Next Article in Journal
Effects of Sanitizers on Microbiological Control of Hatching Eggshells and Poultry Health during Embryogenesis and Early Stages after Hatching in the Last Decade
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Rosmarinic Acid on Broiler Growth Performance, Serum Biochemistry, Liver Antioxidant Activity, and Muscle Tissue Composition
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparison between Vitamin D3 and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 on Laying Performance, Eggshell Quality and Ultrastructure, and Plasma Calcium Levels in Late Period Laying Hens
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Use of Removed Mesquite Brush as a Fiber Replacement in Silage Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Supplementation of Paraformic Acid as a Substitute for Antibiotics in the Diet Improves Growth Performance and Liver Health in Broiler Chickens

1
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Daizong Street 61#, Tai’an 271018, China
2
Shandong Wonong Agro-Tech Group Co., Ltd., Changning Street 118#, Weifang 261200, China
3
Shandong New Hope Liuhe Group Co., Ltd., Jiudongshui Road 592-26#, Qingdao 266100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(20), 2825; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202825
Submission received: 28 August 2022 / Revised: 11 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New and Potential Feedstuffs and Additives in Livestock)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Paraformic acid (PFA) is a hyperpolymer formed by polymerization of formic acid monomers, and PFA has a lower pungent smell and corrosiveness to the gastrointestinal tract compared with formic acid. The liver is a crucial metabolic organ, playing a momentous role in nutrients biosynthesis and metabolism, defense against bacterial invasion, and endotoxin clearance. However, in the condition of intensive poultry husbandry, the broiler’s liver is susceptible to inflammatory damage. Our results showed that PFA supplemented to the diet improved growth performance, inhibited inflammatory response, and benefited liver protection, which provided a direction for the use of PFA in broiler production.

Abstract

The current study aimed to explore the effects of supplementing paraformic acid (PFA) into broilers’ diet on growth performance, inflammatory responses, and liver protection. A total of 567 healthy one-day-old broilers were used in a 42-d study, and they were randomized into three groups. Broilers were fed a basal diet (CON group) or the basal diet supplemented with either 50 mg/kg aureomycin (AB group) or 1000 mg/kg PFA (PFA group). The results showed that the PFA and AB groups had a higher feed conversion rate than the CON group from day 21 to 42 (p < 0.05). Dietary PFA or aureomycin supplementation decreased serum levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-10, alanine transaminase, diamine oxidase, and D-lactate, and significantly increased serum concentrations of immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgM, and complement C4 (p < 0.05). Moreover, dietary PFA or aureomycin supplementation decreased hepatic levels of caspase-1, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-6, and IL-18, as well as NF-κB mRNA expression (p < 0.05). Above all, PFA supplementation into the broilers’ diet improved growth performance, inhibited inflammatory responses, and benefited liver protection. The protective effects of PFA on the liver might be related to inhibition of caspase-1-induced pyroptosis via inactivating the NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome axis in broiler chickens.

1. Introduction

Livestock productivity and profits are dramatically increased by intensive poultry farming systems, but they also raise the risk of inflammatory injury in broiler chickens because of environmental aspects, pathogenic bacteria, and poor feed hygiene [1]. The liver, as a crucial metabolic organ, plays a momentous role in nutrients biosynthesis and metabolism, defense against bacterial invasion, and endotoxin clearance. Therefore, the liver is one of the organs that are most susceptible to inflammatory injury [2]. Liver injury would cause a reduction in the animals’ detoxification ability and the animals’ performance, thus imperiling the sustainable development of industrial livestock and poultry farming [3,4]. With the banning or limitation of antibiotic growth promoter (AGP) in animal husbandry, it is essential to look for new feed additives that can decrease liver inflammatory responses in broiler chickens.
Formic acid (FA), a pure organic acid, has served as a feed preservative to guard feed against microbial and fungal contamination [5]. Studies indicated that supplementing FA into broiler chickens’ diet could elevate body weight (BW) gain and feed efficiency, which might be related to the reduced pH values of intestinal digesta which were beneficial in inhibiting harmful bacteria proliferation and increasing digestive enzymes’ activities and nutrients’ digestibility [6,7]. However, FA’s application in animal husbandry is constrained by its potent, pungent smell and corrosiveness to the gastrointestinal tract [8]. Therefore, FA derivatives are gradually applied to reduce the corrosive and pungent odor of FA [6,9]. Paraformic acid (PFA) is a hyperpolymer formed by polymerization of FA monomers. Our recent study indicated that 1000 mg/kg PFA supplementation into the broiler chickens’ diet could improve intestinal development and decrease intestinal inflammation via inactivation of the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway in broilers [10]. Moreover, Liu et al. [11] also demonstrated that the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway plays an important role in liver protection. However, there is no information available on the evaluation of effects of PFA supplementation into broiler chickens’ diet on the growth performance, inflammatory response, and liver protection in the scientific literature, and whether the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway is involved in liver protection by PFA needs to be studied.
Based on the above, this study aimed to explore the effects of supplementing PFA into broiler chickens’ diet on growth performance, inflammatory response, and liver protection based on the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. As aureomycin was generally considered to be an effective AGP [11,12,13], and it was applied as a positive control in our study to highlight the possibility of the application of PFA in the poultry industry.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Diets

A total of 567 healthy 1-day-old Arbor Acres (AA) broilers with an initial average BW of 48.76 ± 1.42 g were used in a 42-d study. All broilers were randomized into 3 treatment groups (7 replicates per group and 27 broiler chickens per replicate) and housed in three-level cages in a light- and temperature-controlled room providing 24 h of constant illumination in the first three days and then 23 h of light and 1 h of dark until the end of the experiment. Broilers in three treatment groups were fed a basal diet (CON group) or fed the basal diet supplemented with either 50 mg/kg commercial aureomycin (AB group) [11,13] or 1000 mg/kg PFA (PFA group) [10]. The basal diets (Table 1) were provided to broilers in terms of a two-phase feeding program (0–21 d and 21–42 d) and formulated in compliance with the National Research Council (NRC, 1994). Paraformic acid used in this study was provided by Omega Nutrition Group (Spain) & Numega Nutrition Pte. Ltd. Throughout the experiment, feed and water were freely available to the broilers. On days 7 and 14 of the experiment, a Newcastle disease vaccine and an inactivated infectious bursal disease vaccine, respectively, were administrated. After being maintained at −35 °C for the first week, the room temperature was gradually reduced by 1 °C every two days until a final temperature of 21 °C was achieved. Body weights per replicate (cage) at 21 and 42 days were weighed after 12 h of fasting, and the average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) were calculated as previously described [11].

2.2. Sample Collection and Carcass Traits

At the end of the trial, a total of 21 broilers from different cages (seven per group), with a BW closest to the cage average, were selected for fasting blood samples and liver tissue samples collection. Blood samples (5 mL) were collected via the wing vein into the coagulation-promoting tubes and centrifuged for 15 min at 3500× g at 4 °C after standing at room temperature for 30 min. Serum samples were obtained, followed by being kept at −35 °C until further analysis. Then, the broilers were narcotized by CO2 asphyxiation after blood samples collection. The eviscerated yield percentage, abdominal fat percentage, breast muscle percentage, and thigh muscle percentage were calculated as previously described [14,15]. Moreover, about 2 g of liver samples were obtained from each broiler and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

2.3. Determination of Serum Biochemical Indicators

The measurements of serum biochemical indicators, including total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), glucose (GLU), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and total cholesterol (TCHO) were performed with specific assays purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China) as described in Liu et al. [11].

2.4. Determination of Serum Inflammatory Cytokines and Immunoglobulins Concentrations

The serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-6 (IL-6), immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) were detected with chicken-specific assays (Jiangsu Meimian Industrial Co., Ltd., Zhangjiagang, China) as described previously [11].

2.5. Determination of Serum Diamine Oxidase (DAO) and D-Lactate Levels

Serum DAO activity and D-lactate concentration were analyzed by chicken-specific ELISA assays (Jiangsu Meimian Industrial Co., Ltd.) described in the Supplementary Methods.

2.6. Determination of Hepatic Injury Indexes, Inflammatory Cytokines, and Caspases Activities

Serum alanine transaminase (ALT) activity was determined using a commercially available kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Nanjing Jiancheng) on the Cobus-MiraPlus autoanalyzer. Serum complements (C3 and C4) concentrations and hepatic levels of 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, interleukin-18 (IL-18), caspase-1, and caspase-3 were examined with the assays (Jiangsu Meimian) on the basis of the protocol in the Supplementary Methods.

2.7. Determination of Hepatic Malondialdehyde (MDA) Concentration in Livers

Liver tissues were homogenized in 0.9% saline solution followed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 15 min. The supernatants were obtained and prepared for MDA determination using a specific assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) as described in Chen et al. [16].

2.8. Determination of Relative mRNA Expression in Livers

The detailed procedure of the relative mRNA expression determination in liver samples was described in the Supplementary Methods. Primer sequences, including TLR4, NF-κB, myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88), Bax, Bcl-2, sirtuin 1 (Sirt1), Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), necrosis-related factor 2 (Nrf2), superoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2), superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1), NADPH quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase-1 (GPX1), used for real-time PCR are shown in Table 2. The β-actin gene was amplified in parallel as the internal control for gene normalization and quantification. The 2−ΔΔ Ct method was used to calculate the relative target genes’ abundances in liver samples. All samples were measured in triplicate, and product sizes and quantities were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.9. Statistical Analyses

The average cage data were used to assess the effects on growth performance, and individual chicken data were used to access the effects on the other variables. Statistical analyses for all data were performed with one-way ANOVA of SAS (9.4 Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The POWER procedure of SAS was used to calculate the sample size [17]. Differences among the three groups were compared using Tukey’s multiple range tests. The Shapiro–Wilk W statistic was applied to check the normality of the data, and the data that were not normally distributed were transformed to achieve approximated normality. Values are presented as mean and standard error of mean (SEM) in tables, and values are expressed as mean ± standard error in Figures. Th statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, and a trend toward significance was considered at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Growth Performance

As shown in Table 3, relative to the broilers in CON group, the broilers in groups AB and PFA had significantly lower F/G from d 21 to 42 (p = 0.036) and tended to have decreased F/G from d 0 to 42 (p = 0.058). No significant difference was detected between the AB group and PFA group in terms of F/G throughout the experiment (p > 0.05). The body weight, ADFI, and ADG of the broilers did not show significant differences among all the groups during the experiment (p > 0.05).

3.2. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Carcass Traits

Indexes of the carcass traits of the broilers are displayed in Table 4. Broilers fed the AB diet had significantly higher breast muscle percentages than broilers fed the CON and PFA diets (p = 0.014). No statistically significant differences were detected in other indexes of the carcass traits among the three groups (p > 0.05).

3.3. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Serum Biochemical Indicators

There were no significant differences in serum concentrations of TP, ALB, GLU, TG, HDL, LDL, and TCHO among all treatments (p > 0.05, Table 5).

3.4. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Serum Inflammatory Cytokines and Immunoglobulins Concentrations

As presented in Figure 1, broilers in the AB group showed significantly reduced TNF-α concentrations and increased IgG concentrations in the serum compared with broilers in the CON and PFA groups (p < 0.05). Serum IL-6 and IL-1β concentrations in the AB group and PFA group were significantly lower than those in the CON group (p < 0.05), and serum IL-6 and IL-1β concentrations showed no significant differences between the AB group and the PFA group (p > 0.05). Serum IL-10 concentration was significantly lower in the AB and PFA groups than in the CON group (p < 0.05), and a significantly lower serum IL-10 concentration was observed in the AB group compared with the PFA group (p < 0.05). Groups AB and PFA showed markedly greater serum IgA concentrations than group CON (p < 0.05), while broilers in the AB group had significantly higher serum IgA concentrations than broilers in the PFA group (p < 0.05). Broilers in the PFA group displayed the highest serum IgM concentration, and the PFA group showed a significantly higher serum IgM concentration compared to the CON group and AB group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the serum IgM concentration in the AB group was significantly higher than that in the CON group (p < 0.05).

3.5. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Serum DAO and D-Lactate Levels

As shown in Table 6, the AB group and PFA group had significantly lower serum DAO activity and D-lactate concentrations than the CON group (p < 0.05).

3.6. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Hepatic Injury Indexes

As shown in Figure 2, the serum ALT activity in the AB group and PFA group was significantly lower than that in the CON group (p < 0.05). Broilers in the AB group showed a significantly higher serum complement C3 concentration and a lower hepatic 8-OHdG concentration than broilers in the CON group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the complement C4 concentration in the serum of the AB group was significantly higher than that of the CON group and PFA group (p < 0.05), and the serum complement C4 concentration in the PFA group significantly increased compared with that in the CON group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of ALT activity and complement C3 concentration in the serum and 8-OHdG concentration in the liver between the AB group and the PFA group (p > 0.05).

3.7. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Hepatic Apoptosis Indicators

Hepatic apoptosis indicators of broilers are displayed in Figure 3. PFA Broilers showed significantly lower hepatic caspase-1 activity than the CON broilers and AB broilers (p < 0.05), and the hepatic caspase-1 activity of the AB group was markedly reduced compared with that of the CON group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the PFA group expressed significantly higher hepatic Bcl-2 mRNA expression than the other groups (p < 0.05). However, the hepatic caspase-3 activity, Bax mRNA expression, and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio were not significantly different among the three groups (p > 0.05).

3.8. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Hepatic Inflammatory Cytokines and Genes Expressions

Hepatic inflammatory cytokines and genes expressions in broiler chickens are shown in Figure 4. Broilers in the AB group and PFA group showed significantly decreased NLRP3, TNF-α, and IL-18 concentrations and higher hepatic HSP70 levels compared with broilers in the CON group (p < 0.05). Compared to the CON group, dietary PFA supplementation significantly decreased hepatic IL-1β concentration (p < 0.05); supplementation of aureomycin and PFA significantly decreased hepatic IL-6 concentration (p < 0.05), and the hepatic IL-6 concentration in the PFA group was significantly lower than in the AB group (p < 0.05). Hepatic HSP70, NLRP3, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-18 concentrations showed no significant differences between the AB group and PFA group (p > 0.05). Moreover, compared with the CON group, supplementation of aureomycin or PFA significantly decreased hepatic NF-κB mRNA expression (p < 0.05), but the AB group showed a significant reduction in the hepatic NF-κB mRNA expression relative to the PFA group (p < 0.05). Neither TRL4 nor MyD88 expressions showed significant differences among all treatments (p > 0.05).

3.9. Effects of PFA Supplementation on Hepatic MDA Concentration and Antioxidant Genes Expressions

As represented in Figure 5, relative to the CON group, the AB group and PFA group showed a significantly decreased hepatic MDA concentration (p < 0.05). Supplementation of aureomycin significantly decreased the hepatic SOD2 mRNA expression (p < 0.05), and broilers fed the AB diet displayed significantly lower hepatic GPX1 and NQO1 expressions than broilers fed the CON diet and PFA diet (p < 0.05). Hepatic SOD1 expression in the PFA group had a trend to be increased compared with that in the AB group (p < 0.10). There were no significant differences in Sirt1, Nrf2, HO-1, and CAT mRNA expressions among all groups (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

The increasing spread of multi-resistant bacteria worldwide has posed a serious threat to global public health, which has led to growing discussion and concern about appropriate ways to use AGP in food animal production [18]. Formic acid is physiologically generated in animals’ metabolism and can also be obtained artificially by chemical synthesis [19]. Formic acid and its derivatives have been widely utilized in livestock feeds for decades because of its preservative and antimicrobial qualities [8,20]. Paraformic acid is a polymer formed by condensation of two FA molecules. Our recent study demonstrated that PFA supplementation was beneficial in improving intestinal development and changed the composition of cecal microbiota in broilers [10]. It has shown that aureomycin as AGP supplementation into the diet can promote broiler growth performance and carcass traits [21,22,23]. In the current study, decreased F/G and higher breast muscle percentage were also found in the broilers of the AB group compared with broilers of the CON group. Moreover, dietary PFA supplementation decreased F/G from d 21 to 42 and from d 0 to 42, suggesting that PFA had the potential to promote the growth of broiler chickens.
Inflammation is a considerable factor resulting in the reduction of broiler growth performance [24]. Song et al. [25] demonstrated that supplementing aureomycin reduced serum IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-2 levels in broilers. In the present study, supplementation of 50 mg/kg aureomycin also decreased serum concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines, containing TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, in broilers. Moreover, significantly decreased serum IL-1β and IL-6 concentrations were also observed in the PFA broilers in this study. Interleukin-1β is a master regulator of the physiological and pathological states and plays a vital role in inflammation-related diseases. Interleukin-1β has strong proinflammatory activity, triggering varieties of pro-inflammatory cytokines generation [26]. The pleiotropic inflammatory cytokine IL-6 plays a number of roles in inflammation and metabolic disease [27]. In addition, IL-1β could also induce IL-6 production [28]. Interestingly, supplementation of aureomycin or PFA decreased the serum IL-10 concentration of the broilers in the current experiment. The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 is produced by CD (+) cells and plays a crucial role in maintaining tissue homeostasis in the presence of infection or inflammation [29]. Previous studies have demonstrated that an increased IL-6 concentration frequently induced an increase in IL-10 in the blood under chronic inflammatory conditions, which might be involved in the self-healing capacity of the body [30]. The results of the current study illustrated that dietary PFA was beneficial in reducing the body’s inflammatory response through inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines. On the other hand, dietary PFA supplementation increased the serum IgA and IgM concentrations, which was in accord with the effects of aureomycin addition. A previous study also found that aureomycin supplementation increased serum the IgM concentration of the broilers [22]. Immunoglobulins provide a first line of defense against extracellular infections for the host. Especially, as the first immunoglobulin expressed during B-cell development, IgM not only responds quickly to a variety of antigens, but also plays a vital role in immunoregulation [31]. Compared with IgM, IgA is a poor player in systemic immune response [32]. In this study, PFA broilers also showed a higher serum IgM concentration than AB broilers, suggesting that adding PFA to the diet enhanced the immune function of the broilers.
In addition, we found that supplementing PFA or aureomycin in the diets decreased the serum ALT concentration in the present study. Transaminase is the main enzyme involved in liver metabolism and will be released into the circulation once the hepatocytes are damaged, leading to a dramatically increased concentration in the blood [33]. The liver of poultry is more and more easily damaged because of the improper use of chemical drugs, molds, and environmental factors in the extensive poultry farming industry [1]. The results of ALT suggested decreased hepatocyte damage in the broilers in the PFA and AB group. Moreover, we examined the serum concentrations of complements C3 and C4, as well as the hepatic concentration of 8-OHdG. Proteins of the complement systems are produced by hepatocytes. Hepatic dysfunction is often accompanied by reduced serum complement C3 and C4, so complement C3 and C4 can be available markers to assess liver function and hepatocellular damage [34]. DNA damage often produced 8-OHdG in the nucleotide pool during DNA replication, so 8-OHdG is regarded as the most significant marker of DNA damage [35]. A previous study has shown that aureomycin supplementation decreased the 8-OHdG concentration in the serum and jejunum of the broilers [36]. The results in this study demonstrated that dietary PFA and aureomycin both played protective roles in the liver.
To further investigate the underlying mechanism of the protective effects of dietary PFA supplementation on the livers of broiler chickens, hepatic caspases activities and relative mRNA expressions of pro-apoptotic Bax and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 were examined. In the present study, supplementation with 1000 mg/kg PFA increased the Bcl-2 mRNA expression and decreased caspase-1 activity. The Bcl-2 family play a key role in the control of apoptosis, and Bcl-2 functions upstream as a caspase activation inhibitor [37]. The cysteine protease caspase-1 is an evolutionarily conserved inflammatory mediator, and it proteolytically cleaves and matures IL-1β and IL-18 in answer to NLRP3 inflammasome activation [38]. Subsequently, the caspase-1 activates pyroptosis that is a type of inflammation-induced cell death triggered by the cytosolic danger signals or pathogens [39]. Consistently, decreased hepatic NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β and IL-18 concentrations were found in the PFA group in the present study. Studies in vitro showed that NF-κB signaling is an essential prerequisite for an efficient activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in primary hepatocytes [40]. In this study, we also found that supplementation of PFA reduced NF-κB mRNA expression as well as TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations in the liver. It was reported that NF-κB signaling was a key inducer of inflammation, and blockade of NF-κB activation restrained TNF-α and IL-6 generation [41]. Moreover, 1000 mg/kg PFA addition elevated hepatic HSP70 level in this study. Heat shock protein 70 s are crucial parts of the cellular network of folding catalysts and molecular chaperones. Martine et al. [42] indicated that HSP70, serving as an NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, played protective roles against hepatic inflammatory cytokines in chickens and mice [43,44,45]. Decreased inflammatory cytokines concentrations and NF-κB expression, as well as caspase-1 activity, were also found in the broilers fed the aureomycin-supplemented diet in this study. Therefore, our study demonstrated that dietary PFA might be beneficial to liver protection through decreasing caspase-1-induced pyroptosis via inactivating the NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome axis.
A persistently active inflammatory response can result in an overproduction of reactive oxygen species, which can harm critical cellular components by oxidizing proteins, modifying DNA histones, and lipids [46]. In our study, broilers in the AB group and PFA group exhibited decreased hepatic MDA concentrations compared with broilers in the CON group. Malondialdehyde is a secondary product of lipid oxidation and closely related to cell damage, so it is widely considered as an indicator to evaluate the extent of lipid peroxidation [47]. The results in this study might demonstrate that PFA or aureomycin supplementation reduced hepatic oxidative damage. However, PFA or aureomycin supplementation did not increase the expression of hepatic antioxidation-related genes, which might suggest that PFA or aureomycin benefited liver health primarily by reducing the hepatic inflammatory response in broiler chickens. The down-regulated mRNA expressions of SOD2, GPX1, and NQO1 in the AB group compared with the CON group might be associated with the decreased inflammation-induced oxidative stress [36].
In the current study, dietary PFA or aureomycin supplementation reduced serum DAO and D-lactate concentrations. The serum DAO and D-lactate levels are usually considered markers for assessing the extent of intestinal mucosal damage [48]. Damaged intestinal mucosal could lead to increased intestinal permeability and the release of intracellular enzyme DAO and bacteria-produced D-lactate from the intestine into the blood [49]. The decreased serum levels of DAO and D-lactate demonstrated that dietary PFA or aureomycin supplementation was helped to maintain intestinal mucosal integrity, which was in accordance with Li et al. [10]. Previous studies have also shown that supplementation of FA and its derivatives, as well as aureomycin, could improve intestinal development and maintain the normal intestinal barrier structure of broilers [6,50]. The liver is situated between the absorptive surfaces of the gastrointestinal tract, and its blood supply mostly comes from the gut via the hepatic portal vein. The damaged intestinal mucosa would cause the translocation of bacterial products to the liver, resulting in liver function impairment [51]. Therefore, these results suggested that the protective effect of PFA or aureomycin supplementation on liver health might be partly attributed to decreased intestinal injury.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, dietary PFA addition could promote growth performance, inhibit inflammatory responses and benefit liver protection. The protective effects of PFA on the liver might be related to the suppression of caspase-1-induced pyroptosis through blockage of the NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome axis in the broiler chickens. Our study provided a direction for the use of PFA in broiler production.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded from: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12202825/s1. Supplementary Methods: Detailed procedures of ELISA analysis; Determination of relative mRNA expression in livers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.W., L.Y. and Y.L. (Yang Li); data curation, Q.W., J.N. and Y.L. (Yang Liu); formal analysis, J.N., Y.L. (Yang Liu), L.H. and S.J.; funding acquisition, W.Y. and Y.L. (Yang Li); investigation, Q.W. and W.Y.; methodology, Q.W., N.J., L.Y., W.Y. and Y.L. (Yang Li); project administration, Q.W., J.N., Y.L. (Yang Liu) and L.H.; software, J.N. and S.J.; supervision, W.Y. and Y.L. (Yang Li); validation, W.Y. and Y.L. (Yang Li); visualization, J.N., N.J. and S.J.; writing—original draft, Q.W.; writing—review and editing, W.Y. and Y.L. (Yang Li). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Shandong Agricultural University (grant number 040/76598) and Shandong Province Pig Industry Technology System (grant number SDAIT-08-04 and SDAIT-08-05).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Care and Use committee of Shandong Agricultural University (protocol code: SDAUA-2021-019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Han, C.; Wei, Y.; Wang, X.; Ba, C.; Shi, W. Protective effect of Salvia miltiorrhiza polysaccharides on liver injury in chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 3496–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zeeh, J. The aging liver: Consequences for drug treatment in old age. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2001, 32, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, T. Pterostilbene as a protective antioxidant attenuates diquat-induced liver injury and oxidative stress in 21-day-old broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 3158–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, Y.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, X.; Chen, L.; Hong, L.; Zhuo, Y.; Lin, Y.; Fang, Z.; Che, L.; Feng, B.; et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with exogenous catalase on growth performance, oxidative stress, and hepatic apoptosis in weaned piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abdollahi, M.; Zaefarian, F.; Hall, L.; Jendza, J. Feed acidification and steam-conditioning temperature influence nutrient utilization in broiler chickens fed wheat-based diets. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 5037–5046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ragaa, N.M.; Korany, R.M. Studying the effect of formic acid and potassium diformate on performance, immunity and gut health of broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 2, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al-Natour, M.Q.; Alshawabkeh, K.M. Using Varying Levels of Formic Acid to Limit Growth of Salmonella gallinarum in Contaminated Broiler Feed. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Luise, D.; Correa, F.; Bosi, P.; Trevisi, P. A Review of the Effect of Formic Acid and Its Salts on the Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Performance of Pigs. Animals 2020, 10, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.L.; Zheng, P.; Zhang, C.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Yu, J.; Luo, J.Q.; Mao, X.B.; Huang, Z.Q.; Chen, D.W. Benzoic acid beneficially affects growth performance of weaned pigs which was associated with changes in gut bacterial populations, morphology indices and growth factor gene expression. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 101, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Niu, J.; Jing, C.; Jiao, N.; Huang, L.; Jiang, S.; Yan, L.; Yang, W.; Li, Y. Supplementation with paraformic acid in the diet improved intestinal development through modulating intestinal inflammation and microbiota in broiler chickens. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 975056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Niu, J.; Liu, H.; Jiao, N.; Huang, L.; Jiang, S.; Yan, L.; Yang, W. Effects of Dietary Macleaya cordata Extract Containing Isoquinoline Alkaloids Supplementation as an Alternative to Antibiotics in the Diets on Growth Performance and Liver Health of Broiler Chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 950174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xue, F.; Shi, L.; Li, Y.; Ni, A.; Ma, H.; Sun, Y.; Chen, J. Effects of replacing dietary Aureomycin with a combination of plant essential oils on production performance and gastrointestinal health of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 4521–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, L.; Fu, G.; Liu, S.; Li, L.; Zhao, X. Effects of oxygen levels and a Lactobacillus plantarum strain on mortality and immune response of chickens at high altitude. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhao, W.; Li, J.; Xing, T.; Zhang, L.; Gao, F. Effects of guanidinoacetic acid and complex antioxidant supplementation on growth performance, meat quality, and antioxidant function of broiler chickens. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 101, 3961–3968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Deng, S.; Xing, T.; Li, C.; Xu, X.; Zhou, G. The Effect of Breed and Age on the Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Metabolic Profile in Breast Muscle of Chinese Indigenous Chickens. Foods 2022, 11, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.; Li, F.; Yang, W.; Jiang, S.; Li, Y. Supplementation with Exogenous Catalase from Penicillium notatum in the Diet Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Intestinal Oxidative Damage through Affecting Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity and Microbiota in Weaned Pigs. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e0065421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ko, M.J.; Lim, C.-Y. General considerations for sample size estimation in animal study. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2021, 74, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Högberg, L.D.; Heddini, A.; Cars, O. The global need for effective antibiotics: Challenges and recent advances. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2010, 31, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bulushev, D.A.; Ross, J.R.H. Towards Sustainable Production of Formic Acid. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 821–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bampidis, V.; Azimonti, G.; de Lourdes Bastos, M.; Christensen, H.; Dusemund, B.; Kos Durjava, M.; Kouba, M.; López-Alonso, M.; López Puente, S.; Marcon, F.; et al. Efficacy of calcium formate as a technological feed additive (preservative) for all animal species. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e06077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, Y.; Ni, A.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, Z.; Shi, L.; Xu, H.; Chen, C.; Li, D.; Han, Y.; et al. Effects of Replacing In-feed Antibiotics with Synergistic Organic Acids on Growth Performance, Health, Carcass, and Immune and Oxidative Statuses of Broiler Chickens under Clostridium perfringens Type A Challenge. Avian Dis. 2020, 64, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, W.; Xu, B.; Wang, L.; Sun, Q.; Deng, W.; Wei, F.; Ma, H.; Fu, C.; Wang, G.; Li, S. Effects of Clostridium butyricum on Growth Performance, Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Barrier Function of Broilers. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 777456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ramirez, S.Y.; Peñuela-Sierra, L.M.; Ospina, M.A. Effects of oregano (Lippia origanoides) essential oil supplementation on the performance, egg quality, and intestinal morphometry of Isa Brown laying hens. Vet. World 2021, 14, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jiang, J.; Qi, L.; Lv, Z.; Jin, S.; Wei, X.; Shi, F. Dietary Stevioside Supplementation Alleviates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Intestinal Mucosal Damage through Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Effects in Broiler Chickens. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Song, D.; Li, A.; Wang, Y.; Song, G.; Cheng, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, K.; Min, Y.; Wang, W. Effects of synbiotic on growth, digestibility, immune and antioxidant performance in broilers. Animal 2022, 16, 100497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dinarello, C.A. Immunological and Inflammatory Functions of the Interleukin-1 Family. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 519–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, X.-W.; Zhou, S.-F. Inflammation, cytokines, the IL-17/IL-6/STAT3/NF-κB axis, and tumorigenesis. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 2941–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Oh, K.; Lee, O.-Y.; Park, Y.; Seo, M.W.; Lee, D.-S. IL-1β induces IL-6 production and increases invasiveness and estrogen-independent growth in a TG2-dependent manner in human breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ouyang, W.; O’Garra, A. IL-10 Family Cytokines IL-10 and IL-22: From Basic Science to Clinical Translation. Immunity 2019, 50, 871–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jndoyan, Z.T.; Bablumyan, A.Y.; Ginosyan, K.V.; Shekoyan, S.V. Correlations between indicators of interleukin-10 and interleukin-6 in patients with periodic disease. Ter. Arkhiv 2018, 90, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, E.; Hong, R.; Lu, Q.; Ohno, H.; Wang, J.-Y. Role of the IgM Fc Receptor in Immunity and Tolerance. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Monteiro, R.C. Role of IgA and IgA Fc Receptors in Inflammation. J. Clin. Immunol. 2009, 30, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, Y.; Chen, L.; Lin, Y.; Fang, Z.; Che, L.; Xu, S.; Wu, D. Effects of replacing soybean meal with detoxified Jatropha curcas kernel meal in the diet on growth performance and histopathological parameters of growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2015, 204, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ellison, R.T., 3rd; Horsburgh, C.R., Jr.; Curd, J. Complement levels in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1990, 35, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cadet, J. Oxidative degradation pathways of cellular DNA: Product formation and mechanistic insights. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 75 (Suppl. S1), S2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, B.; Cao, X.; Fu, A.; Li, Y.; Li, W. Effects of probiotic Bacillus as a substitute for antibiotics on antioxidant capacity and intestinal autophagy of piglets. AMB Express 2017, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Brown, R. The bcl-2 family of proteins. Br. Med. Bull. 1997, 53, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Lamkanfi, M.; Dixit, V.M. Inflammasomes: Guardians of cytosolic sanctity. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 227, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yu, P.; Zhang, X.; Liu, N.; Tang, L.; Peng, C.; Chen, X. Pyroptosis: Mechanisms and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boaru, S.G.; Borkham-Kamphorst, E.; Van de Leur, E.; Lehnen, E.; Liedtke, C.; Weiskirchen, R. NLRP3 inflammasome expression is driven by NF-κB in cultured hepatocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 458, 700–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yao, J.; Du, X.; Chen, S.; Shao, Y.; Deng, K.; Jiang, M.; Liu, J.; Shen, Z.; Chen, X.; Feng, G. Rv2346c enhances mycobacterial survival within macrophages by inhibiting TNF-α and IL-6 production via the p38/miRNA/NF-κB pathway. Emerg. Microbes. Infect 2018, 7, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Martine, P.; Chevriaux, A.; Derangère, V.; Apetoh, L.; Garrido, C.; Ghiringhelli, F.; Rébé, C. HSP70 is a negative regulator of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wu, H.-H.; Huang, C.-C.; Chang, C.-P.; Lin, M.-T.; Niu, K.-C.; Tian, Y.-F. Heat Shock Protein 70 (HSP70) Reduces Hepatic Inflammatory and Oxidative Damage in a Rat Model of Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury with Hyperbaric Oxygen Preconditioning. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 8096–8104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, L.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, L.; Xing, G.; Chen, Y.; Xin, Y. Schisandrin B attenuates acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury through heat-shock protein 27 and 70 in mice. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 29, 640–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, H.; Li, S.; Teng, X. The Antagonistic Effect of Selenium on Lead-Induced Inflammatory Factors and Heat Shock Proteins mRNA Expression in Chicken Livers. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 171, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mani, R.S.; Amin, M.A.; Li, X.; Kalyana-Sundaram, S.; Veeneman, B.A.; Wang, L.; Ghosh, A.; Aslam, A.; Ramanand, S.G.; Rabquer, B.J.; et al. Inflammation-Induced Oxidative Stress Mediates Gene Fusion Formation in Prostate Cancer. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 2620–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zhuo, Y.; Fang, Z.; Che, L.; Feng, B.; Xu, S.; et al. Maternal Dietary Fiber Composition during Gestation Induces Changes in Offspring Antioxidative Capacity, Inflammatory Response, and Gut Microbiota in a Sow Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Guo, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, C.; Yu, Y.; Tian, Z. Impaired intestinal barrier function in a mouse model of hyperuricemia. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 3292–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Chen, J.; Yu, B.; Chen, D.; Huang, Z.; Mao, X.; Zheng, P.; Yu, J.; Luo, J.; He, J. Chlorogenic acid improves intestinal barrier functions by suppressing mucosa inflammation and improving antioxidant capacity in weaned pigs. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 59, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, W.; Xiao, Z.; An, W.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, B. Dietary sodium butyrate improves intestinal development and function by modulating the microbial community in broilers. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Seki, E.; Schnabl, B. Role of innate immunity and the microbiota in liver fibrosis: Crosstalk between the liver and gut. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on serum inflammatory cytokine and immunoglobulin concentrations in broiler chickens. (a) TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; (b) IL-1β, interleukin-1 beta; (c) IL-6, interleukin-6; (d) IL-10, interleukin-10; (e) IgA, immunoglobulin A; (f) IgG, immunoglobulin G; (g) IgM, immunoglobulin M. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Values are mean ± standard error (n = 7). a,b,c Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on serum inflammatory cytokine and immunoglobulin concentrations in broiler chickens. (a) TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; (b) IL-1β, interleukin-1 beta; (c) IL-6, interleukin-6; (d) IL-10, interleukin-10; (e) IgA, immunoglobulin A; (f) IgG, immunoglobulin G; (g) IgM, immunoglobulin M. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Values are mean ± standard error (n = 7). a,b,c Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Animals 12 02825 g001
Figure 2. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on hepatic injury indexes in broiler chickens. (a) Alanine transaminase (ALT); (b) Complement C3; (c) Complement C4; (d) 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Values are mean ± standard error (n = 7). a,b,c Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on hepatic injury indexes in broiler chickens. (a) Alanine transaminase (ALT); (b) Complement C3; (c) Complement C4; (d) 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Values are mean ± standard error (n = 7). a,b,c Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Animals 12 02825 g002
Figure 3. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on hepatic apoptosis indicators in broiler chickens. (a) Caspase-3; (b) Caspase-1; (c) Bax; (d) Bcl-2; (e) Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Values are mean ± standard error (n = 7). a,b,c Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on hepatic apoptosis indicators in broiler chickens. (a) Caspase-3; (b) Caspase-1; (c) Bax; (d) Bcl-2; (e) Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Values are mean ± standard error (n = 7). a,b,c Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Animals 12 02825 g003
Figure 4. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on hepatic apoptosis indicators in broiler chickens. (a) HSP70, hepatic heat shock protein 70; (b) NLRP3, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3; (c) TNF-α,tumor necrosis factor-alpha; (d) IL-1β, interleukin-1beta; (e) IL-6, interleukin-6; (f) IL-18, interleukin-1; (g) TRL4, toll-like receptor 4; (h) MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; (i) NF-κB, nuclear factor-kappa B. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 7). a,b,c Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on hepatic apoptosis indicators in broiler chickens. (a) HSP70, hepatic heat shock protein 70; (b) NLRP3, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3; (c) TNF-α,tumor necrosis factor-alpha; (d) IL-1β, interleukin-1beta; (e) IL-6, interleukin-6; (f) IL-18, interleukin-1; (g) TRL4, toll-like receptor 4; (h) MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; (i) NF-κB, nuclear factor-kappa B. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 7). a,b,c Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Animals 12 02825 g004
Figure 5. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on hepatic MDA concentration and antioxidant genes expressions in broiler chickens. (a) MDA, malondialdehyde; (b) Sirt1, sirtuin 1; (c) Nrf2, necrosis-related factor 2; (d) HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; (e) SOD1, superoxide dismutase-1; (f) SOD2, superoxide dismutase-2; (g) CAT, catalase; (h) GPX1, glutathione peroxidase-1; (i) NQO1, NADPH quinone oxidoreductase 1. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 7). a,b Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on hepatic MDA concentration and antioxidant genes expressions in broiler chickens. (a) MDA, malondialdehyde; (b) Sirt1, sirtuin 1; (c) Nrf2, necrosis-related factor 2; (d) HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; (e) SOD1, superoxide dismutase-1; (f) SOD2, superoxide dismutase-2; (g) CAT, catalase; (h) GPX1, glutathione peroxidase-1; (i) NQO1, NADPH quinone oxidoreductase 1. CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 7). a,b Means with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05).
Animals 12 02825 g005
Table 1. Ingredients composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (as-fed basis).
Table 1. Ingredients composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (as-fed basis).
ItemsPhases
0–21 d21–42 d
Ingredients, %
Corn55.9155.91
Soybean meal, 44% CP13.7810.18
Wheat bran11.9812.98
Corn starch residue7.999.98
Corn gluten meal3.993.99
Extruded soybean1.502.10
Limestone1.701.70
Calcium monophosphate1.101.10
L-Lysine HCl1.001.00
DL-Methionine0.200.20
L-Threonine0.100.10
Sodium chloride0.400.40
Choline0.100.10
Phytase0.100.10
Complex enzyme0.020.02
Trace mineral premix 10.100.10
Vitamin premix 20.020.02
Antioxidant0.020.02
Total100100
Calculated analysis, %
Metabolizable energy, MJ/kg12.3312.50
Crude protein19.4717.93
Crude fat3.453.74
Calcium, %0.940.87
Available phosphorus, %0.350.33
Lysine, %1.151.00
Methionine, %0.500.40
1 Provided per kilogram of complete basal diet: 10 mg of Cu as CuSO4, 100 mg of Fe as FeSO4, 1.1 mg of I as Ca(IO3)2, 65 mg of Zn as ZnSO4, 100 mg of Mn as MnSO4 and 0.3 mg of Se as Na2SeO3. 2 Provided per kilogram of complete basal diet: vitamin A 10,000 IU, vitamin D3 3000 IU, vitamin E 30 IU, vitamin K3 1.3 mg, vitamin B1 2.2 mg, vitamin B2 8 mg, vitamin B3 8 mg, vitamin B6 4 mg, vitamin B12 0.025 mg, biotin 0.2 mg, niacin 40 mg, folic acid 1 mg and D-calcium pantothenate 10 mg.
Table 2. Primer sequences used for quantitative real-time PCR.
Table 2. Primer sequences used for quantitative real-time PCR.
GenesGene Bank No.Primer Sequences a (5’-3’)Size, bp
β-actinNM_205518.1F: TTGGTTTGTCAAGCAAGCGG100
R: CCCCCACATACTGGCACTTT
TLR4NM_001030693.1F: AGGCACCTGAGCTTTTCCTC96
R: TACCAACGTGAGGTTGAGCC
MyD88XM_046910878.1F: TGATGCCTTCATCTGCTACTG174
R: TCCCTCCGACACCTTCTTTCTA
NF-κBNM_001396038.1F: CAGCCCATCTATGACAACCG152
R: TCAGCCCAGAAACGAACCTC
BaxXM_422067F: GGTGACAGGGATCGTCACAG108
R: TAGGCCAGGAACAGGGTGAAG
Blc-2NM_205339.2F: GCTGCTTTACTCTTGGGGGT128
R: CTTCAGCACTATCTCGCGGT
Sirt1XM_046920057.1F: GATCAGCAAAAGGCTGGATGGT143
R: ACGAGCCGCTTTCGCTACTAC
Nrf2XM_015289381.2F: CCCGCACCATGGAGATCGAG180
R: GGAGCTGCTCTTGTCTTTCCT
HO-1NM_205344.1F: GTCGTTGGCAAGAAGCATCC106
R: GGGCCTTTTGGGCGATTTTC
SOD1NM_205064.1F: GGCAATGTGACTGCAAAGGG133
R: CCCCTCTACCCAGGTCATCA
SOD2NM_204211.2F: CTTGGTCGCAAGGCAGAAG120
R: ACGTAGGTGGCGTGGTGTT
CATNM_001031215.1F: GGTTCGGTGGGGTTGTCTTT211
R: CACCAGTGGTCAAGGCATCT
GPX1HM590226F: AACCAATTCGGGCACCAG122
R: CCGTTCACCTCGCACTTCTC
NQO1NM_001277619.1F: AACCTCTTTCAACCACGCCA113
R: GTGAGAGCACGGCATTGAAC
a F, forward; R, reverse.
Table 3. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on growth performance of broilers.
Table 3. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on growth performance of broilers.
ItemsTreatments aSEMp Value
CONABPFA
Body weight, g
d 047.6047.6347.600.590.999
d 21775.70765.39789.378.600.544
d 422171.332234.932252.6733.810.604
Average daily feed intake, g/d
d 0–2157.3257.3358.370.600.723
d 21–42142.12137.91140.262.840.835
d 0–4299.7297.6299.321.560.846
Average daily gain, g/d
d 0–2134.6734.1835.320.410.549
d 21–4266.4669.9869.681.500.590
d 0–4250.5752.0852.500.810.610
Feed-to-gain ratio
d 0–211.661.681.650.010.558
d 21–422.14 a1.97 b2.01 b0.020.036
d 0–421.901.831.830.010.058
Values are presented as mean and standard error of mean (SEM). a,b Means with different superscripts within a row differ (p < 0.05). a CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. n = 7.
Table 4. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on carcass traits in broiler chickens.
Table 4. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on carcass traits in broiler chickens.
Items, %Treatments aSEMp Value
CONABPFA
Eviscerated yield percentage73.6871.6172.461.440.399
Abdominal fat percentage1.261.181.360.070.221
Breast muscle percentage23.02 b26.89 a22.88 b0.920.014
Thigh muscle percentage16.7118.0619.240.390.310
Values are presented as mean and standard error of mean (SEM). a,b Means with different superscripts within a row differ (p < 0.05). a CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. n = 7.
Table 5. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on serum biochemical indicators in broiler chickens.
Table 5. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on serum biochemical indicators in broiler chickens.
Items Treatments aSEMp Value
CONABPFA
TP, g/L28.5526.4231.221.630.499
ALB, g/L7.556.637.570.420.594
HDL, mmol/L1.501.411.670.060.205
LDL, mmol/L0.460.480.610.050.430
TCHO, mmol/L2.812.493.080.120.158
TG, mmol/L0.560.400.470.050.439
GLU, mmol/L11.1210.5211.600.490.673
Values are presented as mean and standard error of mean (SEM). a CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. n = 7.
Table 6. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on serum diamine oxidase and D-lactate levels in broiler chickens.
Table 6. Effects of paraformic acid (PFA) supplementation on serum diamine oxidase and D-lactate levels in broiler chickens.
ItemsTreatments aSEMp Values
CONABPFA
Diamine oxidase, pg/mL144.28 a126.78 b128.57 b1.04<0.001
D-lactate, μg/L487.66 a452.83 b460.83 b4.02<0.001
Values are presented as mean and standard error of mean (SEM). a,b Means with different superscripts within a row differ (p < 0.05). a CON, broiler chickens receiving basal diet; AB, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 50 mg/kg aureomycin; PFA, broiler chickens receiving basal diet supplemented with 1000 mg/kg PFA. n = 7.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Niu, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiao, N.; Huang, L.; Jiang, S.; Yan, L.; Yang, W.; Li, Y. Supplementation of Paraformic Acid as a Substitute for Antibiotics in the Diet Improves Growth Performance and Liver Health in Broiler Chickens. Animals 2022, 12, 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202825

AMA Style

Wang Q, Niu J, Liu Y, Jiao N, Huang L, Jiang S, Yan L, Yang W, Li Y. Supplementation of Paraformic Acid as a Substitute for Antibiotics in the Diet Improves Growth Performance and Liver Health in Broiler Chickens. Animals. 2022; 12(20):2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202825

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qinjin, Jiaxing Niu, Yang Liu, Ning Jiao, Libo Huang, Shuzhen Jiang, Lei Yan, Weiren Yang, and Yang Li. 2022. "Supplementation of Paraformic Acid as a Substitute for Antibiotics in the Diet Improves Growth Performance and Liver Health in Broiler Chickens" Animals 12, no. 20: 2825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202825

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop