Next Article in Journal
The Welfare of Traveller and Gypsy Owned Horses in the UK and Ireland
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Sarcidano Horse Coat Color Genes
Previous Article in Journal
Facial Expressions of Horses Using Weighted Multivariate Statistics for Assessment of Subtle Local Pain Induced by Polylactide-Based Polymers Implanted Subcutaneously
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Selective Analysis of Boer Goat to Investigate the Dynamic Heredity Evolution under Different Stages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Population Structure and Selection Signatures of Yunling Goat Based on RAD-seq

1
School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
2
School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
3
College of Life Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(18), 2401; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12182401
Submission received: 22 August 2022 / Revised: 7 September 2022 / Accepted: 10 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Genetic Diversity in Livestock and Companion Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Goats are important domestic animals that provide meat, milk, fur, and other products for humans. The demand for these products has increased in recent years. Disease resistance among goat breeds is different, but the genetic basis of the differences in resistance to diseases is still unclear and needs to be further studied. In this study, many genes and pathways related to immunity and diseases were identified to be under positive selection between Yunling and Nubian goats using RAD-seq technology. This study on the selection signatures of Yunling goats provides the scientific basis and technical support for the breeding of domestic goats for disease resistance, which has important social and economic significance.

Abstract

Animal diseases impose a huge burden on the countries where diseases are endemic. Conventional control strategies of vaccines and veterinary drugs are to control diseases from a pharmaceutical perspective. Another alternative approach is using pre-existing genetic disease resistance or tolerance. We know that the Yunling goat is an excellent local breed from Yunnan, southwestern China, which has characteristics of strong disease resistance and remarkable adaptability. However, genetic information about the selection signatures of Yunling goats is limited. We reasoned that the genes underlying the observed difference in disease resistance might be identified by investigating selection signatures between two different goat breeds. Herein, we selected the Nubian goat as the reference group to perform the population structure and selection signature analysis by using RAD-seq technology. The results showed that two goat breeds were divided into two clusters, but there also existed gene flow. We used Fst (F-statistics) and π (pi/θπ) methods to carry out selection signature analysis. Eight selected regions and 91 candidate genes were identified, in which some genes such as DOK2, TIMM17A, MAVS, and DOCK8 related to disease and immunity and some genes such as SPEFI, CDC25B, and MIR103 were associated with reproduction. Four GO (Gene Ontology) terms (GO:0010591, GO:001601, GO:0038023, and GO:0017166) were associated with cell migration, signal transduction, and immune responses. The KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) signaling pathways were mainly associated with immune responses, inflammatory responses, and stress reactions. This study preliminarily revealed the genetic basis of strong disease resistance and adaptability of Yunling goats. It provides a theoretical basis for the subsequent genetic breeding of disease resistance of goats.

1. Introduction

The domestic goat (Capra hircus) is one of the most important livestock species [1], which plays an important role in human history and culture. Currently, animal diseases have become a global concern and restrict the healthy development of animal husbandry with the rapid development of the livestock industry [2]. Drug treatment and vaccination contribute greatly to the prevention and treatment of animal diseases, but some chemical drugs are expensive and require strict adherence to the treatment process, and long-term drug use can increase pathogen resistance. The use of vaccination methods requires organized and coordinated vaccination programs. What is more, the prevention and control of diseases through immunization or drug treatment cannot fundamentally eliminate and control the occurrence and prevalence of diseases [3]. Additionally, eradication of this threat is impossible, as there are pathogens everywhere in the wild [4]. Other attractive methods including breeding for disease resistance are needed. Some research showed that the disease resistance and susceptibility of livestock were influenced by genetics [5], the environment [6], and other factors. Therefore, it is interesting to research selection signatures to find the candidate genes which relate to goats’ disease resistance. The Yunling goat is the largest in number and the most widely distributed local goat breed from Yunnan province of southwestern China, which has strong disease resistance and good adaptability. The Nubian goat is a popular commercialized breed and exhibits a fast growth rate, which is susceptible to parasites [7]. According to the breeders’ observation, the Yunling goats are less prone to diseases [8], while the Nubian goats are prone to diseases. This difference is interesting, but the genetic mechanism and genes associated with low morbidity are not known in Yunling goats.
In recent years, with the rapid development of next-generation sequencing technology, whole genome SNP chips, reduced-representation sequencing (RRS), and whole genome resequencing techniques have been widely used for genotyping [9,10,11]. Among RRS approaches are those based on restriction site-associated fragments. This method has great advantages in the number of SNPs acquired and the ability to identify novel SNPs compared with SNP chip technology. Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) is one of the RRS technologies, which can be used to survey a host of unlinked genetic markers adjacent to restriction sites [12,13] and applied to the research of the gene flow [14,15,16], phylogenetic research [17], and mapping genes of important traits [10,12,18,19,20]. In particular, RAD-seq technology is widely used in some domestic animals, including chickens [21,22] and pigs [23]. However, the technology that can be applied to study the selection signatures and find disease-resistant candidate genes of Yunling goats is still lacking.
At present, the research mainly focuses on meat performance and fecundity of Yunling goats [24,25]. However, what is the current genetic differentiation regarding the Yunling goat population? Does this goat breed possess selection markers and important candidate genes related to disease resistance traits? These questions remain to be addressed for the Yunling goat. Herein, we conducted RAD-seq analysis to solve the above problems. Firstly, we carried out RAD-seq data analysis for the two breeds. Secondly, we executed the population structure analysis. Finally, we performed selection signature analysis using both the population differentiation index (FST) and π ratio methods.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Approval Statement

Ear skin tissue samples were collected by veterinary practitioners with the permission and in the presence of the owners and under permission from the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Yunnan University. Veterinarians followed standard procedures and relevant national guidelines to ensure appropriate animal care.

2.2. Sample Collection and Genomic DNA Extraction

We collected the ear skin tissues of 120 Yunling goats (YR) and 112 Nubian goats (NBY) from Yongren county, Chuxiong prefecture, Yunnan province of China. Then, 60 samples were randomly selected from the above-collected ear skin samples of Yunling and Nubian goats. Finally, a total of 120 samples were used for subsequent study. All samples were preserved in absolute ethanol and later stored at −80 °C in the laboratory. Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and the DNA purity was determined with NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and then diluted to the working concentration (30–50%). The concentration of DNA was quantitatively detected by Picogreen fluorescent dye staining, and the integrity was detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.3. RAD-seq Data Analysis and Genome Alignment

We selected the San Clemente genome (BioProject: PRJNA290100, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF 001704415.2, accessed on 12 August 2022) as the reference genome. The library for RAD-seq was created according to the established method [26]. The EcoRI was used as a single restriction enzyme. Each sample was digested by EcoRI (recognition site, G|AATTC). Then, we conducted P1 adapter ligation, purification, and DNA shearing. Next, we selected and extracted inserted fragment sizes of about 300–480 bp. Then, we ligated the P2 adapter to the sheared fragments. Finally, we selectively amplified RAD tags. The Illumina HiseqTM platform was used for sequencing after the library passed the quality inspection, and the sequencing strategy was IlluminaPE150.
According to the statistics of base content distribution, it was found that the G and C content in this data is roughly equal, and the same was true between A and T. This demonstrated that there is no GC separation and AT separation phenomenon. The sequencing error rate was less than 0.0004%. The sequencing quality of data is counted in Table S1. In this study, the Q30 rate of base quality was used to show the error rate. Additionally, the GC content (44.24%) was similar to that of the reference genome (43.15%). Clean data were obtained for subsequent analysis by fastp software (https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp, accessed on 6 September 2022) to filter raw data. The following steps were performed: trim the adapter; after that, cut out the bases with sequencing quality values below 20 or identified as N at the 5′ end and the bases with quality values below 3 or identified as N at the 3′ end. Next, take 4 bases as a window, and cut out the bases in the window with an average mass value less than 20. Then, remove reads which contain 10% of N, and cut out the reads in which more than 40% of the bases’ quality values are below 15. Finally, discard the reads that are less than 30 bp in length after adapter trimming and quality pruning. After quality control, the eligible fragments were aligned with the reference genome using the MEM algorithm in BWA software v0.7.17 (Heng Li and Richard Durbin, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK) [27]. Subsequently, we used the Best Practices progress in GATK v4.2.4.0 (https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us, accessed on 14 April 2022) to check the bam file and used Haplotyper to detect InDel and SNP sites. The detected SNP sites were filtered using the vcfutils tool provided by SAMtools software v0.1.19 (Heng Li, et al, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK) [28]. The quality control criteria of SNPs were a sequencing depth greater than 2 and minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.05. ANNOVAR software (Kai Wang, et al, Center for Applied Genomics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA) [29] and the gff file of reference genome were used to obtain SNP and InDel annotation information.

2.4. Phylogenetic Tree Construction and Population Structure Analysis

A maximum likelihood (ML) tree was constructed using RAxML-VI-HPC v2.0.1 (Alexandros Stamatakis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland) [30]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using GCTA software v1.93.3beta2 (JianYang, et al, Queensland Statistical Genetics Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) [31]. ADMIXTURE v1.30 (http://dalexander.github.io/admixture/download.html, accessed on 27 November 2021) [32] was used to analyze the population structure and calculate the corresponding cross-validation error value (CV) of the cluster (K = 2–4).

2.5. Selection Signature Analysis and Enrichment Analysis

We used the population differentiation index (FST) and nucleotide diversity (π/pi/θπ) [33] methods to detect positive selection signatures in Yunling goats. For the FST method, the FST values were calculated by using vcftools v0.1.15 (Petr Danecek, et al., Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK) [34]; then, FST values were sorted from largest to smallest, and the SNPs corresponding to the top 1% FST values were considered to represent a selection signature. For the π method, the π value was obtained by calculating the average difference between any two nucleotide sequences in the breed. The region with a higher FST value and lower π value was considered a candidate region. To obtain candidate genes, we executed gene annotation based on the information from the reference genome. Furthermore, to understand the biological functions of candidate genes, we performed the gene ontology (GO) analysis using DAVID v6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/, accessed on 19 March 2022) [35,36] and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis using KOBAS v3.0 (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn/, accessed on 19 March 2022) [37].

3. Results

3.1. Identify SNPs and InDels

The average number of high-quality reads obtained per sample was 19,379,372 (Table S1). A total of 685.56 GB of data were obtained for all 120 samples, with an average of 5.72 GB per sample. About 99.92% of clean reads were mapped to the reference genome. The number of reads matching the sequenced fragment length was 95.26% of clean reads (Table S2). The distribution of insert size was consistent with a normal distribution, and the central value was about 400 bp, indicating that there was no abnormality in the construction of the library. The mean genome coverage of all samples was 21.4% (1×) or 13.2% (5×), and the mean depth of coverage was 2 (Table S2). We obtained a total of 221,922,681 SNPs for all individuals, and the average number of SNPs per sample was 1,849,356 (Table S3). We also conducted InDels statistics and obtained 34,316,081 InDels. The details of InDel data are presented in Table S4. We mainly based the subsequent analysis on SNP data. The number of transitions was greater than the number of transversions for SNP mutation types, and the average ratio of those two mutation types was 2. This result indicated that SNP mutations in goats have the phenomenon of “transitions bias” [38]. The bias may be due to the long-term evolution of species to reduce harmful mutations or other internal reasons, such as the structure of purines and pyrimidines in DNA [39,40]. The average number of homozygous genotypes (1,030,230) was more extensive than heterozygous SNP sites (819,126). It is speculated that the artificial selection of goats during the domestication process may affect the probability of SNP homozygosity. After filtering, we obtained 151,071 SNPs for subsequent analysis.

3.2. Phylogenetic Tree and Population Structure between Two Goat Breeds

A phylogenetic tree (ML) based on 151,071 SNPs showed that most goat individuals were divided into two clusters, one cluster of which was the Yunling goat and the other cluster of which was the Nubian goat. A few individuals were intermixed into other clusters, showing that there exists gene flow between the two breeds (Figure 1a). The PCA analysis was consistent with the results of the ML tree (Figure 1b). We calculated the corresponding cross-validation error value (CV) of the clusters (K = 2–4), and the CV was 0.51457, 0.51450, and 0.52325, respectively. The lowest CV value (0.51450) was found at K = 3 (Figure 2), showing that the majority of individuals in the two goat groups share multiple common ancestral lineages except for a few pure-blooded individuals.

3.3. Identify Candidate Genes and Pathways Associated with Traits

In this study, we selected the Yunling goat as the target population and the Nubian goat as the reference population. Some regions with a high FST value and low π value showed a high degree of genetic differentiation between the two breeds and low nucleotide polymorphism. The regions with FST and π values in the top 1% of the empirical distribution were considered candidate signatures. This result displayed that there were eight regions mainly concentrated on chromosomes 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 16 (Table 1; Figure 3).
A total of 91 candidate genes were screened from 8 selected regions (Table 1). Among some genes associated with disease and immunity, DOK2 and TIMM17A are related to cancer, LMODI is linked to hypoperistalsis [41], MAVS is essential for virus-activated signaling pathways [42], and DOCK8 is linked to humoral immunity [43]. Some genes are related to reproduction and economic traits. For example, SPEFI is associated with spermatogenesis [44], CDC25B plays an important role in oocyte meiosis [45], and MIR103 is related to the control of the accumulation of milk fat in the mammary gland of goats during lactation [46] (Table 2).
These 91 genes were used for GO analysis in DAVID v6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/, accessed on 19 March 2022) and KEGG enrichment analysis in KOBAS v3.0 (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn/, accessed on 19 March 2022). The GO analysis was significantly enriched in 10 GO terms (p < 0.05) (Table 3). Some important GO terms were found, including the regulation of lamellipodium assembly (GO:0010591), which was associated with cell migration and endocytosis; dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex (GO:0016010), signaling receptor activity (GO:0038023), and vinculin binding (GO:0017166), the first two of which related to signal transduction and the last of which to immune response; troponin complex (GO:0005861) and actin-binding (GO:0003779) related to muscle contraction regulation control; and positive regulation of meiosis I (GO:0060903) and negative regulation of substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreading (GO:1900025) were associated with cell proliferation and cell adhesion. The KEGG pathway was mainly enriched in the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway (chx04623), MAPK signaling pathway (chx04010), long-term potentiation (chx04720), and calcium signaling pathway (chx04020) (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

The Yunling goat is a kind of typical meat goat, which has a strong reproductive capacity, adaptability, and disease resistance under the condition of free-ranging and coarse feeding for a long time [25,57]. After a long period of natural and artificial selection, the selection signals associated with the above traits can be found through genetic research [58,59]. The method of finding selection signatures has been widely applied to explore the genomic regions and selected genes of many livestock species during domestication based on SNP datasets, such as goats [60,61,62], sheep [63,64], cattle [65,66,67], and pig [68]. Our research aimed to find genes related to the above characteristics by RAD-seq analysis. In this study, we used two selection signature methods (FST and π) to screen out the candidate genes related to the excellent traits of the Yunling goat.
Based on the above research steps, the result showed that 91 candidate genes were identified from eight selected regions, and some genes were associated with disease resistance and environmental adaptation (such as DOK2, DOCK8, TIMM17A, LMODI, MAVS, and TNNT2). DOK2 is a well-known tumor suppressor gene in solid tumors and a member of the downstream protein DOK family of tyrosine kinases [69,70]. DOCK8 plays an important role in the persistence and survival of germinal center B cells [43], which are related to humoral immunity. Mutation of DOCK8 in mice had profound effects on humoral immunity with a failure to sustain the antibody response and germinal center B cell persistence [71]. Other genes such as TIMM17A offer a marker and a novel mitochondrial target for human breast cancer [56]; LMODI is associated with intestinal peristalsis function and is defined as a disease gene for megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome [41]; the mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) adaptor protein is a central signaling hub for the antiviral response, as this gene plays an important role in the antiviral immune process [42]; cardiac troponin T (TNNT2), as a member of the troponin superfamily, plays an important role in myocardial cell contraction and relaxation [72,73], and TNNT2 is essential for regulating muscle contraction and assembling the tropomyosin-troponin complex during early cardiogenesis [74,75]. The above results provide genetic evidence for the previous claims of disease resistance and environmental adaptability of Yunling goats [8,76], and we identified candidate genes related to disease resistance and adaptation by selective signal analysis. The reason why immune-related genes are selected in Yunling goats is closely related to their living environment and domestication history. In many studies of disease resistance in domestic animals, genes involved in enhancing adaptation and immunity are positively selected and up-regulated in the breeds that live in more hostile environments [5,77,78,79]. The study of these genes or selective markers is the theoretical basis for future breeding in animal husbandry. Additionally, we detected some genes (SPEFI, CDC25B, MIR103, etc.) related to reproduction and economic traits (Table 2). SPEFI is associated with spermatogenesis [44], CDC25B plays an important role in oocyte meiosis [45], and MIR103 is important for goat milk fat synthesis [46].
In our study, the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex (GO:0016010) and signaling receptor activity (GO:0038023) related to signal transduction, and vinculin binding (GO:0017166) was related to immune response. The UTRN, included in the GO: 0017166 term as a tumor suppressor gene, is involved in various cancer progressions [80,81,82]. Studies on UTRN in melanoma showed that reduced expression of this gene was related to advanced clinical characteristics, shorter survival time, and poorer prognosis, but up-regulated UTRN expression inhibited melanoma cell proliferation when compared to the control group [83]. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is an important melanoma risk factor that has multiple effects on the skin, including alterations in cutaneous immune function and inflammatory responses involving macrophages and neutrophils [84,85,86]. UTRN was involved in this GO term in our study, so it was speculated that the selection of this gene in Yunling goats may be related to the environment of high altitude and strong ultraviolet radiation. However, whether this gene is related to animal ultraviolet resistance still needs further research. Three pathways of four KEGG pathways were related to immune response and environmental adaptability (Table 3). Among them, the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway (chx04623) is related to cell recognition of alien invading microorganisms and non-host DNA, which was related to the generation of the innate immune response [87]. In this pathway, the DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors (DAI), the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family, AIM2 triggers, and many other receptors conducted cytosolic DNA-sensing system in innate immunity [87]. MAVS was enriched in this pathway for our study. According to research, mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) mediated the activation of NF-κB and IRF 3 in response to viral infection and was required for upstream of the phosphorylation of IRF 3 and IκB and downstream of RIG-I [88]. The second pathway was the MAPK signaling pathway (chx04010), which is a key signaling element that regulates basic processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, and stress responses [89,90,91]. Members of the MAPK super kinase family have a dual role since they act as activators or inhibitors and regulate cell behaviors through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms [92]. The third pathway was the calcium signaling pathway (chx04020). It is important in intercellular signal transduction, and the magnitude and duration of Ca2+ changes determine the type and duration of their effects on intracellular signaling [93]. Ca2+ regulation change in lymphocytes leads to various autoimmune and inflammatory effects and immunodeficiency [94]. These results indicated that the Yunling goat and Nubian goat have differences in responding to external stimuli [95], a variety of cellular stress responses [93], and inflammatory responses [87,96].
In conclusion, this study used the FST and π methods to carry out selection signature analysis and found that some genes and pathways were associated with disease, immune, and stress responses. These results help us to better understand the biological mechanisms of disease resistance and environmental adaptation of Yunling goats. Future research needs to verify these results by whole-genome resequencing or some functional validation studies. According to the results of the current genetic differentiation of the Yunling goat involved in this study, it is necessary to adopt scientific and rational breeding methods to reduce unreasonable inbreeding, improve the genetic diversity of the population, and protect the excellent traits of the Yunling goat in advance. It has practical significance for the sustainable development of the domestic goat industry in the future.

5. Conclusions

Through the study of two different goat breeds, we obtained a deeper understanding of Yunnan’s local livestock resources. Sequencing results demonstrated the feasibility of RAD-seq in the study. Our research provides a theoretical basis for genetic breeding of goat disease resistance in the future and helps to trace the genetic differences among goat breeds. The selection signature and candidate gene related to disease resistance in this study may be a biomarker for goat selection. Fully understanding the genetic mechanism and complex nature is likely to be a complicated challenge. Yet, in deciphering these networks, we may address how the disease resistance is generated, and understand in-depth the genetic resource of good characteristics of the indigenous livestock. With the development of next-generation sequencing and multi-omics data analysis, in the next step, we can integrate multiple technologies to solve problems.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12182401/s1, Table S1: Statistical table of sequencing quality; Table S2: Statistical table of the results of genome Alignment; Table S3: Statistical table of SNP; Table S4: Statistical table of InDel.

Author Contributions

S.C. conceived and designed the research. S.C., J.S. and C.L. collected samples. J.S. extracted genomic DNA. J.S., Y.C. and R.L. performed bioinformatics analyses. Y.C., R.L., S.C., H.X. and C.L. wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China, grant number No. 2021YFD1200902 and the Top Young Talents Program of Ten Thousand Plan of Yunnan Province, grant number YNWRQNBJ-2018-024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Committee on Animal Research and Ethics of Yunnan University (ynucae20190011).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The genotypic data were available at Figshare (https://figshare.com/, accessed on 29 July 2022) with a doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.20294343.

Acknowledgments

We thank local farmers and veterinarians for their kind support in collecting samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cai, Y.; Fu, W.; Cai, D.; Heller, R.; Zheng, Z.; Wen, J.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Alshawi, A.; Sun, Z.; et al. Ancient Genomes Reveal the Evolutionary History and Origin of Cashmere-Producing Goats in China. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 2099–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jie, W.; Yulin, C. Study on Chinese goat breed resources and genetic diversity. J. Domest. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 26, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jensen, K.; Paxton, E.; Waddington, D.; Talbot, R.; Darghouth, M.A.; Glass, E.J. Differences in the transcriptional responses induced by Theileria annulata infection in bovine monocytes derived from resistant and susceptible cattle breeds. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Glass, E.J.; Jensen, K. Resistance and susceptibility to a protozoan parasite of cattle—Gene expression differences in macrophages from different breeds of cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2007, 120, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Glass, E.J.; Crutchley, S.; Jensen, K. Living with the enemy or uninvited guests: Functional genomics approaches to investigating host resistance or tolerance traits to a protozoan parasite, Theileria annulata, in cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2012, 148, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Arsenopoulos, K.V.; Fthenakis, G.C.; Katsarou, E.I.; Papadopoulos, E. Haemonchosis: A Challenging Parasitic Infection of Sheep and Goats. Animals 2021, 11, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rahmatalla, S.A.; Arends, D.; Reissmann, M.; Ahmed, A.S.; Wimmers, K.; Reyer, H.; Brockmann, G.A. Whole genome population genetics analysis of Sudanese goats identifies regions harboring genes associated with major traits. BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yunnan Commission of Animal Genetic Resources. Animal Genetic Resources in Yunnan; Yunnan Science and Technology Press: Kunming, China, 2015; pp. 181–228. [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, X.; Feng, Q.; Qian, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, A.; Guan, J.; Fan, D.; Weng, Q.; Huang, T.; et al. High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elshire, R.J.; Glaubitz, J.C.; Sun, Q.; Poland, J.A.; Kawamoto, K.; Buckler, E.S.; Mitchell, S.E. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsuchihashi, Z.; Dracopoli, N.C. Progress in high throughput SNP genotyping methods. Pharm. J. 2002, 2, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baird, N.A.; Etter, P.D.; Atwood, T.S.; Currey, M.C.; Shiver, A.L.; Lewis, Z.A.; Selker, E.U.; Cresko, W.A.; Johnson, E.A. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peterson, B.K.; Weber, J.N.; Kay, E.H.; Fisher, H.S.; Hoekstra, H.E. Double digest RADseq: An inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morley, M.; Molony, C.M.; Weber, T.M.; Devlin, J.L.; Ewens, K.G.; Spielman, R.S.; Cheung, V.G. Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression. Nature 2004, 430, 743–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Orita, R.; Nagano, Y.; Kawamura, Y.; Kimura, K.; Kobayashi, G. Genetic diversity and population structure of razor clam Sinonovacula constricta in Ariake Bay, Japan, revealed using RAD-Seq SNP markers. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cariou, M.; Henri, H.; Martinez, S.; Duret, L.; Charlat, S. How consistent is RAD-seq divergence with DNA-barcode based clustering in insects? Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 1294–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miller, J.M.; Moore, S.S.; Stothard, P.; Liao, X.; Coltman, D.W. Harnessing cross-species alignment to discover SNPs and generate a draft genome sequence of a bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baxter, S.W.; Davey, J.W.; Johnston, J.S.; Shelton, A.M.; Heckel, D.G.; Jiggins, C.D.; Blaxter, M.L. Linkage mapping and comparative genomics using next-generation RAD sequencing of a non-model organism. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pfender, W.F.; Saha, M.C.; Johnson, E.A.; Slabaugh, M.B. Mapping with RAD (restriction-site associated DNA) markers to rapidly identify QTL for stem rust resistance in Lolium perenne. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 122, 1467–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Palaiokostas, C.; Cariou, S.; Bestin, A.; Bruant, J.-S.; Haffray, P.; Morin, T.; Cabon, J.; Allal, F.; Vandeputte, M.; Houston, R.D. Genome-wide association and genomic prediction of resistance to viral nervous necrosis in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) using RAD sequencing. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2018, 50, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhai, Z.; Zhao, W.; He, C.; Yang, K.; Tang, L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Q.; Meng, H. SNP discovery and genotyping using restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing in chickens. Anim. Genet. 2015, 46, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.Z.; Li, G.H.; Zhang, Y.P.; Zhang, H.Y.; Yan, J.M.; Su, Y.J.; Wang, K.H.; Han, W.; Zou, J.M. Conservation Status Evaluation of Two Luyuan Chicken Populations Based on RAD-seq Simplified Genome Sequencing Technology Acta Vet. Zootech. Sin. 2017, 48, 818–825. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yong, L.; Ze-Pu, M.; Xiao-Yun, M.; Man-Man, Y.; Qiang, W.; Xiao-Feng, G.; Hua, Z.; Ming, F. The Application of RAD-seq Technology on Genomic Selection of Fertility Traits for Large White Pigs (Sus scrofa). J. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 25, 1508–1515. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ying, Z.; Shaoyi, H.; Yongxian, D.; Zhimin, Y.; Chengyu, G. Study on the characteristics of Yunling goats. Chin. Livest. Poult. Breed. 2016, 12, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yiduan, L.; Limin, S.; Jun, D.; Wenkun, X. Introduction of genetic resources of local goat and sheep breeds in Yunnan Province. Yunnan Agric. 2021, 4, 82–85. [Google Scholar]
  26. Etter, P.D.; Bassham, S.; Hohenlohe, P.A.; Johnson, E.A.; Cresko, W.A. SNP discovery and genotyping for evolutionary genetics using RAD sequencing. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 772, 157–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, K.; Li, M.; Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: Functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yang, J.; Lee, S.H.; Goddard, M.E.; Visscher, P.M. GCTA: A tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 88, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Alexander, D.H.; Novembre, J.; Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nei, M.; Li, W.H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 5269–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Danecek, P.; Auton, A.; Abecasis, G.; Albers, C.A.; Banks, E.; DePristo, M.A.; Handsaker, R.E.; Lunter, G.; Marth, G.T.; Sherry, S.T.; et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2156–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sherman, B.T.; Hao, M.; Qiu, J.; Jiao, X.; Baseler, M.W.; Lane, H.C.; Imamichi, T.; Chang, W. DAVID: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W216–W221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bu, D.; Luo, H.; Huo, P.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; He, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Guo, J.; et al. KOBAS-i: Intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W317–W325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Collins, D.W.; Jukes, T.H. Rates of transition and transversion in coding sequences since the human-rodent divergence. Genomics 1994, 20, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wakeley, J. The excess of transitions among nucleotide substitutions: New methods of estimating transition bias underscore its significance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996, 11, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, W.H.; Wu, C.I.; Luo, C.C. Nonrandomness of point mutation as reflected in nucleotide substitutions in pseudogenes and its evolutionary implications. J. Mol. Evol. 1984, 21, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Halim, D.; Wilson, M.P.; Oliver, D.; Brosens, E.; Verheij, J.B.G.M.; Han, Y.; Nanda, V.; Lyu, Q.; Doukas, M.; Stoop, H.; et al. Loss of LMOD1 impairs smooth muscle cytocontractility and causes megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome in humans and mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E2739–E2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zamorano Cuervo, N.; Osseman, Q.; Grandvaux, N. Virus Infection Triggers MAVS Polymers of Distinct Molecular Weight. Viruses 2018, 10, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Randall, K.L.; Lambe, T.; Goodnow, C.C.; Cornall, R.J. The essential role of DOCK8 in humoral immunity. Dis. Markers 2010, 29, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chan, S.W.; Fowler, K.J.; Choo, K.H.; Kalitsis, P. Spef1, a conserved novel testis protein found in mouse sperm flagella. Gene 2005, 353, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kang, H.; Hwang, S.C.; Park, Y.S.; Oh, J.S. Cdc25B phosphatase participates in maintaining metaphase II arrest in mouse oocytes. Mol. Cells 2013, 35, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lin, X.; Luo, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, W.; Gou, D. MiR-103 controls milk fat accumulation in goat (Capra hircus) mammary gland during lactation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Secco, B.; Camiré, E.; Brière, M.-A.; Caron, A.; Billong, A.; Gélinas, Y.; Lemay, A.-M.; Tharp, K.M.; Lee, P.L.; Gobeil, S.; et al. Amplification of Adipogenic Commitment by VSTM2A. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Berger, A.H.; Chen, M.; Morotti, A.; Janas, J.A.; Niki, M.; Bronson, R.T.; Taylor, B.S.; Ladanyi, M.; Van Aelst, L.; Politi, K.; et al. DOK2 inhibits EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miyagaki, H.; Yamasaki, M.; Takahashi, T.; Kurokawa, Y.; Miyata, H.; Nakajima, K.; Takiguchi, S.; Fujiwara, Y.; Mori, M.; Doki, Y. DOK2 as a marker of poor prognosis of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after curative resection. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 19, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wen, X.; Zhou, M.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Yu, L.; Wang, X.; Peng, X. Expression and significance of DOK2 in colorectal cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2015, 9, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, J.; Peng, X.; Zhang, K.; Li, C.; Su, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, W. Co-expression and significance of Dok2 and Ras p21 protein activator 1 in breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 5386–5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jones, J.M.; Morrell, J.C.; Gould, S.J. Identification and characterization of HAOX1, HAOX2, and HAOX3, three human peroxisomal 2-hydroxy acid oxidases. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 12590–12597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Barton, P.J.; Townsend, P.J.; Brand, N.J.; Yacoub, M.H. Localization of the fast skeletal muscle troponin I gene (TNNI2) to 11p15.5: Genes for troponin I and T are organized in pairs. Ann. Hum. Genet. 1997, 61, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Weiskirchen, R.; Gunther, K. The CRP/MLP/TLP family of LIM domain proteins: Acting by connecting. Bioessays 2003, 25, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Miyasaka, K.Y.; Kida, Y.S.; Sato, T.; Minami, M.; Ogura, T. Csrp1 regulates dynamic cell movements of the mesendoderm and cardiac mesoderm through interactions with Dishevelled and Diversin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11274–11279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Salhab, M.; Patani, N.; Jiang, W.; Mokbel, K. High TIMM17A expression is associated with adverse pathological and clinical outcomes in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2012, 19, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Miao, Q.; Huang, S.Y.; Qin, S.Y.; Yu, X.; Yang, Y.; Yang, J.F.; Zhu, X.Q.; Zou, F.C. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in Yunnan black goats (Capra hircus) in southwest China by PCR-RFLP. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Park, S.D.E.; Magee, D.A.; McGettigan, P.A.; Teasdale, M.D.; Edwards, C.J.; Lohan, A.J.; Murphy, A.; Braud, M.; Donoghue, M.T.; Liu, Y.; et al. Genome sequencing of the extinct Eurasian wild aurochs, Bos primigenius, illuminates the phylogeography and evolution of cattle. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jia, X.J.; Chen, Y.L.; Wang, S.J.; Lu, Z.T.; Zhang, C.L.; Zhang, Z.J.; Ren, C.H. Genetic diversity analysis of microsatellite DNA of nine goat breeds. J. Anhui Agric. Univ. 2019, 46, 779–784. [Google Scholar]
  60. Burren, A.; Neuditschko, M.; Signer-Hasler, H.; Frischknecht, M.; Reber, I.; Menzi, F.; Drogemuller, C.; Flury, C. Genetic diversity analyses reveal first insights into breed-specific selection signatures within Swiss goat breeds. Anim. Genet. 2016, 47, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, E.S.; Elbeltagy, A.R.; Aboul-Naga, A.M.; Rischkowsky, B.; Sayre, B.; Mwacharo, J.M.; Rothschild, M.F. Multiple genomic signatures of selection in goats and sheep indigenous to a hot arid environment. Heredity 2016, 116, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Brito, L.F.; Jafarikia, M.; Grossi, D.A.; Kijas, J.W.; Porto-Neto, L.R.; Ventura, R.V.; Salgorzaei, M.; Schenkel, F.S. Characterization of linkage disequilibrium, consistency of gametic phase and admixture in Australian and Canadian goats. BMC Genet. 2015, 16, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kijas, J.W.; Lenstra, J.A.; Hayes, B.; Boitard, S.; Porto Neto, L.R.; San Cristobal, M.; Servin, B.; McCulloch, R.; Whan, V.; Gietzen, K.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of the world’s sheep breeds reveals high levels of historic mixture and strong recent selection. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10, e1001258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Purfield, D.C.; McParland, S.; Wall, E.; Berry, D.P. The distribution of runs of homozygosity and selection signatures in six commercial meat sheep breeds. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Taye, M.; Lee, W.; Caetano-Anolles, K.; Dessie, T.; Hanotte, O.; Mwai, O.A.; Kemp, S.; Cho, S.; Oh, S.J.; Lee, H.-K.; et al. Whole genome detection of signature of positive selection in African cattle reveals selection for thermotolerance. Anim. Sci. J. 2017, 88, 1889–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Daetwyler, H.D.; Capitan, A.; Pausch, H.; Stothard, P.; Van Binsbergen, R.; Brøndum, R.F.; Liao, X.; Djari, A.; Rodriguez, S.C.; Grohs, C.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xu, L.; Bickhart, D.M.; Cole, J.B.; Schroeder, S.G.; Song, J.; Tassell, C.P.; Sonstegard, T.S.; Liu, G.E. Genomic signatures reveal new evidences for selection of important traits in domestic cattle. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 711–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, M.; Tian, S.; Jin, L.; Zhou, G.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Yeung, C.K.L.; Chen, L.; Ma, J.; et al. Genomic analyses identify distinct patterns of selection in domesticated pigs and Tibetan wild boars. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mashima, R.; Arimura, S.; Kajikawa, S.; Oda, H.; Nakae, S.; Yamanashi, Y. Dok adaptors play anti-inflammatory roles in pulmonary homeostasis. Genes Cells 2013, 18, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sun, P.; Li, R.; Meng, Y.; Xi, S.; Wang, Q.; Yang, X.; Peng, X.; Cai, J. Introduction to DOK2 and its potential role in cancer. Physiol. Res. 2021, 70, 671–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Randall, K.L.; Lambe, T.; Johnson, A.L.; Treanor, B.; Kucharska, E.; Domaschenz, H.; Whittle, B.; Tze, L.E.; Enders, A.; Crockford, T.L.; et al. Dock8 mutations cripple B cell immunological synapses, germinal centers and long-lived antibody production. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 1283–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, L.P.; Zhang, J.; Wei, X.L.; Chen, N.; Huang, C.X.; Xu, M.X.; Wang, W.M.; Wang, H.L. Megalobrama amblycephala cardiac troponin T variants: Molecular cloning, expression and response to nitrite. Gene 2013, 527, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kamisago, M.; Sharma, S.D.; DePalma, S.R.; Solomon, S.; Sharma, P.; McDonough, B.; Smoot, L.; Mullen, M.P.; Woolf, P.K.; Wigle, E.D.; et al. Mutations in sarcomere protein genes as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 1688–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hsiao, C.D.; Tsai, W.Y.; Horng, L.S.; Tsai, H.J. Molecular structure and developmental expression of three muscle-type troponin T genes in zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 2003, 227, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Huang, W.; Zhang, R.; Xu, X. Myofibrillogenesis in the developing zebrafish heart: A functional study of tnnt2. Dev. Biol. 2009, 331, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cao, Y.; Xu, H.; Li, R.; Gao, S.; Chen, N.; Luo, J.; Jiang, Y. Genetic Basis of Phenotypic Differences between Chinese Yunling Black Goats and Nubian Goats Revealed by Allele-Specific Expression in Their F1 Hybrids. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Goyache, F.; Perez-Pardal, L.; Fernandez, I.; Traore, A.; Menendez-Arias, N.A.; Alvarez, I. Ancient autozygous segments subject to positive selection suggest adaptive immune responses in West African cattle. Gene 2021, 803, 145899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Liang, W.; Li, Z.; Wang, P.; Fan, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xu, X.; Liu, B. Differences of immune responses between Tongcheng (Chinese local breed) and Large White pigs after artificial infection with highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virus Res. 2016, 215, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xing, J.; Xing, F.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, N.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, C.; Wen, C.; et al. Genome-wide gene expression profiles in lung tissues of pig breeds differing in resistance to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhao, Y.L.; He, J.; Wang, W.; Davies, K.E.; Nose, V.; Xiao, S. UTRN on chromosome 6q24 is mutated in multiple tumors. Oncogene 2007, 26, 6220–6228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Vizkeleti, L.; Kiss, T.; Koroknai, V.; Ecsedi, S.; Papp, O.; Szasz, I.; Adany, R.; Balazs, M. Altered integrin expression patterns shown by microarray in human cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2017, 27, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rákosy, Z.; Ecsedi, S.; Toth, R.; Vízkeleti, L.; Herandez-Vargas, H.; Lazar, V.; Emri, G.; Szatmári, I.; Herceg, Z.; Ádány, R.; et al. Integrative genomics identifies gene signature associated with melanoma ulceration. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhou, S.; Ouyang, W.; Zhang, X.; Liao, L.; Pi, X.; Yang, R.; Mei, B.; Xu, H.; Xiang, S.; Li, J. UTRN inhibits melanoma growth by suppressing p38 and JNK/c-Jun signaling pathways. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Garibyan, L.; Fisher, D.E. How Sunlight Causes Melanoma. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2010, 12, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zaidi, M.R.; Davis, S.; Noonan, F.P.; Graff-Cherry, C.; Hawley, T.S.; Walker, R.L.; Feigenbaum, L.; Fuchs, E.; Lyakh, L.; Young, H.A.; et al. Interferon-gamma links ultraviolet radiation to melanomagenesis in mice. Nature 2011, 469, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bald, T.; Quast, T.; Landsberg, J.; Rogava, M.; Glodde, N.; Lopez-Ramos, D.; Kohlmeyer, J.; Riesenberg, S.; Van den Boorn-Konijnenberg, D.; Hömig-Hölzel, C.; et al. Ultraviolet-radiation-induced inflammation promotes angiotropism and metastasis in melanoma. Nature 2014, 507, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yanai, H.; Savitsky, D.; Tamura, T.; Taniguchi, T. Regulation of the cytosolic DNA-sensing system in innate immunity: A current view. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2009, 21, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Seth, R.B.; Sun, L.; Ea, C.K.; Chen, Z.J. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF 3. Cell 2005, 122, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Keshet, Y.; Seger, R. The MAP kinase signaling cascades: A system of hundreds of components regulates a diverse array of physiological functions. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 661, 3–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sabio, G.; Davis, R.J. TNF and MAP kinase signalling pathways. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Plotnikov, A.; Zehorai, E.; Procaccia, S.; Seger, R. The MAPK cascades: Signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1813, 1619–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Guo, Y.J.; Pan, W.W.; Liu, S.B.; Shen, Z.F.; Xu, Y.; Hu, L.L. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 19, 1997–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Berridge, M.J.; Bootman, M.D.; Roderick, H.L. Calcium signalling: Dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Trebak, M.; Kinet, J.P. Calcium signalling in T cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 19, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Blitzer, R.D.; Iyengar, R.; Landau, E.M. Postsynaptic signaling networks: Cellular cogwheels underlying long-term plasticity. Biol. Psychiatry 2005, 57, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chen, Z.; Gibson, T.B.; Robinson, F.; Silvestro, L.; Pearson, G.; Xu, B.; Wright, A.; Vanderbilt, C.; Cobb, M.H. MAP kinases. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2449–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree (a) and principal component analysis (b) of Yunling goat (YR) and Nubian goat (NBY) were inferred from the RAD-seq dataset. (The blue and red colors represent Yunling goats and Nubian goats, respectively.).
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree (a) and principal component analysis (b) of Yunling goat (YR) and Nubian goat (NBY) were inferred from the RAD-seq dataset. (The blue and red colors represent Yunling goats and Nubian goats, respectively.).
Animals 12 02401 g001
Figure 2. The population structure of Yunling goat and Nubian goat ranges from K = 2 to K = 3. (Different colors are used to distinguish different components of population structure.)
Figure 2. The population structure of Yunling goat and Nubian goat ranges from K = 2 to K = 3. (Different colors are used to distinguish different components of population structure.)
Animals 12 02401 g002
Figure 3. Genome-wide distribution of FST and π (Pi) of Yunling goats vs. Nubian goats. (Different colors are used to distinguish the corresponding part of different chromosomes.)
Figure 3. Genome-wide distribution of FST and π (Pi) of Yunling goats vs. Nubian goats. (Different colors are used to distinguish the corresponding part of different chromosomes.)
Animals 12 02401 g003
Table 1. Information on the common set of selected fragments and genes identified based on FST and π methods.
Table 1. Information on the common set of selected fragments and genes identified based on FST and π methods.
ChromosomeStartEndGene DosageGene Name
chr41183600011217600001VSTM2A
chr785940001880200009ADAMTS19, KIAA1024L, CHSY3, HINT1, LYRM7, DC42SE2, RAPGEF6, FNIP1, MEIKIN
chr842100001443600007SMARCA2, DMRT2, DMRT3, DMRT1, KANK1, DOCK8, PGM5
chr8678200017001000027GFRA2, DOK2, XPO7, NPM2, FGF17, DMTN, FAM160B2, NUDT18, HR, REEP4, LGI3, SFTPC, BMP1, PHYHIP, MIR320, POLR3D, PIWIL2, SLC39A14, PPP3CC, SORBS3, PDLIM2, C8H8orf58, CCAR2, BIN3, EGR3, PEBP4, RHOBTB2
chr9681900017057000011PHACTR2, LTV1, ZC2HC1B, PLAGL1, SF3B5, STX11, UTRN, EPM2A, FBXO30, SHPRH, GRM1
chr1287130001892100000/
chr13488600015123000019HAO1, ADRA1D, SMOX, RNF24, TRNAE-UUC, PANK2, MIR103, MAVS, AP5S1, CDC25B, CENPB, SPEF1, C13H20orf27, HSPA12B, SIGLEC1, ADAM33, GFRA4, ATRN, C13H20orf194
chr16786400018072000017PPP1R12B, UBE2T, LGR6, PTPN7, ARL8A, GPR37L1, NAV1, IPO9, LMOD1,TIMM17A, RNPEP, ELF3, CSRP1, PHLDA3, TNNI1, LAD1, TNNT2
Table 2. Some important genes and their functions identified based on Fst and π methods.
Table 2. Some important genes and their functions identified based on Fst and π methods.
ChromosomeGeneGene Description or FunctionReferences
chr4VSTM2AAssociated with fat production[47]
chr8DOK2Acts as a suppressor in lung, gastric, colorectal, and ovarian cancer[48,49,50,51]
chr8DOCK8Associated with humoral immunity[43]
chr13MIR103Affects milk fat accumulation in the mammary gland of goats during lactation[46]
chr13MAVSAn essential component of virus-activated signaling pathways and is involved in immunity[42]
chr13HAO1Associated with calcium binding, alters the deposition of bone and cartilage[52]
chr13SPEF1Associated with reproduction[44]
chr13CDC25BImportant for oocyte meiosis, associated with reproduction[45]
chr16TNNT2Troponin T2, which mediates muscle contraction[53]
chr16CSRP1Associated with skeletal muscle growth[54,55]
chr16TIMM17AAssociated with breast cancer[56]
chr16LMOD1Associated with the contractility of smooth muscle cells, and its loss can lead to intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome[41]
Table 3. The GO and KEGG analyses of Yunling goat vs. Nubian goat.
Table 3. The GO and KEGG analyses of Yunling goat vs. Nubian goat.
CategoryGO IDTermGenesp-Value
BPGO:0060903Positive regulation of meiosis IPIWIL2, DMRT10.0093
BPGO:0010591Regulation of lamellipodium assemblyDMTN, BIN30.0231
BPGO:0042274Ribosomal small subunit biogenesisLTV1, ZC2HC1B0.0231
BPGO:1900025Negative regulation of substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingKANK1, DMTN0.0411
CCGO:0016010Dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complexPGM5, UTRN0.0194
CCGO:0005861Troponin complexTNNT2, TNNI10.0271
CCGO:0005737CytoplasmKANK1, DMRT1, DOCK8, XPO7, PHYHIP, SORBS3, CCAR2, PPP3CC, IPO9, BIN3, PPP1R12B, UTRN, PHLDA30.0466
MFGO:0003779Actin bindingDMTN, SPEF1, LMOD1, PHACTR2, UTRN0.0153
MFGO:0038023Signaling receptor activityATRN, GFRA2, GFRA40.0265
MFGO:0017166Vinculin bindingUTRN, SORBS30.0386
KEGGchx04623Cytosolic DNA-sensing pathwayPOLR3D, MAVS0.0260
KEGGchx04010MAPK signaling pathwayCDC25B, PPP3CC, PTPN7, FGF170.0295
KEGGchx04720Long-term potentiationPPP3CC, GRM10.0298
KEGGchx04020Calcium signaling pathwayPPP3CC, GRM1, ADRA1D0.0446
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Li, R.; Sun, J.; Li, C.; Xiao, H.; Chen, S. Genome-Wide Population Structure and Selection Signatures of Yunling Goat Based on RAD-seq. Animals 2022, 12, 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12182401

AMA Style

Chen Y, Li R, Sun J, Li C, Xiao H, Chen S. Genome-Wide Population Structure and Selection Signatures of Yunling Goat Based on RAD-seq. Animals. 2022; 12(18):2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12182401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yuming, Rong Li, Jianshu Sun, Chunqing Li, Heng Xiao, and Shanyuan Chen. 2022. "Genome-Wide Population Structure and Selection Signatures of Yunling Goat Based on RAD-seq" Animals 12, no. 18: 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12182401

APA Style

Chen, Y., Li, R., Sun, J., Li, C., Xiao, H., & Chen, S. (2022). Genome-Wide Population Structure and Selection Signatures of Yunling Goat Based on RAD-seq. Animals, 12(18), 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12182401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop