Next Article in Journal
Important Mycoses of Wildlife: Emphasis on Etiology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Pathology—A Review: PART 1
Next Article in Special Issue
The Economic Burden of Chromosome Translocations and the Benefits of Enhanced Screening for Cattle Breeding
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Folic Acid Supplements on Progesterone Profile and Blood Metabolites of Heat-Stressed Holstein Cows during the Early Stage of Pregnancy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economics of Rebreeding Nonpregnant Dairy Cows Diagnosed by Transrectal Ultrasonography on Day 25 after Artificial Insemination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

The Uterus as an Influencing Factor for Late Embryo/Early Fetal Loss—A Clinical Update

1
Department of Obstetrics and Farm Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1078 Budapest, Hungary
2
Department of Animal Husbandry and Welfare, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary
3
Transfer in Bovine Reproduction SLu, 22300 Barbastro, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(15), 1873; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151873
Submission received: 10 June 2022 / Revised: 11 July 2022 / Accepted: 20 July 2022 / Published: 22 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dairy Cattle Reproduction)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Pregnancy loss following a positive pregnancy diagnosis in the absence of infectious disease of the reproductive system is a main factor limiting reproductive efficiency in high producing dairy cows. We describe here some circumstances such as the age of the dam, retained placenta and uterine size in which the uterus may be associated with pregnancy loss.

Abstract

Here we revise circumstances of non-infectious causes in which the uterus may be associated with pregnancy loss during the late embryo/early fetal period (following a positive pregnancy diagnosis in lactating dairy cows). As the uterine size increases with parity and pregnant heifers with no detrimental effects of a previous parturition, a primigravid uterus is proposed as a reference for identifying risk factors that negatively influence pregnancy in lactating cows. Cows suffering placenta retention or with a large uterus at insemination were selected as topics for this revision. Retained placenta, that occurs around parturition, has a long-lasting influence on subsequent pregnancy loss. Although retained placenta is a particularly predisposing factor for uterine infection, farm conditions along with cow factors of non-infectious cause and their interactions have been identified as main factors favoring this disorder. A large uterus (cervix and uterine horns lying outside the pelvic cavity) with no detectable abnormalities has been associated with low fertility and with a greater incidence of pregnancy loss. A large reproductive tract may well derive from an inadequate uterine involution. Therefore, peripartum management and strategies to reduce the incidence of uterine disorders should reduce their associated financial losses in the herds.

1. Introduction

Pregnancy loss in the absence of infectious disease of the reproductive system is a main factor limiting reproductive efficiency in high producing dairy cows. Following a positive pregnancy diagnosis 28–34 days post-artificial insemination (AI), pregnancy loss mainly occurs before day 60 of gestation [1,2,3,4]. Implantation is firmly established following this time interval [5,6] and the chances of losses are much lower [1,3,4]. The embryonic period of pregnancy spans from conception until the end of the differentiation stage (about 45 days), and the fetal period runs from day 45 of pregnancy to parturition [7]. Most losses occur in the early embryonic period, with the greatest increment of loss between days 15 and 18 [1]. However, losses during the late embryonic period can substantially exceed 20% [2,3,4], or even 40% [8,9] and cause a major economic impact in dairy herds [10,11]. The cost resulting from each cow suffering pregnancy failure can easily exceed $2000 due to an extended non-pregnant period and increased risk of culling [10]. Although an accurate pregnancy diagnosis can be performed on day 20 of gestation, using ultrasonography or conceptus protein determinations [4,12], pregnancy is routinely diagnosed on days 28–34 post-AI [4,13]. Numerous factors of non-infectious nature [1,2,3,4] and postpartum diseases [14,15,16,17] have been associated with pregnancy loss. Here we highlight circumstances of non-infectious cause in which the uterus may be associated with pregnancy loss during the late embryo/early fetal period in lactating dairy cows.

2. The Primigravid Uterus

The uterine size increases with parity [18,19], with dam age being a main factor associated with pregnancy loss [3,20,21]. Therefore, it should be expected that the primigravid uterus, with no detrimental effects of parturition and not exposed to the various metabolic and environmental stresses associated with the lactation period, may favor pregnancy maintenance in heifers when compared to parous cows. In effect, pregnant heifers show the lowest risk of pregnancy loss compared to lactating cows [22,23,24]. With registered losses of 9.6% (303/3162) for parous cows and 2.8% (29/1050) for heifers and using parous cows as reference, the odds ratio for the pregnancy loss in heifers was 0.28 (p = 0.0001) [22]. In a compilation of studies, 10.7% (663/6195) of losses were reported for lactating cows and 2.52% (84/3333) for primigravid heifers [24]. However, this difference may currently be masked with the use of sexed semen. The use of sex-sorted sperm, particularly for heifers and primiparous cows [25,26], has increased during the last two decades [27,28,29]. In this context, the use of sexed semen in heifers may increase the incidence of pregnancy loss [30]. This disadvantage to maintain a gestation derived from sexed semen should be assessed in extensive studies. While the refinement of the sex-sorting technology after 2015 has resulted in a better reproductive performance, the use of sexed semen leaves much scope for improvement [29]. Therefore, pregnant heifers following AI with conventional semen remain a good reference in studying factors influencing pregnancy loss in lactating cows.

3. Retained Placenta

The fetal membranes are physiologically expelled within two to eight hours after the delivery of the fetus [31], whereas retention of the entire or of parts of the membranes beyond 12 h is considered a pathological condition [31,32,33]. With a percentage of pregnancy loss of 9.6% (291/3022) in a study population with 6.3% (192/3022) cows suffering placenta retention and using cows with no retained placenta as reference, the odds ratio for the pregnancy loss in retained placenta cows was 1.8 (p = 0.005) [34]. The interval from previous parturition to pregnancy ranged from 30 to 496 days and could not be associated with the risk of pregnancy loss [29]. Although only clinically normal cows were inseminated, previous retained placenta could cause non-detected uterine lesions favoring subsequent pregnancy loss [29]. This suggests a long-lasting influence of previous retained placenta on pregnancy loss. In a more recent study, a risk factor for 126 herds having a high prevalence of pregnancy loss was ≥4.9% retained placenta [15].
The precise mechanisms that lead to placental release are not well understood. Expulsion of fetal membranes involves multiple hormonal, physical and immunological changes [35,36,37]. Although retained placenta is a particularly predisposing factor for uterine infection [38,39,40], farm conditions along with cow factors of non-infectious cause and their interactions have been identified as main factors favoring this disorder [41,42,43]. Therefore, strategies to reduce the incidence of retained placenta in the herds cannot be overemphasized. It is so critical that it is likely to determine how poorly the cow will perform during the lactation. The cost due to retained placenta has been estimated up to $481 and has been mainly associated with reduction in milk production [44]. In other words, financial consequences associated with placenta retention should be added to those pregnancy loss noted above.

4. Uterine Size

A negative association between uterine size and fertility has been described in lactating dairy cows [45,46,47]. A reproductive tract score system was developed to identify decreased fertility in lactating dairy cows with non-detectable reproductive disorders [46]. This system considers the size and position of the reproductive tract relative to the pelvis [46]. Briefly, cows undergoing pre-breeding exams using transrectal palpation were registered with a reproductive tract small (small uterine horns that rested within the pelvic cavity), medium (longer uterine horns resting partially outside the pelvic cavity), or large (larger cervix and uterine horns lying outside the pelvic cavity) [46]. Cows with large reproductive tracts had reduced fertility and a greater incidence of pregnancy loss between 31- and 60-days post-AI [47]. Pregnancy loss was increased in cows with a large reproductive tract compared to medium and small size (24.3% vs. 11.6 ± 0.02 and 9.4 ± 0.02%, respectively; p = 0.04) [47]. Primiparous cows had a higher frequency (p < 0.01) of small reproductive tract and a lower frequency of large reproductive tract when compared with multiparous cows (small: 42.6 vs. 15.0%; large: 7.0 vs. 22.0%, respectively) [47]. Interestingly, there was no interaction between parity and uterine size on pregnancy at AI [46,47]. This suggests that the reproductive tract score system may be a better indicator of low fertility than lactation number. Culling was associated among other factors with the uterine size [47]. Unfortunately, previous uterine disorders such as placenta retention or endometritis were not included in these studies. Further studies are necessary to determine factors influencing the development of a large uterus. A large reproductive tract may well derive from an inadequate uterine involution. Alterations in the uterine environment might undermine the delicate process of placentation predisposing to pregnancy loss. Moreover, the process of conceptus/maternal attachment between 36 and 47 days of gestation shows a high degree of individual variation [6]. This means that a large uterus can take much longer to complete placentation, a vulnerable process which would be exposed for a longer time to different types of stress.

5. Conclusions

A primigravid uterus may be a good reference in studying risk factors that negatively influence pregnancy in lactating cows.
Retained placenta has a long-lasting influence on subsequent pregnancy loss. Therefore, calving management and strategies to reduce the incidence of this uterine disorder will reduce its associated financial losses in the herds.
Size and position of the uterus may provide a useful source of information to identify strategies to reduce pregnancy losses.

Author Contributions

Investigation and writing—original draft preparation, Z.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.K.; supervision and editing, O.S.; conceptualization, review and editing, F.L.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Project no. 141437 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the MEC_R_21 funding scheme. The Project is also supported by the European Union and co-financed by the European Social Fund (grant agreement no. EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00005, project title: Strengthening the scientific replacement by supporting the academic workshops and programs of students, developing a mentoring process).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ball, P.J.H. Late embryo and early fetal mortality in the cow. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 1997, 65, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  2. Grimard, B.; Freret, S.; Chevallier, A.; Pinto, A.; Ponsart, C.; Humblot, P. Genetic and environmental factors influencing first service conception rate and late embryonic/foetal mortality in low fertility dairy herds. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006, 91, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. López-Gatius, F. Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review. Theriogenology 2012, 77, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ealy, A.D.; Seekford, Z.K. Predicting pregnancy loss in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 11798–11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Curran, S.; Pierson, R.A.; Ginther, O.J. Ultrasonographic appearance of the bovine conceptus from days 20 through 60. JAVMA 1986, 189, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar]
  6. Riding, G.A.; Lehnert, S.A.; French, A.J.; Hill, J.R. Conceptus-related measurements during the first trimester of bovine pregnancy. Vet. J. 2008, 175, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Committee on Bovine Reproductive Nomenclature. Recommendations for standardizing bovine reproductive terms. Cornell Vet. 1972, 62, 216–237. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cartmill, J.A.; El-Zarkouny, S.Z.; Hensley, B.A.; Rozell, T.G.; Smith, J.F.; Stevenson, J.S. An alternative AI breeding protocol for dairy cows exposed to elevated ambient temperatures before or after calving or both. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pohler, K.G.; Pereira, M.H.C.; Lopes, F.R.; Lawrence, J.C.; Keisler, D.H.; Smith, M.F.; Vasconcelos, J.L.M.; Green, J.A. Circulating concentrations of bovine pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and late embryonic mortality in lactating dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 1584–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lee, J.-I.; Kim, I.-H. Pregnancy loss in dairy cows: The contributing factors, the effects on reproductive performance and the economic impact. J. Vet. Sci. 2007, 8, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cabrera, V.E. A simple formulation and solution to the replacement problem: A practical tool to assess the economic cow value, the value of a new pregnancy, and the cost of a pregnancy loss. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 4683–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Szenci, O. Recent Possibilities for the diagnosis of early pregnancy and embryonic mortality in dairy cows. Animals 2021, 11, 1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wiltbank, M.C.; Baez, G.M.; Garcia-Guerra, A.; Toledo, M.Z.; Monteiro, P.L.J.; Melo, L.F.; Ochoa, J.C.; Santos, J.E.P.; Sartori, R. Pivotal periods for pregnancy loss during the first trimester of gestation in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ribeiro, E.S.; Gomes, G.; Greco, L.F.; Cerri, R.L.A.; Vieira-Neto, A.; Monteiro, P.L.J., Jr.; Lima, F.S.; Bisinotto, R.S.; Thatcher, W.W.; Santos, J.E.P. Carryover effect of postpartum inflammatory diseases on developmental biology and fertility in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 2201–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dubuc, J.; Denis-Robichaud, J. A dairy herd-level study of postpartum diseases and their association with reproductive performance and culling. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 3068–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dahl, M.O.; De Vries, A.; Galvão, K.N.; Maunsell, F.P.; Risco, C.A.; Hernandez, J.A. Combined effect of mastitis and parity on pregnancy loss in lactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology 2020, 143, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pinedo, P.; Santos, J.E.P.; Chebel, R.C.; Galvão, K.N.; Schuenemann, G.M.; Bicalho, R.C.; Gilbert, R.O.; Rodriguez Zas, S.; Seabury, C.M.; Rosa, G.; et al. Early-lactation diseases and fertility in 2 seasons of calving across US dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 10560–10576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Morrow, D.A.; Roberts, S.J.; McEntee, K. A review of postpartum ovarian activity and involution of the uterus and cervix in cattle. Cornell Vet. 1969, 59, 134–154. [Google Scholar]
  19. Morrow, D.A.; Roberts, S.J.; McEntee, K.A. Pospartum ovarian activity and involution of the uterus and cervix in dairy cattle. II. Involution of uterus and cervix. Cornell Vet. 1969, 59, 190–198. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hanson, T.; Bedrick, E.J.; Johnson, W.O.; Thurmond, M.C. A mixture model for bovine abortion and foetal survival. Stat. Med. 2003, 22, 1725–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thurmond, M.C.; Branscum, A.J.; Johnson, W.O.; Bedrick, E.J.; Hanson, T.E. Predicting the probability of abortion in dairy cows: A hierarchical Bayesian logistic-survival model using sequential pregnancy data. Prev. Vet. Med. 2005, 68, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Labèrnia, J.; López-Gatius, F.; Santolaria, P.; López-Béjar, M.; Rutllant, J. Influence of management factors on pregnancy Attrition in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 1996, 45, 1247–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Markusfeld-Nir, O. Epidemiology of bovine abortions in Israeli dairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 1997, 31, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Santos, J.E.P.; Thatcher, W.W.; Chebel, R.C.; Cerri, R.L.A.; Galvão, K.N. The Effect of embryonic death rates in cattle on the efficacy of estrus synchronization programs. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004, 82–83, 513–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Norman, H.D.; Hutchison, J.L.; Miller, R.H. Use of sexed semen and its effect on conception rate, calf sex, dystocia, and stillbirth of Holsteins in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 3880–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Healy, A.A.; House, J.K.; Thomson, P.C. Artificial insemination field data on the use of sexed and conventional semen in nulliparous Holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 1905–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Holden, S.A.; Butler, S.T. Review: Applications and benefits of sexed semen in dairy and beef herds. Animal 2018, 12S1, s97–s103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ruelle, E.; Shalloo, L.; Butler, S.T. Economic impact of different strategies to use sex-sorted sperm for reproductive management in seasonal-calving, pasture-based dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 11747–11758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reese, S.; Pirez, M.C.; Steele, H.; Kölle, S. The reproductive success of bovine sperm after sex-sorting: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 17366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Underwood, S.L.; Bathgate, R.; Ebsworth, M.; Maxwell, W.M.; Evans, G. Pregnancy loss in heifers after artificial insemination with frozen-thawed, sex-sorted, re-frozen-thawed dairy bull sperm. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 118, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wetherill, G.D. Retained placenta in the bovine. A brief review. Can. Vet. J. 1966, 6, 290–294. [Google Scholar]
  32. Laven, R.A.; Peters, A.R. Bovine retained placenta: Aetiology, pathogenesis and economic loss. Vet. Rec. 1996, 139, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Peter, A.T. Bovine placenta: A review on morphology, components, and defects from terminology and clinical perspectives. Theriogenology 2013, 80, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. López-Gatius, F.; Labèrnia, J.; Santolaria, P.; López-Béjar, M.; Rutllant, J. Effect of reproductive disorders previous to conception on pregnancy attrition in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1996, 46, 643–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hansen, P.J. Physiology and Endocrinology Symposium: Maternal immunological adjustments to pregnancy and parturition in ruminants and possible implications for postpartum uterine health: Is there a prepartum-postpartum nexus? J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 1639–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nelli, R.K.; De Koster, J.; Roberts, J.N.; de Souza, J.; Lock, A.L.; Raphael, W.; Agnew, D.; Contreras, G.A. Impact of uterine macrophage phenotype on placental retention in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2019, 127, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hooshmandabbasi, R.; Kazemian, A.; Zerbe, H.; Kowalewski, M.P.; Klisch, K. Macrophages in bovine term placenta: An ultrastructural and molecular study. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2021, 56, 1243–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sheldon, I.M.; Lewis, G.S.; LeBlanc, S.; Gilbert, R.O. Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology 2006, 65, 1516–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sheldon, I.M.; Williams, E.J.; Miller, A.N.; Nash, D.M.; Herath, S. Uterine diseases in cattle after parturition. Vet. J. 2008, 176, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. LeBlanc, S.J. Postpartum uterine disease and dairy herd reproductive performance: A review. Vet. J. 2008, 176, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Markusfeld, O. Periparturient traits in seven high dairy herds. Incidence rates, association with parity, and interrelationships among traits. J. Dairy Sci. 1987, 70, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N.; Ardalan, M. Cow-specific risk factors for retained placenta, metritis and clinical mastitis in Holstein cows. Vet. Res. Commun. 2011, 35, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mahnani, A.; Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, A.; Ansari-Mahyari, S.; Ghorbani, G.R.; Keshavarzi, H. Farm and cow factors and their interactions on the incidence of retained placenta in Holstein dairy cows. Theriogenology 2021, 159, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mahnani, A.; Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, A.; Ansari-Mahyari, S.; Ghorbani, G.R.; Keshavarzi, H. Assessing the consequences and economic impact of retained placenta in Holstein dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2021, 175, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Baez, G.M.; Barletta, R.V.; Guenther, J.N.; Gaska, J.M.; Wiltbank, M.C. Effect of uterine size on fertility of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Young, C.D.; Schrick, F.N.; Pohler, K.G.; Saxton, A.M.; Di Croce, F.A.; Roper, D.A.; Wilkerson, J.B.; Edwards, J.L. Short communication: A reproductive tract scoring system to manage fertility in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 5922–5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Madureira, A.; Poole, R.K.; Burnett, T.A.; Guida, T.G.; Edwards, J.L.; Schrick, F.N.; Vasconcelos, J.; Cerri, R.; Pohler, K.G. Size and position of the reproductive tract impacts fertility outcomes and pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2020, 158, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szelényi, Z.; Kovács, L.; Szenci, O.; Lopez-Gatius, F. The Uterus as an Influencing Factor for Late Embryo/Early Fetal Loss—A Clinical Update. Animals 2022, 12, 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151873

AMA Style

Szelényi Z, Kovács L, Szenci O, Lopez-Gatius F. The Uterus as an Influencing Factor for Late Embryo/Early Fetal Loss—A Clinical Update. Animals. 2022; 12(15):1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szelényi, Zoltán, Levente Kovács, Ottó Szenci, and Fernando Lopez-Gatius. 2022. "The Uterus as an Influencing Factor for Late Embryo/Early Fetal Loss—A Clinical Update" Animals 12, no. 15: 1873. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop