Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Biological Factors on Haematological Values in Wild Marsh Harrier (Circus aeruginosus) Nestlings
Next Article in Special Issue
Respiratory Disease Risk of Zoo-Housed Bonobos Is Associated with Sex and Betweenness Centrality in the Proximity Network
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Lecithin Supplementation on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Lipid Metabolism, and Cecum Microbiota of Broilers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Infant Presence on Social Networks of Sterilized and Intact Wild Female Balinese Macaques (Macaca fascicularis)

1
Research Unit SPHERES, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Sciences, University of Liège, 4020 Liège, Belgium
2
Department of Ecology, Physiology and Ethology, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, 67200 Strasbourg, France
3
Research Unit FARAH, Equine and Companion Animal Reproduction Pathologies Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Sart-Tilman, 4130 Liège, Belgium
4
Primate Division of Natural Resources and Environment Research Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar 80361, Bali, Indonesia
5
Research Unit FOCUS, Department of Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Sciences, University of Liège, 4020 Liège, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(9), 2538; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092538
Submission received: 30 July 2021 / Revised: 24 August 2021 / Accepted: 26 August 2021 / Published: 29 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Use of Social Network Analysis to Evaluate Animal Welfare)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In primates, social interactions are significantly influenced by the female reproductive cycle and the presence of infants. In particular, unweaned infants act as amplifiers of social interactions: they facilitate contact between group members while also triggering occasional conflicts. Sterilized females no longer having young offspring could see their social integration modified. We studied intact and recently sterilized wild female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) to see if infant presence was influencing the females’ place and role in the social group. We used the social network analysis tool to compare grooming and proximity to other females for females in three nursing conditions (with young infant (YI), with old infant (OI), and non-nursing (NN). YI females were less involved in grooming but stayed in closer proximity to other females than OI and NN females. We suggest that YI females keeping proximity to others was a way to maximize their infants’ protection, while avoiding too direct social interactions, such as grooming, to protect them from kidnapping risk. Overall, sterilization did not deteriorate female social integration, at least shortly after the surgery. Further research should track the social status of non-nursing females over a long time period, in aid of making sound population management decisions.

Abstract

Contraception is increasingly used to control wild animal populations. However, as reproductive condition influences social interactions in primates, the absence of new offspring could influence the females’ social integration. We studied two groups of wild macaques (Macaca fascicularis) including females recently sterilized in the Ubud Monkey Forest, Indonesia. We used social network analysis to examine female grooming and proximity networks and investigated the role of infant presence on social centrality and group connectivity, while controlling for the fertility status (sterilized N = 14, intact N = 34). We compared the ego networks of females experiencing different nursing conditions (young infant (YI) vs. old infant (OI) vs. non-nursing (NN) females). YI females were less central in the grooming network than other females while being more central in proximity networks, suggesting they could keep proximity within the group to protect their infant from hazards, while decreasing direct grooming interactions, involving potential risks such as kidnapping. The centrality of sterilized and intact females was similar, except for the proximity network where sterilized females had more partners and a better group connectivity. These results confirm the influence of nursing condition in female macaque social networks and did not show any negative short-term effects of sterilization on social integration.

1. Introduction

In social mammals, reproductive status and the mere presence of infants may influence social associations and interactions, those conditions being largely under hormonal processes [1,2,3]. Natal attraction and allo-parental behaviors are well spread in social species [4,5,6,7], especially in K-selected mammal species with low reproductive rates [8], allowing partners to socialize, which is particularly important for individual fitness [9,10]. In cercopithecine primates, unweaned infants are mediators and amplifiers of female social ties since they play a role in the biological market [11,12]. Studies have shown that attraction to infants and its influence on social bonds are species-specific. For example, within the macaque genus, females of different species are highly to moderately permissive with their infants and more or less tolerant toward females approaching them, particularly during the first month of the infant’s life [13,14]. Infant handling by group members is frequent and attraction for newborns is particularly significant for matrilineal primates such as macaques and baboons where mothers are often the focus of other females’ attention [6,7,15,16].
Whereas, former studies on this topic have been conducted at a dyadic level [6,7,11,13,15,17,18], some authors have suggested that infant presence might have a greater influence than expected at the group level [2,16]. In capuchins (Sapajus spp.) for example, infants improve the centrality of nursing females in the grooming network without enhancing their spatial or hierarchical positions [19]. Therefore, in nepotistic social systems such as macaques, infants and young offspring might play a key role in the mother’s centrality [19] and may play an extensive role in group social cohesion [20,21] if we assume that grooming a mother is a way to access young infants [11]. To shed light on this realm, social network analysis (SNA) is an efficient tool allowing us to depict relationships at the individual, group and population levels, and to understand the fitness implications of social relationships [22,23,24,25,26,27]. The group level allows for the differentiation between the social position and social role. The social role refers to the way an individual position influences or is influenced by the position of other social partners [28,29]. For example, it has been shown in baboons that juveniles contribute to the social structure of the overall group and influence the social role of subadult and adult females [21]. If dyadic level studies under-represent the social position and role of an individual within its group, the larger and more integrative picture provided by SNA tools allows us to deepen the study of social interaction patterns, the social position of individuals and their social roles within a group, and in turn, how the latter influences the former. SNA can focus on both ego network (the individual ‘ego’ as the actor of their own network [30]) and the individual position within the group, and is thus a perfect tool to assess changes in individuals’ direct and indirect social interactions related to specific factors. Therefore, SNA might help to test the hypothesis whereby infants play a crucial role in building and strengthening adult females’ social bonds, by analyzing the relationship between the presence of unweaned infants and the female’s centrality (social position) and connectivity (social role) within the network.
Sociality and welfare are closely linked in social species [31,32]. While animal welfare has been deeply investigated in farm and captive settings, studies in wild populations remain sparse [31,33]. It is particularly true in human-modified environments where people attempt to manage wild populations [33]. Changes induced by management strategies, such as birth control to control wildlife population growth, might impose additional costs to individuals’ social life and welfare [34]. Welfare is quantified through individual physiological and behavioral indicators but also through group-level related measures since individuals and the group influence each other [28,31,35]. The effect of sociality on individual fitness emphasizes the importance of studying potential changes in sociality related to animal sterilization and therefore the implications of wildlife management on welfare.
In some regions, wildlife sterilization is increasingly used [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], therefore modifying individual reproductive output, natality rate and ultimately demographic structure of the populations where the social life develops. So far, the possible impact of reproductive control on the social dynamics of free-ranging primates has been poorly investigated and deserves further attention [44]. Vasectomy and tubectomy keep intact the steroid hormonal functions underpinning normal sexual activity, while impeding fecundation [45,46,47,48]. However, the behavioral implications of these techniques in wild primates remain poorly explored. SNA can be used to predict or assess the effects of birth control on social network structure and social dynamics [22], and to understand the short and long-term implications of sterilization on individual fitness and sociality in primates.
The purpose of this analysis was to assess, using social network analysis, the potential role of unweaned infants on female social dynamics in two macaque groups recently subjected to a birth control program using fallopian tube ligation (tubectomy) in the Ubud Monkey Forest, Bali, Indonesia [43]. This paper investigated the short-term implications of sterilization since most of the studied sterilized females (12/14) were neutered since less than one year. How the absence of an unweaned infant might impact the sterilized females is particularly important to understand how birth control programs influence primate social dynamics. Considering that unweaned infants are particularly attractive to the mother’s female partners [6,7,15,16], we expected that females nursing a young infant (YI) or an old infant (OI) would be more central and better connected in the affiliative networks than the non-nursing females (NN). This hypothesis means that the YI and the OI females would have a higher number of female neighbors, a stronger weight of connections through frequency or time duration spent interacting or associating, and a higher group connectivity power in comparison to NN females, and that this effect could vary with the age of the infant. In chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), YI females are attracted to other YI females, but this attraction declines with the infant age [6,18]. We therefore expected a gradient related to infant age: YI females would be in the most central position in the group, this centrality decreasing as the infant grows older, to end in a less central position when the infant is weaned, i.e., in NN females. Similarly, we predicted that YI females would play a central role in the connectivity of the female network (high quality of social partners themselves well connected), followed by OI females and ultimately by NN females. Considering the fertile status of the females, most of the sterilized females in our study were treated from less than one year (<1 year N = 12; >1 year N = 2) and some of them were still nursing an infant during a part of the study (N = 2). Knowing the average 1.1 years of birth interval in this species [49], we therefore expected no negative short-term influence of the sterilized status on the centrality and connectivity power of the females, particularly considering that no hormonal disfunction was expected following the tubectomy procedure [45,47]. This study aimed to preliminarily assess the general influence of nursing condition and the potential short-term impact of sterilization on macaque social dynamics in order to enlighten the implications of sterilizations and strengthen our capacity to design high-quality management strategies promoting welfare in wild primate populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Study Groups

The Ubud Monkey Forest (8°31′ S, 155°15′ E) is a touristic forest sanctuary located in central Bali, Indonesia, where wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) have been living commensally with people for decades [50]. Monkeys are provisioned daily with fruits and vegetables by stakeholders [51,52], and there is only a low predation pressure left. The study site is densely populated with 54 individuals per hectare (Appendix A), for a total population of 1099 divided into eight social groups in 2020. Between 2017 and 2020, the average annual growth of this population was 12%, the average birth interval was 1.2 years with an average birth rate of 0.53. A three-year sterilization program using female endoscopic tubectomy was launched in 2017 to manage the macaque population growth and allowed the sterilization of 136 females in the population [43]. The present study was conducted on two of the eight social groups, called Michelin & Utara hereafter, for which we had the most detailed dataset. In March 2020, Michelin group counted 136 individuals in total, while Utara group counted 33 individuals (see Appendix A for the demographic composition of the study groups). However, the social data included in this study concern female network only, including 28 intact females and 13 sterilized females in Michelin, and 6 intact females and one sterilized female in Utara (Appendix B). All studied females were sexually mature thus likely to attempt to breed, and most of them experienced different nursing conditions over the course of the study (Appendix B).

2.2. Data Collection

Data were collected from August to September 2019 and from December 2019 to March 2020 by two observers, G. G. and a field assistant with a 90% inter-observer reliability [53]. The macaques were fully habituated to human presence and the visibility was excellent (2–10 m).

2.2.1. Determination of the Nursing Condition

As reproduction in this population is non-seasonal [54], female subjects experienced different nursing conditions over the study period. With a pregnancy period of approximatively 5.5 months in this species [55], we assessed the female nursing condition (NN, YI or OI) based on the date of birth of the female’s last infant. Infants were considered as weaned after one year when they ingested solid food and were competently independent during travelling and foraging [56]. Females–including intact and sterilized ones–who did not care for an unweaned infant were categorized as non-nursing females (NN). Except for infants born during the study, the exact age of infants were not known. As a result, we used the infant coat color change to define age class and thus female nursing condition: young infant (YI) with black-grey coat until ~5 months of age, and old infant (OI) with beige-brown coat until 1 year old [57]. With regard to the fertility status (sterilized vs. intact), this study started after the end of the sterilization campaign. However, most of the sterilized female subjects were contracepted within the previous year (N = 12; 86% of the sterilized females) and some were still nursing at some point of the study (N = 2) (see Appendix B for details of the study subjects).

2.2.2. Behavioral Data

We used 15-min focal sampling [58], with the Animal Behaviour Pro V.1.2. app [59] to collect a total of 202 h on the 41 females of the Michelin group (mean of 4.9 h/ind.) and 30 h of focal observation on the 7 females of the Utara group (mean of 4.3 h/ind.). Focal samples were done semi-randomly, i.e., based on the first-seen individual, independently from its activity, while giving priority to individuals having the lowest cumulative data. We collected duration and direction of grooming interactions as well as the identity of the focal interactor(s). To test our hypotheses related to nursing condition while controlling for the confounding effect of hierarchical rank [3,60,61,62], we calculated the rank on weighted matrices generated from unidirectional agonistic interactions (cf. “winner/looser”) with the modified David’s’ score [63,64] using the steepness R package [65]. We then standardized the hierarchical rank with the group size.
We supplemented focal sampling with scan samples [58] every 5 min to collect association data (frequencies) on contact- and ≤5 m proximity neighbors. Proximity scans done in food provisioning areas were excluded from the dataset to limit bias related to food competition. We got a total of 3099 proximity scans in Michelin group (mean of 76 scans/ind.) and 492 proximity scans in Utara group (mean of 70 scans/ind.).

2.2.3. Social Network Data

To build the female proximity and grooming networks, we compiled monthly undirected social matrices based on proximity frequencies, and directed social matrices based on duration of grooming interactions, respectively. We removed from the matrices all the non-focal individuals [66] and focal individuals who disappeared over the study. To take into account variation in sampling effort between focal individuals, we weighted the matrices with the total observation duration of each individual following Farine and Whitehead [26]. From the monthly matrices, we constructed the ego matrices considering only interactions with direct female social partners or proximity associations within 5 m around the ego individual during the whole study period [30] for each focal individual according to its nursing condition. Therefore, each focal female had as many ego matrices as different nursing conditions she experienced during the study (Appendix B).

2.3. Social Network Analysis

We focused on ego networks which show the local connections of an individual over time and how they differ to other ones [30]. We used several metrics to analyze the centrality and connectivity of focal subjects in the female grooming and proximity networks. At the individual level (the node), we used node’s direct interactions, meaning one step of distance from the ego node, such as the degree (number of social partners who interacted with the ego individual) [67] and the strength (the values–or number of interactions–of the node ties) [68] to weigh the relationships, and we considered the directionality when necessary (in- and out- degree/strength). Between local (individual) and global (group) characterization, we used node’s direct and indirect interactions through Laplacian centrality metric as an intermediate measure of a node centrality. This metric considers two steps of distance from the ego node, and thus attests of the role of the ego node in the group connectivity and cohesion by its suppression from the network [69]. To process the matrices, calculate and analyze the metrics, we used the R package ANTs [70] and we drew sociograms with NETDRAW, the graphic interface of UCINET 6 v. 6.678 [71].

Statistical Analysis

To test the influence of the nursing condition (YI vs. OI vs. NN females) and the fertility status (sterilized vs. intact) on individual centrality and group connectivity in the grooming and proximity networks, we ran separate generalized linear models (GLMMs) for each network metric as response variable (binomial family for degree and in-/out-degree transformed into proportions to control for the group size; Gaussian family for strength, in-/out-strength, and Laplacian centrality). For model construction, we included nursing condition as the main fixed predictor, fertility status, group size, hierarchical rank and their interactions as controlled fixed factors, and the group membership and the identity of individuals as random effects to account for the within-subject repeated observations. Likelihood ratio tests (LRT) were then used to compare the model including the various combination of effects, which allowed us to exclude non-significant effects (i.e., all interactions) and to limit the number of random effects to a minimum (group membership was removed). For the grooming network, we kept all the remaining fixed predictors (nursing condition, fertility status, rank, group size) in the models of in-strength, out-strength, and Laplacian centrality. However, we removed the hierarchical rank from the in-strength model because the deviance was more adapted without this predictor, although only marginally significant (LRT: deviance = −325.93, Df = 4, p = 0.06). We also compared the final models to their corresponding null models to test the joint significance of the remaining predictors.
All statistics were performed using R 4.0.3. software [72] and we checked for assumptions of model residual normality using Kolmogorov-Smirnov’s test. When the residual normality of the model was not respected (i.e., with Laplacian centrality and Strength metrics), we used the square root transformation. As inferential statistical techniques request, observations must be independent [28,73]. Since interaction data between same-group members broke this rule, we used the ANTs package [70] to permute our social networks prior to run GLMMs with a confidence interval set at 95%, as recommended by Whitehead [74] and Croft et al. [75] to obtain unbiased significance tests for the coefficients. More specifically, we used node label permutations (N = 10,000) on the metrics (argument ‘labels’ in function ‘perm.net.nl’) calculated from social matrices [76]. We ran Tukey post-hoc test using lsmeans package [77] to perform pairwise comparisons between nursing conditions.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Nursing Condition on Proximity and Grooming Networks

Partially in accordance with our predictions, we found that YI females were more frequently in contact (Figure 1a) and within 5 m of other females (Figure 1b) than OI and NN females, but had a lower number of contact partners compared to OI females (Figure 1c) (Table 1). Neither the number of neighbors (Figure 1d) in the 5 m-proximity network or the connectivity metric in both proximity networks (contact: Figure 1e; and 5 m: Figure 1f) differed significantly between the nursing conditions (Table 1). Whatever the proximity metrics tested, OI females did not significantly differ from NN females (Table 1).
For the grooming network, YI females were significantly less connected to the group than NN females, while not significantly different from OI females (Table 2). Contrary to the proximity network, we found no significant difference in grooming duration given and received between NN, YI and OI females. However, YI females groomed significantly fewer female partners than OI and NN females (Figure 2a). Similarly, YI females received grooming from a lower number of partners than OI females, but not so compared to NN females (Figure 2b). Whatever the grooming metrics tested, OI females did not significantly differ from NN females (Table 2).
Group size and hierarchical rank did not have any significant effect on the models of grooming network, whatever the SNA metric tested (Table 2). However, rank had an influence in proximity networks. The lower the hierarchical rank of a female (subordinate), the lower the frequency of time in contact with or at 5 m proximity from other females (Figure 1a,b, respectively), and the lower the number of female neighbors (Figure 1c,d, respectively) (Table 1). Finally, we found that the number of partners in 5 m proximity was smaller in Michelin (bigger) group than in Utara (smaller) group.

3.2. Effect of Sterilization on Grooming and Proximity Networks

We controlled for the potential short-term effect of sterilization by testing the fertility status on grooming and proximity networks of the females. In the grooming network, the sterilized females did not significantly differ from intact females, whatever the SNA metric tested (Table 2). Thus, in accordance with our prediction, the social position of sterilized females did not significantly differ than intact females (Figure 3).
Unexpectedly, in the 5 m proximity network, sterilized females had significantly more neighbors (Figure 4a) and were better spatially connected (Figure 4b) than intact females, while no significant differences occurred in the contact-proximity network (Table 1). Despite the differences observed for the number of neighbors and the spatial connectedness role, we found no significant differences between sterilized and intact females in their frequency of associations in both proximity networks (Figure 4c).

4. Discussion

As sterilization is increasingly used to manage wild primate populations in anthropogenic environments [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], understanding if and how neutering may impact primate behavior and social organization is urgent. One of the first avenues to explore this relies on the role of unweaned infants in female sociality at the group level as a way to foresee whether the persisting absence of new offspring could hamper the quality of sterilized female social integration, and eventually impact the social cohesion and group stability likely to lead to group fission. In cercopithecine species, females with newborns are often the focus of other females’ attention [6,7,15,16]. To explore this question, we conducted a preliminary study in two groups of Balinese long-tailed macaques shortly after a sterilization program [43] to assess the general role played by the nursing condition and the potential short-term impact of sterilization (fertility status) on the female social position and role within their grooming and proximity networks. We found that YI females were more central (i.e., more frequently in contact/5 m) than OI and NN females in their spatial proximity networks. Conversely, when considering grooming networks, YI females were surprisingly less central (i.e., lower number of female partners) than OI and NN females and less connected in comparison to NN females. Regarding the fertility status, we found that sterilization did not have any positive or negative impact on female macaques’ social integration, at least in a short term.

4.1. Females with Young Unweaned Infants Were Less Central than Expected

YI females received grooming from fewer female partners than OI females and OI females showed centrality position similar to non-nursing females. These results are not consistent with a study on capuchin monkeys showing an increased number of grooming partners in lactating females [19]. Our results suppose that YI females could either display active avoidance [78,79] or were actually less attractive than expected [6,7,15,16,19]. As this population shows a non-seasonal reproduction [54], infants were present through the study period and at a substantial rate in this provisioned population. Consequently, we suppose that the large number of infants available makes them less attractive than when infants are scarce in social groups [11,80]. In parallel, YI females also initiated grooming to fewer partners than other females did while they did not significantly differ in grooming durations they emitted. As the number of partners is lower while the total grooming duration is similar, each grooming bout initiated per partner would last necessarily longer. These results are consistent with studies in chacma baboons (P. ursinus) where females promote the quality of grooming patterns through their degree of kinship and the strength of their social bonds (strong or weak) in order to adapt their social strategy and improve their individual fitness [81,82]. In our study, YI female macaques could select their partners (i.e., favor strong bonds) towards the most trustworthy females when approaching their newborn [83]. Therefore, we hypothesize that the matrilineal membership could have an effect on the number of favored grooming partners of nursing females, depending on the size and the dominance rank of the matriline, since grooming is preferentially directed towards kin-related and high-ranking females [3]. Moreover, Liao et al. [20] showed that older individual rhesus macaques (M. mulatta) selectively allocate social interactions to specific partners while younger individuals interact with a higher number of social partners. Consistently, adult female Japanese macaques (M. fuscata) with maternal experience were globally less interested by other females’ infants, which means they were less susceptible to interact with nursing females [15]. Thus, taking into account the age of the female subjects, their matriline belonging and their level of maternal experience in future analyses could bring a complementary explanation to our results.
Another possible explanation may be found in social style, including mother permissiveness. In many cercopithecine species, females are less permissive and tolerant during the first month of their infant life [13], infants being susceptible to be harassed, kidnapped or fatally injured, especially in despotic species as a form of reproductive competition [84,85] and in high density populations [84,86] where the social environment is more risky [86]. Although not despotic, M. fascicularis is a hierarchical species, classified as grade 2 on the 4-grade scale of macaque social style and characterized by a low degree of mother permissiveness [14]. Moreover, the population in Ubud Monkey Forest has for years experienced high density conditions and social tension [87,88]. It has been shown that, in captive macaques, crowding conditions increase infant harassment and kidnapping and lead to adjustments in parental style [86]. Kidnappings are quite common in the study population where we witnessed 43 events–including 3 deaths of infants–over 3 years of observation (unpublished data). In these conditions, YI females could actively avoid potential harassers [78,79,84] by limiting their grooming interactions to a low number of partners, probably mostly kin-related and trustworthy females, in order to reduce exposure of their young infant to harassment and kidnapping [83,86]. This could explain why females were more selective in their social interactions during the first months of their infant life [13] to become more central again with the development of the infant.
Finally, the lower centrality of YI females in grooming network could also be explained by time allocation differences between nursing conditions. While caring for a young infant may be time-consuming, old infants progressively become independent [56], leaving more time to their mother for grooming other females [89], just like non-nursing females do. As the average birth interval in our population is 1.2 years and weaning occurs at approximatively 12 months [56], the non-nursing condition was relatively short compared to the nursing one. These conditions could conceal the expected differences between non-nursing and nursing females. As for their potential role in the group connectivity (one index of group cohesion), non-nursing females showed higher connectivity power than YI females, which is consistent with their higher centrality in the grooming network.
Through spatial associations, the analysis of the proximity networks brought interesting results: YI females were more spatially central than OI and NN females by staying more often close (contact, 5 m) to other females, even though they did not significantly differ in their connectivity role in the group. Maintaining a central spatial position within the group for YI females promotes the protection of the young from environmental hazards, as suggested in other animal populations [90,91].

4.2. Sterilization Did neither Positively nor Neatively Impact the Female Social Networks in a Short Term

Taking into consideration the short time interval between the sterilizations and our study, and the life history variables of the study species (i.e., average time for an infant to be weaned and inter-birth interval), we predicted that sterilized females would not significantly differ from intact females in terms of individual centrality and group connectivity in both grooming and proximity networks. As the selected surgical technique (tubectomy) preserves the gonads and hormonal functions, we did not expect direct short-term effects on social behaviors [42,45,47]. In accordance with our prediction, we did not notice any significant difference between sterilized and intact females’ grooming (Figure 3) and contact-proximity networks. However, the question of the long-term impact of sterilization is still pending. As most females had been sterilized for less than one year at the beginning of the study (Appendix B), a period corresponding to the average inter-birth interval of the species [49], the short time interval did not allow to test the effect of long-term absence of new offspring, which could translate in a strong attraction of sterilized females towards other females’ infants [6,7,15,16]. Some sterilized females were even still caring an infant during a part of the study (Appendix B). Given the small sample size of females sterilized since more than one year (N = 2) in our study, a longer-term follow-up of sterilized females on a larger sample size is necessary to test the long-term effect of reproduction cessation on female social network.
The 5 m proximity network showed that sterilized females had significantly more female neighbors and a better group connectivity than intact females. Sexual activities may account for this result. As tubectomized females keep cycling without becoming gravid [42,45,47], they are susceptible to keep mating on longer periods [92], staying close to reproductive males, just like intact cycling females do [93,94,95]. Consequently, in a context of intra-sexual competition, they would keep close (5 m proximity) to other females, in an attempt to stay in the vicinity of males. Future research including male-female relationships are in progress to verify this sexual competition hypothesis for mate access.

5. Conclusions

The role of juvenile individuals is known to influence the group structure [21] and the social organization in primates [20]. By using SNA, this study provides the first evaluation of unweaned infant role on female macaque social network dynamics, and by extension, what this role might imply for sterilized females. Female macaques with young infants were not more central in the grooming network but enhanced their spatial position, as probably adapting their parental style and social interaction patterns to the high density conditions as similarly suggested by Maestripieri [86]. This study also verifies the absence of short-term implications of sterilization: tubectomy has no immediate negative consequence on female social position.
With regards to the limitations of our study, social dynamic data on a longer period would be necessary to deepen our understanding of the effect of reproduction cessation. It would be interesting to increase the time elapsed between the sterilizations and the behavioral observations to document the consequences of the permanent absence of new offspring and investigate whether the inter-individual difference in time since having the last offspring would dissimilarly impact the females’ social network metrics. Moreover, as the exclusion of specific age or sex classes from network analysis may lead to biased interpretation of network structure [21], including males and juveniles in future analyses could allow to reach a more refined understanding of the infant role in the entire group dynamics. In complement, the measure of hormonal correlates of the ovarian cycle would allow to clarify the reproductive conditions of the non-nursing females and their influence on social behaviors to further identify the social importance of having or not an unweaned infant. Finally, the role of sexual competition [93,96] through changes in the operational sex ratio following birth control might have its importance as well and should be investigated in future studies.
Compiling further data on sterilization in primates has not only a fundamental interest to enhance our knowledge about animal social dynamics, but also a major applied interest to promote the most informed decisions and welfare-focused choices in management strategies of captive and wild primate populations. Social network analysis helps to assess group stability and changes following management decision [31,97]. Social instability detection may prevent social fragmentation or improve suitability of management actions. Combining the use of SNA with systematic welfare measures might help to anticipate and assess the consequences of human interventions [97,98]. Further studies should investigate correlation between welfare behavioral and physiological indicators and network measures of social cohesion and stability in the framework of reproduction control to identify structural dynamics increasing welfare [99]. Given the paucity of information currently available in this realm, we call for systematic monitoring and investigation of the sterilization-related questions by taking advantage of existing birth control programs in the wild and captive settings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, G.G. and F.B.; data collection, G.G.; data analyses, G.G., S.S. and A.H.; writing and editing, G.G. wrote the manuscript, F.B., M.-C.H., A.H. and S.D. provided deeply editorial advices; supervision and field work’s facilitation, I.N.W. and P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was fully funded by the Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS) under a Fund for Research Training in Industry and Agriculture (FRIA) grant.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was purely observational and non-invasive and was conducted under research permission from the Indonesian Ministry of Research and Technology (No. 39/EXT/SIP/FRP/E5/Dit.KI/VII/2018 and No. 53/E5/E5.4/SIP.EXT/2019). The research took advantage of an existing sterilization program which have been approved by the Animal Ethics Commission of Udayana University (No. 282/KE-PH/I/2017) and has been granted with permission of the Provincial Office of Conservation in Bali (BKSDA, No. S.538/BKSDA.BL-1/KK/7/2019; 571 Capture license: #29/PPSP/XII/2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the Indonesian Ministry of Research and Technology, the Ubud Monkey Forest Management Committee Nyoman Buana, Bagus and Wayan Buda for support and permission to conduct this research in Indonesia. We thank Fanny de Thier Nagelmackers for assistance with data collection. We greatly thank the Ubud Monkey Forest staff and Kadek Eva Suartini for logistical assistance. We acknowledge both anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the manuscript drafting, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table A1. Demographic status of the macaque population and composition of the two study groups (Michelin and Utara) in Ubud Monkey Forest in March 2020 (i.e., at the end of the study period); with number of studied intact and sterilized females.
Table A1. Demographic status of the macaque population and composition of the two study groups (Michelin and Utara) in Ubud Monkey Forest in March 2020 (i.e., at the end of the study period); with number of studied intact and sterilized females.
PopulationUbud
Number of social groups8
Population size1099
Home range size (ha)20.5
Density (ind/ha)54
Study groupsMichelinUtara
Group size13633
Adult males167
Adult females459
Subadult males123
Subadult females52
Juveniles438
Old infant83
Young infant71
Total females studied417
Sterilized females131
Intact females286

Appendix B

Table A2. Summary of the focal subjects, with for each of them: group, age class (adult female vs. subadult female), standardized hierarchical rank, fertility status (intact vs. sterilized), time (in months) elapsed (by the middle of the study) since sterilization surgery, and the nursing conditions (nursing a young infant (YI), nursing an old infant (OI), non-nursing females) experienced during the study period.
Table A2. Summary of the focal subjects, with for each of them: group, age class (adult female vs. subadult female), standardized hierarchical rank, fertility status (intact vs. sterilized), time (in months) elapsed (by the middle of the study) since sterilization surgery, and the nursing conditions (nursing a young infant (YI), nursing an old infant (OI), non-nursing females) experienced during the study period.
Nursing Condition
IDGroupAgeRankStatusTimeNursing YINursing OINon-Nursing
MonroeUtaraAF1.43Intact-NoNoYes
GumalUtaraAF2.86Intact-YesYesYes
H16 TracyUtaraAF4.29Sterilized4NoNoYes
LittlefingerUtaraAF5.71Intact-YesNoYes
CinderellaUtaraAF7.14Intact-YesYesYes
BigmamaUtaraAF8.57Intact-YesYesNo
AmyUtaraAF10Intact-YesNoYes
H4 NipplesMichelinAF0.24Sterilized10NoNoYes
SnickMichelinAF0.49Intact-YesNoYes
CleftMichelinAF0.73Intact-NoYesYes
AsymMichelinAF0.98Intact-NoNoYes
H11 BosomMichelinAF1.22Sterilized10NoNoYes
YoungMichelinAF1.46Intact-YesYesNo
PutihMichelinAF1.71Intact-YesYesNo
BatMichelinAF1.95Intact-YesNoYes
YouMichelinAF2.2Intact-YesYesNo
BlackTitsMichelinAF2.44Intact-YesNoYes
CrunchedMichelinAF2.68Intact-YesNoYes
SpottyMichelinAF2.93Intact-NoNoYes
TelingaMichelinAF3.17Intact-YesYesNo
H7 LaurenMichelinAF3.41Sterilized10NoNoYes
H8 WinkMichelinAF3.66Intact-YesYesNo
TrivialMichelinAF3.9Intact-YesYesNo
ExcroissanceMichelinAF4.15Intact-YesYesNo
H13 TorticoliMichelinAF4.39Sterilized4NoNoYes
SlashMichelinAF4.63Intact-YesNoYes
H18MichelinSF4.88Sterilized4NoNoYes
TipMichelinAF5.12Intact-NoNoYes
WhiteMichelinAF5.37Intact-YesYesYes
TugasMichelinAF5.61Intact-YesYesNo
TuftMichelinAF5.85Intact-YesYesYes
TridentMichelinAF6.1Intact-YesNoYes
H5 PincangMichelinAF6.34Sterilized17NoNoYes
H1MichelinAF6.59Sterilized29NoNoYes
H6 TerkulaiMichelinAF6.83Sterilized10NoNoYes
ArcadeMichelinAF7.07Intact-YesYesYes
H10 MimiMichelinAF7.32Sterilized10YesYesNo
H9 TumeurMichelinAF7.56Sterilized10NoNoYes
SnagMichelinAF7.8Intact-NoNoYes
H17MichelinSF8.05Sterilized4NoNoYes
H14 PinkMichelinAF8.29Sterilized4NoYesYes
HelixMichelinAF8.54Intact-YesNoYes
GutterMichelinAF8.78Intact-YesYesYes
CrackMichelinAF9.02Intact-YesNoYes
BangMichelinAF9.27Intact-YesYesNo
HoleMichelinAF9.51Intact-YesYesNo
DuaMichelinAF9.76Intact-YesYesNo
H15MichelinSF10Sterilized4NoNoYes

References

  1. Godde, S.; Côté, S.D.; Réale, D. Female mountain goats, Oreamnos americanus, associate according to kinship and reproductive status. Anim. Behav. 2015, 108, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Maestripieri, D. Influence of infants on female social relationships in monkeys. Folia Primatol. 1994, 63, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Seyfarth, R.M. A model of social grooming among adult female monkeys. J. Theor. Biol. 1977, 65, 671–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mann, J.; Smuts, B.B. Natal attraction: Allomaternal care and mother–infant separations in wild bottlenose dolphins. Anim. Behav. 1998, 55, 1097–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Parsons, C.E.; Young, K.S.; Kumari, N.; Stein, A.; Kringelbach, M.L. The motivational salience of infant faces is similar for men and women. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silk, J.B.; Rendall, D.; Cheney, D.L.; Seyfarth, R.M. Natal attraction in adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) in the Moremi reserve, Botswana. Ethology 2003, 109, 627–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dunayer, E.S.; Berman, C.M. Infant Handling Among Primates. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 2018, 31, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Riedman, M.L. The evolution of alloparental care and adoption in mammals and birds. Q. Rev. Biol. 1982, 57, 405–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Silk, J.B. Social Components of Fitness in Primate Groups. Science 2007, 317, 1347–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Armitage, K.B. Social Dynamics of Mammals: Reproductive Success, Kinship and Individual Fitness. Tree 1987, 2, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gumert, M.D. Grooming and infant handling interchange in Macaca fascicularis: The relationship between infant supply and grooming payment. Int. J. Primatol. 2007, 28, 1059–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Noë, R.; Hammerstein, P. Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1994, 35, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maestripieri, D. Social structure, infant handling, and mothering styles in group-living old world monkeys. Int. J. Primatol. 1994, 15, 531–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Thierry, B. Unity in diversity: Lessons from macaque societies. Evol. Anthropol. Issues News Rev. 2007, 16, 224–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hiraiwa, M. Maternal and alloparental care in a troop of free-ranging Japanese monkeys. Primates 1981, 22, 309–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Small, M.F. A comparison of mother and nonmother behaviors during birth season in two species of captive macaques. Folia Primatol. 1982, 38, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dunayer, E.S.; Berman, C.M. Infant handling enhances social bonds in free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behaviour 2017, 154, 875–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berman, C.M. The ontogeny of social relationships with group companions among free-ranging infant rhesus monkeys II. Differentiation and attractiveness. Anim. Behav. 1982, 30, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Lima, V.C.C.; Ferreira, R.G. Social network changes during the development of immature capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.). Primates 2021, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liao, Z.; Sosa, S.; Wu, C.; Zhang, P. The influence of age on wild rhesus macaques’ affiliative social interactions. Am. J. Primatol. 2018, 80, e22733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fedurek, P.; Lehmann, J. The effect of excluding juveniles on apparent adult olive baboons (Papio anubis) social networks. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sueur, C.; Jacobs, A.; Amblard, F.; Petit, O.; King, A.J. How can social network analysis improve the study of primate behavior? Am. J. Primatol. 2011, 73, 703–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sih, A.; Hanser, S.F.; McHugh, K.A. Social network theory: New insights and issues for behavioral ecologists. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2009, 63, 975–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Krause, J.; Croft, D.P.; James, R. Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: Potential applications. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2007, 62, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Farine, D.R. When to choose dynamic vs. static social network analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 2018, 87, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Farine, D.R.; Whitehead, H. Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 2015, 84, 1144–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Farine, D.R. Measuring phenotypic assortment in animal social networks: Weighted associations are more robust than binary edges. Anim. Behav. 2014, 89, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wasserman, S.; Faust, K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sosa, S.; Sueur, C.; Puga-Gonzalez, I. Network measures in animal social network analysis: Their strengths, limits, interpretations and uses. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2020, 12, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hanneman, R.A.; Riddle, M. Introduction to Social Network Methods; University of California: Riverside, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  31. Brakes, P. Sociality and Wild Animal Welfare: Future Directions. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Botreau, R.; Veissier, I.; Butterworth, A.; Bracke, M.B.M.; Keeling, L.J. Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2007, 16, 225–228. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kirkwood, J.K. Wild Animal Welfare. Anim. Welf. 2013, 22, 147–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wrangham, R.W. An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 1980, 75, 262–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ohl, F.; Putman, R.J. Animal Welfare at the Group Level: More Than the Sum of Individual Welfare? Acta Biotheor. 2014, 62, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Anderson, C.J.; Van De Kerk, M.; Pine, W.E.; Hostetler, M.E.; Heard, D.J.; Johnson, S.A. Population estimate and management options for introduced rhesus macaques. J. Wildl. Manag. 2019, 83, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reddy, A.R.M.; Chander, J. Human-monkey conflict in India: Some available solutions for conflict mitigation with special reference to Himachal Pradesh. Indian For. 2016, 142, 941–949. [Google Scholar]
  38. Buyukmihci, N.C. Castration for Population Control of Macaques in a Sanctuary Setting; University of California: Davis, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ramsey, D. Effects of fertility control on behavior and disease transmission in brushtail possums. J. Wildl. Manag. 2007, 71, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Biquand, S.; Boug, A.; Biquand-Guyot, V.; Gauthier, J.-P. Management of commensal baboons in Saudi Arabia. Rev. d’Ecologie Terre Vie 1994, 49, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  41. Cheng, W.W. A review of the management measures of feral macaques in Hong Kong. Master’s Thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  42. Martelli, P.; Krishnasamy, K.; Kwan, A.; Wong, A. Permanent contraception by laparoscopic tubectomy with ovarian conservation in Hong Kong macaques. Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 2020, 68, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deleuze, S.; Brotcorne, F.; Polet, R.; Soma, G.; Rigaux, G.; Giraud, G.; Cloutier, F.; Poncin, P.; Wandia, I.N.; Huynen, M.-C. Modified endoscopic tubectomy of pregnant and non-pregnant female Balinese macaques (Macaca fascicularis) with postoperative monitoring. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kalbitzer, U.; Chapman, C.A. Primate responses to changing environments in the Anthropocene. In Primate Life Histories, Sex Roles, and Adaptability. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects; Kalbitzer, U., Jack, K., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 283–310. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu, P.-H.; Weng, C.-C.; Kuo, H.-C.; Chi, C.-H. Evaluation of endoscopic salpingectomy for sterilization of female Formosan macaques (Macaca cyclopis). Am. J. Primatol. 2015, 77, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Phoenix, C.H. Sexual behavior in rhesus monkeys after vasectomy. Science 1973, 179, 493–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, J.R.; Wing, R.; Hulka, J.F. Ovarian function in monkeys after bilateral salpingectomy. Int. J. Fertil. 1984, 29, 118–121. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dede, F.S.; Dilbaz, B.; Akyuz, O.; Caliskan, E.; Kurtaran, V.; Dilbaz, S. Changes in menstrual pattern and ovarian function following bipolar electrocauterization of the fallopian tubes for voluntary surgical contraception. Contraception 2006, 73, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ross, C. Life history patterns and ecology of macaque species. Primates 1992, 33, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Whitten, T.; Soeriaatmadja, R.E.; Afiff, S.A. The Ecology of Java and Bali (Vol. 2); Oxford University Press: Singapore, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fuentes, A. Naturalcultural encounters in Bali: Monkeys, temples, tourists, and ethnoprimatology. Cult. Anthropol. 2010, 25, 600–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brotcorne, F.; Fuentes, A.; Wandia, I.N.; Beudels-Jamar, R.C.; Huynen, M.-C. Changes in activity patterns and intergroup relationships after a significant mortality event in commensal long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in Bali, Indonesia. Int. J. Primatol. 2015, 36, 548–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caro, T.M.; Roper, R.; Young, M.; Dank, G.R. Inter-observer reliability. Behaviour 1979, 69, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Brotcorne, F. Behavioral Ecology and Commensal Long-Tailed Macaque (Macaca fascicularis) Populations in Bali, Indonesia: Impact of Anthropic Factors. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  55. Jewett, D.A.; Dukelow, W.R. Cyclicity and gestation length of Macaca fascicularis. Primates 1972, 13, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Van Noordwijk, M.A. From Maternal Investment to Lifetime Maternal Care. In The Evolution of Primate Societies; Mitani, J.C., Call, J., Kappeler, P.M., Palombit, R.A., Silk, J.B., Eds.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2012; pp. 321–342. [Google Scholar]
  57. Poirier, F.E.; Smith, E.O. The crab-eating macaques (Macaca fascicularis) of Angaur Island, Palau, Micronesia. Folia Primatol. 1974, 22, 258–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Altmann, J. Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 1974, 49, 227–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Newton-Fisher, N.E. Animal Behaviour Pro: 1.4.5. Apple iTunes Download. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sosa, S. The influence of gender, age, matriline and hierarchical rank on individual social position, role and interactional patterns in Macaca sylvanus at ‘La Forêt des Singes’: A multilevel social network approach. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mishra, P.S.; Pal, A.; Velankar, A.D.; Kumara, H.N.; Singh, M.; Cooper, M. Does rank rule? Rank-related grooming patterns in Nicobar long-tailed macaques Macaca fascicularis umbrosus. Primates 2020, 61, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Veenema, H.; Spruijt, B.; Gispen, W.; van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. Aging, dominance history, and social behavior in Java-monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Neurobiol. Aging 1997, 18, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. David, H.A. Ranking from unbalanced paired-comparison data. Biometrika 1987, 74, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. de Vries, H. Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: A new procedure and review. Anim. Behav. 1998, 55, 827–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. de Vries, H.; Stevens, J.M.G.; Vervaecke, H. Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies. Anim. Behav. 2006, 71, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Silk, M.J.; Jackson, A.L.; Croft, D.P.; Colhoun, K.; Bearhop, S. The consequences of unidentifiable individuals for the analysis of an animal social network. Anim. Behav. 2015, 104, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Newman, M.E.J. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys. Rev. E 2003, 67, 026126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Barthélemy, M.; Barrat, A.; Pastor-Satorras, R.; Vespignani, A. Characterization and modeling of weighted networks. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2005, 346, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Qi, X.; Duval, R.D.; Christensen, K.; Fuller, E.; Spahiu, A.; Wu, Q.; Wu, Y.; Tang, W.; Zhang, C. Terrorist networks, network energy and node removal: A new measure of centrality based on Laplacian energy. Soc. Netw. 2013, 2, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Sosa, S.; Puga-Gonzalez, I.; Hu, F.; Pansanel, J.; Xie, X.; Sueur, C. A multilevel statistical toolkit to study animal social networks: The Animal Network Toolkit Software (ANTs) R package. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Borgatti, S.; Everett, M.; Freeman, L. UCINET 6 For Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis; Analytic Technologies: Harvard, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  72. R Development Core Team. R: A language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2013. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 29 August 2021).
  73. Krause, J.; Lusseau, D.; James, R. Animal social networks: An introduction. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2009, 63, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Whitehead, H. Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  75. Croft, D.P.; Madden, J.R.; Franks, D.W.; James, R. Hypothesis testing in animal social networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Puga-Gonzalez, I.; Sueur, C.; Sosa, S. Null models for animal social network analysis and data collected via focal sampling: Pre-network or node network permutation? Methods Ecol. Evol. 2021, 12, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lenth, R.; Lenth, M.R. Package R ‘lsmeans’. Am. Stat. 2018, 34, 216–221. [Google Scholar]
  78. Overduin-de Vries, A.M.; Olesen, C.U.; de Vries, H.; Spruijt, B.M.; Sterck, E.H.M. Sneak copulations in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis): No evidence for tactical deception. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2013, 67, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. van Noordwijk, M.A.; van Schaik, C.P. Competition among female long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Anim. Behav. 1987, 35, 577–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Asquith, P.J. Provisioning and the study of free-ranging primates: History, effects, and prospects. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1989, 32, 129–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. McFarland, R.; Murphy, D.; Lusseau, D.; Henzi, S.P.; Parker, J.L.; Pollet, T.V.; Barrett, L. The ‘strength of weak ties’ among female baboons: Fitness-related benefits of social bonds. Anim. Behav. 2017, 126, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Silk, J.B.; Beehner, J.C.; Bergman, T.J.; Crockford, C.; Engh, A.L.; Moscovice, L.R.; Wittig, R.M.; Seyfarth, R.M.; Cheney, D.L. The benefits of social capital: Close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 3099–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Berman, C.M.; Rasmussen, K.L.R.; Suomi, S.J. Group size, infant development and social networks in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Anim. Behav. 1997, 53, 405–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Brent, L.J.N.; MacLarnon, A.; Platt, M.L.; Semple, S. Seasonal changes in the structure of rhesus macaque social networks. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2013, 67, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Chapais, B.; Berman, C.M. Kinship and Behavior in Primates; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  86. Maestripieri, D. Intraspecific variability in parenting styles of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The role of the social environment. Ethology 2001, 107, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Giraud, G. Relation between social tension and demographic density of commensal long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in Bali (Indonesia). Master’s Thesis, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  88. Brotcorne, F.; Wandia, I.N.; Rompis, A.L.; Soma, I.G.; Suartha, I.N.; Huynen, M.C. Box 6.1 Recent demographic and behavioral data of Macaca fascicularis at Padangtegal, Bali, Indonesia. In Monkeys on the Edge Ecology and Management of Long-Tailed Macaques and Their Interface with Humans; Gumert, M.D., Fuentes, A., Jones-Engel, L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; p. 180. [Google Scholar]
  89. Chism, J. Allocare patterns among Cercopithecines. Folia Primatol. 2000, 71, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Quenette, P.-Y. Functions of vigilance behaviour in mammals: A review. Acta Oecologica 1990, 11, 801–818. [Google Scholar]
  91. Le Bohec, C.; Gauthier-Clerc, M.; Le Maho, Y. The adaptive significance of crèches in the king penguin. Anim. Behav. 2005, 70, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Giraud, G.; Tibesar, F.; Huynen, M.-C.; Broens, D.; Delooz, S.; Cloutier, F.; Wandia, I.N.; Poncin, P.; Brotcorne, F. Preliminary results on behavioural variation following tubectomy sterilisations in free-ranging female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in Bali, Indonesia. In 8th European Federation for Primatology Meeting. Folia Primatol. 2020, 91, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Huchard, E.; Cowlishaw, G. Female–female aggression around mating: An extra cost of sociality in a multimale primate society. Behav. Ecol. 2011, 22, 1003–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Baniel, A.; Cowlishaw, G.; Huchard, E. Context dependence of female reproductive competition in wild chacma baboons. Anim. Behav. 2018, 139, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ehardt, C.L. Birth-season interactions of adult female Japanese Macaques (Macaca fuscata) without newborn infants. Int. J. Primatol. 1987, 8, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Engelhardt, A.; Hodges, J.K.; Heistermann, M. Post-conception mating in wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis): Characterization, endocrine correlates and functional significance. Horm. Behav. 2007, 51, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Snijders, L.; Blumstein, D.T.; Stanley, C.R.; Franks, D.W. Animal Social Network Theory Can Help Wildlife Conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2017, 32, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. McCowan, B.; Anderson, K.; Heagarty, A.; Cameron, A. Utility of social network analysis for primate behavioral management and well-being. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 109, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Beisner, B.A.; McCowan, B. Social networks and animal welfare. In Animal Social Networks; Krause, J., James, R., Franks, D., Croft, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 111–122. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparison of the (a,b) frequency in association (Strength), (c,d) number of female neighbors (Degree) and (e,f) connectivity power (Laplacian centrality) between female nursing conditions (No infant (NN) vs. Young infant (YI) vs. Old infant (OI) females) of the contact- (a,c,e) and 5 m proximity networks (b,d,f). Node size reflects the hierarchical rank (the lowest values represent the highest-ranking individuals). The lines represent the same individual experiencing different nursing conditions in the course of the study. Because several individual data points could overlap, more than two lines could start from the same dot.
Figure 1. Comparison of the (a,b) frequency in association (Strength), (c,d) number of female neighbors (Degree) and (e,f) connectivity power (Laplacian centrality) between female nursing conditions (No infant (NN) vs. Young infant (YI) vs. Old infant (OI) females) of the contact- (a,c,e) and 5 m proximity networks (b,d,f). Node size reflects the hierarchical rank (the lowest values represent the highest-ranking individuals). The lines represent the same individual experiencing different nursing conditions in the course of the study. Because several individual data points could overlap, more than two lines could start from the same dot.
Animals 11 02538 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of the number of female partners (a) receiving (out-degree) or (b) giving (in-degree) grooming interactions across nursing condition (NN vs. YI vs. OI females). The lines represent the same individual experiencing different nursing conditions during the course of the study. Because several individual data points could overlap, more than two lines could start from the same dot.
Figure 2. Comparison of the number of female partners (a) receiving (out-degree) or (b) giving (in-degree) grooming interactions across nursing condition (NN vs. YI vs. OI females). The lines represent the same individual experiencing different nursing conditions during the course of the study. Because several individual data points could overlap, more than two lines could start from the same dot.
Animals 11 02538 g002
Figure 3. Grooming network of adult females in Michelin (left) and Utara (right) group at the Ubud Monkey Forest (early 2020). Color of nodes refers to the fertility status (red for sterilized females, blue for intact females). The arrows show the direction of the interactions and the tie size is scaled based on the strength of the relationship.
Figure 3. Grooming network of adult females in Michelin (left) and Utara (right) group at the Ubud Monkey Forest (early 2020). Color of nodes refers to the fertility status (red for sterilized females, blue for intact females). The arrows show the direction of the interactions and the tie size is scaled based on the strength of the relationship.
Animals 11 02538 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of the average (median) (a) Degree (number of female neighbors), (b) Laplacian centrality (connectivity power), and (c) Strength (frequencies of association) between sterilized and intact females for the 5 m proximity network (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 4. Comparison of the average (median) (a) Degree (number of female neighbors), (b) Laplacian centrality (connectivity power), and (c) Strength (frequencies of association) between sterilized and intact females for the 5 m proximity network (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Animals 11 02538 g004
Table 1. Proximity network. Generalized linear mixed models (mixed binomial (degree) or gaussian (strength and Laplacian centrality) regressions) of SNA proximity (contact or ≤5 m) metrics, testing the main fixed effects of nursing condition (YI vs. OI vs. NN females), and the controlled predictors (i.e., fertility status (intact vs. sterilized females), group size and hierarchical rank): coefficient estimates, standard errors, z-test (for degree), or t-test (for strength and Laplacian centrality) and p-values, and likelihood ratio tests (LRT). The reference category for the nursing condition is the first condition stated. a “Intact females” as a reference category for the fertility status. The lowest values of the hierarchical rank represent the highest-ranked individuals.
Table 1. Proximity network. Generalized linear mixed models (mixed binomial (degree) or gaussian (strength and Laplacian centrality) regressions) of SNA proximity (contact or ≤5 m) metrics, testing the main fixed effects of nursing condition (YI vs. OI vs. NN females), and the controlled predictors (i.e., fertility status (intact vs. sterilized females), group size and hierarchical rank): coefficient estimates, standard errors, z-test (for degree), or t-test (for strength and Laplacian centrality) and p-values, and likelihood ratio tests (LRT). The reference category for the nursing condition is the first condition stated. a “Intact females” as a reference category for the fertility status. The lowest values of the hierarchical rank represent the highest-ranked individuals.
Response VariableProximityFixed EffectsEstimate ± SEz/t Valuesp-Values
DegreeContactIntercept−0.41 ± 0.33−1.230.11
Nursing condition
YI-NN0.06 ± 0.150.420.73
YI-OI0.39 ± 0.142.75<0.05
OI-NN−0.33 ± 0.15−2.190.11
Status a0.08 ± 0.170.470.69
Rank−0.07 ± 0.02−3.04<0.01
Group size−0.03 ± 0.01−4.240.11
LRT: deviance = 396.74, Df = 5, p < 0.0001
≤5 mIntercept1.62 ± 0.374.39<0.05
Nursing condition
YI-NN−0.07 ± 0.13−0.530.76
YI-OI0.28 ± 0.122.420.23
OI-NN−0.35 ± 0.14−2.510.16
Status a0.45 ± 0.182.52<0.05
Rank−0.09 ± 0.03−3.50<0.01
Group size−0.06 ± 0.01−6.94<0.05
LRT: deviance = 518.75, Df = 5, p < 0.0001
StrengthContactIntercept0.35 ± 0.094.01<0.001
Nursing condition
YI-NN−0.20 ± 0.06−3.66<0.001
YI-OI−0.15 ± 0.06−2.59<0.05
OI-NN0.06 ± 0.06−0.910.07
Status a−0.03 ± 0.06−0.490.72
Rank−0.02 ± 0.01−3.10<0.01
Group size0.006 ± 0.0023.180.32
LRT: deviance = −37.24, Df = 5, p < 0.0001
≤5 mIntercept1.15 ± 0.0912.42<0.001
Nursing condition
YI-NN−0.37 ± 0.06−6.32<0.001
YI-OI−0.28 ± 0.06−4.53<0.001
OI-NN−0.09 ± NANA0.25
Status a0.05 ± 0.070.710.58
Rank−0.02 ± 0.01−3.03<0.05
Group size−0.003 ± 0.002−1.590.16
LRT: deviance = −28.22, Df = 5, p < 0.0001
Laplacian centralityContactIntercept0.64 ± 0.088.530.15
Nursing condition
YI-NN−0.051 ± 0.047−1.090.28
YI-OI−0.01 ± 0.05−0.140.90
OI-NN−0.04 ± 0.05−0.910.37
Status a0.052 ± 0.0540.980.29
Rank−0.009 ± 0.007−1.270.21
Group size−0.006 ± 0.002−3.750.19
LRT: deviance = −62.93, Df = 5, p < 0.05
≤5 mIntercept0.43 ± 0.058.860.27
Nursing condition
YI-NN−0.06 ± 0.03−2.060.053
YI-OI−0.05 ± 0.03−1.790.09
OI-NN−0.01 ± 0.03−0.170.87
Status a0.10 ± 0.032.82<0.01
Rank−0.0004 ± 0.004−0.100.93
Group size−0.006 ± 0.001−6.070.07
LRT: deviance = −141.96, Df = 5, p < 0.0001
Table 2. Grooming network. Generalized linear mixed models (mixed binomial (in-/out-degree) or gaussian (in-/out-strength and Laplacian centrality) regressions) of SNA grooming metrics, testing the main fixed effects of nursing condition (YI vs. OI vs. NN females), and the controlled predictors (i.e., fertility status (intact vs. sterilized females), group size and hierarchical rank): coefficient estimates, standard errors, z-test (for in-/out-degree) or t-test (for in-/out-strength and Laplacian centrality) and p-values, and likelihood ratio tests (LRT). The reference category for the nursing condition is the first condition stated. a “Intact females” as a reference category for the fertility status. The lowest values of the hierarchical rank represent the highest-ranked individuals.
Table 2. Grooming network. Generalized linear mixed models (mixed binomial (in-/out-degree) or gaussian (in-/out-strength and Laplacian centrality) regressions) of SNA grooming metrics, testing the main fixed effects of nursing condition (YI vs. OI vs. NN females), and the controlled predictors (i.e., fertility status (intact vs. sterilized females), group size and hierarchical rank): coefficient estimates, standard errors, z-test (for in-/out-degree) or t-test (for in-/out-strength and Laplacian centrality) and p-values, and likelihood ratio tests (LRT). The reference category for the nursing condition is the first condition stated. a “Intact females” as a reference category for the fertility status. The lowest values of the hierarchical rank represent the highest-ranked individuals.
Response VariableFixed EffectsEstimate ± SEz/t Valuesp Values
In-degreeIntercept−1.00 ± 0.40−2.510.81
Nursing condition
YI-NN0.39 ± 0.202.000.19
YI-OI0.89 ± 0.194.69<0.01
OI-NN−0.49 ± 0.19−2.570.13
Status a0.05 ± 0.220.250.87
Rank−0.07 ± 0.03−2.400.10
Group size−0.04 ± 0.01−4.520.43
LRT: deviance = 377.22, Df = 5, p < 0.0001
Out-degreeIntercept−1.47 ± 0.43−3.420.21
Nursing condition
YI-NN0.92 ± 0.214.40<0.01
YI-OI1.02 ± 0.214.92<0.001
OI-NN−0.10 ± 0.19−0.500.79
Status a0.23 ± 0.221.040.52
Rank−0.05 ± 0.03−1.420.33
Group size−0.04 ± 0.01−4.230.36
LRT: deviance = 349.58, Df = 5, p < 0.0001
In-strengthIntercept0.012 ± 0.0130.930.36
Nursing condition
YI-NN0.004 ± 0.010.390.71
YI-OI0.02 ± 0.011.910.07
OI-NN−0.02 ± 0.01−1.490.14
Status a−0.013 ± 0.011−1.150.26
Group size0.0005 ± 0.00031.840.51
LRT: deviance = −325.93, Df = 4, p = 0.06
Out-strengthIntercept0.03 ± 0.021.560.98
Nursing condition
YI-NN0.015 ± 0.0101.480.16
YI-OI0.0101 ± 0.01021.000.34
OI-NN0.004 ± 0.010.400.70
Status a−0.008 ± 0.01−0.660.50
Rank−0.001 ± 0.002−0.820.40
Group size0.00032 ± 0.000350.940.92
LRT: deviance = −325.66, Df = 5, p = 0.49
Laplacian centralityIntercept0.56 ± 0.153.820.20
Nursing condition
YI-NN0.19 ± 0.082.27<0.05
YI-OI0.10 ± 0.091.110.29
OI-NN0.091 ± 0.0930.980.34
Status a−0.04 ± 0.10−0.390.70
Rank0.002 ± 0.010.170.88
Group size−0.002 ± 0.003−0.600.56
LRT: deviance = 29.76, Df = 5, p = 0.29
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giraud, G.; Sosa, S.; Hambuckers, A.; Deleuze, S.; Wandia, I.N.; Huynen, M.-C.; Poncin, P.; Brotcorne, F. Effect of Infant Presence on Social Networks of Sterilized and Intact Wild Female Balinese Macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Animals 2021, 11, 2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092538

AMA Style

Giraud G, Sosa S, Hambuckers A, Deleuze S, Wandia IN, Huynen M-C, Poncin P, Brotcorne F. Effect of Infant Presence on Social Networks of Sterilized and Intact Wild Female Balinese Macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Animals. 2021; 11(9):2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giraud, Gwennan, Sebastian Sosa, Alain Hambuckers, Stefan Deleuze, I Nengah Wandia, Marie-Claude Huynen, Pascal Poncin, and Fany Brotcorne. 2021. "Effect of Infant Presence on Social Networks of Sterilized and Intact Wild Female Balinese Macaques (Macaca fascicularis)" Animals 11, no. 9: 2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092538

APA Style

Giraud, G., Sosa, S., Hambuckers, A., Deleuze, S., Wandia, I. N., Huynen, M. -C., Poncin, P., & Brotcorne, F. (2021). Effect of Infant Presence on Social Networks of Sterilized and Intact Wild Female Balinese Macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Animals, 11(9), 2538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop