Next Article in Journal
Vibrational Molecular Spectroscopy as a Tool to Study Molecular Structure Features of Cool-Season Chickpeas Impacted by Varieties and Thermal Processing in Relation to Nutrient Availability in Ruminants
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Divergence and Connectivity among Gene Pools of Polyprion americanus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/ani13020303
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dietary Supplementation with Chlorogenic Acid Enhances Antioxidant Capacity, Which Promotes Growth, Jejunum Barrier Function, and Cecum Microbiota in Broilers under High Stocking Density Stress

by
Yanhao Liu
1,
Yi Zhang
1,2,
Dongying Bai
1,2,
Yuqian Li
1,
Xianglong He
1,
Koichi Ito
3,
Kexin Liu
1,
Haiqiu Tan
1,
Wenrui Zhen
1,2,
Bingkun Zhang
4 and
Yanbo Ma
1,2,5,*
1
Department of Animal Physiology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China
2
Henan International Joint Laboratory of Animal Welfare and Health Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
3
Department of Food and Physiological Models, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Ibaraki 319-0206, Japan
4
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
5
Innovative Research Team of Livestock Intelligent Breeding and Equipment, Longmen Laboratory, Luoyang 471023, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(2), 303; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020303
Submission received: 8 December 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 January 2023 / Published: 15 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Programming to Improve Livestock Production under Normal or Stressed Condition)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

High density (HD) rearing seriously hinders the healthy development of broilers. Chlorogenic acid, a natural antioxidant food and drug source, may relieve the HD oxidative stress. Therefore, the present study was to investigate the effects of CGA supplementation on growth performance, antioxidant index in serum, relative mRNA expression of jejunum, and cecum microflora of broilers expose to HD stress. A total of 476 7-day-old AA+ broilers were divided into normal density (ND group, 14 broilers/m2) and high density (HD group, 22 broilers/m2), and CGA supplementation (ND or HD + CGA) group. The results showed that HD stress decreased the serum antioxidant capacity, inhibited the development of intestinal villi and the expression of tight junction genes, and thus affected the intestinal permeability during the rapid growth period from 21 to 35 days. Meanwhile, with the progression of HD oxidative stress, adverse changes occurred in intestinal microorganisms, leading to intestinal inflammation, and finally affected the growth performance on day 42. Additionally, dietary CGA can inhibit the oxidative stress from serum to intestinal tract, improve intestinal integrity, and enhance beneficial flora of HD broilers. Thus, dietary supplementations of an antioxidant such as CGA can effectively prevent oxidative stress in HD broilers.

Abstract

Chlorogenic acids (CGA) are widely used as feed additives for their ability to improve growth performance and intestinal health in poultry. However, whether dietary CGAs could reverse the impaired intestinal condition caused by high stocking density (HD) in broiler chickens is unknown. We determined the effect of dietary CGA on growth, serum antioxidant levels, jejunum barrier function, and the microbial community in the cecum of broilers raised under normal (ND) or HD conditions. HD stress significantly decreased growth and body weight, which was restored by CGA. The HD group showed increased serum malondialdehyde, an oxidative byproduct, and decreased SOD and GSH-Px activity. CGA reduced malondialdehyde and restored antioxidant enzyme activity. HD stress also significantly decreased jejunal villus length and increased crypt depth. Compared with ND, the expression of tight-junction genes was significantly decreased in the HD group, but this decrease was reversed by CGA. HD also significantly upregulated TNF-α. Compared with ND, the cecal microbiota in the HD group showed lower alpha diversity with increases in the harmful bacteria Turicibacter and Shigella. This change was altered in the HD + CGA group, with enrichment of Blautia, Akkermansia, and other beneficial bacteria. These results demonstrated that HD stress decreased serum antioxidant capacity, inhibited the development of jejunal villi, and downregulated expression of tight-junction genes, which increased intestinal permeability during the rapid growth period (21 to 35 days). Dietary CGA enhanced antioxidant capacity, improved intestinal integrity, and enhanced beneficial gut bacteria in chickens raised under HD conditions.

1. Introduction

In the livestock industry, rapidly increasing attention is being paid to the problems of animal health and welfare, especially in poultry production where animals are often exposed to environmental stress factors that are strongly affected by stocking density [1,2,3]. Nevertheless, stocking density is an important management measure for poultry production and well-being [3]. High stocking density (HD) is often used to enhance profitability because it increases chicken production per fixed stocking area [4]. Normally, an extreme stocking density of 39 kg/m2 or 18 birds/m2 is acceptable as long as they are properly reared in windowless rooms [4]. However, to meet the growing demands of production, stocking densities much higher than the above density have been used in the poultry industry [5]. The resulting HD typically causes increased oxidative stress which in turn leads to low growth performance and weak immune function [6].
Previously, HD was related to abnormal broiler behavior in addition to problems such as dermatitis, poor feathering and soiling, and more importantly, increased oxidative damage [3,7]. Moreover, oxidative stress from HD could induce a harmful physiological states and oxidative damage from overproduction of free radicals, lowering of antioxidant defenses, and inflammation [8]. This condition can overwhelm the host’s defensive capacity and raises the level of oxidative stress products such as malondialdehyde in serum [7], which can lead to oxidative injury of jejunal tissues [9]. Specifically, HD stress can degrade the integrity of the intestinal barrier by affecting expression of the claudin-1(CLDN1), occluding(OCLN), and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) genes [10], which were regularly accompanied by increased pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [11]. Other researchers have also reported alterations in the intestinal microbial population of broilers in response to HD [12]. HD stressors significantly altered the alpha and beta diversity of the intestinal microbial community of broiler chickens [13]. However, whether damage to physiological and immune states induced by HD stress was associated with growth remained to be confirmed.
Alternatives to antibiotics have been used to enhance growth and antioxidant capacity under high stocking density in broilers [13], including traditional Chinese herbal formulations, probiotics, and antibacterial peptides [13,14,15]. Chlorogenic acid (CGA), an important bioactive dietary polyphenol, is esterified by quinic and caffeic acids, which are produced by green coffee bean extracts [16]. Several studies have reported that CGA has significant pharmacological properties as well as strong antioxidant activity [17]. CGA also had anti-inflammatory effects, including decreased IL-1β, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and TNF-α, and increased interleukin-10 (IL-10) [17]. Recent data have shown that CGA increases intestinal barrier integrity and immune function by modifying the gut microbial composition of broiler chickens [16,17]. In addition, under the current situation of banning antibiotics in feed and restricting livestock and poultry breeding to reduce drug resistance, natural plants with drug homology have become the future development direction for animal husbandry [18]. CGA is considered a potential feed additive to promote animal health and prevent antibiotic abuse [19]. Hence, this study aimed to explore whether dietary supplementation with CGA could improve growth performance, antioxidant metabolism, and related gene expression, and the microbiome of the jejunum and cecum in broilers exposed to HD stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Treatment

This project design received approval from the Care and Use of Experimental Animals Committee of the Henan University of Science and Technology (AW20602202-1-2) in 2019. Experiments were performed following defined guidelines of the Henan University of Science and Technology for animal care.

2.2. Animals and Experimental Design

A group of 476 healthy day-old male Arbor Acres broiler breeders were purchased from a commercial hatchery (Henan Quanda Poultry Breeding Co., Ltd., Hebi, China), and experiments were performed at the Animal Research Unit of Henan University of Science and Technology. During the initial week of the experiments, all animals were kept at 33 °C ± 1 °C. The temperature was then decreased by 1–2 °C every week, until it reached 25 °C ± 2 °C by day 42. The relative humidity was kept at 60–70%, the lights were on for 23 h every day, and off for one hour from 7 to 8 p.m. at night. On day 7, the chickens were weighed and randomly divided into four treatment groups: normal stocking density of 14 birds per m2 (ND), high stocking density of 22 birds per m2 (HD), and dietary supplementation with CGA at 1.5 g/kg in the ND and HD groups (ND + CGA and HD + CGA). CGA (purity 98%) was purchased from Changsha Staherb natural ingredients Co., Ltd. (Changsha, China) and directly added this concentration to the base diet. Each of the treatments consisted of five replicates and three preparations. The initial assessment of a focus trial showed that a 0.15% CGA dosage yielded a better outcome on HD stress of broilers than 0.1% and 0.2% CGA. Thus, it was determined that the CGA concentration should be 0.15%. A diet of corn and soybean meal was fed to the animals following NRC guidelines [20] (Table 1) with no additives except an anticoccidial treatment. Birds were maintained at constant temperature and humidity with food and water ad libitum. Animals in all of the five treatment groups were given vaccinations for infectious bronchitis virus and Newcastle disease virus on days 1 and 20, and bursal disease virus on day 14, as previously described [21].

2.3. Growth Performance and Sample Collection

At 42 days of age, the body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) of birds in each cage were recorded after 8 h of fasting. Two animals from each treatment group were randomly picked and euthanized by CO2 inhalation for sampling jejunal tissue. Blood was drawn from wing veins and placed into serum separator tubes (SST; BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and then centrifuged at 1409 g for 10 min to obtain serum, which was held at −20 °C for later assay. A 2-cm segment of the middle part of the jejunum was removed, snap frozen in liquid N2, and the cecum digesta were collected and stored at −80 °C. The whole sampling process was completed in 25 min.

2.4. Antioxidant Capacity of the Serum

Serum aliquots (100 µL) were analyzed for malondialdehyde (MDA) and catalase (CAT) content and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (kits A001-3, A007-1-1, A005-1 and A001-3, respectively; Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China.

2.5. Intestinal Morphology

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used to evaluate intestinal histology. The jejunum tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated in a succession of increasing ethanol treatments, cleared with xylene, and paraffin-embedded. The wax blocks were cooled to −10 °C, sectioned, and held at RT. The sections were stained with hematoxylin for 8 min, differentiated with 1% HCl in ethanol for 10 s, and washed with DW for 10–15 min. Sections were then counterstained with eosin for 1 min, washed with DW for 6 min, dehydrated with a graded sequence of ethanol consequences, anhydrous ethanol and xylene, then cover-slipped and dried overnight. The tissue sections were observed under the microscope (200×) and the Servicebio system was used to collect images. The heights of the villi and depths of the crypts of the jejunum were measured with the microscope image analysis software C.V2.0, and ratios of villus height/crypt depth (VH/CD) were determined.

2.6. Quantiative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

RNA extraction and real-time PCR were performed as described in previous study [22]. Briefly, total RNA was isolated was isolated from the jejunal tissues with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the purity and concentration of RNA were measured spectrophotometrically (Nano-drop2000). An A260/A280 ratio of 1.9–2.0 indicated good quality RNA, usable for the next step. cDNA was synthesized by employing a Primer Script™ RT reagent Kit with a gDNA Eraser (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR was executed following the protocol reported by [22]. Fluorescent quantitative PCR was performed with target gene-specific primers designed with NCBI/Primer-BLAST and primer specificity was confirmed [23]. The primers for the jejunal tight-junction genes and immune-specific genes are given in Table 2. The relative gene expression levels were determined using the 2−∆∆CT method, and GAPDH was employed as the reference gene for normalization.

2.7. The Cecal Bacterial Community

Total microbial DNA was extracted from cecal contents (100 mg) using the QIAamp Fast Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and stored at −80 °C. The V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the universal primers, F341 and R806: F: ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA; R: GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT. A Qiagen gel-extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used to extract the PCR amplicons, which were quantitated with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and pooled. Amplicon libraries were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq PE250 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The sequencing was performed by Personal Biotechnology, Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and data were analyzed using the free online platform, Personalbio GenesCloud
(https://www.genescloud.cn, accessed on 17 August 2022). Analysis of MiSeq sequencing data was based on a previous report [22]. Briefly, A sample of cecal material was submitted to Shanghai Personal Bio-technology Co., Ltd. (Shang hai, China) to be analyzed for 16S rRNA. The Illumina platform was used to carry out the processing of the raw sequenc-ing data. Using the DADA2 method, sequences of high quality were clus-tered into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) with a 97% similarity cutoff, involving depriming, quality filtering, denoising, splicing, and dechimera steps. The OTUs were evaluated and labeled based on the Greengenes da-tabase. The extraction and overlapping of OTUs, clustering, α-diversity, and β-diversity were obtained by means of the QIIME2 (2019.4) software with Python scripts. A species-diversity matrix was prepared based on binary Jaccard, Bray–Curtis, and weighted and unweighted UniFrac algorithms. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) was employed to determine the differential abundance of taxa. The UPGMA clustering heatmap of microbial communities was analyzed among the top 20 genera based on the abundance. The sample FASTQ information was submitted to the NCBI (Samples accession number: SRP414903-PRJNA916212).

2.8. Statistical Analyses

Each cage-replicate was defined as an experimental unit for growth-performance assessment. The individual animals in each replicate were used as the experimental units (n = 10) for other analyses. The data were compared by one-factor ANOVA using SPSS20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between groups were evaluated by means of Tukey’s multiple-range test and were considered significant at p < 0.05. The figures were constructed with GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of CGA on Growth Performance of HD Broilers

The effect of CGA on the growth of HD chickens is shown in Figure 1. Relative to the ND group, the BW in the HD group on day 42 was significantly lower (p < 0.05), and dietary supplementation with CGA also significantly increased (p < 0.05) the BW on the same day in the ND + CGA and HD + CGA groups. In addition, the ADG was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the ND + CGA group relative to ND, while the ADG in the HD + CGA group was higher (p < 0.05) than that in the HD group.

3.2. Effect of CGA on Antioxidant Capacity of HD Broilers

The serum antioxidant indices of broilers in each treatment group are shown in Table 3. Relative to ND, the serum content of MDA was higher (p < 0.05) in the HD group on days 28, 35, and 42. Dietary supplementations with CGA significantly decreased (p < 0.05) MDA in the HD + CGA compared to the HD group on the same days. In addition, the serum SOD level in HD group was significantly lower than that in ND group at 28 and 42 days (p < 0.05) and GSH-Px level in HD group was significantly lower than that in ND group at 21 and 28 days (p < 0.05). However, the SOD and GSH-Px level was higher (p < 0.05) in the HD + CGA group than in the HD group on days 28, 35 and 42. Relative to the ND group, the CAT content was higher (p < 0.05) in the HD + CGA group on day 42, relative to the HD group, the CAT content was higher (p < 0.05) in the HD + CGA group on day 42.

3.3. Effect of CGA on Jejunum Morphology in HD Broilers

The height of the villi, the crypt depth, and the VH/CD ratio are shown in Figure 2 and Table 4. Relative to the ND group, the villus height and VH/CD were significant lower (p < 0.01) in the HD group on days 21 and 28, and higher in the HD + CGA group (p < 0.05) than the HD group. The crypt depth in the HD group was greater (p < 0.05) than the ND group on days 21 and 42. On day 28, the crypt depth of ND group was higher than that of ND + CGA group (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the HD and HD + CGA groups on day 35.

3.4. Effect of CGA on Jejunal mRNA Expression of Tight-Junction Genes and Immune Factors in HD Broilers

The relative mRNA expression in the jejunum of each treatment group is shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Expression of the tight-junction genes, OCLN, CLDN-1, CLDN-2, and ZO-1, was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) in the HD group relative to the ND group on days 21 and 28. These mRNAs were significantly upregulated (p < 0.05) by dietary supplementation with CGA. The expression of CLDN-2 and ZO-1 were significantly decreased (p < 0.05) in the HD group compared to ND, and the HD + CGA group showed significant upregulation (p < 0.05) of these genes on days 35 and 42. Compared with ND, the expression of TNF-α was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in HD chickens on days 21 and 28, while the HD + CGA group showed significant downregulation (p < 0.05) of TNF-α expression on days 21 and 28. Additionally, the expression of IL-1β and IL-6 was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the HD group compared with ND on days 28, 35, and 42, and downregulated in the HD + CGA group (p < 0.05) compared to untreated HD chickens. The expression of IL-10 was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in the HD + CGA group relative to the HD group on day 35.

3.5. Effect of CGA on the Composition and Diversity of Cecal Microbial Flora of HD Broilers

A significant clustering of microbes in the cecal microbiota was observed between ND, HD and HD + CGA group (Figure 5). In addition, the Shannon, Simpson, and Chao bacterial richness and alpha-diversity indices of the HD group were lower (p < 0.05) than for the ND group, while the HD + CGA group had significantly increased Shannon and Simpson indices (p < 0.05) (Figure 5A–C). The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) (Figure 5D) revealed that the HD and HD + CGA groups had relatively fragmented distributions with low similarity and large differences in community composition, while the ND group showed a relatively concentrated distribution, differing from that of the other two groups. As shown in the Venn diagram analysis of the OTUs, there were 1147 share not duplicated OTUs among the three groups; 7524, 3359, and 3652 unique OTUs were identified in the ND, HD, and HD + CGA groups, respectively (Figure 5E). Taxonomic unit analysis revealed that the dominant phyla (Figure 5F) of the three groups included Firmicutes (77.98%, 88.92%, 88.92%), Bacteroidetes (19.73%, 7.64%, 10.14%), and Actinobacteria (0.63%, 0.96%, 0.73%). The HD and HD + CGA groups had higher numbers of Firmicutes and lower numbers of Bacteroidetes compared with the ND group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the proportion of Actinobacteria between HD and HD + CGA. At the genus level (Figure 5G), the dominant genera in the ceca of the three groups were Lactobacillus (24.98%, 27.28%, 30.24%), Bacteroides (16.33%, 5.32%, 5.77%), Faecalibacterium (7.46%, 3.87%, 5.52%), Ruminococcus (2.24%, 4.62%, 2.86%), Alistipes (3.13%, 2.21%, 4.33%), Oscillospira (3.82%, 2.71%, 2.81%), and Butyricoccus (2.54%, 2.66%, 1.93%). Compared with ND group, the HD group had fewer (p < 0.05) Faecalibacterium and Alistipes (Figure 5H), but there was no difference among the three groups with regard to the other dominant bacterial genera. The LEfSe results (Figure 5I,J) showed that Actinobacteria, Bifidobacteriales, Bifidobacteriaceae, and Actinomycetales were enriched in the ND group compared to the HD group. Lactobacillaceae, Lactobacillus, Lactobacillales, Weissella, Abiotrophia, and Aerococcaceae were enriched in the HD + CGA group compared to the HD group.
To further compare the differences in species composition among groups and to achieve a demonstration of species abundance distribution trends for each sample, the top 20 genera in terms of relative abundance were clustered at the genus classification level and plotted on a heat map (Figure 5K). Alistipes, Anaerotruncus, and Faecalibacterium were greatly enriched in the ND group, Turicibacter and Shigella were greatly enriched in the HD group, and the relative abundance of Cc-15, Akkermansia, and Blautia was increased in HD + CGA.

4. Discussion

Many previous experiments have reported that chickens raised under high density conditions had lower BWs and ADG than those in normal density [24,25]. Additionally, some studies showed that increasing the stocking density increased stress and led to reductions in BWG during the growing periods [2], which was in agreement with our current study. Esteves [26] claimed that the recommended stocking density could be increased to nearly 18 birds/m2 with no major adverse effects on the final BW. The HD conditions in our study were over the recommended density, demonstrating that HD negatively affected weight gain and feed intake. CGA supplementation increased BW and ADG of HD chickens, suggesting that addition of CGA to the diet could alleviate the anorexia induced by HD housing, similar to the results of the previous study [21], although a dose of 1 g/kg (0.1% CGA) was administered.
In the present study, HD increased MDA levels on days 21 and 42, and decreased the antioxidant enzymes SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT on days 28 and 42, which are the key intracellular defenses to oxidative stress in broilers [27]. These results suggested that HD induced oxidative stress during the fast-growing periods, which was consistent with the growth performance results. Moreover, dietary CGA supplementations decreased MDA levels on days 21 and 42, increased SOD on days 21 and 42, and GSH-Px on days 28 and 35 in the serum of HD chickens. Our results demonstrated that feeding CGA effectively alleviated HD-induced oxidative stress by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity in chickens. These results are similar to those in the study by [28], who found that antioxidant enzymes activities were enhanced with dietary supplementations of CGA in heat-stressed chickens.
Oxidative stress is associated with many intestinal disorders and their pathological processes [29]. Intestinal morphology, villus height, crypt depth, and V/C ratio are key indicators of gut health, which can reflect the intestinal barrier integrity, development status, and the nutrient absorption capacity of the intestine in chickens [30]. In this study, our results showed that HD housing of chickens significantly injured the intestinal morphology in the jejuna, similar to results in previous work [31,32]. In addition, we showed that CGA feeding also increased villus height and V/C value and decreased crypt depth of the ileum in chickens under oxidant stress. The improvement in gut health and antioxidant enzymes in our experiments may account for the improvement in growth. Recent reports revealed that CGA supplementations improved intestinal morphology in chickens with necrotizing enteritis [31]. Meanwhile, Liu [30] found that dietary supplementation with 1 g/kg CGA increased villus height and maintained intestinal integrity of chickens with necrotic enteritis.
Normal intestinal morphology and intact intestinal barrier are essential for normal metabolism and immunocompetence [33,34]. Tight junction genes such as OCLN, CLDN-1, CLDN-2, and ZO-1, constitute a mechanical barrier that is particularly essential for gut health in chickens [35]. Our result suggested that on days 21 and 28, HD resulted in the downregulation of mRNA expression of tight-junction-related genes in the jejunum, which constitutes evidence of impaired intestinal barrier defenses [36]. OCLN and CLDN-1 are transmembrane tight-junction genes, which are involved in preserving tight junctions and the gut barrier [37]. ZO-1 is an essential scaffolding protein connecting transmembrane proteins to intracellular cytoskeletons [37]. In addition, our data suggested that supplementation of HD chickens with CGA significantly increased the expression of tight-junction-related genes in jejuna thereby improving intestinal barrier function. Similar results were found in a study by Liu [30], who reported that dietary CGA upregulated the expression of tight junction proteins in dexamethasone-challenged chickens. In summary, combined with the histomorphology results and tight-junction gene expression, it is suggested that in the early rapid growth stage, HD caused damage to the development of intestinal villi and the intestinal barrier, ultimately reducing production performance of the whole cycle.
Cytokines play a critical role in immune and inflammatory responses [38]. Exposure to HD conditions increased the expression of pro-inflammatory factors in broilers [39,40]; inflammation is one of the main factors in the disruption of intestinal barrier function, and numerous studies have shown that upregulation of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 and downregulation of IL-10 underlie damage to the intestinal barrier [41,42,43]; CGA reduced excessive TNF-α and IL-1β expression and significantly inhibited inflammation [44]. In this study, the expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in jejunal tissue was significantly increased in the HD group compared with ND chickens, while expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 tended to decrease with CGA feeding. Although there were differences in the expression of these genes throughout the dietary supplementation period, they were active during the rapid growth period after 28 days of age. There have been reports of research suggesting that the response to changes in stocking density depended on environmental variables [45]. Especially during rapid growth periods, high stocking densities may result in decreased broiler performance due to high temperatures and low airflow [3]. Dawkins and colleagues [46] proposed that environmental differences in the poultry producers’ methods of rearing chickens may have a greater impact on welfare than stocking density. In the present study, on days 35 and 42, the mRNA expression of IL-10 in the ND + CGA group was significantly increased over that of the treatment HD group, and this effect was reversed at day 28. IL-10 mainly targets the innate and adaptive immune responses and exerts an immunosuppressive function to reduce excessive and uncontrolled inflammatory responses. This over-activity of the immune system can cause tissue damage, especially during the remission phase of infection and inflammation, and has been suggested as a target in inflammatory diseases to restore tissue homeostasis [47]. The results suggest that with the growth of chickens, the HD increases stress, which leads to excessive inflammation, and then induces IL-10 overexpression. Dietary supplementations with CGA could inhibit the occurrence of excessive inflammation.
It is well known that the intestinal microbiota of poultry plays an important role in digestion, barrier maintenance, and immune function, all of which may contribute to enhanced growth performance [48,49]. The intestinal microbial population is a complex community of hundreds of different microorganisms which affects the host and plays a role in regulating the immune system, nutrient digestion, and modulating intestinal function as well as overall health and growth [37,50]. It is clear from this study that HD could disrupt the balance of gut microbes, not only by reducing their diversity, but also by allowing the growth of pathogenic bacteria, which is consistent with previous research [51]. In the present study, dietary supplementation with CGA significantly increased the cecal microbial diversity in HD chickens as evidenced by the Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 indices, likewise, the previous studies revealed that CGA not only significantly changed the intestinal structure, but also increased the α diversity of cecal microbes, decreased the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in cecal digests, and increased the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria [52]. Moreover, in this study, the number of Firmicutes in the ND group was significantly lower than that in the HD group, indicating that the intestinal health of chickens in the HD group was damaged. The same studies showed that at the phylum level, the intestinal microbiota was mainly composed of Firmicutes (35–80%) [53]. Elevated corticosterone levels induced by high density stress may lead to dysregulation of intestinal microbiota, including an increased abundance of Firmicutes and decrease in α diversity [25]. Lefse analysis showed that Actinobacteria and Bifidobacteriales were the dominant types in the ND group compared with the HD group, which has been shown to play a dominant role in the maintenance of intestinal health [54]. Compared with HD group, the HD + CGA group was enriched in Lactobacillaceae, Lactobacillus, Lactobacillales, and Weissella, and these bacteria have likewise been shown to play an important role in the maintenance of organismal health [55,56]. In this study, Faecalibacterium and Alistipes were abundantly enriched in the ND group, but less abundant in the HD group; the HD + CGA group had an increased relative abundance of these genera. Numerous studies demonstrated that Clostridium pratense (Faecalibacterium) and Alistipes play an important role in immune regulation and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis [57,58]. CGA supplementation improved the body’s defense against oxidative stress and inflammatory response damage, while the numbers of Alistipes also increased in the study [44].
Several studies have shown that Ruminococcus was associated with a variety of intestinal diseases [59,60], and Shigella was one of the main pathogens causing intestinal infections [61,62]. These bacteria were significantly enriched in the HD group, and CGA reduced their abundance. These results suggested that CGA could also ameliorate HD stress by enhancing intestinal microbial activity. The cecal microbiome profile suggested that with exposure to HD, CGA may have positive effects such as increasing the abundance of beneficial microorganisms and decreasing the abundance of bacteria associated with dysfunction, thus reducing oxidative damage, maintaining immune regulation, and ultimately protecting the integrity of the intestinal barrier.

5. Conclusions

The present study preliminarily demonstrated that changes in the environment from HD stress during the rapid growth period from days 21 to 35 affected serum antioxidant levels, inhibited the development of intestinal villi, and thus affected intestinal permeability. Meanwhile, along with the progression of oxidative stress from HD, adverse changes occurred in the intestinal microbiota that led to intestinal inflammation, eventually reducing growth performance by day 42. However, dietary CGA supplementation could repress chronic inflammation, improve intestinal integrity, and enhance beneficial gut microbes in broilers challenged with HD stress. Overall, this study reveals a promising strategy for the prevention of chronic intestinal inflammation in high-stocking density-reared broilers by dietary supplementations with immunomodulators such as CGA.

Author Contributions

Investigation, Y.L. (Yanhao Liu); methodology, K.L. and X.H.; software, H.T.; data curation, Y.L. (Yuqian Li) and X.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. (Yanhao Liu) and Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, D.B., W.Z., B.Z. and K.I.; project administration, Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partly supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Number 2022YFE0111100, Grant Number 2017YFE0129900) and Key Scientific Research Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Henan Province (Grant Number 22A230001) and Science Foundation for Expat Scientist Studio for Animal Stress and Health Breeding of Henan Province (Grant Number GZS2021006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Henan University of Science and Technology, and the management and experimental procedures of the experiment animals complied with the regulations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding author can provide access to the collected and analyzed data sets from this study upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Science and Technology for the use of experimental facilities, and greatly acknowledge to the International Joint Lab for Animal Welfare and Health Breeding of Henan Province and Expat Scientist Studio for Animal Stress and Health Breeding of Henan Province for the kindly academic advice of this experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Abbreviations

ADG: average daily gain; ANOVA, analysis of variance; BW, body weight; CAT, catalase; CD, jejunum crypt depth; CGA, chlorogenic acid; CLDN1, claudin-1; CLDN2, claudin-2; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; HD, high stocking density; HD CGA, HD + CGA group; HE, hematoxylin and eosin; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-10, interleukin-10; LEfSe, LDA effect size; MDA, malondialdehyde; ND, normal density; ND CGA, ND + CGA group; NRC, nuclear regulatory commission; OCLN, occludin; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; PCoA, principal coordinates analysis; SOD, superoxide dismutase; SST, serum separator tubes; TM, melting temperature; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; TRIzol, total RNA extraction reagent; VH, jejunum villus height; VH/CD, ratio of jejunum villus height to jejunum crypt depth; ZO-1, zonula occludens-1.

References

  1. Simitzis, P.E.; Kalogeraki, E.; Goliomytis, M.; Charismiadou, M.A.; Triantaphyllopoulos, K.; Ayoutanti, A.; Niforou, K.; Hager-Theodorides, A.L.; Deligeorgis, S.G. Impact of stocking density on broiler growth performance, meat characteristics, behavioural components and indicators of physiological and oxidative stress. Br. Poult. Sci. 2012, 53, 721–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, B.; Min, Z.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, B.; Guo, Y. Effects of dietary tryptophan and stocking density on the performance, meat quality, and metabolic status of broilers. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Son, J.; Kim, H.J.; Hong, E.C.; Kang, H.K. Effects of Stocking Density on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Status, and Meat Quality of Finisher Broiler Chickens under High Temperature. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sugiharto, S. Dietary strategies to alleviate high-stocking-density-induced stress in broiler chickens—A comprehensive review. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2022, 65, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Buijs, S.; Keeling, L.; Rettenbacher, S.; Van Poucke, E.; Tuyttens, F.A. Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 1536–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, W.; Wei, F.; Xu, B.; Sun, Q.; Deng, W.; Ma, H.; Bai, J.; Li, S. Effect of stocking density and alpha-lipoic acid on the growth performance, physiological and oxidative stress and immune response of broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1914–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Nasr, M.; Alkhedaide, A.Q.; Ramadan, A.; Hafez, A.; Hussein, M.A. Potential impact of stocking density on growth, carcass traits, indicators of biochemical and oxidative stress and meat quality of different broiler breeds. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Surai, P.F.; Kochish, I.I.; Fisinin, V.I.; Kidd, M.T. Antioxidant Defence Systems and Oxidative Stress in Poultry Biology: An Update. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Choi, J.H.; Kim, G.B.; Cha, C.J. Spatial heterogeneity and stability of bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tracts of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 1942–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, T.; Yan, L.; Qiu, L.; Yin, H.; Ding, X.; Bai, S.; Zeng, Q.; Mao, X.; et al. Dietary 25-hydroxyvitamin D improves intestinal health and microbiota of laying hens under high stocking density. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, W.; Xia, T.; Yu, X. Wogonin suppresses inflammatory response and maintains intestinal barrier function via TLR4-MyD88-TAK1-mediated NF-κB pathway in vitro. Inflamm. Res. 2015, 64, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guardia, S.; Konsak, B.; Combes, S.; Levenez, F.; Cauquil, L.; Guillot, J.F.; Moreau-Vauzelle, C.; Lessire, M.; Juin, H.; Gabriel, I. Effects of stocking density on the growth performance and digestive microbiota of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 1878–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, H.Y.; Piao, X.S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P.; Yi, J.Q.; Liu, J.D.; Li, Q.Y.; Wang, G.Q. The effects of Forsythia suspensa extract and berberine on growth performance, immunity, antioxidant activities, and intestinal microbiota in broilers under high stocking density. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 1981–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Miao, Z.Q.; Dong, Y.Y.; Qin, X.; Yuan, J.M.; Han, M.M.; Zhang, K.K.; Shi, S.R.; Song, X.Y.; Zhang, J.Z.; Li, J.H. Dietary supplementation of methionine mitigates oxidative stress in broilers under high stocking density. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tajik, N.; Tajik, M.; Mack, I.; Enck, P. The potential effects of chlorogenic acid, the main phenolic components in coffee, on health: A comprehensive review of the literature. Eur. J. Nutr. 2017, 56, 2215–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liang, N.; Kitts, D.D. Role of Chlorogenic Acids in Controlling Oxidative and Inflammatory Stress Conditions. Nutrients 2015, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Vukelić, I.; Detel, D.; Pučar, L.B.; Potočnjak, I.; Buljević, S.; Domitrović, R. Chlorogenic acid ameliorates experimental colitis in mice by suppressing signaling pathways involved in inflammatory response and apoptosis. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 121, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vizzier, T.Y.; Christensen, K.D.; Mench, J.A.; Rumley, E.R.; Daugherty, C.; Feinberg, B.; Parker, M.; Siegel, P.; Scanes, C.G. Symposium: Animal welfare challenges for today and tomorrow. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2198–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, J.; Xiong, Y.L. Natural antioxidants as food and feed additives to promote health benefits and quality of meat products: A review. Meat Sci. 2016, 120, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirement of Poultry, 9th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bai, D.; Liu, K.; He, X.; Tan, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhen, W.; Zhang, C.; Ma, Y. Effect of Dietary Chlorogenic Acid on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Function, and Immune Response of Broiler Breeders under Immune Stress and Stocking Density Stress. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhen, W.R.; Shao, Y.J.; Wu, Y.Y.; Li, L.H.; Pham, V.H.; Abbas, W.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z. Dietary yeast beta-glucan supplementation improves eggshell color and fertile eggs hatchability as well as enhances immune functions in breeder laying hens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhen, W.; Liu, Y.; Shao, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wu, Y.; Guo, F.; Abbas, W.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z. Yeast β-Glucan Altered Intestinal Microbiome and Metabolome in Older Hens. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 766878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Goo, D.; Kim, J.H.; Park, G.H.; Delos, R.J.; Kil, D.Y. Effect of stocking density and dietary tryptophan on growth performance and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 4504–4508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dai, D.; Qi, G.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Qiu, K.; Han, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wu, S. Dietary organic acids ameliorate high stocking density stress-induced intestinal inflammation through the restoration of intestinal microbiota in broilers. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2022, 13, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Estevez, I. Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, L.; Yu, Z.; Hou, J.; Deng, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Cui, J. Toxicity and oxidative stress induced by T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin in broilers and broiler hepatocytes. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 87, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chen, F.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, N.; Yang, X.; Du, E.; Huang, S.; Guo, W.; Zhang, W.; Wei, J. Effect of chlorogenic acid on intestinal inflammation, antioxidant status, and microbial community of young hens challenged with acute heat stress. Anim. Sci. J. 2021, 92, e13619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, B.; Jha, R. Oxidative Stress in the Poultry Gut: Potential Challenges and Interventions. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Zhang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Ci, X.; Chen, S.; Xie, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Chen, F.; Xie, Q. Evaluation of the efficacy of chlorogenic acid in reducing small intestine injury, oxidative stress, and inflammation in chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens type A. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 6606–6618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Goo, D.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, H.S.; Park, G.H.; Han, G.P.; Kil, D.Y. Effect of stocking density and sex on growth performance, meat quality, and intestinal barrier function in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, D.G.; Namgung, N.; Kim, J.H.; Won, S.Y.; Choi, W.J.; Kil, D.Y. Effects of stocking density and dietary vitamin C on performance, meat quality, intestinal permeability, and stress indicators in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Salvo, R.E.; Alonso, C.C.; Pardo, C.C.; Casado, B.M.; Vicario, M. The intestinal barrier function and its involvement in digestive disease. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2015, 107, 686–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Maloy, K.J.; Powrie, F. Intestinal homeostasis and its breakdown in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2011, 474, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, J.; Tellez, G.; Richards, J.D.; Escobar, J. Identification of Potential Biomarkers for Gut Barrier Failure in Broiler Chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2015, 2, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gilani, S.; Howarth, G.S.; Nattrass, G.; Kitessa, S.M.; Barekatain, R.; Forder, R.; Tran, C.D.; Hughes, R.J. Gene expression and morphological changes in the intestinal mucosa associated with increased permeability induced by short-term fasting in chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 102, e653–e661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ulluwishewa, D.; Anderson, R.C.; McNabb, W.C.; Moughan, P.J.; Wells, J.M.; Roy, N.C. Regulation of tight junction permeability by intestinal bacteria and dietary components. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kogut, M.H. Cytokines and prevention of infectious diseases in poultry: A review. Avian Pathol. 2000, 29, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Cengiz, Ö.; Köksal, B.H.; Tatlı, O.; Sevim, Ö.; Ahsan, U.; Üner, A.G.; Ulutaş, P.A.; Beyaz, D.; Büyükyörük, S.; Yakan, A.; et al. Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 2395–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xin, X.; Han, M.; Wu, Y.; Dong, Y.; Miao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Song, X.; Jia, R.; Su, Y.; Liu, C.; et al. Dietary Supplemental Chromium Yeast Improved the Antioxidant Capacity, Immunity and Liver Health in Broilers under High Stocking Density. Animals 2022, 12, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Niu, J.; Jing, C.; Jiao, N.; Huang, L.; Jiang, S.; Yan, L.; Yang, W.; Li, Y. Supplementation with paraformic acid in the diet improved intestinal development through modulating intestinal inflammation and microbiota in broiler chickens. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 975056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Song, Z.; Cheng, K.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T. Dietary supplementation of enzymatically treated Artemisia annua could alleviate the intestinal inflammatory response in heat-stressed broilers. J. Therm. Biol. 2017, 69, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sun, H.; Zhao, L.; Xu, Z.J.; De Marco, M.; Briens, M.; Yan, X.H.; Sun, L.H. Hydroxy-Selenomethionine Improves the Selenium Status and Helps to Maintain Broiler Performances under a High Stocking Density and Heat Stress Conditions through a Better Redox and Immune Response. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wan, F.; Zhong, R.; Wang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yi, B.; Hou, F.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, L.; et al. Caffeic Acid Supplement Alleviates Colonic Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Potentially through Improved Gut Microbiota Community in Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 784211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dozier, W.R.; Thaxton, J.P.; Purswell, J.L.; Olanrewaju, H.A.; Branton, S.L.; Roush, W.B. Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dawkins, M.S.; Donnelly, C.A.; Jones, T.A. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 2004, 427, 342–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ouyang, W.; O’Garra, A. IL-10 Family Cytokines IL-10 and IL-22: From Basic Science to Clinical Translation. Immunity 2019, 50, 871–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yadav, S.; Jha, R. Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilization, performance, and health of poultry. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 10, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhou, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, X.; Lin, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, N.; Wang, S. Chlorogenic acid supplementation ameliorates hyperuricemia, relieves renal inflammation, and modulates intestinal homeostasis. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 5637–5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sekelja, M.; Rud, I.; Knutsen, S.H.; Denstadli, V.; Westereng, B.; Næs, T.; Rudi, K. Abrupt temporal fluctuations in the chicken fecal microbiota are explained by its gastrointestinal origin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 2941–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kridtayopas, C.; Rakangtong, C.; Bunchasak, C.; Loongyai, W. Effect of prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation in diet on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, stress, and bacterial population under high stocking density condition of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 4595–4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, J.; Yu, B.; Chen, D.; Zheng, P.; Luo, Y.; Huang, Z.; Luo, J.; Mao, X.; Yu, J.; He, J. Changes of porcine gut microbiota in response to dietary chlorogenic acid supplementation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 8157–8168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Danzeisen, J.L.; Kim, H.B.; Isaacson, R.E.; Tu, Z.J.; Johnson, T.J. Modulations of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xi, Y.; Li, H.; Yu, M.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Hui, B.; Zeng, X.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Protective effects of chlorogenic acid on trimethyltin chloride-induced neurobehavioral dysfunctions in mice relying on the gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 1535–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Teixeira, C.G.; Fusieger, A.; Milião, G.L.; Martins, E.; Drider, D.; Nero, L.A.; de Carvalho, A.F. Weissella: An Emerging Bacterium with Promising Health Benefits. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 13, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, X.; Shi, L.; Chen, R.; Zhao, Y.; Ren, D.; Yang, X. Chlorogenic acid inhibits trimethylamine-N-oxide formation and remodels intestinal microbiota to alleviate liver dysfunction in high L-carnitine feeding mice. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 10500–10511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, J.; Liang, R.; Zhang, W.; Tian, K.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Yu, T.; Chen, Q. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii-derived microbial anti-inflammatory molecule regulates intestinal integrity in diabetes mellitus mice via modulating tight junction protein expression. J. Diabetes 2020, 12, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Parker, B.J.; Wearsch, P.A.; Veloo, A.; Rodriguez-Palacios, A. The Genus Alistipes: Gut Bacteria with Emerging Implications to Inflammation, Cancer, and Mental Health. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Manor, O.; Dai, C.L.; Kornilov, S.A.; Smith, B.; Price, N.D.; Lovejoy, J.C.; Gibbons, S.M.; Magis, A.T. Health and disease markers correlate with gut microbiome composition across thousands of people. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Henke, M.T.; Brown, E.M.; Cassilly, C.D.; Vlamakis, H.; Xavier, R.J.; Clardy, J. Capsular polysaccharide correlates with immune response to the human gut microbe Ruminococcus gnavus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2007595118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nisa, I.; Qasim, M.; Yasin, N.; Ullah, R.; Ali, A. Shigella flexneri: An emerging pathogen. Folia Microbiol. 2020, 65, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shad, A.A.; Shad, W.A. Shigella sonnei: Virulence and antibiotic resistance. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 13 00303 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of CGA on growth performance of broilers under HD stress. ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA. (A) Body weight at day 42. (B) Average daily gain at days 21 and 42. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 10). Values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Figure 1. Effects of CGA on growth performance of broilers under HD stress. ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA. (A) Body weight at day 42. (B) Average daily gain at days 21 and 42. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 10). Values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Animals 13 00303 g001
Animals 13 00303 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of CGA on jejunal morphology of broilers under HD stress. ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA. Scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 2. Effects of CGA on jejunal morphology of broilers under HD stress. ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA. Scale bar = 100 µm.
Animals 13 00303 g002
Animals 13 00303 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of CGA on jejunal mRNA expression of tight junction genes in broilers under HD stress. ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA. (A) Relative mRNA expression at day 21. (B) Relative mRNA expression at day 28. (C) Relative mRNA expression at day 35. (D) Relative mRNA expression at day 42. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 10). Values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Figure 3. Effects of CGA on jejunal mRNA expression of tight junction genes in broilers under HD stress. ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA. (A) Relative mRNA expression at day 21. (B) Relative mRNA expression at day 28. (C) Relative mRNA expression at day 35. (D) Relative mRNA expression at day 42. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 10). Values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Animals 13 00303 g003
Animals 13 00303 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of CGA on jejunal mRNA expression of immune factors in broilers under HD stress. ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA. (A) Relative mRNA expression at day 21. (B) Relative mRNA expression at day 28. (C) Relative mRNA expression at day 35. (D) Relative mRNA expression at day 42. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 10). Values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Figure 4. Effects of CGA on jejunal mRNA expression of immune factors in broilers under HD stress. ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA. (A) Relative mRNA expression at day 21. (B) Relative mRNA expression at day 28. (C) Relative mRNA expression at day 35. (D) Relative mRNA expression at day 42. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 10). Values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Animals 13 00303 g004
Animals 13 00303 g005a 550Animals 13 00303 g005b 550Animals 13 00303 g005c 550Animals 13 00303 g005d 550
Figure 5. Effect of CGA supplementation on composition and diversity of cecal microbiota of chickens from the ND, HD, and HD + CGA datasets. (A–C) CGA was found to increase cecal microbial alpha diversity as measured by Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 indicators. (D) Venn diagram showing unique and shared numbers of genera predicted. (E) Two-dimensional OTU abundance based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of cecal microbiota. (F) Microbial composition at the phylum level. (G) Microbial composition at the genus level. (H) Abundance comparison of major species at the genera level, from left to right were Faecalibacterium and Alistipes. (I,J) Leaf and bar plots obtained by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis showed differences in the abundance of broiler fecal microbes. (K) The clustering heatmap of the top 20 genera in each sample. Green represents positive correlation and yellow indicates negative correlation. “*” presents a significantly different compared to HD group (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Effect of CGA supplementation on composition and diversity of cecal microbiota of chickens from the ND, HD, and HD + CGA datasets. (A–C) CGA was found to increase cecal microbial alpha diversity as measured by Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 indicators. (D) Venn diagram showing unique and shared numbers of genera predicted. (E) Two-dimensional OTU abundance based principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of cecal microbiota. (F) Microbial composition at the phylum level. (G) Microbial composition at the genus level. (H) Abundance comparison of major species at the genera level, from left to right were Faecalibacterium and Alistipes. (I,J) Leaf and bar plots obtained by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis showed differences in the abundance of broiler fecal microbes. (K) The clustering heatmap of the top 20 genera in each sample. Green represents positive correlation and yellow indicates negative correlation. “*” presents a significantly different compared to HD group (p < 0.05).
Animals 13 00303 g005aAnimals 13 00303 g005bAnimals 13 00303 g005cAnimals 13 00303 g005d
Table
Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient levels in the basal diet.
Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient levels in the basal diet.
Ingredient (g/kg)Starter (1–21 d)Grower (21–42 d)
Corn527.9577.8
Soybean meal368.9300.0
Zea gluten meal024.3
Soybean oil40.040.0
Sodium chloride3.03.0
Choline chloride3.02.6
Vitamin premix 20.30.3
Trace element premix 12.02.0
Stone powder12.211.7
Dicalcium phosphate19.116.2
DL-Methionine2.71.1
L-Lysine0.40.45
Wheat bran20.020.0
Total10001000
Metabolic energy (MJ/kg)12.413.0
Crude protein211.8198.4
Lysine11.410.5
Methionine4.94.8
Calcium10.28.5
Available P4.54.2
Total P6.96.3
Threonine7.72.2
Analyzed content
Calcium10.28.5
Total P6.86.2
Calcium: Total P 31.501.37
1 Trace element premix is provided as per kg of feed: 8 mg copper (CuSO4·5H2O); 80 mg iron (FeSO4); 100 mg manganese (MnSO4·H2O); 0.15 mg selenium (Na2SeO3); 0.35 mg iodine (KI). 2 Vitamin premix per kg feed: VA 9500 IU, VD 362.5 µg, VE 30 IU, VK 32.65 mg, VB1 2 mg, VB6 6 mg, VB12 0.25 mg, biotin 325 µg, folic acid 1.25 mg, pantothenic acid 12 mg, niacin 50 mg. 3 Calculated nutrient concentrations.
Table
Table 2. Primer sequences of target genes.
Table 2. Primer sequences of target genes.
Genes 1Forward Primer (5′-3′)Reverse Primer (5′-3′)LengthTM 2 °CAccession No
OCLNACGGCAGCACCTACCTCAAGGGCGAAGAAGCAGATGAG12351.7XM_025144247.2
CLDN1CATACTCCTGGGTCTGGTTGGTGACAGCCA TCCGCA TCTTCT10051.3NM_001013611.2
CLDN2CCTACATTGGTTCAAGCATCGTGAGATGTCGGGAGGCAGGTTGA13150.3NM_001277622.1
ZO-1CTTCAGGTGTTTCTCTTCCTCCTCCTGTGGTTTCA TGGCTGGATC14451.5XM_021098886.1
TNF-αGAGCGTTGACTTGGCTGTCAAGCAACAACCAGCTA TGCAC17655.4NM_214022.1
IL-1βACTGGGCA TCAAGGGCTAGGTAGAAGA TGAAGCGGGTC15455.6NM_214005.1
IL-6GCTGCGCTTCTACACAGATCCCGTTCTCA TCCA TCTTCTC20355.4NM_204628.1
IL-10AGAAATCCCTCCTCGCCAATAAATAGCGAACGGCCCTCA12151.2NM_001004414.2
GAPDHTGCTGCCCAGAACATCATCCACGGCAGGTCAGGTCAACAA14250–60NM_204305
1 Primer sequences of OCLN, CLDN1, CLDN2, ZO-1, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and GAPDH. 2 TM, Melting Temperature.
Table
Table 3. Effects of CGA on serum antioxidant parameters of broilers under HD stress.
Table 3. Effects of CGA on serum antioxidant parameters of broilers under HD stress.
ParameterDaysDietary Treatment 1SEMp-Value
NDND + CGAHDHD + CGA
MDA, (nmol/mL)213.56 b3.52 b5.19 a4.04 b0.220.01
284.49 b4.57 b5.88 a4.73 b0.200.03
354.96 a3.67 b5.59 a3.41 b0.25<0.01
424.334.765.543.910.270.16
SOD, (U/mL)21148.58148.13146.91147.373.550.14
28162.02 a154.63 ab146.70 b152.83 ab2.330.04
35150.43 ab158.70 a147.56 b156.89 a2.220.03
42156.96 a147.24 a126.91 b145.82 a3.920.03
GSH-Px, (U/mL)21975.78 a954.36 a674.99 b632.35 b9.440.03
28911.09 b936.76 ab825.41 c984.84 a14.75<0.01
35764.49 b992.03 a717.75 b823.66 a20.920.02
42910.00 ab990.15 a606.69 b992.31 a15.92<0.01
CAT, (U/mL)215.255.835.275.880.160.33
283.83 a4.29 a2.62 b1.19 b0.08<0.01
354.705.043.451.640.150.58
425.49 b6.64 a5.44 b6.90 a0.30<0.01
1 ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density group + basal diet + 0.15% CGA group. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 10). Values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Table
Table 4. Effects of CGA on jejunal morphology of broilers under HD stress.
Table 4. Effects of CGA on jejunal morphology of broilers under HD stress.
ParameterDaysDietary Treatment 1SEMp-Value
NDND + CGAHDHD + CGA
VH (µm)211034.03 a1023.68 a852.55 b946.17 ab21.43<0.01
281179.68 b1290.67 a976.53 c1122.33 b25.38<0.01
351335.00 ab1407.33 a1293.00 b1366.50 ab14.110.02
421477.331450.831435.501441.5027.070.39
CD (µm)21177.83 b171.77 b188.10 a182.37 a11.100.05
28179.36 a173.28 b181.00 a175.50 ab23.130.04
35171.73172.61168.65167.8019.130.38
42167.83 b167.77 b174.10 a173.37 a20.110.05
VH/CD215.73 a5.67 a4.56 b5.07 b0.13<0.01
286.74 b7.71 a5.74 c6.39 b0.18<0.01
357.788.167.678.150.090.13
428.81 a8.65 a8.24 b8.31 ab0.080.02
1 ND group, normal stocking density + basal diet; ND + CGA group, normal stocking density + basal diet + 0.15% CGA; HD group, high stocking density + basal diet; HD + CGA group, high stocking density group + basal diet + 0.15% CGA group. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 10). Values with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD test after one-way ANOVA).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, D.; Li, Y.; He, X.; Ito, K.; Liu, K.; Tan, H.; Zhen, W.; Zhang, B.; et al. Dietary Supplementation with Chlorogenic Acid Enhances Antioxidant Capacity, Which Promotes Growth, Jejunum Barrier Function, and Cecum Microbiota in Broilers under High Stocking Density Stress. Animals 2023, 13, 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020303

AMA Style

Liu Y, Zhang Y, Bai D, Li Y, He X, Ito K, Liu K, Tan H, Zhen W, Zhang B, et al. Dietary Supplementation with Chlorogenic Acid Enhances Antioxidant Capacity, Which Promotes Growth, Jejunum Barrier Function, and Cecum Microbiota in Broilers under High Stocking Density Stress. Animals. 2023; 13(2):303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yanhao, Yi Zhang, Dongying Bai, Yuqian Li, Xianglong He, Koichi Ito, Kexin Liu, Haiqiu Tan, Wenrui Zhen, Bingkun Zhang, and et al. 2023. "Dietary Supplementation with Chlorogenic Acid Enhances Antioxidant Capacity, Which Promotes Growth, Jejunum Barrier Function, and Cecum Microbiota in Broilers under High Stocking Density Stress" Animals 13, no. 2: 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020303

APA Style

Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Bai, D., Li, Y., He, X., Ito, K., Liu, K., Tan, H., Zhen, W., Zhang, B., & Ma, Y. (2023). Dietary Supplementation with Chlorogenic Acid Enhances Antioxidant Capacity, Which Promotes Growth, Jejunum Barrier Function, and Cecum Microbiota in Broilers under High Stocking Density Stress. Animals, 13(2), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop