Next Article in Journal
The Quality of Five Natural, Historical Italian Cheeses Produced in Different Months: Gross Composition, Fat-Soluble Vitamins, Fatty Acids, Total Phenols, Antioxidant Capacity, and Health Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Paraclinical Changes Occurring in Dairy Cows with Spontaneous Subacute Ruminal Acidosis under Field Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
The Spatial Distribution of the House Mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, in Multi-Family Dwellings
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Use of Olkuska Sheep Milk for the Production of Symbiotic Dairy Ice Cream
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/ani12020198
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition, Fatty Acid Profile, and Lipid Quality Indices in Commercial Ripening of Cow Cheeses from Different Seasons

by
Beata Paszczyk
1,*,
Magdalena Polak-Śliwińska
1 and
Anna E. Zielak-Steciwko
2
1
Department of Commodity and Food Analysis, Faculty of Food Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-726 Olsztyn, Poland
2
Department of Cattle Breeding and Milk Production, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(2), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020198
Submission received: 19 November 2021 / Revised: 10 January 2022 / Accepted: 12 January 2022 / Published: 14 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Quality Assessment in Milk and Dairy Products)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cheese and other dairy products are important components of the diet that have a positive effect on human health. These products include substantial amounts of important nutrients, including proteins, bioactive peptides, amino acids, fat, fatty acids, and vitamins. The quantitative composition of fatty acids in milk fat changes under the influence of various factors, such as animal feeding, breed, lactation stage, individual characteristics, climatic conditions, health, age, and others. Of the above-mentioned factors, the most important influence is the diet. This work presents chemical composition and fatty acid profile, with particular emphasis on trans isomers (cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA), C18:1 and C18:2 isomers) and lipid quality indices in ripening of cow cheeses from different seasons. The first batch contained cheeses produced in winter and purchased from the market between May and June 2020. The second batch contained cheeses produced in summer and purchased from the market between November and December 2020. Results obtained show differences between summer and winter cheeses in their chemical composition, the content of lipid quality indices, and fatty acids.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare and demonstrate whether commercial rennet ripening cheeses available on the market in summer and winter differ in their chemical composition, fatty acid profile, content of cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA) acid and other trans isomers of C18:1 and C18:2 acid and whether they are characterized by different values of lipid quality assessment indices. The experimental material consisted of rennet ripening of cheeses produced from cow’s milk available in the Polish market. The first batch contained cheeses produced in winter and purchased from the market between May and June. The second batch contained cheeses produced in summer and purchased between November and December. Chemical composition was analyzed by FoodScan apparatus. The gas chromatography (GC) method was used to determine the content of fatty acids. Results obtained in the presented study indicate that the chemical composition, content of fatty acids trans isomers, and lipid quality indices varied between summer and winter cheeses. The summer cheeses were richer sources of MUFA and PUFA compared to winter cheeses. Summer cheeses were also characterized by lower content of SFA, higher content n − 3, lower n − 6/n − 3 ratio, and higher content of DFA. Higher contents of CLA and trans C18:1 and C18:2 were found in summer cheeses.

1. Introduction

The production of cheese and cottage cheese is the oldest milk processing method mastered by man and is the foundation for the development of the modern dairy industry. The cheese production in Poland increased over the last decade and was accompanied by an enlargement of cheese variety. Polish cheese producers have introduced many new types of cheese to the market that have not been manufactured in the country so far, which clearly shows changes in consumption patterns and consumer preferences [1,2]. In Poland, 3134.4 million liters of drinking milk were produced between January and November 2020, which was 6.9% more than in the same period of 2019. However, during the 11 months of 2020, 310.1 thousand tons of rennet ripened cheese were produced, which was 2.6% less than in 2019 [3]. The nutritional value of cheeses depends mostly on milk characteristics and the production technology. The technological parameters used in cheese production determine the unique and distinct nutritional properties of each cheese type. Substantial amounts of important nutrients, including proteins, bioactive peptides, amino acids, fat, fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals can be found in cheeses [4]. Milk fat is considered to be the most complex fat in the human diet as there are more than 400 distinct fatty acids (FA) [5]. SFAs are the predominant class of fatty acids in milk fat. This group of fatty acids includes: short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), medium and long-chain fatty acids, as well as odd fatty acids (OCFA) and branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA, iso- and anteiso) [5,6]. Dietary fatty acids may have different effects on human health [7,8]. Saturated fatty acids (SFA), mainly lauric (C12:0), myristic (C14:0), and palmitic (C16:0) acids, may show adverse effects [9,10,11]. Branched-chain fatty acids have anti-tumor effects and improve pancreatic β-cell function [12,13]. BCFA originate from the cell membranes of rumen bacteria that dairy and meat products from ruminants contain and those acids are a unique source of these fatty acids [14]. Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are biologically beneficial to human health [10,15]. The best source of natural trans fatty acids, such as: vaccenic acid (trans11 C18:1, VA) and conjugated linoleic acid (cis9trans11 C18:2; CLA) in milk fat, which exhibit favorable properties compared to artificial trans fatty acids in partially hydrogenated oils [16]. Trans11 acid has anti-tumor and anti-atherosclerotic effects [17]. According to literature data [18,19,20,21,22] cis9trans11 C18:2 acid has a number of health-promoting properties, including anti-carcinogenic, antiatherosclerotic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Anti-cancer and anti-atherosclerotic properties are attributed to cis9 C18:1 acid and cis9cis12cis15 C18:3 acid [10,23]. n − 3 PUFAs prevent heart disease and improve the immune response. The consumption of n − 6 and n − 3 acids has a positive effect on human health [15]. Milk fat is also a rich source of butyric acid (C4:0), which has beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal tract and supports treatments of chronic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract associated with inflammation [24,25].
The quantitative composition of fatty acids in milk fat changes under the influence of various factors, such as: animal feeding, breed, lactation stage, individual characteristics, climatic conditions, health, age, and others [26,27,28,29,30]. Of the factors mentioned, animal feeding has the greatest influence, which includes pasture feeding, consumption of grass, hay, or silage [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Fat from milk obtained in the green feed season contains much more C18 acids, mainly C18:1 acid, and much less palmitic and myristic acid than the one obtained in the cowshed feeding season [39,40]. Milk fat from the pasture period of cow’s feeding is also characterized by a higher content of cis9trans11 C18:2 conjugated linoleic acid and C18:1 and C18:2 trans isomers [30,34,38]. A study conducted by Żegarska et al. [38] indicated that the proportion of cis9trans11 C18:2 acid in fat from the winter period ranged between 0.32% to 0.52% of the total fatty acids composition, whereas in fat from the summer period, it was from 1.06% to 1.76%. The chemical composition and fatty acid composition of cheese may differ from that of milk. Cheese composition depends on the milk’s microbiological and chemical composition, the cheesemaking technology, ripening time, and cheese factory conditions [41,42,43]. Since milk fat and protein are main constituents of cheese, product quality is heavily influenced by their concentrations in milk. The main component determining the quality of milk used for cheese production is the protein content. Milk high in protein, especially casein, results in high yield and good quality cheese products. The fat content is important as well, but especially the ratio of protein or casein content to it is of significance. The quality of cheese, its caloric and nutritional value, physical properties, and chemical composition depends, to a large extent, on the fat content. The fat content in milk can vary within wide limits, from 2.5% to 5% or sometimes even more. The content of protein in the milk varies to a lesser extent in comparison to milk fat content. The biggest fraction within protein content is covered by casein, with is about 3% of all proteins found in milk [44]. Changes in the concentrations of protein and fat in milk significantly influence the composition of the cheese and its yield. Milk protein and fat contents vary greatly according to species, breed, season, health status, stage of lactation, and animal diet [10,33,45]. The type of starter culture used might modify the total content of protein, fat, ash, and fatty acids profile of the cheese, due to the different activity and specificity of proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes [46]. Because of dehydration, protein and fat contents increase during ripening time [4,46,47]. According to literature data [48,49,50,51,52,53], the profile of fatty acids, including the content of CLA in cheeses and fermented drinks, may be influenced by the conditions used in technological processes, the additives used, the activity of the added starter cultures, and ripening time. Rutkowska et al. [54], Zeppa et al. [55], and Serrapica et al. [56] demonstrated that cheeses from summer season had higher unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) content and lower content of saturated fatty acids (SFA) compared to cheeses from winter season.
The aim of the study was to compare and demonstrate whether commercial rennet ripening of cheeses available on the market in summer and winter differ in their chemical composition, fatty acid profile, content of cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA) acid, and other trans isomers of C18:1 and C18:2 acid and whether they are characterized by different values of lipid quality assessment indices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cheeses Samples

To make cheese, you need milk, rennet, microorganisms, and salt. The main stages of the technological process of producing rennet ripened cheeses are: pasteurization and normalization of milk, addition of leaven from pure cultures and calcium chloride, mixing and heating, rennet addition, coagulation and cutting, shaping and pressing of cheese, salting in brine, dripping, and maturation [57]. The quantitative and qualitative diversification of individual ingredients, followed by modifications to the stages of the production process, have led to the development of many types of cheese. Commercial rennet ripened cheeses (Gouda, Edamski, Morski, Edam, Kasztelański, Podlaski) produced from cow’s milk available in the Polish market were used as experimental material. Taking into account the cheese production process, including the ripening time and the shelf-life specified by the manufacturer on the packaging, the analyzed cheeses were divided into two batches. The first batch (labeled as winter cheeses; n = 20) contained cheeses produced in winter and purchased from the market between May and June 2020. The second batch, the same cheeses from the same producers (labeled as summer cheeses; n = 20), contained cheeses produced in summer and purchased from the market between November and December 2020. The products were bought from stores in Olsztyn, Poland. All samples were analyzed in duplicate.

2.2. Analytical Methods

2.2.1. Chemical Composition

Concentration of fat, protein, water and dry matter in cheese samples were analyzed by FoodScan apparatus (Foss, Hilleroed, Denmark).

2.2.2. Lipid Extraction

Folch’s method was used for fat extraction from cheeses [58].

2.2.3. Preparation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters

Methyl esters were prepared using the IDF method (ISO 15884:2002) [59]. To each fat sample, N-hexane and 2 M KOH in methanol were added and the mixtures were shaken. In the next step, sodium hydrogen sulphate (NaHSO4) was added and the mixtures were centrifuged (3000 min−1). The top layer of the prepared methyl esters was collected for chromatographic analysis.

2.2.4. Gas Chromatography (GC) Analysis

The methyl esters were analyzed by the GC method. Chromatographic separation was performed using Hewlett Packard 6890 gas chromatography (Münster, Germany) with a flame ionization detector (FID) and 100 m capillary column (Chrompack, Middelburg, The Netherlands) and internal diameter 0.25 mm. The liquid phase was CP Sil 88 and film thickness was 0.20 μm. The analysis was carried out in the following conditions: column temperature from 60 °C (for 1 min) to 180 °C (Δt = 5 °C/min), detector temperature 250 °C, injector temperature was 225 °C, helium was carrier gas (gas flow 1.5 mL/min). Sample injection volume was 0.4 μL (split mode 50:1). Identification of fatty acids was carried out based on the comparison of their retention time with the retention time of methyl esters of fatty acids of reference milk fat (BCR Reference Materials) of CRM 164 symbol and literature data [60,61,62,63]. The positional trans isomers of C18:1 were identified using the standards of methyl esters for these isomers (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA and Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The ratio of their peak area to the total area of all identified acids (% mass fraction) helped with calculations of the proportions of the individual acids.

2.2.5. The Lipid Quality Indices

The following formulas were used to determine Lipid Quality Indices on the basis of fatty acid composition:
Index of Atherogenicity (AI)—according to Ulbricht and Southgate [11] and Osmari et al. [64]:
AI = (C12:0 + (4 × C14:0) + C16:0)/(n − 3 PUFA + n − 6 PUFA + MUFA)
Index of Thrombogenicity (TI)—according to Ulbricht and Southgate [11] and Osmari et al. [64]:
TI = (C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0)/((0.5 × C18:1) + (0.5 × sum of other MUFA) + 0.5 × n − 6 PUFA) + (3 × n − 3 PUFA) + n − 3 PUFA/n − 6 PUFA))
Hypocholesterolaemic fatty acids (DFA)—according to Medeiros et al. [65]:
DFA = UFA + C18:0
Hypercholesterolaemic fatty acids (OFA):
OFA = C12:0 + C14:0 + C16:0
Hypocholesterolaemic/hypercholesterolaemic ratio (HH)—according to Ivanova and Hadzhinikolova [66]:
H/H = (C18:1n − 9 + C18:2n − 6 + C18:3n − 3)/(C12:0 + C14:0 + C16:0)

2.2.6. Assessment of the Coverage of Daily Requirements for Selected Nutrients According to National Nutrition Standards

Based on per capita cheese intake data compiled by the CSO in 2019 and data on fat intake estimated based on the Reference Intake Value (RI) and protein intake based on the recommended Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) intake for selected population groups presented in the Nutrition Standards for the Polish population by the Institute of Food and Nutrition, the % coverage of the daily requirement for these nutrients was calculated [67,68].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

STATISTICA ver. 13.1 software (Statsoft, Kraków, Poland) was applied to perform the statistical analysis [69]. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Duncan’s test was used to find means that were significantly different from each other. Statistically significant differences were accepted at p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Composition

The mean content of fat and water for summer and winter cheeses was observed at a similar level (Figure 1). Winter cheeses were characterized by significantly higher (p < 0.05) content of protein than summer cheeses. The composition and quality of cheese are influenced by various factors: the microbiological and chemical composition of milk, the technology of cheese making, the time and conditions of maturation [70,71,72]. Milk protein and fat content can vary due to different species, breed, season, health status, stage of lactation, and animal diet [4,47,73]. In addition, the type of starter culture used in cheese manufacture might modify the total content of protein, fat, ash, and fatty acids profile due to different activity and specificity of proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes [46,74]. The protein and fat content increase during ripening time, which can be caused by partial evaporation of water [4,46].
Protein is an essential macronutrient in the human diet. It is recognised as a key dietary component of human body’s requirements considering its complex metabolic transformations [67]. This is due to the fact that protein metabolism is determined by many factors. Proteins are necessary structural and functional components of every cell in the human body, undergoing energy metabolism as well as intensive interactions with other nutrients that are supplied with food. Moreover, these molecules are essential for the development and growth processes of young organisms, also acting as regulators of gene expression [67]. Proteins are important nutrient because they provide protein nitrogen and specific types of amino acids [67]. Natural sources of proteins and amino acids are raw materials or food products, of which animal products such as dairy (milk, cheese, eggs) and meat, including fish and poultry (except connective tissue proteins low in tryptophan), are complete sources of protein. The main factors influencing human protein requirements are body energy balance, physiological status, age, health status, body weight, physical activity [67,75,76,77]. In the 2017 Nutrition Standards for the Polish population [46], reference intake ranges (RI) were defined for fat and carbohydrates. In contrast, standards for protein and other nutrients were set at levels of average intake EAR and recommended intake RDA, or adequate intake AI. The RDA is the level of nutrient intake that covers the needs of almost all people in a given group. The reference intake (reference macronutrient intake ranges, RI) is the level of macronutrient intake expressed as a percentage of energy requirements. It indicates what range of the percentage of energy from a given macronutrient ensures the maintenance of good health and is associated with a low risk of developing selected chronic diseases [67]. The RDA level (representing the needs of 97–98% of the population, calculated as EAR + 2SD) is intended for intake planning or population-level nutritional goal planning. The recommended daily allowance (RDA) for protein is the amount, based on nitrogen balance (physiological), needed to meet basic nutritional (vital) needs for this component. For adults, it is 0.9 g/kg body weight/day; however, people over 65 years of age are currently advised to consume at least 1 g/kg body weight of protein and to increase their intake in the presence of symptoms of malnutrition or chronic disease to at least 1.2 g/kg body weight (and in justified cases of disease even to 1.5 g/kg body weight/day).
For people with increased physical activity, athletes, an intake of 1.4–2 g/kg body weight/day is recommended. In a sense, this is the minimum amount that needs to be consumed each day in order to keep the body’s immunity at the right level and not get sick. It is assumed that the average of 7 or 10 days, should be within the range of the established daily norm. The correct fulfilment of a person’s protein requirements does not consist of consuming the required amount of protein each day. The average protein intake should not be less than the level of the EAR standard or the lower limit of % energy from protein, which means that it will then be in accordance with the recommendations of Jarosz et al. [67]. In Poland in 2019, the monthly consumption of cheese per urban resident was 1.0 kg, while per rural resident, it was 0.8 kg [68]. Taking into account the data on cheese consumption per capita compiled by the CSO in 2019 and the protein intake data based on the recommended RDA intake for selected population groups presented in the Nutrition Standards for the Polish population by the Institute of Food and Nutrition and the results of protein determinations in the studied cheese samples, the % coverage of the daily requirement for this component was calculated. It was found that the indicated level of intake covered the recommended protein intake in 15.56% for women over 19 years of age and in 13.33% for men over 19 years of age when consuming winter cheeses (Table 1) and in 14.44% for women over 19 years of age and in 12.22% for men over 19 years of age when consuming summer cheeses, whereas for pregnant and lactating women from 8.97% to 10.83% and from 9.66% to 11.67%, respectively.
Table 2 shows the estimated fat intake per capita in Poland based on cheese consumption data in 2019 [54]. Fat intake was estimated based on the Reference Intake (RI) presented in the Nutrition Standards for the Polish Population by the Food and Nutrition Institute [67]. The fat intake standards were developed based on the recommendations of Polish scientific societies and updated opinions of EFSA and FAO/WHO [67]. In developing the standards, the assumption was made that 9 kcal corresponds to one gram of fat [78]. Considering the physiological functions of fats, their insufficient dietary supply may lead to an increased risk of deficiency of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K), especially among vegetarians [79,80] and central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction, since fat is an important component of this system (including the brain) and fatty acids are the most key components of this organ. Considering the reference intake value (RI), the cheeses studied can be an important source of fat in the daily diet. Data on dietary intake of cheeses in the population in Poland may cover up to about 12% of the reference intake value for fat in the group of women over 19 years of age, while in the group of men with a higher fat requirement, from 7.76 to 8.53% of the RI. In the diets of pregnant and lactating women, whose fat requirements are significant, cheeses provide varying degrees of RI coverage from 9.50% to 11.15% for summer cheeses and from 9.71% to 11.41% for winter cheeses.

3.2. Fatty Acids Profile and Lipid Quality Indices in Cheese Fat

In the presented study, saturated fatty acids (SFA) predominated in all examined cheeses. A significantly lower (p < 0.05) content of these acids (58.61 ± 1.12%) was found in cheeses from the summer period than in these from the winter period (62.30 ± 0.84%). In addition, all cheese samples contained major SFA in the form of palmitic acid, myristic acid, and stearic acid (Table 3).
Furthermore, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) content was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in summer than winter cheeses (Table 4). In both groups, oleic acid (cis9 C18:1) was the major MUFA (Table 3). Whereas linoleic acid (C18:2) and linolenic acid (C18:3) were found to be the major PUFA (Table 3). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) content did not differ significantly between summer and winter cheeses (Table 4). The summer cheeses had significantly higher (p < 0.05) contents of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) compared to winter cheeses. The contents of odd-chain fatty acids (OCFA) in the analyzed cheeses were at a similar level (Table 4). Research conducted by Prandini et al. [81] on cheeses made from cow’s milk indicated that SFA content ranged from 65.23% to 68.52%, MUFA content varied from 27.90% to 31.19%, and PUFA content ranged from 3.48% to 4.17%. Similar results were obtained by Paszczyk and Łuczyńska [82], who demonstrated that content of MUFA and PUFA in commercial cheeses, made from cow’s milk, purchased from September to December was 27.92% and 3.31%, respectively.
In the presented study, n − 3 PUFA content was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in summer cheeses than winter cheeses, whereas the content of n − 6 PUFA was at similar level (Table 4). The values of lipid quality indexes varied between summer and winter cheeses (Table 4). Summer cheeses contained significantly more (p < 0.05) desirable hypocholesterolemic fatty acids (DFAs) and significantly less (p < 0.05) hypercholesterolemic fatty acids (OFA). Furthermore, the AI and TI indexes were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in winter cheeses. The AI and TI indexes are believed to have an impact on the risk of cardiovascular diseases [11]. The higher values of these indices higher risk of certain diseases. Dairy products with lower AI values can reduce levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in human plasma [66]. A significantly higher (p < 0.05) H/H content was found in summer cheeses than in winter cheeses. Moreover, summer cheeses had more favorable ratio of n − 6 to n − 3 acids (3.04) compared to winter cheeses (4.52), which may indicate better health-promoting properties of summer cheeses. Proportions of fatty acids specific groups in dairy products are of special importance from a nutritional perspective. Excessive amounts of n − 6 PUFA and very high n − 6/n − 3 ratio, which can be typically found in today’s Western diets, promote the pathogenesis of many diseases, whereas increased levels of n − 3 PUFA (a low n − 6/n − 3 ratio) exert suppressive effects [83,84,85]. Similar results were obtained by Hirigoyen et al. for the n − 6/n − 3 ratio in the cheeses [86]. The authors demonstrated that this ratio in “Colonia” cheeses produced from cow’s milk in spring was 4.47 and 3.29 in cheeses produced in autumn.

3.3. The Content of CLA and Trans C18:1 and Trans C18:2 Fatty Acids in Cheese

The content of cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA) and total content of C18:1 and C18:2 trans isomers in summer and winter cheeses are presented on Figure 2. The conducted analyses indicated that summer cheeses had significantly higher (p < 0.05) content of CLA than winter cheeses (0.88% and 0.44%, respectively).
Dairy products, such as milk, cheese, and yogurt are the principal natural sources of CLA in the human diet. The term conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) refers to a group of positional and geometric isomers of linoleic acid characterized by the presence of two conjugated double bonds. The main isomer in dairy products is rumenic acid, cis9trans11 CLA, which represents 75 to over 90% of total CLA in milk fat [87]. CLA is an intermediate in the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid in the rumen, but its main source is endogenous synthesis from trans 11 C18:1 acid by Δ9-desaturase [88]. According to Żegarska et al. [89], the content of CLA in milk fat ranged from 0.32% to 0.52% in the winter season and from 1.06% to 1.76% in the pasture period. Several studies have also demonstrated a large variation of CLA content in cheese. Fritsche and Steinhart [90] analyzed German cheese made from cow’s milk, and found that CLA content in total fatty acid composition varied from 0.40% to 1.70%. Donmez et al. [91] indicated that CLA content in fat from Turkish cheeses ranged from 0.44 to 1.04 g/100 g. According to Grega et al. [92], CLA content in commercial cheeses ranged from 0.20% to 0.95% in the winter season and from 0.61% to 1.57% in the summer season. Żegarska et al. [89] observed that in hard commercial cheeses, purchased in February and March, CLA content in total fatty acid composition ranged from 0.48% to 1.68%, while cheeses bought in October and November had from 0.97% to 1.46%. In commercial cheeses bought in the period from November to December analyzed by Paszczyk and Łuczyńska [82], the CLA content varied from 0.46% to 0.85% of total fatty acids.
In the group of trans C18:1 isomers, the trans 11 isomer is the dominant one; it accounts for about 40–50% in total C18:1 trans fatty acids [93]. The animal feeding system can influence the content of this isomer in milk fat [94,95]. In the presented study, the total content of C18:1 and C18:2 trans isomers in summer cheeses was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to winter cheeses (Figure 2). Obtained results are in consistence with Żegarska et al. [38], who demonstrated that trans C18:1 isomers ranged from 3.57% to 5.37%, and from 1.26% to 1.84% in summer and winter milk, respectively. Moreover, research conducted on commercial cheeses by Żegarska et al. [89], purchased in February and March, also demonstrated that total content of trans C18:1 isomers ranged from 1.65% to 4.42% in total fatty acids composition. Whereas, the proportion of trans C18:1 isomers in cheeses purchase from October and November varied from 4.14% to 4.69%. Authors also showed that content of trans C18:2 isomers in cheeses purchased from February to March ranged from 0.44% to 1.17%, and from 0.96% to 1.11% in cheeses bought from October to November, which is consistent with the presented study. In addition, Paszczyk and Łuczyńska [82] indicated that total content of C18:1 and C18:2 trans isomers, in Polish cheeses made from cow’s milk (purchased from September to December), ranged from 2.58% to 3.27% and trans C18:2 ranged from 0.50% to 0.75% in total fatty acids composition.

4. Conclusions

Interest in cheeses, and the demands of increasingly aware consumers mean that new varieties of cheese are constantly being supplied to the market. Consumers are paying more and more attention to the composition of the food they eat, while at the same time looking for products that are as natural as possible. Animal feeding influences the quality and chemical composition of milk, and thus the quality and composition of cheeses. Therefore the evaluation of cheese properties is becoming more and more important. According to the obtained results, the chemical composition, content of fatty acids, CLA, other trans isomers, and lipid quality indices varied in summer and winter cheeses. Winter cheeses were characterized as a better source of protein than summer cheeses and might be a better choice, meeting daily protein requirements of different population groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.P.; methodology, B.P.; validation, B.P. and M.P.-Ś.; formal analysis, B.P.; investigation, B.P.; data curation, B.P.; writing—original draft preparation, B.P. and M.P.-Ś.; writing—review and editing, B.P., M.P.-Ś., B.P. and M.P.-Ś.; supervision, A.E.Z.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Project financially supported by the Minister of Education and Science under the program entitled “Regional Initiative of Excellence” for the years 2019–2022, Project No. 010/RID/2018/19, amount of funding 12.000.000 PLN.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Piekut, M. Production and consumption of cheese in Poland. Dairy Rev. 2012, 7, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  2. Szajner, P. Polish dairy products supply—Demand. Food Ind. 2013, 4, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Polish Federation of Cattle Breeders and Milk Producers. Milk Market Report I/2021. 2021. Available online: https://pfhb.pl/fileadmin/aktualnosci/2021/rynek_mleka/Raport_Rynek_mleka_I2021_r.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2021).
  4. Walther, B.; Schmid, A.; Sieber, R.; Wehrmüller, K. Cheese in nutrition and health. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2008, 88, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Jensen, R.G. The composition of bovine milk lipids: January 1995 to December 2000. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 295–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Månsson, H.L. Fatty acids in bovine milk fat. Food Nutr. Res. 2008, 52, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Simopoulos, A.P. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed. Pharm. 2002, 56, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bernard, L.; Bonnet, M.; Delavaud, C.; Delosiére, M.; Ferlay, A.; Fougére, H.; Graulet, B. Milk fat globule in ruminant: Major and minor compounds, nutritional regulation and differences among species. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2018, 102, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parodi, P.W. Has the association between saturated fatty acids, serum cholesterol and coronary heart disease been over emphasized? Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haug, A.; Høstmark, A.T.; Harstad, O.M. Bovine milk in human nutrition—A review. Lipids Health Dis. 2007, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ulbricht, T.L.V.; Southgate, D.A.T. Coronary heart disease: Seven dietary factors. Lancet 1991, 338, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wongtangtintharn, S.; Oku, H.; Iwasaki, H.; Toda, T. Effect of branched-chain fatty acids on fatty acid biosynthesis of human breast cancer cells. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2004, 50, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Adamska, A.; Rutkowska, J. Odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk fat—Characteristic and health properties. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 2014, 68, 998–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Taormina, V.M.; Unger, A.L.; Schiksnis, M.R.; Torres-Gonzalez, M.; Kraft, J. Branched-Chain fatty acids—An underexplored class of dairy-derived fatty acids. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Arnould, V.M.-R.; Soyeurt, H. Genetic variability of milk fatty acids. J. Appl. Genet. 2009, 50, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Summer, A.; Formaggioni, P.; Franceschi, P.; Frangia, F.D.; Righi, F.; Malacarne, M. Cheese as functionalfood: The example of parmigiano reggiano and grana padano. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2017, 55, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lim, J.-N.; Oh, J.-J.; Wang, T.; Lee, J.-S.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Lee, H.-G. Trans-11 18:1 vaccenic acid (TVA) has a direct anti-carcinogenic effect on MCF-7 human mammary adenocarcinoma cells. Nutrients 2014, 6, 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Akalln, A.S.; Tokusoglu, Ö. A potential Anticarcinogenic Agent: Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). Pak. J. Nutr. 2003, 2, 109–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Parodi, P.W. Anti-cancer agents in milkfat. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 2003, 58, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
  20. Aydin, R. Conjugated linoleic acid: Structure, sources and biological properties. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2005, 29, 189–195. [Google Scholar]
  21. Park, Y. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA): Good or bad trans fat? J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, S4–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kee, J.-I.; Ganesan, P.; Kwak, H.-S. Bioactive conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in milk. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2010, 30, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Williams, C.M. Dietary fatty acids and human health. Ann. Zootech. 2000, 49, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gómez-Cortés, P.; Juárez, M.; Angel de la Fuente, M. Milk fat acids and potential health benefits: An update vision. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 81, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Czajkowska, A.; Szponar, B. Short chain fatty acids (SCFA), the products of gut bacteria metabolism and their role in the host. Postęp. Hig. Med. Doswiadczalnej. 2018, 72, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Soyeurt, H.; Dardenne, P.; Gillon, A.; Croquet, C.; Vanderick, S.; Mayeres, P.; Bertozzi, C.; Gengler, N. Variation in fatty acid contents of milk and milk fat within and across breeds. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 4858–4865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Capuano, E.; Gravink, R.; Boerrigter-Eenling, R.; van Ruth, S.M. Fatty acid and triglycerides profiling of retail organic, conventional and pasture milk: Implications for health and authenticity. Int. Dairy J. 2015, 42, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chilliard, Y.; Ferlay, A.; Mansbridge, R.M.; Doreau, M. Ruminant milk fat plasticity: Nutritional control of saturated, polyunsaturated, trans and conjugated fatty acids. Ann. Zootechnol. 2000, 49, 181–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hanuš, O.; Krížová, L.; Samková, E.; Špička, J.; Kučera, J.; Klimešová, M.; Roubal, P.; Jedelská, R. The effect of cattle bread, season and type of diet on the fatty acid profile of raw milk. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2016, 59, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kelsey, J.A.; Corl, B.A.; Collier, R.J.; Bauman, D.E. The effect of breed, parity and stage of lactation on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in milk fat from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86, 2588–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ellis, K.A.; Innocent, G.; Grove-White, D.; Cripps, P.; Mclean, W.G.; Howard, C.V.; Mihm, M. Comparing the fatty acid composition of organic and conventional milk. J. Dairy Sc. 2006, 89, 1938–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zunong, M.; Hanada, M.; Aibibula, Y.; Okamato, M.; Tanaka, K. Variations in conjugated linoleic acid concentrations in cow‘s milk, depending on feeding systems in different seasons. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 21, 1466–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kuczyńska, B.; Nałęcz-Tarwacka, T.; Puppel, K.; Gołębiewski, M.; Grodzki, H.; Slósarz, J. The content of bioactive components in milk depending on cow feeding model in certified ecological farms. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 2011, 56, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lipiński, K.; Stasiewicz, M.; Rafałowski, R.; Kaliniewicz, J.; Purwin, C. Effect of milk production season on profile of fatty acids in milk fat. Żywność Nauka Technol. Jakość 2012, 1, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Frelich, J.; Šlachta, M.; Hanuš, O.; Špička, J.; Samková, E.; Węglarz, A.; Zapletal, P. Seasonal variation in fatty acid composition of cow milk in relation to the feeding system. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2012, 30, 219–229. [Google Scholar]
  36. Radkowska, I. Effect of housing system and diet on the fatty acid, vitamin and macronutrient content of milk from holstein-friesian cows. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 2013, 40, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
  37. Żegarska, Z.; Paszczyk, B.; Borejszo, Z. Trans fatty acids in milk fat. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 1996, 5/46, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  38. Żegarska, Z.; Paszczyk, B.; Rafałowski, R.; Borejszo, Z. Annual changes in the content of unsaturated fatty acids with 18 carbon atoms, including cis9,trans11 C18:2 (CLA) acid, in milk fat. Pol. J. Nutr. Sci. 2006, 15/56, 409–414. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chilliard, Y.; Ferlay, A. Dietary lipids and forages interactions on cow and goat milk fatty acid composition and sensory properties. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2004, 44, 467–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Uzun, P.; Masucci, F.; Serrapica, F.; Napolitano, F.; Braghieri, A.; Romano, R.; Manzo, N.; Esposito, G.; Di Francia, A. The inclusion of fresh forage in the lactating buffalo diet affects fatty acid and sensory profile of mozzarella cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 6752–6761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lucas, A.; Rock, E.; Chamba, J.-F.; Verdier-Metz, I.; Brachet, P.; Coulon, J.-B. Respective effects of milk composition and the cheese-making process on cheese compositional variability in components of nutritional interest. Lait 2006, 86, 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bittante, G.; Cipolat-Gotet, C.; Malchiodi, F.; Sturaro, E.; Tagliapietra, F.; Schiavon, S.; Cecchinato, A. Effect of dairy farming system, herd, season, parity, and days in milk on modeling of the coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis of bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 98, 2759–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Franceschi, P.; Malacarne, M.; Formaggioni, P.; Faccia, M.; Summer, A. Quantification of the Effect of the Cattle Breed on Milk Cheese Yield: Comparison between Italian Brown Swiss and Italian Friesian. Animals 2020, 10, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bojanić Rašović, M.; Nikolić, N.; Martinović, A.; Katić, V.; Rašović, R.; Walcer, M.; Domig, K. Correlation between protein to fat ratio of milk and chemical parameters and the yield of semi-hard cheese. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2013, 29, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bland, J.H.; Grandison, A.S.; Fagan, C.C. The effect of blending Jersey and Holstein- Friesian milk on composition and coagulation properties. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2015, 68, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Taboada, N.; Van Nieuwenhove, C.; Alzogaray, S.L.; Medina, R. Influence of autochthonous cultures on fatty acid composition, esterase activity and sensory profile of Argentinean goat cheeses. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 40, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Manuelian, C.L.; Currò, S.; Penasa, M.; Cassandro, M.; De Marchi, M. Characterization of major and trace minerals, fatty acid composition, and cholesterol content of protected designation of origin cheeses. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 3384–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lin, T.Y. Conjugated linoleic acid concentration as affected by lactic cultures and additives. Food Chem. 2000, 69, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Murtaza, M.A.; Huma, N.; Hayat, Z.; Murtaza, M.S.; Meraj, A. Cheddar cheese from cow milk with elevated conjugated linoleic acid levels. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2014, 2, 506–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kim, J.H.; Kwon, O.J.; Choi, N.J.; Oh, S.J.; Jeong, H.Y.; Song, M.K.; Jeong, I.; Kim, Y.J. Variations in conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) content of processed cheese by lactation time, feeding regimen, and ripening. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 3235–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Prandini, A.; SigoLo, S.; Piva, G. A comparative study of fatty acid composition and CLA concentration in commercial cheeses. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011, 24, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sieber, R.; Collomb, M.; Aeschlimann, A.; Jelen, P.; Eyer, H. Impact of microbial cultures on conjugated linoleic acid in dairy products—A review. Int. Dairy J. 2004, 14, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, Y.J.; Liu, R.H. Increase of conjugated linoleic acid content in milk by fermentation with lactic acid bacteria. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1731–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rutkowska, J.; Sadowska, A.; Tabaszewska, M.; Stołyhwo, A. Fatty acid composition of hard cheeses from north, eastern and central region of Poland. Bromatol. Chem. Toksykol. 2009, 42, 263–269. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zeppa, G.; Giordano, M.; Gerbi, V.; Arlorio, M. Fatty acid composition of Piedmont “Ossolano” cheese. Lait 2003, 82, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Serrapica, F.; Masucci, F.; Di Francia, A.; Napolitano, F.; Braghieri, A.; Esposito, G.; Romano, R. Seasonal variation of chemical composition, fatty acid profile, and sensory properties of a Mountain Pecorino Cheese. Foods 2020, 9, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wangin, J. Manufacture of Rennet Ripening Cheeses; LACPRES Publishing House: Warsaw, Poland, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  58. Christie, W.W. (Ed.) The isolation of lipids from tissues. Recommended Procedures. Chloroform-methanol (2:1,v/v) extraction and “Folch” wash. In Lipid Analysis. Isolation, Separation, Identification and Structural Analysis of Lipids; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; Tokyo, Japan; Sydney, Australia; Braunschweig, Germany, 1973; pp. 39–40. [Google Scholar]
  59. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15884:2002 (IDF 182:2002). Milkfat: Preparation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  60. Roach, J.A.G.; Mossoba, M.M.; Yurawecz, M.P.; Kramer, J.K.G. Chromatographic separation and identification of conjugated linoleic acid isomers. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 465, 207–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kramer, J.K.G.; Cruz-Hermantez, C.; Deng, Z.; Zhou, J.; Jahreis, G.; Dugan, M.E.R. Analysis of conjugated linoleic acid and trans 18:1 isomers in syntetic and animal products. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 1137S–1145S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. LeDoux, M.; Chardigny, J.-M.; Darbois, M.; Soustre, Y.; Sébédio, J.-L.; Laloux, L. Fatty acid composition of French butters, with special emphasis on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2005, 18, 409–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Contarini, G.; Povolo, M.; Pelizzola, V.; Monti, L.; Lercker, G. Interlaboratory evaluation of milk fatty acid composition by using different GC operating conditions. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2013, 32, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Osmari, E.K.; Cecato, U.; Macedo, F.A.F.; Souza, N.E. Nutritional quality indices of milk fat from goats on diets supplemented with different roughages. Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 98, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Medeiros, E.; Queiroga, R.; Oliveira, M.; Medeiros, A.; Sabedot, M.; Bomfim, M.; Madruga, M. Fatty Acid Profile of Cheese from Dairy Goats Fed a Diet Enriched with Castor, Sesame and Faveleira Vegetable Oils. Molecules 2014, 19, 992–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ivanova, A.; Hadzhinikolova, L. Evaluation of nutritional quality of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) lipidsthrough fatty acid ratios and lipid indices. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 21, 180–185. [Google Scholar]
  67. Jarosz, M.; Rychlik, E.; Cichocka, A.; Białkowska, M. Nutrition Standards for the Polish Population; Jarosz, M., Ed.; Institute of Food and Nutrition: Warsaw, Poland, 2020; pp. 21–39. [Google Scholar]
  68. CSO. Situation of Households in 2019 in the Light of the Results of the Household Budget Survey; CSO: Bergerac, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  69. Statsoft. STATISTIC, Version 13.1 Software; Statsoft: Kraków, Poland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  70. De Marchi, M.; Bittante, G.; Dal Zotto, R.; Dalvit, C.; Cassandro, M. Effect of Holstein Friesian and Brown Swiss breeds on quality of milk and cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 4092–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Formaggioni, P.; Summer, A.; Malacarne, M.; Franceschi, P.; Mucchetti, G. Italian and Italian-style hard cooked cheeses: Predictive formulas for Parmigiano-Reggiano 24-h cheese yield. Int. Dairy J. 2015, 51, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Uzun, P.; Serrapica, F.; Masucci, F.; Assunta, B.C.M.; Yildiz, H.; Grasso, F.; Di Francia, A. Diversity of traditional Caciocavallo cheeses produced in Italy. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2019, 73, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Esposito, G.; Masucci, F.; Napolitano, F.; Braghieri, A.; Romano, R.; Manzo, N.; Di Francia, A. Fatty acid and sensory profiles of Caciocavallo cheese as affected by management system. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 1918–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Lešić, T.; Pleadin, J.; Krešić, G.; Vahčić, N.; Markov, K.; Vrdoljak, M.; Frece, J. Chemical and fatty acid composition of cow and sheep milk cheeses in a lamb skin sack. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 46, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientifc opinion on Dietary Reference Values for protein. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Dietary Reference Values for Nutrients; Summary Report, EFSA Supporting Publication; EFSA (European Food Safety Authority): Parma, Italy, 2017; p. e15121. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization/United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU). Protein and Amino Acids Requirements in Human Nutrition; Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation; WHO Technical Report Series 935; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; p. 2011.
  78. Arnett Tymoczko, J.L.; Berg, J.M.; Stryer, L. Biochemistry; Short Course; Scientific Publishers PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2013; pp. 193–206. [Google Scholar]
  79. Maldonado, G.E.; Gallego-Narbón, A.; Vaquero, M.P. Are vegetarian diets nutritionally adequate? A revision of the scientific evidence. Nutr. Hosp. 2019, 36, 950–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Rocha, J.P.; Laster, J.; Parag, B.; Shah, N.U. Multiple Health Benefits and Minimal Risks Associated with Vegetarian Diets. Curr Nutr. Rep. 2019, 8, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Prandini, A.; Sigolo, S.; Tansini, G.; Brogna, N.; Piva, G. Different level of conjugated linolei acid (CLA) in dairy products from Italy. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Paszczyk, B.; Łuczyńska, J. The comparison of fatty acids composition and lipid quality indices in hard cow, sheep and goat cheeses. Foods 2020, 9, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wijendran, V.; Hayes, K.C. Dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acid balance and cardiovascular health. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2004, 24, 597–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Simopoulos, A.P. The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 233, 674–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tóth, T.; Mwau, P.J.; Bázár, G.; Andrássy-Baka, G.; Hingyi, H.; Csavajda, E.; Varga, L. Effect of feed supplementation based on extruded linseed meal and fish oil on composition and sensory properties of raw milk and ultra-high temperature treated milk. Int. Dairy J. 2019, 99, 104552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hirigoyen, D.; de los Santos, R.; Calvo, M.F.; Gonzales-Revello, A.; Constantin, M. Chemical composition and seasonal changes in the fatty acid profile of Uruguayan “Colonia” Cheeses. Grasas Aceites 2018, 69, e254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gutiérrez, L.F. Conjugated linoleic acid in milk and fermented milks: Variation and effects of the technological processes. VITAE. Rev. Fac. Cienc. Farm. Aliment. 2016, 23, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Griinari, J.M.; Corl, B.A.; Lacy, S.H.; Chouinard, P.Y.; Nurmela, K.V.V.; Bauman, D.E. Conjugated linoleic acid is synthesized endogenously in lactating dairy cows by Δ9-desaturase. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 2285–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Żegarska, Z.; Paszczyk, B.; Borejszo, Z. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and trans C18:1 and C18:2 isomers in fat of some commercial dairy products. Pol. J. Natur. Sci. 2008, 23, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fritsche, J.; Steinhart, H. Amounts of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in German foods and evaluation of daily intake. Z. Fur Lebensm. -Unters. Und -Forsch. A 1998, 206, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Donmez, M.; Seckin, A.K.; Sagdic, O.; Simsek, B. Chemical characteristics, fatty acid compositions, conjugated linoleic acid contents and cholesterol levels of same traditional Turkish cheeses. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 56, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Grega, T.; Sady, M.; Najgebauer, D.; Domagała, J.; Pustkowiak, H.; Faber, B. Seasonal changes in the level of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in ripened cheeses. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 2005, 21, 251–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shingfield, K.J.; Chilliard, Y.; Toivonen, P.; Kairenius, P.; Givens, D.I. Trans fatty acids and bioactive lipids in ruminant milk. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 606, 3–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Dhiman, T.R.; Nam, S.-H.; Ure, M.L. Factors affecting conjugated linoleic acid content in milk and meat. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45, 463–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lock, A.L.; Parodi, P.W.; Bauman, D.E. The biology of trans fatty acids: Implications for human health and the dairy industry. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 2005, 60, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
Animals 12 00198 g001 550
Figure 1. The chemical composition (%) of summer and winter cheeses made from cow’s milk. a,b—values differ significantly between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The chemical composition (%) of summer and winter cheeses made from cow’s milk. a,b—values differ significantly between groups (p < 0.05).
Animals 12 00198 g001
Animals 12 00198 g002 550
Figure 2. The content of cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA) and total C18:1 and C18:2 trans isomers (% of total fatty acids) in summer and winter cheeses made from cow’s milk. ∑trans C18:1—sum of trans isomers of C18:1, ∑ sum of trans C18:2 without c9t11 C18:2, a,b—statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. The content of cis9trans11 C18:2 (CLA) and total C18:1 and C18:2 trans isomers (% of total fatty acids) in summer and winter cheeses made from cow’s milk. ∑trans C18:1—sum of trans isomers of C18:1, ∑ sum of trans C18:2 without c9t11 C18:2, a,b—statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Animals 12 00198 g002
Table
Table 1. Covering the daily protein requirements after eating a portion of cheese.
Table 1. Covering the daily protein requirements after eating a portion of cheese.
Group/AgeBody Weight [kg]Reference Protein [g/kg b.w./Day]National Food Ration Protein -RDA [g/kg b.w./Day]Cheese
Consumption per Capita in 2019 * [kg Cheese/Day]		DDC
[%]
Summer
Cheeses		Winter
Cheeses
Women ≥ 1945–750.800.900.03314.4415.56
Men ≥ 1955–850.800.9012.2213.33
Pregnat women ˂ 19 age45–751.101.2010.8311.67
Pregnat women ≥ 19 age45–751.101.2010.8311.67
Breast-feeding women ˂ 19 age45–751.31.458.979.66
Breastfeeding women ≥ 19 age45–751.31.458,979.66
* Data in accordance with the Central Statistical Office in Poland in 2019 [68]. Source: own study based on Jarosz et al. [67]; Abbreviations: RDA—Recommended Daily Allowance; DDC—Daily Demandes Coverage.
Table
Table 2. Covering the daily fat requirements after eating a portion of cheese.
Table 2. Covering the daily fat requirements after eating a portion of cheese.
Group/AgeBody Weight [kg]RI [g/Person/Day]Cheese
Consumption per capita in 2019 * [kg Cheese/Day]		DDC
[%]
Summer CheesesWinter Cheeses
Women ≥ 19 770.03311.5811.86
558510.4910.74
Men ≥ 19651078.348.53
1157.767.94
Pregnat womenI658011.1511.41
II8710.2510.49
III939.609.82
Breastfeeding women85949.499.71
* Data in accordance with the Central Statistical Office in Poland in 2019 [68]. Source: own study based on Jarosz et al. [67]; Abbreviations: RI—Reference Intake; DDC—Daily Demandes Coverage.
Table
Table 3. Mean ± SD and range of fatty acids composition (% of total fatty acids) in summer and winter cheeses made from cow’s milk.
Table 3. Mean ± SD and range of fatty acids composition (% of total fatty acids) in summer and winter cheeses made from cow’s milk.
Summer CheesesWinter Cheeses
Mean ± SDMin–MaxMean ± SDMin–Max
n2020
C4:03.05±0.36 2.56–3.802.80±0.36 2.09–3.25
C6:02.12±0.08 2.00–2.251.98±0.27 1.54–2.25
C8:01.35±0.06 1.24–1.441.33±0.06 1.25–1.41
C10:03.07±0.17 2.81–3.293.18±0.08 3.09–3.32
C10:10.33±0.02 0.30–0.360.33±0.01 0.31–0.34
C11:00.06±0.01 0.04–0.070.06±0.01 0.5–0.07
C12:03.55±0.16 b3.22–3.693.75±0.13 a3.50–3.88
C12:10.08±0.01 0.07–0.090.09±0.00 0.08–0.09
C13:0 iso0.10±0.01 0.09–0.110.10±0.01 0.09–0.11
C13:00.13±0.02 0.10–0.170.12±0.01 0.10–0.14
C14:0 iso0.13±0.01 0.11–0.140.13±0.01 0.12–0.15
C14:011.31±0.24 b11.18–11.8512.10±0.23 a11.66–12.45
C15:0 iso0.28±0.02 0.23–0.310.26±0.02 0.23–0.29
C15:0 aiso0.56±0.06 a0.48–0.630.51±0.02 b0.49–0.53
C14:11.03±0.13 0.85–1.161.09±0.04 1.02–1.12
C15:01.26±0.06 1.18–1.341.22±0.04 1.17–1.27
C16:0 iso0.31±0.03 0.28–0.360.31±0.03 0.26–0.34
C16:029.09±1.77 b26.90–31.7532.53±0.40 a32.22–32.64
C17:0 iso0.44±0.04 a0.36–0.490.36±0.02 b0.33–0.39
C17:0 aiso0.23±0.03 a0.19–0.260.18±0.00 b0.17–0.19
C16:11.65±0.25 1.24–2.021.65±0.13 1.57–1.97
C17:00.86±0.38 a0.68–1.920.72±0.01 b0.71–0.74
C17:10.25±0.02 0.23–0.290.25±0.01 0.24–0.26
C18:09.95±0.53 9.20–10.729.64±0.48 8.89–10.26
t6 − t9 C18:10.44±0.04 0.41–0.520.42±0.02 0.37–0.34
t10 + t11 C18:12.20±0.65 a1.27–3.051.24±0.09 b1.13–1.35
t12 C18:10.30±0.04 0.26–0.38 0.28±0.02 0.24–0.30
c9 C18:119.59±0.57 a18.83–20.6019.04±0.43 b18.54–19.70
c11 C18:10.61±0.03 0.57–0.670.61±0.04 0.56–0.64
c12 C18:10.24±0.04 b0.19–0.300.27±0.03 a0.21–0.33
c13 C18:10.09±0.01 0.07–0.100.09±0.01 0.07–0.10
t16 C18:10.34±0.05 a0.27–0.42 0.29±0.02 b0.25–0.31
C19:00.19±0.02 a0.14–0.230.16±0.02 b0.14–0.18
c9 t13 C18:20.20±0.03 a0.15–0.250.16±0.01 b0.15–0.17
c9 t12 C18:20.18±0.03 a0.14–0.220.15±0.01 b0.13–0.17
t11 c15 C18:20.26±0.10 a0.10–0.370.10±0.02 b0.06–0.14
c9 c12 C18:21.52±0.19 a1.28–1.781.54±0.14 a1.39–1. 86
C20:00.15±0.01 0.14–0.160.15±0.01 0.13–0.16
C20:10.11±0.01 0.10–0.12 0.11±0.00 0.11–0.12
c9c12c15 C18:30.53±0.13 a0.31–0.660.35±0.07 b0.26–0.48
c9t11 C18:2 (CLA)0.88±0.19 a0.51–1.120.44±0.03 b0.39–0.48
n—number of samples, Min—minimum value, Max—maximum value, Mean—mean value, SD—standard deviation, a,b—statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Mean ± SD of sum of fatty acids (% of total fatty acids) and nutritional indices in summer and winter cheeses made from cow’s milk.
Table 4. Mean ± SD of sum of fatty acids (% of total fatty acids) and nutritional indices in summer and winter cheeses made from cow’s milk.
Fatty AcidsSummer CheesesWinter Cheeses
n2020
Mean ± SDMin–MaxMean ± SDMin–Max
ΣSCFA 19.58 ± 0.38 9.10–10.199.29 ± 0.69 8.08–10.07
ΣBCFA 22.08 ± 0.18 a1.76–2.241.84 ± 0.06 b1.76–1.97
ΣOCFA 32.50 ± 0.45 2.18–2.572.21 ± 0.04 2.15–2.27
ΣSFA 458.61 ± 1.12 b57.24–60.4162.30 ± 0.84 a61.40–63.99
ΣMUFA 527.25 ± 0.60 a26.32–28.6225.75 ± 0.50 b25.19–26.48
ΣPUFA 63.68 ± 0.60 a2.83–4.512.74 ± 0.14 b2.61–3.00
n − 30.53 ± 0.13 a0.31–0.660.35 ± 0.05 b0.31–0.42
n − 61.52 ± 0.19 1.28–1.781.54 ± 0.14 1.39–1.86
n − 6/n − 33.04 ± 0.81 b2.42–4.744.52 ± 0.99 a3.56–5.64
UFA 730.93 ± 0.94 a29.29–32.4428.50 ± 0.47 b27.75–29.16
DFA 840.89 ± 1.38 a38.49–42.5838.14 ± 0.91 b36.86–39.42
OFA948.66 ± 1.62 b46.68–51.2152.60 ± 1.15 a51.14–55.10
AI 102.01 ± 0.07 b1.85–2.123.06 ± 0.05 a3.00–3.17
TI 111.99 ± 0.11 b1.83–2.143.79 ± 0.06 a3.71–3.87
H/H 120.49 ± 0.03 a0.45–0.530.43 ± 0.01 b0.42–0.45
n—number of samples; Mean—mean value; SD—standard deviation; Min—minimum value; Max—maximum value; a,b—values denoted in rows by different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05); 1 ΣSCFA: sum of short-chain fatty acids (C4:0–C10:0); 2 ΣBCFA—all branched-chain fatty acids; 3 ΣOCFA—all odd-chain fatty acids; 4 SFA—all saturated fatty acids (without SCFA); 5 ΣMUFA—sum of monounsaturated fatty acids; 6 ΣPUFA—sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids; 7 UFA—sum of unsaturated fatty acids (ΣMUFA + ΣPUFA); 8 DFA—hypocholesterolemic fatty acids (ΣUFA + C18:0); 9 OFA—hypercholesterolemic fatty acids (ΣSFA-C18:0); 10 AI—(Index of Atherogenicity); 11 TI—(Index of Thrombogenicity); 12 H/H—(hypocholesterolaemic/hypercholesterolaemic ratio).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paszczyk, B.; Polak-Śliwińska, M.; Zielak-Steciwko, A.E. Chemical Composition, Fatty Acid Profile, and Lipid Quality Indices in Commercial Ripening of Cow Cheeses from Different Seasons. Animals 2022, 12, 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020198

AMA Style

Paszczyk B, Polak-Śliwińska M, Zielak-Steciwko AE. Chemical Composition, Fatty Acid Profile, and Lipid Quality Indices in Commercial Ripening of Cow Cheeses from Different Seasons. Animals. 2022; 12(2):198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020198

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paszczyk, Beata, Magdalena Polak-Śliwińska, and Anna E. Zielak-Steciwko. 2022. "Chemical Composition, Fatty Acid Profile, and Lipid Quality Indices in Commercial Ripening of Cow Cheeses from Different Seasons" Animals 12, no. 2: 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020198

APA Style

Paszczyk, B., Polak-Śliwińska, M., & Zielak-Steciwko, A. E. (2022). Chemical Composition, Fatty Acid Profile, and Lipid Quality Indices in Commercial Ripening of Cow Cheeses from Different Seasons. Animals, 12(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020198

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop