Next Article in Journal
Promoting Judicious Antimicrobial Use in Beef Production: The Role of Quarantine
Previous Article in Journal
Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Cervical Microbes of Gilts and Sows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Oregano Oil and Cobalt Lactate on Sheep In Vitro Digestibility, Fermentation Characteristics and Rumen Microbial Community

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3
College of Grassland Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
4
Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(1), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010118
Submission received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 22 December 2021 / Accepted: 1 January 2022 / Published: 4 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Nutrition)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In the context of a shortage of feed resources and a complete ban on veterinary antibiotics, searching for green additives that can improve the production performance of ruminants has become a popular research topic. Oregano essential oil (EO) inhibits rumen gas production (GP) and regulates animal digestive metabolism, and cobalt lactate (Co) can improve feed digestibility. However, previous studies on EO of oregano and Co showed different results. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of different EOC addition levels on rumen in vitro fermentation and rumen bacterial community composition, and the experimental data obtained showed that all five EOC (0.1425% cobalt lactate + 1.13% oregano essential oil + 98.7275% carrier) addition levels in this experiment had no significant effect on nutrient digestibility. However, the addition of 1500 mg·L−1 EOC significantly improved rumen fermentation parameters and altered the microbiota composition. All presented data provide a theoretical basis for the application of oregano essential oil and cobalt in ruminant nutrition.

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of different EOC (0.1425% cobalt lactate + 1.13% oregano essential oil + 98.7275% carrier) levels on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial changes. Six EOC levels (treatments: 0 mg·L−1, CON; 50 mg·L−1, EOC1; 100 mg·L−1, EOC2; 400 mg·L−1, EOC3; 800 mg·L−1, EOC4 and 1500 mg·L−1, EOC5) were selected to be used to in vitro incubation. The in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility (IVNDFD), in vitro acid detergent fiber digestibility (IVNDFD), pH, ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration, total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentration and microbial protein (MCP) concentration were measured after 48 h incubation, after which the groups with significant nutrient digestibility and fermentation parameters were subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing. The results showed that the total gas production (GP) of the EOC5 group was higher than that of the other groups after 12 h of in vitro incubation. TVFA, NH3-N and MCP concentrations were also shown to be higher in group EOC5 than those in other groups (p < 0.05), while NH3-N and MCP concentrations in the EOC2 group were lower than those in other groups significantly (p < 0.05). The molar ratio of acetic acid decreased while the molar ratio of propionic acid increased after the addition of EOC. 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that the rumen microbiota was altered in response to adding EOC, especially for the EOC5 treatment, with firmicutes shown to be the most abundant (43.1%). The relative abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group was significantly lower, while the relative abundance of uncultured_bacterium_f_Muribaculaceae and Succiniclasticum was significantly higher in the EOC5 group than those in other groups (p < 0.05). Comprehensive analysis showed that EOC (1500 mg·L−1) could significantly increase gas production, alter sheep rumen fermentation parameters and microbiota composition.

1. Introduction

The exploitation and utilization of straw feed has always been an important subject in animal nutrition, as massive burning leads to serious waste of crop straw, although it is difficult to apply to monogastric animals [1]. However, the microbial community of ruminants ensures that they can produce high-quality proteins from low-quality plant feed and can catalyze the hydrolysis of indigestible plant crude fibers through microbial extracellular enzymes [2]. Although the rumen microbial community is very stable throughout the life cycle of animals, the diversity of the microbial community is largely influenced by diet (e.g., different feed types and additives) [3]. Some studies have concluded that supplementing feed with additives such as probiotics has a positive effect on the gastrointestinal microbiota of cattle [4]. Therefore, the rational use of feed additives to improve the gastrointestinal flora of ruminants is highly important for improving the utilization of feed resources.
The use of antibiotics in animal feed has been almost banned in the European Union since 2006 [5]. Similarly, China’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs issued Announcement No. 194 in 2020, which completely banned the addition of antibiotics to feed. Therefore, the identification of green additives for ruminant productivity has become a popular research topic. Oregano essential oil (EO) is an aromatic volatile oil extracted from oregano and has strong antibacterial and antioxidant properties [6] that help maintain a healthy microbiota by regulating the proliferation of beneficial microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract and suppressing increases in the number of harmful microorganisms [7]. Previous studies have reported that EO inhibits rumen gas production (GP) [8], and more recent studies have found that EO regulates animal digestive metabolism by improving protein metabolism and volatile fatty acid (VFA) patterns [9]. Claudia found that EOs improve rumen fermentation and feed digestion efficiency by affecting bacteria of the families Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae [10]. Vitamin B12 acts as an activator of a variety of enzymes, and its synthesis requires the participation of cobalt (Co) [11], and Co has been shown to improve feed digestibility in both in vitro and in vivo studies [12,13].
Previous studies have shown that calf growth is improved when oregano EO and Co combined (EOC) are added to milk given to calves [14]. Moreover, dietary EOC supplementation significantly increased average daily weight gain in goats while significantly improving carcass weight and meat quality, and EOC was found to stimulate changes in the animals’ immune system at the physiological and cellular levels [15]. These experiments showed that providing a mixture of Co and EO improved rumen fermentation capacity and altered VFA patterns, resulting in improved digestibility of dry matter, protein and fiber. However, previous studies on oregano EO and Co have yielded inconsistent results on the basis of the amount and type of EO additive, and few studies have reported relationships between rumen microbes and rumen fermentation parameters and feed digestibility [16]. This study hypothesized that different levels of EOC addition would have different effects on rumen microorganisms, while nutrient digestibility and fermentation parameters might change with the microbiota altered. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment is to evaluate the effects of different EOC addition levels on in vitro fermentation, nutrient digestibility and rumen bacterial community composition by comprehensive analysis of rumen microbes, nutrient digestibility and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters, and determine the optimal addition level.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Feeding and Management

All experiments involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Animal Committee of Gansu Agricultural University (GSAU-2th-AST-2021-126).
Five healthy small-tailed han sheep (approximately 10 months of age) with permanent rumen fistulae were used as test animals; they had a mean rectal temperature of 39 °C and a mean body weight of 50 kg. The sheep were fed twice daily (9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.) in a single barn and had free access to water. The composition of the ration is shown in Table 1. According to the agricultural industry standard for sheep feeding (NY/T816-2004), a basic diet with a daily feed intake of 3.06 kg·d−1 was prepared (Table 1).

2.2. Oregano Essential Oil Organic Cobalt Treatment

EOC (0.1425% cobalt lactate + 1.13% oregano essential oil + 98.7275% carrier) was purchased from Ralco Animal Nutrition (Marshall, MN, USA). The carrier was composed of 75% zeolite (mordenite) + 15% limestone + 10% diatomite. Previous studies by our group have demonstrated that this carrier has no effect on sheep [17]. Six EOC inclusion levels were evaluated: 0 mg·L−1 (CON), 50 mg·L−1 (EOC1), 100 mg·L−1 (EOC2), 400 mg·L−1 (EOC3), 800 mg·L−1 (EOC4) and 1500 mg·L−1 (EOC5). These levels were adjusted to compensate for the amount of EOC in the dry granular product added to the in vitro fermentation medium.

2.3. In Vitro Fermentation

Rumen contents were obtained from 5 sheep at the same ratio before morning feeding. After mixing, the mixture was filtered through a preheated thermoflask with 4 layers of gauze, CO2 was continuously injected, and the flask was set aside. The same feed as that provided to the test sheep (0.2000 ± 0.0010 g, dry matter basis) was accurately weighed into a nylon bag with a pore size of 50 μm, a length of 2.0 cm and a width of 3.0 cm. It was placed at the bottom of the extracorporeal tracheal tube, 30 mL microbial culture solution (10 mL rumen juice + 20 mL buffer) was added and it was always filled with CO2 gas; the buffer was prepared according to Menke [18]). After the gas was discharged from the gas-producing tube, the rubber sleeve at the front of the gas-producing tube was immediately sealed, and the scale value (mL) of the gas-producing tube was recorded. The GP volume readings (mL) were recorded at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h on a thermostatic water bath stand at 39 °C, and each reading was followed by a slight vibration to simulate rumen movement. The test tube was a 100 mL glass syringe (Germany). There were 6 replicates per treatment with 6 blank vials (rumen fluid only) without feed substrate to correct for background GP.

2.4. Sampling

After 48 h of incubation, the nylon bags were removed and put in ice water to stop fermentation. The pH of the culture broth was measured immediately, and the nylon bags were washed with distilled water until they became colorless. The culture solution was put into 5 mL centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 3000 r·min−1 for 10 min. The supernatant was separated and stored at −20 °C, the concentrations of VFA, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and NH3-N were determined; the remaining part was stored at −80 °C for analysis of microbial protein (MCP) and bacterial community composition.

2.5. DNA Extraction and High-Throughput Sequencing

Rumen microbiome DNA was extracted using a bacterial DNA extraction kit (Omega, Shanghai, China), fresh samples of 250–500 mg were transferred into 2.0 mL centrifuge tubes (grinding beads were added), SL2 was added at 700 uL (SL2 is preferred for a first extraction; if poor, SL1 is used for reextraction), 150 uL of Enhancer SX was added, the tube was capped tightly and vortexed to mix thoroughly. Then the sample was lysed, precipitated to remove impurities, filtered to remove inhibitors and finally the DNA was eluted. Finally, the concentration and purity were checked using an ultramicrospectrophotometer (Thermo NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Fisher, Shanghai, China). The extracted DNA samples were stored at −80 °C. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using universal primers 338 F (5’-ACTCCTAC GGGAGGCAGCAG-3’) and 806 R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’) to characterize the rumen microbiota, and PCR amplification was performed as follows: pre-denaturation for 3 min (95 °C); denaturation for 30 s (95 °C), annealing for 30 s (55 °C), extension for 30 s (72 °C), 40 cycles; final extension for 7 min (72 °C). All the amplification products were analyzed by library sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) platform.

2.6. Bioinformatic Analysis

Based on the raw data returned from the Illumina HiSeq sequencing platform, optimized sequences (tags) were obtained by double-end splicing (FLASH v 1.2.7), filtering (Trimmomatic v 0.33), and chimera removal (UCHIME v 4.2). Tags were clustered at a 97% similarity level, operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained using USEARCH software and the OTUs were taxonomically annotated based on the Silva (bacteria) taxonomic database. Based on the results of the OTU analysis, the data were analyzed to generate community structure maps, species clustering heat maps, phylogenetic trees and taxonomic dendrograms of each sample at the phylum, class, order, family, genus and species levels. The QIIME2 software was used to calculate the ACE, Chao1, Shannon and Simpson alpha diversity indices to analyze the species diversity within individual samples. Sample dilution curves and rank abundance curves were plotted. Beta diversity analysis was used to assess the magnitude of differences between samples in terms of species diversity (colony composition and structure). Sample hierarchical clustering (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA)), nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis, sample clustering using heat maps, sample principal component analysis (PCA) and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) (with grouping information) were performed at the corresponding distances according to the distance matrix. To identify biomarkers with significant differences between groups through linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe), the species abundance data were compared between groups using t-tests in Metastats software, after which the data were screened for species that caused differences in sample composition between the two groups.

2.7. Chemical Analysis

The in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) was determined by drying at 65 °C for 48 h (AOAC, 2016; 930.15), in vitro neutral detergent fiber (AOAC, 2016; 973.18) and in vitro acid detergent fiber (AOAC, 2016; 2002.04) using the AOAC international procedures [19]. A pHS-3C acidometer was used to measure the pH, and the NH3-N concentration was determined by the phenol-sodium hypochlorite colorimetric method according to Wang et al. [20]. VFAs were determined by gas chromatography (GC-2010 Plus; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) according to the method of Zhou et al. [21]. Using internal standards, internally labeled 2-ethylbutyric acid (2 EB) was used. A 30 m × 0.32 mm× 0.25 μm size capillary column (AT-FFAP) was used. The Gas chromatograph column temperature was programmed for 1-minute hold (60 °C), 5 °C·min−1 to 115 °C (not held), 15 °C·min−1 to 180 °C. Detector temperature was set to 260 °C and injection port temperature to 250 °C. MCP concentrations were measured using a kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Biological Engineering) with a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
GP was measured according to the following formula:
G P t = 200 × V t V o / W
where, t is a certain time point recorded during fermentation (h); GPt is the output tracheal reading of each combination at time t (mL); V0 is the 0 h reading of each producing pipe (mL); Vt is the reading of producing trachea after t h of in vitro culture (mL) and W is the dry matter weight (mg) of each combination sample in the production pipe. GP (mL) at a specific point in time = GP of the sample during this period—Initial reading of the producing pipe—GP of the blank tube during the period.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

We used a one-way experimental design. Before any statistical analyses were conducted, we used SPSS (SPSS v 26.0, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)’s Kolmogorov–Smirnov test program to check the normality and outliers of all data. Levene’s test was used to test the homogeneity of variance, and the experimental data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (Analysis of variance) of SPSS (SPSS v 26.0, SPSS, Inc.) software. Duncan’s method was used for multiple comparisons when the difference was significant, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and 0.05 < p < 0.10 was considered a trend towards significant difference. The correlations between nutrient digestibility, in vitro fermentation parameters and rumen microbes (relative abundance > 0.5%) were analyzed by Spearman correlation tests.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of In Vitro Fermentation Total Gas Production by EOC

Within 12 h, the GP in the CON group was higher than that in the other groups, and after 12 h, the GP in the EOC5 group was higher than that in the other groups (Figure 1).

3.2. Changes in Feed Digestibility and Fermentation Parameters

As shown in Table 2, for GP24 h the EOC5 group was significantly higher than that in the CON group (p < 0.05), and that in the CON group was significantly higher than that in all the other groups (p < 0.05). The IVDMD, IVNDFD and IVADFD did not differ significantly among groups (p > 0.05).
As shown in Table 3, the of total volatile fatty acids (TVFAs), NH3-N and MCP concentrations in the EOC5 group were significantly higher than those in all the other groups (p < 0.05), the NH3-N and MCP concentrations in the EOC2 group were significantly lower than those in all the other groups (p < 0.05), and the TVFA concentration in the EOC1–EOC4 groups was significantly lower than that in the CON group (p < 0.05). In terms of the proportion of various VFAs, propionate was found to be the lowest in the CON group (p < 0.05), acetate and isovaleric acid and the ratio of acetic acid to propionic acid (A:P) were significantly higher in the CON group than in all the other groups (p < 0.05), butyrate was the highest in the EOC5 group (p < 0.05), valerianic acid was highest in the EOC1 group (p < 0.05) and the pH was not significantly different among the groups (p > 0.05).

3.3. Alteration in the Composition of the Rumen Bacterial Community

A total of 1,427,227 pairs of reads were obtained by high-throughput sequencing of the CON, EOC2 and EOC5 groups. A total of 1,413,142 clean tags were generated after splicing and filtering of the double-ended reads, with at least 71,328 clean tags generated for each sample and an average of 78,508 clean tags with an average sequence length of 420 bp. The number of OTUs for each sample was obtained by clustering tags at the 97% similarity level using USEARCH software, and a total of 597 OTUs were obtained, with 589 OTUs in the CON group, 584 OTUs in the EOC2 group and 596 OTUs in the EOC5 group (Figure 2A). The dilution curve depicted the species diversity and species richness of each sample, and the curves plateaued at 20,000 reads, indicating that the sequencing coverage was saturated (Figure 2B). The alpha diversity index has no significant difference (Table 4). A graph of the species accumulation shows that the number of species and shared species in the environment reached saturation with increasing sample size and did not increase with increasing sample size. NMDS (Figure 2C) showed that there were significant differences among the three groups of microbial species, and ANOSIM analysis further showed that the between-group differences were significantly greater than the within-group differences (Figure 2D).

3.4. Alteration of Rumen Microbial Composition Caused from EOC

At the taxonomic level, 18 phyla, 25 classes, 32 orders, 62 familys, 164 genus and 194 species were detected. At the phylum level, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Synergistetes were the dominant phyla, with a relative abundance greater than 1%, and the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes was the highest among all the groups, accounting for more than 88% of the total abundance (Figure 3A). The Bacteroidetes content was highest in the CON group (49.2%), lowest in the EOC5 group (46.8%) and highest in the EOC5 group (43.1%). At the genus level (Figure 3B), 73 genera had a relative abundance greater than 0.1%. Uncultured_bacterium_f_Muribaculaceae, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and uncultured_bacterium_f_F082 were the dominant genera in all three groups, where the top 10 species in terms of abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group had significantly lower relative abundance in the EOC5 group (p < 0.05), uncultured_bacterium_f_F082 had significantly lower relative abundance in both the EOC5 and EOC2 groups than in the CON group (p < 0.05), uncultured_ bacterium_f_Muribaculaceae and Succiniclasticum were significantly higher in terms of relative abundance in the EOC5 group (p < 0.05) and the abundance of the Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group was the lowest in the CON group, but the difference was not significant. ANOVA revealed significant differences in microflora between groups at the phylum and genus levels. LEfSe of samples between groups revealed (Figure 4) that there were 9, 7 and 3 biomarkers that significantly differed (LDA score > 4) in the CON, EOC2 and EOC5 groups, respectively, similar to the results of ANOVA, with significant differences between groups.

3.5. Interactions among In Vitro Digestibility, Fermentation Parameters and Rumen Microorganisms

A correlation heat map between microbial bacteria at the genus level in vitro in the rumen (relative abundance > 0.5%) and nutrient digestibility and fermentation parameters (correlation threshold > 0.1) was constructed, which is shown in Figure 5. DMD, NDFD and ADFD were found to cluster together, and GP and in vitro fermentation parameters clustered together. A total of 32 microbes at the genus level were significantly correlated, of which 16 were significantly positively correlated and of which 16 were significantly negatively correlated (p < 0.05). The uncultured_bacterium_f_Muribaculaceae, Succiniclasticum, Saccharofermentans, Lachnoclostridium_1 and Family_XIII_AD3011_groups were significantly positively correlated with GP and fermentation parameters (p < 0.05), and bacteria such as Rikenellaceae_RC9, Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 and Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 showed significant negative correlations (p < 0.05) with in vitro fermentation parameters.

4. Discussion

Previous studies had shown different effects of oregano essential oil and cobalt on rumen microbial activity and fermentation characteristics in ruminants due to different additive types and adding levels [16], which may be related to the type of EO, its structure and the substrate employed. Therefore, to develop new additives for EO binding to ultimately effectively regulate ruminant production, in this study, the effects of different gradients of oregano essential oil and cobalt lactate binding on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation patterns and microbiota were evaluated by in vitro incubation.
GP is an important indicator for feed fermentability and rumen microbes activities [22]. Methane accounts for a large portion of total rumen gas production in vitro. Macheboeuf found that 5 mM oregano EO inhibited 98% of methane production [23], because the phenolics in EO inhibit methanogenic and hydrogen-producing bacteria from reducing methane production rapidly [24]. So EOC led to the reduction of total GP at 12 h by inhibiting methane production in this study. The inhibition of EO on methanogenic bacteria was greater than that of other bacteria [25], which was one of reasons why we did not observe significant changes in the digestibility of nutrients. Adding cobalt to the diet could accelerate the rate of the rumen flora to synthesize vitamin B12 [26]. The high gas production in the EOC5 group after 12 h was due to the involvement of vitamin B12 as a coenzyme factor in the metabolism of carbohydrates to produce large amounts of carbon dioxide [27]. Nutrient digestibility reflects the degree of degradation of the feed by microbes in a fermentation system and the ease of digestion and utilization by animals [28]. Complex and diverse active chemical composition of plant essential oils results in different functional properties and effects on in vitro nutrient digestibility [29]. The addition of EOC below 800 mg·L−1 did not affect the nutrient digestibility while reducing VFA, because EO could reduce VFA by inhibiting starch hydrolyzing bacteria and protein hydrolyzing bacteria, but did not affect the activity of fiber degrading bacteria [30]. Co could form cross-linkages between bacteria and feed with negative electrical charge to improve feed digestibility [31], 1500 mg·L−1 EOC level is consistent with the inclusion levels that cobalt can quickly alter the concentration of rumen microbes and therefore promote rumen fermentation and nutrient degradation rates [26]. This suggests that EO and Co in EOC can produce synergistic effects in terms of mitigating methane emissions without reducing feed digestibility, increasing rumen cellulolytic bacteria activity and promoting rumen fermentation function.
Ruminal pH is an important indicator of the homeostasis of the rumen environment in ruminants and usually varies from 5.0 to 7.5 [32]. In this study, ruminal pH was at a normal level of 6.3–6.45. VFAs are the main products of carbohydrate degradation of food rations and provide most of the energy precursors for metabolic processes in ruminants. EO can reduce VFA production by inhibiting starch-hydrolyzing and protein-hydrolyzing bacteria [30], besides EO can reduce protozoa population and decrease acetic acid and total VFA [33]. The abovementioned reasons resulted in a significant reduction of TVFA and acetic acid when the EOC supplemental level was lower than 800 mg·L−1. However, we found that the molar ratio of propionic acid in all groups was significantly increased. Poudel found that adding EO can increase the concentration of propionic acid in the rumen of Holstein calves by increasing the content of Prevotellaceae [34]. As mentioned before, some microorganisms can use Co to synthesize vitamin B12 and other rumen microbial growth factors, and vitamin B12 deficiency can impair methylmalonyl CoA mutase activity, thus affecting propionate production and causing dysregulation of glucose homeostasis in ruminants [26], Co can promote nonstructural carbohydrate digestion and increase propionate ratios by reducing rumenomonas [35]. Higher propionic acid levels were generally considered beneficial for ruminant production [36]. The high concentration of EOC also increased the production of butyric acid in this study, which is generally considered to be a better VFA because it participates in the development of rumen papilla by stimulating rumen epithelial metabolism [34]. In summary, although the effects of different concentrations of EOC on the total TVFA are not consistent, this may be because the concentration thresholds for the best effects of oregano essential oil and cobalt lactate are not consistent. However, all gradients of EOC reduced the ratio of acetic acid to propionic acid (A:P) in the structure of VFA, which can increase the energy utilization of ruminants [37], and increase the molar ratio of beneficial VFAs such as propionic acid and butyric acid. Our research results show that EOC creates a VFA structure that is conducive to animal production. The concentration of NH3-N can reflect the degradation of nitrogenous substances in the diet and the utilization of ammonia by microbes, and some NH3-N can be synthesized by rumen microorganisms to synthesize MPC. Zhou reported that 92 mg·L−1 EO inclusion level reduced NH3-N concentration, we considered that EO reduces rumen ammonia nitrogen concentration and protein deamination by inhibiting high ammonia-producing bacteria [24]. The above evidence shows that EO at a level of about 100 mg·L−1 has the most effective inhibitory effect on NH3-N, while 1500 mg·L−1 EOC significantly increased NH3-N and MCP production. Our previous study found that the addition of 7 g/d of Co significantly increased NH3-N concentration in sheep [17], because high levels Co play a greater role in NH3-N synthesis and metabolism of nitrogenous substances [38]. The above results indicate that although EOC at different addition levels had different effects on a single index due to the two having different thresholds for optimal performance, overall oregano essential oil and cobalt exerted synergistic effects in changing rumen fermentation parameters such as VFA structure, NH3-N and MCP production, while the particular synergistic mechanisms and thresholds for both to exert their optimal effects remain to be studied in our subsequent studies.
After comparing the nutrient digestibility and fermentation parameters, we performed 16S rRNA sequencing. It was found that there was no significant difference in Alpha diversity. However, further analysis of NMDS and Anosim revealed that different EOC additions resulted in significant changes in the community composition and relative abundance of specific microorganisms, which may be due to the diversity of active ingredients in EO and the different sensitivity of different microorganisms to EO levels, resulting in differences in rumen microbial populations [39]. At the phylum level, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are the main dominant phyla. Firmicutes could improve the abundance of genes encoding enzymes related to energy metabolism [40], the high proportion (43.1%) of Firmicutes in the EOC5 group could promote the digestibility of oligosaccharides, starch and cellulose [41], then improve rumen fermentation level and help sheep digest and absorb nutrients. At the genus level, uncultured_bacterium_f_Muribaculaceae, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and uncultured_bacterium_f_F082 were the dominant genus. Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group was positively correlated abnormal glucose and lipid metabolism with a high-fat diet [28]. After reducing the abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and Prevotellaceae_UCG-001, the microorganisms that produced propionic acid and butyric acid increased due to the increase in available substrates [42]. We found that Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group was negatively correlated with in vitro fermentation parameters through correlation analysis, which showed that EOC changed the VFA composition by affected the abundance of Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, and had a positive effect on maintaining the normal glucose and lipid metabolism of sheep. We also found that uncultured_bacterium_f_Muribaculaceae and Succiniclasticum exhibited high abundance in the EOC5 group, uncultured_bacterium_f_Muribaculaceae could produce succinic acid through degradation of polysaccharides [43]. As an important intermediate in the synthesis of propionic acid, succinic acid generates glucose by the gluconeogenic pathway [44], while Succiniclasticum could use succinic acid to produce propionic acid [45]. uncultured_bacterium_f_Muribaculaceae and Succiniclasticum were positively correlated with in vitro fermentation parameters in the present study, and, based on this, we hypothesized that the additive level of EOC5 was just suitable for the proliferation of this type of rumen bacteria that could produce propionic acid [46], and then increased the feed digestion rate and rumen fermentation. Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 and Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 abundance were significantly negatively correlated with fermentation parameters, which is consistent with Yang’s finding of a negative correlation between Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 and Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 and VFA concentration and NH3-N concentration [47]. Prevotellaceae belongs to the Bacteroidetes, probably due to the addition of oregano essential oil and cobalt lactate, which affect Firmicutes abundance, thus limiting the reproduction of these low-abundance species. Due to the complex composition of EOC, its antibacterial mechanism against a single strain was difficult to predict. It is reported that some small molecules contained in EO could also interact with the cell membranes of gram-negative bacteria, thereby reducing their specificity and regulating rumen fermentation [48]. Vitamin B12 could affect the abundance of Prevotella, Bacteroides, Rumenobacter, and D-shaped bacteria Vibrio and Vibrio succinate [49]. In this study, the results of EOC regulation of some rumen microflora were found, and the corresponding findings were that they changed gas production and rumen fermentation, reflecting the effects of these microorganisms on rumen fermentation and nutrient digestibility. However, this study lacks the effect of single EO and CO at different addition level on these factors, so the specific mechanisms of EOC effects on digestive metabolism and rumen microbiota in sheep are to be studied in our subsequent continuation.

5. Conclusions

The addition of 1500 mg·L−1 EOC significantly improved GP parameters, and rumen fermentation parameters and altered the microbiota composition. Although we are not sure about the concrete contribution of a single EO and Co on these effects, the addition of different concentrations of EOC to sheep rumen in vitro cultures increased the nutrient digestibility, and altered rumen fermentation to a mode in which acetic acid decreased and propionic acid increased.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z. and T.J.; methodology, T.J.; software, Z.W.; validation, Z.W., X.L. and L.Z.; formal analysis, J.W.; investigation, Z.W.; resources, S.Z.; data curation, S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.W.; writing—review and editing, T.J.; visualization, T.J.; supervision, S.Z.; project administration, S.Z.; funding acquisition, T.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Science and Technology Innovation funds of Gansu Agricultural University, Young mentor support fund (GAU-QDFC-2018-04); Public welfare industry (agricultural) scientific research project of the Ministry of Agriculture (201503134 and 201303059); Modern agricultural industrial technology system (CARS-40-09b).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Animal Committee of Gansu Agricultural University (GSAU-2th-AST-2021-126).

Data Availability Statement

All data for this study are available at the corresponding author. The sequencing data were deposited into the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI (Accession Nos. SRR16263676-SRR16263693, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA769507 (accessed on 8 October 2021).

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all participants for their advice and support of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, S.; Cai, Y.; Zhu, H.; Tan, Z. Potential and constraints in the development of animal industries in China. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 1025–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agrawal, A.R.; Karim, S.A.; Kumar, R.; Sahoo, A.; John, P.J. Sheep and goat production: Basic differences, impact on climate and molecular tools for rumen microbiome study. Curr. Microbiol. 2014, 3, 2275–2284. [Google Scholar]
  3. Morgavi, D.P.; Kelly, W.J.; Janssen, P.H.; Attwood, G.T. Rumen microbial (meta)genomics and its application to ruminant production. Animal 2012, 7, 184–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Uyeno, Y.; Shigemori, S.; Shimosato, T. Effect of probiotics/prebiotics on cattle health and productivity. Microbes Environ. 2015, 30, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Simitzis, P.E. Enrichment of animal diets with essential oils—A great perspective on improving animal performance and quality characteristics of the derived products. Medicines 2017, 4, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Valdivieso, U.M.; Gomez, L.C.; Plaza, D.J.; Gil, A. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties of essential oils: A systematic review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zeng, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Piao, X. Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nagy, J.G.; Tengerdy, R.P. Antibacterial action of essential oils of artemisia as an ecological factor. Appl. Microbiol. 1967, 15, 819–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, R.; Wu, J.; Lang, X.; Liu, L.; Casper, D.P.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Wei, S. Effects of oregano essential oil on in vitro ruminal fermentation, methane production, and ruminal microbial community. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 2303–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Claudia, T.; Florian, C.S. Stability of essential oils: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 40–53. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lei, Z.; Zhang, K.; Li, C.; Wu, J.; Davis, D.; Casper, D.; Jiang, H.; Jiao, T.; Wang, X.; Wang, J. Dietary supplementation with essential-oils-cobalt for improving growth performance, meat quality and skin cell capacity of goats. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Poudel, P. An Evaluation of Rumen Modifiers for Lactational Performance and Nutrient Digestibility by Cows. Master’s Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pretz, J.P. Improving Feed Efficiency through Forage Strategies for Increasing Dairy Profitability and Sustainability. Ph.D. Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, T.; Chen, H.; Bai, Y.; Wu, J.; Cheng, S.; He, B.; Casper, D.P. Calf starter containing a blend of essential oils and prebiotics affects the growth performance of Holstein calves—ScienceDirect. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 2315–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Simitzis, P.E.; Deligeorgis, S.G.; Bizelis, J.A.; Dardamani, A.; Theodosiou, I.; Fegeros, K. Effect of dietary oregano oil supplementation on lamb meat characteristics. Meat. Sci. 2008, 79, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hassan, F.U.; Arshad, M.A.; Ebeid, H.M.; Rehman, M.S.; Khan, M.S.; Shahid, S.; Yang, C. Phytogenic additives can modulate rumen microbiome to mediate fermentation kinetics and methanogenesis through exploiting diet-microbe interaction. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 575801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiao, T.; Wu, J.; Casper, D.P.; Davis, D.I.; Brown, M.A.; Zhao, S.; Liang, J.; Lei, Z.; Holloway, B. Feeding sheep cobalt and oregano essential oil alone or in combination on ruminal nutrient digestibility, fermentation, and fiber digestion combined with scanning electron microscopy. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 639432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Menke, K.H.; Steingass, H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 1988, 28, 7–55. [Google Scholar]
  19. AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 21th ed.; AOAC International: Rockville, MD, USA, 2019; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, Q.; Gong, J.; Huang, X.; Yu, H.; Xue, F. In vitro evaluation of the activity of microencapsulated carvacrol against Escherichia coli with K88 pili. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 107, 1781–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, Z.; Meng, Q.; Yu, Z. Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro ruminal cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 2634–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. McIntosh, F.M.; Williams, P.; Losa, R.; Wallace, R.J.; Beever, D.A.; Newbold, C.J. Effects of essential oils on ruminal microorganisms and their protein metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 5011–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Macheboeuf, D.; Morgavi, D.; Papon, J. Dose–response effects of essential oils on in vitro fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 145, 335–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patra, A.; Yu, Z. Effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation by, and abundance and diversity of, rumen microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 4271–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Cobellis, G.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M.; Marcotullio, M.C.; Yu, Z. Evaluation of different essential oils in modulating methane and ammonia production, rumen fermentation, and rumen bacteria in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 215, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. González, J.; Escalera, F.; Alonso, A. Relationship between Vitamin B12 and Cobalt Metabolism in Domestic Ruminant: An Update. Animals 2020, 10, 1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Herdt, T.H.; Hoff, B. The Use of Blood Analysis to Evaluate Trace Mineral Status in Ruminant Livestock. Vet. Clin. N. Am.-Food A 2011, 27, 255–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xue, H.F.; Meng, Q.X. Recent Nutritional Advances of Neutral Detergent Fiber in Dairy Cow. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2007, 19, 454–458. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DWYX2007S1007.htm (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  29. Cobellis, G.; Trabalza, M.; Yu, Z. Critical evaluation of essential oils as rumen modifiers in ruminant nutrition: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 3, 545–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Patra, A.K. Effects of Essential Oils on Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Ecology and Ruminant Production. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2011, 6, 416–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lopez, J.M.; Satter, L.D. Effect of copper and cobalt addition on digestion and growth in heifers fed diets containing alfalfa silage or corn crop residues. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, S.; Dagar, S.S.; Sirohi, S.K. Microbial profiles, in vitro gas production and dry matter digestibility based on various ratios of roughage to concentrate. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khiaosa, R.; Zebeli, Q. Meta-analysis of the effects of essential oils and their bioactive compounds on rumen fermentation characteristics and feed efficiency in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 1819–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Poudel, P.; Froehlich, K.; Casper, D.P. Feeding Essential Oils to Neonatal Holstein Dairy Calves Results in Increased Ruminal Prevotellaceae Abundance and Propionate Concentrations. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C. Effects of folic acid and cobalt sulphate supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestion, rumen fermentation and blood metabolites in Holstein calves. Br. J. Nutr. 2021, 21, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bergman, E.N. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol. Rev. 1990, 70, 567–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Calsamiglia, S.; Busquet, M.; Cardozo, P.W.; Castillejos, L. Invited review: Essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 2580–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ramalho, M.J.; Andrade, S.; Coelho, M.A.N.; Loureiro, J.A.; Pereira, M.C. Molecular interactions between Vitamin B12 and membrane models: A biophysical study for new insights into the bioavailability of Vitamin. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2020, 194, 111187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sakkas, H.; Papadopoulou, C. Antimicrobial Activity of Basil, Oregano, and Thyme Essential Oils. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kaakoush, N.O. Insights into the Role of Erysipelotrichaceae in the Human Host. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2015, 5, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ahmad, A.A.; Yang, C.; Zhang, J.; Kalwar, Q.; Liang, Z.; Li, C. Effects of Dietary Energy Levels on Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Diversity, and Feed Efficiency of Yaks (Bos grunniens). Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cai, B.; Pan, J.; Chen, H.; Chen, X.; Ye, Z.; Yuan, H.; Sun, H.; Wan, P. Oyster polysaccharides ameliorate intestinal mucositis and improve metabolism in 5-fluorouracil-treated S180 tumour-bearing mice. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 256, 117545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ormerod, K.L.; Wood, D.L.; Lachner, N.; Gellatly, S.L.; Daly, J.N.; Parsons, J.D. Genomic characterization of the uncultured Bacteroidales family S24-7 inhabiting the guts of homeothermic animals. Microbiome 2016, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Reichardt, N.; Duncan, S.H.; Young, P.; Belenguer, A. Phylogenetic distribution of three pathways for propionate production within the human gut microbiota. ISME J. 2014, 8, 1323–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Dias, J.; Marcondes, M.I.; Noronha, M.F.; Resende, R.T.; Machado, F.S.; Mantovani, H.C. Effect of Pre-weaning Diet on the Ruminal Archaeal, Bacterial, and Fungal Communities of Dairy Calves. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shabat, S.K.; Sasson, G.; Doron, A.; Durman, T.; Yaacoby, S.; Berg, M.E.; White, B.A. Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2958–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yang, C.; Tsedan, G.; Liu, Y.; Hou, F. Shrub coverage alters the rumen bacterial community of yaks (Bos grunniens) grazing in alpine meadows. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2020, 62, 504–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Benchaar, C.; Greathead, H. Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166, 338–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Franco, J.; Duplessis, M.; Bui, A.; Reymond, C. Correlations between the Composition of the Bovine Microbiota and Vitamin B(12) Abundance. mSystems 2020, 5, e00107–e00120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Variation of gas production at 0~48 h. * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Variation of gas production at 0~48 h. * p < 0.05.
Animals 12 00118 g001
Figure 2. Diversity analysis. (A) operational taxonomic units-Venn (OTU-Venn) analysis; (B) dilution curve analysis; (C) nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis; (D) Anosim analysis box plot.EOC, 0.1425% cobalt lactate + 1.13% oregano essential oil + 98.7275% carrier; CON, control group, that is, 0 mg·L−1 EOC addition level.
Figure 2. Diversity analysis. (A) operational taxonomic units-Venn (OTU-Venn) analysis; (B) dilution curve analysis; (C) nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis; (D) Anosim analysis box plot.EOC, 0.1425% cobalt lactate + 1.13% oregano essential oil + 98.7275% carrier; CON, control group, that is, 0 mg·L−1 EOC addition level.
Animals 12 00118 g002
Figure 3. (A) Relative abundance of phylum horizontal species; (B) relative abundance of genus horizontal species.
Figure 3. (A) Relative abundance of phylum horizontal species; (B) relative abundance of genus horizontal species.
Animals 12 00118 g003
Figure 4. Significantly different bacterial taxa identified by the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe).
Figure 4. Significantly different bacterial taxa identified by the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe).
Animals 12 00118 g004
Figure 5. Correlation heat map. Note: ADFD, acid detergent fiber digestibility; DMD, dry matter digestibility; NDFD, neutral detergent fiber digestibility; GP, gas production; TVFA, total volatile fatty acids; AP, the ratio of acetic acid to propionic acid; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Correlation heat map. Note: ADFD, acid detergent fiber digestibility; DMD, dry matter digestibility; NDFD, neutral detergent fiber digestibility; GP, gas production; TVFA, total volatile fatty acids; AP, the ratio of acetic acid to propionic acid; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Animals 12 00118 g005
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of the fully mixed diet (air drying basis).
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of the fully mixed diet (air drying basis).
IngredientsContent (%)NutrientContent
Whole corn silage72.96Digestible energy, ME/(M J kg−1)11.58
Corn14.41Digestible energy, DE/(M J kg−1)14.12
Wheat bran4.00Dry matter, DM (%)36.23
Cottonseed meal3.86Crude Protein, CP (%)14.73
Rapeseed meal 3.59Calcium, Ca (%)0.76
Calcium Hydrogen Phosohate0.31Phosphorus P (%)0.65
Limestone0.31Ether extract, EE (%)2.50
Salt0.27Neutral detergent fiber, NDF (%)35.81
1% Premix 10.29Acid detergent fiber, ADF (%)20.01
Total100
1 One kilogram of the premix contained the following: VA 650,000 IU, VD3 300,000 IU, VE 400,000 IU, Fe 500 mg, Cu 500 mg, Mn 1000 mg, Zn 500 mg, Co 15 mg, Se 40 mg. Metabolic energy and digestible energy were calculated, and other values are measured.
Table 2. Effects of EOC on gas production parameters.
Table 2. Effects of EOC on gas production parameters.
ItemsEOC1EOC2EOC3EOC4EOC5CONSEMp-Valve
GP24 h 1 (mL)59.4 c48.83 d48.03 d47.4 d79.00 a74.58 b2.79<0.001
IVDMD 2 (%)67.9968.0267.9868.0269.4467.31.140.062
IVNDFD 3 (%)59.2758.857.9859.6860.7958.42.060.21
IVADFD 4 (%)35.7634.9433.0735.4934.532.893.570.654
1 GP24 h, 24-h gas production capacity. 2 IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility. 3 IVNDFD, in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility. 4 IVADFD, in vitro acid detergent fiber digestibility. SEM: Standard error of the mean. a,b,c,d Values with different superscripts in the same row are significant different (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Effects of EOC on rumen fermentation parameters.
Table 3. Effects of EOC on rumen fermentation parameters.
ItemsEOC1EOC2EOC3EOC4EOC5CONSEMp-Valve
NH3-N (mg dL−1)27.42 b24.76 c27.33 b27.32 b28.84 a27.04 b1.53<0.001
TVFA (mmol l−1) 178.44 d68.89 e84.63 c77.01 d104.56 a95.55 b3.78<0.001
MCP (mg mL−1) 23.48 b2.16 c3.59 b3.43 b3.91 a3.58 b0.16<0.001
pH6.41 6.42 6.38 6.45 6.30 6.350.170.313
Acetate (% 3)46.1 c46.39 c47.77 b48.02 b48.53 b50.97 a0.81<0.001
Propionate (%)31.89 b34.01 a33.75 a32.46 b29.76 c28.75 d0.68<0.001
Isobutyric acid (%)1.98 1.88 1.89 1.84 1.991.960.150.008
Butyrate (%)11.66 b10.88 c10.88 c11.69 b12.65 a10.59 c0.52<0.001
Isovaleric acid (%)3.84 a3.26 b3.03 b3.2 b4.04 a3.84 a0.28<0.001
Valerianic acid (%)4.53 a3.69 b3.48 b3.48 b3.51 b3.53 b0.41<0.001
A/P 41.45 cd1.37 e1.42 de1.48 c1.63 b1.77 a0.05<0.001
1 TVFA, Total volatile fatty acids. 2 MCP, Microbial protein. 3 The unit % represents the proportion of a single VFA in the TVFA. 4 A/P, the ratio of acetic acid to propionic acid. SEM: Standard error of the mean. a,b,c,d,e Values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05). The same below.
Table 4. Effects of different additive treatments on diversity index.
Table 4. Effects of different additive treatments on diversity index.
Index TypeEOC2EOC5CONSEMp-Valve
Shannon6.836.936.770.1340.163
Simpson0.9780.9790.9750.0030.17
ACE558.09575.31573.1314.010.057
Chao1564.1577.34576.1711.260.112
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Wu, J.; Zhao, S.; Jiao, T. Effect of Oregano Oil and Cobalt Lactate on Sheep In Vitro Digestibility, Fermentation Characteristics and Rumen Microbial Community. Animals 2022, 12, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010118

AMA Style

Wang Z, Li X, Zhang L, Wu J, Zhao S, Jiao T. Effect of Oregano Oil and Cobalt Lactate on Sheep In Vitro Digestibility, Fermentation Characteristics and Rumen Microbial Community. Animals. 2022; 12(1):118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010118

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhengwen, Xiongxiong Li, Lingyun Zhang, Jianping Wu, Shengguo Zhao, and Ting Jiao. 2022. "Effect of Oregano Oil and Cobalt Lactate on Sheep In Vitro Digestibility, Fermentation Characteristics and Rumen Microbial Community" Animals 12, no. 1: 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010118

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop