed a study of mutations associated with cystinuria in various breeds of dogs and a new classification system for canine cystinuria was established according to their results [26]. In cystinuric Labrador Retriever and Labrador mix-breed dogs, the deleted guanine in codon GGC causes a shift of the open reading frame, leading to premature stop codon 41 codons later. This leads to truncation of the rBAT protein to 157 amino acids instead of 784. The early termination probably causes accelerated RNA decay and decreased or no protein synthesis. The mutation was identified in an autosomal recessive form of the disease which is phenotypically and genetically similar to that previously described in Newfoundlands [24,25]. Only homozygous Labrador Retrievers were cystinuric (both males and females, regardless of neuter status) and developed cystine calculi early in life, albeit more frequently and earlier in males. Labrador Retrievers that were heterozygous for this nonsense mutation showed neither signs of the urinary tract disease nor positive nitroprusside test [26].
In Australian Cattle dogs with cystinuria, a heterozygous deletion of six bases was found in exon 6 of the SLC3A1 gene. The same homozygous 6 bp deletion was found in one cystinuric mixed breed dog. According to the genetic breed determination, this dog consisted of 1/4 each from Miniature Poodle, Chihuahua, and Shih-tzu with several other breeds consisting of the last quarter, but with no evidence of Australian Cattle dog. All Australian Cattle dogs, males and females, homozygous or heterozygous for this mutation were cystinuric. Homozygous males showed clinical signs (urethral obstruction) earlier in life than heterozygous males. Thus, cystinuria in Australian Cattle dogs is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait [26].
In Miniature Pinschers, a single base change (missense mutation) in exon 9 of the SLC7A9 gene was detected. It caused the substitution of a large positively charged, hydrophilic arginine for the very small, hydrophobic glycine residue. All cystinuric Miniature Pinschers assessed in this study were found to be heterozygous for this mutation. The exonic sequence of the SLC3A1 gene did not indicate any mutation. These results document the heterogeneity in canine cystinuria.
In dogs, cystinuria had been historically divided into two types: type I referring to a mutation in a SLC3A1 gene with autosomal recessive inheritance and non-type I cystinuria which is associated with milder degree of cystinuria and which is observed in mature intact males of various breeds [27]. The new classification system describes type I cystinuria with autosomal recessive inheritance, type II with autosomal dominant inheritance, and type III for sex-limited inheritance. Involvement of the SLC3A1 gene is indicated by adding A, and similarly B indicates mutations in SLC7A9 [26] (Table 1).
Type III cystinuria (androgen-dependent) occurs in intact males only, occurs later in the life when compared to Newfoundlands, is less severe and associated with variable concentrations of cystine in the urine. This type of cystinuria is reported in Mastiffs, French and English Bulldogs, Basset Hounds, and Irish Terriers. An SLC3A1 nonsense mutation appears to be associated with cystinuria in Mastiffs and related breeds, but not in Irish Terriers or Scottish Deerhounds [27]. The underlying cause of this proposed androgen dependency is currently unknown.
Nevertheless, in most affected breeds, the mutation causing cystinuria is not determined. In several breeds, sequencing of the exons of both SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 did not identify any putative underlying mutation [28]. Thus, further studies of various affected breeds are needed to detect the mutation and to determine the mode of inheritance.

3. Cystine Urolithiasis

3.1. Solubility of Cystine in Urine

Cystinuria by itself does not result in urolithiasis and many cystinuric dogs do not form uroliths [29]. Major factors involved in urolith formation include supersaturation of urine with calculogenic minerals resulting in crystal formation, effects of urinary inhibitors and promoters of crystallization, crystal aggregation, and growth [30,31]. Cystine uroliths formation is affected mainly by urine pH. Cystine is relatively insoluble at physiological pH levels of 5–7, with a pKa level of 8.3 [32]. Up to pH 7, the solubility of cystine is approximately 250 mg/L, whereas at a urine pH level of 7.5, this will double to 500 mg/L urine and triple at pH 8 or higher [33] (Figure 1).

3.2. Prevalence of Cystine Urolithiasis

The prevalence of cystine urolithiasis in dogs varies with geographic location and time (details are specified in Table 2).
According to the most available reports, the prevalence in North America (United States and Canada) is approximately 1–3% [39,41,44]. The prevalence in European countries is much higher, ranging from 3% up to 26% in older reports or up to 14% in the most recent studies [57,68,69]. Considering the results of recent studies from North America and Europe, the calculated prevalence of cystine urolithiasis is 0.8% in North America and 8.5% in European countries [41,44,51,56,58,60,62,63,65,66,67,68,69]. When evaluating the trends in prevalence of cystine urolithiasis, a gradual increase can be observed in the last decade, both in North America and Europe [41,44,56,68,69]. The latest published report from Minnesota Urolith Center mentioned the cystine urolith prevalence of 7% (from total 61,160 submissions) [72]. Nevertheless, this high number is at least partly affected by submissions from Europe, where the highest portion of cystine uroliths can be seen when compared to other areas.
In all reports on canine cystinuria, males are affected significantly more often than females (98.8% and 1.2%, respectively; these numbers were calculated by taking together available data from scientific reports) [36,37,40,45,47,48,49,50,51,55,56,57,58,59,61,63,65,66,67,68,69,71]. Androgen dependency in type III cystinuria may explain the epidemiological observation that cystine urolithiasis has historically been more common in dogs from European countries than from the USA, where neutering of dogs is more common. In the United States, most (68%) young adult dogs (1–4 years) is castrated and the percentage of castrated dogs gradually increases with age to 81% in adult dogs (4–10 years) and 86% in dogs older than 10 years [73]. In Germany, 43.1% of canine population older than one year is neutered (39% of males and 48% of females) [74]. Similar numbers are reported from England, where 44.73% of male dogs are neutered [75]. Cystine urolithiasis typically occurs in young adult and middle-aged dogs, with reported means from 4 to 6 years [24,37,48,49,52,54,55,66,71].
Various breeds are associated with cystinuria. The most mentioned are English Bulldog, Newfoundland, Dachshund, Chihuahua, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, Rottweiler, French Bulldog, and Miniature Pinscher. Nevertheless, reported breeds vary with the geographical location and time of the study and these results may be affected by the breed popularity. Lulich and Ulrich report more than 170 canine breeds where cystine urolithiasis was diagnosed (without specification) [6]. The list of breeds particularly mentioned in scientific reports is in Table 3.
Cystine uroliths are rarely (3%) reported from the upper urinary tract. The most common localization of cystine uroliths are urinary bladder and urethra. They may cause urethral obstruction with typical clinical manifestation [37,38,55]. This is consistent with the findings in mice or ferrets [12,79] but in contrast with human medicine, where cystine nephroliths are more common [1]. Occasionally, cystine uroliths may be associated with urinary tract infection. Ling et al. (1986) reported the presence of UTI in almost one third of cases [80].

4. Diagnosis

4.1. Diagnosis of Cystine Urolithiasis

Imaging methods are the most definitive diagnostic tool for detection of urolithiasis in general. They are used to verify the presence of uroliths and their location, number, size, shape, and density [21]. The radiodensity of cystine stones compared to soft tissue is similar to struvite, less than calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate, and greater than urate. Survey radiographs may be insensitive for detection of small cystine uroliths (less than 1 to 3 mm). Double contrast cystography and/or ultrasonography may be needed. However, ultrasonography involves difficulty in detecting uroliths in the ureters and urethra. Thus, the combination of various methods may be necessary [81].
Canine cystine uroliths are usually round or ovoid shape with smooth surface. The color may vary, e.g., yellowish brown, medium-light tan, and a range from light yellow to reddish brown are reported [76,82,83] (Figure 2). They are commonly multiple [82], e.g., Méric et al. reported seven as a median number of stones [65]. Their size varies from less than a millimeter to several centimeters in diameter [76]. Most canine cystine uroliths are pure and few contain other minerals, especially ammonium urate and calcium oxalate or struvite [76,77,78]. In contrast, Escolar et al. reported the presence of small amounts of calcium apatite in at least 55% of canine cystine uroliths [57].
An estimation of the urolith composition may be done on the basis of their macroscopic appearance, but this may be associated with considerable errors. Quantitative methods (optical crystallography and infrared spectroscopy) are currently methods of choice [81]. Qualitative analysis showed less than 50% agreement in the case of cystine calculi [84].

4.2. Diagnosis of Cystinuria

4.2.1. Urinalysis

Cystine crystals are colorless hexagonal plates. Their six sides may or may not be equal and the crystals tend to aggregate and appear layered (Figure 3). Their detection in urine provides strong support for cystinuria because these crystals do not occur in healthy animals. It is noteworthy that cystine crystals are not constantly present in cystinuric dogs [76].

4.2.2. Assessment of Aminoaciduria

A coloric cyanide-nitroprusside test may be performed. Sodium cyanide reduces cystine to cysteine and the free sulfhydryl groups subsequently react with nitroprusside to form a characteristic purple color [85]. Nevertheless, the test requires dangerous substances. Thus, it is not suitable as an in-house test despite being easy to perform and only selected laboratories offer this test [86].
Direct measurement of urine cystine concentration is the most precise method allowing quantification. The most used techniques are high-pressure liquid chromatography and automated amino acid analyzers. Not all cystinuric dogs show the same pattern of urinary amino acid loss. Some dogs only lose cystine, whereas others demonstraate increased excretion of cystine, as well as ornithine, lysine, and arginine [87]. The difference (isolated cystinuria vs. urinary excretion of other amino acids) may be caused by the genetic background of the disease, i.e., the specific mutation in particular gene and homozygosity or heterozygosity. Genetic variants may affect the impairment of the transmembrane carrier and thus the extent of aminoaciduria. Because of altered tubular reabsorption of the dibasic amino acids associated with cystinuria, the concentration of ornithine, lysine, and arginine should be evaluated together with cystine. The results of COLA amino acids may also support diagnosis in the case cystinuria, because cystine may precipitate and thus cause lower concentrations than were originally present in the urine. The urine concentration of amino acids is expressed as micromoles per gram of creatinine. Dogs with either cystine levels of >200 μmol/g creatinine or COLA values of >700 μmol/g creatinine are considered cystinuric [27]. In cystinuric dogs, the urinary cystine excretion seems to be affected by age. Older dogs over five years were found to have significantly lower cystine levels than younger dogs (five years or younger) [88].

4.2.3. Genetic Tests

In some breeds, genetic tests for cystinuria are available (http://research.vet.upenn.edu/WSAVA-LabSearch, accessed on 1 May 2021). Such tests offer a method of diagnosing cystinuric animals before they present with clinical signs of cystine urolithiasis and may identify not only clinically affected patients, but also asymptomatic carriers. The results may have an impact on breeding programs.

5. Treatment and Prevention

Cystinuria per se, as an inborn error of metabolism, cannot be successfully treated. The management of cystinuria is aimed at urolith removal or dissolution in case of urolithiasis and/or prevention of urolith formation. After surgical removal, cystine uroliths commonly recur within 6–12 months [78,89]. Because of the high recurrence rate, prevention is necessary. Without such a strategy, many owners may resort to euthanasia instead of further surgical interventions.
Different therapeutic approaches have been described over the years, such as dietary modification, reduction of urine cystine concentration by induced diuresis, increase of cystine solubility by urine alkalinization and conversion of cystine to a more soluble compound with D-penicillamine or tiopronine [88]. According to the current recommendations on the treatment and prevention of uroliths, medical dissolution should be considered before removal [90]. In cases when dissolution cannot be achieved (medications or dissolution foods cannot be administered or tolerated or the urolith cannot be adequately bathed in modified urine), minimally invasive techniques for urolith removal should be preferred (reviewed in [91]).

5.1. Dietary Treatment

Dietary treatment plays a crucial role in the management of cystine stone formation. The dissolution can be achieved by decreasing the concentration of crystallogenic compounds and by increasing cystine solubility.
Urine dilution is an essential step for the prevention and/or dissolution of uroliths regardless of their mineral type. Increased diuresis decreases the concentration of crystal precursors and stimulates more frequent urination, decreasing the time for crystal aggregation [92]. Increasing dietary moisture significantly reduces urinary specific gravity and it is an effective way to enhance diuresis [93].

5.1.1. Protein

High-protein foods should be avoided in dogs at risk of cystine urolithiasis. Consumption of low protein, moist veterinary food led to a 20–25% reduction in 24-h urine cystine excretion in cystinuric dogs when compared to moist, canine adult maintenance food [76]. Urine cystine excretion can be modulated by dietary protein intake, and more specifically methionine (precursor of cysteine) and cysteine. Feeding a diet containing amounts of these essential amino acids close to their minimum is therefore recommended. Most plant protein sources have smaller amounts of sulfur amino acids than animal proteins [21,76]. Protein levels in foods for cystinuric dogs should be between 10% and 18% dry matter [6]. Because of possible taurine and carnitine deficiency, cystinuric dogs should be monitored or their diets should be supplemented with carnitine and taurine [22].

5.1.2. Sodium

Dietary sodium restriction seems to be an important component of the therapeutic strategy in cystinuric people because dietary sodium may enhance cystinuria [94,95]. Dietary sodium in canine therapeutic diets should be limited to less than 0.3% dry matter [6].

5.1.3. Urinary pH

As mentioned above, the solubility of cystine in urine is pH dependent. Beneficial effect has been reported in feeding alkalinizing food. Thus, the food that produces a urinary pH range of 7.1–7.7 is recommended for dogs with cystine urolithiasis. Urinary pH values higher than 7.7 should be avoided until it is determined whether they provide a significant risk factor for formation of calcium phosphate uroliths [6]. When a therapeutic diet alone is not able to provide alkaline urine, the administration of alkalinizing agents is recommended. Because of the reports that dietary sodium may enhance cystinuria, potassium citrate should be preferred to sodium bicarbonate [6]. Desired goals of dietary management are urine pH values above 7.5 and urine specific gravity below 1.020 [86].

5.2. Medical Treatment

5.2.1. D-Penicillamine

D-penicillamine (dimethylcysteine) is a first-generation cysteine chelating drug. It interacts with cystine to form a penicillamine-cysteine mixed disulfide in the urine which is 50 times more soluble than free cystine. Consequent decreased free cystine excretion into urine diminishes the likelihood of urolith formation [78,96]. The recommended dose for the treatment of canine cystinuria is 30 mg/kg/day, divided into two subdoses. After oral administration, this drug is rapidly absorbed from the intestine and excreted via kidneys. According to Bovée 1986 [78], the therapy with D-penicillamine is associated with nausea and vomiting in approximately half of treated dogs. Thus, the effectiveness of the medication is limited. The extent of adverse effects is dose dependent. The drug may be mixed with food to prevent vomiting, however this reduces its absorption in gastrointestinal tract [97]. In people, the administration of D-penicillamine is associated with a variety of adverse effects, including glomerulonephropathy with proteinuria, gastrointestinal signs (abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting, oral ulcers), hematological abnormalities (thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, aplastic anemia), cutaneous changes (urticaria, pruritus, erythema, alopecia), and dyspnea [98].
Osborne et al. [99] reported fever and lymphadenopathy in a Dachshund given D-penicillamine at a recommended dose. The signs subsided following withdrawal of the drug. Because of a high risk of adverse effects accompanying the treatment and current availability of safer options, D-penicillamine is now not recommended for the management of canine cystinuria [86].

5.2.2. 2-Merkaptopropionyl-glycine (Tiopronin)

Chemically related to D-penicillamine, 2-merkaptopropionyl-glycine (2-MPG, commonly called tiopronin) is a second-generation cysteine chelating agent that decreases the concentration of cystine by a thiol-disulfide exchange reaction. Tiopronin has higher oxidation-reduction potential than penicillamine and may be even more effective [100]. The drug is eliminated almost exclusively by the kidneys with rapid urinary excretion [101].
Tiopronin have been used in the treatment of canine cystinuria since the 1980s and successful dissolution of urolith have been reported [102]. Oral administration of 2-MPG at a daily dose of approximately 40 mg/kg/day divided in two equal doses was effective in complete urolith dissolution in nine of 17 dogs. The daily dose of 30 mg/kg was used as prophylactic and during this course, urolith did not reform in 14 dogs. In four dogs with urolith reformation during the treatment, the uroliths dissolved when the 2-MPG dose was raised back to 40 mg/kg [89]. According to the results of a study evaluating 14 years of clinical experience with the medical treatment of 88 cystinuric dogs, adverse effects were found in 11 dogs. The most severe were aggressiveness towards members of the families and myopathy (bilateral masseter and quadriceps pain, weakness, difficulty chewing and swallowing). The other adverse effects were proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, anemia, high liver enzymes activities and bile acids, tiredness, small pustules of the skin, dry and crusty nose, and sulfur odor of the urine. These signs were noted between one and 36 months (mean 7.6 months) after the start of treatment. All signs gradually disappeared when tiopronin treatment was stopped [88]. Dissolution required 2–4 months of therapy. The combination of litholytic food and 2-MPG therapy is more effective in promoting dissolution of uroliths than either alone. The mean time required to dissolve the cystine uroliths was 78 days (range 11 to 211 days) [103]. Disadvantage of the tiopronin treatment is its high price, which can be deterrent for many owners and inadequate availability because in many countries, tiopronin is not distributed. Current treatment recommendations discourage the use of D-penicillamine and encourage the use of the less toxic 2-MPG [86].
D-penicillamine is well known for its metal-binding properties. The short-term treatment with D-penicillamine conspicuously increased the renal excretion of calcium, copper, and zinc. In contrast, 2-MPG does not to any appreciable extent increase the urinary excretion of metals. Thus, there is no risk for renal losses of biologically important metals [104].

5.2.3. Captopril

Captopril is a thiol-containing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor that is primarily used as an antihypertensive agent. Captopril-cysteine disulfide is 200 times more soluble than cystine. Results of clinical trials suggest that captopril may be clinically efficacious in at least some people with difficulty controlling cystinuria [95]. Currently, there is no report on the use of captopril in canine cystinuria.

5.2.4. Bucillamine

Bucillamine is a drug developed from tiopronin that may have greater affinity for cysteine. It is used as an antirheumatic agent. The efficacy of bucillamine in human cystinuria is currently investigated [95]. Similar to captopril, there are no reports on use of bucillamine in cystinuric dogs.

5.3. Castration

Surgical or medical castration can resolve cystinuria in the subset of male dogs with androgen-dependent cystinuria. Castration appears to lower the urinary cystine and COLA concentrations and to prevent cystine calculi formation. The effect of castration in breeds with type of cystinuria seems to have greater effect in comparison with dietary changes [105]. To determine whether neutering reduces cystinuria, measurement of urine cystine concentration before and three months after castration is recommended. If the urine cystine remains elevated at three months, another evaluation should be performed again at six months. Persistently positive results indicate that the dog has a non-androgen-dependent form of the disease [86]. In dogs with androgen-dependent cystinuria, the question may be raised as to whether neutering alone will result in urolith dissolution [90]. In dogs with other types of cystinuria, castration should be recommended as well to prevent further breeding (wanted or accidental) and thus the passing of this condition on to the future generations.

5.4. Future Therapies

5.4.1. L-Cystine Dimethyl Ester and L-Cystine Methyl Ester (L-CDME and L-CME)

A new alternative approach for the prevention of recurrent urolithiasis is based on crystal growth inhibition. It has been shown that L-CDME and L-CME dramatically reduce the growth velocity of cystine molecules [106]. The efficacy of these molecules was demonstrated in vivo using murine models [107]. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to evaluate the effect and safety of this therapy in people or dogs.

5.4.2. Alpha-Lipoic Acid

In a mouse model of cystinuria, it was reported that the nutritional supplement of alpha-lipoic acid inhibits stone formation by increasing the solubility of urinary cystine [108]. Moreover, in this case, clinical trials must be performed.

5.4.3. Selenium

In a double-blinded clinical trial study conducted on 48 humans with cystinuria, selenium supplementation (200 mg/daily for six weeks) led to a significant reduction in the volume of cystine crystals in urine. Therefore, since reducing cystine crystal volume decreases crystal formation, selenium may be effective to cure patients with cystinuria [109]. No similar study has been performed in dogs.

5.4.4. Tolvaptan

Tolvaptan (vasopressin receptor antagonist) showed efficacy in preventing cystine stone growth in cystinuric mice through increased liquid intake and urine volume [110]. The efficacy, short-term safety, and tolerability of tolvaptan was evaluated in a very recent study. Four young patients were enrolled and increased urinary volumes were observed. No abnormalities in serum electrolytes or liver enzymes were found, and only extreme thirst was reported [111]. It is questionable if this type of therapy is suitable for dogs, for whom the opportunity to urinate depends mainly on the owners and their schedule.

6. Cystinuria in Cats

In cats, cystinuria occurs less commonly than in dogs according to the reports of urolith centers. In the United States, feline cystine calculi represents only 0.1% of all feline uroliths (92 in 94 776) compared with 0.75% of canine uroliths (3402 in 451 891) [39]. Recent European studies where canine and feline uroliths were evaluated showed a similar prevalence of feline cystine urolithiasis (0.11% in cats vs. 13.6% in dogs) [57,58,60,69]. Further details are presented in Table 4.
Feline cystinuria was first documented in 1991 in a single case report. A 10-month-old male Siamese cat was referred for cystine crystalluria. In this cat, the fractional reabsorption of cystine, ornithine, lysine and arginine was markedly lower when compared to clinically normal cat [119]. Subsequently, clinical features in 18 cystinuric non-purebred domestic short-haired and purebred cats were summarized. There were eight males (all castrated) and nine females (seven of them spayed); in one cat, the gender was unknown. The mean age of affected cats was 3.6 years with the range from four months to 12.2 years. The cats were presented for signs of lower urinary tract disease. Cystine crystalluria was a characteristic finding. Urine amino acid profiles of four affected cats also revealed increased levels of ornithine, lysine, and arginine. The mode of inheritance was not determined. All uroliths were obtained from the bladder and urethra and were radiodense [120]. The later studies confirmed, that both males and females are affected almost equally, and this is independent of neuter status and thus androgen-dependent type of cystinuria seems to be unlikely in cats [114,118,121].
The first mutation detected in association with cystinuria in cats was the missense mutation in SLC3A1. The affected cat was intact male and was homozygous for this mutation. The cat was presented for signs of lower urinary tract disease with finding of cystine crystals at the age of two months [122]. In a group of seven cystinuric cats, unique SLC7A9 variants were found. All these cats were juvenile to middle-aged when clinical signs first appeared. All cats were either prepubertal or neutered before cystine crystals occurred [121]. In Germany, the missense mutation in SLC7A9 in Siamese-crossbreed littermates was reported [123]. These results show a heterogeneity in cats as reported in dogs or humans. Further studies are needed in this field to obtain more information on genetic background and mode of inheritance. In cats, cystinuria was reported in Domestic Short-haired cat, Domestic medium-haired cat, Domestic long-haired cat, Maine Coon cat, Sphynx, Siamese cat, and Korat [119,120,121,123].
The treatment of feline cystinuria is based on the same strategies as the treatment of canine cystinuria. Nevertheless, because of infrequency of this condition, clinical trials are missing. To minimize the recurrence of cystinuria, diet lower in protein and sodium content which produces neutral to alkaline urine should be fed. The urine pH should be above 6.5; if not, potassium citrate can be added. The water intake should be increased by feeding of canned therapeutic food or adding water to food to lower urine specific gravity below 1.030. Because of the lack of clinical trials, the medical treatment of feline cystinuria with 2-MPG should by cautiously considered in recurrent cases [124]. According to the available reports, feline cystinuria seems to occur earlier in the life when compared to dogs [120,122]. Thus, affected cats may be diagnosed earlier and excluded from breeding before they have descendants. This can explain the lower and stable prevalence of feline cystinuria.

7. Conclusions

Despite the fact that cystinuria was the first described inborn error of metabolism in dogs, many questions concerning genetic aspects and mode of inheritance remain. The answers to these questions may help to control cystinuria and decrease its prevalence in the canine population.

Author Contributions

S.K. conducted literature search and wrote the paper; P.M. edited the work and assisted with the authorship of the paper; K.V. helped with the literature search and final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the internal grant FVHE/Večerek/ITA2020 of the University of Veterinary Sciences Brno.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable to the present work.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable to the present work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Iveta Kučerová for the English proofreading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mattoo, A.; Goldfarb, D.S. Cystinuria. Semin. Nephrol. 2008, 28, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wollaston, W.H. On cystic oxide, a new species of urinary calculus. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 1810, 100, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Garrod, A.E. The Croonian Lectures on inborn errors of metabolism. Lancet 1908, 172, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Dent, C.E.; Rose, G.A. Aminoacid metabolism in cystinuria. Quart. J. Med. 1951, 20, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Lassaigne, J. Observation sur l’existence de l’oxide cystique dans un calcul vesical du chien, et essai analytique sur la composition élémentaire de cette substance particulière. Ann. Chim. Phys. 1823, 23, 328–334. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lulich, J.P.; Ulrich, L. Canine cystine urolithiasis: Causes, detection, dissolution and prevention. In Small Animal Clinical Nutrition, 5th ed.; Hand, M.S., Thatcher, C.D., Remillard, R.L., Roudebush, P., Novotny, B.J., Eds.; Mark Morris Institute: Topeka, KS, USA, 2010; pp. 881–890. [Google Scholar]
  7. Elliot, J.S.; Ribeiro, M.E.; Eusebio, E. Cystinuria in the blotched genet. Invest. Urol. 1968, 5, 568–571. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Bush, M.; Bovee, K.C. Cystinuria in a maned wolf. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1978, 173, 1159–1162. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bovee, K.C.; Bush, M.; Dietz, J.; Jezyk, P.; Segal, S. Cystinuria in the maned wolf of South America. Science 1981, 212, 919–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mussart, N.B.; Coppo, J.A. Cystine nephrolithiasis in an endangered canid, Chrysocyon brachyurus (Carnivora: Canidae). Rev. Biol. Trop. 1999, 47, 623–625. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cannizzo, S.A.; Stinner, M.; Kennedy-Stoskopf, S. Prevalence of cystinuria in servals (Leptailurus serval) in the United States. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2017, 48, 1102–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pacheco, R.E. Cystine Urolithiasis in Ferrets. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2020, 23, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chillarón, J.; Font-Llitjós, M.; Fort, J.; Zorzano, A.; Goldfarb, D.S.; Nunes, V.; Palacín, M. Pathophysiology and treatment of cystinuria. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2010, 6, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Palacín, M.; Estévez, R.; Bertran, J.; Zorzano, A. Molecular biology of mammalian plasma membrane amino acid transporters. Physiol. Rev. 1998, 78, 969–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Palacín, M.; Nunes, V.; Font-Llitjós, M.; Jiménez-Vidal, M.; Fort, J.; Gasol, E.; Pineda, M.; Feliubadaló, L.; Chillarón, J.; Zorzano, A. The genetics of heteromeric amino acid transporters. Physiology 2005, 20, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sahota, A.; Tischfield, J.A.; Goldfarb, D.S.; Ward, M.D.; Hu, L. Cystinuria: Genetic aspects, mouse models, and a new approach to therapy. Urolithiasis 2019, 47, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fernández, E.; Carrascal, M.; Rousaud, F.; Abián, J.; Zorzano, A.; Palacín, M.; Chillarón, J. rBAT-b(0,+)AT heterodimer is the main apical reabsorption system for cystine in the kidney. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2002, 283, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Treacher, R.J. Intestinal absorption of lysine in cystinuric dogs. J. Comp. Path. 1965, 75, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Holtzapple, P.G.; Rea, C.; Bovee, K.; Segal, S. Characteristics of cystine and lysine transport in renal jejunal tissue from cystinuric dogs. Metab. Clin. Exp. 1971, 20, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tsan, M.F.; Wilson, T.H.; Jones, T.C. Canine cystinuria: Intestinal and renal amino acid transport. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1972, 33, 2463–2468. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bartges, J.W.; Callens, A.J. Urolithiasis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2015, 45, 747–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sanderson, S.L.; Osborne, C.A.; Lulich, J.P.; Bartges, J.W.; Pierdont, M.E.; Ogburn, P.N.; Koehler, L.A.; Swanson, L.L.; Bird, K.A.; Ulrich, L.K. Evaluation of urinary carnitine and taurine excretion in 5 cystinuric dogs with carnitine and taurine deficiency. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2001, 15, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Font-Llitjós, M.; Jiménez-Vidal, M.; Bisceglia, L.; Di Perna, M.; de Sanctis, L.; Rousaud, F.; Zelante, L.; Palacín, M.; Nunes, V. New insights into cystinuria: 40 new mutations, genotype-phenotype correlation, and digenic inheritance causing partial phenotype. J. Med. Genet. 2005, 42, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Casal, M.L.; Giger, U.; Bovee, K.C.; Patterson, D.F. Inheritance of cystinuria and renal defect in Newfoundlands. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1995, 207, 1585–1589. [Google Scholar]
  25. Henthorn, P.S.; Liu, J.L.; Gidalevich, T.; Fang, J.K.; Casal, M.L.; Patterson, D.F.; Giger, U. Canine cystinuria: Polymorphism in the canine SLC3A1 gene and identification of a nonsense mutation in cystinuric Newfoundland dogs. Hum. Genet. 2000, 107, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brons, A.K.; Henthorn, P.S.; Raj, K.; Fitzgerald, C.A.; Liu, J.; Sewell, A.C.; Giger, U. SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 Mutations in Autosomal Recessive or Dominant Canine Cystinuria: A New Classification System. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2013, 27, 1400–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Giger, U.; Brons, A.; Mizukami, K.; Slutsky, J.; Raj, K.; Fitzgerald, C.A.; Strickland, S.; Sewell, A.C.; Henthorn, P.S. Update on Fanconi syndrome and cystinuria. In Proceedings of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, 15–18 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
  28. Harnevik, L.; Hoppe, A.; Soderkvist, P. SLC7A9 cDNA cloning and mutational analysis of SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 in canine cystinuria. Mamm. Genome 2006, 17, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brand, E.; Cahill, G.F.; Kassell, B. Canine cystinuria: V. Family history of two cystinuric Irish terriers and cystine determinations in dog urine. J. Biol. Chem. 1940, 133, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Coe, F.L.; Parks, J.H.; Asplin, J.R. Medical progress—The pathogenesis and treatment of kidney stones. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 327, 1141–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Bartges, J.W.; Kirk, C.; Lane, I.F. Update: Management of calcium oxalate uroliths in dogs and cats. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2004, 34, 969–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Knoll, T.; Zollner, A.; Wendt-Nordahl, G.; Michel, M.; Alken, P. Cystinuria in childhood and adolescence: Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2005, 20, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Claes, D.J.; Jackson, E. Cystinuria: Mechanisms and management. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2012, 27, 2031–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Krombach, P.; Wendt-Nordahl, G.; Knoll, T. Cystinuria and cystine stones. In Urinary Tract Stone Disease; Rao, P.N., Preminger, G.M., Kavanagh, J.P., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2011; pp. 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dent, C.E.; Senior, B. Studies on the treatment of cystinuria. Br. J. Urol. 1955, 27, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ling, G.V.; Ruby, A.L. Canine uroliths. Analysis of data derived from 813 specimens. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 1986, 16, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Case, L.C.; Ling, G.V.; Franti, C.E.; Ruby, A.L.; Stevens, F.; Johnson, D.L. Cystine-containing urinary calculi in dogs: 102 cases (1981–1989). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1992, 201, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Osborne, C.A.; Lulich, J.P.; Polzin, D.J.; Sanderson, S.L.; Koehler, L.A.; Ulrich, L.K.; Bird, K.A.; Swanson, L.L.; Pederson, L.A.; Sudo, S.Z. Analysis of 77,000 canine uroliths. Perspectives from the Minnesota Urolith Center. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 1999, 29, 17–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Osborne, C.A.; Lulich, J.P.; Kruger, J.M.; Ulrich, L.K.; Koehler, L.A. Analysis of 451,891 canine uroliths, feline uroliths, and feline urethral plugs from 1981 to 2007: Perspectives from the Minnesota Urolith Center. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 2009, 39, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Low, W.W.; Uhl, J.M.; Kass, P.H.; Ruby, A.L.; Westropp, J.L. Evaluation of trends in urolith composition and characteristics of dogs with urolithiasis: 25,499 cases (1985–2006). JAVMA J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2010, 236, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kopecny, L.; Palm, C.A.; Segev, G.; Westropp, J.L. Urolithiasis in dogs: Evaluation of trends in urolith composition and risk factors (2006–2018). J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2021, 35, 1406–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Houston, D.M.; Moore, A.E.; Favrin, M.G.; Hoff, B. Canine urolithiasis: A look at over 16 000 urolith submissions to the Canadian Veterinary Urolith Centre from February 1998 to April 2003. Can. Vet. J. Rev. Vet. Can. 2004, 45, 225–230. [Google Scholar]
  43. Houston, D.M.; Moore, A.E.P. Canine and feline urolithiasis: Examination of over 50 000 urolith submissions to the Canadian Veterinary Urolith Centre from 1998 to 2008. Can. Vet. J. Rev. Vet. Can. 2009, 50, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar]
  44. Houston, D.M.; Weese, H.E.; Vanstone, N.P.; Moore, A.E.; Weese, J.S. Analysis of canine urolith submissions to the Canadian Veterinary Urolith Centre, 1998–2014. Can. Vet. J. Rev. Vet. Can. 2017, 58, 45–50. [Google Scholar]
  45. Del Angel-Caraza, J.; Diez-Prieto, I.; Pérez-García, C.C.; García-Rodríguez, M.B. Composition of lower urinary tract stones in canines in Mexico City. Urol. Res. 2010, 38, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mendoza-Lopez, C.I.; Del-Angel-Caraza, J.; Ake-Chinas, M.A.; Quijano-Hernandez, I.A.; Barbosa-Mireles, M.A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in dogs from Guadalajara City, Mexico. Vet. Mexico 2019, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. White, E.G. Symposium on urolithiasis in the dog. I. Introduction and incidence. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1966, 7, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Weaver, A.D. Canine urolithiasis: Incidence, chemical composition and outcome of 100 cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1970, 11, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Clark, W.T. The distribution of canine urinary calculi and their recurrence following treatment. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1974, 15, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Allen, L.B.A.; Pratt, A.; Lulich, J.; Syme, H.M. Canine cystine urolithiasis: Investigation of cases identified in the United Kingdom. In Proceedings of the British Small Animal Veterinary Congress 2008, Birmingham, UK, 3–6 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rogers, K.D.; Jones, B.; Roberts, L.; Rich, M.; Montalto, N.; Beckett, S. Composition of uroliths in small domestic animals in the United Kingdom. Vet. J. 2011, 188, 228–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Roe, K.; Pratt, A.; Lulich, J.; Osborne, C.; Syme, H.M. Analysis of 14,008 uroliths from dogs in the UK over a 10-year period. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2012, 53, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hesse, A. Canine urolithiasis: Epidemiology and analysis of urinary calculi. J. Small Anim. Pract. 1990, 31, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hesse, A.; Orzekowsky, H.; Neiger, R. Urolithiasis in dogs-15,494 cases (1979–2007). Kleintierpraxis 2012, 57, 633–639. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hesse, A.; Hoffmann, J.; Orzekowsky, H.; Neiger, R. Canine cystine urolithiasis: A review of 1760 submissions over 35 years (1979–2013). Can. Vet. J. Rev. Vet. Can. 2016, 57, 277–281. [Google Scholar]
  56. Breu, D.; Stieger, N.; Müller, E. Auftreten von Harnsteinen—Alters-, rasse- und geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede bei Hunden aus Deutschland. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2021, 49, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Escolar, E.; Bellanato, J.; Medina, J.A. Structure and composition of canine urinary calculi. Res. Vet. Sci. 1990, 49, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Riesgo, A.; Giménez, J.C.; Fermín Rodríguez, M.L.; García-Real, M.I.; Ruíz, M.J.; Daza, M.A. Retrospective study (2004–2017) of 137 uroliths diagnosed at the Complutense Veterinary Teaching Hospital. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 1093. [Google Scholar]
  59. Vrabelova, D.; Silvestrini, P.; Ciudad, J.; Gimenez, J.C.; Ballesteros, M.; Puig, P.; Ruiz de Gopegui, R. Analysis of 2735 canine uroliths in Spain and Portugal. A retrospective study: 2004–2006. Res. Vet. Sci. 2011, 91, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Tomé, M.; Gonçalves, S.; Duarte Correia, J.H.; Pomba, C. Canine and feline urolithiasis in Portugal: A retrospective study 2004–2006. In Proceedings of the 17th ECVIM-CA Congress, Budapest, Hungary, 13–15 September 2007. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sosnar, M.; Bulkova, T.; Ruzicka, M. Epidemiology of canine urolithiasis in the Czech Republic from 1997 to 2002. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2005, 46, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kučera, J.; Kořistková, T. Dynamics of urolithiasis in dogs in the Czech Republic between 2003 and 2016. Veterinářství 2017, 67, 419–421. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mircean, M.; Giurgiu, G.; Mircean, V.; Katsaros, K. Epidemiologic, clinic and ethiopathogenic studies in canine urolithiasis. Bull. Univ. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. Cluj. Napoca 2006, 63, 337–342. [Google Scholar]
  64. Blavier, A.; Sulter, A.; Bogey, A.; Novelli, K.; Billiemaz, B. Résultats des analyses par spectrométrie infrarouge de 1131 calculs urinaires canins prélevés de 2007 à 2010, en France. Prat. Méd. Chir. l’Anim. Cie. 2012, 47, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Méric, T.; Sulter, A.; Bogey-Lambert, A.; Blavier, A.; Nelaton, C.; Canonne Guibert, M.; Manassero, M.; Benchekroun, G.; Maurey, C. Retrospective study of cystinic lithiasis in dogs in France. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2020, 34, 3151. [Google Scholar]
  66. Bende, B.; Kovács, K.B.; Solymosi, N.; Németh, T. Characteristics of urolithiasis in the dog population of Hungary from 2001 to 2012. Acta Vet. Hung. 2015, 63, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Brandenberger-Schenk, F.; Rothenanger, E.; Reusch, C.E.; Gerber, B. Uroliths of dogs in Switzerland from 2003 to 2009. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 2015, 157, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Lund, H.S.; Thoresen, S.I. Increase in canine cystine urolithiasis in Norway. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2020, 34, 3152. [Google Scholar]
  69. Burggraaf, N.D.; Westgeest, D.B.; Corbee, R.J. Analysis of 7866 feline and canine uroliths submitted between 2014 and 2020 in the The Netherlands. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 137, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Jones, B.R.; Kirkman, J.H.; Hogan, J.; Holmes, S. Analysis of uroliths from cats and dogs in New Zealand, 1993–1996. N. Z. Vet. J. 1998, 46, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hunprasit, V.; Osborne, C.A.; Schreiner, P.J.; Bender, J.B.; Lulich, J.P. Epidemiologic evaluation of canine urolithiasis in Thailand from 2009 to 2015. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 115, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Minnesota Urolith Center. 2020 Minnesota Urolith Center Global Data. Available online: https://www.vetmed.umn.edu/sites/vetmed.umn.edu/files/2020globaldata.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2021).
  73. Trevejo, R.; Yang, M.Y.; Lund, E.M. Epidemiology of surgical castration of dogs and cats in the United States. JAVMA J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2011, 238, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kubinyi, E.; Turcsan, B.; Miklosi, A. Dog and owner demographic characteristics and dog personality trait associations. Behav. Process. 2009, 81, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. O’Neill, D.G.; James, H.; Brodbelt, D.C.; Church, D.B.; Pergram, C. Prevalence of commonly diagnosed disorders in UK dogs under primary veterinary care: Results and applications. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Osborne, C.A.; Sanderson, S.L.; Lulich, J.P.; Bartges, J.W.; Ulrich, J.K.; Koehler, L.A.; Bird, K.A.; Swanson, L.L. Canine cystine urolithiasis. Cause, detection, treatment, and prevention. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 1999, 29, 193–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ling, G.V.; Franti, C.E.; Ruby, A.L.; Johnson, D.L. Urolithiasis in dogs II: Breed prevalence, and interrelations of breed, sex, age, and mineral composition. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1998, 59, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  78. Kučera, J.; Kořistková, T. Epidemiologic characteristics of 442 cases of cystinuria in dogs. Veterinářství 2018, 68, 831–835. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ercolani, M.; Sahota, A.; Schuler, C.; Yang, M.; Evan, A.P.; Reimer, D.; Barone, J.G.; Tischfield, J.A.; Levin, R.M. Bladder outlet obstruction in male cystinuria mice. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2010, 42, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ling, G.V.; Franti, C.E.; Johnson, D.L.; Ruby, A.L. Urolithiasis in dogs III: Prevalence of urinary tract infection and interrelations of infection, age, sex, and mineral composition. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1998, 59, 643–649. [Google Scholar]
  81. Koehler, L.A.; Osborne, C.A.; Buettner, M.T.; Lulich, J.P.; Behnke, R. Canine uroliths: Frequently asked questions and their answers. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 2009, 39, 161–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bovee, K.C. Canine cystine urolithiasis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1986, 16, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Weichselbaum, R.C.; Feeney, D.A.; Jessen, C.R.; Osborne, C.A.; Koehler, L.; Ulrich, L. Evaluation of the morphologic characteristics and prevalence of canine urocystoliths from a regional urolith center. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1998, 59, 379–387. [Google Scholar]
  84. Bovee, K.C.; McGuire, T. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of uroliths in dogs: Definitive determination of chemical type. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1984, 185, 983–987. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Brand, E.; Harris, M.M.; Biloon, S. Cystinuria: The excretion of a cystine complex which decomposes in the urine with the liberation of free cystine. J. Biol. Chem. 1930, 86, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Osborne, C.A.; Lulich, J.P. Canine Cystine. Available online: https://vetmed.umn.edu/sites/vetmed.umn.edu/files/canine_cystine_uroliths.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
  87. Hoppe, A.; Denneberg, T.; Jeppsson, J.O.; Kagedal, B. Urinary excretion of amino acids in normal and cystinuric dogs. Br. Vet. J. 1993, 149, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hoppe, A.; Denneberg, T. Cystinuria in the dog: Clinical studies during 14 years of medical treatment. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2001, 15, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Hoppe, A.; Denneberg, T.; Jeppsson, J.O.; Kagedal, B. Canine cystinuria: An extended study on the effects of 2-mercaptopropionylglycine on cystine urolithiasis and urinary cystine excretion. Br. Vet. J. 1993, 149, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lulich, J.P.; Berent, A.C.; Adams, L.G.; Westropp, J.L.; Bartges, J.W.; Osborne, C.A. ACVIM Small Animal Consensus Recommendations on the Treatment and Prevention of Uroliths in Dogs and Cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2016, 30, 1564–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Langston, C.; Gisselman, K.; Palma, D.; McCue, J. Methods of urolith removal. Compendium 2010, 32, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  92. Queau, Y. Nutritional Management of Urolithiasis. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2019, 49, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Stevenson, A.E.; Hynds, W.K.; Markwell, P.J. Effect of dietary moisture and sodium content on urine composition and calcium oxalate relative supersaturation in healthy miniature schnauzers and labrador retrievers. Res. Vet. Sci. 2003, 74, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Norman, R.W.; Manette, W.A. Dietary restriction of sodium as a means of reducing urinary cystine. J. Urol. 1990, 143, 1193–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Moussa, M.; Papatsoris, A.G.; Chakra, M.A.; Moussa, Y. Update on cystine stones: Current and future concepts in treatment. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 2020, 9, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lotz, M.; Potts, J.T.; Holland, J.M.; Kiser, W.S.; Bartter, F.C. D-penicillamine therapy in cystinuria. J. Urol. 1966, 95, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Langlois, D.K.; Lehner, A.F.; Buchweitz, J.P.; Ross, D.E.; Johnson, M.B.; Kruger, J.M.; Bailie, M.B.; Hauptman, J.G.; Schall, W.D. Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of d-Penicillamine in Fasted and Nonfasted Dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2013, 27, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Prot-Bertoye, C.; Lebbah, S.; Daudon, M.; Tostivint, I.; Jais, J.P.; Garcia, A.; Pontoizeau, C.; Cochat, P.; Bataille, P.; Bridoux, F.; et al. Adverse events associated with currently used medical treatments for cystinuria and treatment goals: Results from a series of 442 patients in France. BJU Int. 2019, 124, 849–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Osborne, C.A.; Lulich, J.P.; Unger, L.K. Canine and feline urolithiasis: Relationship of etiopathogenesis to treatment and prevention. In Canine and Feline Nephrology and Urology; Osborne, C.A., Finco, D., Eds.; Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1995; Volume 1195, pp. 798–888. [Google Scholar]
  100. Kallistratos, G.; Fenner, O.; Berg, U. Cystinuria and L-cystine lithiasis in dogs. Experientia 1973, 29, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hoppe, A.; Denneberg, T.; Emanuelsson, B.M.; Kagedal, B.; Lindgren, S. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of 2-mercaptopropionylglycine administered intravenously and orally in dogs. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 1991, 14, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hoppe, A.; Denneberg, T.; Kagedal, B. Treatment of clinically normal and cystinuric dogs with 2-mercaptopropionylglycine. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1988, 49, 923–928. [Google Scholar]
  103. Osborne, C.A.; Polzin, D.J.; Lulich, J.P.; Kruger, J.M.; Johnston, G.R.; O’Brien, T.D.; Felice, L.J. Relationship of nutritional factors to the cause, dissolution, and prevention of canine uroliths. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 1989, 19, 583–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hoppe, A.; Denneberg, T.; Frank, A.; Kagedal, B.; Petersson, L.R. Urinary excretion of metals during treatment with D-penicillamine and 2-mercaptopropionylglycine in normal and cystinuric dogs. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 1993, 16, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Giger, U.; Lee, J.W.; Fitzgerald, C.; Lin, J.; Erat, A.; Sewell, A.C.; Henthorn, P.S. Characterization of non-type I cystinuria in Irish Terriers. In Proceedings of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Forum, Denver, CO, USA, 15–18 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  106. Rimer, J.D.; An, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Lee, M.H.; Goldfarb, D.S.; Wesson, J.A.; Ward, M.D. Crystal growth inhibitors for the prevention of L-cystine kidney stones through molecular design. Science 2010, 330, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Lee, M.H.; Sahota, A.; Ward, M.D.; Goldfarb, D.S. Cystine growth inhibition through molecular mimicry: A new paradigm for the prevention of crystal diseases. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2015, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Zee, T.; Bose, N.; Zee, J.; Beck, J.N.; Yang, S.; Parihar, J.; Yang, M.; Damodar, S.; Hall, D.; O’Leary, M.N.; et al. Alpha-Lipoic acid treatment prevents cystine urolithiasis in a mouse model of cystinuria. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 288–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mohammadi, M.; Shohani, A.; Khorami, H.; Mahdavi, K.N.; IzadPanahi, M.H.; Alizadeh, F.; Azizi, M. The effect of selenium supplementation on cystine crystal volume in patients with cystinuria. Biomedicine 2018, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Bai, Y.; Tang, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Cao, D.; Han, P.; Wang, J. Tolvaptan treatment of cystine urolithiasis in a mouse model of cystinuria. World J. Urol. 2021, 39, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Nelson, C.P.; Kurtz, M.P.; Venna, A.; Cilento, B.G., Jr.; Baum, M.A. Pharmacological dilutional therapy using the vasopressin antagonist tolvaptan for young patients with cystinuria: A pilot investigation. Urology 2020, 144, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Osborne, C.A.; Clinton, C.W.; Brunkow, H.C.; Frost, A.P.; Johnston, G.R. Epidemiology of naturally occurring feline uroliths and urethral plugs. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 1984, 14, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Osborne, C.A.; Lulich, J.P.; Thumchai, R.; Ulrich, L.K.; Koehler, L.A.; Bird, K.A.; Bartges, J.W. Feline urolithiasis. Etiology and pathophysiology. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small. Anim. Pract. 1996, 26, 217–232. [Google Scholar]
  114. Cannon, A.B.; Westropp, J.L.; Ruby, A.L.; Kass, P.H. Evaluation of trends in urolith composition in cats: 5,230 cases (1985-2004). JAVMA J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2007, 231, 570–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Houston, D.M.; Moore, A.E.; Favrin, M.G.; Hoff, B. Feline urethral plugs and bladder uroliths: A review of 5484 submissions 1998–2003. Can. Vet. J. Rev. Vet. Can. 2003, 44, 974–977. [Google Scholar]
  116. Houston, D.M.; Vanstone, N.P.; Moore, A.E.; Wesse, H.E.; Weese, J.S. Evaluation of 21426 feline bladder urolith submissions to the Canadian Veterinary Urolith Centre (1998–2014). Can. Vet. J. 2016, 57, 196–201. [Google Scholar]
  117. Schenk, F.; Rothenanger, E.; Reusch, C.; Gerber, B. Analysis of 855 feline and 468 canine uroliths in Switzerland between 2002 and 2009. In Proceedings of the 20th ECVIM-CA Congress, Toulouse, France, 9–11 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  118. Hunprasit, V.; Pusoonthornthum, P.; Koehler, L.; Lulich, J.P. Epidemiologic evaluation of feline urolithiasis in Thailand from 2010 to 2017. Thai J. Vet. Med. 2019, 49, 101–105. [Google Scholar]
  119. Dibartola, S.P.; Chew, D.J.; Horton, M.L. Cystinuria in a cat. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1991, 198, 102–104. [Google Scholar]
  120. Osborne, C.A.; Lulich, J.; Sanderson, S.; Rogers, Q.; Giger, U. Feline cystine urolithiasis—18 cases. Feline Pr. 1999, 27, 31–32. [Google Scholar]
  121. Mizukami, K.; Raj, K.; Osborne, C.; Giger, U. Cystinuria Associated with Different SLC7A9 Gene Variants in the Cat. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Mizukami, K.; Raj, K.; Giger, U. Feline Cystinuria Caused by a Missense Mutation in the SLC3A1 Gene. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015, 29, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Hilton, S.; Mizukami, K.; Giger, U. Cystinuria caused by a SLC7A9 missense mutation in Siamese-crossbred littermates in Germany. Tierarztl. Prax. Ausg. K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2017, 45, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Osborne, C.A.; Lulich, J.P. Feline Cystine. Available online: https://vetmed.umn.edu/sites/vetmed.umn.edu/files/feline_cystine_uroliths.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
Figure 1. Solubility of cystine at different urinary pH values [34,35].
Figure 1. Solubility of cystine at different urinary pH values [34,35].
Animals 11 02437 g001
Figure 2. Various canine cystine uroliths obtained via cystotomy. They are usually small, round or ovoid, and light yellow to yellowish brown, tan or reddish brown color.
Figure 2. Various canine cystine uroliths obtained via cystotomy. They are usually small, round or ovoid, and light yellow to yellowish brown, tan or reddish brown color.
Animals 11 02437 g002
Figure 3. Canine cystine crystals as colorless hexagonal plates in unstained urine sediment ((a,b)–surrounded by erythrocytes, (c)–surrounded by leukocytes and struvite crystal).
Figure 3. Canine cystine crystals as colorless hexagonal plates in unstained urine sediment ((a,b)–surrounded by erythrocytes, (c)–surrounded by leukocytes and struvite crystal).
Animals 11 02437 g003
Table 1. Classification system for cystinuria according to Brons et al. 2013 [26].
Table 1. Classification system for cystinuria according to Brons et al. 2013 [26].
PhenotypeType I-AType II-AType II-BType III
Mode of inheritanceAutosomal recessiveAutosomal dominantAutosomal dominantSex limited
GeneSLC3A1SLC3A1SLC7A9Undetermined
SexMales and femalesMales and femalesMales and femalesIntact adult males
Androgen dependenceNoNoNoYes
COLA
μmol/g creatinine *
homozygous≥8000≥8000 ≤4000
heterozygous≤500≥3000≥700
BreedsNewfoundland
Landseer
Labrador
Australian Cattle DogMiniature PincherMastiff and related breeds
Scottish Deerhound
Irish Terrier
* normal ≤ 500 μmol/g creatinine.
Table 2. Prevalence of cystine urolithiasis in dogs by region and characteristics of affected dogs in various studies.
Table 2. Prevalence of cystine urolithiasis in dogs by region and characteristics of affected dogs in various studies.
LocationAuthorMethod of
Analysis
YearsTotal NumberCystine UrolithsSexAgeBreeds
America
United StatesLing and Ruby (1986) [36]quantitative1981–198481321 (2.6%)20 males
1 female
United StatesCase et al. (1992) [37]crystallography1981–19895375107 (2.0%)106 males
1 female
mean 4.5 yearsAustralian Cattle Dog, Mastiff,
English Bulldog
United StatesOsborne et al. (1999) [38]quantitative including infrared spectroscopy1981–199777,191760 (1%) a
United StatesOsborne et al. (2009) [39]quantitative including infrared spectroscopy1981–2007451,8913 402 (0.8%)
United StatesLow et al. (2010) [40]crystallography1985–200625,499320 (1.3%)313 males
7 females
English Bulldog (OR 44.2), Newfoundland (OR 12.6), Dachshund (OR 7.6), Chihuahua (OR 5.6), Miniature Pinscher (OR 9.3), Welsh Corgi (OR 5.0) b
United StatesKopecny et al. (2021) [41]quantitative2006–201810,444279 (2.7%)273 males (192 intact males)
5 females
Mastiff (OR 52.7), Australian Cattle Dog (OR 30.8), Pitbull Terrier (OR 12.9), Rottweiler (OR 11.9), English Bulldog (OR 10.1), Bulldog (OR 9.1) c
Females: Pitbull Terrier, crossbreed, Newfoundland
CanadaHouston et al. (2004) [42]crystallography (+another
quantitative methods) d
1998–200316,64759 (0.4%)58 males
1 female
mean in males 4.3 years Female–4 years oldEnglish Bulldog, Newfoundland, Chihuahua, Rottweiler, Scottish Deerhound
CanadaHouston and Moore (2009) [43]crystallography (+ another
quantitative methods) d
1998–200840,637115 (0.3%) e
CanadaHouston et al. (2017) [44]crystallography (+ another
quantitative methods) d
1998–201479,965480 (0.6%) fsignificantly more frequent in males Scottish Deerhound, Whippet, Newfoundland
MexicoDel Angel-Caraza et al. (2010) [45]quantitative 1051 (1%)male4–6 years
MexicoMendoza-Lopez et al. (2019) [46]quantitative 1950
Europe
UKWhite (1966) [47]chemical
methods
1st series 194410318 (18%)males Corgi, Dachshund
2nd series 1961–1966737114 (15.5%)males
UK
(Scotland)
Weaver (1970) [48]chemical
methods
1961–196810020 (20%)malesmean 5.3 yearsBasset Hound, Irish Terrier
UKClark (1974)
[49]
X-ray diffraction 11024 (22%)males4.9 ± 2.03 years
UKAllen et al. (2008) [50]quantitative g2002–200611,027348 (3.2%)347 males
1 female
mean 73 monthsStaffordshire Bull Terrier
UKRogers et al. (2011) [51] 2002–20105591180 (3.2%)males
UKRoe et al. (2012) [52]quantitative g1997–200614,008424 (3%)more common in malesmajority at the age 36–72 monthsEnglish bulldog (OR 60.88), Staffordshire Bull Terrier (OR 8.71), Rottweiler (OR 6.99), Jack Russel Terrier (OR 2.32) h
GermanyHesse (1990) [53] 1731387 (22.4%) Dachshund, Munsterlander, Irish Terrier
Germany Hesse et al. (2012) [54] 1979–200715,4941491 (9.9%) i1476 males
15 females
6.0 ± 2.5 yearsDachshund, Dobermann Pinscher, Poodle, Cocker spaniel, Schnauzer, Yorkshire Terrier, Pekingese, Shih-tzu, Dalmatian
GermanyHesse et al. (2016) [55] 1979–201320,3161760 (8.7%)1741 males
19 females
5.9 ± 2.5
GermanyBreu et al. (2021) [56] 2017–20192772421 (15.2%)Males: 324 intact,
61 castrated
Females:
6 intact
4 castrated j
median 5 yearsFrench Bulldogs, Bulldogs, Chihuahua, Dachshund
SpainEscolar et al. (1990) [57] 17144 (26%)males
SpainRiesgo et al. (2018) [58]quantitative g2004–20171169 (7.8%)males2–12 yearsBasset Hound
Spain and Portugal Vrabelova et al. (2011) [59]quantitative g2004–2006276587 (3%)86 males
1 female
Bulldogs
Portugal Tomé et al. (2007) [60]quantitative g2004–200629920 (6.7%)
Czech
Republic
Sosnar et al. (2005) [61]infrared
spectroscopy
1997–2002136677 (5.6%)45 males k Dachshund
Basset Hound
Czech
Republic
Kučera and Kořistková (2017) [62]infrared
spectroscopy
2003–201680341 (5.1%)
RomaniaMircean et al. (2006) [63]infrared
spectroscopy
2005–2006202 (10%)males
FranceBlavier et al. (2012) [64]infrared
spectroscopy
2007–2010113142 (3.7%)
FranceMéric et al. (2020) [65] 2054183 (8.9%)182 males1 female English Bulldog, American Staffordshire Terrier, French Bulldog, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, Dachshunds
HungaryBende et al. (2015) [66]infrared
spectroscopy
2001–20122543108 (4.2%)96 males l58 ± 31.3 monthsBasset Hound (OR 40.2), Bulldog (OR 18.6), Rottweiler (OR 13.9), Min. Pinscher (OR 12.7), Wirehaired Dachshund (OR 7.6), Dachshund (OR 6.5), Chihuahua (OR 4.8) m
SwitzerlandBrandenberger-Schenk et al. (2015) [67]quantitative g2003–200949017 (3%)malesmedian 3.9 years (range 0.6–10.1)English Bulldog
NorwayLund and Thoresen (2020) [68] 2010–201968497 (14.2%) nMales:
91 intact,
2 castrated
Females:
3 intact
1 castrated
The NetherlandsBurggraaf et al. (2021) [69]quantitative2014–20204369601 (13.8%)593 males (455 intact, 138 neutered)
8 females (2 intact, 6 neutered)
American Staffordshire Terrier, Basset Hound, Chihuahua, English Bulldog, French Bulldog, Miniature Pinscher, Rottweiler, Dachshund, Yorkshire Terrier
Asia and Oceania
New ZealandJones et al. (1998) [70]X-ray diffraction1993–199631624 (7.6%)
ThailandHunprasit et al. (2017) [71]quantitative g2009–20158560136 (1.6%)126 males
2 females o
4.8 ± 2.4Chihuahua, French Bulldog,
Shih-tzu,
Miniature Pinscher
a The prevalence of cystine urolithiasis decreased during the period. b OR = odds ratio. Odds ratio was calculated by logistic regression analysis by comparing breed distributions in dogs with cysteine urolithiasis with breed distributions of 2 groups (dogs with other urolith types and dogs examined at the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital at the University of California during the same period as the study). c OR = odds ratio. Odds ratio was calculated by logistic regression analysis by comparing breed distributions in dogs with individual urolith type to mixed breed dogs with the same mineral type. d X-ray microanalysis, infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy. e Significant decrease of cystine urolith prevalence during the study period. f Significant increase of cystine urolith prevalence during the study period. g Uroliths were analyzed in Minnesota Urolith Centre. h OR = odds ratio. Chi-squared tests were performed to assess whether particular breeds were over-represented among the dogs forming cystine uroliths compared with the national insurance company database. i The prevalence of cystine gradually decreased from 27% between the years 1979–1985 to 5.5% in period from 2000 to 2007. j In 26 cases, the sex was not reported. k Sex was reported in 45 cases only. l In 12 cases, the sex was not provided. m OR = odds ratio. Odds ratio was calculated by logistic regression analysis by comparing of the dogs with cystine uroliths to general population of dogs in Hungary according to the Hungarian Microchip Register. n A gradual increase in cystine uroliths was noted (from 12% in 2010 to 30% in 2018). o In 6 cases, the sex was not reported.
Table 3. The list of canine breeds where cystinuria was reported [20,36,37,44,47,48,55,56,57,65,70,76,77,78].
Table 3. The list of canine breeds where cystinuria was reported [20,36,37,44,47,48,55,56,57,65,70,76,77,78].
Canine Breeds
AfghanFrench BulldogPug
Akita InuGerman BraquePuli
Alaskan MalamuteGolden RetrieverRat Terrier
American Staffordshire TerrierGreat DaneRottweiler
Australian Cattle DogHuskyRough Collie
Australian Shepherd DogChihuahuaSaluki
Australian TerrierIrish TerrierSamoyed
BasenjiJack Russel TerrierScottish Deerhound
Basset HoundKromfohrländerScottish Terrier
Bichon FriseLabrador RetrieverSetter
Border CollieLandseerShetland Collie
BorzoiLhasa ApsoShetland Sheepdog
BoxerMalteseShih Tzu
Brussels GriffonMastiffSchnauzer
Bull MastiffMiniature PinscherSilky Terrier
Cairn TerrierMiniature PoodleStaffordshire Bull Terrier
Cavalier King Charles SpanielMiniature SchnauzerStaffordshire Terrier
Cocker SpanielMunsterlanderSwedish Lapphund
DachshundNewfoundlandTibetian Spaniel
DalmatianOld English SheepdogWelsh Corgi
DobermannPekingeseWest Highland White Terrier
DreverPitbull TerrierWhippet
English BulldogPointerYorkshire Terrier
Fox TerrierPoodle
Table 4. Prevalence of cystine urolithiasis in cats by region and characteristics of affected cats in various studies.
Table 4. Prevalence of cystine urolithiasis in cats by region and characteristics of affected cats in various studies.
LocationAuthorYearsTotal NumberCystine UrolithsSexAgeBreeds
America
United StatesOsborne et al. (1984) [112] 3280
United StatesOsborne et al. (1996) [113] 948126 (0.3%)17 males
6 females
3.2 years (range 4 months–11 years)DSH, DLH, Siamese, Korat
United StatesCannon et al. (2007) [114]1985–200452307 (0.1%)3 males
4 females
4× DSH
United StatesOsborne et al. (2009) [39]1981–200794,77692 (0.1%)
United StatesKopecny et al. (2021) [41]2005–201839402 (0.05%)
CanadaHouston et al. (2003) [115]1998–20034866 uroliths
618 urethral plugs
5 uroliths (0.1%)
1 plug (0.2%)
CanadaHouston et al. (2009) [43]1998–200811,35311 (0.1%)
CanadaHouston et al. (2016) [116]1998–201421,42620 (0.1%)
Europe
SpainEscolar et al. (2003) [57] 340
PortugalTomé et al. (2007) [60]2004–2006650
SwitzerlandSchenk et al. (2010) [117]2002–20098552 (0.2%)
SpainRiesgo et al. (2018) [58]2004–2017210
The NetherlandsBurggraaf et al. (2021) [69]2014–202034974 (0.1%)3 males
1 female
Asia and Oceania
New ZealandJones et al. (1998) [70]1993–1996530
ThailandHunprasit et al. (2019) [118]2010–20179237 (0.8%)4 males
3 females
6× DSH
1× Persian
DSH–Domestic Short-haired cat, DLH–Domestic Long-haired cat.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kovaříková, S.; Maršálek, P.; Vrbová, K. Cystinuria in Dogs and Cats: What Do We Know after Almost 200 Years? Animals 2021, 11, 2437. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082437

AMA Style

Kovaříková S, Maršálek P, Vrbová K. Cystinuria in Dogs and Cats: What Do We Know after Almost 200 Years? Animals. 2021; 11(8):2437. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kovaříková, Simona, Petr Maršálek, and Kateřina Vrbová. 2021. "Cystinuria in Dogs and Cats: What Do We Know after Almost 200 Years?" Animals 11, no. 8: 2437. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082437

APA Style

Kovaříková, S., Maršálek, P., & Vrbová, K. (2021). Cystinuria in Dogs and Cats: What Do We Know after Almost 200 Years? Animals, 11(8), 2437. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop