Next Article in Journal
A Multi-Institutional Collaboration to Understand Neoplasia, Treatment and Survival of Snakes
Previous Article in Journal
The Impacts of Drought on the Health and Demography of Eastern Grey Kangaroos
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/ani12030257
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Aerobic Exercise Training on the Growth, Swimming Performance, Antipredation Ability and Immune Parameters of Juvenile Rock Carp (Procypris rabaudi)

by
Qimiao Hou
1,
Shijian Fu
1,
Tiji Huang
1,
Xiuming Li
1,* and
Xiaotao Shi
2,*
1
Laboratory of Evolutionary Physiology and Behavior, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Animal Biology, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China
2
Hubei International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Fish Passage, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(3), 257; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030257
Submission received: 28 November 2021 / Revised: 15 January 2022 / Accepted: 18 January 2022 / Published: 21 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Aquatic Animals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The artificial release of hatchery fish has not achieved expected results, mainly due to the low survival rate of the fish after being released into the natural environment. Many studies have shown that the implementation of pro-released training can improve the survival rate of hatchery fish. Rock carp (Procypris rabaudi) is a rare breed of fish in the upper and middle reaches of the Yangtze River. The aim of this study is to investigate whether aerobic exercise training has positive effects on the growth, swimming ability, antipredation ability and immunologic function before releasing the species into the wild. The findings from this study indicate that the training regime at close to 2–4 bl s−1 for 20 h per day for 42 days prior to release might be a suitable strategy to promote the survival rate of released juvenile rock carp in the wild.

Abstract

Many studies have found that aerobic exercise training at a moderate water velocity can improve the growth, swimming performance and survival rate of fish. To investigate the effects of aerobic exercise training on the growth, swimming performance, antipredation ability and immune parameters of rock carp, juveniles were placed in training channels with different water velocities (i.e., 3 cm s−1, 1 (body length s−1) bl s−1, 2 bl s−1 and 4 bl s−1) for 6 weeks. Then, the specific growth rate, critical swimming speed (Ucrit) and its metabolism, constant acceleration speed (Ucat), survival rate under predation, spleen index, lysozyme (LZM) activity and immunoglobulin (IgM) level were measured. Training showed no significant effect on the length-specific growth rate, weight-specific growth rate, Ucrit, maximum metabolic rate (MMR), metabolic scope (MS), Ucat or spleen index. The resting metabolic rates (RMRs) of the 2 bl s−1 and 4 bl s−1 training groups were significantly higher than those of the control group and 1 bl s−1 training group. The survival rate of the 1 bl s−1 training group in the presence of predators was significantly higher than that of the control group but significantly lower than those of the 2 bl s−1 and 4 bl s−1 training groups. The LZM activity of the 4 bl s−1 training group was significantly higher than that of the control group. The IgM level of the 2 bl s−1 training group was significantly higher than that of the control group. These data indicate that aerobic exercise training does not improve the growth and swimming performance of juvenile rock carp but can improve their antipredation ability and immunologic function.

1. Introduction

The growth, reproduction and survival of fish are significantly affected by various environmental factors in nature, such as temperature, food and predators [1,2,3]. Due to the alternation of the dry season and rainy season and the construction of artificial water conservation facilities, the water velocity in a fish habitat often changes significantly. The fluctuation in water current can stimulate the sensory and motor organs of fish, which generate corresponding modes of motion and rejection mechanisms and have an influence on the tissue morphology, exercise physiology and individual behavior of fish [4,5,6]. Fish often can swim against a water current and make ideal subjects for studies on the effects of exercise training [7]. According to the demand for oxygen, the movement of fish can be divided into two types: aerobic and anaerobic [8]. Therefore, exercise training protocols have been categorized as aerobic or anaerobic in fish [6,7,9]. Aerobic exercise training usually occurs in a continuous, uninterrupted manner. The duration ranges from 2 weeks to 1 year, and the energy for aerobic metabolism is mainly provided by red muscles during training [7,10,11]. Studies have found that aerobic exercise training can have significant effects on the growth performance, spontaneous behavior and swimming ability of fish [7,12,13,14].
As a way of escaping, predating and breeding, swimming performance is important for the survival of fish and is an important parameter that can be used to evaluate the adaptability of fish to the natural environment and to design fishways [3,15,16,17]. Critical swimming speed (Ucrit) is an important indicator that is widely used to determine the aerobic exercise ability of fish and is closely related to their activities, such as foraging and migrating [2,15,16,18]. Constant acceleration speed (Ucat) is an important index widely used to evaluate the anaerobic exercise ability of fish, which is closely related to their ability to swim in rapids and avoid predators [16,19,20]. Normally, the swimming abilities of fish have strong plasticity. Numerous studies have found that the swimming performances of many kinds of fish, such as common carp (Cyprinus carpio), darkbarbel catfish (Pelteobagrus vacheli), qingbo (Spinibarbus sinensis) and bream (Megalobrama pellegrini), have been significantly improved after exercise training [6,21,22,23]. More importantly, it has been found that improved swimming performance can enhance antipredation capacity and thus improve the survival rate of individuals [23]. In addition, the immune parameters of fish are closely related to their survival rate, so they have received extensive attention [24,25,26]. Many researchers have found that proper exercise can clearly promote the immune parameters of fish, but the training effect is closely linked to the kinds of fish and training parameters, such as type, intensity and duration [25,26,27,28,29,30,31].
Rock carp (Procypris rabaudi) is a species of bony fish in the family Cyprinidae. This species lives in the cracks between rocks at the bottom of the Yangtze River with some natural predators such as snakehead (Channa argus) and southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis). It is a rare breed of fish in the upper and middle reaches of the Yangtze River [32]. In recent years, the wild population of this species has diminished because of overfishing and habitat destruction. In the China Red Book of Endangered Animals (fish), it is an endangered species [33]. Meanwhile, it has a relatively low swimming ability in cyprinid fish and is an important kind of fish for proliferation and release in the field [34]. A previous study found that anaerobic exercise training (exhaustive chasing training, once daily for 21 days) had negative impacts on the growth performance and the resting metabolic rate (RMR) of the species [35]. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate whether aerobic exercise training has positive effects on growth, swimming ability, antipredation ability and immunologic function before releasing the endangered species into the wild. To achieve these aims, we assessed the specific growth rate (SGR), Ucat, Ucrit and metabolic rate, survival under predation, spleen index, LZM activity and IgM level in juvenile rock carp after aerobic exercise training under different water velocities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Juvenile rock carp were obtained from a fisheries hatchery (Yongchuan, Chongqing, China) and were acclimated in a recirculating system (250 L) for 4 weeks prior to the experiment. The fish were fed twice a day (09:00 and 18:00) to satiation using commercial food (Tongwei Company, Sichuan, composition: 41.2 ± 0.9% protein, 8.5 ± 0.5% lipid, 25.7 ± 1.2% carbohydrate and 12.3 ± 0.4% ash). The predators, i.e., snakehead (Channa argus) (n = 12, 200–300 g, 25–29 cm), were also obtained from the same fisheries hatchery and fed to satiation with cutlets of freshly killed loach once daily (10:00) in another recirculating system (250 L). Uneaten food and feces were removed with a siphon 1 h after feeding. During this period, the water temperature was controlled at 25 ± 1 °C, and the oxygen content of the water was maintained above 7.0 mg L−1. A third of the total water volume was replaced daily, and the photoperiod was 12 h light–12 h dark.

2.2. Aerobic Exercise Training Protocol

At the end of the acclimation period, 240 fish of similar size ((3.95 ± 0.06) g, (6.30 ± 0.03) cm) were randomly divided into a control group and 1 bl s−1 (body length per second), 2 bl s−1 and 4 bl s−1 training groups, and they were placed in four separate channels of the self-developed “Fish Swimming Sports Training Instrument” [12]. The instrument consists of a water-processing and temperature-controlling system and a tank (length, 190 cm; width, 110 cm; depth, 25 cm) containing four training channels. Continuous water velocities in the experimental channel were achieved via the motors (30 w) with a propeller. Different water velocities were produced by controlling the different voltages of transducer power. Each group (60 fish, 3 replicates and 20 fish per replicate) was evenly divided into 3 cells (20 fish per cell) of a channel. The control group was placed in a channel with a water velocity of 3 cm s−1. The 1 bl s−1, 2 bl s−1 and 4 bl s−1 groups were trained for 20 h each day at the corresponding training water velocity, and the aerobic training lasted for 6 weeks. The rearing conditions during training were the same as those during the acclimation period.

2.3. Parameter Measurements

2.3.1. Measurement of Growth Rate

Before and after the training, the body weight of the fish was weighed by electronic scales (accurate to 0.1 g), and the body length (standard length) of the fish was measured by a ruler (accurate to 0.1 cm). The growth rate of the experimental fish was calculated as follows:
Weight-specific growth rate (%/d) = 100 × (LnW2 − LnW1)/T
Length-specific growth rate (%/d) = 100 × (LnL2 − LnL1)/T
where W1 and W2 are the body weights of the experimental fish before and after aerobic exercise training, respectively; L1 and L2 are the body lengths of the experimental fish before and after aerobic exercise training, respectively; and T is the duration of the experiment (42 days).

2.3.2. Measurement of Ucat

Ucat was measured by Blazka-type swim tunnel respirometers (volume, 3.5 L) [6]. The fish were individually (n = 9, Table 1) transferred into the swim tunnel for 1 h of acclimation, and the water velocity was 6 cm/s (i.e., 1 body length s−1). The flow of aerated water through the respirometer was maintained continuously during this recovery period. After acclimation, the water velocity in the swim tunnel continuously increased at a rate of 0.1667 cm s−2 (10 cm s−1 min−1). A computer outputted various electric pulses to the stepping motor of the swimming tunnel respirometer and thus changed the water velocity in the tunnel. The water was accelerated at this rate until the fish were exhausted. The water velocity when the fish were exhausted was the Ucat value [16,19]. The criterion of exhaustion was that the fish were unable to swim forward and stayed for more than 20 s in the rear honeycomb screen of the swimming chamber [9].

2.3.3. Measurements of Ucrit and the Metabolic Rate

Ucrit was also determined by Blazka-type swim tunnel respirometers (volume, 3.5 L) [6]. The fish were individually (n = 9, Table 1) transferred into the swim tunnel for 6 h of acclimation, and the water velocity was 6 cm/s (i.e., 1 body length s−1). After acclimation, the water velocity was increased at an increment of 6 cm/s in closed mode, and the continuous swimming duration at each water speed was 20 min. The experiment was stopped when the experimental fish showed exhaustion. The criterion of exhaustion was that the fish were unable to swim forward and stayed for more than 20 s in the rear honeycomb screen of the swimming chamber [2]. Each fish was analyzed using Brett’s equation to calculate the Ucrit:
Ucrit = [V + (T/ΔT) ΔV]
where V is the highest speed at which the fish swam for the full time period (cm s−1); T is the duration for which the fish swam at the final speed (min); ΔT is the prescribed period of swimming at that speed (i.e., 20 min); and ΔV is the velocity increment (i.e., 6 cm/s).
The metabolic rate (MO2) of each fish while swimming was measured during the measurement of Ucrit. The specific purpose was to measure the dissolved oxygen value of the water body close to the oxygen meter every 2 min. The absolute value of the slope of the dissolved oxygen value over time and the volume of the water were used to calculate the metabolic rate of each experimental fish during the exercise. At the end of the experiment, the fish were removed, the swimming metabolometer was closed, and the oxygen consumption rate was measured for 20 min to eliminate the influence of bacterial oxygen consumption on the MO2 of the experimental fish. The calculation formula for MO2(mgO2 kg−1 h−1)) was as follows:
MO2 = (St − S0) × 60 × 3.45/m
where St is the slope of the dissolved oxygen value changing with time during each shift (20 min), S0 is the slope of the dissolved oxygen value changing with bacteria oxygen consumption, 3.45 is the volume of the swimming channel (L), 60 is 60 min and m is the body weight (kg) of the fish. The maximum observed O2 during the Ucrit test was defined as the maximum metabolic rate (MMR). The RMR was estimated by exponentially fitting O2 as a function of steady swimming speeds and extrapolating back to speed zero, while the metabolic scope (MS) was the difference between the MMR and RMR.

2.3.4. Measurement of the Immune Parameters

Six fish from each group (i.e., two fish per cell, Table 1) were randomly selected under mild anesthesia (MS−222, 50 mg/L). The body weight of the fish was weighed with an electronic balance (accurate to 0.0001 g), and the body length of the fish was measured with a ruler (accurate to 0.1 cm). Then, the spleen of the fish was removed and weighed (accurate to 0.0001 g).
Spleen index (‰) = spleen weight/body weight × 1000
Twelve fish from each group (i.e., four fish per cell) were sampled to determine immune parameters. The fish were rapidly placed in water containing a concentration of anesthetic (MS−222, 50 mg/L, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). The tail of the fish was cut off, and blood samples were collected immediately. Following centrifugation (3000 r/min for 10 min), the serum was separated and stored at −20 °C for the determination of the LZM activity and IgM level. The LZM activities were determined according to the turbidimetric method [36] using commercial test kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Institute, Nanjing, China). The IgM levels were measured according to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [37] using commercial test kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Institute, Nanjing, China).

2.3.5. Measurement of Antipredation Ability

To measure the antipredation ability of juvenile rock carp, sixteen fish from each group were selected and tagged with a visible implant elastomer and allowed to recover for 24 h. All predators were fasted for 24 h prior to the experiment. Four fish (16 in total, Table 1) were selected from each of the four groups, and two predators (body length, 25–29 cm; body weight, 200–300 g) were placed together in the experimental water tank (length, 80 cm; width, 80 cm; height, 50 cm; volume, 200 L). The experiment was observed every 30 min and lasted between 20 and 30 h. The experiment was stopped when half of the fish in the experimental water tank were eaten by the predators. The experiments were repeated in four identical tanks, i.e., n = 4 [9].

2.4. Data Analysis

The experimental data were calculated by Excel and analyzed by SPSS 17.0. The effects of aerobic exercise training on all parameters were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. The effects of aerobic exercise training and water velocity on the metabolic rate were assessed using a two-way ANOVA. The ANOVA was followed by a least-significant-difference multiple-comparison test when appropriate. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05, and values were presented as the mean (±SE).

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

There were no significant differences in terminal body weight, terminal body length, specific body weight growth rate or specific body length growth rate between the training groups (1, 2 and 4 bl s−1) and the control group (Table 2).

3.2. Swimming Ability and Metabolic Rate

There were no significant differences in Ucrit (44.80, 42.33, 45.33 and 45.93 cm s−1), Ucat (74.08, 75.82, 75.13 and 78.23 cm s−1), MMR (737.87, 747.75, 727.89 and 799.49 mgO2 kg−1 h−1) or MS (627.99, 634.73, 591.09 and 656.97 mgO2 kg−1 h−1) between the control group and the training groups (1, 2 and 4 bl s−1) (Table 3, Figure 1). The RMRs in the 2 bl s−1 and 4 bl s−1 training groups (136.79 and 142.52 mgO2 kg−1 h−1, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the control group and the 1 bl s−1 training group (109.87 and 113.02 mgO2 kg−1 h−1, respectively) (F3,35 = 8.330, p < 0.001) (Table 3, Figure 1C). With increasing water velocity, the metabolic rate of juvenile fish in each group significantly increased (F7,265 = 83.262; p < 0.001) (Figure 2 and Table 4).

3.3. Antipredation Ability

The survival rate of the fish in the 1 bl s−1 training group (37.50%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (18.75%) in the presence of predators. There was no significant difference in the survival rates between the 2 bl s−1 and 4 bl s−1 training groups (68.75 and 75.00%, respectively) in the presence of predators. However, the survival rates of the 2 bl s−1 and 4 bl s−1 training groups were significantly higher than those of the 1 bl s−1 training group and the control group (F3,15 = 8.407, p = 0.003) (Table 3, Figure 3).

3.4. Immune Parameters

There was no significant difference in the spleen index between the training groups (0.37, 0.30 and 0.47‰, respectively) and the control group (0.27‰) (Table 3, Figure 4). The LZM activity of the 4 bl s−1 training group (16.23 μg mL−1) was significantly higher than these of the other three groups (5.16, 5.05 and 5.73 μg mL−1, respectively) (F3,23 = 4.629, p = 0.014) (Table 3, Figure 5A). The IgM level of the 2 bl s−1 training group (13.59 mg mL−1) was significantly higher than those of the other three groups (5.50, 6.58 and 6.12 mg mL−1, respectively) (F3,23 = 9.547, p < 0.001) (Table 3, Figure 5B)

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Aerobic Exercise Training on the Growth of Juvenile Rock Carp

The effects of exercise training on fish growth are related to the training methods, training duration, training equipment and water velocity [7,12,22,30]. Most studies have found that anaerobic exercise usually has a negative impact on the growth of fish [22,35,38,39], while aerobic exercise training at an appropriate water velocity oppositely improves the growth of fish [4,5,28,40]. Moreover, the effect of exercise training on growth performance is also dependent on the lifestyle of fish species [40,41,42]. For example, the growth performances of active swimmers, such as yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata) [40], the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) [28] and Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) [43], can be improved by aerobic exercise training at a moderate water velocity. In contrast, aerobic exercise training had negative effects on growth performances of some inactive swimmers, such as the rabbitfish (Siganus rivulatus) [42] and the Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) [41]. However, this study found that aerobic training had no significant effect on the growth ability of juvenile rock carp. This finding suggests that the growth capacity of juvenile rock carp did not benefit from continuous aerobic exercise, which may be related to the inactive lifestyle of the species.

4.2. Effect of Aerobic Training on Swimming Performance

Numerous studies have found that appropriate continuous aerobic training can improve the critical swimming speed of many fish, such as common carp [21] trained at 60% Ucrit speed for 28 days, black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus) [44] trained at 2 and 4 bl s−1 water velocity for 8 weeks and bream [6] trained at 4 bl s−1 water velocity for 5 weeks. However, this study found that Ucrit was not significantly different among the control and training groups. This result means that continuous aerobic training did not improve the swimming performance of the juvenile rock carp. This situation has been previously documented in fish species such as the leopard shark (approximately 0.7 bl s−1 for 6 weeks) [45] and chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) (Ucrit swim test on alternate days for 4 weeks) [46]. Some studies have found that the improvement in Ucrit from training fish is accompanied by an improvement in aerobic metabolism [22,47]. MMR and MS are widely accepted evaluation indexes of aerobic metabolic performance [6]. In this study, the difference in the MMR and MS between the training group and the control group was not obvious. This scenario may be one reason why aerobic training did not improve the Ucrit of the rock carp.
Aerobic exercise training can affect the body shape and physical characteristics of fish and reduce phosphocreatine, the release of catecholamine and cortisol and the rate of lactate clearance in muscle and blood. These factors may affect the anaerobic exercise and metabolic ability of fish [3,7,48,49]. However, there are few reports about aerobic training on the anaerobic exercise and metabolic ability of fish. A recent study found that continuous aerobic training can improve the anaerobic exercise ability of Schizothorax wangchiachii (10 cm/s for 6 and 12 h per day for 30 days) [10]. In this study, the results showed that there was no significant difference in Ucat between the control group and the training group (6 weeks of training at a velocity of 1–4 bl s−1). These results show that continuous aerobic training did not improve the anaerobic exercise ability of the juvenile rock carp. Therefore, the influence of aerobic training on anaerobic exercise ability may be related to the species and training system of the fish. More study on the effects of aerobic training on the anaerobic exercise ability of fish with different habits and physiological and biochemical mechanisms may be conducive to revealing the internal causes of anaerobic exercise ability.

4.3. Effect of Aerobic Exercise Training on Antipredation Ability

One of the main purposes of fish exercise training research is to improve the survival rate of fish in the wild [7]. It has been found that the survival rate of chinook salmon and Atlantic salmon can be improved significantly through exercise training [50]. Short-term swimming training before release to the wild helps brown trout (Salmo trutta) obtain a much higher survival rate than the control group [51]. Furthermore, the survival rate of Chinese suckers (Myxocyprinus asiaticus) subjected to anaerobic exercise training was significantly reduced when attacked by predators [9]. Therefore, we expect aerobic exercise training to improve the antipredator ability of fish. As expected, we found that in the presence of predators, the survival rate of the training group (6 weeks at a velocity of 1–4 bl s−1) was notably higher than that of the control group, which indicates that continuous aerobic exercise training has noticeably enhanced the antipredator ability of juvenile rock carp. The Ucrit and Ucat are closely related to the survival rate of fish in the presence of predators [23]. However, aerobic exercise training did not improve the Ucrit and Ucat of juvenile rock carp. Those results suggested that the improved antipredation ability may not be related to the swimming performance of the species after aerobic exercise training. We found that the resting metabolic rate of the juvenile carp was remarkably higher than that of the control group, and these experimental data suggest that continuous aerobic exercise training obviously boosts the minimum energy demand of juvenile carp in maintaining fluid circulation, protein synthesis and osmotic pressure regulation; may shorten the emergency response time; and improves its ability to identify predators. This may be one of the reasons why the survival rate of the juvenile rock carp increased notably in the presence of predators after aerobic exercise training.

4.4. Effect of Exercise Training on Immune Response

The immune organ index is an important indicator reflecting the degree of immune organ development and is positively correlated with immune function in healthy fish [52]. Lysozyme is mainly found in neutrophils and monocytes, with lower activities also present in macrophages, and plays a key role in the nonspecific immune response in fish [31,53]. IgM actively performs many functions such as agglutination complement activation, enhancing cellular-mediated cytotoxicity, and neutralization of pathogens and is the primary immunoglobulin essential for defense mechanisms in fish [54,55]. Exercise training can have a significant impact on the immune parameters of fish, but its training effect is closely related to its training mode [26,30,31]. Anaerobic exercise training often has negative influences on the immune parameters of different kinds of fish. For example, exhaustion training (once daily or twice daily, 3 weeks) resulted in a decrease in LZM activity for qingbo [26]. However, a large number of studies have found that aerobic exercise training has a positive effect on the LZM activity of fish, such as tinfoil barb (Barbodes schwanenfeldii) (0.1 and 0.3 m/s, 45 days) [25], Prenant’s schizothoracin (Schizothorax prenanti) (1, 2 (bl) s−1, 8 weeks) [30] and tinfoil barb (0.66 bl/s, and 1.92 bl/s, 23 and 45 days) [31]. Aerobic exercise training (2 bl/s and 4 bl/s, 8 weeks) led to a significant increase in IgM level for qingbo [26]. In this study, LZM activity (4 bl s−1) and IgM level (2 bl s−1) of the training groups were significantly higher than those of the control group. These results indicated that continuous aerobic training (2–4 bl s−1) had a positive effect on the immune functions of the juvenile rock carp. Furthermore, this study found that the LZM activity of the 4 bl s−1 training group was the highest; however, the IgM level of the 2 bl s−1 training group was the highest after aerobic exercise training. The results may be due to the different effects of aerobic exercise training at the same water velocity on the different immune parameters of fish species. For example, aerobic exercise training at 2 and 4 bls −1 improved IgM levels for qingbo. However, this training regime did not have a significant effect on LZM activity of the species [26].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study found that aerobic training had no obvious effect on the growth performance of the juvenile rock carp. Furthermore, after aerobic training, the exercise ability of the juvenile rock carp was not significantly improved, which may be related to the fact that the MMR and MS were not greatly improved. However, aerobic exercise training (2 and 4 bl s−1) profoundly improved the antipredation ability of the juvenile rock carp, which may have been due to the significant shortening of its emergency response time with a consequently increased maintenance metabolic expenditure [23,56]. At the same time, aerobic exercise training at 2 and/or 4 bl s−1 also significantly improved the immune indexes, such as those of LZM and IgM, of the juvenile rock carp, which means that aerobic exercise training is beneficial for improving its immune function. Thus, aerobic exercise training at close to 2–4 bl s−1 for 20 h per day for 42 days prior to release appears to be a suitable regime for antipredation ability and immune function enhancement, thus potentially increasing the survivability of released juvenile rock carp in the wild.

Author Contributions

Q.H., T.H., X.L., X.S.; Conceptualization: X.L., X.S.; Methodology: X.L., X.S., S.F., Q.H.; Formal Analysis: X.L., Q.H.; Resources: Q.H., T.H.; Data curation: Q.H., T.H.; Writing—Original Draft: Q.H., X.L.; Writing—Review and Editing: S.F., X.S.; Funding acquisition: X.L., X.S., S.F., Q.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51922065, 31670418), Hubei International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Fish Passage (HIBF2020011), “Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle” project of science and technology research program of Chongqing Education Commission of China (KJCX2020023) and the Postgraduate Research Innovation Project of Chongqing Normal University (YKC20029).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study complied with the current law of the country in which it was performed and was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Key Laboratory of Animal Biology of Chongqing (Permit Number Zhao-20,151,010-01). The study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Animals at the Key Laboratory of Animal Biology of Chongqing, China. All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Deyong Pu for help with juvenile rock carp collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zaldúa, N.; Naya, D.E. Digestive flexibility during fasting in fish: A review. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2014, 169, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, C.G.; Farrell, A.P.; Lotto, A.; MacNutt, M.J.; Hinch, S.G.; Healey, M.C. The effect of temperature on swimming performance and oxygen consumption in adult sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) and coho (O. kisutch) salmon stocks. J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 206, 3239–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Fu, S.-J.; Cao, Z.; Yan, G.; Fu, C.; Pang, X. Integrating environmental variation, predation pressure, phenotypic plasticity and locomotor performance. Oecologia 2013, 173, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Song, B.L.; Lin, X.T.; Xu, Z.N. Effects of upstream exercise training on feeding efficiency, growth and nutritional components of juvenile tinfoil barbs (Barbodes schwanenfeldi). J. Fish. China 2012, 36, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, X.M.; Yu, L.J.; Wang, C.; Zeng, L.Q.; Cao, Z.D.; Fu, S.J.; Zhang, Y.G. The effect of aerobic exercise training on growth performance, digestive enzymes activities and postprandial metabolic response in juvenile qingbo (Spinibarbus sinensis). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 2013, 166, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, X.M.; Pang, X.; Zheng, H.; Li, X.J.; Fu, S.J.; Zhang, Y.G. Effects of prolonged exercise training and exhaustive chasing training on the swimming performance of an endangered bream Megalobrama pellegrini. Aquat. Biol. 2017, 26, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Davison, W. The effects of exercise training on teleost fish, a review of recent literature. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 1997, 117, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pearson, M.P.; Spriet, L.L.; Stevens, E.D. Effect of sprint training on swim performance and white muscle metabolism during exercise and recovery in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J. Exp. Biol. 1990, 149, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, L.Y.; Yan, X.Y.; Li, X.M.; Fu, X.; Xia, J.G.; Fu, S.J. Effect of exercise training on swimming performance, survival under predation and hypoxia tolerance in an endangered fish species in China. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 2019, 52, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, Y.; Wu, H.; Deng, L.J.; Li, T.C.; Yang, K.; Fu, S.J.; Song, Z.B. Improved aerobic and anaerobic swimming performance after exercise training and detraining in schizothorax wangchiachii: Implications for fisheries releases. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2020, 245, 110698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pang, X.; Yuan, X.Z.; Cao, Z.D.; Fu, S.J. The effects of temperature and exercise training on swimming performance in juvenile qingbo (Spinibarbus sinensis). J. Comp. Physiol. B 2012, 183, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Li, X.; Liu, L.; Yuan, J.; Xiao, Y.; Fu, S.; Zhang, Y. The effect of aerobic exercise and starvation on growth performance and postprandial metabolic response in juvenile southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2016, 193, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alcaraz, G.; Urrutia, V. Growth in response to sustained swimming in young montezumae swordtails, Xiphophorus montezumae. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 2008, 41, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arbeláez-Rojas, G.A.; Moraes, G. Optimization of sustaining swimming speed of matrinxã Brycon amazonicus: Performance and adaptive aspects. Sci. Agric. 2010, 67, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Plaut, I. Does pregnancy affect swimming performance of female Mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis? Funct. Ecol. 2010, 16, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marras, S.; Claireaux, G.; Mckenzie, D.J.; Nelson, J.A. Individual variation and repeatability in aerobic and anaerobic swimming performance of European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hatry, C.; Thiem, J.D.; Binder, T.R.; Hatin, D.; Dumont, P.; Stamplecoskie, K.M.; Molina, J.M.; Smokorowski, K.E.; Cooke, S.J. Comparative physiology and relative swimming performance of three redhorse (moxostoma spp.) species: Associations with fishway passage success. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2014, 87, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Plaut, I. Critical swimming speed: Its ecological relevance. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2001, 131, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reidy, S.P.; Kerr, S.R.; Nelson, J.A. Aerobic and anaerobic swimming performance of individual Atlantic cod. J. Exp. Biol. 2000, 203, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oufiero, C.E.; Garland, T. Repeatability and correlation of swimming performances and size over varying time-scales in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Funct. Ecol. 2009, 23, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, W.; Xia, W.; Cao, Z.D.; Fu, S.J. The effect of prolonged exercise training on swimming performance and the underlying biochemical mechanisms in juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2013, 166, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y.; Cao, Z.D.; Fu, S.J.; Peng, J.L.; Wang, Y.X. The effect of exhaustive chasing training and detraining on swimming performance in juvenile darkbarbel catfish (Peltebagrus vachelli). J. Comp. Physiol. B Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol. 2009, 179, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fu, S.J. Flow and stress acclimation both enhance predator avoidance in common cyprinid fish. Aquat. Biol. 2015, 24, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Li, L.; Wu, Z.H. Advances in fish humoral immunity. Mar. Sci. 2001, 25, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
  25. Song, B.L. Effect of Water Current on Swimming Activity, Growth and Ecophysiological Aspect of Young Barbodes Schwanenfeldi; Jinan University: Guangzhou, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yu, L.J. The Effects of Exercise Training on Growth, Antioxidative Ablility and Immune Functionin Juvenile Spinibarbus Sinensis; Southwest University: Chongqing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dong, P. Swimming Activities of Puffer Chrysanthemum and Its Effects on Respiratory Excretion and Nonspecific Immunity; Dalian Ocean University: Dalian, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  28. Castro, V.; Grisdale-Helland, B.; Helland, S.J.; Kristensen, T.; Jørgensen, S.M.J.; Helgerud, J.; Claireaux, G.; Farrell, A.P.; Krasnov, A.; Takle, H. Aerobic training stimulates growth and promotes disease resistance in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 2011, 160, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Azuma, T.; Noda, S.; Yada, T.; Ototake, M.; Nagoya, H.; Moriyama, S.; Yamada, H.; Nakanishi, T.; Lwata, M. Profiles in growth, smoltification, immune function and swimming performance of 1-year-old masu salmon Oncorhynchus masou masou reared in water flow. Fish. Sci. 2002, 68, 1282–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, G.; Wu, Y.; Qin, X.; Shi, X.; Wang, X. The effect of aerobic exercise training on growth performance, innate immune response and disease resistance in juvenile Schizothorax prenanti. Aquaculture 2018, 486, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, Z.; Song, B.; Lin, X.; Xu, Z. Effects of water-current speed on hematological, biochemical and immune parameters in juvenile tinfoil barb, Barbonymus schwanenfeldii (Bleeker, 1854). J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2016, 34, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cai, Y.Z.; Cai, Y.Q.; He, C.R.; Jiang, J. Preliminary studies on the biological characteristics of Procypris rabaudi (Tchang). J. Hydroecology 2003, 23, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, S.; Le, P.Q.; Chen, Y.Y. Red Book of Endangered Animals in China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1998; pp. 170–172. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yan, G.J.; He, X.K.; Cao, Z.D.; Fu, S.J. An interspecific comparison between morphology and swimming performance in cyprinids. J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26, 1802–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, X.M.; Yu, L.J.; Cao, Z.D.; Fu, S.J.; Zhang, Y.G. The effects of exhaustive chasing training on the growth performance and postprandial metabolic response in Spinibarbus sinensis and Procypris rabaudi. Freshw. Fish. 2013, 43, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hultmark, D.; Steiner, H.; Rasmuson, T.; Boman, H.G. Insect immunity. Purification and properties of three inducible bactericidal proteins from hemolymph of immunized pupae of Hyalophora cecropia. Eur. J. Biochem. 1980, 106, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nagae, M.; Fuda, H.; Hara, A.; Kawamura, H.; Yamauchi, K. Changes in serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) concentrations during early development of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) as determined by sensitive ELISA technique. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 1993, 106, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gamperl, A.K.; Bryant, J.; Stevens, E.D. Effect of a sprint training protocol on growth rate, conversion efficiency, food consumption and body composition of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J. Fish Biol. 1988, 33, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hernandez, M.D.; Mendiola, P.; de Costa, J.D.; Zamora, S. Effects of intense exercise training on rainbow trout growth, body composition and metabolic responses. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2002, 58, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yogata, H.Y.; Oku, H. The effects of swimming exercise on growth and whole-body protein and fat contents of fed and unfed fingerling yellowtail. Fish. Sci. 2000, 66, 1100–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yogata, H.Y.; Oku, H. Effects of water velocity on growth performance of juvenile Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2000, 31, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ghanawi, J.; Mohanna, C.; Saoud, I.P. Effect of continuous water movement on growth and body composition of juvenile Rabbitfish, Siganus rivulatus. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2010, 41, 834–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Christiansen, J.S.; Jobling, M. The behavior and the relationship between food intake and growth of juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, L., subjected to sustained exercise. Can. J. Zool. 1990, 68, 2185–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Zheng, H.; Peng, J.; Fu, S. Sustained exercise-trained juvenile black carp (mylopharyngodon piceus) at a moderate water velocity exhibit improved aerobic swimming performance and increased postprandial metabolic responses. Biol. Open 2018, 7, bio032425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gruber, S.J.; Dickson, K.A. Effects of endurance training in the leopard shark, Triakis semifasciata. Physiol. Zool. 1997, 70, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gallaugher, P.E.; Thorarensen, H.; Kiessling, A.; Farrell, A.P. Effects of high intensity exercise training on cardiovascular function, oxygen uptake, internal oxygen transport and osmotic balance in chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) during critical speed swimming. J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204, 2861–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, X.M.; Cao, Z.D.; Peng, J.L.; Fu, S.J. The effect of exercise training on the metabolic interaction between digestion and locomotion in juvenile darkbarbel catfish (Peltebagrus vachelli). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Physiol. 2010, 156, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Young, P.S.; Cech, J.J. Effects of exercise conditioning on stress responses and recovery in cultured and wild young-of-the-year striped bass, Morone saxatilis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1993, 50, 2094–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pakkasmaa, S.; Piironen, J. Water Velocity Shapes Juvenile Salmonids. Evol. Ecol. 2001, 14, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Burrows, R.E. The influence of fingerling quality on adult salmon survivals. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 1969, 98, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cresswell, R.C.; Williams, R. Post-stocking movements and recapture of hatchely-reared trout released into flowing waters-effect of prior acclimation to flow. J. Fish Biol. 1983, 23, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, M.; Yi, M.M.; Lu, M.X. Review on the fish health assessment. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 2019, 43, 226–232. [Google Scholar]
  53. Saurabh, S.; Sahoo, P.K. Lysozyme: An important defence molecule of fish innate immune system. Aquac. Res. 2008, 39, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Arnold, J.N.; Dwek, R.A.; Rudd, P.M.; Sim, R.B. Mannan binding lectin and its interaction with immunoglobulins in health and in disease. Immunol. Lett. 2006, 106, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Leya, T.; Ahmad, I.; Valappil, R.K.; Kurcheti, P.P.; Tripathi, G.; Sharma, R.; Bedekar, M.K. Development of species-specific IgM antibodies and elevation of mucosal immune response in Labeo rohita using recombinant bicistronic nano DNA vaccine priming. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2021, 113, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, X.; Zeng, L.Q.; Fu, S.J.; Peng, J.L.; Cao, Z.D. Intraspecific differences in standard metabolic rate and its correlations with locomotion and feeding metabolism in juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Chin. J. Zool. 2016, 51, 384–394. [Google Scholar]
Animals 12 00257 g001a 550Animals 12 00257 g001b 550
Figure 1. The effect of aerobic exercise training on Ucrit, Ucat, RMR, MMR and MS in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 9). (A). Ucrit; (B). Ucat; (C). RMR; (D). MMR; (E). MS. Values without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference.
Figure 1. The effect of aerobic exercise training on Ucrit, Ucat, RMR, MMR and MS in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 9). (A). Ucrit; (B). Ucat; (C). RMR; (D). MMR; (E). MS. Values without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference.
Animals 12 00257 g001aAnimals 12 00257 g001b
Animals 12 00257 g002 550
Figure 2. The effects of swimming speed on the oxygen consumption rate (MO2) in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 9) at different water velocities.
Figure 2. The effects of swimming speed on the oxygen consumption rate (MO2) in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 9) at different water velocities.
Animals 12 00257 g002
Animals 12 00257 g003 550
Figure 3. The effect of aerobic exercise training on survival under predation in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 4). Values without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference.
Figure 3. The effect of aerobic exercise training on survival under predation in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 4). Values without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference.
Animals 12 00257 g003
Animals 12 00257 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of aerobic exercise training on spleen index in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 6). Values without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference.
Figure 4. The effect of aerobic exercise training on spleen index in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 6). Values without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference.
Animals 12 00257 g004
Animals 12 00257 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of aerobic exercise training on the LZM activity and IgM level in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 6). (A). LZM; (B). IgM. Values without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference.
Figure 5. The effect of aerobic exercise training on the LZM activity and IgM level in juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 6). (A). LZM; (B). IgM. Values without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference.
Animals 12 00257 g005
Table
Table 1. Body mass and body length of the experimental fish in the present study (mean ± S.E.).
Table 1. Body mass and body length of the experimental fish in the present study (mean ± S.E.).
ParametersWater Velocity
Control1 bl s−12 bl s−14 bl s−1
Ucrit
Body mass (g)n = 94.47 ± 0.154.25 ± 0.184.07 ± 0.144.22 ± 0.28
Body length (cm)n = 96.66 ± 0.096.67 ± 0.126.43 ± 0.116.48 ± 0.09
Ucat
Body mass (g)n = 94.45 ± 0.104.54 ± 0.264.05 ± 0.164.57 ± 0.23
Body length (cm)n = 96.62 ± 0.076.53 ± 0.116.53 ± 0.086.72 ± 0.08
Survival rate
Body mass (g)n = 44.38 ± 0.163.77 ± 0.173.69 ± 0.173.15 ± 0.09
Body length (cm)n = 46.44 ± 0.086.26 ± 0.086.19 ± 0.086.01 ± 0.14
LZM
Body mass (g)n = 64.13 ± 0.174.84 ± 0.184.40 ± 0.123.99 ± 0.29
Body length (cm)n = 66.45 ± 0.136.71 ± 0.096.31 ± 0.076.15 ± 0.18
IgM
Body mass (g)n = 64.40 ± 0.325.07 ± 0.394.18 ± 0.363.75 ± 0.19
Body length (cm)n = 66.51 ± 0.136.70 ± 0.196.37 ± 0.186.18 ± 0.09
Spleen
Body mass (g)n = 64.23 ± 0.154.08 ± 0.284.52 ± 0.064.92 ± 0.54
Body length (cm)n = 66.58 ± 0.096.48 ± 0.136.60 ± 0.076.90 ± 0.09
Table
Table 2. The effect of aerobic exercise training on the growth performance of juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 3).
Table 2. The effect of aerobic exercise training on the growth performance of juvenile rock carp (mean ± S.E., n = 3).
ParametersTrainingResults of One-Way ANOVA
Control
Group		1 bl s−1
Training Group		2 bl s−1
Training Group		4 bl s−1
Training Group		Training Effect
Initial body weight (g)4.12 ± 0.234.04 ± 0.323.83 ± 0.203.82 ± 0.27F3,11 = 0.068; p = 0.396
Initial body length (cm)6.36 ± 0.096.29 ± 0.116.32 ± 0.076.23 ± 0.09F3,11 = 0.368; p = 0.788
Final body weight (g)4.38 ± 0.044.31 ± 0.284.08 ± 0.194.20 ± 0.11F3,11 = 0.518; p = 0.681
Final body length (cm)6.53 ± 0.066.52 ± 0.136.36 ± 0.086.41 ± 0.09F3,11 = 0.022; p = 0.800
Length-specific growth rate (% d−1)0.08 ± 0.020.09 ± 0.040.05 ± 0.030.08 ± 0.05F3,11 = 0.362; p = 0.782
Weight-specific growth rate (% d−1)0.18 ± 0.130.19 ± 0.080.18 ± 0.080.28 ± 0.18F3,11 = 0.179; p = 0.907
n = 3 replicates, 20 fish per replicate.
Table
Table 3. The effect of aerobic exercise training on several variables related to swimming performance and immune function in juvenile rock carp based on the results of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Table 3. The effect of aerobic exercise training on several variables related to swimming performance and immune function in juvenile rock carp based on the results of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
ParametersCovariate EffectTraining Effect
Critical swimming speed (Ucrit)F1,35 = 13.745, p = 0.001F3,35 = 2.127, p = 0.117
Constant acceleration speed (Ucat)F1,35 = 1.150, p = 0.292F3,35 = 0.445, p = 0.723
Resting metabolic rate (RMR)F1,35 = 0.031, p = 0.860F3,35 = 8.330, p < 0.001
Maximum metabolic rate (MMR)F1,35 = 9.620, p = 0.004F3,35 = 0.479, p = 0.699
Metabolic scope (MS)F1,35 = 10.220, p = 0.003F3,35 = 0.245, p = 0.864
Survival under predationF1,15 = 1.697, p = 0.219F3,15 = 8.407, p = 0.003
LZMF1,23 = 0.303, p = 0.588F3,23 = 4.629, p = 0.014
IgMF1,23 = 1.067, p = 0.315F3,23 = 9.547, p < 0.001
Spleen indexF1,23 = 8.151, p = 0.010F3,23 = 1.945, p = 0.157
Table
Table 4. The effect of aerobic exercise training on the metabolic rate of juvenile rock carp under different water velocities (mean ± S.E.).
Table 4. The effect of aerobic exercise training on the metabolic rate of juvenile rock carp under different water velocities (mean ± S.E.).
ParametersTrainingResults of Two-Way ANOVA
Control
Group		1 bl s−1
Training Group		2 bl s−1
Training Group		4 bl s−1
Training Group		Velocity
Effect		Training
Effect		Interaction
Effect
Metabolic rate (mg O2 kg−1 h−1)6 cm s−1239.15 ± 4.57 Ca203.78 ± 8.51 Dab180.95 ± 14.22 Gb236.93 ± 15.71 DaF7,265 = 83.262; p < 0.001F3,265 = 4.490; p = 0.004F21,265 = 1.287; p = 0.185
12 cm s−1267.27 ± 13.14 Cb215.08 ± 10.57 Da206.20 ± 10.32 Ga228.25 ± 10.85 Da
18 cm s−1303.11 ± 22.49 Ca262.61 ± 13.70 CDa283.02 ± 10.54 Fa264.20 ± 16.61 CDa
24 cm s−1439.12 ± 24.84 Bb355.75 ± 27.61 Ca340.54 ± 18.81 Ea317.48 ± 29.67 CDa
30 cm s−1592.48 ± 47.96 Ac503.90 ± 44.1 Bbc414.52 ± 26.42 Dab377.45 ± 50.72 Ca
36 cm s−1640.93 ± 65.21 Aa609.56 ± 76.59 Ba534.31 ± 33.81 Ca525.07 ± 78.09 Ba
42 cm s−1679.92 ± 71.63 Aa743.45 ± 58.74 Aa659.74 ± 39.38 Ba577.67 ± 78.71 Ba
48 cm s−1708.89 ± 75.65 Aa895.67 ± 72.71 Aa751.12 ± 39.69 Aa856.23 ± 28.69 Aa
Values in each row without a common lowercase letter indicate a significant difference. Values in each column without a common capital letter indicate a significant difference.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hou, Q.; Fu, S.; Huang, T.; Li, X.; Shi, X. Effects of Aerobic Exercise Training on the Growth, Swimming Performance, Antipredation Ability and Immune Parameters of Juvenile Rock Carp (Procypris rabaudi). Animals 2022, 12, 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030257

AMA Style

Hou Q, Fu S, Huang T, Li X, Shi X. Effects of Aerobic Exercise Training on the Growth, Swimming Performance, Antipredation Ability and Immune Parameters of Juvenile Rock Carp (Procypris rabaudi). Animals. 2022; 12(3):257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hou, Qimiao, Shijian Fu, Tiji Huang, Xiuming Li, and Xiaotao Shi. 2022. "Effects of Aerobic Exercise Training on the Growth, Swimming Performance, Antipredation Ability and Immune Parameters of Juvenile Rock Carp (Procypris rabaudi)" Animals 12, no. 3: 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030257

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop