Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Inclusion of Cold-Pressed Rapeseed Cake in the Concentrate for Dairy Cows upon Ruminal Biohydrogenation Process, Ruminal Microbial Community and Milk Production and Acceptability
Next Article in Special Issue
Shift in Circulating Serum Protein Fraction (SPF) Levels of Pregnant Jennies and Nutritional Related Aspects at Early-, Mid- and Late Gestation
Previous Article in Journal
Chromosome Diversity and Evolution in Helicoide a (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora): A Synthesis from Original and Literature Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigations on the Effects of Different Calcium Supply Exceeding the Requirements on Mineral Serum Concentrations and Bone Metabolism in Young Warmblood Stallions
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Feeding and Management of Horses with and without Free Faecal Liquid: A Case–Control Study

Animals 2021, 11(9), 2552; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092552
by Katrin M. Lindroth 1,*, Jan-Erik Lindberg 1, Astrid Johansen 2 and Cecilia E. Müller 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Animals 2021, 11(9), 2552; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092552
Submission received: 22 June 2021 / Revised: 17 August 2021 / Accepted: 23 August 2021 / Published: 30 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Equine Nutrition)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

General comment: The manuscript “Feeding and management of horses with and without free faecal liquid- a case-control study” is interesting but not really original. The study is mainly an observational one, and the contents addressed in this study could be worthy of investigation mainly from the practical point of view.  The planning adopted to fulfill the investigation presents some limitations that are correctly and clearly presented by the Authors, although the study was well organized and made as presented by the exhaustive description. The findings presented are enough clear. The results proposed by the authors are extensively described and substantial, confirming similar results yet obtained. The single points are well discussed and compared to a limited not really up-to-date literature on the argument.

 

 

Title: appropriate

 

Abstract: suitable

 

Introduction: This section is concise, and includes the specific literature references. An hypothesis could be added to better explain the methodology adopted to fulfill the aim of the research.

 

Material and methods: The study was well organized and made as presented by the exhaustive description. The methodologies adopted are the current ones. Nevertheless, the planning adopted to fulfill the investigation presents some limitations that are correctly and clearly presented by the Authors.

 

Results: The results obtained by the authors are extensively described and substantially commented in the light of the aim of the survey adopted.  

 

Discussion: The comments reported in discussion, although concise, are pertinent to the results achieved, but they do not give any final achievement.

 

References: are appropriate, although limited and not completely up-to-date.

 

Figures and Tables: are explicative.

 

Decision: Although the current manuscript presents a limited originality, it is acceptable for publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is an interesting paper and you have compiled a significant amount of information.  I would have liked to have had access to the table with the horse data which needs to be included.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop