Next Article in Journal
Home Range and Activity Patterns of Free-Ranging Cats: A Case Study from a Chinese University Campus
Previous Article in Journal
Horse Racing as a Model to Study the Relationship between Air Pollutants and Physical Performance
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/ani12091140
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Follicular Size Threshold for Ovulation Reassessed. Insights from Multiple Ovulating Dairy Cows

by
Fernando López-Gatius
1,2,
Mònica Llobera-Balcells
3,
Roger J. Palacín-Chauri
3,
Irina Garcia-Ispierto
2,3,* and
Ronald H. F. Hunter
4,5
1
Transfer in Bovine Reproduction SLu, 22300 Barbastro, Spain
2
Agrotecnio Centre, 25198 Lleida, Spain
3
Department of Animal Science, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
4
Sidney Sussex College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3HU, UK
5
3 Pleasants Steading, Oxnam, Jedburgh TD8 6QZ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(9), 1140; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091140
Submission received: 7 April 2022 / Revised: 25 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Reproduction)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The selection of a single ovarian follicle able to differentiate and ovulate is a phenomenon common to monovular species including humans. The selected follicle acquires the capacity to ovulate when it reaches a diameter of about 10 mm. In cows with a single follicle of ovulatory size, the probability of ovulation significantly increases with follicle diameter. However, two or more follicles of ovulatory size are often present at estrus. In cows with one follicle of ovulatory size and another follicle of 7–9 mm, the small follicle may, under certain circumstances, ovulate producing a pregnancy.

Abstract

In Bos. taurus cattle, follicular deviation to dominance begins when the selected ovulatory follicle reaches a mean diameter of 8.5 mm. The dominant follicle acquires the capacity to ovulate when it reaches a diameter of about 10 mm. In this study, data derived from 148 cows in estrus with one follicle of ovulatory size and another of 7–9 mm, reveal that the small follicle has the capacity to ovulate alone or with the dominant follicle; thus, giving rise to a single or twin pregnancy. This indicates that a follicle of deviation size may ovulate in the presence of a follicle of ovulatory size.

1. Introduction

Cattle breeds are generally considered monovular. There are, nevertheless, circumstances in which there is an increased incidence of double ovulation and thus of twin pregnancy. In dairy cattle, it is widely accepted that twining compromises both the health of cows [1,2,3] and herd economy [4,5,6]. The economic impacts of twin pregnancies are likely to rise as multiple ovulation rates, particularly in older cows, have increased substantially over the past 30 years along with increased milk productivity [7,8,9]. Genetic progress and improvements in nutrition and management practices have led to a continuous increase in milk yield [10,11,12] suggesting that the multiple ovulation rate will continue to rise in parallel with milk production. These are cogent reasons to examine the factors that cause multiple pregnancies, as the mechanisms underlying multiple ovulations remain to be elucidated [12].
During the estrous cycle of cattle, two or three waves of follicular growth take place, of which only the last wave is ovulatory. Each wave leads to the development of a large dominant follicle and smaller subordinate follicles [13,14,15]. Follicular deviation to dominance begins when the largest follicle reaches a mean diameter of 8.5 mm [15]. The deviation mechanism consists of the reduction or cessation of growth of the subordinate follicles while the largest follicle increases in size. The process finishes either with ovulation or atresia of the dominant follicle [13,14,15]. During the ovulatory wave, the dominant follicle acquires the capacity to ovulate when it reaches a diameter of about 10 mm [16]. In cows with a single follicle of ovulatory size, the probability of ovulation significantly increases with follicle diameter [17,18]. However, two or more follicles of ovulatory size are often present at the time of artificial insemination (AI) and multiple corpora lutea (CLs) may be recorded in over 50% of older cows [19].
Multiple ovulations involve the presence of at least two ovulatory follicles in either the same ovary or in both ovaries. Cows with two or more ovulatory follicles at estrus may show different ovulation patterns to those with a single ovulatory follicle. In a recent study examining 316 cows with two follicles of ovulatory size at AI, individual follicle diameter could not be related to the likelihood of ovulation [18]. In the latter study, only the smaller follicle ovulated in 40.5% of cows [18]. This event of ovulation of only the smaller follicles could be related to two processes: first, a second deviation may occur in cows with co-dominant follicles [20]; and second, during a follicular wave there could be a switch in diameter rank between the dominant and largest subordinate follicle just before or at deviation [21]. However, another possibility could be associated with the ovulation of follicles smaller than 10 mm in multiple ovulating cows, this being the minimum diameter, linked to a capacity to ovulate in monovular cows [16]. The observation of unexpected additional CLs seven days after AI in cows with a single follicle of ovulatory size [18,22] reinforces this idea. The objective of the present study was to assess the possibility of double ovulation in cows with a single follicle of ovulatory size (10 mm or more) and a follicle smaller than 10 mm at estrus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cows and Herd Management

The study population was derived from a Holstein dairy herd in northeastern Spain (latitude 41.13 N, longitude −2.4 E) in which repeat breeder cows were synchronized for fixed-time AI (FTAI) 5–11 days after the last confirmed estrus. Cows were considered repeat breeders when they did not become pregnant after 3 AI in the absence of detectable anatomic abnormalities [23,24]. Pedometers were used to confirm estrus (AfiFarm System; Afikim, Israel) in both FTAI and spontaneous estrus animals. Cows ≥ 60 days in milk showing estrus during the previous 3 weeks and with no CL were recorded as anestrous cows and received the same FTAI protocol at the same time as repeat breeders. The remaining cows were inseminated either at spontaneous estrus or following another FTAI protocol. During the study period (October 2020 to July 2021), the mean number of lactating cows and mean annual milk production was 145 and 12,450 kg per cow, respectively. The mean annual culling rate was 31%. Cows were grouped according to parity (primiparous versus pluriparous) and fed complete rations.
The herd was subjected to a weekly reproductive health program on the day of FTAI. The study population was selected among cows ready for service and inseminated in the weekly visit after ultrasound scanning: FTAI repeat breeders, FTAI anestrous cows, and cows inseminated at spontaneous estrus (first, second, or third AI). In this way, most of the cows should have a single ovulatory follicle at AI, both repeat breeders [25] and cows inseminated during early lactation [26]. Cows were included if they were healthy, confirmed by a body condition score of 2.5–3.5 on a scale of 1–5 [27], produced ≥ 30 kg of milk per day, and were free of clinical signs of diseases from insemination days −7 to +28. In all cows, the presence of a follicle of ovulatory size (10 mm or more) in the absence of luteal structures, a uterus that was highly turgid and contractile to the touch, and copious vaginal fluid, were used as reference to confirm estrus by ultrasound and palpation per rectum [28]. Cows were inseminated by two technicians using frozen-thawed semen from 8 bulls. If a cow returned to estrus before pregnancy diagnosis, its status was confirmed by examination per rectum, and the animal was inseminated at this time and recorded as non-pregnant. A cow was included only once in the study.

2.2. Fixed-Time AI Protocol and Ultrasound Exams

Repeat breeders and anestrous cows were synchronized for FTAI using a controlled internal drug-releasing device (CIDR, containing 1.38 g of progesterone (P4); Zoetis Spain SL, Spain). The CIDR was left in place for 5 days, and these animals were also given cloprostenol (500 µg i.m.; PGF Veyx Forte, Ecuphar, Spain) on CIDR removal. Then, 24 and 60 h later, the cows received a second cloprostenol and a GnRH dose (using the GnRH analogue dephereline: 100 µg gonadorelin acetate [6-D-Phe] i.m.; Gonavet Veyx, Ecuphar, Spain), respectively. Cows were inseminated 72 h after CIDR removal [29].
Ovarian follicular structures larger than 6 mm in diameter and the absence or presence of one or more CLs were assessed by ultrasound immediately before AI and 7 days later using a portable B-mode ultrasound scanner equipped with a 5–10 MHz transducer (E.I. Medical IBEX LITE; E.I. Medical Imaging, Loveland, CO, USA). Each ovary was scanned in several planes, moving the transducer along its surface to identify follicular and luteal structures; measurements and the number and location of both were recorded. Ovulation, confirmed by the presence of at least one mature CL, was assessed on Day 7 post-AI. A lack of high pixel intensity associated with a young CL [30,31] was used as reference to confirm the state of CL maturity. Follicular diameter was measured on the widest image of the follicle and calculated as the average of the greater and lower diameter measurements. The dimensions of a CL were recorded as the mean of two measurements approximating the greatest length and width. As the presence of a central cavity is not functionally important [32,33,34], cavity CL were measured just like solid CL. Scanning was also performed along the dorsal/lateral surface of each uterine horn for pregnancy diagnosis on Day 28 post-AI. Twin pregnancies were registered as unilateral (both embryos in the same uterine horn) or bilateral (one embryo in the right horn and its co-twin in the left horn).

2.3. Data Collection and Statistical Analyses

The pregnancy rate was defined as the percentage of cows that became pregnant out of the total number of cows in the corresponding group. The following data were recorded in each animal: parturition and AI dates; status (repeat breeder, anestrus or spontaneous estrus); lactation number (parity, primiparous vs. pluriparous); the number and location of follicles and CL (unilateral vs. bilateral in cows with two structures); days in milk at AI (DIM; <90 days postpartum versus ≥90 days postpartum); milk production at AI (mean production in the three days before AI) (low producers < 45 kg vs. high producers ≥ 45 kg); sire; AI technician; follicular size at AI; ovulation failure (absence of at least a mature CL seven days after AI); CL size seven days after AI; double ovulation (presence of two CLs seven days after AI); pregnancy 28 days post-AI for ovulating cows; and presence of twins in pregnant cows. The threshold for milk production was set as the median value of production recorded in primiparous cows. Three follicular groups were established: cows with a single follicle, cows with two bilateral follicles (one follicle in each ovary), and cows with unilateral follicles (two follicles in the same ovary). AI dates were used to assess the effects of season on subsequent reproductive performance. In our geographical region, there are only two clearly differentiated seasons: warm (May to September) and cool (October to April) [35,36]. Temperatures for the study period were from October 2020 to April 2021: 28 days with minimum temperature < 0 °C and 3 days with maximum temperature >25 °C (15.25 ± 2.3); from May to July 2021: 0 days with minimum temperature < 0 °C and 75 days with maximum temperature > 25 °C (29.8 ± 5.2).
The software package PASW Statistics for Windows Version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data processing. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (S.D.). Overall reproductive performance in the groups was compared using the chi-square test (percentages) or ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (means ± SD). Possible correlation between follicular size and CL size was examined in single-ovulating and bilateral double-ovulating cows.
The effects of the presence of a small follicle on ovulation and pregnancy rates were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Two regression analyses were performed using ovulation and conception after AI as the dependent variables. The factors entered in the models as independent variables were repeat breeding, anestrus, follicular group (three classes: single, and bilateral or unilateral in cows with a small follicle), season of AI (warm), parity (pluriparous), days in milk (>90 days) and milk production at AI (high producers). For the dependent variable conception rate, only ovulating cows were included. Possible interactions between the presence of small follicles and the variables milk production, season, and parity were also examined. Regression analyses were conducted according to the method of Hosmer and Lemeshow [37].
Two further binary regression models were built using the presence of a small follicle as the dependent variable for all cows, and ovulation of the small follicle for cows with this structure. The factors entered in the models were those considered for the dependent variable ovulation described above except follicular group. In the case of the dependent variable ovulation of the small follicle, the site with respect to the follicle of ovulatory size (bilateral vs. unilateral) and diameter difference between follicles were added as factors.

3. Results

Twelve cows with no follicles of ovulatory size (10 mm or more), 164 cows with two or more follicles of ovulatory size, and 139 cows with luteal structures were removed from the study. The final study population was comprised of 434 cows with a single follicle of ovulatory size along with the presence or not of a single follicle between 7 and 9 mm: 246 repeat breeders, 61 anestrous cows, and 127 cows showing spontaneous estrus. Of the 434 cows, 286 (65.9%) had a single follicle, 99 (22.8%) had two bilateral follicles (one follicle in each ovary) and 49 (11.3%) had two unilateral follicles (two follicles in the right or left ovary). All cows were submitted to AI. Mean milk production and days in milk at the time of AI, as well as the number of lactations and AIs, were 50 ± 9 kg, 133 ± 82 days, 3 ± 1.3 lactations, and 4 ± 2.1 AIs, respectively (mean ± SD). The independent variables recorded for each follicular group and their effects on each dependent variable are shown in Table 1.
Follicular diameter was significantly (p < 0.0001) greater for follicles of pre-ovulatory size than small follicles. As high positive correlation (r = 0.86; p < 0.0001) was recorded between follicle diameter and CL size in single-ovulating plus bilateral double-ovulating cows, CL derived from small follicles were identified in cows with two unilateral follicles. Of the total of 148 small follicles, 51 (34.5%) ovulated: 33 in the bilateral and 18 in the unilateral group. Ovulation occurred only in the small follicle in 17 cows: 12 in cows with bilateral and 5 in cows with unilateral follicles. CL size was significantly (p < 0.0001) greater for CLs derived from follicles of ovulatory size than those derived from small follicles. According to chi-square tests, cows with two follicles showed a significantly (p < 0.001) greater proportion of double ovulations (34/142, 16.9%) referred to the total of ovulating cows, and of twin pregnancies (5/44, 11.4%) referred to the total of pregnant cows, compared with cows with one follicle, in which both parameters were 0%.

3.1. Ovulation and Conception Rates

Seventeen cows (3.9%) failed to ovulate. These cows were subjected to a further FTAI protocol at ovulation diagnosis and their data were excluded from the subsequent analyses but maintained for the analyses of ovulation failure rate and presence of a small follicle. Based on binary logistic regression procedures, no factors were noted to affect ovulation. No young CLs were detected in ovulating cows. Of the 417 ovulating cows, 128 (30.7%) became pregnant. Table 2 provides the pregnancy rate, odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval for the total population of ovulating cows. The final model included only repeat breeding. Impacts of follicular group, anestrus, parity, days in milk, season and milk production were not significant, so these factors were not included in the final model. Using non-repeat breeders as the reference, repeat breeding resulted in a pregnancy rate significantly reduced (p < 0.0001) by a factor of 0.4. Nine conceptuses were derived from small follicles: 6 (3 as co-twins) from the bilateral and 3 (2 as co-twins) from the unilateral group. One cow, in the unilateral group, became pregnant from its small follicle (9 mm), underwent ovulation failure of the follicle of ovulatory size (18 mm) and only a CL of 12 mm was observed 7 days post-AI.

3.2. Presence and Ovulation of Small Follicles

Of 434 cows with a follicle of ovulatory size, 148 (34.1%) had a small follicle. Table 3 provides the incidence of the presence of a small follicle, odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval for the total population of cows. The final model included only repeat breeding. The impacts of anestrus, parity, days in milk, season, and milk production were not significant and these factors were not included in the final model. Taking non-repeat breeders as the reference, repeat breeding resulted in an incidence of the presence of a small follicle that was significantly (p = 0.001) reduced by a factor of 0.6. No factors were associated with the ovulation of a small follicle.

4. Discussion

In this study, we examined the effects of the presence of a small follicle (7–9 mm) in lactating dairy cows with a follicle of ovulatory size (10 mm or more) at estrus. To our knowledge, the presence and ovulation of a small follicle and possible associated factors following either natural or synchronized estrus have not been previously analyzed. A total of 34.5% (51/148) of the small follicles ovulated, with an associated pregnancy rate of 17.6% (9/51). Under our working conditions, there was no influence of synchronization, anestrus, repeat breeding, site with respect to the follicle of ovulatory size (bilateral vs. unilateral), and diameter difference between follicles on ovulation of the small follicle. Although we were unable to find a significant correlation between the variables analyzed and the ovulation of such follicles, we did observe a strong link between the presence of a small follicle and repeat-breeder syndrome.
Follicles with 7–9 mm sizes accompanying a dominant follicle of ovulatory size at estrus are often considered as atretic. Follicular selection to dominance depends on a transient increase in plasma concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [38,39,40]. The selected follicle continues development in the setting of a profound drop in FSH level and may escape atresia, which is the fate of all other follicles that lack the capacity to make use of the low FSH concentrations [41,42,43]. As a dominant follicle matures, there is a transfer of dependency from FSH to LH supporting the establishment of dominance [13,14,44].
The selection of a single ovarian follicle for differentiation and ovulation is a phenomenon shared by monovular species including humans [39,45,46]. However, the presence of two or more co-dominant follicles (follicles of ovulatory size) in high producers can exceed 50% at the time of estrus [18]. In these cases, the largest follicle is not necessarily the one most likely to ovulate. Ovulation only of the smaller follicle may occur in over 40% of ovulating cows [18], 10–30% being an accepted figure among cows, mares, and women [46,47]. The rate of switching of dominance to the small follicle seems similar in the present study. Hence, ovulation only of the small follicle is observed in 12% (17/142) of ovulating cows. However, our results also suggest that follicles of deviation diameter (7–9 mm) behave differently to the smaller follicle in cows with two co-dominant follicles of ovulatory size. In prior work, we were able to relate double ovulation along with ovulation of the smaller follicle to the least size difference between the larger and smaller follicle in a study population of 316 cows with only two co-dominant follicles (cows with three or more follicles of ovulatory size were removed) [18]. This pattern could not be demonstrated here as the diameter difference between follicles was not found to influence ovulation of the small follicles. Studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms related to the ovulation of follicles of deviation size.
It is well documented that a positive correlation exists between follicular diameter at estrus and the size of its associated CL [48,49,50,51]. The high positive correlation in cows with bilateral follicles allowed us to identify the ovulation of small follicles in the unilateral group. Irrespective of this, double ovulation was recorded in 23.9% (34/142) of ovulating cows with two follicles, and twin pregnancies in 14.7% (5/34) of cows experiencing double ovulation. This double ovulation rate is within reported ranges of 12–30% [7,8,26,29,52,53]. We can, therefore, view the presence of deviation-size follicles at estrus as an additional factor favoring twin pregnancies. In fact, an increased proportion of small ovulatory follicles (8–10 mm) has been associated with multiple ovulations (from 2 to 6 ovulations) in beef cow breeds selected on the grounds of five generations of multiple pregnancies [49]. Although a high dose of LH was found by some authors to result in 0% ovulation of follicles of near deviation diameter (7–9 mm) in dairy cows [16], we would expect the high presence of small ovulatory follicles besides two or more ovulatory-size follicles at estrus in dairy cattle. In effect, an increased level of follicular recruitment and growth has been described for cows [54] and women [55] delivering twins.
As we might expect, the presence of small follicles was reduced in repeat breeders. Abnormal follicular dynamics is a common reproductive pattern related to repeat-breeder syndrome [56,57,58] and a low double ovulation rate has been associated with this disorder [25,26]. Repeat breeding emerged here as the only factor influencing the conception rate, and 56.7% (246/434) of cows in our study population were classified as repeat breeders.

5. Conclusions

In the presence of a dominant follicle of ovulatory size (10 mm or more) at estrus, follicles measuring between 7 and 9 mm can ovulate alone or along with the dominant follicle, leading to single or twin pregnancies. In dairy cattle, the lower follicular size limit for ovulation needs revising.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and writing—review, I.G.-I.; investigation and writing—original draft preparation, F.L.-G.; data curation, validation, and writing—review, M.L.-B., R.J.P.-C.; validation, writing—review and editing, R.H.F.H.; funding acquisition, I.G.-I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received financial support from the project ‘01.02.01 de Transferència Tecnològica del Programa de desenvolupament rural de Catalunya 2014–2020′ (Number 19005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, as this was an observational study within the routine practices of a commercial dairy herd.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request. These data are not publicly available to preserve the data privacy of the commercial farm.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ana Burton for editorial assistance with the English version.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mee, J.F. Factors affecting the spontaneous twinning rate and the effect of twinning on calving problems in nine Irish dairy herds. Irish Vet. J. 1991, 44, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuttance, E.; Laven, R. Perinatal mortality risk factors in dairy calves. Vet. J. 2019, 253, 105394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. López-Gatius, F. Twins in dairy herds. Is it better to maintain or reduce a pregnancy? Animals 2020, 10, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nielen, M.; Schukken, Y.H.; Scholl, D.T.; Wilbrink, H.J.; Brand, A. Twinning in dairy cattle: A study of risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 1989, 32, 845–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Echternkamp, S.E.; Gregory, K.E. Effects of twinning on gestation length, retained placenta, and dystocia. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cabrera, V.E.; Fricke, P.M. Economics of twin pregnancies in dairy cattle. Animals 2021, 11, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fricke, P.M.; Wiltbank, M.C. Effect of milk production on the incidence of double ovulation in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1999, 52, 1133–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lopez, H.; Caraviello, D.Z.; Satter, L.D.; Fricke, P.M.; Wiltbank, M.C. Relationship between level of milk production and multiple ovulations in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 2783–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Macmillan, K.; Kastelic, J.P.; Colazo, M.G. Update on multiple ovulations in dairy cattle. Animals 2018, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Johanson, J.M.; Berger, P.J.; Kirkpatrick, B.W.; Dentines, M.R. Twinning rates for North American Holstein sires. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 2081–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Masuda, Y.; Baba, T.; Suzuki, M. Genetic analysis of twinning rate and milk yield using a threshold-linear model in Japanese Holsteins. Anim. Sci. J. 2015, 86, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Vries, A. Symposium review: Why revisit dairy cattle productive lifespan? J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 3838–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Savio, J.D.; Keenan, L.; Boland, M.P.; Roche, J.F. Pattern of growth of dominant follicles during the oestrous cycle of heifers. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1988, 83, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sirois, J.; Fortune, J.E. Ovarian follicular dynamics during the estrous cycle in heifers monitored by real-time ultrasonography. Biol. Reprod. 1988, 39, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ginther, O.J. Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle and horses. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60–61, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sartori, R.; Fricke, P.M.; Ferreira, J.C.P.; Ginther, O.J.; Wiltbank, M.C. Follicular deviation and acquisition of ovulatory capacity in bovine follicles. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 65, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Colazo, M.G.; Behrouzi, A.; Ambrose, D.J.; Mapletoft, R.J. Diameter of the ovulatory follicle at timed artificial insemination as a predictor of pregnancy status in lactating dairy cows subjected to GnRH-based protocols. Theriogenology 2015, 84, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. López-Gatius, F.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Serrano-Pérez, B.; Hunter, R.H.F. The presence of two ovulatory follicles at timed artificial insemination influences the ovulatory response to GnRH in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2018, 120, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. The effects of a single or double GnRH dose on pregnancy survival in high producing dairy cows carrying singletons or twins. J. Reprod. Dev. 2018, 64, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ginther, O.J. The theory of follicle selection in cattle. Dom. Anim. Endocrinol. 2016, 57, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ginther, O.J.; Baldrighi, J.M.; Siddiqui, M.A.R.; Araujo, E.R. Complexities of follicle deviation during selection of a dominant follicle in Bos taurus heifers. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 2012–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. López-Gatius, F.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Hunter, R.H.F. Cervix–rectum temperature differential at the time of insemination is correlated with the potential for pregnancy in dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 2021, 67, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gustafsson, H.; Emanuelson, U. Characterisation of the repeat breeding syndrome in Swedish dairy cattle. Acta Vet. Scand. 2002, 43, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yusuf, M.; Nakao, T.; Ranasinghe, R.B.; Gautam, G.; Long, S.T.; Yoshida, C.; Koike, K.; Hayashi, A. Reproductive performance of repeat breeders in dairy herds. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 1220–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pérez-Marín, C.C.; España, F. Oestrus expression and ovarian function in repeat breeder cows, monitored by ultrasonography and progesterone assay. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2007, 42, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. López-Gatius, F.; López-Béjar, M.; Fenech, M.; Hunter, R.H.F. Ovulation failure and double ovulation in dairy cattle: Risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Edmondson, A.J.; Lean, I.J.; Weaver, C.O.; Farver, T.; Webster, G. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. López-Gatius, F. Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review. Theriogenology 2012, 77, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. Effects of five-day progesterone-based fixed-time AI protocols on follicular/luteal dynamics and fertility in dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 2014, 60, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Townson, D.H.; Ginther, O.J. Ultrasonic echogenicity of developing corpora lutea in pony mares. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1989, 20, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, J.; Pierson, R.A.; Adams, G.P. Ultrasound image attributes of the bovine corpus luteum: Structural and functional correlates. J. Reprod. Fert. 1997, 109, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kito, S.; Okuda, K.; Miyazawa, K.; Sato, K. Study on the appearance of the cavity in the corpus luteum of cows by using ultrasonic scanning. Theriogenology 1986, 25, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kastelic, J.P.; Pierson, R.A.; Ginther, O.J. Ultrasonic morphology of corpora lutea and central luteal cavities during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in heifers. Theriogenology 1990, 34, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Perez-Marin, C. Formation of corpora lutea and central luteal cavities and their relationship with plasma progesterone levels and other metabolic parameters in dairy cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. López-Gatius, F. Is fertility declining in dairy cattle? A retrospective study in northeastern Spain. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. García-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F.; Bech-Sabat, G.; Santolaria, P.; Yániz, J.L.; Nogareda, C.; De Rensis, F.; López-Béjar, M. Climate factors affecting conception rate of high producing dairy cows in northeastern Spain. Theriogenology 2007, 67, 1379–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hosmer, D.W.; Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  38. Armstrong, D.G.; Webb, R. Ovarian follicular dominance: The role of intraovarian growth factors and novel proteins. Rev. Reprod. 1997, 2, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mihm, M.; Evans, A.C. Mechanisms for dominant follicle selection in monovulatory species: A comparison of morphological, endocrine and intraovarian events in cows, mares and women. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008, 43 (Suppl. S2), 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ginther, O.J.; Bashir, S.T.; Rakesh, H.B.; Hoffman, M.M. Two-way coupling between FSH and the dominant follicle in heifers. Theriogenology 2013, 80, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ginther, O.J.; Bergfelt, D.R.; Kulick, L.J.; Kot, K. Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle: Role of two-way functional coupling between follicle-stimulating hormone and the follicles. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 920–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Fortune, J.E.; Rivera, G.M.; Evans, A.C.; Turzillo, A.M. Differentiation of dominant versus subordinate follicles in cattle. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 65, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ginther, O.J. An FSH booster surge for resurgence of the preovulatory follicle in heifers. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2018, 65, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stock, A.E.; Fortune, J.E. Ovarian follicular dominance in cattle: Relationship between prolonged growth of the ovulation follicle and endocrine parameters. Endocrinology 1993, 132, 1108–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Son, W.Y.; Das, M.; Shalom-Paz, E.; Holzer, H. Mechanisms of follicle selection and development. Minerva Ginecol. 2011, 63, 89–102. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ginther, O.J. Switching of follicle destiny so that the second largest follicle becomes dominant in monovulatory species. Theriogenology 2021, 171, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ginther, O.J. Spontaneous switching of future dominance to a smaller follicle: Commonality among monovular species. Biol. Reprod. 2018, 99, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vasconcelos, J.L.; Sartori, R.; Oliveira, H.N.; Guenther, J.G.; Wiltbank, M.C. Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate. Theriogenology 2001, 56, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Echternkamp, S.E.; Cushman, R.A.; Allan, M.F. Size of ovulatory follicles in cattle expressing multiple ovulations naturally and its influence on corpus luteum development and fertility. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 3556–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Vernunft, A.; Weitzel, J.M.; Vierguts, T. Corpus luteum development and its morphology after aspiration of a preovulatory follicle is related to size and steroid content of the follicle in dairy cows. Vet. Med. 2013, 58, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. de Tarso, S.G.S.; Gastal, G.D.A.; Bashir, S.T.; Gastal, M.O.; Apgar, G.A.; Gastal, E.L. Follicle vascularity coordinates corpus luteum blood flow and progesterone production. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2017, 29, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bleach, E.C.; Glencross, R.G.; Knight, P.G. Association between ovarian follicle development and pregnancy rates in dairy cows undergoing spontaneous oestrous cycles. Reproduction 2004, 127, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kusaka, H.; Miura, H.; Kikuchi, M.; Sakaguchi, M. Incidence of double ovulation during the early postpartum period in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2017, 91, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Echternkamp, S.E.; Roberts, A.J.; Lunstra, D.D.; Wise, T.; Spicer, L.J. Ovarian follicular development in cattle selected for twin ovulations and births. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Martin, N.G.; Shanley, S.; Butt, K.; Osborne, J.; Obrien, G. Excessive follicular recruitment and growth in mothers of spontaneous dizygotic twins. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 1991, 40, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Graden, A.P.; Olds, D.; Mochnow, C.R.; Mutter, L.R. Causes of fertilization failure in repeat breeding cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1968, 51, 778–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gustafsson, H. Studies on Follicular Dynamics and Hormonal Asynchrony Around Ovulation as a Potential Cause of Repeat Breeding. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 1988, 33, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Båge, R.; Gustafsson, H.; Larsson, B.; Forsberg, M.; Rodríguez-Martínez, H. Repeat breeding in dairy heifers: Follicular dynamics and estrous cycle characteristics in relation to sexual hormone patterns. Theriogenology 2002, 57, 2257–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Independent variables recorded at the time of AI and effects of the three ovulatory follicle states on each dependent variable (n = 434).
Table 1. Independent variables recorded at the time of AI and effects of the three ovulatory follicle states on each dependent variable (n = 434).
Follicular Status (a)One Follicle
(n = 286)		Two Bilateral Follicles
(n = 99)		Two Unilateral Follicles
(n = 49)
Independent variables (b)
Parity (pluriparous)155 (54.2%)53 (53.5%)28 (57.1%)
Milk production (≥45 kg)140 (49%)60 (60.6%)24 (49%)
Days in milk (≥90 days)223 (78%)68 (68.7%)36 (73.5%)
Season (warm period: May–September)91 (31.8%)33 (33.3%)12 (24.5%)
Repeat breeding174 (60.8%)48 (48.5%)24 (49%)
Spontaneous estrus82 (28.7%)28 (28.3%)17 (34.7%)
Diameter (mean ± SD) of follicles of ovulatory size (≥10 mm)19.8 ± 6.119.7 ± 6.2 *19 ± 6 *
Diameter (mean ± SD) of small follicles (7–9 mm) 7.9 ± 0.5 **7.8 ± 0.8 **
Size (mean ± SD) of CL derived from follicles of ovulatory size23.7 ± 7.523.7 ± 7.3 *22 ± 8.2 *
Size (mean ± SD) of CL derived from small follicles 10.8 ± 0.8 **11.6 ± 1.1 **
Dependent variables (c)
Ovulation failure11/286 (3.8%)4/99 (4%)2/49 (4.1%)
Double ovulation (d)0/275 (0%) ***21/95 (22.1%) ****13/47 (27.7%) ****
Conception rate (d)84/275 (30.5%)33/95 (34.7%)11/47 (23.4%)
Twin pregnancy (e)0/84 (0%) ***3/33 (9.1%) ****2/11 (18.2%) ****
(a) One follicle: cows with a single follicle of ovulatory size (10 mm or more); two bilateral follicles: cows with a single follicle of ovulatory size in an ovary and a follicle between 7 and 9 mm in the contralateral ovary; two unilateral follicles: cows with a single follicle of ovulatory size in an ovary and a follicle between 7 and 9 mm in the same ovary. (b) Values with different superscripts within columns denote significant differences detected by ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (*, **: p < 0.0001). (c) Values with different superscripts within rows denote significant differences detected by the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (***, ****: p < 0.001). (d) In ovulating cows. (e) In pregnant cows.
Table
Table 2. Odds ratios of the pregnancy rate variables included in the final logistic regression model (n = 417).
Table 2. Odds ratios of the pregnancy rate variables included in the final logistic regression model (n = 417).
FactorClassn% PregnancyOdds Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp
Repeat breeding (>3 AI)No72/17940.2Reference
Yes56/23823.50.40.26–0.6<0.0001
R2 Nagelkerke = 0.14.
Table
Table 3. Odds ratios for the small follicle presence variables included in the final logistic regression model (n = 434).
Table 3. Odds ratios for the small follicle presence variables included in the final logistic regression model (n = 434).
FactorClassn% PregnancyOdds Ratio95% Confidence Intervalp
Repeat breeding (>3 AI)No76/18840.4Reference
Yes72/24629.30.60.41–0.910.001
R2 Nagelkerke = 0.15.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López-Gatius, F.; Llobera-Balcells, M.; Palacín-Chauri, R.J.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Hunter, R.H.F. Follicular Size Threshold for Ovulation Reassessed. Insights from Multiple Ovulating Dairy Cows. Animals 2022, 12, 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091140

AMA Style

López-Gatius F, Llobera-Balcells M, Palacín-Chauri RJ, Garcia-Ispierto I, Hunter RHF. Follicular Size Threshold for Ovulation Reassessed. Insights from Multiple Ovulating Dairy Cows. Animals. 2022; 12(9):1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091140

Chicago/Turabian Style

López-Gatius, Fernando, Mònica Llobera-Balcells, Roger J. Palacín-Chauri, Irina Garcia-Ispierto, and Ronald H. F. Hunter. 2022. "Follicular Size Threshold for Ovulation Reassessed. Insights from Multiple Ovulating Dairy Cows" Animals 12, no. 9: 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop