Next Article in Journal
Human Health Benefits of Non-Conventional Companion Animals: A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Luteolin Attenuates APEC-Induced Oxidative Stress and Inflammation via Inhibiting the HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB Signal Axis in the Ileum of Chicks
Previous Article in Journal
An (Un)Expected Threat for a Regionally Near-Threatened Species: A Predation Case of a Persian Squirrel on an Insular Ecosystem
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feed Supplemented with Aronia melanocarpa (AM) Relieves the Oxidative Stress Caused by Ovulation in Peak Laying Hens and Increases the Content of Yolk Precursors
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparative Study of the Nutritional Value and Degradation Characteristics of Amaranth Hay in the Rumen of Goats at Different Growth Stages

Animals 2023, 13(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010025
by Shengjun Zhao 1,†, Shilong Zhou 1,†, Yuanqi Zhao 1,†, Jun Yang 1, Liangkang Lv 1,2, Zibin Zheng 1,2, Honghua Lu 3 and Ying Ren 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Animals 2023, 13(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13010025
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments to the Author

 

Major concerns

The manuscript as I believe investigated the the nutritional value and degradation characteristics of amaranth hay in the rumen of goats at different growth stages. It’s a valuable work and worthy to be done. This is a good help for livestock producers to better use the forage material-amaranth hay. While this may be of interest I found the the manuscript presents in not good form.

 

Question 1: The form of the Abstract, it doesn't seem to do a good job of presenting the conclusions of the study briefly.

 

Question 2: In the Introduction, author used too much space to introduce the basic information of Amaranthus hypochondriacus, while lacked of relevant animal nutrition studies on Amaranthus hypochondriacus. Please add the updated references to the Introduction.

 

Question 3: In the Materials and Methods, in the line 148 to 150, the formulas should be presented in a format specific to “ANIMALS”; Then, the detection process requires simplified expression in line 158 to 160; All of the Table should be corrected to the correct format, like the decimal points (in table 1) and font size (p Value).

 

Question 4: The author should add the updated references from the SCIE related to the results of the study.

 

Some general comments

There are too much formal error in the manuscript, the author must revise carefully!

Question 5: This is lack of whitespace in Line 7 to 8, Line 45 to 46. There are many other places where the same error exists, you should You should check the full manuscript.

 

Question 6: there are the wrong format for reference. Many mistakes need to be corrected.

Author Response

请参阅附件

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors:

The manuscript is well written but you need to work on references. The most important concern I have with the manuscript is the originality of the study. It is well recognized that plants' nutritional values go down, and so do degradation characteristics when plants mature.  What was your hypothesis? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop