Next Article in Journal
The Occurrence of Cattle Tick Fever in a Region of the Atlantic Forest on the Border with the Caatinga in Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Feeding Corn Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles on Muscle Quality Traits and Lipidomics Profiling of Finishing Pigs
Previous Article in Journal
Hemosiderin-Laden Macrophages in Canine Mammary Carcinomas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fatty Acid Profile and Lipid Quality Indexes of the Meat and Backfat from Porkers Supplemented with EM Bokashi Probiotic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 23
10.3390/ani13233635
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Supplementing Growing–Finishing Crossbred Pigs with Glycerin, Vitamin C and Niacinamide on Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality

by
Linglan Deng
1,2,†,
Shaobin Hao
1,2,†,
Wanjie Zou
1,2,
Panting Wei
1,2,
Wenchen Sun
1,2,
Huadong Wu
2,
Wei Lu
1,2 and
Yuyong He
1,2,*
1
Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Engineering Research Center of Feed Development, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
2
College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2023, 13(23), 3635; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233635
Submission received: 27 October 2023 / Revised: 11 November 2023 / Accepted: 14 November 2023 / Published: 24 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional Strategies for Healthy Pork Meat)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Improving the color and flavor of pork from commercial crossbred pigs using nutritional measures is a major issue that needs to be urgently addressed. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of supplementing the diets of growing–finishing pigs with glycerin and/or a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide on carcass traits and pork quality. The results showed that the simultaneous supplementation of growing–finishing crossbred pigs with glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide can improve the color, flavor and nutritional value of pork by significantly increasing the redness (a*) value, glycerol content and myristoleic acid content of the longissimus dorsi; this is also achieved by numerically increasing the levels of flavor amino acids, linoleic acid, linolenic acid and erucic acid, as well as the percentage and density of type I myofibers in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle. Glycerin had a significant influence on the erucic acid content in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle, and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide had a significant interaction effect on the redness (a*) value of the longissimus dorsi. The glycerol content in the longissimus dorsi was significantly affected by glycerin, the interaction between vitamin C and niacinamide, and the interaction between glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide. This study is valuable in improving pork quality and increasing consumers’ desire to purchase these products.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of supplementing the diet of growing–finishing pigs with glycerin and/or a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide on carcass traits and pork quality. Eighty-four weaned piglets with an initial average body weight of 20.35 ± 2.14 kg were assigned, at random, to four groups for a 103-day feeding experiment: control; glycerin-supplemented group; vitamin C and niacinamide-supplemented group; and glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide-supplemented group. At the end of the experiment, three pigs/group were randomly selected and slaughtered, and samples were collected for analysis. The results indicated that supplementing crossbred pigs with glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide simultaneously increased the redness (a*) value (p < 0.05), glycerol content (p < 0.01) and myristoleic acid content (p < 0.01) in the longissimus dorsi and tended to increase the level of flavor amino acids, linoleic acid, linolenic acid and erucic acid, as well as the percentage and density of type I myofibers in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle. Glycerin had an influence (p < 0.01) on the erucic acid content in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle, and vitamin C and niacinamide had an interaction effect (p < 0.05) on the redness (a*) value of the longissimus dorsi. Glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide supplementation in the diet of crossbred pigs improved the color, flavor and nutritional value of pork, which contributed to an increased intent to purchase this product.

1. Introduction

Genetically improving crossbred pigs for a greater growth rate and lean percentage deteriorates their pork quality [1]; however, the consumer demand for pork with a bright red color, juiciness, tenderness and good flavor is increasing [2,3,4], and this is accompanied by an equally increasing demand for improved welfare conditions [5,6]. It is reported that the color of meat is generally controlled by deoxymyoglobin (DeoMb, purple-red), oxymyoglobin (OxyMb, bright red) and metmyoglobin (MetMb, brown), and can be improved by transforming MetMb into DeoMb and OxyMb via the action of enzymes or antioxidants such as vitamin C and niacinamide [7,8]. Nutritional regulation and feeding strategies are two effective means of improving pork quality [9,10,11]; thus, improving pork quality through nutritional means is a major issue that needs to be urgently addressed.
The palatability of the feed is a significant factor that needs to be addressed, owing to the effect that the palatability of feed has on meat quality [12]. Glycerin is a sweet-tasting by-product of biodiesel production that has good palatability. It has attracted public attention because it is a viable alternative to corn, particularly owing to its high energy value and growing market supply [13,14]. Previous studies have verified the effect that adding crude glycerin to drinking water or employing it as a substitution for corn has on the performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of pork; however, the results are still not consistent, as some data have indicated that a short-term glycerin supplementation of up to 15% in finishing pigs via drinking water or glycerin feeding has no negative effects on growth performance, carcass characteristics or pork quality [15,16,17,18]; meanwhile, other data have shown that the addition of glycerin to the diet of animals changes the fatty acid profile [19] or elevates the unsaturated fatty acid content [17,20,21] of meat. Vitamin C is capable of reducing the production of reactive oxygen species to protect cellular components such as lipids and proteins from damage and prolonging the reducing environment [22,23]. Adding vitamin C to the feed has been found to increase the concentration of vitamin C in muscle [24], while the treatment of meat with vitamin C solution has been found to decrease its brown metmyoglobin percentage and increase its bright red oxymyoglobin percentage [22,24]. Nicotinamide is a constituent of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)-dependent MetMb reducing enzyme system, and a higher redness (a*) value and color stability in meat can be achieved by transforming MetMb into DeoMb and OxyMb under the action of NADH-dependent MetMb reductase [25,26].
The influence of supplementing the diets of growing–finishing crossbred pigs with glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide on pork quality has still not been reported. We hypothesized that glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide supplements would improve meat quality by increasing the marbling score and redness (a*) value of pork, and this study evaluated the effects of supplementing glycerin and/or a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide on the carcass characteristics, chemical composition, amino acid composition and fatty acid profile of pork.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals, Basal Diet and Slaughter

A total of 84 weaned piglets (Duroc × Large White × Landrace) with initial body weights of 20.35 ± 2.14 kg were allocated to group A, group B, group C and group D at random using a 2 × 2 factorial design (glycerol: 0, 10; mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide: 0 + 0, 0.06 + 0.05) and offered the designated diets (Table 1). All piglets were housed in pens with concrete floors and had free access to food and water during the 103-day feeding experiment. At the end of the experiment, 3 pigs from each group were randomly selected, weighed after 12 h of fasting, slaughtered via bleeding after the application of electrical stimulus (225–380 V, 1.5 A, 5–6 s), and eviscerated. The final average live weights of the pigs slaughtered in groups A, B, C and D were 106.17 ± 8.39 kg, 106.00 ± 1.41 kg, 102.33 ± 10.21 kg and 109.17 ± 7.53 kg, respectively.
Food-grade glycerin (purity > 99.5%) was purchased from Sichuan Lvcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Sichuan, China), and feed-grade Vitamin C (purity > 95.0%) and niacinamide (purity > 99.0%) were provided by Jiangxi Tianxin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Leping, China).

2.2. Blood Sampling and Serum Biochemical Parameters

Blood samples were taken from the anterior vena cava of the pigs on day 50 and day 101 of the experiment, respectively, and centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C with a speed of 3000 r/min; then, the sample of serum was immediately collected and stored at −20 °C. The concentration of glucose (GLU) and lipids (total cholesterol, TC; triglyceride, TG; high-density lipoprotein, HDL; low-density lipoprotein, LDL; very-low-density lipoprotein, vLDL; non-esterified fatty acid, NEFA) in the serum was measured using an automatic biochemical analyzer (Mindray BS-240, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). A commercially available kit (HY-N0098, Beijing SINO-UK Institute of Biological Technology, Beijing, China) was used to measure the serum glycerol concentrations. The concentrations of transferrin (TF) and ferritin (FER) in the serum were determined using ELISA kits (Beijing SINO-UK Institute of Biological Technology, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. Sample Collection, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality

The carcass was divided into halves immediately after slaughter and the hot carcass weight was determined. The carcass length was measured on the left side of each carcass in a straight line, from the anterior edge of the first rib to the pubic bone, using a measuring tape. The back fat thickness was calculated by averaging the scores of three regions at the first rib, last rib and last lumbar vertebrae of the left carcass side. The back fat thickness was measured using a digital vernier caliper, between the 12th and 13th ribs over the longissimus dorsi, and averaged over three points. The loin muscle area was measured on the left side of the carcass using a compensating planimeter, after a cross-section cut was made between the 12th and 13th ribs; then, the muscle pH (pH 45 min; 45 min after slaughter) was measured using a Mettler M1120x pH meter (Mettler, Toledo International Inc., Columbus, OH, USA) in the center of the longissimus dorsi muscle.
Marbling was measured in the longissimus dorsi between the 12th and 13th ribs using the scoring standards of the National Pork Producer Council. The meat color parameters L* (lightness), a* (redness) and b* (yellowness) were measured at four sites on each longissimus dorsi using a Minolta CR400 colorimeter (Konica Minolta, Osaka, Japan)
Samples of the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus on the left side of the carcass were collected 1 h after the postmortem between the 12th and 13th ribs, then immediately refrigerated (4 °C) to analyze the chemical composition and the content of amino acids and fatty acids.

2.4. Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide-Tetrazolium Reductase (NADH-TR) Staining [27]

The samples of muscle were embedded with an OCT complex (Sakura, Torrance, CA, USA), cross-sectioned into serial slices with a thickness of 10 μm using a HS-3060 cryostat microtome (Jinhua Hisure Technology Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China), and then allowed to dry. After washing with PBS to remove the OCT complex, the slices were treated with the NADH-TR kit (Beijing SINO-UK Institute of Biological Technology, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions; then, myofibers of type I, IIa and IIb were stained dark blue, blue and light blue, respectively.
Images of the slices were obtained using a color camera (IK-642K, Toshiba, Japan), six fields of view were randomly selected from each slice, and the image analysis system (Image-Pro Plus, Media Cybernetics, L.P., Rockville, MD, USA) was use d to analyze the percentage, diameter, cross-sectional area and density of the myofibers.

2.5. Proximate Composition of Meat

The dry matter content was measured via freeze drying to a constant weight. The N content was determined using the Kjeldahl method described in AOAC (2006), and the crude protein was calculated as 6.25 × N. The crude fat was determined by extracting samples with petroleum ether in an automatic Soxhlet extractor (Gerhardt Analytical Systems, Königswinter, Germany).

2.6. Content of Myoglobin and Glycerol in Muscle

The concentrations of myoglobin and glycerol in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus were determined using ELISA kits (Shanghai Enzyme-linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7. Amino Acids and Fatty Acid Profile

Freeze-dried muscle (about 1 g) was first ground, then hydrolyzed at 110 °C for 22 h in hydrochloric acid solution (15 mL, 6 mol/L). Further, the solution was diluted to 100 mL with water and centrifuged. The samples of supernatants were filtered with a 0.22 µm membrane prior to analysis using an automatic amino acid analyzer (L8800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Approximately 6 g of freeze-dried muscle was ground, then cold-extracted with a solution of chloroform–methanol at a ratio of 2:1 to obtain lipids. The lipids were dried at 35 °C under vacuum conditions and then stored at −80 °C for the preparation of the fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). A gas chromatograph (Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a ZB-FAMEs GC capillary column (60 m * 0.25 mm * 0.2 μm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was used to separate and quantify the FAMEs.
The chromatographic conditions were as follows: an initial column temperature of 100 °C was held for 13 min, then increased at 10 °C/min increments to 180 °C for 6 min, then heated at 1 °C/min to 200 °C for 20 min, and then increased again at 4 °C/min increments up to a final temperature of 230 °C for 10.5 min. Nitrogen gas was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 0.9 mL/min. The split flow was 8 mL/min with a 1 μL injection volume. FAMEs were identified using authentic standards, and peak integration and quantification were performed with Shimadzu CLASS VP software (Version 4.3, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 26.0 (IBM Inc., New York, NY, USA) software was utilized to perform the statistical analyses, the comparison of multiple groups was conducted using two-way ANOVA, and an LSD test was used to determine the significance of differences. All data were checked for normal distribution [28], and normally distributed data were expressed as means ± SEM; and differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition of Serum

The chemical composition of the serum is given in Table 2, and no statistical difference (p > 0.05) was observed in the serum concentration of the lipids, glucose, glycerol, transferrin and ferritin among the four treatment groups. The level of serum glycerol was influenced (p < 0.05) by the interaction between glycerin and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide, or by the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide; the addition of glycerin had an impact (p < 0.05) on the TG concentration of the serum collected from pigs at d 101 of the experiment. Supplementing the growing–finishing pigs with the mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide numerically decreased the serum glycerol concentration and increased the serum ferritin level when comparing the pigs in group D to those in group A; in addition, feeding glycerin to the growing–finishing pigs also numerically increased the serum ferritin concentration when comparing the pigs in group B to those in group A.

3.2. Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality and Approximate Composition

Compared to the pigs in group A, supplementing the growing–finishing pigs with glycerin (group B), a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide (group C), or a mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide (group D) did not have a statistical influence (p > 0.05) on the carcass characteristics, marbling score, pH45min and meat color of the pork (a*), except for the value associated with meat redness (Table 3). The longissimus dorsi of the finishing pigs in group D had a higher (p < 0.05) redness (a*) value than that of the finishing pigs in the other groups, and the addition of vitamin C and niacinamide had an influence (p < 0.05) on the redness (a*) value. The addition of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide tended to increase the carcass length and back fat thickness when comparing the pigs in group D to those in the other groups.
The results in Table 4 show that the addition of glycerin, a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide, or a mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide did not have a statistical influence (p > 0.05) on the content of moisture, crude protein, ether extract and myoglobin in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle, but that glycerin and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide had an interaction effect (p < 0.05) on the crude protein content of the semimembranosus muscle. The finishing pigs in group D had a numerically higher myoglobin level in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus than the finishing pigs in the other groups. Supplementing the growing–finishing pigs with glycerin, a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide, or a mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide had different effects on the content of glycerol in the longissimus dorsi and semimembranosus; the finishing pigs in group B, group C and group D had a higher (p < 0.01) glycerol content in the longissimus dorsi than the finishing pigs in group A, but no statistical difference (p > 0.05) was found in the glycerol content of the longissimus dorsi among group B, group C and group D. In addition, the content of glycerol in the longissimus dorsi was affected by the glycerin (p < 0.05), the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide (p < 0.01), and the interaction effect of glycerin and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide (p < 0.01). The finishing pigs in group C had a higher (p < 0.05) glycerol content in the semimembranosus than the finishing pigs in group A, group B and group D, but there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) in the glycerol content of the semimembranosus in group A, group B and group D had, and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide had an influence (p < 0.05) on the content of glycerol in the semimembranosus. In addition, the semimembranosus muscle had a higher glycerol content than the longissimus dorsi muscle regardless of the treatment, with or without the supplementation of glycerin, vitamin C or niacinamide.

3.3. Composition and Characteristics of Myofibers

A higher (p < 0.01) percentage of type I myofibers, a lower (p < 0.01) percentage of type IIb myofibers, a smaller (p < 0.05) diameter and cross-sectional area of type IIb myofibers in the longissimus dorsi were observed when comparing the finishing pigs in group A to the finishing pigs in group B or group C (Table 5). There was no difference (p > 0.05) in the percentage, diameter, cross-sectional area and density of the myofibers in the longissimus dorsi when comparing the finishing pigs in group D to the finishing pigs in group A. The interaction effect between glycerin and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide had an influence on the percentage of myofibers (p < 0.01), the diameter of type IIb myofibers (p < 0.01), the cross-sectional area of type IIb myofibers (p < 0.01) and the density of type II myofibers (p < 0.05) in the longissimus dorsi.
The supplementation of the growing–finishing pigs with glycerin, a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide, or a mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide had no effect (p > 0.05) on the percentage of myofibers in the semimembranosus muscle when comparing the finishing pigs in group D to the finishing pigs in the other groups, but glycerin had an influence (p < 0.05) on the percentage of type I and IIb myofibers in the semimembranosus muscle. The addition of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide to the diets of the growing–finishing pigs tended to increase the percentage of type I and IIa myofibers, but tended to decrease the percentage of type IIb myofibers in the semimembranosus muscle. The addition of the vitamin C and niacinamide mixture increased (p < 0.05) the diameter and cross-sectional area of the myofibers in the semimembranosus when comparing the pigs in group C to the pigs in group A. The mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide had an effect (p < 0.05) on the diameter and cross-sectional area of the type I and IIa myofibers and the density of the type I myofibers in the semimembranosus.

3.4. Profiles of Amino Acids and Fatty Acids in Muscle

The amino acid profiles of muscle are shown in Table 6. The addition of glycerin, a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide, or a mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide to the diets of the growing–finishing pigs did not have a statistical effect (p > 0.05) on the level of amino acids in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle, but the addition of glycerin had an influence (p < 0.05) on the level of lysine, valine, phenylalanine, glutamate, aspartate, alanine, arginine, tyrosine and serine in the longissimus dorsi and on the level of glutamate, alanine, glycine and proline in the semimembranosus; in addition, the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide had an effect (p < 0.05) on the methionine concentration of the semimembranosus. The addition of glycerin to the diets of the growing–finishing pigs numerically increased the level of all amino acids in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle when comparing the pigs in group B to the pigs in group A, group C and group D. The finishing pigs in group B and group D had a numerically higher (p > 0.05) content of flavor amino acids (glutamate, aspartate, alanine, glycine) in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle than the finishing pigs in group A.
Supplementing the growing–finishing pigs with glycerin, a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide, a or mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide had no statistical effect (p > 0.05) on the concentration of fatty acids in the longissimus dorsi and semimembranosus, except for C14:1n5 (myristoleic acid) and C22:1n9 (erucic acid) (Table 7); in addition, the finishing pigs in group D had a higher (p < 0.01) level of C14:1n5 in the longissimus dorsi than the finishing pigs in group A, but a lower (p < 0.05) level of C22:1n9 in the semimembranosus than the finishing pigs in group B. The addition of glycerin had an influence on the concentration of C14:1n5 (p < 0.01), C21:0 (p < 0.05) and C22:1n9 (p < 0.01) in the longissimus dorsi, and on the level of C22:1n9 (p < 0.01) in the semimembranosus. Glycerin and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide had an interaction effect on the level of C10:0 (p < 0.05), C12:0 (p < 0.05) and C14:1n5 (p < 0.01) in the longissimus dorsi, and on the level of C22:1n9 (p < 0.01) in the semimembranosus muscle. The finishing pigs in group D had a numerically higher content of C10:0, C12:0, C14:0, C14:1n5, C15:0, C16:0, C16:1n7, C17:0, C18:0, C18:1n9c, C18:2n6c, C18:3n3, C20:0, C20:1 and C20:2 in the longissimus dorsi, and a numerically higher content of C14:1n5, C16:1n7 and C22:6n3 in the semimembranosus than the finishing pigs in the other groups, respectively. The finishing pigs in group D had a higher (p > 0.05) level of essential fatty acids (linoleic acid, linolenic acid and arachidic acid) in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle than the finishing pigs in group A.

4. Discussion

The muscle color of finishing crossbred pigs is an important factor that influences the purchasing intent of consumers; this is because it is usually used to evaluate meat freshness [29,30], and generally consumers prefer meat with a pink color rather than a pale-white color.
Previous studies found that the addition of glycerin has different influences on meat color, with crude glycerin feeding statistically decreasing the value of redness (a*) in the breast meat of Betong chicks [31] and in the longissimus dorsi of pigs [32], but statistically increasing the value of redness (a*) in beef [33]. In addition, the results of many other studies have also indicated that a diet with less than 2-% glycerin has no statistical influence on the redness (a*) value of pork [34,35], and only numerically increases the value of lightness, redness and yellowness in the meat of crossbred Boer goats [36]. Our study demonstrated that the addition of glycerin to the diet of pigs at 10% did not statistically increase the value of redness (a*) in pork, with growing–finishing pigs offered food-grade glycerin at 10% of the diet having a numerically lower redness (a*) value in the longissimus dorsi than pigs not offered food-grade glycerin in the diet; this is similar to previous reports [31,32]. However, the supplementation of vitamin C and niacinamide instead of glycerin numerically increased the value of redness (a*) in the longissimus dorsi; in addition, the growing–finishing pigs supplemented with glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide simultaneously achieved a statistically higher value of redness (a*) in the longissimus dorsi than the pigs in the other groups. This result can be attributed to the highest content of OxyMb being present in the longissimus dorsi of group D. Myoglobin is the main pigment in muscle tissue, and it is classified into DeoMb (purple red), OxyMb (bright red) and MetMb (brown); the value of muscle redness (a*) depends on the amount and chemical state of myoglobin and the fatty acid composition of the myocyte membrane [8,26]. No statistical difference was observed in the myoglobin content among the four treatment groups, but group D had a statistically higher value of redness (a*) in the longissimus dorsi muscle than the other groups; this result might be attributed to the different chemical states of myoglobin. For the pigs in group D supplemented with vitamin C, niacinamide and glycerin, as well as those supplemented with vitamin C and niacinamide, antioxidant effects were observed. Meanwhile, glycerol has moisturizing effects and is able to reduce glycolysis; therefore, the content of oxygenated myoglobin in the longissimus dorsi of the pigs in group D should have been the highest. It has been reported that goats or ducks supplemented with vitamin C have a statistically higher redness (a*) than those not offered vitamin C [37,38]; this improvement in the redness value may be due to the ability of vitamin C to scavenge free radicals, inactivate reactive oxygen species, or improve the lipid stability by limiting the activities of reactive oxygen species [39].
Myofiber types also can influence the redness (a*) value of muscle [40,41]; these myofibers can be divided into oxidative types, including type I and IIa, which are red and rich in mitochondria, and into lipids, myoglobin and glycolytic type Iib, which are white and possess fewer mitochondria, lipids and myoglobin [42,43]. The supplementation of the diet of obese Zucker rats or growing pigs with niacin at 750 mg/kg induced type II myofiber to switch to type I muscle fiber, increasing the percentage of type I myofibers in the muscle [44,45]. Our study indicated that the percentage of type I and Iia myofibers in group C was lower than that in group A and B, respectively, but that the value of redness in the longissimus dorsi of group C was numerically higher than that in group A and B; this might be due to the increased reductase activity of metmyoglobin in the muscle after supplementation with nicotinamide, which resulted in more metmyoglobin being converted into oxymyoglobin [25,26]. Regarding the effect of glycerin, vitamin C or niacinamide on the development of myofibers, only a few previous studies have reported that treating the extensor carpi radialis longus and soleus muscles of rats with glycerin enlarges the cross-sectional area of fibers and increases the number of muscle fibers [46]; in another study, supplementing channel catfish with vitamin C at 50 mg/kg body weight increased the density and diameter of their myofibers [47], and the addition of vitamin C (250 mg/kg/day) and E (360 mg/kg) to rats statistically increased the cross-sectional area of the soleus and tibialis anterior compared to rats not treated with vitamin C and E [48]. In addition, an increase in the cross-sectional area and diameter of myofibers was observed in mice supplemented with nicotinamide or treated with nicotinamide N-methyltransferase [49,50]. At present, no studies addressing the influence of glycerin, vitamin C or niacinamide on the myofibers of pigs have been conducted, but our study indicated that growing–finishing pigs supplemented with glycerin or with a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide had a larger diameter and cross-sectional area of myofibers than growing–finishing pigs not supplemented with glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide; however, the underlying mechanism was not explored.
The fatty acids present in meat are important precursors of flavor compounds [51], and the majority of aromatic materials in meat are derived from lipids; in addition, the flavor characteristics of meat are strongly affected by the quantity of unsaturated fatty acids [52]. Previous studies have shown that the inclusion of glycerin in the diet of crossbred bulls statistically decreases the total saturated fatty acids and increases the content of MUFA and PUFA [20]; in addition, it has been found that the content of capric, lauric, myristic, palmitic, stearic and palmitoleic linearly decreases, but the content of pentadecanoic, heptadecanoic, transvaccenic, oleic, linolenic fatty acids, MUFA and PUFA increases when crude glycerin is included in the diet of lambs [53]. Pork presents with a predominance of oleic, palmitic, linoleic, stearic and arachidonic acid [54]. In their study, Faria et al. reported that the addition of crude glycerin at 5, 10, 15 and 20% to the diets of growing–finishing pigs did not statistically increase the content of fatty acids in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus [55]; our study also did not find statistical differences in the fatty acid profile of the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle among the four groups, except for myristoleic and erucic acid. However, a higher concentration of myristoleic acid, erucic acid and essential fatty acids (linoleic acid and linolenic acid) was achieved in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle of pigs supplemented simultaneously with glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide, and in the semimembranosus muscle of pigs supplemented singly with glycerin; this is compared to that of pigs not supplemented with glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide. The consumption of meat with high concentrations of myristoleic acid and essential fatty acids (linoleic and linolenic) is seen to be highly beneficial to human health; this is because reports have indicated that myristoleic acid can reduce adiposity [56], improve hyperglycemia [57] and alleviate inflammation [58]. Interestingly, our results indicated that supplementing the diet of pigs with glycerin alongside a rapeseed meal statistically increased the accumulation of erucic acid in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle, but that the singular addition of vitamin C and niacinamide did not present this accumulative effect. To date, the possible mechanism of action implicated in the accumulation of erucic acid in muscle with the addition of glycerin remains unclear. Erucic acid is a controversial fatty acid, as excessive erucic acid may generate the risk of intrauterine growth retardation [59], as well as induce hepatic steatosis and myocardial lipidosis [60]; however, other studies have found that erucic acid has antiviral, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative functions [61,62], and can act as a neuroprotective, anti-tumor and myelin protective agent [63].
No statistical difference was observed in the redness (a*) value of the longissimus dorsi between group B and group C, but the redness value of the longissimus dorsi in group D was statistically higher than that in group B and group C; this might be attributed to the significant interaction effect between glycerin and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide. In addition, the statistically significant increase in the percentage of type I myofibers and myristoleic acid content of the longissimus dorsi of pigs supplemented with a mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide may also be ascribed to the interaction between glycerin and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide. This is because the statistical results indicated that this interaction had a statistically significant impact on the percentage of type I myofibers and the myristoleic acid content. However, no results regarding the effect of the interaction between glycerin and the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide on the redness (a*) value, percentage of type I myofibers and myristoleic acid content of meat were found to support our hypothesis.
In this study, we investigated the effect of supplementing the diet of pigs with glycerin and/or a mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide on pork quality, although the preliminary results indicated that supplementing the diet of growing–finishing pigs with glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide together during a 103-day feeding experiment statistically increased the redness (a*) value, the percentage of type I myofibers and the myristoleic acid content of the longissimus dorsi. However, the limited size of the pigs slaughtered might have affected the generalizability of this work; for this reason, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to verify the findings of this study.

5. Conclusions

Compared to the diet of growing–finishing crossbred pigs without the supplementation of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide, the diet supplemented with a mixture of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide significantly increased the redness (a*) value, glycerol and myristoleic acid content of the longissimus dorsi; tended to increase the level of flavor amino acids, linoleic acid, linolenic acid and erucic acid; and increased the percentage and density of type I myofibers in the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle. Vitamin C and niacinamide had a significant interaction effect on the redness value of the longissimus dorsi, and the glycerol content of the longissimus dorsi was significantly affected by glycerin, the mixture of vitamin C and niacinamide, and the interaction of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide. Glycerin had a significant influence on the erucic acid content of the longissimus dorsi and the semimembranosus muscle. The underlying mechanism of action implicated in the increased value of redness (a*) and content of glycerol and myristoleic acid of the longissimus dorsi via the addition of glycerin, vitamin C and niacinamide should be further explored. In addition, the findings of this study will contribute to the production of high-quality pork that satisfies consumers’ purchase desires.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H. and W.L.; experiments, L.D., S.H., W.Z., P.W., W.S. and H.W.; data analysis, L.D., S.H. and H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D. and S.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.H. and W.L.; project administration, Y.H.; funding acquisition, W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Jiangxi Modern Agricultural Research Collaborative Innovation Project (JXXTCX2016003-02).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangxi Agricultural University (JXAULL-202215).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Poklukar, K.; Candek-Potokar, M.; Batorek Lukac, N.; Tomazin, U.; Skrlep, M. Lipid deposition and metabolism in local and modern pig breeds: A review. Animals 2020, 10, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lomiwes, D.; Farouk, M.M.; Wiklund, E.; Young, O.A. Small heat shock proteins and their role in meat tenderness: A review. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Frank, D.; Joo, S.T.; Warner, R. Consumer acceptability of intramuscular fat. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Adebo, O.A. African sorghum-based fermented foods: Past, current and future prospects. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sardi, L.; Gastaldo, A.; Borciani, M.; Bertolini, A.; Musi, V.; Martelli, G.; Cavallini, D.; Rubini, G.; Nannoni, E. Identification of possible pre-slaughter indicators to predict stress and meat quality: A study on heavy pigs. Animals 2020, 10, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sardi, L.; Gastaldo, A.; Borciani, M.; Bertolini, A.; Musi, V.; Garavaldi, A.; Martelli, G.; Cavallini, D.; Nannoni, E. Pre-slaughter sources of fresh meat quality variation: The case of heavy pigs intended for protected designation of origin products. Animals 2020, 10, 2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Suman, S.P.; Joseph, P. Myoglobin chemistry and meat color. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 4, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Papuc, C.; Goran, G.V.; Predescu, C.N.; Nicorescu, V.; Stefan, G. Plant polyphenols as antioxidant and antibacterial agents for shelflife extension of meat and meat products: Classification, structures, sources, and action mechanisms. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 1243–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wen, W.; Chen, X.; Huang, Z.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Luo, Y.; Yan, H.; Chen, H.; Zheng, P.; et al. Dietary lycopene supplementation improves meat quality, antioxidant capacity and skeletal muscle fiber type transformation in finishing pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2022, 8, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhong, Y.; Yan, Z.; Song, B.; Zheng, C.; Duan, Y.; Kong, X.; Deng, J.; Li, F. Dietary supplementation with betaine or glycine improves the carcass trait, meat quality and lipid metabolism of finishing mini-pigs. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nannoni, E.; Martelli, G.; Scozzoli, M.; Belperio, S.; Buonaiuto, G.; Vannetti, N.I.; Truzzi, E.; Rossi, E.; Benvenuti, S.; Sardi, L. Effects of lavender essential oil inhalation on the welfare and meat quality of fattening heavy pigs intended for parma ham production. Animals 2023, 13, 2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vinassa, M.; Cavallini, D.; Galaverna, D.; Baragli, P.; Raspa, F.; Nery, J.; Valle, E. Palatability assessment in horses in relation to lateralization and temperament. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020, 232, 105110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gomide, A.P.C.; Brustolini, P.C.; Ferreira, A.S.; Paulino, P.V.R.; Lima, A.L.; Scottá, B.A.; Rodrigues, V.V.; Câmara, L.R.A.; Moita, A.M.S.; Oliveira Júnior, G.M.; et al. Substitution of corn for crude glycerin in diets for finishing pigs. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2012, 64, 1309–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Semkiv, M.V.; Ruchala, J.; Dmytruk, K.V.; Sibirny, A.A. 100 years later, what is new in glycerol bioproduction? Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Volpi-Lagreca, G.; Duckett, S.K. Supplementation of glycerol or fructose via drinking water to enhance marbling deposition and meat quality of finishing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 858–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mendoza, O.F.; Elis, M.; Mckeith, F.K.; Gaines, A.M. Metabolizable energy content of refined glycerin and its effects on growth performance and carcass and pork quality characteristics of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 3887–3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Carvalho, V.B.; Leite, R.F.; Almeida, M.; Paschoaloto, J.R.; Carvalho, E.B.; Lanna, D.; Perez, H.L.; Van Cleef, E.; Homem Junior, A.C.; Ezequiel, J.M.B. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs fed high concentrations of crude glycerin in low-starch diets. Meat Sci. 2015, 110, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Almeida, M.T.C.; Ezequiel, J.M.B.; Paschoaloto, J.R.; Perez, H.L.; Carvalho, V.B.; Castro Filho, E.S.; van Cleef, E.H.C.B. Effects of high concentrations of crude glycerin in diets for feedlot lambs: Feeding behaviour, growth performance, carcass and non-carcass traits. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017, 58, 1271–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Edwards, H.D.; Anderson, R.C.; Miller, R.K.; Taylor, T.M.; Hardin, M.D.; Smith, S.B.; Krueger, N.A.; Nisbet, D.J. Glycerol inhibition of ruminal lipolysis in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 5176–5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eiras, C.E.; Marques Jde, A.; Prado, R.M.; Valero, M.V.; Bonafé, E.G.; Zawadzki, F.; Perotto, D.; Prado, I.N. Glycerine levels in the diets of crossbred bulls finished in feedlot: Carcass characteristics and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Castagnino, P.S.; Fiorentini, G.; Dallantonia, E.E.; Vito, E.S.; Messana, J.D.; Torrecilhas, J.A.; Silva Sobrinho, A.G.; Berchielli, T.T. Fatty acid profile and carcass traits of feedlot Nellore cattle fed crude glycerin and virginiamycin. Meat Sci. 2018, 140, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mandl, J.; Szarka, A.; Bánhegyi, G. Vitamin C: Update on physiology and pharmacology. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 157, 1097–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pogge, D.J.; Lonergan, S.M.; Hansen, S.L. Influence of supplementing vitamin C to yearling steers fed a high sulfur diet during the finishing period on meat color, tenderness and protein degradation, and fatty acid profile of the longissimus muscle. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gebert, S.; Eichenberger, B.; Pfirter, H.P.; Wenk, C. Influence of different dietary vitamin C levels on vitamin E and C content and oxidative stability in various tissues and stored m. longissimus dorsi of growing pigs. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bekhit, A.E.; Faustman, C. Metmyoglobin reducing activity. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 407–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Djimsa, B.A.; Abraham, A.; Mafi, G.G.; VanOverbeke, D.L.; Ramanathan, R. Effects of metmyoglobin reducing activity and thermal stability of NADH-dependent reductase and lactate dehydrogenase on premature browning in ground beef. J. Food Sci. 2017, 82, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Suga, T.; Kimura, E.; Morioka, Y.; Ikawa, M.; Li, S.; Uchino, K.; Uchida, Y.; Yamashita, S.; Maeda, Y.; Chamberlain, J.S.; et al. Muscle fiber type-predominant promoter activity in lentiviral-mediated transgenic mouse. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Raspa, F.; Tarantola, M.; Muca, E.; Bergero, D.; Soglia, D.; Cavallini, D.; Vervuert, I.; Bordin, C.; De Palo, P.; Valle, E. Does feeding management make a difference to behavioural activities and welfare of horses reared for meat production? Animals 2022, 12, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khliji, S.; van de Ven, R.; Lamb, T.A.; Lanza, M.; Hopkins, D.L. Relationship between consumer ranking of lamb colour and objective measures of colour. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, H.; Yuan, L.; Li, W.; Lin, L. Antioxidant property of SiO2-eugenol liposome loaded nanofibrous membranes on beef. Food Packag. Shelf 2017, 11, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sopian, Y.; Wattanachant, C.; Wattanasit, S. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of Betong chicken fed with diets supplemented with crude glycerin. J. Poult. Sci. 2020, 57, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Egea, M.; Linares, M.B.; Garrido, M.D.; Madrid, J.; Hernández, F. Feeding Iberian × Duroc cross pigs with crude glycerine: Effects of diet and gender on carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2016, 111, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Carvalho, J.R.R.; Chizzotti, M.L.; Ramos, E.M.; Machado Neto, O.R.; Lanna, D.P.D.; Lopes, L.S.; Teixeira, P.D.; Ladeira, M.M. Qualitative characteristics of meat from young bulls fed different levels of crude glycerin. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Della Casa, G.; Bochicchio, D.; Faeti, V.; Marchetto, G.; Poletti, E.; Rossi, A.; Garavaldi, A.; Panciroli, A.; Brogna, N. Use of pure glycerol in fattening heavy pigs. Meat Sci. 2009, 81, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schieck, S.J.; Shurson, G.C.; Kerr, B.J.; Johnston, L.J. Evaluation of glycerol, a biodiesel coproduct, in grow-finish pig diets to support growth and pork quality. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 3927–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bezerra, H.F.C.; Santos, E.M.; de Carvalho, G.G.P.; de Oliveira, J.S.; de Moura Zanine, A.; Pinho, R.M.A.; de Araújo, M.L.G.M.L.; Perazzo, A.F.; de Jesus Ferreira, D. Effect of crude glycerin levels on meat quality and carcass characteristics of crossbred Boer goats. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 2312–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Akinmoladun, O.F.; Fon, F.N.; Mpendulo, C.T. Stress indicators, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Xhosa goats subjected to different watering regimen and vitamin C supplementation. Livest. Sci. 2020, 238, 104083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tugiyanti, E.; Yuwanta, T.; Zuprizal, Z.; Rusman, R.; Ismoyowati, I. Supplementation of vitamin E and C in feed on color, cooking loss and tenderness of Muscovy duck meat stored in room temperature, refrigerator and freezer. Anim. Prod. 2015, 17, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Harris, S.E.; Huff-Lonergan, E.; Lonergan, S.M.; Jones, W.R.; Rankins, D. Antioxidant status affects color stability and tenderness of calcium chloride-injected beef. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, M.; Li, Z.M.; Chen, W.D.; Rong, T.; Wang, G.; Li, J.H.; Ma, X.Y. Use of Hermetia illucens larvae as a dietary protein source: Effects on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in finishing pigs. Meat Sci. 2019, 158, 107837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.H.; Liu, Y.Y.; Li, F.N.; Lin, Q.; Dai, Q.Z.; Sun, J.B.; Huang, X.G.; Chen, X.A.; Yin, Y.L. Effects of dietary ramie powder at various levels on carcass traits and meat quality in finishing pigs. Meat Sci. 2018, 143, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, Y.; Ming Zhang, M.; Shan, Y.J.; Ji, G.G.; Ju, X.J.; Tu, Y.J.; Sheng, Z.W.; Xie, J.F.; Zou, J.M.; Shu, J.T. miRNA-mRNA network regulation in the skeletal muscle fber phenotype of chickens revealed by integrated analysis of miRNAome and transcriptome. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Molinari, S.; Imbriano, C.; Moresi, V.; Renzini, A.; Belluti, S.; Lozanoska-Ochser, B.; Gigli, G.; Cedola, A. Histone deacetylase functions and therapeutic implications for adult skeletal muscle metabolism. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1130183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ringseis, R.; Rosenbaum, S.; Gessner, D.K.; Herges, L.; Kubens, J.F.; Mooren, F.C.; Krüger, K.; Eder, K. Supplementing obese Zucker rats with niacin induces the transition of glycolytic to oxidative skeletal muscle fibers. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khan, M.; Ringseis, R.; Mooren, F.C.; Krüger, K.; Most, E.; Eder, K. Niacin supplementation increases the number of oxidative type I fibers in skeletal muscle of growing pigs. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chiakulas, J.J.; Pauly, J.E. A study of postnatal growth of skeletal muscle in the rat. Anat. Rec. 1965, 152, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xiao, K.; Wang, X.; Dai, Y.J.; Huang, Y.Y.; Wang, M.M.; Guo, H.X.; Liu, W.B.; Li, X.F.; Abasubong, K.P.; Jiang, G.Z. Hypoxia mediates Hif-1α to affect myofiber development and Vc regulates the influence by activating Shh-Gli pathway in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Aquaculture 2023, 562, 738849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dutra, M.T.; Girgis, B.; Bovolini, A.; Duarte, J.A. Fast-twitch muscle fibers hypertrophy is hampered by antioxidant supplementation during atrophy rehabilitation in rats. J. Musculoskelet. Res. 2022, 25, 2250011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guo, S.Z.; Chen, Q.Y.; Sun, Y.Y.; Chen, J.W. Nicotinamide protects against skeletal muscle atrophy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 125, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Neelakantan, H.; Brightwell, C.R.; Graber, T.G.; Maroto, R.; Wang, H.Y.L.; McHardy, S.F.; Papaconstantinou, J.; Fry, C.S.; Watowich, S.J. Small molecule nicotinamide N-methyltransferase inhibitor activates senescent muscle stem cells and improves regenerative capacity of aged skeletal muscle. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 163, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, L.J.; Wu, H.; Li, J.T.; Wang, Z.Y.; Zhang, L.Y. Determination of fatty acids in broiler breast meat by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wu, Q.; Liu, T.; Liu, H.; Zheng, G.C. Unsaturated fatty acid: Metabolism, synthesis and gene regulation. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 1782–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. da Costa, C.A.; de Andrade, G.P.; Maciel, M.D.V.; de Lima, D.M.; Cardoso, D.B.; Lopes, L.A.; da Silva, G.G.; Guim, A.; de Carvalho, F.F.R. Meat quality of lambs fed crude glycerin as a replacement for corn. Small Ruminant Res. 2020, 192, 106245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Teye, G.A.; Sheard, P.R.; Whittington, F.M.; Nute, G.R.; Stewart, A.; Wood, J.D. Influence of dietary oils and protein level on pork quality. 1. Effects on muscle fatty acid composition, carcass, meat and eating quality. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Faria, P.B.; Cantarelli, V.S.; Fialho, E.T.; Pinto, A.M.B.G.; Faria, J.H.; Rocha, M.F.M.; Guerreiro, M.C.; Bressan, M.C. Lipid profile and cholesterol of pork with the use of glycerin in feeding. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2015, 67, 535–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Quan, L.H.; Zhang, C.H.; Dong, M.; Jiang, J.; Xu, H.D.; Yan, C.L.; Liu, X.M.; Zhou, H.Q.; Zhang, H.L.; Chen, L.; et al. Myristoleic acid produced by enterococci reduces obesity through brown adipose tissue activation. Gut 2020, 69, 1239–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Takato, T.; Iwata, K.; Murakami, C.; Wada, Y.; Sakane, F. Chronic administration of myristic acid improves hyperglycaemia in the nagoya- Shibata- Yasuda mouse model of congenital type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 2076–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lee, J.; Costa-Dookhan, K.; Panganiban, K.; MacKenzie, N.; Treen, Q.C.; Chintoh, A.; Remington, G.; Müller, D.J.; Sockalingam, S.; Gerretsen, P.; et al. Metabolomic signatures associated with weight gain and psychosis spectrum diagnoses: A pilot study. Front. Psychiatry 2023, 14, 1169787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cinelli, G.; Fabrizi, M.; Ravà, L.; Signore, F.; Vernocchi, P.; Semeraro, M.; Vallone, C.; Lanciotti, R.; Ciofi Degli Atti, M.; Manco, M. Association between maternal and foetal erythrocyte fatty acid profiles and birth weight. Nutrients 2018, 10, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kumar, J.B.S.; Sharma, B. A review on neuropharmacological role of erucic acid: An omega-9 fatty acid from edible oils. Nutr. Neurosci. 2022, 25, 1041–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liang, X.L.; Huang, Y.; Pan, X.P.; Hao, Y.B.; Chen, X.W.; Jiang, H.M.; Li, J.; Zhou, B.X.; Yang, Z.F. Erucic acid from Isatis indigotica Fort. suppresses influenza A virus replication and inflammation in vitro and in vivo through modulation of NF-k B and p38 MAPK pathway. J. Pharm. Anal. 2020, 10, 130–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Altinoz, M.A.; Elmaci, I.; Hacimuftuoglu, A.; Ozpinar, A.; Hacker, E.; Ozpinar, A. PPARδ and its ligand erucic acid may act anti-tumoral, neuroprotective, and myelin protective in neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, and Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Asp. Med. 2021, 78, 100871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Altinoz, M.A.; Ozpinar, A. PPAR-δ and erucic acid in multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer’s disease. Likely benefits in terms of immunity and metabolism. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 69, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Diet composition and nutrient level (%, on dry matter basis).
Table 1. Diet composition and nutrient level (%, on dry matter basis).
Group AGroup BGroup CGroup D
10–60 kg60–120 kg10–60 kg60–120 kg10–60 kg60–120 kg10–60 kg60–120 kg
Ingredients
Corn59.0064.0048.0052.0058.8963.8947.8951.89
Wheat bran16.0016.0015.0015.0016.0016.0015.0015.00
Glycerin0.000.0010.0010.000.000.0010.0010.00
Soybean meal14.0010.0015.0011.0014.0010.0015.0011.00
Fishmeal2.000.002.000.002.000.002.000.00
Rapeseed meal5.006.006.008.005.006.006.008.00
4% Premix (1)4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00
Vitamin C0.000.000.000.000.060.060.060.06
Niacinamide0.000.000.000.000.050.050.050.05
Total100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00
Nutrient levels (2)
ME (MJ/kg)12.1512.2412.2612.3112.1512.2412.2612.31
Crude protein17.3015.1017.3415.1817.2215.0517.3615.21
Crude fiber3.843.683.693.783.743.713.473.63
Ether extract3.813.683.433.503.943.883.573.65
Calcium0.790.650.820.700.730.690.780.63
Total phosphorus0.670.540.630.550.690.590.660.60
Lysine1.090.841.090.861.090.841.090.86
Methionine + Cystine0.570.440.560.430.570.440.560.43
Note: (1) The premix provided the following per kg of the diet in the 10 to 60 kg stage: VA, 2750 IU; VD3, 500 IU; VE, 11 IU; VK3, 0.50 mg; VB1, 0.55 mg; VB2, 1.55 mg; VB6, 0.80 mg; VB12, 10 µg; Niacotinic acid, 7.5 mg; pantothenic acid, 6.5 mg; biotin, 0.08 mg; Cu (CuSO4·5H2O), 5 mg; Zn (ZnSO4·1H2O), 17.5 mg; Mn (MnSO4·1H2O), 5 mg; Fe (FeSO4·1H2O), 21.3 mg; Se (Na2SeO3), 0.07 mg; I (KI), 0.08 mg; Co(CoCl2·1H2O), 0.06 mg; Lysine, 90 g; Methionine, 71 g. The premix provided the following per kg of the diet in the 60 to 90 kg stage: lys, 90 g; VA, 1600 IU; VD3, 300 IU; VE, 11 IU; VK3, 0.50 mg; VB1, 0.48 mg; VB2 1.10, mg; VB6, 0.65 mg; VB12, 9 µg; Niacotinic acid, 6.5 mg; pantothenic acid, 6.0 mg; biotin, 0.06 mg; Cu (CuSO4·5H2O), 5 mg; Zn (ZnSO4·1H2O), 13.5 mg; Mn (MnSO4·1H2O), 5 mg; Fe (FeSO4·1H2O), 17.0 mg; Se (Na2SeO3), 0.07 mg; I (KI), 0.08 mg; Co(CoCl2·1H2O), 0.06 mg; lysine, 69 g; methionine, 49 g. (2) Metabolizable energy (ME), lysine, methionine and cystine are calculated values. Crude protein, crude fiber, ether extract, calcium and total phosphorus are measured values.
Table 2. Comparison of serum chemical parameters.
Table 2. Comparison of serum chemical parameters.
Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DSEMp-Value
GLYVC + NMGLY × (VC + NM)
Serum of pigs sampled at day 50 of the experiment
TC (mmol/L)1.731.881.621.620.130.5900.2080.587
TG (mmol/L)0.280.300.270.220.030.6150.1810.218
HDL (mmol/L)0.700.650.590.610.050.8010.1840.468
LDL (mmol/L)0.901.020.880.800.090.7940.2290.320
vLDL (mmol/L)0.480.540.490.350.050.4170.0670.060
NEFA (mmol/L)0.070.060.050.070.010.5350.7130.207
GLU (mmol/L)4.324.464.583.580.280.1620.3040.074
GL (umol/L)3.583.744.172.370.390.0670.3390.036
TF (g/L)2.822.732.882.570.190.3140.7930.567
FER (ng/mL)90.90103.8789.6298.2310.010.3120.7390.833
Serum of pigs sampled at day 101 of the experiment
TC (mmol/L)1.881.671.821.790.220.5980.9000.718
TG (mmol/L)0.350.280.360.320.020.0420.3020.469
HDL (mmol/L)0.620.550.620.580.100.6160.8610.888
LDL (mmol/L)1.020.971.030.980.140.7420.9710.994
vLDL (mmol/L)0.550.490.550.540.070.6350.7480.705
NEFA (mmol/L)0.080.080.370.550.240.7000.1460.704
GLU (mmol/L)4.585.365.424.530.660.9380.9910.241
GL (umol/L)5.495.404.563.500.490.2750.0210.357
TF (g/L)2.612.822.632.640.230.6300.7220.661
FER (ng/mL)93.60110.1094.8295.526.040.1930.3010.227
Note: TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; vLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acid; GLU, glucose; GL, glycerol; TF, transferrin; FER, ferritin; GLY, glycerin; VC, vitamin C; NM, niacinamide. Means within a row followed by no or the same letters do not differ significantly (p > 0.05). p-value means the effect of GLY, (VC + NM), or the interaction of GLY and (VC + NM) on the parameter within the same row.
Table 3. Carcass characteristics, marbling score, pH and meat color.
Table 3. Carcass characteristics, marbling score, pH and meat color.
Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DSEMp-Value
GLYVC + NMGLY × (VC + NM)
Carcass characteristics
Carcass weight (kg)38.5039.2837.0038.672.110.5780.6300.839
Carcass length (cm)75.6775.3372.0079.332.310.1680.9440.136
Backfat thickness (cm)12.0013.3513.2114.033.150.7380.7720.934
Loin muscle area (mm2)4014.114232.073669.584040.00306.290.3650.4070.810
Longissimus dorsi
Marbling score2.002.001.832.000.530.8780.8780.878
pH45 min6.236.336.086.280.180.4520.5950.786
L* (lightness)42.1742.6642.8042.301.760.9970.9400.786
a* (redness)1.86 b1.22 b2.94 b4.79 a0.620.3520.0110.090
b* (yellowness)9.489.789.939.860.500.8200.6160.721
Means within a row followed by different lowercase letters differ significantly (p < 0.05). p-value means the effect of GLY, (VC + NM) or the interaction of GLY and (VC + NM) on the parameter within the same row.
Table 4. Comparison of proximate composition (%, as fresh basis).
Table 4. Comparison of proximate composition (%, as fresh basis).
Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DSEMp-Value
GLYVC + NMGLY × (VC + NM)
Longissimus dorsi
Moisture72.2873.2073.6273.350.660.6330.2910.389
Crude protein20.2720.6020.1619.780.270.9290.1200.218
Ether extract4.884.304.164.810.620.9540.8620.354
Myoglobin (ng/mL)9.238.638.279.270.520.7060.7630.163
Glycerol (µmol/g)2.84 B4.23 A4.48 A4.56 A0.230.0130.0030.022
Semimembranosus
Moisture72.9172.8472.8072.500.350.6060.5290.750
Crude protein19.9619.3119.6520.190.220.7910.2310.028
Ether extract5.435.695.435.530.410.6740.8510.844
Myoglobin (ng/mL)7.908.278.278.500.880.7390.7450.936
Glycerol (μmol/g)5.39 b5.32 b7.53 a5.46 b0.470.0510.0400.064
Means within a row followed by different lowercase letters differ significantly (p < 0.05) and those followed by different uppercase letters differ significantly (p < 0.01). p-value means the effect of GLY, (VC + NM), or the interaction of GLY and (VC + NM) on the parameter within the same row.
Table 5. A comparison of the different types of myofibers among the different groups.
Table 5. A comparison of the different types of myofibers among the different groups.
Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DSEMp-Value
GLYVC + NMGLY × (VC + NM)
Longissimus dorsi
Percentage
(%)		Type I 18.77 AB14.17 BC12.09 C20.91 A1.460.1850.9840.002
Type II a33.46 a26.05 b27.05 b29.52 ab1.450.1260.3400.009
Type II b47.78 B59.78 A60.86 A49.57 B2.370.8840.5600.001
Diameter
(μm)		Type I 44.9051.9148.7045.403.730.6330.7260.204
Type II a53.4361.0164.0147.715.710.4670.8170.070
Type II b73.91 b106.64 a111.39 a72.09 b9.630.7410.8830.006
Cross-sectional area (μm2)Type I 2062.672697.152395.672084.38339.920.6470.6910.202
Type II a2848.923812.714195.702312.01681.080.5190.9130.070
Type II b5661.33 bc11,508.86 ab12,704.35 a5322.78 c1805.550.6820.8180.006
Density
(number/μm2)		Type I 37.2953.7450.4828.099.320.7580.5220.071
Type II a87.21155.28141.1772.5723.830.9910.5630.021
Type II b117.34208.94189.9597.6532.070.9910.5630.021
Total241.84417.96381.60198.3065.050.9570.5560.025
Semimembranosus
Percentage
(%)		Type I 17.9622.9418.0024.652.480.0470.7330.744
Type II a29.1530.2228.1632.191.230.0710.7010.264
Type II b52.8946.8453.8443.163.520.0450.7080.529
Diameter
(μm)		Type I 43.86 b51.19 ab64.76 a57.16 ab4.020.9740.0100.100
Type II a51.41 b52.27 b73.20 a58.65 ab4.880.1980.0200.153
Type II b81.6875.94117.4278.879.990.0580.0890.139
Cross-sectional area
(μm2)		Type I 1987.81 b2775.58 b4590.26 a3453.98 ab509.640.7410.0120.096
Type II a2709.25 b2765.22 b5451.16 a3457.57 ab624.850.1600.0250.140
Type II b7078.73 b5890.88 b14,012.35 a6276.35 b1860.850.0430.0850.117
Density
(number/μm2)		Type I 39.2635.2370.6644.248.490.1110.0450.224
Type II a104.4489.71190.95104.7623.680.0660.0640.170
Type II b140.53120.72256.94140.9631.870.0660.0640.170
Total284.23245.66518.55289.9563.900.0700.0610.175
Means within a row followed by different lowercase letters differ significantly (p < 0.05), and those followed by different uppercase letters differ significantly (p < 0.01). p-value means the effect of GLY, (VC + NM), or the interaction of GLY and (VC + NM) on the parameter within the same row.
Table 6. Amino acid composition of muscle (g/100 g, on fresh basis).
Table 6. Amino acid composition of muscle (g/100 g, on fresh basis).
Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DSEMp-Value
GLYVC + NMGLY × (VC + NM)
Longissimus dorsi
Essential amino acids (EAAs)
Lysine1.942.081.962.030.030.0140.7080.317
Methionine0.420.470.430.420.030.4000.4630.293
Valine1.101.161.101.130.020.0370.3370.428
Leucine1.731.821.751.790.030.0860.8840.419
Isoleucine1.031.071.031.040.030.4610.6200.620
Phenylalanine0.860.920.870.900.020.0220.6760.411
Histidine1.041.031.021.000.020.5850.2040.695
Threonine0.951.010.950.970.020.0510.2460.328
Non-essential amino acids (NEAAs)
Glutamate3.203.433.213.330.070.0320.5320.447
Aspartate2.022.152.062.110.030.0191.0000.283
Alanine1.221.301.231.250.020.0400.4060.198
Arginine1.321.421.341.380.030.0220.8030.234
Glycine0.890.950.920.900.020.3610.6160.125
Tyrosine0.710.770.720.740.020.0360.6000.264
Serine0.800.850.810.830.010.0310.7190.411
Proline0.630.660.620.610.010.6080.0650.147
FAAs 18.919.529.019.250.1540.0260.5820.256
Total EAAs9.079.579.119.280.150.0610.4280.313
Total NEAAs10.8011.5310.9211.170.180.0270.5300.226
TAAs19.8721.1020.0320.450.330.0360.4730.253
Semimembranosus
Essential amino acids (EAAs)
Lysine1.942.011.811.940.060.1130.1130.663
Methionine0.390.410.290.340.030.2130.0180.636
Valine1.091.111.021.090.030.0990.0990.363
Leucine1.741.791.621.740.050.1280.1280.559
Isoleucine1.021.060.961.010.030.1700.1050.835
Phenylalanine0.870.900.810.880.020.0800.1510.552
Histidine0.910.970.890.930.030.1200.3270.737
Threonine0.931.010.910.960.030.0540.1930.648
Non-essential amino acids (NEAAs)
Glutamate3.213.573.173.360.100.0270.2550.394
Aspartate2.042.131.932.070.060.0650.1490.664
Alanine1.211.261.161.250.030.0420.2730.554
Arginine1.311.381.231.300.040.1040.0600.933
Glycine0.880.970.880.950.030.0200.8630.689
Tyrosine0.710.750.660.720.020.0660.1300.831
Serine0.800.850.780.830.020.0700.3581.000
Proline0.600.660.600.660.020.0100.9210.921
FAAs 18.919.598.629.220.2430.0290.2120.873
Total EAAs8.889.278.328.880.260.1040.1040.733
Total NEAAs10.7611.5810.4111.130.290.0290.2050.859
TAAs19.6420.8518.7320.010.550.0520.1480.946
1 FAAs = glutamate + aspartate + phenylalanine + alanine + glycine + tyrosine. Means within a row followed by no letters or the same letters do not differ significantly (p > 0.05). p-value means the effect of GLY, (VC + NM), or the interaction of GLY and (VC + NM) on the parameter within the same row. p-value means the effect of GLY, (VC + NM), or the interaction of GLY and (VC + NM) on the parameter within the same row.
Table 7. Fatty acid profiles of muscle (mg/kg, on fresh basis).
Table 7. Fatty acid profiles of muscle (mg/kg, on fresh basis).
Group AGroup BGroup CGroup DSEMp-Value
GLYVC + NMGLY × (VC + NM)
Longissimus dorsi
C10:0 (Capric)19.2716.8315.8323.231.860.2180.4470.029
C12:0 (Lauric)18.2317.0013.9320.231.630.1590.7520.050
C14:0 (Myristic)352.13320.47282.47396.3340.900.3440.9410.113
C14:1n5 (Myristoleic)3.27 BC3.50 B2.67 C4.40 A0.220.0020.5100.009
C15:0 (Pentadecanoic)5.306.305.338.601.300.1400.3970.410
C16:0 (Palmitic)9694.678987.137774.7310,636.031205.770.3980.9130.177
C16:1n7 (Palmitoleic)941.30893.53804.271186.8094.790.1150.4340.053
C17:0 (Heptadecanoic)36.8041.7332.3054.1310.520.2390.7170.445
C18:0 (Stearic)4876.934620.833780.975277.70695.900.3990.7600.243
C18:1n9c (Oleic)19,711.2316,653.5316,018.4320,815.171892.720.6580.9040.072
C18:2n6c (Linoleic)1667.831465.801630.332136.83254.430.5660.2480.201
C18:3n3 (Linolenic)67.6062.8064.2098.6012.260.2620.2230.149
C20:0 (Arachidic)60.5363.4051.0073.8010.040.2370.9670.350
C20:1 (Cis-11-eicosenoic)298.27253.43251.33324.3340.270.7360.7740.182
C20:2 (Eicosadienoic)69.7359.5371.4386.9010.380.8060.1990.252
C20:3n6 (Eicosatrienoic)20.0321.4023.0721.133.030.9280.6600.601
C20:4n6 (Arachidonic)120.63133.23120.60120.807.350.4090.4210.424
C20:5n3 (Eicosapentaenoic)5.635.406.535.270.970.4630.7040.610
C21:0 (Heneicosanoic)7.6711.037.0710.701.240.0230.7170.917
C22:1n9 (Erucic)10.13 b18.87 a10.27 b16.07 ab2.040.0070.5310.492
C22:6n3 (Docosahexaenoic)13.3311.0733.4015.577.350.2090.1330.321
SFAs 115,071.5314,084.7311,963.6316,500.771951.540.3900.8640.195
MUFAs 220,964.2017,822.8717,086.9722,346.772000.250.6110.8760.069
PUFAs 31964.801759.231949.572485.10282.230.5750.2440.226
n-3 PUFAs 486.5779.27104.13119.4315.220.7990.0940.479
n-6 PUFAs 51808.501620.431774.002278.77258.940.5580.2630.218
USFAs22,929.0019,582.1019,036.5324,831.872175.790.5890.7630.069
TFAs38,000.5333,666.8331,000.1741,332.634089.250.4840.9370.111
Semimembranosus
C10:0 (Capric)19.2321.6020.4021.332.870.5810.8790.809
C12:0 (Lauric)16.9318.9728.1019.536.540.6310.3960.441
C14:0 (Myristic)341.83396.73390.63380.5358.070.7100.7860.591
C14:1n5 (Myristoleic)2.833.803.674.030.870.4640.5560.739
C15:0 (Pentadecanoic)8.809.6712.8310.203.050.7790.4750.582
C16:0 (Palmitic)9787.0010,348.509587.609899.371331.550.7510.8140.928
C16:1n7 (Palmitoleic)897.701123.37918.231160.80148.210.1530.8500.956
C17:0 (Heptadecanoic)51.7361.6356.5759.178.900.5030.8980.693
C18:0 (Stearic)4953.005066.104327.304635.80605.280.7370.4080.876
C18:1n9c (Oleic)20,544.8021,396.2019,421.1020,323.672274.690.7100.6420.991
C18:2n6c (Linoleic)2786.833201.473063.532891.93219.790.5950.9420.219
C18:3n3 (Linolenic)107.80152.63123.67129.2313.230.0930.7830.176
C20:0 (Arachidic)60.2074.0367.8365.6712.320.6480.9770.534
C20:1 (Cis-11-eicosenoic)312.83356.20295.70329.8044.750.4120.6400.920
C20:2 (Eicosadienoic)113.87116.73119.03112.379.570.8480.9680.632
C20:3n6 (Eicosatrienoic)31.8334.8327.7029.902.200.2710.0730.860
C20:4n6 (Arachidonic)227.03195.43149.23188.0023.710.8840.1100.176
C20:5n3 (Eicosapentaenoic)11.9714.906.9010.503.280.3490.1870.922
C21:0 (Heneicosanoic)11.6713.179.6012.671.220.0980.3230.538
C22:1n9 (Erucic)13.80 B31.83 A12.47 B17.23 B1.82<0.0010.0020.007
C22:6n3 (Docosahexaenoic)31.0029.0725.2332.074.110.5670.7450.317
SFAs 115,250.4016,010.4014,500.8715,104.271968.730.7380.6850.969
MUFAs 221,771.9722,911.4020,651.1721,835.532436.640.6460.6640.993
PUFAs 33310.333745.073515.303394.00256.100.5580.7830.309
n-3 PUFAs 4150.77196.60155.80171.8017.940.1230.5970.430
n-6 PUFAs 53045.703431.733240.473109.83234.680.6010.7930.303
USFAs25,082.3026,656.4724,166.4725,229.532554.200.6200.6590.923
TFAs40,332.7042,666.8738,667.3340,333.804466.050.6660.6660.942
1 SFAs (saturated fatty acids) = C10:0 + C12:0 + C14:0 + C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0+ C18:0 + C20:0 + C21:0; 2 MUFAs (monounsaturated fatty acids) = C16:1 + C18:1n9c + C20:1 + C22:1n9 + C24:1; 3 PUFAs (polyunsaturated fatty acids) = C18:2n6c + C18:3n3 + C20:2 + C20:3n6 + C20:4n6 + C20:5n3 + C22:6n3; 4 n-3 PUFAs = C18:3n3 + C20:5n3 + C22:6n3; 5 n-6 PUFAs = C18:2n6c + C20:3n6 + C20:4n6; means within a row followed by different lowercase letters differ significantly (p < 0.05) and followed by different uppercase letters differ significantly (p < 0.01). p-value means the effect of GLY, (VC + NM), or the interaction of GLY and (VC + NM) on the parameter within the same row.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, L.; Hao, S.; Zou, W.; Wei, P.; Sun, W.; Wu, H.; Lu, W.; He, Y. Effects of Supplementing Growing–Finishing Crossbred Pigs with Glycerin, Vitamin C and Niacinamide on Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality. Animals 2023, 13, 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233635

AMA Style

Deng L, Hao S, Zou W, Wei P, Sun W, Wu H, Lu W, He Y. Effects of Supplementing Growing–Finishing Crossbred Pigs with Glycerin, Vitamin C and Niacinamide on Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality. Animals. 2023; 13(23):3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233635

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deng, Linglan, Shaobin Hao, Wanjie Zou, Panting Wei, Wenchen Sun, Huadong Wu, Wei Lu, and Yuyong He. 2023. "Effects of Supplementing Growing–Finishing Crossbred Pigs with Glycerin, Vitamin C and Niacinamide on Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality" Animals 13, no. 23: 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233635

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop