Next Article in Journal
Effects of Dietary Betaine on the Laying Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, and Uterus and Ovary Function of Laying Hens at the Late Stage of Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of including of Japanese Pumpkin Seeds and Pomace in the Diets of Pacific White Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei)
Previous Article in Journal
An Update in Knowledge of Pigs as the Source of Zoonotic Pathogens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal Protein with Chlorella vulgaris Powder on the Growth and Intestinal Health of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 20
10.3390/ani13203282
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Lyophilized Açaí (Euterpe oleracea) Supplementation on Oxidative Damage and Intestinal Histology in Juvenile Shrimp Penaeus vannamei Reared in Biofloc Systems

by
Grecica Mariana Colombo
1,2,*,
Robson Matheus Marreiro Gomes
1,2,
Sonia Astrid Muñoz Buitrago
1,2,
Juan Rafael Buitrago Ramírez
1,2,
Alan Carvalho de Sousa Araujo
1,2,
Fernando Pablo Silva Oliveira
2,3,
Virgínia Fonseca Pedrosa
2,3,
Luís Alberto Romano
2,3,
Marcelo Tesser
2,4,
Wilson Wasielesky
2,5 and
José María Monserrat
1,2,6,*
1
Laboratório de Bioquímica Funcional de Organismos Aquáticos (BIFOA), Instituto de Oceanografia (IO), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande—FURG, Rua do Hotel, n° 02, Rio Grande CEP 96210-030, RS, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Aquicultura, Instituto de Oceanografía (IO), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande—FURG, Rio Grande CEP 96200-970, RS, Brazil
3
Laboratório de Imunologia e Patología de Organismos Aquáticos, Instituto de Oceanografía (IO), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande—FURG, Rio Grande 96200-970, RS, Brazil
4
Laboratório de Nutrição de Organismos Aquáticos (LANOA), Instituto de Oceanografía (IO), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande—FURG, Rio Grande 96200-970, RS, Brazil
5
Laboratório de Carcinocultura, Instituto de Oceanografia (IO), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande—FURG, Rio Grande 96200-970, RS, Brazil
6
Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande—FURG, Av. Itália km 8 s/n, Cx. P. 474, Rio Grande CEP 96200-970, RS, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(20), 3282; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203282
Submission received: 8 August 2023 / Revised: 29 September 2023 / Accepted: 13 October 2023 / Published: 20 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alternative Feedstuffs, Functional Foods and Feed Additives for Aquatic Organisms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Açaí (Euterpe oleracea) is a fruit of Amazonian origin rich in phenolic compounds, which are responsible for the high antioxidant capacity of this fruit. In addition to contributing to the maintenance of water quality, bioflocs serve as a supplementary food for farmed shrimp. Because they also contain bioactive compounds with antioxidant properties, the consumption of bioflocs by shrimp helps maintain the balance of physiological functions and the antioxidant status of these crustaceans. Studies have demonstrated the ability of bioflocs to incorporate exogenous antioxidants into a biofloc technology system (BFT). In this context, the antioxidants present in açaí, when added to the cultivation of juvenile shrimp Penaeus vannamei in a BFT system, can be assimilated by bioflocs, serving as a vector for the transfer of these bioactive compounds to the shrimp.

Abstract

The objective of this was to evaluate the ability of bioflocs to assimilate and transfer antioxidant compounds present in açaí Euterpe oleracea to juvenile Penaeus vannamei shrimp grown in a biofloc system. Juvenile shrimp were distributed into four treatment groups (control, 5, 20, and 80 mg açaí L−1), containing 31 shrimps/tank (90 L), and cultivated for 30 days. Every 24 h throughout the experimental period, the respective açaí concentrations were added directly to the cultivation water. The bioflocs and hepatopancreas lost their antioxidant capacity with increasing concentrations of açaí; however, lipid damage was mitigated after treatment with 20 mg of açaí L−1 (p < 0.05). The application of 20 mg açaí L−1 increased the mean height and area of the middle intestinal microvilli (p < 0.05). Mortality and protein and lipid damage in shrimp muscle increased with daily administration of 80 mg açaí L−1 (p < 0.05). It is concluded that the bioflocs were able to assimilate the antioxidants present in açaí and transfer them to the shrimp, and the administration of 20 mg açaí L−1 presented the best performance, demonstrating the possibility of its application in the cultivation of P. vannamei in a biofloc system.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Açaí (Euterpe oleracea) is a palm tree endemic to the Amazon region, in the states of Pará and Amazonas, where the world’s largest production of açaí is concentrated, with a culture corresponding to 87.5% of the Brazilian national market [1,2]. Among the various processed açaí genres, the most consumed part is the fruit, which is the main raw material for the production of juices and pulps [3,4]. Owing to its nutritional composition, açaí has gained notoriety in the financial and consumer markets, becoming the object of different studies because of its high content of proteins, lipids, fibers, and bioactive compounds with high antioxidant capacity [5,6,7].
The antioxidant activity observed in the fruit is directly related to the phenolic compounds, mainly from the flavonoid group. Among these, anthocyanins, phenolic acids, flavonols, and carotenoids are the most common, with anthocyanins being the main pigment responsible for the purple color of açaí and its significant antioxidant capacity [6]. These compounds are associated with nutritional, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticancer, cardiovascular, neurological, and antioxidant effects in humans and animals [6,8,9,10].
The production of aquatic organisms is subject to variations in different environmental factors common to cultivation, which can generate stress conditions in animals and contribute to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the reduction in antioxidant activity [11,12,13,14]. Although animals possess endogenous antioxidant defenses to cope with oxidative stress, a considerable amount of metabolic energy is required to improve or prevent this imbalance [15]. In this context, the supplementation or inclusion of food additives with a high antioxidant capacity in the diet of fish and shrimp serves as a strategy to increase the resistance of these organisms to stressful conditions [13,14,16,17].
Although scarce, studies on the application of açaí in shrimp diets have shown promising results regarding chemoprevention. The inclusion of 10% (w/w) açaí in the diet of P. vannamei shrimp cultivated in clear water showed a chemoprotective effect against ammonia exposure, resulting in an improvement in the antioxidant defense system and the attenuation of histopathological damage in the hepatopancreas [10], in addition to conferring protection against lipid damage in this same organ in shrimps challenged with saxitoxin [18].
In contrast to conventional production systems, the biofloc technology system (BFT) is characterized by minimal or no water exchange, reduced effluent release, high productivity, and biosafety [19,20]. Bioflocs have 18–43% protein in their composition and are responsible for contributing up to 29% of shrimp feed, contributing to reducing artificial feeding rates and improving feed conversion rates [21,22]. Because they contain proteins, fatty acids, minerals, vitamins, digestive enzymes, and antioxidant molecules, bioflocs not only serve as supplementary food for the growth of farmed shrimp but are also natural and abundant sources of bioactive compounds that contribute to the physiological health of crustaceans [22,23,24,25].
Recently, studies have been conducted on the application of lyophilized açaí in biofloc systems. In a study by Silva et al. [26], açaí was included directly in the diet composition of P. vannamei juveniles, at four concentrations tested (control, 2.5%, 5.0%, and 10.0% w/w). Although there were no effects on growth, the accumulation of flavonoids in the bioflocs and gills of the 5.0% açaí treatment group demonstrated the ability of bioflocs to absorb the antioxidants present in this fruit. Balancing and elaborating a diet that includes supplements require considerable effort. Therefore, the direct addition of açaí to cultivation appears to be more practical [27]. Studies by Leon et al. [25] and Colombo et al. [27] were pioneers in enriching bioflocs with antioxidants. Colombo et al. [27] reported the use of Amazonian fruit açaí as a natural source of antioxidants. The authors tested the daily addition of four concentrations of lyophilized açaí (control, 5, 20, and 80 mg of açaí L−1) to the culture of P. vannamei post-larvae. In addition to water quality parameters, such as maintaining average water alkalinity levels above 100 mg CaCO3 L−1, açaí improved the antioxidant status of bioflocs, mainly seen in the significant increase in the survival rate of the post-larvae of all treatment groups that received this fruit, which is critical in the production of the post-larvae in the nursery phase.
Therefore, due to the high antioxidant content and protection conferred by açaí to crustaceans, based on the same principle as that provided by Colombo et al. [27] for post-larvae, the present study aimed to continue the application of lyophilized açaí in a biofloc system for rearing juveniles of P. vannamei. Through biochemical and histological analyses and zootechnical parameters, we sought to evaluate the ability of shrimp to absorb antioxidants present in açaí, as well as the role of bioflocs in the assimilation and transfer of such bioactive compounds via food.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Shrimp Maintenance and Experimental Design

Penaeus vannamei shrimps with a medium initial weight of 0.96 to 1.10 g were obtained from a shrimp farming system at the Marine Aquaculture Station (EMA) of the Federal University of Rio Grande—FURG, located at Cassino Beach, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil. Lyophilized açaí (Euterpe oleracea) used in the present study were obtained from Amazônia Comércio de Açaí Liofilizado e Exportação LTDA, Belém, PA, Brazil.
The biofloc inoculum used in the experiment was collected from a super-intensive cultivation system of Pacific White Shrimp P. vannamei and distributed in four tanks (90 L of usable volume) without the presence of shrimp (pH 7.94, total ammonia 0.21 mg/L, nitrite 0.07 mg/L, nitrate 80.00 mg/L, phosphorus 4.30 mg/L, alkalinity 137.50 mg/L, SST 310 mg/L, and salinity of 30 ppt). For seven days, the bioflocs were enriched with three concentrations of açaí (5, 20, and 80 mg of açaí L−1), beyond the control treatment, added directly to the water in each tank every 24 h. These açaí concentrations were previously tested by Colombo et al. [27] for the cultivation of P. vannamei post-larvae in a biofloc system.
After biofloc enrichment, juvenile shrimps were stored in 12 circular polyethylene tanks with a useful volume of 90 L each, disposed in four treatments (control, 5, 20, and 80 mg of açaí L−1) in triplicate, containing 31 shrimps per tank. In each experimental unit, 67.5 L of seawater treated with a chlorine solution (10 ppm) and dechlorinated with ascorbic acid (1:1 w/w) and 22.5 L of biofloc inoculum previously enriched with açaí were used. The inoculum volume in each tank corresponded to 25% of the useful volume of the experimental units according to the methodology of Krummenauer et al. [20]. The experiment lasted 30 days and every 24 h, during the experimental period, the respective concentrations of lyophilized açaí were added directly to the cultivation water. Shrimps were fed twice a day with commercial feed GUABI® 35% crude protein (moisture 100 g, ethereal extract 100 g, crude fiber 40 g, and minerals 140 g), according to the protocol described by Jory [28]. Weekly biometrics (n = 12) were performed to adjust the ration provided. The aeration used during the enrichment of the inoculum with açaí and in the cultivation of shrimp was provided through aerotubes. The study was carried out in the laboratory with a photoperiod fixed at 12 h L/12 h D and a temperature and mean salinity of 29.80 °C ± 0.56 and 26.68 ppt ± 1.46, respectively.
Daily dissolved oxygen and temperature were measured using a multiparameter digital oximeter (YSI®-550A), and pH was measured using a digital pH meter (Alfakit, AT 315 SP). Total ammonia (TAN) (NH3 + NH4+), nitrite (N-NO2−), and nitrate (N-NO3−) were monitored following the protocols of UNESCO [29], and alkalinity [30], salinity (Alfakit refractometer), and total suspended solids (TSS) [31] were measured weekly during the study. For ammonia levels above 1 mg L−1, cane molasses was added to the experimental units as a carbon source in a proportion of 6 g of carbon for each 1 g of total ammoniacal nitrogen in the water, with the objective of adjusting the C:N ratio of the system [19,32]. When water alkalinity values were below 100 mg CaCO3 L−1, corrections with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) were performed to increase the alkalinity to 200 mg CaCO3 L−1 [33]. Treatments in which TSS levels exceeded 500 mg/L were used to remove excess total suspended solids, according to the methodology described by Gaona et al. [31]. A schematic drawing demonstrating the experimental groups and analyses performed in this study is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Zootechnical Performance and Proximal Analysis of Shrimp Bioflocs and Muscle

At the start and end of the experiment, individual shrimp were weighed to estimate the following zootechnical parameters:
  • Weight gain (g) = final weight − initial weight.
  • Specific growth ratio = [100% × (Ln final weight − Ln initial weight)/trial duration].
  • Feed conversion ratio = dry feed intake/weight gain.
  • Protein efficiency ratio = weight gain/dry protein intake.
  • Survival (%) = (final number of shrimps/initial number of shrimps) × 100.
Dry matter analysis was performed by drying the biofloc and muscle samples in an oven at 102 °C for 5 h. For ash analysis, the samples were precalcined and then placed in a muffle furnace at 600 °C for 5 h [34]. The crude protein content was determined after sample digestion and nitrogen distillation according to Kjeldahl’s protocol [35]. The lipid content was evaluated using a cold extraction method [36].

2.3. Biochemical Analysis

2.3.1. Homogenization of the Samples

At the end of the experiment, to collect the bioflocs, 1 L of water from each experimental unit was collected and added to the Imhoff cones, which were allowed to settle for 20 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the sedimentable solids were centrifuged at 1500× g for 15 min at 10 °C to remove excess water and stored in an ultrafreezer at −80 °C [25]. The homogenate of the bioflocs was obtained by sonicating the samples (QSonica Sonicators; Newtown, CT, USA) for 1 min in 30 ppt artificial salt water (Salt Veromix (São Paulo, Brazil), 95%, and 1:1 w/v), stirring in an orbital shaker at 80 rpm for 3 h and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C [27]. The shrimps were weighed individually, euthanized in liquid nitrogen, and the organs (gills, hepatopancreas, and muscle) were collected and homogenized (1:5 w/v) in a buffer solution for crustaceans (pH 7.2; Tris-base 20 mM; EDTA 1 mM; 0.05 mM MgCl2; 5 mM sucrose; and 1 mM KCl). The samples were centrifuged at 20,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were stored at −80 °C for biochemical analyses. The total protein content of the biofloc and shrimp samples was determined via the biuret method (550 nm) using a microplate reader (Biotek Synergy HT, Santa Clara, CA, USA) [37].

2.3.2. Total Antioxidant Capacity against Peroxyl Radicals (ACAP)

The analysis of the total antioxidant capacity against peroxyl radicals (ACAP) was performed as described by Amado et al. [37]. Samples of bioflocs and shrimp organs were exposed to peroxyl radicals generated by the thermal decomposition of ABAP (2,2-azobis-2-methylpropionamidine dihydrochloride) (Sigma Aldrich, São Paulo, Brazil) at 37 °C. When reacting with 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF), peroxyl radicals formed a fluorescent compound (DCF), which was detected using a spectrofluorometer (Biotek Synergy HT; Winooski, VT, USA) (excitation: 485 nm; emission: 535 nm). The ACAP was quantified using the relative area with and without ABAP, where a low relative area indicated a higher antioxidant capacity.

2.3.3. Lipid Peroxidation (TBARS)

Lipid peroxidation was measured using thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), as described by Oakes and Van Der Kraak [38]. The homogenates (bioflocs: 50 µL; gills: 50 µL; hepatopancreas: 30 µL; muscle: 100 µL) were added to glass tubes, along with 20 µL of BHT solution (butylated hydroxytoluene, 67 µM), 150 µL of solution of acetic acid 20%, 150 µL of TBA solution 0.8% (thiobarbituric acid), 50 µL of distilled water, and 20 µL of SDS 8.1% (sodium dodecyl sulfate), and were subsequently heated for 30 min at 95 °C. After cooling, 100 µL distilled water and 500 µL n-butanol were added to the final solution and centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min at 15 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a microplate, and readings (excitation: 520 nm; emission: 580 nm) were measured using a microplate spectrofluorometer (Biotek Synergy HT, part number 791000). Tetramethoxypropane (TMP, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) was used as a standard, and the results were expressed in TMP equivalents per mg of wet tissue.

2.3.4. Reduced Glutathione (GSH)

To measure the concentration of reduced glutathione (GSH), 240 μL the of sample extract (biofloc, gills, hepatopancreas, and muscle) and 28 μL of trichloroacetic acid (TCA 50% w/v) were added to Eppendorf tubes. After centrifugation at 20,000× g at 4 °C for 10 min, 100 μL of the supernatant was added to a transparent microplate, along with 200 μL Tris-Base 0.4 M at pH 8.9, and 10 μL of DTNB (5.5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid)) (Sigma Aldrich; São Paulo, Brazil), and was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min [39]. Absorbance readings (405 nm) were measured using a spectrofluorometer (Biotek Synergy HT, part number 791000) and the concentration was expressed as μmol of GSH per mg of protein.

2.3.5. Protein-Associated Sulfhydryl Groups (P-SH)

The concentration of sulfhydryl groups associated with the protein (P-SH) also followed the protocol described by Sedlak and Lindsay [39]. The protein precipitate from the biofloc and shrimp organ samples formed after GSH centrifugation was resuspended in 240 μL of artificial saline water and homogenization buffer for crustaceans, respectively, and 100 μL of the extract, 160 μL of Tris-Base 0.2 M) at pH 8.2, and 10 μL of DTNB were added to a transparent microplate. The microplate was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min, and absorbance (405 nm) was measured using a spectrofluorometer (Biotek Synergy HT, part number 791000). The final concentration was expressed as μmol of P-SH per mg of protein.

2.4. Histological Analysis

Three shrimps were collected per treatment and anesthetized with ice to collect the intestine, which was fixed in 10% formalin (NBF) for 24 h and later transferred to 70% alcohol. Samples of the anterior and middle intestines were processed in LEICA TP 1020 and included in the Paraplast. Intestines were sectioned into cross-sections at a thickness of 5 µm using a LEICA RM2245 rotary microtome and stained with hematoxylin–eosin (Harris hematoxylin), as suggested by Luna [40] and Romano and Pedrosa [41]. Histological slides were viewed under a Zeiss Primo Star optical photo microscope with an AxioCam ERc 5s camera (Göttingen, Germany). AxioVision LE 4.8.2 SP2 software (Göttingen, Germany) was used to analyze the photographs. The height, width, and area of intestinal microvilli were measured. Histological analysis was performed according to the protocol of Bullerwell et al. [42], in which four photos were taken per intestine (middle and posterior) of the shrimp, totaling 12 photos per treatment of each intestine. In each photograph, three microvilli were randomly selected to remove the established parameters. All measurements were performed using ImageJ Software 1.53.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The homogeneity of the variances of the different treatments was evaluated using the Levene test, and the normality of the data distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test. After verifying the assumptions, all data were subjected to a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the concentration of lyophilized açaí added to the cultivation of L. vannamei in the BFT system as the fixed factor and the experimental units of each treatment as the random factor [43]. Possible significant differences between treatments were detected using the Newman–Keuls test, and the significance level was set at 0.05.

3. Results

The results referring to the water quality parameters are listed in Table 1. During the experimental period, the physicochemical parameters of the water, such as dissolved oxygen, temperature, nitrite, and phosphorus, did not show statistical differences between the treatments (p > 0.05). The tanks that received 20 and 80 mg açaí L−1 showed an increase in mean pH values compared to the control treatment and 5 mg açaí L−1 (p < 0.05). The ammonia concentration increased in the 80 mg açaí L−1 treatment compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05); however, the nitrate concentration decreased significantly in the same treatment (p < 0.05). An increase in alkalinity was observed at concentrations above 20 mg açaí L−1 compared to the control treatment and 5 mg açaí L−1 (p < 0.05). The mean values of the total suspended solids increased proportionally with the concentration of lyophilized açaí added to the BFT system (p < 0.05).
The results of the proximal analysis of biofloc and shrimp muscles are presented in Table 2. The ash content of the bioflocs decreased proportionally with an increase in açaí concentration (p < 0.05). For shrimp muscle, no changes were observed in the content of dry matter, lipids, and ash (p > 0.05), but the protein content of the 5 mg açaí L−1 treatment was higher than that of the 20 and 80 mg açaí L−1 treatments (p < 0.05). Regarding the zootechnical parameters, only the survival rates showed a statistically significant difference (Table 3). The daily administration of 80 mg açaí L−1 resulted in higher shrimp mortality than the other treatments (p < 0.05).
The total antioxidant capacity (ACAP) of the bioflocs and hepatopancreas was lower (larger relative area) in treatments with 20 and 80 mg açaí L−1 and 5 and 20 mg açaí L−1, respectively, than in the control group (p < 0.05) (Figure 2a,c). No statistically significant differences were observed in the ACAP of the gills and muscles (p > 0.05) (Figure 2b,d). In relation to lipid peroxidation, the bioflocs, gills, and hepatopancreas showed a reduction in lipid damage (Figure 3). In bioflocs and gills, a decrease in lipid damage was observed at 20 and 80 mg of açaí L−1 compared to the other treatments (p < 0.05). In the hepatopancreas, a gradual decrease in lipid peroxidation was observed with increasing concentrations of lyophilized açaí (p < 0.05). There was an increase in lipid damage in the muscle in the 80 mg açaí L−1 treatment when compared to the control and 20 mg açaí L−1 treatments (p < 0.05).
The GSH levels of the bioflocs increased significantly in the treatments with 5 and 80 mg açaí L−1, which differed from the control and 20 mg açaí L−1 groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 4a). In the gills, GSH levels differed only between treatments that received açaí (p < 0.05); however, when compared to the control treatment, there were no significant differences (Figure 4b). No significant differences were observed in the hepatopancreas or muscle (p > 0.05) (Figure 4c,d). The P-SH levels of the bioflocs increased at a concentration of 80 mg açaí L−1 (p < 0.05); however, in the muscle tissue, at the same concentration, there was a decrease in the mean values of P-SH compared to the control treatment (p < 0.05) (Figure 5a,d). No statistical differences were observed in the gill and hepatopancreas (p > 0.05) (Figure 5b,c).
The results of histological analysis are presented in Table 4 and Figure 6 and Figure 7. When evaluating the data from the middle intestine of shrimp, the addition of 5 and 20 mg açaí L−1 contributed to an increase in the mean height and area of the intestinal microvilli (p < 0.05). However, in the posterior intestine, the application of 20 and 80 mg açaí L−1 in the BFT system decreased the mean height and area of the microvilli compared to the control treatment (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

The results of the water quality parameters of the present study highlighted that the daily addition of lyophilized açaí to the BFT system increased TSS levels; however, the mean values of total suspended solids remained below 500 mg/L, as recommended by Gaona et al. [31] (Table 1). The increase in açaí concentration in the 20 and 80 mg açaí L−1 treatments resulted in an increase in the pH and alkalinity of the water. Corrections with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) to maintain alkalinity levels during the experiment were only necessary in the control and the 5 and 20 mg of açaí L−1 treatment groups, corroborating the recent study by Colombo et al. [27], where corrections were performed only in the control and 5 mg of açaí L−1 treatments during the cultivation of post-larvae of P. vannamei in a BFT system. Açaí, as well as other fruits and vegetables, has antioxidant and alkalizing potential, intensifying according to the lower degree of food processing [44,45]. Therefore, the inclusion of 80 mg açaí L−1 in the water for the cultivation of P. vannamei juveniles in the BFT system maintained the alkalinity levels during the experimental period.
The action of nitrifying bacteria in the BFT system is of fundamental importance for the success of their activity, because they efficiently cycle nitrogenous compounds generated during cultivation [19]. The results of the present study demonstrated that the daily addition of 80 mg açaí L−1 to P. vannamei cultivation in a BFT system increased ammonia levels and decreased nitrate concentrations (Table 1), corroborating the results observed by Colombo et al. [27]. Considering the protein content of açaí—8.1% to 10.5% [7,26]—ally to the ration provided, it is possible that the ingestion of both by shrimp in the 80 mg açaí L−1 treatment contributed to an increase in ammonia excretion [46,47,48]. Another hypothesis is the possible inhibition of the action of nitrifying bacteria owing to the action of antioxidants present in the fruit. Studies have shown that the application of plant extracts with antioxidant capacity in agricultural soils can produce a toxic effect on nitrifying bacteria of the genus Nitrosomonas by blocking the ammonia monooxygenase pathway, an enzyme that acts in the first stage of the conversion of ammonia to nitrite [49,50,51]. In aquaculture, this reflects higher levels of ammonia in the culture water, and consequently, lower concentrations of nitrite and nitrate. However, the results of the present study and those of Colombo et al. [27] only identified changes in the ammonia and nitrate concentrations. The presence of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) nitrifying bacteria in the biofloc inoculum used in the experiment may have attenuated the inhibition of the ammonia monooxygenase pathway because ammonia was already converted to nitrate in the system. The addition of antioxidants during biofloc formation should be explored in future studies.
The ash levels in the bioflocs of the control treatments up to 20 mg açaí L−1 ranged from 45.61% to 40.47%, corroborating the results of Colombo et al. [27], who verified levels from 47.40% to 39.68% in the same treatments (Table 2). Similar values have been reported by Wasielesky et al. [21], Fernandes Da Silva et al. [52], and Reis et al. [53] that reported 44.85%, 45.50%, and 53.68% of ash in bioflocs from the cultivation of P. vannamei juveniles, respectively. According to studies by Silva et al. [26] and Odendaal and Schauss [7] the pulp of lyophilized açaí has an ash content of around 3.03% to 3.80%. In this context, the gradual decrease in the ash content of the bioflocs from the 20 mg açaí L−1 treatment was due to the accumulation of lyophilized açaí in the BFT system, which was incorporated into the biomass of the bioflocs.
Owing to their high protein content, bioflocs consumed by shrimp can replace a fraction of the required protein demand, thus complementing the artificial feed provided [21,54,55]. Considering the protein and lipid content of lyophilized açaí pulp [2,7], combined with the daily addition of this fruit to the artificial diet and the simultaneous production of bioflocs during the experimental period, we expected to verify an increase in the levels of protein and/or lipids in the bioflocs, as observed by Colombo et al. [27]; however, the differences were not statistically significant. The proximal composition of the muscle of juvenile P. vannamei also seemed to have been unaffected by the experimental treatments, although the protein content recorded was significantly higher in the 5 mg of açaí L−1 treatment compared to other treatments enriched with açaí, and did not differ from the control (Table 2).
In relation to bioflocs, the increase in açaí concentration influenced the loss of antioxidant capacity (larger relative area) (Figure 2a). Similar results were observed by Colombo et al. [27], where the enrichment of bioflocs with açaí for 27 days showed a dose–response behavior by decreasing the antioxidant capacity as the concentrations of this fruit increased. Quercetin, a phenolic compound with antioxidant properties, when applied to a culture of P. vannamei in a BFT system for 30 days also influenced the gradual loss of antioxidant capacity of the bioflocs [25]. In the present study, the loss of ACAP from the bioflocs may have influenced the decrease in the antioxidant capacity of the hepatopancreas (greater relative area) with the increase in açaí concentrations, mainly in the 5 and 20 mg açaí L−1 treatments (Figure 2a,c) because this organ is linked to the digestive process, secretion, and transport of several enzymes necessary for metabolism [54].
Although it lost its antioxidant capacity, the addition of 20 mg açaí L−1 prevented lipid peroxidation in the bioflocs, corroborating the results of Colombo et al. [27]; however, it was not sufficient to prevent oxidative damage to proteins in the same treatment group (Figure 3a). Peroxyl radicals are byproducts formed during lipid peroxidation; however, owing to their high antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds can act in the interception of ROS, preventing the propagation of the lipoperoxidation process [56,57]. The protein damage observed in the bioflocs was related to the oxidation and decrease in the sulfhydryl groups (-SH) caused by the action of ROS (Figure 5a) [58].
The increase in height and area of the microvilli in the middle intestine of the shrimp was stimulated by the application of 20 mg açaí L−1, suggesting better intestinal absorption of the nutrients present in the açaí and compensating for their absorption in the posterior intestine (Table 4). The function of the posterior intestine is associated with the compaction of feces and the formation of the fecal cord rather than the absorption of nutrients [59,60]. Increasing the length and area of intestinal microvilli, in addition to expanding the nutrient absorption surface, can also improve osmoregulation and the immune system of shrimp [61,62,63]. The degree of intestinal absorption of flavonoids is related to their chemical structures. According to Lipinski et al. (2001) [64], compounds that are more easily absorbed by the intestine contain up to five H-bond donors and ten H-bond acceptors, molecular weights less than 500 Da, and an octanol:water partition coefficient lower than 5. However, molecules with many hydroxyls, glycosidic groups, and galloyl groups in their structure are difficult to absorb in the intestine [65]. The main flavonoids found in açaí are orientin, homoorientin, vitexin, luteolin, chrysoeriol, quercetin, and dihydrokaempferol [66]. Therefore, the intestinal absorption capacity of açaí depends on the chemical structure of the main flavonoids present in the fruit.
Regarding the zootechnical results, the mortality registered in the treatment group with 80 mg açaí L−1 can be attributed to the effects provoked by the high administration of açaí, which may have exerted a pro-oxidant condition for the cultivation of P. vannamei juveniles, and to the low absorption of nutrients in the middle intestine (Table 3 and Table 4). The impairment of zootechnial parameters has been reported by Xiong et al. (2022) [67], where high levels of the antioxidant lipoic acid in diets with low levels of carbohydrates (15%) resulted in lower weight gain and specific growth rate. Açaí pulp has a high content and diversity of molecules that, when metabolized, can act as pro-oxidants in different shrimp organs [10]. The growth phases of P. vannamei cultivated in a BFT system enriched with açaí also seem to influence its oxidant state in different ways, as the survival of the post-larvae of the same species was affected by the addition of 80 mg açaí L−1 [27].
When analyzing biochemical data from the muscle of shrimp cultivated in the 80 mg açaí L−1 treatment, no differences were observed in ACAP and GSH levels (Figure 2d and Figure 4d). In the muscles of juvenile P. vannamei exposed to nano-encapsulated lipoic acid in a BFT system, there were no statistical differences in GSH levels [24]. The lack of response regarding antioxidant defenses may have aggravated the occurrence of protein and lipid oxidative damage in the muscle, contributing to the low survival (Figure 3d and Figure 5d). Despite the high mortality that occurred in the 80 mg açaí L−1 treatment, the antioxidant effects of lyophilized açaí in terms of a reduction in lipid peroxidation were evident in the gills and hepatopancreas (Figure 3b,c).

5. Conclusions

The 20 and 80 mg açaí L−1 concentrations acted as natural alkalinizers in the BFT system by maintaining water alkalinity levels above 100 mg CaCO3 L−1. In relation to nitrogenous compounds, more studies are needed to clearly demonstrate whether high concentrations of açaí in a biofloc system can interfere with nitrification. The application of up to 20 mg açaí L−1 was able to minimize oxidative damage in the bioflocs and organs of the shrimp, as well as to stimulate an increase in the height and area of the intestinal microvilli. The results demonstrated that the high mortality in the treatment group with 80 mg açaí L−1 in the BFT system was due to the pro-oxidant action of açaí and the low intestinal absorption capacity of the shrimp. It is concluded that the bioflocs were able to assimilate the antioxidants present in the açaí and transfer them to the shrimp, and among the different concentrations of açaí, the administration of 20 mg açaí L−1 presented the best performance in terms of biochemical parameters and histological studies, demonstrating the possibility of its application in the cultivation of P. vannamei in a biofloc system.

Author Contributions

G.M.C.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft. R.M.M.G.: investigation, formal analysis. S.A.M.B.: investigation, formal analysis. J.R.B.R.: investigation, formal analysis. A.C.d.S.A.: investigation, formal analysis. F.P.S.O.: investigation, formal analysis. V.F.P.: investigation, formal analysis. L.A.R.: resources, writing—review and editing. M.T.: resources, writing—review and editing. W.W.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing—review and editing. J.M.M.: conceptualization, methodology, resources, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. J. M. Monserrat and W. Wasielesky receive productivity research fellowships from the Brazilian agency CNPq (number processes PQ 308539/2016-8 and PQ 310652/2017-0, respectively).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Under current Brazilian legislation, Federal Law No. 11,794/08, Ethic Committees’ competence is linked to the evaluation of teaching and research activities involving vertebrate animals or materials, and the data derived from all or some of these. Under these circumstances, Federal University of Rio Grande—FURG, a federal institution, does not require ethics committee approval to conduct research on invertebrate species such as Penaeus vannamei. The shrimps used in the study belong to the Federal University of Rio Grande—FURG, where the experiments were conducted. The maintenance, feeding, and welfare of the shrimp were supervised by the head of the Carcinoculture Lab, Wilson Wasielesky, who is one of the co-authors of this manuscript.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in FigShare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23671809.v1 (accessed 12 October 2023).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support received by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científco e Tecnológico—CNPq (process number 433874/2018-0).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. CONAB—Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. 2020. Available online: https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/analises-do-mercado-agropecuario-e-extrativista/analises-do-mercado/historico-mensal-de-acai (accessed on 3 May 2023).
  2. Menezes, E.M.D.S.; Torres, A.T.; Sabaa Srur, A.U. Valor nutricional da polpa de açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart) lioflizada. Acta Amaz. 2008, 38, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. CONAB—Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Boletim da Sociobiodiversidade; CONAB: Brasília, Brazil, 2022; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lucas, B.F.; Zambiazi, R.C.; Costa, J.A.V. Biocompounds and physical properties of açaí pulp dried by different methods. Lebensm-Wiss Technol. 2018, 98, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martino, H.S.D.; dos Santos Dias, M.M.; Noratto, G.; Talcott, S.; Mertens-Talcott, S.U. Anti-lipidaemic and anti-inflammatory effect of açai (Euterpe oleracea Martius) polyphenols on 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 23, 432–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schauss, A.G. Advances in the study of the health benefts and mechanisms of action of the pulp and seed of the Amazonian palm fruit, Euterpe oleracea Mart., known as “Açai”. In Fruits, Vegetables, and Herbs; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 179–220. [Google Scholar]
  7. Odendaal, A.Y.; Schauss, A.G. Potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory flavonoids in the nutrient-rich Amazonian palm fruit, açaí (Euterpe spp.). In Polyphenols in Human Health and Disease; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 1, pp. 219–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. da Costa, C.A.; de Oliveira, P.R.B.; de Bem, G.F.; de Carvalho, L.C.R.M.; Ognibene, D.T.; da Silva, A.F.E.; Valença, S.S.; Pires, K.M.P.; Sousa, P.J.C.; de Moura, R.S.; et al. Euterpe oleracea Mart. derived polyphenols prevent endothelial dysfunction and vascular structural changes in renovascular hypertensive rats: Role of oxidative stress. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2012, 385, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Aranha, L.N.; Silva, M.G.; Uehara, S.K.; Luiz, R.R.; Neto, J.F.N.; Rosa, G.; de Oliveira, G.M.M. Effects of a hypoenergetic diet associated with açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) pulp consumption on antioxidant status, oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers in overweight, dyslipidemic individuals. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 39, 1464–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Colombo, G.M.; dos Santos Simião, C.; Schmitz, M.J.; Pedrosa, V.F.; Romano, L.A.; Tesser, M.B.; Monserrat, J.M. The role of açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart. 1824) as a chemoprotective agent in the evaluation of antioxidant defence, oxidative damage and histology of juvenile shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (BOONE, 1931) exposed to ammonia. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 1551–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Monserrat, J.M.; Lima, J.V.; Ferreira, J.L.R.; Acosta, D.; Garcia, M.L.; Ramos, P.B.; Barros Moraes, T.; Cougo dos Santos, L.; Amado, L.L. Modulation of antioxidant and detoxification responses mediated by lipoic acid in the fish Corydoras paleatus (Callychthyidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 148, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. da Silva Martins, A.C.; Artigas Flores, J.; Wasielesky Junior, W.; Zanette, J.; Primel, E.G.; Souza Caldas, S.; Monserrat, J.M. Modulation of antioxidant and detoxification responses induced by lipoic acid in the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) submitted to hypoxia and reoxygenation. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 2014, 47, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. da Silva, T.V.; Torres, M.F.; Sampaio, L.A.; Hamoy, M.; Monserrat, J.M.; Barbas, L.A.L. Dietary Euterpe oleracea Mart. attenuates seizures and damage to lipids in the brain of Colossoma macropomum. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 47, 1851–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brol, J.; Müller, L.; Prates, E.C.A.; de Farias, B.S.; Pedrosa, V.F.; de Almeida Pinto, L.A.; Cadaval, T.R.S., Jr.; Tesser, M.T.; Wasielesky, W.; Ventura-Lima, J. Dietary chitosan supplementation in Litopenaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc system: Effect on antioxidant status facing saline stress. Aquaculture 2021, 544, 737034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sokolova, I.M.; Frederich, M.; Bagwe, R.; Lannig, G.; Sukhotin, A.A. Energy homeostasis as an integrative tool for assessing limits of environmental stress tolerance in aquatic invertebrates. Mar. Environ. Res. 2012, 79, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. de Moura, L.B.; Cavalcante, J.G.; Nascimento, E.T.D.S.; Silva, I.C.; Salaro, A.L.; Barbas, L.A.L.; Veras, G.C.; Campelo, D.A.V. Dietary Euterpe oleracea essential oil, the Amazon Açaí, as feed additive to Amazonian ornamental fish, during post-larvae growing stage: A preliminary study. Fishes 2022, 7, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. dos Santos Simião, C.; Colombo, G.M.; Gomes, R.M.M.; Ramos, P.B.; Tesser, M.B.; Wasielesky Junior, W.; Monserrat, J.M. Chemoprotection of amazonian Mauritia flexuosa fruit pulp against ammonia and nitrite toxicity to postlarvae shrimps Litopenaeus vannamei. Bol. Inst. Pesca 2022, 48, e679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramos, P.B.; Colombo, G.M.; Schmitz, M.J.; Simião, C.S.; dos Santos Machado, K.; Werhli, A.V.; Monserrat, J.M. Chemoprotection mediated by açaí berry (Euterpe oleracea) in white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei exposed to the cyanotoxin saxitoxin analyzed by in vivo assays and docking modeling. Aquat. Toxicol. 2022, 246, 106148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ebeling, J.M.; Timmons, M.B.; Bisogni, J.J. Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of hotoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic control of ammonia-nitrogen in aquaculture production systems. Aquaculture 2006, 257, 346–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Krummenauer, D.; Samocha, T.; Poersch, L.H.; Lara, G.R.; Wasielesky, W. Effect of water reuse on the culture of Pacifc white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in BFT system. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2014, 45, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wasielesky, W.J.; Atwood, H.I.; Stokes, A.; Browdy, C.L. Effect of natural production in brown water super-intensive culture system for white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2006, 258, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khanjani, M.H.; Sharifinia, M. Biofloc technology as a promising tool to improve aquaculture production. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 1836–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, W.J.; Pan, L.Q. Effects of bioflocs on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and body composition of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei in zero-water exchange tanks manipulating C/N ratio in feed. Aquaculture 2012, 356, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. da Silva Martins, A.C.; Artigas Flores, J.; Porto, C.; Wasielesky Junior, W.; Monserrat, J.M. Antioxidant and oxidative damage responses in different organs of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) reared in a biofloc technology system. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 2015, 48, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leon, D.C.M.; Wasiliesky Junior, W.; Monserrat, J.M. Quercetin influence in water quality and biochemical responses of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei reared in biofloc technology system. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 3569–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silva, S.M.; Ramos, P.B.; Buitrago, J.R.; da Silva, T.V.; Simião, C.S.; Colombo, G.M.; Schmitz, M.; Tesser, M.B.; Prentice, C.; Wasielesky, W., Jr.; et al. Zootechnical performance, biochemical response, and chromaticity in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) (Boone, 1931) after the inclusion of lyophilized açaí (Euterpe oleracea) in the diet. Aquac. Int. 2020, 28, 1563–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Colombo, G.M.; dos Santos Simião, C.; Ramírez, J.R.B.; de Sousa Araujo, A.C.; Gomes, R.M.M.; Buitagro, S.A.M.; Wasielesky, W.; Monserrat, J.M. Bioflocs enriched with lyophilized açaí (Euterpe oleracea) improved the survival and weight gain of Litopenaeus vannamei post-larvae cultivated in the BFT system. Aquaculture 2023, 51, 1551–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jory, D.E. Feed management practices for a healthy pond environment. In The New Wave: Proceedings of the Special Session on Sustainable Shrimp Culture; Browdy, C., Jory, D.E., Eds.; World Aquaculture Society: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2001; pp. 118–143. [Google Scholar]
  29. UNESCO. Chemical methods for use in marine environmental monitoring. In Manuals and Guides 12; Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission: Paris, France, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  30. APHA (American Public Health Association). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1998; 1193p. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gaona, C.A.P.; Poersch, L.H.; Krummenauer, D.; Foes, G.K.; Wasielesky, W. The effect of solids removal on water quality, growth and survival of Litopenaeus vannamei in a biofloc technology culture system. Int. J. Recirc. Aquac. 2011, 11, 54–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Avnimelech, Y. Biofloc Technology—A Practical Guide Book; The World Aquaculture: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  33. Furtado, P.S.; Poersch, L.H.; Wasielesky, W.J. Effect of calcium hydroxide, carbonate and sodium bicarbonate on water quality and zootechnical performance of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei reared in bio-flocs technology (BFT) systems. Aquaculture 2011, 321, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. AOAC International. Offcial Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 16th ed.; AOAC International: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; p. 114. [Google Scholar]
  35. AOAC (Association of the Official Analytical Chemists). Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed.; AOAC: Arlington, VA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bligh, E.G.; Dyer, W.J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purifcation. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 27, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Amado, L.L.; Garcia, M.L.; Ramos, P.B.; Freitas, R.F.; Zafalon, B.; Ferreira, J.L.R.; Monserrat, J.M. A method to measure total antioxidant capacity against peroxyl radicals in aquatic organisms: Application to evaluate microcystins toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 2115–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oakes, K.D.; Van Der Kraak, G.J. Utility of the TBARS assay in detecting oxidative stress in white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) populations exposed to pulp mill effluent. Aquat. Toxicol. 2003, 63, 447–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sedlak, J.; Lindsay, R.H. Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal. Biochem. 1968, 25, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luna, L.G. Manual of histologic staining methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. In Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1968; p. xii-258. [Google Scholar]
  41. Romano, L.A.; Pedrosa, V.F. Re-claiming H&E: Back to the future. Postgrad. Med. J. 2020, 96, 58. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bullerwell, C.N.; Collins, S.A.; Lall, S.P.; Anderson, D.M. Growth performance, proximate and histological analysis of rainbow trout fed diets containing Camelina sativa seeds, meal (high-oil and solvent-extracted) and oil. Aquaculture 2016, 452, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Searle, S.R.; Casella, G.; McCulloch, C.E. Variance Components; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; p. 528. [Google Scholar]
  44. Schwalfenberg, G.K. The alkaline diet: Is there evidence that an alkaline pH diet benefits health? J. Environ. Public Health 2012, 2012, 727630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fardet, A.; Richonnet, C. Nutrient density and bioaccessibility, and the antioxidant, satiety, glycemic, and alkalinizing potentials of fruit-based foods according to the degree of processing: A narrative review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3233–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rosas, C.; Sanchez, A.; Diaz, E.; Soto, L.A.; Gaxiola, G.; Brito, R. Effect of dietary protein level on apparent heat increment and post-prandial nitrogen excretion of Penaeus setiferus, P. schmitti, P. duorarum, and P. notialis postlarvae. J. World Aquac. Soc. 1996, 27, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, M.; Yao, D.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Aweya, J.J. Effects of ammonia on shrimp physiology and immunity: A review. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 2194–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sui, Z.; Wei, C.; Wang, X.; Zhou, H.; Liu, C.; Mai, K.; He, G. Nutrient sensing signaling and metabolic responses in shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei under acute ammonia stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 253, 114672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Erickson, A.J.; Ramsewak, R.S.; Smucker, A.J.; Nair, M.G. Nitrifcation inhibitors from the roots of Leucaena leucocephala. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 6174–6177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cesco, S.; Mimmo, T.; Tonon, G.; Tomasi, N.; Pinton, R.; Terzano, R.; Neumann, G.; Weisskopf, L.; Renella, G.; Landi, L.; et al. Plant-borne flavonoids released into the rhizosphere: Impact on soil bio-activities related to plant nutrition. A review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2012, 48, 123–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tang, S.; Ma, Q.; Luo, J.; Xie, Y.; Pan, W.; Zheng, N.; Liu, M.; Wu, L. The inhibition effect of tea polyphenols on soil nitrification is greater than denitrification in tea garden soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 778, 146328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fernandes Da Silva, C.; Ballester, E.; Monserrat, J.; Geracitano, L.; Wasielesky, W., Jr.; Abreu, P.C. Contribution of microorganisms to the biofilm nutritional quality: Protein and lipid contents. Aquac. Nutr. 2008, 14, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Reis, W.G.; Wasielesky, W., Jr.; Abreu, P.C.; Brandão, H.; Krummenauer, D. Rearing of the Pacifc white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in BFT system with different photoperiods: Effects on the microbial community, water quality and zootechnical performance. Aquaculture 2019, 508, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Suita, S.M.; Cardozo, A.P.; Romano, L.A.; Abreu, P.C.; Wasielesky, W., Jr. Development of the hepatopancreas and quality analysis of post-larvae Pacifc white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei produced in a BFT system. Aquac. Int. 2014, 23, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yun, H.; Shahkar, E.; Katya, K.; Jang, I.K.; Kim, S.K.; Bai, S.C. Effects of bioflocs on dietary protein requirement in juvenile whiteleg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2016, 47, 3203–3214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Habotta, O.A.; Dawood, M.A.; Kari, Z.A.; Tapingkae, W.; Van Doan, H. Antioxidative and immunostimulant potential of fruit derived biomolecules in aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 130, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Naiel, M.A.; El-Kholy, A.I.; Negm, S.S.; Ghazanfar, S.; Shukry, M.; Zhang, Z.; Ahmadifar, E.; Abdel-Latif, H.M. A mini-review on plant-derived phenolic compounds with particular emphasis on their possible applications and beneficial uses in aquaculture. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2023; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M.C. Free radicals in Biology and Medicine, 5th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2015; p. 851. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pinn, E.H.; Nickell, L.A.; Rogerson, A.; Atkinson, R.J. Comparison of gut morphology and gut microflora of seven species of mud shrimp (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Mar. Biol. 1999, 133, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Garibay-Valdez, E.; Cicala, F.; Martinez-Porchas, M.; Gómez-Reyes, R.; Vargas-Albores, F.; Gollas-Galván, T.; Martínez-Córdova, L.F.; Calderón, K. Longitudinal variations in the gastrointestinal microbiome of the white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Talbot, P.; Clark, W.H.; Lawrence, A.L. Fine structure of the midgut epithelium in the developing brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus. J. Morphol. 1972, 138, 467–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Duan, Y.; Xiong, D.; Wang, Y.; Dong, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, J. Effects of Microcystis aeruginosa and microcystin-LR on intestinal histology, immune response, and microbial community in Litopenaeus vannamei. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Klahan, R.; Deevong, P.; Wiboonsirikul, J.; Yuangsoi, B. Growth Performance, feed utilisation, endogenous digestive enzymes, intestinal morphology, and antimicrobial effect of Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) fed with feed supplemented with pineapple waste crude extract as a functional feed additive. Aquac. Nutr. 2023, 2023, 1160015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 46, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gonzales, G.B.; Smagghe, G.; Grootaert, C.; Zotti, M.; Raes, K.; Camp, J.V. Flavonoid interactions during digestion, absorption, distribution and metabolism: A sequential structure–activity/property relationship-based approach in the study of bioavailability and bioactivity. Drug Metab. Rev. 2015, 47, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kang, J.; Li, Z.; Wu, T.; Jensen, G.S.; Schauss, A.G.; Wu, X. Anti-oxidant capacities of flavonoid compounds isolated from acai pulp (Euterpe oleracea Mart.). Food Chem. 2010, 122, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xiong, Y.; Li, Q.; Ding, Z.; Zheng, J.; Zhou, D.; Wei, S.; Han, X.; Chang, X.; Li, X.; Xue, Y. Dietary α-lipoic acid requirement and its effects on antioxidant status, carbohydrate metabolism, and intestinal microflora in oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense (De Haan). Aquaculture 2022, 547, 737531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 13 03282 g001
Figure 1. Experimental groups and analyses used in this study. ACAP: total antioxidant capacity against peroxyl radicals. TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. GSH: reduced glutathione. P-SH: Protein-associated sulfhydryl groups. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Experimental groups and analyses used in this study. ACAP: total antioxidant capacity against peroxyl radicals. TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. GSH: reduced glutathione. P-SH: Protein-associated sulfhydryl groups. Created with BioRender.com.
Animals 13 03282 g001
Animals 13 03282 g002
Figure 2. Values of total antioxidant capacity against peroxyl radicals (expressed in relative area) in the bioflocs (a), gills (b), hepatopancreas (c), and muscle (d) of Penaeus vannamei shrimp after the addition of different concentrations of lyophilized açaí for 30 days. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters indicate statistical differences between the concentrations of lyophilized açaí according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Figure 2. Values of total antioxidant capacity against peroxyl radicals (expressed in relative area) in the bioflocs (a), gills (b), hepatopancreas (c), and muscle (d) of Penaeus vannamei shrimp after the addition of different concentrations of lyophilized açaí for 30 days. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters indicate statistical differences between the concentrations of lyophilized açaí according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Animals 13 03282 g002
Animals 13 03282 g003
Figure 3. Levels of lipid peroxidation (nmol TMP/mg per tissue) in the bioflocs (a), gills (b), hepatopancreas (c), and muscle (d) of Penaeus vannamei shrimp after the addition of different concentrations of lyophilized açaí for 30 days. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05. TMP is tetramethoxypropane, which was used as the standard.
Figure 3. Levels of lipid peroxidation (nmol TMP/mg per tissue) in the bioflocs (a), gills (b), hepatopancreas (c), and muscle (d) of Penaeus vannamei shrimp after the addition of different concentrations of lyophilized açaí for 30 days. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05. TMP is tetramethoxypropane, which was used as the standard.
Animals 13 03282 g003
Animals 13 03282 g004
Figure 4. Concentration of reduced glutathione (GSH, μmol/mg protein) in the bioflocs (a), gills (b), hepatopancreas (c), and muscle (d) of Penaeus vannamei shrimp after the addition of different concentrations of lyophilized açaí for 30 days. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Figure 4. Concentration of reduced glutathione (GSH, μmol/mg protein) in the bioflocs (a), gills (b), hepatopancreas (c), and muscle (d) of Penaeus vannamei shrimp after the addition of different concentrations of lyophilized açaí for 30 days. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Animals 13 03282 g004
Animals 13 03282 g005
Figure 5. Concentration of protein sulfhydryl groups (μmol/mg protein) in the bioflocs (a), gills (b), hepatopancreas (c), and muscle (d) of Penaeus vannamei shrimp after the addition of different concentrations of lyophilized açaí for 30 days. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Figure 5. Concentration of protein sulfhydryl groups (μmol/mg protein) in the bioflocs (a), gills (b), hepatopancreas (c), and muscle (d) of Penaeus vannamei shrimp after the addition of different concentrations of lyophilized açaí for 30 days. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Animals 13 03282 g005
Animals 13 03282 g006
Figure 6. Middle intestine of juvenile shrimp Penaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea for 30 days. (A)—Control; (B)—5 mg açaí L−1; (C)—20 mg açaí L−1; (D)—80 mg açaí L−1. H-E. BAR: 10 µm.
Figure 6. Middle intestine of juvenile shrimp Penaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea for 30 days. (A)—Control; (B)—5 mg açaí L−1; (C)—20 mg açaí L−1; (D)—80 mg açaí L−1. H-E. BAR: 10 µm.
Animals 13 03282 g006
Animals 13 03282 g007
Figure 7. Posterior intestine of juvenile shrimp Penaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea for 30 days. (A)—Control; (B)—5 mg açaí L−1; (C)—20 mg açaí L−1; (D)—80 mg açaí L−1. H-E. BAR: 10 µm.
Figure 7. Posterior intestine of juvenile shrimp Penaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea for 30 days. (A)—Control; (B)—5 mg açaí L−1; (C)—20 mg açaí L−1; (D)—80 mg açaí L−1. H-E. BAR: 10 µm.
Animals 13 03282 g007
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters of water during shrimp Penaeus vannamei reared in the biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 3).
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters of water during shrimp Penaeus vannamei reared in the biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 3).
ParametersTreatments
Control5 mg L−120 mg L−180 mg L−1
Dissolved oxygen (mg L−1)6.13 ± 0.03 a6.25 ± 0.04 a6.19 ± 0.04 a6.16 ± 0.03 a
Temperature29.85 ± 0.06 a29.67 ± 0.07 a29.84 ± 0.07 a29.84 ± 0.05 a
pH7.93 ± 0.009 a7.92 ± 0.008 a7.97 ± 0.008 b8.01 ± 0.005 c
Ammonia (mg TAN L−1)0.31 ± 0.05 a0.30 ± 0.04 a0.32 ± 0.04 a0.71 ± 0.06 b
Nitrite—N (mg L−1)0.16 ± 0.02 a0.16 ± 0.02 a0.21 ± 0.04 a0.27 ± 0.05 a
Nitrate—N (mg L−1)44.95 ± 4.61 a40.78 ± 3.68 a32.51 ± 2.72 a17.63 ± 1.48 b
Phosphorus—P (mg L−1)2.06 ± 0.35 a2.16 ± 0.37 a1.86 ± 0.28 a1.70 ± 0.28 a
Alkalinity (mg CaCO3 L−1)113.13 ± 5.09 a135.63 ± 4.77 a159.69 ± 6.02 b197.50 ± 5.31 c
Salinity26.48 ± 0.31 a26.65 ± 0.27 a27.05 ± 0.36 a26.55 ± 0.34 a
TSS (mg L−1)213.89 ± 16.98 a266.85 ± 24.88 b323.52 ± 30.05 c341.11 ± 25.38 c
Different letters on the same line indicate significant differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Table 2. Proximal composition of the biofloc and muscle of Penaeus vannamei shrimp reared in the biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 6).
Table 2. Proximal composition of the biofloc and muscle of Penaeus vannamei shrimp reared in the biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 6).
ParametersTreatments
Control5 mg L−120 mg L−180 mg L−1
(A) Biofloc
Dry matter (%)14.64 ± 0.82 a13.16 ± 0.86 a12.09 ± 0.19 a13.91 ± 0.21 a
Protein (%)30.02 ± 0.57 a29.56 ± 0.42 a27.73 ± 0.36 a32.27 ± 1.58 a
Ether extract (%)2.62 ± 0.65 a2.70 ± 0.49 a4.01 ± 0.95 a4.27 ± 0.33 a
Ash (%)45.61 ± 0.26 c44.92 ± 0.30 c40.47 ± 0.69 b27.74 ± 0.88 a
(B) Muscle
Dry matter (%)23.59 ± 0.27 a23.47 ± 0.24 a24.04 ± 0.33 a25.13 ± 0.59 a
Protein (%)76.23 ± 1.12 ab77.75 ± 0.44 b74.44 ± 1.35 a74.80 ± 0.92 a
Ether extract (%)2.58 ± 0.34 a1.95 ± 0.39 a3.68 ± 0.85 a3.33 ± 0.21 a
Ash (%)6.26 ± 0.09 a6.42 ± 0.07 a6.37 ± 0.08 a5.59 ± 0.34 a
Different letters on the same line indicate significant differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Table 3. Zootechnical parameters of Penaeus vannamei shrimp reared in the biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 31). Abbreviations: SGR—specific growth ratio; FCR—feed conversion ratio; PER—protein efficiency ratio.
Table 3. Zootechnical parameters of Penaeus vannamei shrimp reared in the biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 31). Abbreviations: SGR—specific growth ratio; FCR—feed conversion ratio; PER—protein efficiency ratio.
ParametersTreatments
Control5 mg L−120 mg L−180 mg L−1
Initial weight (g)1.09 ± 0.04 a1.10 ± 0.04 a1.06 ± 0.05 a0.96 ± 0.04 a
Final weight (g)3.95 ± 0.16 a4.14 ± 0.17 a3.80 ± 0.16 a3.56 ± 0.30 a
Weight gain (g)2.83 ± 0.15 a2.97 ± 0.17 a2.78 ± 0.16 a2.65 ± 0.30 a
SGR (%/day)4.05 ± 0.13 a4.06 ± 0.15 a4.03 ± 0.13 a3.98 ± 0.32 a
FCR2.00 ± 0.10 a2.27 ± 0.15 a2.27 ± 0.13 a1.90 ± 0.26 a
PER1.52 ± 0.08 a1.47 ± 0.08 a1.47 ± 0.09 a1.91 ± 0.21 a
Survival (%)79.57 ± 18.84 b92.47 ± 7.53 b88.45 ± 3.61 b38.71 ± 8.53 a
Different letters on the same line indicate significant differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Table 4. Histological analysis of the middle and posterior intestines of shrimp Penaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters on the same line indicate significant differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Table 4. Histological analysis of the middle and posterior intestines of shrimp Penaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc technology system (BFT) with different concentrations of açaí Euterpe oleracea. Values are expressed as mean ± 1 standard error (n = 12). Different letters on the same line indicate significant differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
TreatmentsMiddle IntestinePosterior Intestine
Width (µm)Height (µm)Area (µm2)Width (µm)Height (µm)Area (µm2)
Control32.70 ± 2.15 a24.10 ± 2.91 a674.34 ± 101.13 a34.86 ± 3.51 a29.49 ± 1.73 a903.32 ± 127.90 c
5 mg L−136.50 ± 3.45 a36.99 ± 4.31 b1311.42 ± 223.48 b35.92 ± 3.91 a27.26 ± 2.88 a819.45 ± 111.33 bc
20 mg L−140.89 ± 3.05 a50.64 ± 3.70 c1981.28 ± 212.50 c26.77 ± 2.76 a19.59 ± 1.84 b532.58 ± 98.49 ab
80 mg L−131.64 ± 2.06 a28.31 ± 2.70 ab921.03 ± 149.19 ab28.66 ± 1.65 a16.18 ± 0.58 b443.39 ± 33.26 a
Different letters on the same line indicate significant differences between treatments according to the Newman–Keuls test at a significance level of 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Colombo, G.M.; Marreiro Gomes, R.M.; Muñoz Buitrago, S.A.; Buitrago Ramírez, J.R.; de Sousa Araujo, A.C.; Silva Oliveira, F.P.; Pedrosa, V.F.; Romano, L.A.; Tesser, M.; Wasielesky, W.; et al. Effects of Lyophilized Açaí (Euterpe oleracea) Supplementation on Oxidative Damage and Intestinal Histology in Juvenile Shrimp Penaeus vannamei Reared in Biofloc Systems. Animals 2023, 13, 3282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203282

AMA Style

Colombo GM, Marreiro Gomes RM, Muñoz Buitrago SA, Buitrago Ramírez JR, de Sousa Araujo AC, Silva Oliveira FP, Pedrosa VF, Romano LA, Tesser M, Wasielesky W, et al. Effects of Lyophilized Açaí (Euterpe oleracea) Supplementation on Oxidative Damage and Intestinal Histology in Juvenile Shrimp Penaeus vannamei Reared in Biofloc Systems. Animals. 2023; 13(20):3282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Colombo, Grecica Mariana, Robson Matheus Marreiro Gomes, Sonia Astrid Muñoz Buitrago, Juan Rafael Buitrago Ramírez, Alan Carvalho de Sousa Araujo, Fernando Pablo Silva Oliveira, Virgínia Fonseca Pedrosa, Luís Alberto Romano, Marcelo Tesser, Wilson Wasielesky, and et al. 2023. "Effects of Lyophilized Açaí (Euterpe oleracea) Supplementation on Oxidative Damage and Intestinal Histology in Juvenile Shrimp Penaeus vannamei Reared in Biofloc Systems" Animals 13, no. 20: 3282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop