Relationship between Blood Parameters and Outcome in Rescued Roe Deer
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population and Sample Collection
2.2. Blood Analysis
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Carnevali, L.; Pedrotti, L.; Riga, F.; Toso, S. Banca Dati Ungulati: Status, Distribuzione, Consistenza, Gestione e Prelievo Venatorio Delle Popolazioni Di Ungulati in Italia. Rapporto 2001–2005. Biol. Cons. Fauna 2009, 117, 77–92. [Google Scholar]
- Toscana, R. Risultati di Applicazione Della Legge Regionale n. 10 del 9 Febbraio 2016 “Legge Obiettivo per la Gestione Degli Ungulati in Toscana”, 2018.
- Hewison, A.J.; Vincent, J.P.; Joachim, J.; Angibault, J.M.; Cargnelutti, B.; Cibien, C. The effects of woodland fragmentation and human activity on roe deer distribution in agricultural landscapes. Can. J. Zool. 2001, 79, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jepsen, J.U.; Topping, C.J. Modelling Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a Gradient of Forest Fragmentation: Behavioural Plasticity and Choice of Cover. Can. J. Zool. 2004, 82, 1528–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morellet, N.; van Moorter, B.; Cargnelutti, B.; Angibault, J.M.; Lourtet, B.; Merlet, J.; Ladet, S.; Hewison, A.J.M. Landscape Composition Influences Roe Deer Habitat Selection at Both Home Range and Landscape Scales. Landsc. Ecol. 2011, 26, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pewsner, M.; Origgi, F.C.; Frey, J.; Ryser-Degiorgis, M.P. Assessing Fifty Years of General Health Surveillance of Roe Deer in Switzerland: A Retrospective Analysis of Necropsy Reports. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pacini, M.I.; Bonelli, F.; Briganti, A.; Citi, S.; Papini, R.A.; Sgorbini, M. Wildlife Ungulate Rescue and Emergency Services in the Pisa Area (Tuscany, Italy): Evaluation of a 9-Years Period (2010–2018). Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nocera, I.; Puccinelli, C.; Sgorbini, M.; Scoccianti, S.; Aloisi, M.; Biliotti, C.; Citi, S. Deer Rescue in Tuscany: Retrospective Analysis and Assessment of Radiography Diagnoses. Animals 2021, 11, 3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madsen, A.B.; Strandgaard, H.; Prang, A. Factors Causing Traffic Killings of Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus in Denmark. Wildl. Biol. 2002, 8, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putzu, N.; Bonetto, D.; Civallero, V.; Fenoglio, S.; Meneguz, P.G.; Preacco, N.; Tizzani, P. Temporal Patterns of Ungulate-Vehicle Collisions in a Subalpine Italian Region. Ital. J. Zool. 2014, 81, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cserkész, T.; Ottlecz, B.; Cserkész-Nagy, Á.; Farkas, J. Interchange as the Main Factor Determining Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Hotspots on the Fenced Highways: Spatial Analysis and Applications. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2013, 59, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Morales, B.; Díaz-Varela, E.R.; Marey-Pérez, M.F. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Vehicle Collisions Involving Wild Boar and Roe Deer in NW Spain. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013, 60, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masciarelli, L. Fauna Guida Sicura Fauna Selvatica e Sicurezza Stradale a Cura Di; Assessorato Alla Difesa Fauna: Pisa, Italy, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Georgofili. La Gestione Della Fauna Selvatica Ungulata Tra Insostenibilità Dei Danni in Agricoltura, Tutele e Opportunità–Accademia Dei Georgofili. Quad. Dei Georg. Ed. Polistampa 2017, 174. Available online: https://www.georgofili.net/articoli/la-gestione-della-fauna-selvatica-ungulata-tra-insostenibilit-dei-danni-in-agricoltura-tutele-e-oppo/4513 (accessed on 4 December 2022).
- Valente, A.M.; Acevedo, P.; Figueiredo, A.M.; Fonseca, C.; Torres, R.T. Overabundant Wild Ungulate Populations in Europe: Management with Consideration of Socio-Ecological Consequences. Mamm. Rev. 2020, 50, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carradori, R. Fauna Selvatica e Incidenti Stradali. Biol. Ambient. 2010, 24, 80–87. [Google Scholar]
- Ponzetta, P.; Sorbetti Guerri, F. Gli Incidenti Stradali Causati Dalla Fauna Selvatica in Toscana. Analisi Del Fenomeno Nel Periodo 2001–2008. 2009, pp. 2–88. Available online: https://www.regione.toscana.it/-/gli-incidenti-stradali-causati-dalla-fauna-selvatica-nella-regione-toscana (accessed on 4 December 2022).
- Spraker, T. Stress and Capture Myopathy in Artiodactylids. In Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine: Current Therapy; W.B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1993; pp. 481–488. [Google Scholar]
- Montané, J.; Marco, I.; Manteca, X.; López, J.; Lavín, S. Delayed Acute Capture Myopathy in Three Roe Deer. J. Vet. Med. Ser. A Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 2002, 49, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Breed, D.; Meyer, L.C.R.; Steyl, J.C.A.; Goddard, A.; Burroughs, R.; Kohn, T.A. Conserving Wildlife in a Changing World: Understanding Capture Myopathy–A Malignant Outcome of Stress during Capture and Translocation. Conserv. Physiol. 2019, 7, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nisbet, H.Ö.; Ahmet, Ö.; Yardimci, C.; Sirin, Y.S. Treatment Results of Traumatic Injuries in 20 Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus): A Retrospective Study. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2010, 16, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mullineaux, E. Veterinary Treatment and Rehabilitation of Indigenous Wildlife. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2014, 55, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molina-López, R.A.; Casal, J.; Darwich, L. Causes of Morbidity in Wild Raptor Populations Admitted at a Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre in Spain from 1995–2007: A Long Term Retrospective Study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Griffith, J.E.; Dhand, N.K.; Krockenberger, M.B.; Higgins, D.P. A Retrospective Study of Admission Trends of Koalas to a Rehabilitation Facility over 30 Years. J. Wildl. Dis. 2013, 49, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gourlay, P.; Decors, A.; Moinet, M.; Lambert, O.; Lawson, B.; Beaudeau, F.; Assié, S. The Potential Capacity of French Wildlife Rescue Centres for Wild Bird Disease Surveillance. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2014, 60, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burroughes, N.D.; Dowler, J.; Burroughes, G. Admission and Survival Trends in Hedgehogs Admitted to RSPCA Wildlife Rehabilitation Centres. Proc. Zool. Soc. 2021, 74, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lukešová, G.; Voslarova, E.; Vecerek, V.; Vucinic, M. Trends in Intake and Outcomes for European Hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) in the Czech Rescue Centers. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montané, J.; Marco, I.; López-Olvera, J.; Manteca, X.; Lavín, S. Transport Stress in Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus): Effect of a Short-Acting Antipsychotic. Anim. Welf. 2002, 11, 405–417. [Google Scholar]
- Žele, D.; Vengušt, G. Biochemical Indicators in Serum of Free-Ranging Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Slovenia. Acta Vet. Brno 2012, 81, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Küker, S.; Huber, N.; Evans, A.; Kjellander, P.; Bergvall, U.A.; Jones, K.L.; Arnemo, J.M. Hematology, Serum Chemistry, and Serum Protein Electrophoresis Ranges for Free-Ranging Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Sweden. J. Wildl. Dis. 2015, 51, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorenzo, E.D.; Rossi, R.; Ferrari, F.; Martini, V.; Comazzi, S. Blood L-Lactate Concentration as an Indicator of Outcome in Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) Admitted to a Wildlife Rescue Center. Animals 2020, 10, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Høye, T.T. Age determination in roe deer—A new approach to tooth wear evaluated on known age in dividuals. Acta Thériol. 2006, 51, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smitt, M.B.; Chan, Y.W.; Dolci, A.; Kellogg, M.D.; McCudden, C.R.; McLean, M.; Miller, J.J.; Zakowski, J. Hemolysis, Icterus, and Lipemia/Turbidity Indices as Indicators of Interference in Clinical Laboratory Analysis; Approved Guideline; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wine, PA, USA, 2012; p. 7995. ISBN 156238. [Google Scholar]
- Kałuziński, J. Roe Deer Mortality Due to Mechanization of Work in Agrocenoses. Acta Theriol. 1982, 27, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jarnemo, A. Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus Fawns and Mowing–Mortality Rates and Countermeasures. Wildl. Biol. 2002, 8, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarnemo, A. Neonatal Mortality in Roe Deer; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004; ISBN 9157667055. [Google Scholar]
- Putman, R.J. A Review of Available Data on Natural Mortality of Red and Roe Deer Populations; Deer Commission for Scotland Press: Inverness, Scotland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Cukor, J.; Havránek, F.; Vacek, Z.; Bukovjan, K.; Podrázský, V.; Sharma, R.P. Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus) Mortality in Relation to Fodder Harvest in Agricultural Landscape. Mammalia 2019, 83, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blunt, M.H.; Blalock, E.; Kitchens, J.; Huisman, T.H.J. Effect of Severe Hemorrhage on the Hemoglobins of a Virginian White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1968, 127, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M.L.; Allison, R.W. Evaluation of the Ruminant Complete Blood Cell Count. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2007, 23, 377–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Latimer, K.S. Duncan & Prasse’s Veterinary Laboratory Medicine: Clinical Pathology, 5th ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-0-813-82014-9. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, B.P. Large Animal Internal Medicine; Mosby Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Samour, J.; Hart, M. Hawkey’s Atlas of Wild and Exotic Animal Haematology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Pugh, D.; Baird, N.; Edmondson, M.; Passler, T. Sheep, Goat, and Cervid Medicine; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Brooks, M.; Harr, K.; Seelig, D.; Wardrop, K.; Weiss, D. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Ritz, E.; Vanholder, R.; Ukrü, M.S.; Ukrü, U.; Lameire, N. Rhabdomyolysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000, 11, 1553–1561. [Google Scholar]
- Montané, J.; Marco, I.; López-Olvera, J.; Perpinán, D.; Manteca, X.; Lavín, S. Effects of Acepromazine on Capture Stress in Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus). J. Wildl. Dis. 2003, 39, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padilla, S.; Bouda, J.; Quiroz-Rocha, G.F.; Dávalos, J.L.; Sánchez, A. Biochemical and Haematological Values in Venous Blood of Captive Red Deer (Cervus laphus) at High Altitude. Acta Vet. Brno 2000, 69, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, K.E.; Roussel, A.J. Evaluation of the Ruminant Serum Chemistry Profile. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2007, 23, 403–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grotz, M.; Regel, G.; Dwenger, A.; Pape, H.C.; Hainer, C.; Vaske, R.; Tscherne, H. A Standardized Large Animal Model of Multiple Organ Failure after Severe Trauma. Unfallchirurg 1995, 98, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
- Nakatani, T.; Sakamoto, Y.; Ando, H.; Kobayashi, K. Bile and Bilirubin Excretion in Relation to Hepatic Energy Status during Hemorrhagic Shock and Hypoxemia in Rabbits. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 1995, 39, 665–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labori, K.J.; Raeder, M.G. Diagnostic Approach to the Patient with Jaundice Following Trauma. Scand. J. Surg. 2004, 93, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- López-Olvera, J.R.; Marco, I.; Montané, J.; Casa-Díaz, E.; Lavín, S. Effects of Acepromazine on the Stress Response in Southern Chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) Captured by Means of Drive-Nets. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2007, 71, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Casas-Díaz, E.; Marco, I.; López-Olvera, J.R.; Mentaberre, G.; Lavín, S. Use of Acepromazine for Stress Control in Spanish Ibex (Capra pyrenaica) Captured by Drive-Net. Vet. J. 2010, 183, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Deceased | Survived | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Unweaned | Group A1 9/16 (56%) | Group A2 7/16 (44%) | 16/98 (16.3%) |
Weaned | Group B1 68/82 (68%) | Group B2 14/82 (32%) | 82/98 (83.7%) |
Total | 77/98 (78%) | 21/98 (22%) | 98 |
Group A1 | Group A2 | Group B1 | Group B2 | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collision with vehicle | 2/9 (22%) | 1/7 (14%) | 57/68 (84%) | 10/14 (71%) | 70/98 (71%) |
Entrapment in nets | 1/9 (11%) | - | 2/68 (3%) | 1/14 (7%) | 4/98 (4%) |
Trauma from agricultural machinery | 5/9 (56%) | - | 1/68 (1%) | - | 6/98 (6%) |
Predation | - | - | 1/68 (1%) | - | 1/98 (1%) |
Unjustified rescue | 1/9 (11%) | 3/7 (43%) | - | - | 4/98 (4%) |
Systemic diseases | - | - | 1/68 (1%) | - | 1/98 (1%) |
Unknown | - | 3/7 (43%) | 6/68 (9%) | 3/14 (22%) | 12/98 (13%) |
Total | 9 | 7 | 68 | 14 | 98 |
Group A1 | Group A2 | Group B1 | Group B2 | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Limb fracture/luxation | 4/9 (45%) | 1/7 (14%) | 18/68 (27%) | 1/14 (7%) | 24/98 (21%) |
Rib fracture | - | - | 4/68 (6%) | - | 4/98 (4%) |
Pelvis fracture | - | - | 6/68 (9%) | - | 6/98 (6%) |
Head trauma | - | 1/7 (14%) | 3/68 (4%) | 4/14 (29%) | 8/98 (8%) |
Abdominal trauma | 3/68 (4%) | 1/14 (7%) | 4/98 (4%) | ||
Vertebral fracture/luxation | 1/9 (11%) | - | 10/68 (15%) | - | 11/98 (11%) |
Soft tissue wounds (skin, muscle) | 2/9 (22%) | 3/7 (43%) | 3/68 (4%) | 8/14 (57%) | 16/98 (6%) |
Multiple traumas | 2/9 (22%) | - | 21/68 (31%) | - | 23/98 (24%) |
No lesions | - | 2/7 (29%) | - | - | 2/98 (2%) |
Total | 9/98 | 7/98 | 68/98 | 14/98 | 98 |
Group A1 n = 8 | Group A2 n = 6 | Group B1 n = 59 | Group B2 n = 13 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBC (M/mL) | 8.6 4.1–12.8 | 7.5 6.7–9.8 | 10.1 0.9–14.1 | 9.4 8.2–10.5 | ||||
HCT (%) | 45.4 18.1–62.6 | 31.6 24.3–41.2 | 43.4 3.9–63.1 | 39.7 32.9–45.9 | ||||
HGB (g/dL) | 14 4.4–20.1 | 9.5 8.1–14.2 | 14.1 1.5–20.8 | 13.7 11.7–16 | ||||
MCV (fL) | 45 * 31.0–55.4 | 41.5 ** 33.0–44.9 | 42.8 32.6–50 | 43.9 39.8–47.3 | ||||
MCH (pg) | 14.6 * 7.5–17.1 | 12.7 ** 11.1–14.5 | 14.2 10.7–16.3 | 14.5 13.7–15.6 | ||||
MCHC (g/dL) | 32.1 24.3–37.2 | 31.1 29.2–35.3 | 33.2 26.8–38.5 | 34.5 31.9–35.6 | ||||
PLT (K/mL) | 301 102–832 | 506 231–664 | 182 7–514 | 194.5 74–203 | ||||
WBC (K/mL) | 7.5 2.2–11.4 | 3.8 2.5–8.9 | 4.6 1.1–12.4 | 6.5 1.6–8 | ||||
109/L | % | 109/L | % | 109/L | % | 109/L | % | |
Neutrophil | 5.1 0.9–8.2 | 69 26–76 | 1.9 0.6–6.9 | 47 24–78 | 2.4 0.2–9 | 55 8–96 | 2.5 0.6–6.6 | 53 28–98 |
Band neutrophil | 0.1 0–0.6 | 1.5 0–15 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–1.6 | 0 0–16 | 0 0–2.6 | 0 0–24 |
Lymphocyte | 1.5 0.7–2.5 | 25 10–54 | 1.7 1.2–2.7 | 50 13–59 | 1.6 0–4.3 | 32 2–82 | 2.2 0–4.1 | 36 0–62 |
Monocyte | 0.2 0.1–0.7 | 5 1–8 | 0.5 1–0.8 | 9 3–25 | 0.1 0–1.3 | 4 0–23 | 0.2 0–0.7 | 4 0–10 |
Eosinophil | 0 0–0 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–2.9 | 0 0–54 | 0.1 0–0.5 | 2 0–10 |
Basophil | 0 0–0 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–0.3 | 0 0–4 | 0 0–0 | 0 0–1 |
Group A1 n = 9 | Group A2 n = 7 | Group B1 n = 68 | Group B2 n = 14 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GGT (U/L) | 92.6 57.4−563.6 | 104 50–479 | 92.3 30–593.5 | 78 52.9–185 |
AST (U/L) | 262 2–8865 | 54 33–18,000 | 964 133–14,272 | 397 282–1578 |
CK (U/L) | 8865 * 116–19,538 | 108 * 70–501 | 9720 106–166,960 | 4410 1617–8148 |
UREA (mmol/L) | 9.8 1.3–34.1 | 10.1 0.3–25 | 12.2 0.7–76.1 | 10.1 4.3–21 |
CREA (umol/L) | 123.8 * 61.9–353.7 | 79.6 ** 70.7–114.9 | 159.2 88.4–486.3 | 114.9 79.6–265.3 |
TOT BIL (umol/L) | 18.8 * 3.4–218.9 | 3.4 ** 3.4–6.8 | 15.4 § 1.7–218.9 | 11.9 §§ 5.1–30.8 |
DIR BIL (umol/L) | 5.1 * 1.7–102.6 | 1.7 ** 1.7–11.9 | 3.4 0–116.3 | 1.7 1.3–30.8 |
IND BIL (umol/L) | 3.4 * 1.5–116.3 | 1.7 ** 1.7–130 | 10.2 0–116.3 | 8.5 5.1–10.2 |
TP (g/L) | 59 49–74 | 55 50–70 | 64 42–101 | 71 53–97 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pacini, M.I.; Bonelli, F.; Lubas, G.; Sgorbini, M. Relationship between Blood Parameters and Outcome in Rescued Roe Deer. Animals 2022, 12, 3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243469
Pacini MI, Bonelli F, Lubas G, Sgorbini M. Relationship between Blood Parameters and Outcome in Rescued Roe Deer. Animals. 2022; 12(24):3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243469
Chicago/Turabian StylePacini, Maria Irene, Francesca Bonelli, George Lubas, and Micaela Sgorbini. 2022. "Relationship between Blood Parameters and Outcome in Rescued Roe Deer" Animals 12, no. 24: 3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243469
APA StylePacini, M. I., Bonelli, F., Lubas, G., & Sgorbini, M. (2022). Relationship between Blood Parameters and Outcome in Rescued Roe Deer. Animals, 12(24), 3469. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12243469