Next Article in Journal
The Phylogenetic Relationships of the Family Sciaenidae Based on Genome-Wide Data Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Flunixin Meglumine Is Superior to Meloxicam for Providing Analgesia after Surgical Castration in 2-Month-Old Goats
Previous Article in Journal
Bacteriuria in Cystocentesis Samples from Cats in the United Kingdom: Prevalence, Bacterial Isolates, and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Controlled Intestinal Microbiota Colonisation in Broilers under the Industrial Production System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare

1
Centre for Compassionate Conservation, TD School, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
2
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(23), 3385; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233385
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 26 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animals’ Tenth Anniversary)

Simple Summary

The key starting points for assessing horse welfare are a detailed understanding of what is usual for horses under optimal conditions, and knowledge about conditions that may impact welfare. This review presents the foundational knowledge required for undertaking comprehensive assessments of horse welfare organised according to a novel holistic framework, i.e., the Five Domains Model. It is a resource specifically tailored to assist those wishing to assess the welfare of horses in free-roaming or domestic situations.

Abstract

A detailed understanding of what is usual for a species under optimal conditions is critical for identifying and interpreting different features of body function that have known impacts on animal welfare and its assessment. When applying the Five Domains Model to assess animal welfare, the key starting point is therefore to acquire extensive species-specific knowledge relevant to each of the four physical/functional Domains of the Model. These Domains, 1 to 4, address areas where objective information is evaluated and collated. They are: (1) Nutrition; (2) Physical environment; (3) Health; and (4) Behavioural interactions. It is on the basis of this detailed knowledge that cautious inferences can then be made about welfare-relevant mental experiences animals may have, aligned with Domain 5, Mental State. However, this review is focused entirely on the first four Domains in order to provide a novel holistic framework to collate the multidisciplinary knowledge of horses required for undertaking comprehensive welfare assessments. Thus, inferring the potential mental experiences aligned with Domain 5, the final step in model-based welfare assessments, is not considered here. Finally, providing extensive information on free-roaming horses enables a better understanding of the impacts of human interventions on the welfare of horses in both free-roaming and domestic situations.
Keywords: horse; welfare assessment; wild horse; Five Domains horse; welfare assessment; wild horse; Five Domains

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Harvey, A.M.; Ramp, D.; Mellor, D.J. Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare. Animals 2022, 12, 3385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233385

AMA Style

Harvey AM, Ramp D, Mellor DJ. Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare. Animals. 2022; 12(23):3385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233385

Chicago/Turabian Style

Harvey, Andrea M., Daniel Ramp, and David J. Mellor. 2022. "Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare" Animals 12, no. 23: 3385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233385

APA Style

Harvey, A. M., Ramp, D., & Mellor, D. J. (2022). Review of the Foundational Knowledge Required for Assessing Horse Welfare. Animals, 12(23), 3385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12233385

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop