Next Article in Journal
Grazing Ecology of Sheep and Its Impact on Vegetation and Animal Health in Pastures Dominated by Common Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.)—Part 1: Vegetation
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Modulation, Gut, and Omics Crosstalk in Ruminants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Seroprevalence of Tick-Borne Infections in Horses from Northern Italy

by
Luca Villa
1,
Alessia Libera Gazzonis
1,
Carolina Allievi
1,
Claudia De Maria
2,
Maria Flaminia Persichetti
2,
Giulia Caracappa
2,
Sergio Aurelio Zanzani
1,* and
Maria Teresa Manfredi
1
1
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Via Dell’ Università 6, 26900 Lodi, Italy
2
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Sicilia “A. Mirri”, Via Gino Marinuzzi 3, 90100 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(8), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080999
Submission received: 21 March 2022 / Revised: 8 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 12 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Clinical Studies)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Equine vector-borne diseases, which include equine granulocytic anaplasmosis (EGA) and equine piroplasmosis (EP), are caused by several pathogens transmitted to horses by ticks. Considering the spread of equine vector-borne diseases in Italy and worldwide, a study was planned to investigate the seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and the other two selected pathogens, Theileria equi and Babesia caballi, in northern Italy. Data obtained from the present study demonstrated a high seroprevalence for all the three surveyed tick-borne pathogens and emphasized the importance of establishing control programs with the adoption of certain practices, including tick control, correct horses management, serological screening, regular usage of long-lasting acaricides and proper treatment of positive and clinically infected animals.

Abstract

Tick-borne diseases in horses are considered an emergent problem worldwide; the geographical redistribution of ticks, due to climatic and ecological changes, and the movements of infected horses between different nations play important roles in the spread of tick-borne diseases affecting these hosts. In this study, a survey was planned to estimate the seroprevalence of the Gram-negative bacterium Anaplasma phagocytophilum and the piroplasmid protozoa Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in Italian horses, as well as to evaluate possible risk factors associated with seropositive cases. Serum samples from 261 horses reared in northern Italy were collected and analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence antibody test for the detection of A. phagocytophilum-, B. caballi- and T. equi-specific antibodies. The overall seroprevalence to at least one of the investigated pathogens was 51%; sixty-one horses were seropositive to A. phagocytophilum (23.4%), forty-nine to B. caballi and the same number to T. equi (18.8% each). Seropositivity for more than one of the investigated agents was detected in thirty-two horses and the most common co-infection was observed between B. caballi and T. equi (5.7%). A significant risk factor for all the three pathogens was the elevation above sea level; indeed, the risk of infection was higher with an increase and decrease in elevation for A. phagocytophilum and for B. caballi and T. equi, respectively. Tick control in horses is strongly recommended considering the high seroprevalence values of transmitted pathogens.

1. Introduction

Equine vector-borne diseases are caused by several pathogens transmitted to horses by arthropods, particularly ticks. These ubiquitous parasites can live in a variety of environments, where climatic conditions allow their survival and development. Due to global warming and ecological changes, which have increased wildlife populations, ticks are expanding in non-endemic countries. In addition, the high plasticity of ticks allowed their adaptation to a wide host range and the lengthening of the seasonal transmission of tick-borne pathogens (TBPs).
Among these, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and the piroplasmid protozoa are important agents of tick-borne diseases in horses worldwide [1,2]. A. phagocytophilum, a Gram-negative intracellular obligate bacterium, infects granulocytic cells, mainly neutrophils and eosinophils; its principal vector in Europe, including Italy, is Ixodes ricinus [3]. A wide range of both domestic and wild mammals can develop granulocytic anaplasmosis, caused by members of the A. phagocytophilum complex, which includes the agents of tick-borne fever in ruminants (TBF), equine granulocytic anaplasmosis (EGA) and canine granulocytic anaplasmosis (CGA) and of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA). In horses, EGA is characterized by aspecific clinical signs, including lethargy, depression, fever, limb edema, hemorrhagic petechiae, ataxia and thrombocytopenia [1,4].
Babesia caballi and Theileria equi are the etiological agents of equine piroplasmosis (EP) and parasitize erythrocytes. In Europe, they are mainly transmitted by five genera of hard ticks: Dermacentor, Hemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes and Rhipicephalus; the main tick species now recognized as competent vectors are D. marginatus, D. reticulatus, I. ricinus, R. bursa and R. sanguineus [5,6,7]. B. caballi is transmitted in ticks via both transstadial and transovarial ways, while in contrast T. equi is transmitted only trans-stadially [6]. These two hemoprotozoa are endemic in tropical and temperate areas, such as in several southern European countries, including Italy, and cause important economic losses due to treatment costs, abortions and loss of activity, and in some cases also death [8,9]. Clinical signs of EP are comparable to those of EGA: fever, ventral edema, icteric sclera, pale mucous membranes, anemia, hemoglobinuria, bilirubinuria, weakness and lethargy. EP can occur in acute, sub-acute or chronic forms, and after the acute phase horses may remain seropositive, becoming silent carriers of the protozoa [1,8,9]. Seropositivity to these pathogens involves the restriction of the movement of horses among countries; indeed, serological tests for EP are mandatory for international movement, since only seronegative horses for both T. equi and B. caballi can be imported to the United States, Canada, Australia and Japan [10].
EGA and EP can be diagnosed using direct and indirect methods. Intra-erythrocyte piroplasms and Anaplasma spp. morulae can be directly detected via microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained peripheral blood or buffy coat smears. However, when the parasitemia is mild or low, parasite detection is difficult. The molecular determination of TBP DNA is a sensitive and specific diagnostic approach, but it is only useful in early infection. Further, several indirect methods based on antibody detection in sera are available to assess infection during the latent period characterized by microscopically and molecularly undetectable parasitemia, and these tests are also useful for large-scale studies [2,4,11].
In Italy, mainly in the northern areas, information regarding the epidemiology of TBPs in horses is limited, especially for A. phagocytophilum. Indeed, most of the published data are related to serosurveys carried out in central Italy or Sicily [1,12,13,14,15].
Considering the importance of these tick-borne diseases for horses’ health and welfare, as well as the zoonotic aspects of anaplasmosis, a study was planned to investigate the seroprevalence of A. phagocytophilum and the two other selected pathogens, T. equi and B. caballi, in northern Italy, evaluating possible risk factors associated with seropositive cases to contribute to the surveillance of these TBPs and to control their diffusion among horses and humans. Serological studies can include many animals and allow the large-scale assessment of exposure to pathogens, even if to define an animal as infected it is necessary to associate the serology to the direct detection of the parasite using molecular methods. Indeed, PCR assays are very useful in cases of early infection when IgG antibodies have not yet been produced or are not detectable and to detect persistent infections [1,4].

2. Materials and Methods

Considering the population of horses in Lombardy and Piedmont of 78,490 animals (National Zootechnical Database, https://www.vetinfo.sanita.it/; accessed on 1 February 2016), a minimum sample size of 246 horses was estimated, as previously described for an epidemiological survey on protozoa infections in equids [16]. Overall, 261 horses (Equus caballus) from 35 stables located in Lombardy and Piedmont regions at different altitudes (from 60 to 1500 m above sea level (asl)) were included. None of the horses showed clinical symptoms. From April 2016 to March 2017, blood samples were collected through jugular vein puncture, using a Vacutainer® sterile collection system, then refrigerated in tubes without anticoagulants during the transport to the laboratory. Once in the laboratory, sera were separated by centrifugation (2120× g, 15 min) and then stored at −20 °C until serological analyses. Subsequently, samples were analyzed with a commercial indirect immunofluorescence antibody assay (IFAT IgG Kit, Fuller Laboratories, Fullerton, CA, USA) for the detection of antibodies against A. phagocytophilum, T. equi and B. caballi, using a screening dilution rate of 1:80 in a phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH 7.2), as described in the manufacturer’s protocol.
For each sampled horse, data on the following variables were collected to identify possible risk factors: age (in years, ≤30), destination (companion/meat production), gender (male, female), stable elevation (in meters, asl), outdoor housing (yes/no, only box), stable size (small/large, ≥40 animals). Firstly, univariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors that could be predictors of seropositivity for the three selected pathogens. In a second step, the variables showing p-values < 0.1 were entered into a multivariate model developed by backward elimination until all remaining variables were significant (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software (Statistical Package for Social Science, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0., Chicago, IL, USA).
The spatial distribution of the different stables, according to the different elevations, is represented in Figure 1 using the European Digital Elevation Model (EU-DEM, version 1.0).

3. Results and Discussion

In this study, an overall seroprevalence of 51% was estimated, with 133 out of 261 horses seropositive to at least one of the three investigated TBPs (Table 1).
The most common co-infections, i.e., B. caballi and T. equi, both agents of equine piroplasmosis, were observed in 15 out of 261 horses (5.7%). Concerning A. phagocytophilum, the detected seroprevalence of 23.4% was in line with another study recently carried out in central Italy reporting a seroprevalence of 22.75% [14], but higher than previous studies conducted in Italy with values ranging between 7.7% and 17.03% [1,4,13]. Some European countries have shown lower seropositivity varying from 6.5% to 13 % [2,17,18,19,20]. On the contrary, prevalence values comparable to those found in the present study were observed in southern Bulgaria and Denmark [21,22], whereas a higher seroprevalence (73%) was only reported in the Czech Republic [23].
The seroprevalence rates for both B. caballi and T. equi equaled 18.8%. In Italy, regarding B. caballi, previous studies reported values of 8.9% and 26% in horses from south and central Italy, respectively [1,9]. In other European countries, seroprevalence rates varied from endemic territories, such as Spain (21%) [24], France (12.9%) [25] and Portugal (11.1%) [2], to areas where values were lower, such as Greece (2.2%) [10] and Czech Republic (0.4%) [6]. Regarding T. equi, in northern Italy, a lower seroprevalence value of 13.3% was previously recorded [5], while the seropositivity rates rose to 39.8% and 41% in studies conducted in southern and central Italy, respectively [1,9]. In Europe, seroprevalence values varied from high positivity in France (58%) [25] and Spain (44%) [24], both considered endemic territories, to low values in Portugal (17.9%) [2], Greece (11%) [10] and Czech Republic (1.1%) [6]. Regarding B. caballi, the high variability in the seroprevalence could be related to the different distribution rates of ticks and infected animals, and also to the different diagnostic methods [1,10,24].
According to the univariate model (Table 2), the variables significantly associated with A. phagocytophilum seroprevalence were age, destination, elevation, and stable size. Indeed, the risk of infection decreased as age increased (OR = 0.936; 95% CI: 0.893–0.981), as previously observed by Laamari et al. (2020) [26].
However, increased seroprevalence as the age increased was reported in other studies, which was linked to a moderate increase in antibodies as the animals got older [21,23]. In relation to the geographical distribution of infected horses, an increase in the risk of infection was observed as the altitude increased; therefore, the odds for a horse being infected were 1.003 times higher for every one-meter increase in elevation. This relation could be linked to the large populations of I. ricinus, the main vector of A. phagocytophilum, in the surveyed geographical areas, where winters are temperate and summers are hot, with abundant rainfall throughout the year and relative humidity levels above 80%. Additionally, the whole territory is characterized by deciduous woodlands in which the high degree of humidity and the presence of reservoir hosts represent suitable conditions for the development of all life stages of the tick. Although I. ricinus was also described in lowland areas [27], the greater risk of exposition to A. phagocytophilum at higher altitudes was in line with studies that demonstrated the greater diffusion of the vector in hilly and mid-mountain areas [3]; these results could also be inferred from the human cases of Lyme disease that regularly occur in northern Italy [28].
Elevation was also associated with B. caballi and T. equi seroprevalence; indeed, the highest seroprevalence was found in the horses resident in stables located at a lower altitude, with the risk of infection increasing as the elevation decreased (OR = 0.998, 95% CI: 0.996–0.999 and OR = 0.997, 95% CI: 0.995–0.999 for B. caballi and T. equi, respectively). The weather and environment of the counties at lower elevation included in this study, characterized by the presence of wetlands, rice paddies and water meadows, provide an ideal habitat for the life cycle of the vectors of B. caballi and T. equi [29,30]. Other significant variables were the destination and stable size. Moreover, for B. caballi, age was not associated with infection risk as a result of the fact that infected horses eliminate the parasite in the blood within 4 years, with a progressive decrease in antibody titer, whereas horses infected by T. equi may remain as lifelong carriers [8,10,24]. Indeed, the univariate model confirmed that older animals had the highest risk of infection (OR = 1.053, 95% CI: 1.005–1.103) for T. equi. This could also be suggestive of an increase in antibodies with age, since older animals could have been exposed to ticks for a longer period than young animals [2,9,10,24,25].
In the final multivariable model (Table 3), obtained through backward elimination, the only significant variable for all three selected pathogens was elevation; indeed, the risk of infection increased as the elevation increased for A. phagocytophilum, while it decreased for B. caballi and T. equi. This result, as mentioned above in the univariate model, could reflect the geographical distribution and variety of ecological interactions of the ticks responsible for the transmission of these selected pathogens.

4. Conclusions

Horses living in northern Italy are to tick infestations and then to tick-borne diseases; indeed, data obtained from the present study demonstrated a high seroprevalence for all three surveyed TBPs. In particular, it was confirmed that horses are involved in the cycle of A. phagocytophilum, but further molecular analyses are required in order to identify areas where these three pathogens are actively circulating and to confirm the serological results. Surveillance is important both for A. phagocytophilum, due to its zoonotic impact, and for B. caballi and T. equi, for which the serological screening is mandatory for international movements. From the results obtained in this survey, control programs should be developed, with the adoption of practices including tick control, correct horse management, serological screening, regular usage of long-lasting acaricides and proper treatment of positive or clinically infected animals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.G., M.T.M.; methodology, A.L.G., L.V., C.D.M., M.F.P., G.C.; formal analysis, S.A.Z.; investigation, A.L.G.; resources, M.T.M.; data curation, A.L.G., L.V., S.A.Z., C.A.; writing—original draft preparation, C.A., L.V.; writing—review and editing C.A., M.T.M.; funding acquisition, M.T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures for collection of biological specimens from live animals were accomplished following good clinical practices with respect to animal welfare according to current legislation. The study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Università degli Studi di Milano (Permission OPBA_34_2017). In addition, we obtained the owner’s consent for all horses involved in this study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Laus, F.; Veronesi, F.; Passamonti, F.; Paggi, E.; Cerquetella, M.; Hyatt, D.; Tesei, B.; Fioretti, D.P. Prevalence of Tick-borne pathogens in horses from Italy. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2013, 75, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ribeiro, A.J.; Cardoso, L.; Maia, J.M.; Coutinho, T.; Cotovio, M. Prevalence of Theileria equi, Babesia caballi, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses from the north of Portugal. Parasitol. Res. 2013, 112, 2611–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Otranto, D.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Giannelli, A.; Latrofa, M.S.; Cascio, A.; Cazzin, S.; Ravagnan, S.; Montarsi, F.; Zanzani, S.A.; Manfredi, M.T.; et al. Ticks infesting humans in Italy and associated pathogens. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Passamonti, F.; Veronesi, F.; Cappelli, K.; Capomaccio, S.; Coppola, G.; Marenzoni, M.L.; Piergili Fioretti, D.; Verini Supplizi, A.; Coletti, M. Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses and ticks: A preliminary survey of Central Italy. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010, 33, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zanet, S.; Bassano, M.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Taricco, I.; Ferroglio, E. Horses infected by Piroplasms different from Babesia caballi and Theileria equi: Species identification and risk factors analysis in Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 236, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bělková, T.; Bártová, E.; Řičařová, D.; Jahn, P.; Jandová, V.; Modrý, D.; Hrazdilová, K.; Sedlák, K. Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in horses in the Czech Republic. Acta Trop. 2021, 21, 105993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nadal, C.; Bonnet, S.I.; Marsot, M. Eco-epidemiology of equine piroplasmosis and its associated tick vectors in Europe: A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of prevalence. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2021, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. García-Bocanegra, I.; Arenas-Montes, A.; Hernández, E.; Adaszek, Ł.; Carbonero, A.; Almería, S.; Jaén-Téllez, J.A.; Gutierrez-Palomino, P.; Arenas, A. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infection in equids. Vet. J. 2013, 195, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bartolomé Del Pino, L.E.; Nardini, R.; Veneziano, V.; Iacoponi, F.; Cersini, A.; Autorino, G.L.; Buono, F.; Scicluna, M.T. Babesia caballi and Theileria equi infections in horses in Central-Southern Italy: Sero-molecular survey and associated risk factors. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kouam, M.K.; Kantzoura, V.; Gajadhar, A.A.; Theis, J.H.; Papadopoulos, E.; Theodoropoulos, G. Seroprevalence of equine piroplasms and host-related factors associated with infection in Greece. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moretti, A.; Mangili, V.; Salvatori, R.; Maresca, C.; Scoccia, E.; Torina, A.; Moretta, I.; Gabrielli, S.; Tampieri, M.P.; Pietrobelli, M. Prevalence and diagnosis of Babesia and Theileria infections in horses in Italy: A preliminary study. Vet. J. 2010, 184, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Grandi, G.; Molinari, G.; Tittarelli, M.; Sassera, D.; Kramer, L.H. Prevalence of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infection in horses from Northern Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 955–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Giudice, E.; Giannetto, C.; Furco, V.; Alongi, A.; Torina, A. Anaplasma phagocytophilum seroprevalence in equids: A survey in Sicily (Italy). Parasitol. Res. 2012, 111, 951–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ebani, V.V. Serological evidence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and spotted fever group Rickettsia spp. exposure in horses from central Italy. Pathogens 2019, 8, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ebani, V.V.; Nardoni, S.; Bertelloni, F.; Rocchigiani, G.; Mancianti, F. Tick-Borne Infections in Horses from Tuscany, Italy. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015, 35, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Villa, L.; Gazzonis, A.L.; Álvarez-García, G.; Diezma-Díaz, C.; Zanzani, S.A.; Manfredi, M.T. First detection of anti-Besnoitia spp. specific antibodies in horses and donkeys in Italy. Parasitol. Int. 2018, 67, 640–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Leblond, A.; Pradier, S.; Pitel, P.H.; Fortier, G.; Boireau, P.; Chadoeuf, J.; Sabatier, P. An epidemiological survey of equine anaplasmosis (Anaplasma phagocytophilum) in southern France. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2005, 24, 899–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amusategui, I.; Sainz, A.; Tesouro, M.A. Serological evaluation of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in livestock in northwestern Spain. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1078, 487–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tsachev, I.; Baymakova, M.; Pantchev, N. Seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia Burgdorferi infections in horses: First report from Northern Bulgaria. Acta Vet. Hung. 2019, 67, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bogdan, A.M.; Ionita, M.; Mitrea, I.L. Serological evidence of natural exposure to Tick-Borne pathogens in horses, Romania. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hansen, M.G.B.; Christoffersen, M.; Thuesen, L.R.; Petersen, M.R.; Bojesen, A.M. Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Danish horses. Acta Vet. Scand. 2010, 52, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Tsachev, I.; Pantchev, N.; Marutsov, P.; Petrov, V.; Gundasheva, D.; Baymakova, M. Serological evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia spp. infections in horses from Southeastern Bulgaria. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018, 18, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Praskova, I.; Bezdekova, B.; Zeman, P.; Jahn, P. Seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses in the Czech Republic. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2011, 2, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Montes Cortés, M.G.; Fernández-García, J.L.; Martínez-Estéllez, M.A.H. Seroprevalence of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi in horses in Spain. Parasite 2017, 24, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Guidi, E.; Pradier, S.; Lebert, I.; Leblond, A. Piroplasmosis in an endemic area: Analysis of the risk factors and their implications in the control of Theileriosis and Babesiosis in horses. Parasitol. Res. 2015, 114, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Laamari, A.; Azzag, N.; Tennah, S.; Derdour, S.Y.; China, B.; Bouabdallah, R.; Ghalmi, F. Seroprevalence of antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi in horses (Equus caballus) from northern Algeria. J. Vet. Res. 2020, 64, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Scali, S.; Manfredi, M.T.; Guidali, F. Lacerta bilineata (Reptilia, Lacertidae) as a host of Ixodes ricinus (Acari, Ixodidae) in a protected area of northern Italy. Parassitologia 2001, 43, 165–168. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zanzani, S.A.; Rimoldi, S.G.; Manfredi, M.T.; Grande, R.; Gazzonis, A.L.; Merli, S.; Olivieri, E.; Giacomet, V.; Antinori, S.; Cislaghi, G.; et al. Lyme borreliosis incidence in Lombardy, Italy (2000–2015): Spatiotemporal analysis and environmental risk factors. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2019, 10, 101257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Olivieri, E.; Zanzani, S.A.; Latrofa, M.S.; Lia, R.P.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Otranto, D.; Manfredi, M.T. The southernmost foci of Dermacentor reticulatus in Italy and associated Babesia canis infection in dogs. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Genchi, C.; Manfredi, M.T. Tick species infesting ruminants in Italy: Ecological and bio-climatic factors affecting the different regional distribution. Parassitologia 1999, 1, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Study area elevation map (European Digital Elevation Model (EU-DEM), version 1.0; https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1-0-and-derived-products/eu-dem-v1.0?tab=metadata#:~:text=http%3A//land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/satellite-derived-products/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1-0-and-derived-products/eu-dem-v1.0/view; accessed on 15 November 2021) and spatial distribution of the tested horse stables (red dots). White lines: Italian regional boundaries.
Figure 1. Study area elevation map (European Digital Elevation Model (EU-DEM), version 1.0; https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1-0-and-derived-products/eu-dem-v1.0?tab=metadata#:~:text=http%3A//land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/satellite-derived-products/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1-0-and-derived-products/eu-dem-v1.0/view; accessed on 15 November 2021) and spatial distribution of the tested horse stables (red dots). White lines: Italian regional boundaries.
Animals 12 00999 g001
Table 1. Seropositivity to Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Theileria equi and Babesia caballi and their co-infections with IFAT in 261 horses in northern Italy.
Table 1. Seropositivity to Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Theileria equi and Babesia caballi and their co-infections with IFAT in 261 horses in northern Italy.
A. phagocytophilumB. caballiT. equiA. phagocytophilum + B. caballi + T. equiA. phagocytophilum + B. caballiA. phagocytophilum
+ T. equi
B. caballi
+ T. equi
Overall
Seroprevalence
Positive61494936815133
Negative200212212258255253246128
p%
(95% CI *)
23.4%
(18.4–29)
18.8%
(14.2–24)
18.8%
(14.2–24)
1.1%
(0.2–3.3)
2.3%
(0.8–4.9)
3.1%
(1.3–5.9)
5.7%
(3.2–9.3)
51%
(44.7–57.1)
Note: * 95% CI: Confidence interval.
Table 2. Potential risk factors associated with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia caballi and Theileria equi seropositivity in horses reared in northern Italy as assessed via univariate analysis. Test performed at 95% significance level. Note: p-values ≤ 0.1 considered significant.
Table 2. Potential risk factors associated with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia caballi and Theileria equi seropositivity in horses reared in northern Italy as assessed via univariate analysis. Test performed at 95% significance level. Note: p-values ≤ 0.1 considered significant.
PathogenVariableCategoryOR *95% CI **p-Value
Anaplasma phagocytophilumGenderMale0.7080.398–1.2590.240
Female1
Age (years)Continuous0.9360.893–0.9810.006
variable
DestinationMeat production9.0094.686–17.321<0.001
Companion (a)1
Outdoor housingNo (only box)0.5320.226–1.2670.155
Yes (a)1
Stable sizeLarge (≥40)4.0652.130–7.760<0.001
Small (a)1
Elevation (m asl)Continuous1.0031.002–1.004<0.001
variable
Babesia caballiGenderMale1.5490.821–2.9230.176
Female1
Age (years)Continuous1.0290.982–1.0780.236
variable
DestinationMeat production0.1730.052–0.5790.004
Companion (a)1
Outdoor housingNo (only box)0.7930.309–1.7690.497
Yes (a)1
Stable sizeLarge (≥40)0.4010.208–0.7730.006
Small (a)1
Elevation (m asl)Continuous0.9980.996–0.9990.003
variable
Theileria equiGenderMale1.5490.821–2.9230.176
Female1
Age (years)Continuous1.0531.005–1.1030.032
variable
DestinationMeat production0.1100.026–0.4690.003
Companion (a)1
Outdoor housingNo (only box)1.2540.574–2.7390.571
Yes (a)1
Stable sizeLarge (≥40)0.7560.405–1.4100.379
Small1
Elevation (m asl)Continuous0.9970.995–0.9990.001
Variable
Statistically significant variables are indicated by bold type; * OR = odds ratio; ** 95% CI: confidence interval; a = baseline.
Table 3. Potential risk factors associated with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia caballi and Theileria equi seropositivity in horses reared in northern Italy by univariate analysis. Test performed at a 95% significance level. Note: p-values ≤ 0.1 considered significant.
Table 3. Potential risk factors associated with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia caballi and Theileria equi seropositivity in horses reared in northern Italy by univariate analysis. Test performed at a 95% significance level. Note: p-values ≤ 0.1 considered significant.
PathogenVariableCategoryOR *95% CI **p-Value
Anaplasma phagocytophilumElevationContinuous1.0031.002–1.004<0.001
(m asl)variable
Babesia caballiElevationContinuous0.9980.996–0.9990.003
(m asl)variable
Theileria equiElevationContinuous0.9970.995–0.9990.001
(m asl)Variable
Statistically significant variables are indicated by bold type. Note * OR = Odds ratio; ** 95% CI: Confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villa, L.; Gazzonis, A.L.; Allievi, C.; De Maria, C.; Persichetti, M.F.; Caracappa, G.; Zanzani, S.A.; Manfredi, M.T. Seroprevalence of Tick-Borne Infections in Horses from Northern Italy. Animals 2022, 12, 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080999

AMA Style

Villa L, Gazzonis AL, Allievi C, De Maria C, Persichetti MF, Caracappa G, Zanzani SA, Manfredi MT. Seroprevalence of Tick-Borne Infections in Horses from Northern Italy. Animals. 2022; 12(8):999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villa, Luca, Alessia Libera Gazzonis, Carolina Allievi, Claudia De Maria, Maria Flaminia Persichetti, Giulia Caracappa, Sergio Aurelio Zanzani, and Maria Teresa Manfredi. 2022. "Seroprevalence of Tick-Borne Infections in Horses from Northern Italy" Animals 12, no. 8: 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12080999

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop