Next Article in Journal
High-Resolution Ultrasonographic Anatomy of the Carpal Tendons of Sporting Border Collies
Previous Article in Journal
Suitable Habitats of Chrysolophus spp. Need Urgent Protection from Habitat Fragmentation in China: Especially Suitable Habitats in Non-Nature Reserve Areas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Identification of Sarcocystis Species in Sheep from Lithuania

by
Alina Marandykina-Prakienė
,
Dalius Butkauskas
,
Naglis Gudiškis
,
Evelina Juozaitytė-Ngugu
,
Vytautas Januškevičius
,
Eglė Rudaitytė-Lukošienė
and
Petras Prakas
*
Nature Research Centre, Akademijos Str. 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(16), 2048; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162048
Submission received: 14 July 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 10 August 2022 / Published: 11 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Products)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Members of the genus Sarcocystis (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) are protozoans that have a two-host, prey–predator life cycle. These parasites are most thoroughly examined in economically important animals. Several Sarcocystis species are known to form macroscopic and microscopic sarcocysts in the muscle tissues of sheep. A previous study carried out in Lithuania has shown a maximum Sarcocystis infection prevalence in sheep and a high parasite burden; however, species were not identified. In the present study, diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart samples of 69 sheep raised in Lithuania were examined. No macrocysts were detected in the sheep muscles, while the microcysts found corresponded to two morphological types. By molecular methods, two Sarcocystis species, S. arieticanis and S. tenella, using canids as their definitive hosts, were identified for the first time in sheep from Lithuania. Both species were detected in all the studied animals. In summary, very high detection rates of S. arieticanis and S. tenella ranging from 82.61% to 100% were established in the examined diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart muscle samples of sheep.

Abstract

Data on the distribution of different Sarcocystis species in various muscles of sheep are scarce. In the present study, 190 diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart muscle samples of 69 sheep raised in Lithuania were examined for the presence of Sarcocystis spp. Under a light microscope, two morphological types of microcysts corresponding to S. arieticanis and S. tenella were detected. Eight and 12 sarcocysts of S. arieticanis and S. tenella, respectively, were isolated and characterised by the sequencing of a portion of cox1. The sequence comparisons revealed the highest similarity between European and Asian isolates of S. arieticanis and S. tenella obtained from domestic sheep and other wild Caprinae hosts. Based on peptic digestion, nested PCR targeting cox1, and sequencing, a 100% infection prevalence of S. arieticanis and S. tenella was observed in the 69 studied animals. The occurrence of S. tenella was significantly higher in the diaphragm than in the oesophagus (χ2 = 13.14, p < 0.001), whereas differences in the prevalence of S. arieticanis in the studied muscle types were insignificant (χ2 = 1.28, p > 0.05). Further molecularly based epidemiological studies are needed to compare the prevalence of Sarcocystis species in various muscles of sheep raised in different geographic regions.

1. Introduction

Representatives of the genus Sarcocystis (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) are protozoans widespread globally in mammals, birds, and reptiles. These parasites are characterized by a two-host, prey–predator life cycle. Sarcocysts are formed mainly in the muscles of the intermediate host, while sporocysts develop in the small intestine of the definitive host. The intermediate host gets infected through contaminated food or water, and the definitive host is infected by ingesting mainly muscular tissues containing mature sarcocysts [1].
Economically important animals, such as cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs, have most comprehensively been examined for Sarcocystis infection [2]. Four Sarcocystis species, S. arieticanis, S. tenella, S. gigantea, and S. medusiformis, using sheep (Ovis aries) as intermediate hosts, have been characterized most comprehensively [3]. The first two species (S. arieticanis and S. tenella) form microcysts in muscle tissues and are transmitted by canids, whereas S. gigantea and S. medusiformis produce macrocysts and are transmitted by felids [4]. Other species described in sheep are rare; S. microps [5] and S. mihoensis [6] were reported in China and Japan, respectively. Based on transmission experiments, dogs were found to act as definitive hosts for these two poorly investigated species [5,6]. However, a later phylogenetic study demonstrated that S. mihoensis-like presumably use corvids and other scavenger birds as definitive hosts [7]. Furthermore, S. gracilis-like sarcocysts were found in single sheep from Italy [8].
In most cases, Sarcocystis spp. are non-pathogenic for sheep [9]. However, acute S. arieticanis and S. tenella infections can lead to fever, loss of appetite, anaemia, and abortion or the premature birth of lambs [10]. Furthermore, contamination of sheep carcasses with macroscopic sarcocysts results in significant losses in the animal husbandry industry [11]. Therefore, it is important to conduct and develop epidemiological studies on Sarcocystis spp. In sheep.
Thus far, five Sarcocystis species from sheep, S. arieticanis, S. gigantea, S. medusiformis, S. mihoensis, and S. tenella, have been investigated by means of genetic methods. It was shown that the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (cox1) was the best choice for the discrimination of these Sarcocystis species [7]. Sarcocystis species from sheep are usually identified by sequencing [3,4,7,9,10,12,13,14,15,16]. By contrast, in some studies Sarcocystis species from sheep have been confirmed by PCR-RFLP [17,18].
It was shown that as compared to morphological methods, molecular approaches were superior in detecting Sarcocystis species [19]. Typically, Sarcocystis species were identified by isolating sarcocysts from muscles and characterizing them genetically [7]. However, isolation of sarcocysts is ineffective in large-scale epidemiological studies [20]. By contrast, muscle digestion combined with PCR assays may be a rapid and accurate technique for detecting Sarcocystis species [21].
In Lithuania, such farm animals as sheep, cattle, pigs, and horses were examined by morphological methods for Sarcocystis occurrence. The highest Sarcocystis infection prevalence and intensity were determined in sheep [2]. In Lithuania, Sarcocystis species were previously identified only in cattle, revealing the presence of four species, including zoonotic S. hominis [20]. The aim of the present study was to identity Sarcocystis species in sheep from Lithuania by means of combined digestion and molecular methods and to compare the distribution of Sarcocystis species detected in diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart samples.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Tissue samples were collected from 69 sheep immediately after the slaughter process. In total, 190 muscle tissue samples from the diaphragms, oesophaguses, and hearts of sheep were collected. Whole organs were collected for the detection of Sarcocystis spp. Diaphragm and oesophagus samples were collected from 17 sheep, while diaphragm, oesophagus and heart samples were taken from 52 animals. The examined animals were raised in north-eastern Lithuania (54–55° N, 24–26° W) and were collected from a slaughterhouse in the village of Alanta, Molėtai district, during the period lasting from October 2019 to October 2020. The ages of the inspected animals were determined by registration numbers in the Government system. Forty sheep were under a year old, while six sheep were from one to two years old, eight sheep were three years old, and 15 sheep were older than three years.

2.2. Microscopic Examination of Sarcocysts

All tissue samples were transported to the Nature Research Centre, the Laboratory of Molecular Ecology (Vilnius, Lithuania), and were kept frozen (–20 °C) until a microscopical and digestion examination was conducted. A visual inspection of the collected sheep tissues for macroscopic sarcocysts of Sarcocystis spp. was repeatedly carried out at the laboratory. Afterwards, sarcocysts were examined in freshly squashed muscle samples under the Nikon ECLIPSE 80 i light microscope (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Overall, 70 sarcocysts were isolated from the muscle fibres of the diaphragm and oesophagus with the help of two preparation needles. These sarcocysts were morphologically characterised according to the size and shape of the cysts, the structure of the sarcocyst wall, and the size of bradyzoites located inside the cyst. The morphology of bradyzoites was inspected by gently pressing the cover slip, rupturing the sarcocyst wall, and releasing bradyzoites. Eleven sarcocysts isolated from the diaphragm and nine sarcocysts isolated from the oesophagus were preserved in individual 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes containing 50 μL 96% ethanol and kept frozen at −20 °C for a further molecular characterisation.

2.3. Molecular and Phylogenetic Analysis of Sarcocysts

For the identification of Sarcocystis species and evaluation of intraspecific genetic variability, isolated sarcocysts of two morphological types, twelve sarcocysts having finger-like protrusions, and eight sarcocysts characterised by hair-like protrusions were subjected to molecular examination. DNA extraction of twenty sarcocysts (C2.2, C5.2, C14.1, C14.2, C28.1, C28.2, C34.2, C40.2, C55.1, C57.1, and C57.2 extracted from diaphragm samples, and C2.1, C5.1, C10.1, C10.2, C18.1, C18.2, C34.1, C40.1, and C55.2 extracted from oesophagus samples) isolated from ten sheep individuals was performed using a GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The final DNA concentration in the solutions was measured with a spectrophotometer after the DNA extraction. DNA concentrations in samples reached up to 15 ng/μL.
Obtained DNA samples were later used for the PCR amplification of cox1 sequences. Partial cox1 sequences were amplified using the SF1/SsunR3 primer pair listed in Table 1. Amplification was carried out in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 12.5 μL of DreamTaq PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania), 5 μL of DNA template, 0.5 μM of both forward and reverse primers, and nuclease-free water up to 25 μL. The PCR cycling conditions started with 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 60 s at 60 °C, and 80 s at 72 °C, and ended with 10 min at 72 °C. The evaluation of PCR products was made using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and 5 μL of each PCR product was purified with alkaline phosphatase FastAP and exonuclease ExoI (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania) to remove unincorporated nucleotides and primers.
Purified PCR samples were sequenced using a Big-Dye®Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) and a 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed in both directions using the same forward and reverse primers as for PCR. Sequencing results were validated by comparing the obtained sequences with those of various Sarcocystis spp. by Nucleotide BLAST search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 6 June 2022).
Phylogenetic analysis was conducted to evaluate the intraspecific genetic relatedness of identified Sarcocystis species by comparison of isolates of the same species obtained from different intermediate hosts and various countries. Sequences for the analysis were chosen based on previous phylogenetic studies [7,22] and the results of the Nucleotide BLAST comparison. Sequences exported from the GenBank database were aligned with those obtained in the current study. Multiple sequence alignments were generated with the MUSCLE algorithm available in MEGA7 software [23]. MEGA7 was used to select a nucleotide substitution model and to construct phylogenetic trees using the maximum likelihood method. The bootstrap method with 1000 bootstrap replications was used to test the robustness of the phylogeny.

2.4. Peptic Digestion

All 190 muscle samples were used for Sarcocystis species identification by combined peptic digestion and the nested PCR (nPCR) technique. During the preparation of each sample, several pieces of muscle were cut off from different parts of the organ. Then, 25 ± 3 g of each muscle sample was minced and subjected to peptic digestion according to a modification of the protocol for isolating Toxoplasma gondii from animal tissues for the isolation of Sarcocystis [26]. Minced samples were blended with 150 mL of saline. Afterwards, 150 mL of acid pepsin solution containing 1.04 g pepsin, 2 g NaCl, and 7 mL HCl (pH 1.10–1.20) was prewarmed (37 °C) and added to the homogenate. The suspensions were placed in an orbital shaking incubator for 2 h at 37 °C and were later filtered into individual flasks using a strainer. Collected filtrates were then transferred to sterile centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 1200× g for 8 min. The supernatant was poured off and the procedure was repeated until there was no residual liquid left. After removing the supernatant, an additional 50 mL of saline was added, and the solution was centrifuged at 1200× g for 8 min. Fluid from the sediment was poured off and the samples were stored at −4 °C until genomic DNA extraction.

2.5. Molecular Analysis of Digested Samples

Genomic DNA from the digested samples was extracted using a PureLink Microbiome DNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After peptic digestion and DNA extraction, the concentration of the resulting DNA was measured. The final DNA concentration ranged from 19.1 to 83.4 ng/μL. Some samples were diluted with elution buffer so that the final DNA concentration did not exceed 40 ng/μL. In order to identify Sarcocystis species, all isolates were used for species-specific PCR amplification with the PCR primers listed in Table 1. Primers were designed with the help of the Primer 3 plus program [27].
The first amplification step of nPCR was performed under the same conditions as are used in conventional PCR. The second amplification step was carried out in 25 μL reaction mixture containing 12.5 μL of DreamTaq PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius, Lithuania), 2 μL of DNA template, 0.5 μM of both forward and reverse internal primers, and nuclease-free water up to 25 μL. Cycling conditions for the first amplification step were the same as those described above, except for the 56–60 °C annealing temperatures used, depending on the primer pair. The second nPCR amplification cycling conditions started with 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 59–62 °C, and 60 s at 72 °C, and ended with 7 min at 72 °C. The annealing temperatures used depended on the primer pair. A total of three negative controls were used: one for the first amplification step and two for the second amplification step. The second negative control for the second amplification step was obtained by transferring 2 μL from the negative control of the first amplification step to the negative control of the second amplification step. Positive DNA controls were obtained in the present study by isolating sarcocysts of S. arieticanis and S. tenella. However, positive DNA controls for S. gigantea, S. medusiformis, and S. mihoensis were not obtained. Amplified PCR products were visualized by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.
The PCR purification and sequencing procedures used were the same as those described above. Despite the fact that, in some cases, not only products of the second nPCR step but also longer products of the first amplification step were visible in agarose gels, the chromatograms were pure without double peaks. The sequences obtained were compared using the BLAST program. For the BLAST analysis, ≥90% query coverage was set. In the present study, generated cox1 sequences of Sarcocystis species from sheep were deposited in GenBank with the accession numbers ON858956–ON859017.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology of Sarcocysts as Observed under a Light Microscope

During the initial examination of the muscle samples with the naked eye, no macrocysts were observed either while collecting them at the slaughterhouse or while re-testing them at the laboratory. By contrast, two types of microcysts corresponding to S. arieticanis and S. tenella were observed under the light microscope.
In the diaphragm and oesophagus samples, sarcocysts of S. arieticanis were ribbon-shaped, measuring 470–1693 × 75–130 μm (999 ± 316 × 92 ± 13 μm; n = 30) in size (Figure 1a). The sarcocyst walls had numerous thin irregularly arranged hair-like protrusions, which were 4.2–7.3 μm (5.8 ± 0.8 μm; n = 30) in length (Figure 1b). During manipulation of the sarcocysts, the fragile hair-like protrusions were torn in some cases. Cysts were septate, and their interior compartments were filled with banana-shaped bradyzoites measuring 9.5–14.0 × 2.5–4.8 μm (11.7 ± 1.1 × 3.3 ± 0.4 μm; n =150) in size.
In the diaphragm and oesophagus samples, sarcocysts of S. tenella were spindle-shaped, measuring 350–1350 × 28–130 μm (705 ± 235 × 70 ± 24 μm; n = 40) (Figure 1c). The sarcocyst walls were 2.0–4.5 μm (3.1 ± 0.6 μm; n = 40) in thickness and had numerous very densely packed finger-like protrusions (Figure 1d). The interiors of the sarcocysts were filled with banana-shaped bradyzoites that measured 9.5–14.7 × 2.9–5.2 μm (12.7 ± 1.3 × 3.8 ± 0.5 μm; n = 250).

3.2. Molecular and Phylogenetic Analysis of Isolated Sarcocysts

A standard PCR using the SF1/SSunR3 primer pair and subsequent sequencing was successful for 20 sarcocysts analysed. Twelve of the isolated sarcocysts were assigned to S. tenella and the remaining eight were attributed to S. arieticanis. The 894 bp-long cox1 sequences of S. arieticanis showed 99.11–100% similarity to each other, differing by up to eight single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), whereas a comparison of the 894 bp-long cox1 sequences of S. tenella demonstrated 98.66–100% similarity to each other and up to 12 SNPs. Eight S. arieticanis sequences comprised 5 haplotypes, while 12 S. tenella sequences were divided into 11 haplotypes.
In the present study, the obtained sequences of S. arieticanis displayed a high similarity (98.77–99.78%) to three sequences of S. arieticanis from domestic sheep in Spain and China (Table 2). By contrast, only 92.39–93.85% sequence similarity was observed when comparing sequences obtained in this work with two Egyptian isolates (MH413047–MH413048). In the phylogram, eight isolates of S. arieticanis obtained in the current study were placed together with S. arieticanis isolates from domestic sheep in Spain and formed a sister branch to Chinese and Egyptian isolates of S. arieticanis (Figure 2). The phylogenetic analysis revealed that S. arieticanis was a sister species to S. hircicanis from domestic goats.
The analysis of intraspecific genetic variability of S. tenella showed that genetic differences within cox1 did not depend on the intermediate host of the parasite (Table 2 and Figure 3). High sequence similarity values (97.32–99.89%) were obtained by comparing S. tenella isolates from Lithuanian domestic sheep with those from domestic sheep, European mouflon (Ovis aries musimon), Tatra chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra tatrica), Barbary sheep (Ammotragus lervia), and argali (Ovis ammon) from Austria, Poland, Spain, Norway, China, and India (Table 2). Meanwhile 95.86–97.54% sequence similarity was determined by comparing S. tenella from Lithuanian domestic sheep with S. tenella from domestic sheep in Egypt. In the phylogenetic tree, 95 out of 99 sequences of S. tenella were grouped into a cluster with high support (95 bootstrap value). This cluster consisted of S. tenella isolates obtained from various intermediate hosts, argali, barbary sheep, domestic sheep, mouflon, and Tatra chamois. In the present study, the analysed S. tenella isolates from Lithuania were also placed in this clade. Four remaining S. tenella sequences were acquired from Chinese and Egyptian domestic sheep. Based on partial cox1 sequences, S. tenella was separated from the most closely related S. capracanis, which used the domestic goat as intermediate host.

3.3. Identification of Sarcocystis spp. in Sheep from Lithuania by nPCR

Using primers designed for the identification of S. tenella and S. arieticanis, fragments corresponding to the theoretical sizes were successfully amplified. The use of DNA controls derived from sarcocysts proved that the primer pairs V2arie3/V2arie4 and V3tenF3/V3tenR2 were specific to S. arieticanis and S. tenella, respectively. By contrast, no amplification was obtained with primers theoretically targeting S. gigantea, S. medusiformis, and S. mihoensis.
Further sequencing was employed to verify that S. tenella and S. arieticanis species could be identified from the resulting fragments. In this way, 21 amplified fragments for each species, with 7 fragments from the diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart, were randomly selected and subject to sequencing. The obtained sequences were trimmed, excluding the primer binding sites. Thus, 325 bp-long S. arieticanis (corresponding to 430–754 sites in S. tenella MK420009) and 338 bp-long S. tenella (corresponding to 532–869 sites in S. tenella MK420009) sequences were analysed. It should be concluded that S. arieticanis and S. tenella can be reliably identified by the technique described in the present study, as the obtained intraspecific and interspecific genetic similarity values did not overlap (Table 3). The sequence comparison showed that the barcoding gap was wider for S. tenella than for S. arieticanis.

3.4. Distribution of Sarcocystis spp. in the Examined Sheep Samples from Lithuania

By digestion and nPCR, 100% infection prevalence for S. arieticanis and S. tenella was observed in the 69 animals studied. The maximum Sarcocystis spp. prevalence was detected in the diaphragm and heart, while a 97.10% infection rate was determined in the oesophagus (Table 4). In general, the prevalence of S. arieticanis and S. tenella in the analysed muscles ranged from 82.61% to 100%. Comparing the detection rate of two Sarcocystis species, S. tenella was more frequently found in the diaphragm and heart, and S. arieticanis was more common in the oesophagus; however, the differences observed were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). The occurrence of S. tenella differed significantly between the three muscle types analysed (χ2 = 14.80, df = 2, p < 0.01). The differences were due to a significantly higher (χ2 = 13.14, df = 1, p < 0.001) prevalence of S. tenella in the diaphragm (100%) than in the oesophagus (82.61%). By contrast, the detection rate of S. arieticanis in the examined muscle types did not differ significantly (χ2 = 1.28, df = 2, p = 0.575). Mixed infections with S. arieticanis and S. tenella were significantly more frequently (χ2 = 8.42, df = 1, p < 0.01) observed in the diaphragm (94.20%) than in the oesophagus (76.81%), whereas in the heart, mixed infections occurred in 82.69% of cases. Observed differences in Sarcocystis species prevalence were not significant (χ2 ≤ 1.95, df = 2, p ≥ 0.163) in two analysed age groups of sheep (younger than two years and older than two years). In conclusion, a very high infection prevalence of both identified species, S. arieticanis and S. tenella, was established in the diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart muscles of sheep raised in Lithuania.

4. Discussion

4.1. Prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. in Sheep

Previously, in Lithuania, based on methylene-blue staining of squashed muscle samples of 61 studied domestic sheep, 100% Sarcocystis spp. prevalence was detected in oesophagus, diaphragm, heart, jaw, neck, and back muscle samples [2]. On the basis of a molecular analysis, the present study revealed 100% Sarcocystis spp. prevalence in the diaphragm (69/69) and heart (52/52) and a 97.10% infection rate (67/69) in the oesophagus. Across the globe, Sarcocystis spp. prevalence rates in sheep vary from 9.0 to 100%, depending on the method used [1]. In the current work, S. arieticanis and S. tenella producing microscopic sarcocysts were identified in all 69 examined animals. In general, the detection rates of microscopic S. arieticanis and S. tenella is higher as compared to the observation of macrocysts of Sarcocystis spp. worldwide [9,10,30]. For instance, some recent studies described occurrence rates of microscopic Sarcocystis spp. greater than 70% in sheep from Brazil [12], China [4], Egypt [14], Iran [16,31,32], Iraq [33,34], and Malaysia [35], whereas the highest prevalence of macroscopic Sarcocystis spp. in sheep was reported in Iran, reaching up to 37% [16,17,32,36,37]. Sarcocystis gigantea is assumed to be a more frequent macroscopic species as compared to S. medusiformis [17,18,38].

4.2. Canids Serve as Definitive Hosts of Sarcocystis spp. in Sheep from Lithuania

In the present study, the Sarcocystis species S. tenella and S. arieticanis, transmitted by canids, were detected. These species are known to be more pathogenic as compared to other Sarcocystis species found in sheep which are transmitted via felids [7,10,13,14,15,16]. Non-detection of macrocysts in sheep was an expected outcome of the current study, since local slaughterhouse veterinarians note that macrocysts in sheep are rare, occurring every few years (personal communication with veterinarian Rimas Rudėnas). High prevalence rates of S. tenella and S. arieticanis can be explained by the fact that sheep farmers keep dogs to protect their herds. As a result, farmed sheep can freely interact with the faeces of canids [1]. The defecation behaviour of dogs may only facilitate the spread of Sarcocystis spp. sporocysts, which leads to infection. On the other hand, the limiting factor of exposure to feline faeces is that cats tend to bury their excrement [38,39]. Furthermore, macroscopic cysts of S. gigantea and S. medusiformis tend to require longer time periods (from 1 to 2 years) to grow and fully develop [39,40,41]. Although we investigated 23 adult (over 2 years) individuals, no macroscopic cysts were found.

4.3. Genetic Characterisation of Sarcocystis spp. in Sheep

Nuclear 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, ITS1, and mitochondrial cox1 have been examined in Sarcocystis spp. from sheep, and the latter gene has been demonstrated to be most appropriate for species identification [4,7]. Thus far, numerous cox1 sequences of S. tenella have been available from Austria, China, Egypt, India, Norway, Poland, and Spain [3,4,7,9,14,24,25,28,29]. By contrast, only six cox1 sequences of S. arieticanis from domestic sheep in China, Egypt, and Spain [4,7,14] and from the European mouflon in Austria [25] could be found in GenBank. Here, we obtained twelve and eight 894 bp-long cox1 sequences of S. tenella and S. arieticanis from sheep in Lithuania, respectively. Additionally, relatively high intraspecific variation within cox1 of these two Sarcocystis species was demonstrated (Table 2, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Hence, the accumulation of cox1 sequences of S. arieticanis and S. tenella, representing isolates from different geographical regions and hosts, is important for the development of species identification techniques which could be applied globally.

4.4. Distribution of Sarcocystis Species in Different Muscles of Sheep

In the current work, Sarcocystis species were identified by peptic digestion combined with nPCR. Sarcocystis arieticanis detection rates in the diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart were 94.20%, 91.30%, and 88.46%, respectively, whereas S. tenella was identified in all diaphragm samples examined, in 94.23% of the heart samples, and in 82.61% of the oesophagus samples. Significant differences were noticed in comparing the detection rates of S. tenella in the diaphragm and oesophagus (χ2 = 13.14, df = 1, p < 0.001). It should be noted that data on the prevalence of the following Sarcocystis species in various muscles are scarce. According to Metwally et al. (2019) [15], S. tenella was more frequent in the diaphragm (62/91, 68.13%) and heart (45/91, 49.45%) as compared to the oesophagus (24/91, 26.37%) and tongue (22/91, 24.18%) in domestic sheep raised in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of Sarcocystis was determined by peptic digestion and Giemsa staining. When analysing the diaphragm, heart, oesophagus, and tongue muscle samples of sheep from China, Hu et al. (2017) [4] identified the highest infection rates of S. tenella and S. arieticanis in the oesophagus, at 84.88% (73/86) and 51.16% (44/86), respectively. The examination of diaphragm, heart, oesophagus, and tongue muscle samples from 175 sheep from Egypt [14] showed the highest prevalence of S. tenella and S. arieticanis in the oesophagus (62.29% and 48.00%) and diaphragm (33.71% and 24.00%). Interestingly, in two reports, no microcysts of S. arieticanis were identified in the heart of domestic sheep [4,14]. The prevalence of S. tenella and S. arieticanis was established in these two studies by a microscopic analysis of 0.5 mm pieces of muscle squeezed between two glass slides. In summary, further molecular studies on the prevalence of S. tenella and S. arieticanis in various geographical regions are necessary to identify the distribution of these Sarcocystis species in different organs.

5. Conclusions

Based on digestion, nPCR, and subsequent sequencing, the presence of two Sarcocystis species, S. arieticanis and S. tenella, was confirmed in diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart muscle samples of sheep raised in Lithuania. This is the first identification of Sarcocystis species in sheep from Lithuania. Both detected species are transmitted by canids. Furthermore, twenty sarcocysts were excised from muscle tissues and characterised at cox1. The sequence comparison showed relatively high intraspecific genetic variation; thus, for the identification of S. arieticanis and S. tenella, it is important to accumulate cox1 sequences of these two species originating from different geographical areas and hosts.
The detection rates of S. arieticanis and S. tenella in diaphragm, oesophagus, and heart samples varied from 82.61% to 100%. Significant differences were observed among the frequencies of detection of S. tenella in the three muscle types analysed (χ2 = 14.80, df = 2, p < 0.01), whereas such differences were not established in the case of S. arieticanis2 = 1.28, df = 2, p = 0.575). Microscopical studies conducted in Saudi Arabia, China, and Egypt also reported considerable differences in the prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. in different organs [4,14,15]. The reasons for the uneven distribution of Sarcocystis species in different muscle types of sheep have yet to revealed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B. and P.P.; methodology, A.M.-P. and P.P.; software, N.G. and P.P.; validation, A.M.-P., D.B. and P.P.; formal analysis, A.M.-P., N.G. and P.P.; investigation, A.M.-P., N.G., E.J.-N., V.J. and E.R.-L.; resources, D.B., V.J. and P.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.-P., N.G., E.J.-N. and P.P.; writing—review and editing, A.M.-P., D.B., N.G., E.J.-N., V.J., E.R.-L. and P.P.; visualization, E.J.-N. and P.P.; supervision, D.B.; funding acquisition, A.M.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the European Social Fund under the no. 09.3.3-LMT-K-712 “Development of Competences of Scientists, other Researchers and Students through Practical Research Activities” measure under a grant agreement with the Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT). Postdoc no.: 09.3.3-LMT-K-712-23-0064.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The pre- and post-slaughter examinations of sheep were performed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 854/2004 for the slaughterhouses of meat production companies.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The cox1 sequences of S. arieticanis and S. tenella were submitted to the GenBank database under the accession numbers ON858956–ON859017.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to G. Januškevičienė for her help in organizing the collection of sheep muscle samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dubey, J.P.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Rosenthal, B.M.; Speer, C.A.; Fayer, R. Sarcocystosis of Animals and Humans, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Januškevičius, V.; Januškevičienė, G.; Prakas, P.; Butkauskas, D.; Petkevičius, S. Prevalence and Intensity of Sarcocystis spp. Infection in Animals Slaughtered for Food in Lithuania. Vet. Med. Czech 2019, 64, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sudan, V.; Kumar, R.; Shanker, D.; Paliwal, S. First Report of Molecular Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of Sarcocystis tenella from India. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1429–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hu, J.J.; Huang, S.; Wen, T.; Esch, G.W.; Liang, Y.; Li, H.L. Sarcocystis spp. in Domestic Sheep in Kunming City, China: Prevalence, Morphology, and Molecular Characteristics. Parasite 2017, 24, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, G.; Wei, T.; Wang, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, P.; Dong, M.; Xiao, H. The Morphology and Life Cycle of Sarcocystis microps n. sp. in Sheep of Qinghai in China. China Vet. Technol. 1988, 6, 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  6. Saito, M.; Shibata, Y.; Kubo, M.; Itagaki, H. Sarcocystis mihoensis n. sp. from Sheep in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1997, 59, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gjerde, B.; de la Fuente, C.; Alunda, J.M.; Luzón, M. Molecular Characterisation of Five Sarcocystis Species in Domestic Sheep (Ovis aries) from Spain. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 215–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Giannetto, S.; Poglayen, G.; Brianti, E.; Gaglio, G.; Scala, A. Sarcocystis gracilis-like Sarcocysts in a Sheep. Vet. Rec. 2005, 156, 322–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dong, H.; Su, R.; Wang, Y.; Tong, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Hu, J. Sarcocystis Species in Wild and Domestic Sheep (Ovis ammon and Ovis aries) from China. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dessì, G.; Tamponi, C.; Pasini, C.; Porcu, F.; Meloni, L.; Cavallo, L.; Sini, M.F.; Knoll, S.; Scala, A.; Varcasia, A. A Survey on Apicomplexa Protozoa in Sheep Slaughtered for Human Consumption. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 1437–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martínez-Navalón, B.; Anastasio-Giner, B.; Cano-Fructuoso, M.; Sanchez-Martínez, P.; Llopis-Morant, A.; Perez-Castarlenas, B.; Goyena, E.; de Larrea, E.B. Sarcocystis Infection: A Major Cause of Carcass Condemnation in Adult Sheep in Spain. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2021, 10, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bittencourt, M.V.; Meneses, I.D.; Ribeiro-Andrade, M.; de Jesus, R.F.; de Araújo, F.R.; Gondim, L.F. Sarcocystis spp. in Sheep and Goats: Frequency of Infection and Species Identification by Morphological, Ultrastructural, and Molecular Tests in Bahia, Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 1683–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Amairia, S.; Amdouni, Y.; Rouatbi, M.; Rjeibi, R.M.; Awadi, S.; Gharbi, M. First Detection and Molecular Identification of Sarcocystis spp. in Small Ruminants in North-West Tunisia. Meat. Sci. 2017, 122, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. El-Morsey, A.; Abdo, W.; Sultan, K.; Elhawary, N.M.; AbouZaid, A.A. Ultrastructural and Molecular Identification of the Sarcocysts of Sarcocystis tenella and Sarcocystis arieticanis Infecting Domestic Sheep (Ovis aries) from Egypt. Acta Parasit. 2019, 64, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Metwally, D.M.; Al-Damigh, M.A.; Al-Turaiki, I.M.; El-Khadragy, M.F. Molecular Characterization of Sarcocystis Species Isolated from Sheep and Goats in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Animals 2019, 9, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salehi, M.; Spotin, A.; Rostamian, M.; Adami, M. Prevalence and Molecular Assessment of Sarcocystis Infection in Livestock in Northeast Iran. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2022, 80, 101738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farhang-Pajuh, F.; Yakhchali, M.; Mardani, K. Molecular Determination of Abundance of Infection with Sarcocystis Species in Slaughtered Sheep of Urmia, Iran. Vet. Res. Forum 2014, 5, 181–186. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamidinejat, H.; Moetamedi, H.; Alborzi, A.; Hatami, A. Molecular Detection of Sarcocystis Species in Slaughtered Sheep by PCR-RFLP from South-western of Iran. J. Parasit. Dis. 2014, 38, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rubiola, S.; Civera, T.; Panebianco, F.; Vercellino, D.; Chiesa, F. Molecular Detection of Cattle Sarcocystis spp. in North-West Italy Highlights their Association with Bovine Eosinophilic Myositis. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Prakas, P.; Strazdaitė-Žielienė, Ž.; Januškevičius, V.; Chiesa, F.; Baranauskaitė, A.; Rudaitytė-Lukošienė, E.; Servienė, E.; Petkevičius, S.; Butkauskas, D. Molecular Identification of Four Sarcocystis species in Cattle from Lithuania, Including S. hominis, and Development of a Rapid Molecular Detection Method. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Calero-Bernal, R.; Verma, S.K.; Oliveira, S.; Yang, Y.; Rosenthal, B.M.; Dubey, J.P. In the United States, Negligible Rates of Zoonotic Sarcocystosis Occur in Feral Swine that, by Contrast, Frequently Harbour Infections with Sarcocystis miescheriana, a Related Parasite Contracted from Canids. Parasitology 2015, 142, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sudan, V.; Shanker, D.; Paliwal, S.; Kumar, R.; Singh, A. Phylogenetics of Sarcocystis fusiformis Isolates Based on 18S rRNA and cox 1 Genes. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 159, 105144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gjerde, B. Phylogenetic Relationships among Sarcocystis Species in Cervids, Cattle and Sheep Inferred from the Mitochondrial Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I Gene. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prakas, P.; Rehbein, S.; Rudaitytė-Lukošienė, E.; Butkauskas, D. Molecular Identification of Sarcocystis species in Diaphragm Muscle Tissue of European mouflon (Ovis gmelini musimon) from Austria. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 2695–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dubey, J.P. Refinement of Pepsin Digestion Method for Isolation of Toxoplasma gondii from Infected Tissues. Vet. Parasitol. 1998, 74, 75–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3-new Capabilities and Interfaces. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kolenda, R.; Schierack, P.; Zieba, F.; Zwijacz-Kozica, T.; Bednarski, M. First Molecular Characterization of Sarcocystis tenella in Tatra Chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra tatrica) in Poland. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 3885–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Delgado-de Las Cuevas, G.E.; Prakas, P.; Rudaitytė-Lukošienė, E.; García-Gil, M.L.; Martínez-González, M.; Butkauskas, D.; Mowery, J.D.; Dubey, J.P.; Habela, M.A.; Calero-Bernal, R. First Description of Sarcocystis Species Infecting Barbary sheep (Ammotragus lervia). Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 2881–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Minuzzi, C.E.; Cezar, A.S.; Bräunig, P.; Portella, L.P.; Rodrigues, F.S.; Sangioni, L.A.; Vogel, F.S.F. Occurrence of Sarcocystis gigantea Macrocysts and High Frequency of S. tenella Microcysts in Sheep from Southern Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2019, 15, 100256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rassouli, M.; Ahmadpanahi, J.; Alvandi, A. Prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. and Hammondia spp. Microcysts in Esophagus Tissue of Sheep and Cattle, Emphasized on their Morphological Differences. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 3801–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mirzaei, M.; Rezaei, H. The Role of Sheep in the Epidemiology of Sarcocystis spp. in Tabriz Area Northwest of Iran. J. Parasit. Dis. 2016, 40, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zangana, I.K.; Hussein, S.N. Prevalence of Sarcocystis Species (Sarcocystis ovicanis and Sarcocystis capricanis) in Tongue Muscle of Sheep and Goats in Duhok Province, Kurdistan Region, North Iraq. ARO 2017, 5, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdullah, S.H. Investigation of Sarcocystis spp. in Slaughtered Cattle and Sheep by Peptic Digestion and Histological Examination in Sulaimani Province, Iraq. Vet. World 2021, 14, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Latif, B.; Kannan Kutty, M.; Muslim, A.; Hussaini, J.; Omar, E.; Heo, C.C.; Rossle, N.F.; Abdullah, S.; Kamarudin, M.A.; Zulkarnain, M.A. Light Microscopy and Molecular Identification of Sarcocystis spp. in Meat Producing Animals in Selangor, Malaysia. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 32, 444–452. [Google Scholar]
  36. Daryani, A.; Alaei, R.; Dehghan, M.H.; Arab, R.; Sharif, M.; Ziaei, H. Survey of Sarcocystis Infection in Slaughtered Sheep and Buffaloes in Ardabil, Iran. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2006, 5, 60–62. [Google Scholar]
  37. Dehaghi, M.M.; Fallahi, M.; Sami, M.; Radfar, M.H. Survey of Sarcocystis Infection in Slaughtered Sheep in Kerman Abattoir, Kerman, Iran. Comp. Clin. Path. 2013, 22, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. El-Morsey, A.; Abdo, W.; Zaid, A.A.; Sorour, S.S. Morphologic and Molecular Identification of Three Macroscopic Sarcocystis Species Infecting Domestic Sheep (Ovis aries) and Cattle (Bos taurus) in Egypt. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 637–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Smith, A.F.; Semeniuk, C.A.; Kutz, S.J.; Massolo, A. Dog-walking Behaviours Affect Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Park-attending Dogs. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Munday, B.L.; Obendorf, D.L. Morphology of Sarcocystis gigantea in Experimentally Infected Sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 1984, 15, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Obendorf, D.L.; Munday, B.L. Experimental Infection with Sarcocystis medusiformis in Sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 1987, 24, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphologies of S. arieticanis and S. tenella isolated from the diaphragm of sheep as observed under a light microscope. Fresh preparations: (a,b) S. arieticanis; (c,d) S. tenella. (a) Fragment of ribbon-shaped sarcocyst incorporated in muscle tissues. (b) A portion of sarcocyst wall with irregularly arranged hair-like protrusions. (c) A spindle-shaped sarcocyst released from muscle tissues. (d) A portion of sarcocyst wall with densely packed finger-like protrusions.
Figure 1. Morphologies of S. arieticanis and S. tenella isolated from the diaphragm of sheep as observed under a light microscope. Fresh preparations: (a,b) S. arieticanis; (c,d) S. tenella. (a) Fragment of ribbon-shaped sarcocyst incorporated in muscle tissues. (b) A portion of sarcocyst wall with irregularly arranged hair-like protrusions. (c) A spindle-shaped sarcocyst released from muscle tissues. (d) A portion of sarcocyst wall with densely packed finger-like protrusions.
Animals 12 02048 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of selected Sarcocystis spp. based on cox1 sequences showing genetic relatedness of isolated sarcocysts to S. arieticanis. The tree was rooted on S. grueneri. The figures next to the branches show the bootstrap support values. Sequences obtained in the present study are marked in blue. The final alignment consisted of 3 taxa, 16 sequences, and 894 aligned nucleotide positions. The Kimura 2-parameter + G model was chosen for the phylogenetic analysis. CHN: China, EGY: Egypt, ESP: Spain, LTU: Lithuania, NOR: Norway, Ch: Capra hircus, Oar: Ovis aries, Rt: Rangifer tarandus.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of selected Sarcocystis spp. based on cox1 sequences showing genetic relatedness of isolated sarcocysts to S. arieticanis. The tree was rooted on S. grueneri. The figures next to the branches show the bootstrap support values. Sequences obtained in the present study are marked in blue. The final alignment consisted of 3 taxa, 16 sequences, and 894 aligned nucleotide positions. The Kimura 2-parameter + G model was chosen for the phylogenetic analysis. CHN: China, EGY: Egypt, ESP: Spain, LTU: Lithuania, NOR: Norway, Ch: Capra hircus, Oar: Ovis aries, Rt: Rangifer tarandus.
Animals 12 02048 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees of selected Sarcocystis spp. based on cox1 sequences showing the genetic relatedness of isolated sarcocysts to S. tenella. The tree was rooted on S. heydorni. The figures next to the branches show the bootstrap support values. Sequences obtained in the present study are marked in blue. The final alignment consisted of 3 taxa, 122 sequences, and 863 aligned nucleotide positions. The Kimura 2-parameter + G + I model was chosen for the phylogenetic analysis. AUT: Austria, CHN: China, EGY: Egypt, ESP: Spain, IND: India, LTU: Lithuania, NOR: Norway, POL: Poland, Al: Ammotragus lervia, Bt: Bos taurus, Oar: Ovis aries, Oarm: Ovis aries musimon, Oam: Ovis ammon, Rrt: Rupicapra rupicapra tatrica, n: number of sequences.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees of selected Sarcocystis spp. based on cox1 sequences showing the genetic relatedness of isolated sarcocysts to S. tenella. The tree was rooted on S. heydorni. The figures next to the branches show the bootstrap support values. Sequences obtained in the present study are marked in blue. The final alignment consisted of 3 taxa, 122 sequences, and 863 aligned nucleotide positions. The Kimura 2-parameter + G + I model was chosen for the phylogenetic analysis. AUT: Austria, CHN: China, EGY: Egypt, ESP: Spain, IND: India, LTU: Lithuania, NOR: Norway, POL: Poland, Al: Ammotragus lervia, Bt: Bos taurus, Oar: Ovis aries, Oarm: Ovis aries musimon, Oam: Ovis ammon, Rrt: Rupicapra rupicapra tatrica, n: number of sequences.
Animals 12 02048 g003
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used to amplify the cox1 region of Sarcocystis spp. from domestic sheep.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used to amplify the cox1 region of Sarcocystis spp. from domestic sheep.
Sarcocystis SpeciesPrimer NameOrientationPrimer SequenceTa, °CLength of PCR Product, bp
S. arieticanisSF1 1ForwardATGGCGTACAACAATCATAAAGAA53913
SsunR3 PSReverseCCGTTGGWATGGCRATCAT
V2arie3 PSForwardTAGTTCTTGGCCTGGCTATTCTT60371
V2arie4 PSReverseCTGACCTCCAAAAACTGGCTTAC
S. giganteaV2gig1 PSForwardGCACTTCGAGCATTCTTGG57548
V2gig2 2ReverseATCTACATCCACCGTAGGAACCTTA
V2gig3 2ForwardCAGCAAGTACCAAGTTCTGTACGTC62322
V2gig4 PSReverseGGTGCCGAGTACCGAGATACAT
S. medusiformisV2medu1 PSForwardTTAATGGCATATCGTACTACCTATTG56729
V2medu2 PSReverseCCCATGCATCAACCTCCAG
V2medu3 PSForwardGTATCCTGGGGGCCATTAACTT61389
V2medu4 PSReverseCCAAACCAGTGTTCCGAGTATTG
S. mihoensisV2miho1 PSForwardATCTTTACACTGCACGGTTTGTTT60844
V2miho2 PSReverseAGTCGTTATGTCGGAAGTCAACAG
V2miho3 PSForwardGATGTTACCTCGGGTAAATGCTCTT60526
V2miho4 PSReverseAAAAACATGTCTAGCTCCTAACACC
S. tenellaSF1 1ForwardATGGCGTACAACAATCATAAAGAA53913
SsunR3 PSReverseCCGTTGGWATGGCRATCAT
V3tenF3 PSForwardACGCTATTTACCTGGGCAATC59381
V3tenR2 PSReverseTAGTCACGGCAGAGAAGTAGGAC
1 Ref. [24]. 2 Ref. [25]. PS Present study. Ta primer annealing temperature.
Table 2. Intraspecific genetic variation of S. arieticanis and S. tenella.
Table 2. Intraspecific genetic variation of S. arieticanis and S. tenella.
Sequence Similarity, %Intermediate HostCountryNCBI GenBank Acc. No.Reference
S. arieticanis
99.33–99.78Ovis ariesSpainMK419975–MK419976[7]
98.77–99.11Ovis ariesChinaMF039324[4]
92.39–93.85Ovis ariesEgyptMH413047–MH413048[14]
S. tenella
97.77–99.89Ovis aries musimonAustriaMW768881–MW768899[25]
98.76–99.78Rupicapra rupicapra tatricaPolandKP263744–KP263751[28]
98.66–99.78Ammotragus lerviaSpainMW848314–MW848319[29]
98.43–99.78Ovis ariesSpainMK419977–MK420010[7]
98.21–99.78Ovis ariesNorwayKC209723–KC209732[24]
98.96–99.65Ovis ammonChinaMH561854[9]
98.55–99.55Ovis ariesIndiaMH523439–MH523443[3]
97.32–98.10Ovis ariesChinaMF039322–MF039323[4]
95.86–97.54Ovis ariesEgyptMH413045–MH413046[14]
Table 3. The identification of S. arieticanis and S. tenella using the nPCR method applied in the present study.
Table 3. The identification of S. arieticanis and S. tenella using the nPCR method applied in the present study.
SpeciesSequence Similarity, %
Intraspecific VariationInterpsecific Variation
Comparison between Isolates Obtained in the Present StudyComparison of Sequences from
the Same Species
Available in Genbank
S. arieticanis97.54–10091.36–99.6986.83–88.09 S. hircicanis,
77.35–79.30 S. cervicanis,
76.47–78.57 S. capracanis
S. tenella97.93–10095.27–10089.05–92.63 S. capracanis,
86.73–87.91 S. heydorni,
81.55–84.52 S. gracilis
Table 4. The distribution of S. arieticanis and S. tenella in different muscle types of sheep raised in Lithuania.
Table 4. The distribution of S. arieticanis and S. tenella in different muscle types of sheep raised in Lithuania.
Positive Cases of Sarcocystis spp.Muscle Type
DiaphragmOesophagusHeart
Sarcocystis spp.69/69 (100 %)67/69 (97.10 %)52/52 (100 %)
S. arieticanis overall65/69 (94.20 %)63/69 (91.30 %)46/52 (88.46 %)
S. tenella overall **69/69 (100 %) a,***57/69 (82.61 %) b,***49/52 (94.23 %)
S. arieticanis single infection0/69 (0 %)10/69 (14.49 %)3/52 (5.77 %)
S. tenella single infection4/69 (5.80 %)4/69 (5.80 %)6/52 (11.54 %)
Mixed infections with S. arieticanis and S. tenella *65/69 (94.20 %) c,**53/69 (76.81 %) d,**43/52 (82.69 %)
The prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. depending on the age group of sheep
S. arieticanis in sheep younger than two years42/46 (91.3 %)41/46 (89.1 %)29/31 (93.5 %)
S. arieticanis in sheep older than two years23/23 (100 %)22/23 (95.7 %)17/21 (81.0 %)
S. tenella in sheep younger than two years46/46 (100 %)39/46 (84.8 %)30/31 (96.8 %)
S. tenella in sheep older than two years23/23 (100 %)18/23 (78.3 %)19/21 (90.5 %)
a > b, c > d. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marandykina-Prakienė, A.; Butkauskas, D.; Gudiškis, N.; Juozaitytė-Ngugu, E.; Januškevičius, V.; Rudaitytė-Lukošienė, E.; Prakas, P. Molecular Identification of Sarcocystis Species in Sheep from Lithuania. Animals 2022, 12, 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162048

AMA Style

Marandykina-Prakienė A, Butkauskas D, Gudiškis N, Juozaitytė-Ngugu E, Januškevičius V, Rudaitytė-Lukošienė E, Prakas P. Molecular Identification of Sarcocystis Species in Sheep from Lithuania. Animals. 2022; 12(16):2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marandykina-Prakienė, Alina, Dalius Butkauskas, Naglis Gudiškis, Evelina Juozaitytė-Ngugu, Vytautas Januškevičius, Eglė Rudaitytė-Lukošienė, and Petras Prakas. 2022. "Molecular Identification of Sarcocystis Species in Sheep from Lithuania" Animals 12, no. 16: 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162048

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop